Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2016
  • Online publication date: February 2016

10 - Dynamic Processes within Associative Memory Stores: Piecing Together the Neural Basis of Creative Cognition



Memory is essential for creativity. Consider, for example, the classical four-stage model of creativity proposed by Wallas (1926), based on the ideas of Helmholtz (1896) in which creative achievement occurs through preparation, incubation, illumination, and verification. Preparation, the stage in which adequate knowledge of the creative domain is acquired, necessarily involves extensive encoding of information and the ability to retain that information over time. Verification, the stage in which creative output is evaluated in terms of its accuracy or utility, must involve the retrieval of information and skills necessary for the appraisal. The incubation and illumination stages involve memory processes insofar as previously acquired information is recombined to generate and recognize a novel idea. Clearly, memory processes figure prominently at every stage of this model. How can memory be so flexible such that information acquired in one way can be manipulated and recapitulated in so many other ways? What clues are there to the neural mechanisms underlying these dynamic memory processes?

We attempt to address these questions in this chapter by conceptualizing creative cognition as a set of separable but interdependent cognitive processes that collectively generate creative output. We are particularly interested in processes that interact with information stored in memory to either facilitate or hinder the novel recombining of ideas that is characteristic of creative cognition. We first describe the associationist approach to creativity, one that is amenable to a variety of cognitive and neuroscientific analyses. This discussion will provide a precursor to our integration of discoveries on the nature of human memory retrieval with cognitive processes that have been defined in creative thinkers. More specifically, we consider one oft-cited attribute of creative individuals, reduced behavioral and cognitive inhibition (e.g., Eysenck, 1995; Martindale, 1999), and merge it with insights into inhibitory processes regulating retrieval from semantic memory stores. Lastly, we apply the results of functional neuroimaging studies on inhibitory process in memory retrieval to generate a possible neurobiological mechanism underlying this aspect of creative cognition. Thus, this chapter offers two central ideas: (1) a distinct mechanism by which inhibitory cognitive mechanisms may alter the expression of creativity and (2) an improved outline of the neurobiological systems upon which this mechanism operates.

Allen, G. A., Mahler, W. A., & Estes, W. K. (1969). Effects of recall tests on long-term retention of paired associates. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 8, 463–470.
Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1063–1087.
Anderson, M. C., & Green, C. (2001). Suppressing unwanted memories by executive control. Nature, 410, 366–369.
Anderson, M. C., Ochsner, K. N., Kuhl, B., Cooper, J., Robertson, E., Gabrieli, S. W., Glover, G. H., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2004). Neural systems underlying the suppression of unwanted memories. Science, 303, 232–235.
Anderson, M. C., & Spellman, B. A. (1995). On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: Memory retrieval as a model case. Psychological Review, 102, 68–100.
Barnes, J. M., & Underwood, B. J. (1959). “Fate” of first-list associations in transfer theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 95–105.
Benjamin, A. S. & Bjork, R. A. (1996). Retrieval fluency as a metacognitive index. In Reder, L. M. (Ed.), Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 309–338). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bernstein, D. A., & Goss, S. S. (1999). Functional fixedness in problem solving. In Broeker, C. B. (Ed.), Activities handbook for the teaching of psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 216–217). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1992). A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. In Healy, A. F., Kossyln, S. M., & Schiffrin, R. M., (Eds.), Essays in honor of William K. Estes: From learning processes to cognitive processes (Vol. 2, pp. 35–67). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bleuler, E. (1911). Dementia praecox or the group of schizophrenics. New York: International Universities Press.
Boivin, M. J., Giordani, B., Berent, S., Amato, D. A., Lehtinen, S., Koeppe, R. A., Buchtel, H. A., Foster, N. L., & Kuhl, D. E. (1992). Verbal fluency and positron emission tomographic mapping of regional cerebral glucose metabolism. Cortex, 28, 231–239.
Bousfield, W. A., Sedgewick, C. H. W., & Cohen, B. H. (1954). Certain temporal characteristics of the recall of verbal associates. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 111–118.
Bulevich, J. B.,Roediger, H. L. III., Balota, D. A., & Butler, A. C. (2006). Failures to find suppression of episodic memories in the think/no-think paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1569–1577.
Carlsson, I., Wendt, P. E., & Risberg, J. (2000). On the neurobiology of creativity: Differences in frontal activity between high and low creative subjects. Neuropsychologia, 38, 873–885.
Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & Cognition, 11, 633–642.
Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 499–506.
Coney, J., & Serna, P. (1995). Creative thinking for an information processing perspective: A new approach to Mednick's theory of associative hierarchies. Journal of Creative Behavior, 29, 109–131.
Coren, S., & Schulman, M. (1971). Effects of an external stress on commonality of verbal associates. Psychological Reports, 28, 328–330.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity. New York: HarperCollins.
Dentler, R. A., & Mackler, B. (1964). Originality: Some social and personal determinants. Behavioral Science, 9, 1–7.
Depue, B. E. (2012). A neuroanatomical model of prefrontal inhibitory modulation of memory retrieval. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 1382–1399.
Desiderato, O., & Sigal, S. (1970). Associative productivity as a function of creativity level and type of verbal stimulus. Psychonomic Science, 18, 357–358.
de Souza, L., Volle, E., Bertoux, M., Czernecki, V., Funkiewiez, A., Allali, G., Leroy, B., Sarazin, M., Habert, M. O., Dubois, B., Kas, A., & Levy, R. (2010). Poor creativity in frontotemporal dementia: a window into the neural basis of the creative mind. Neuropsychologia, 48, 3733–3742.
de Souza, L. C., Guimarães, H. C., Teixeira, A. L., Caramelli, P., Levy, R., Dubois, B., & Volle, E. (2014). Frontal lobe neurology and the creative mind. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 761–806.
Dougherty, K. M., & Johnston, J. M. (1996). Overlearning, fluency, and automaticity. Behavior Analyst, 19, 289–292.
Eysenck, H. (1995). Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Forbach, G. B., & Evans, R. G. (1981). The remote associates test as a predictor of productivity in brainstorming groups. Applied Psychological Measurement, 5, 333–339.
Helmholtz, H. v. (1896). Vortäge und Reden. Brunswick, Germany: Friedrich Vieweg.
Hodges, J. R., Patterson, K., Oxbury, S., & Funnell, E. (1992). Semantic dementia progressive fluent aphasia with temporal lobe atrophy. Brain, 115(6), 1783–1806.
Horton, D. L., Marlowe, D., & Crowne, D. (1963). The effect of instruction set and need for social approval on commonality of word association responses. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 67–72.
Hudspeth, S. (1985). The neurological correlates of creative thought. PhD. dissertation, University of Southern California.
Jansson, D. G., & Smith, S. M. (1991). Design fixation. Design Studies, 12, 3–11.
Koppel, R. H., & Storm, B. C. (2014). Escaping mental fixation: Incubation and inhibition in creative problem solving. Memory, 22, 340–348.
Krop, H. D., Alegre, C. E., & Williams, C. D. (1969). Effects of induced stress on convergent and divergent thinking. Psychological Reports, 24, 895–898.
Lindgren, H. C., & Lindgren, F. (1965). Brainstorming and orneriness as facilitators of creativity. Psychological Reports, 16, 577–583.
Lubow, R. E., & Gewirtz, J. C. (1995). Latent inhibition in humans: Data, theory, and implications for schizophrenia. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 87–103.
Maltzman, I., Bogartz, W., & Breger, L. (1958a). A procedure for increasing word association originality and its transfer effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 392–398.
Maltzman, I., Brooks, L. O., Bogartz, W., & Summers, S. S. (1958b). The facilitation of problem solving by prior exposure to uncommon responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 399–406.
Maltzman, I., Simon, S., & Licht, L. (1962). Verbal conditioning of common and uncommon word associations. Psychological Reports, 10, 363–369.
Martindale, C. (1971). Degeneration, disinhibition, and genius. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 7, 177–182.
Martindale, C. (1977). Creativity, consciousness, and cortical arousal. Journal of Altered States of Consciousness, 3, 69–87.
Martindale, C. (1981). Cognition and consciousness. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
Martindale, C. (1990). Creative imagination and neural activity. In Kunzendorf, R. & Sheikh, A. (Eds.), Psychophysiology of mental imagery: Theory, research, and application. (pp. 89–108). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
Martindale, C. (1999). Biological bases of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 137–152). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martindale, C., Anderson, K., Moore, K., & West, A. N. (1996). Creativity, oversensitivity, and rate of habituation. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 423–427.
Martindale, C., & Hines, D. (1975). Creativity and cortical activation during creative intellectual and EEG feedback tasks. Biological Psychology, 3, 91–100.
Mednick, M. T., Mednick, S. A., & Jung, C. C. (1964). Continual association as a function of level of creativity and type of verbal stimulus. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 511–515.
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.
Miller, B. L., Boone, K., Cummings, J. L., Read, S. L., & Mishkin, F. (2000). Functional correlates of musical and visual ability in frontotemporal dementia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 458–463.
Miller, B. L., Cummings, J., Mishkin, F., Boone, K., Prince, F., Ponton, M., & Cotman, C. (1998). Emergence of artistic talent in fronto-temporal dementia. Neurology, 51, 978–982
Mohr, C., Graves, R. E., Gianotti, L. R. R., Pizzagalli, D., & Brugger, P. (2001). Loose but normal: A semantic association study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 475–483.
Murayama, K., Miyatsu, T., Buchli, D., & Storm, B. C. (2014). Forgetting as a consequence of retrieval: A meta-analytic review of retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1383–1409.
Neely, J. H. (1976). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Evidence for facilitatory and inhibitory processes. Memory & Cognition, 4, 648–654.
Nelson, K. (1974). Concept, word, and sentence: Interrelations in acquisition and development. Psychological review, 81(4), 267.
Nickerson, R. S. (1984). Retrieval inhibition from part-set cuing: A persisting enigma in memory research. Memory & Cognition, 12, 531–552.
Roediger, H. L. III., & Neely, J. H. (1982). Retrieval blocks in episodic and semantic memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 213–242.
Scoville, W. B., & Milner, B. (1957). Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. Journal of Neurochemistry, 20, 11–21.
Smith, S. M., & Tindell, D.R. (1997). Memory blocks in word fragment completion caused by involuntary retrieval of orthographically similar primes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 355–370.
Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Schumacher, J. S. (1993). Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task. Memory & Cognition, 21(6), 837–845.
Snyder, A. W., Bahramali, H., Hawker, T., & Mitchell, D. J. (2006). Savant-like numerosity skills revealed in normal people by magnetic pulses. Perception, 35, 837–845.
Snyder, A. W., Mulcahy, E., Taylor, J. L., Mitchell, D. J., Sachdev, P., & Gandevia, S. C. (2003). Savant-like skills exposed in normal people by suppressing the left fronto-temporal lobe. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 2, 149–158.
Spitzer, M. (1997). A cognitive neuroscience view of schizophrenia thought disorder. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 23, 29–50.
Spitzer, M., Braun, U., Hermle, L., & Maier, S. (1993). Associative semantic network dysfunction in thought-disordered schizophrenic patients: Direct evidence from indirect semantic priming. Biological Psychiatry, 34, 864–877.
Squire, L. R. (1992). Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. Psychological Review, 99, 195–231.
Stickgold, R., Scott, L., Rittenhouse, C., & Hobson, J. A. (1999). Sleep-induced changes in associative memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 182–193.
Storm, B. C., & Angello, G. (2010). Overcoming fixation. Creative problem solving and retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Science, 21, 1263–1265.
Storm, B. C., Angello, G., & Bjork, E. L. (2011). Thinking can cause forgetting: memory dynamics in creative problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology – Learning, Memory and Cognition, 37, 1287–1293.
Viskontas, I. V., Boxer, A. L., Fesenko, J., Matlin, A., Heuer, H. W., Mirsky, J., & Miller, B. L. (2011). Visual search patterns in semantic dementia show paradoxical facilitation of binding processes. Neuropsychologia, 49, 468–478.
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Hardcourt, Brace, & World.
Warren, R. E. (1977). Time and spread of activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 458–466.
Wiley, J. (1998). Expertise as mental set: The effects of domain knowledge in creative problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 26, 716–730.