Adams, J. N. 2003. Bilingualism and the Latin language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Adams, L. 2014. Case studies of orthography decision making in Mainland Southeast Asia. In Cahill, M. and Rice, K. (eds.), Developing orthographies for unwritten languages. (Publications in language use and education 6). Dallas, TX: SIL International, pp. 231–249.Google Scholar

Ainger, L. M. 1995. My case unpacked: Memories of evacuation from Guernsey in World War II. Dunstable: Author.Google Scholar

Alidou, H., Boly, A., Brock-Utne, B., Diallo, Y., Heugh, K., and Wolff, H.. 2006. Optimizing learning and education in Africa – the language factor: A stock-taking research on mother tongue and bilingual education in sub-Saharan Africa. Working document presented at the Association for the Development of Education in Africa biennial meeting, Libreville, Gabon, 27–31 March 2006.Google Scholar

Allerton, D. J. 1982. Orthography and dialect: How can different regional pronunciations be accommodated in a single orthography? In Haas, W. (ed.), Standard languages spoken and written. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 57–69.Google Scholar

ALMG. 1996. La normalización lingüística de los idiomas mayas. Guatemala: K’ulb’il Yol Twitz Paxil (Academia de Lenguas Mayas de Guatemala).Google Scholar

ALMG. 1999. Concurso literario idioma ch’orti’. Guatemala: K’ulb’il Yol Twitz Paxil (Academia de Lenguas Mayas de Guatemala).Google Scholar

ALMG. 2001a. Ojronerob’ ch’orti’: Vocabulario ch’orti’. Guatemala: K’ulb’il Yol Twitz Paxil (Academia de Lenguas Mayas de Guatemala).Google Scholar

ALMG. 2001b. Pojp jun. Guatemala: K’ulb’il Yol Twitz Paxil (Academia de Lenguas Mayas de Guatemala).Google Scholar

ALMG. 2001c. Utwa’chir e ojroner ch’orti’: Tradición oral ch’orti’. Guatemala. K’ulb’il Yol Twitz Paxil (Academia de Lenguas Mayas de Guatemala).Google Scholar

ALMG. 2005. Na’tanyaj xe’ ayan taka e pak’ab’ob’, tzijb’arb’ir tama ojronerob’ ch’orti’ yi e castellano – tradición oral bilingüe de la cultura ch’orti’, ch’orti’–castellano. Guatemala. K’ulb’il Yol Twitz Paxil (Academia de Lenguas Mayas de Guatemala).Google Scholar

ALMG. 2009. Ustayaj tz’ijb’ te ojroner ch’orti’: Gramática normativa ch’orti’. Guatemala. K’ulb’il Yol Twitz Paxil (Academia de Lenguas Mayas de Guatemala).Google Scholar

Anis, J. 2007. Neography: Unconventional spelling in French SMS text messages. In Danet, B. and Herring, S. (eds.), The multilingual internet. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 87–115.Google Scholar

Ar Merser, A. 1980. Les graphies du breton (étude succincte). Brest: Ar Helenner.Google Scholar

Ar Merser, A. 1996. Précis de prononciation du breton, 3rd ed. Brest: Emgleo Breiz/Ar Skol Vrezoneg.Google Scholar

Ar Merser, A. 1999. Les orthographes du breton, 4e édition revue et corrigée. Brest: Brud Nevez.Google Scholar

Ascoli, G. 1873. Schizzi franco-provenzali. Archivio glottologico italiano 3: 60–120.Google Scholar

Avanza, M. and Laferté, G.. 2005. Dépasser la ‘construction des identités’? Identification, image sociale, appartenance. Genèses 61(4): 134–152.Google Scholar

Baker, C. 2011. Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism, 5th ed. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Baker, P. 1997. Developing ways of writing vernaculars: Problems and solutions in historical perspective. In Tabouret-Keller, A., Le Page, R. B., Gardner-Chloros, P., and Varro, G. (eds.), Vernacular literacy: A re-evaluation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 93–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barton, D. 1994. Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bauernschmidt, A. 1977. The ideal orthography. Nova lit 5(3): 1–8.Google Scholar

Becerra, M. E. 1910. Estudio lexicológico. Bol. soc. mex. geog. estad., 30: 97–112.Google Scholar

Bédier, J. (ed.). 1968. La chanson de Roland. Paris: Piazza.Google Scholar

Benson, C. 2004. The importance of mother tongue-based schooling for educational quality. Commissioned study for EFA Global Monitoring Report 2005. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar

Benson, C. and Kosonen, K. (eds.). 2013. Language issues in comparative education: Inclusive teaching and learning in non-dominant languages and cultures. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bermel, L. 2007. Linguistic authority, language ideology, and metaphor: The Czech spelling wars. (Language power and social process 17). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berry, J. 1968. The making of alphabets. In Fishman, J. A. (ed.), Readings in the sociology of language. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 737–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bert, M. and Costa, J.. 2009. Etude FORA: Francoprovençal et occitan en Rhône-Alpes. Etude scientifique. Lyon. Available online at www.rhonealpes.fr/uploads/Document/b3/WEB_CHEMIN_5067_1255705111.pdf (last accessed 21 June 2015).Google Scholar

Billerey-Mosier, R. 2002. JPlotFormants v1.4 Formant-plotting software. Available at www.linguistics.ucla.edu/people/grads/billerey/PlotFrog.htm (last accessed 31 March 2015).Google Scholar

Bird, S. 2001. Orthography and identity in Cameroon. Written language and literacy 4(2): 131–162.Google Scholar

Bispham, E. 2007. From Asculum to Actium: The municipalization of Italy from the Social War to Augustus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Blanchard, N. 2003. Un agent du Reich à la rencontre des militants bretons: Leo Weisgerber. Leoriou bihan Brud Nevez 11. Brest: Emgleo Breiz.Google Scholar

Blasco Ferrer, E. 1986. La lingua sarda contemporanea. Cagliari: Ed. Della Torre.Google Scholar

Bleek, D. F. 1929a. Bushman folklore. Africa 2: 302–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bleek, D. F. 1929b. Comparative vocabularies of Bushman languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bleek, D. F. 1956. A Bushman dictionary. New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar

Bleek, D. F. (edited and introduced by Güldemann, T.). 2000. The ǁŋǃke or Bushmen of Griqualand West: Notes on the language of the ǁŋǃke or Bushmen of Griqualand West. (Khoisan forum 15). Cologne: University of Cologne.Google Scholar

Bleek, W. H. I. 1858. The library of His Excellency, Sir George Grey, K. C. B., Philology. Volume 1, Part 1: South Africa. London: Trübner and Co.Google Scholar

Blommaert, J. 2004. Writing as a problem: African grassroots writing, economies of literacy, and globalization. Language in society 33: 643–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blythe, J. and Kofod, F.. 2002. Literature for the semi-literate: Issues for emerging literacies in the Kimberley region of north-western Australia. In Brown, R. McKenna (ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth Foundation for Endangered Languages Conference. Bath: FEL, pp. 66–76.Google Scholar

Bolognesi, R. 1998. The phonology of Campidanian Sardinian: A unitary account of a self-organizing structure. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Bonfil Batalla, G. 1996. México profundo: Reclaiming a civilization. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Boretzky, N. 1986. Zur Sprache der Gurbet von Priština (Jugoslawien). Giessener Hefte für Tsiganologie 3: 195–216.Google Scholar

Bow, C. 2012. Community-based orthography development in four western Zambian languages. Writing systems research 5(1): 73–87.Google Scholar

Boynton, J. 2014. Don’t paint us white. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Virginia.Google Scholar

Bradley, D. 2005. Issues in orthography development and reform. In Bradley, D. (ed.), Heritage maintenance for endangered languages in Yunnan, China. Melbourne: La Trobe, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar

Brenzinger, M. 2003. Review of ‘A Khoekhoegowab dictionary with an English–Khoekhoegowab index’ (Wilfrid Haacke and Eliphas Eiseb). Lexikos 13: 330–333.Google Scholar

Brenzinger, M. 2013. The twelve modern Khoisan languages. In Witzlack-Makarevich, A. and Ernszt, M. (eds.), Khoisan languages and linguistics. (Research in Khoisan studies 29). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar

Brenzinger, M. 2014. Classifying the non-Bantu click languages. In Ntsebeza, L. and Sanders, C. (eds.), Papers from the pre-colonial catalytic project. Volume 1. Cape Town: University of Cape Town, pp. 80–102.Google Scholar

Brenzinger, M. forthcoming. Case study: Nǁng. In Bradley, D. and Bradley, M. (eds.), Language endangerment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Broudic, F. 1995. La pratique du breton de l’Ancien Régime à nos jours. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar

Brown, R. M. 1998. Mayan language revitalization in Guatemala. In Garzon, S., Brown, R. M., Richards, J. B., and Ajpub’, W. (eds.), The life of our language: Kaqchikel Maya maintenance, shift and revitalization. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 155–170.Google Scholar

Budd, P. and Raymond, M.. 2007. Community-oriented outcomes of language documentation in Melanesia. In Austin, P. K., Bond, O., and Nathan, D. (eds.), Language documentation and linguistic theory. London: SOAS, pp. 51–57.Google Scholar

Cahill, M. 2011. Non-linguistic factors in orthography development. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting. Pittsburgh, PA: 6–9 January 2011.Google Scholar

Cahill, M. 2014. Non-linguistic factors in orthographies. In Cahill, M. and Rice, K. (eds.), Developing orthographies for unwritten languages. (Publications in language use and education 6). Dallas TX: SIL International, pp. 9–25.Google Scholar

Cahill, M. and Karan, E. 2008. Factors in designing effective orthographies for unwritten languages. (SIL International electronic working papers 2008–001). Available online at http://www-01.sil.org/silewp/2008/silewp2008-001.pdf (last accessed 19 April 2017).Google Scholar

Cahill, M. and Rice, K. (eds.). 2014. Developing orthographies for unwritten languages. Dallas, TX: SIL International.Google Scholar

Calaresu, E. 2002. Alcune riflessioni sulla LSU (Limba Sarda Unificada), Plurilinguismo 9: 247–266.Google Scholar

Calaresu, E. 2008. Funzioni del linguaggio e sperimentazioni linguistiche in Sardegna. Ianua. Revista philologica romanica 8: 1–17.Google Scholar

Calvez, R. 2000. La radio en langue bretonne ‒ Roparz Hemon et Pierre-Jakez Hélias: deux rêves de la Bretagne. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes/Brest: CRBC.Google Scholar

Campbell, L. and Poser, W. J.. 2008. Language classification: History and method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Casad, E. 1984. Cora. In Langacker, R. W. (ed.), Studies in Uto-Aztecan grammar Volume 4: Southern Uto-Aztecan grammatical sketches. San Diego, CA: SIL – University of Texas at Arlington, pp. 151–459.Google Scholar

Castillo, E. S. 2000. Language related recommendations of the presidential commission on educational reform. Philippine journal of linguistics 31(2): 39–47.Google Scholar

Chamberlin, J. E. and Namaseb, L.. 2001. Stories and songs across cultures: Perspectives from Africa and the Americas. In Franklin, P. (ed.), Modern Languages Association of America: Profession 2001. New York: Modern Languages Association of America, pp. 24–38.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. and Halle, M.. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

CIL (Corpus inscriptionum latinarum). Berolini: apud Georgium Reimerum.Google Scholar

Clackson, J. and Horrocks, G.. 2007. The Blackwell history of the Latin language. Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Cojti Cuxil, D. 1992. Idiomas y culturas de Guatemala. Guatemala: Instituto de lingüística URLPRODIPMA, Universidad Rafael Landívar.Google Scholar

Collier, K. and Collier, M.. 1975. A tentative phonemic statement of the Apoze dialect, Kela language. Workpapers in Papua New Guinea languages 13: 129–161.Google Scholar

Collins, C. and Namaseb, L.. 2011. A grammatical sketch of N|uuki with stories. (Research in Khoisan studies 25). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar

Colom, A. 2013. How to … avoid pitfalls in participatory development. The Guardian, 4 April 2013. Available online at www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2013/apr/04/how-to-design-participatory-projects (last accessed 31 March 2015).Google Scholar

Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Indígenas en México. 2012. Derechos humanos de los pueblos indígenas de México. México: Comisión Nacional de los Derechos Indígenas.Google Scholar

Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos (CPEUM). 2011. México: Comisión Nacional para los Derechos Humanos.Google Scholar

Contini, M. 1987. Etude de géographie phonétique et de phonétique instrumentale du Sarde. Alexandria: Edizioni Dell’Orso.Google Scholar

Conzemius, E. 1927. Die Rama-Indianer von Nicaragua. Zeitschrift für ethnologie 59 3(6): 291–362.Google Scholar

Cooley, A. E. 2002. The survival of Oscan in Roman Pompeii. In Cooley, A. E. (ed.), Becoming Roman, writing Latin? Literacy and epigraphy in the Roman west. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology, pp. 77–86.Google Scholar

Corbet, D. 1871. Les fleurs de la forêt. Guernsey: F. Clarke.Google Scholar

Corbet, D. 1874. Le jour de l’an. Guernsey: Thomas-Mauger Bichard.Google Scholar

Corbet, D. 1884. Le chant du draïn rimeux. St Peter Port, Guernsey: Guérin.Google Scholar

Corongiu, G. 2013. Il sardo una lingua normale. Cagliari: Condaghes.Google Scholar

Corraine, D. 2000. Normativizatzione ortogràfica de sa limba sarda. Revista de filología románica 17: 257–282.Google Scholar

Costa, J. 2010. Revitalization linguistique : discours, mythes et idéologies; approche critique de mouvements de revitalization en Provence et en Ecosse. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Université Grenoble 3. Available online at http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00625691/ (last accessed 2 July 2015).Google Scholar

Costa, J. 2013. Language endangerment and revitalization as elements of regimes of truth: Shifting terminology to shift perspective. Journal of multilingual and multicultural development 34(4): 317–331.Google Scholar

Costa, J. and Gasquet-Cyrus, M.. 2013. What is language revitalization really about? Competing language revitalization movements in Provence. In Jones, M. C. and Ogilvie, S. (eds.), Keeping languages alive: Documentation, pedagogy and revitalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 212–224.Google Scholar

Coulmas, F. 2003. Writing systems: An introduction to their linguistic analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Crawford, M. H. 1996. Roman statutes. London: Institute of Classical Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London.Google Scholar

Crawford, M. H. 2001. Roman republican coinage. (Reprinted, with corrections). London and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Crawford, M. H. 2011. Imagines italicae. London: Institute of Classical Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London.Google Scholar

Crawhall, N. 1999. San and Khoe rights, identity and language survival in South Africa. In Maharaj, G. (ed.), Between unity and diversity: Essays on nation building in post-apartheid South Africa. Cape Town: IDASA, pp. 33–57.Google Scholar

Crawhall, N. 2004. !Ui-Taa language shift in Gordonia and Postmasburg districts, South Africa. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Cape Town.Google Scholar

Crossan, R.-M. 2005. The retreat of French from Guernsey’s public primary schools, 1800–1939. Transactions of la Société Guernésiaise 25: 851–888.Google Scholar

Crossan, R.-M. 2007. Guernsey, 1814–1914: Migration and modernization. Martlesham, Suffolk: Boydell and Brewer.Google Scholar

Crystal, D. 2000. Language death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dahlquis, A. M. 1995. Trailblazers for translators: The Chichicastenango twelve. Pasadena, CA: William Carey Library.Google Scholar

Danet, B. and Herring, S. (eds.). 2007. The multilingual internet. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dart, C. J. 2014. The social war, 91–88 BC: A history of the Italian insurgency against the Roman republic. Farnham, Surrey; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Dary, C., Elías, S., and Reyna, V.. 1998. Estrategias de sobrevivencia campesina en ecosistemas frágiles. Guatemala: FLASCO.Google Scholar

Dawson, B. J. 1989. Orthography decisions. Notes on literacy 57: 1–13.Google Scholar

De Châlons, P. 1723. Dictionnaire breton-françois du diocèse de Vannes. Vannes: F. Bertho.Google Scholar

DeChicchis, J. n.d. Current trends in Mayan literacy. Unpublished document, Kwansei Gakuin University, Sanda, Japan.Google Scholar

De Garis, M. (ed.). 1967. Dictiounnaire Angllais–Guernésiais. Guernsey: La Société Guernésiaise.Google Scholar

De Garis, M. (ed.). 1982. Dictiounnaire Angllais–Guernésiais, 3rd ed. Chichester: Phillimore.Google Scholar

De Garis, M. (ed.). 2012. Dictiounnaire Angllais–Guernésiais, 4th ed. Chichester: Phillimore.Google Scholar

Dekker, D. E. 2003. A case study of the first language component bridging programme in rural Philippines. Philippine journal of linguistics 34(1): 143–149.Google Scholar

De Prada-Samper, J. M. 2012. The forgotten killing fields: ‘San’ genocide and Louis Anthing’s mission to Bushmanland, 1862–1863. Historia 57(1): 172–187.Google Scholar

De Rostrenen, G. 1732. Dictionnaire françois-celtique ou françois-breton. Rennes: Julien Vatar.Google Scholar

Del Tutto Palma, L. 1995. Forme della romanizzazione nell’epigrafia lucana. Eutopia 4(1): 151–198.Google Scholar

Dell’Aquila, V. and Iannàccaro, G.. 2004. La pianificazione linguistica. Lingue, società e istituzioni. Rome: Carocci.Google Scholar

Dell’Aquila, V. and Iannàccaro, G.. 2010. Alcune riflessioni sociolinguistiche sulle grafie spontanee dei dialetti sardi e sulla Limba Sarda Comuna. In Corongiu, G. and Romagnino, C. (eds.), Sa diversidade de sas limbas in Europa, Itàlia e Sardigna. Cagliari: Regione Autònoma de Sardigna, pp. 79–89.Google Scholar

Departamento de Educación Indígena. n.d. Nayerijsɨmua’ira’. Nayarit.Google Scholar

Department of Education, ARMM. 2012. Partners develop Iranun language primer. Available online at http://deped.armm.gov.ph/2012/12/partners-develop-iranun-language-primer.html (last accessed 31 March 2015).Google Scholar

Department of Education, Philippines. 2009. Order No. 74, s. 2009. Institutionalizing mother tongue-based multilingual education (MLE). Manila: DepEd. Available online at www.deped.gov.ph/orders/do-74-s-2009 (last accessed 31 March 2015).Google Scholar

Department of Education, Philippines. 2013. Order No. 28, s. 2013. Additional Guidelines to DepEd Order No. 16, s. 2012. Guidelines on the implementation of the mother tongue based-multilingual education (MTB-MLE). Manila: DepEd. Available online at www.deped.gov.ph/orders/do-28-s-2013 (last accessed 31 March 2015).Google Scholar

Deshayes, A. 2003. Dictionnaire étymologique du breton. Chasse-Marée, Douarnenez and Brest: CRBC.Google Scholar

Deuber, D. and Hinrichs, L.. 2007. Dynamics of orthographic standardization in Jamaican creole and Nigerian pidgin. World Englishes 26: 22–47.Google Scholar

DeVolder, C., Schreyer, C., and Wagner, J. (eds.). 2012. Kala kaŋa bi ŋa kapia – Diksineri bilong tok ples Kala. Kelowna: Centre for Social, Spatial and Economic Justice.Google Scholar

Dickens, P. 1991. Juǀ’hoan orthography in practice. South African journal of African languages 11(1): 99–104.Google Scholar

DIGEIBIR. 2013. Documento nacional de lenguas originarias de Perú. Peru: Dirección general de educación intercultural, bilingüe y rural.Google Scholar

Djité, P. 2009. Multilingualism: The case for a new research focus. International journal of the sociology of language 199: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dobrin, L. 2008. From linguistic elicitation to eliciting the linguist: Lessons in community empowerment from Melanesia. Language 84(2): 300–324.Google Scholar

Doke, C. 1936. An outline of ǂKhomani Bushman phonetics. Bantu studies 10: 433–461.Google Scholar

Dowding, J. and Marquis, Y.. 2012. Warro! Learn Guernsey’s language. Guernsey: Guernsey Museums.Google Scholar

Easton, C. 2003. Alphabet design workshops in Papua New Guinea: A community-based approach to orthography development. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Language Development, Language Revitalization and Multilingual Education in Minority Communities in Asia, Bangkok, Thailand, 6–8 November 2003. Available online at http://www-01.sil.org/asia/ldc/parallel_papers/catherine_easton.pdf (last accessed 31 March 2015).Google Scholar

Easton, C. and Wroge, D.. 2002. Manual for alphabet design through community interaction. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics. Available online at www.sil.org/resources/archives/51482 (last accessed 31 March 2015).Google Scholar

Ellis, W. 2012. Genealogies and narratives of San authenticities: The ǂKhomani San land claim in the Southern Kalahari. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Western Cape.Google Scholar

Elšik, V. and Matras, Y.. 2006. Markedness and language change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

England, N. C. 1996. The role of language standardization in revitalization. In Fischer, E. F. and Brown, R. McKenna (eds.), Maya cultural activism in Guatemala. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 178–194.Google Scholar

England, N. C. 1998. Mayan efforts toward language preservation. In Grenoble, L. A. and Whaley, L. J. (eds.), Endangered languages: Current issues and future prospects. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 99–116.Google Scholar

England, N. C. 2003. Mayan language revival and revitalization politics: Linguists and linguistic ideologies. American anthropologist 105(4): 733–743.Google Scholar

Exter, M. 2008. Properties of the anterior and posterior click closures in Nǀuu. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Cologne.Google Scholar

Exter, M. 2013. Nǀuu Lexikon. Unpublished manuscript, University of Cologne.Google Scholar

Exter, M. 2015. Lexical tones in Nǀuu: A first descriptive approach. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Falc’hun, F. 1953. Autour de l’orthographe bretonne. Annales de Bretagne 60(1): 48–77. Also available online at www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/article/abpo_0003-391x_1953_num_60_1_1905 (last accessed 2 July 2015).Google Scholar

Falc’hun, F. 1981. Perspectives nouvelles sur l’histoire de la langue bretonne. Paris: Union générale d’éditions. (Revised and expanded version of the author’s doctoral dissertation, Rennes, 1951, first published as Histoire de la langue bretonne d’après la géographie linguistique. Paris: PUF, 1963).Google Scholar

Fehn, A.-M., Güldemann, T., Nakagawa, H., and Naumann, C.. 2014. Proposal for a unified alphabetical treatment of IPA click symbols in orthographies, dictionaries, etc. Paper presented at the Fifth International Symposium on Khoisan Languages and Linguistics, Riezlern/Kleinwalsertal, Austria, 13–17 July 2014.Google Scholar

Ferguson, C. 2013. The subjunctive in Guernsey French: Implications for gauging authenticity in an endangered language. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of the West of England, Bristol.Google Scholar

Fischer, E. F. 2010. Cultural logics and global economies: Maya identity in thought and practice. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Fishman, J. A. (ed.). 1977. Advances in the creation and revision of writing systems. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Fishman, J. A. 1991. Reversing language shift: Theoretical and empirical foundations of assistance to threatened languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Fishman, J. A. 2001. Can threatened languages be saved? Reversing language shift, revisited: A 21st century perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Fleuriot, L. 1964. Le vieux-breton: éléments d’une grammaire. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar

Fleuriot, L. 1964, 1985. Dictionnaire des gloses en vieux-breton. Paris: Klincksieck. (English edition: C. Evans and L. Fleuriot 1985. A dictionary of Old Breton/Dictionnaire du vieux breton: Historical and comparative. 2 volumes. Toronto: Prepcorp).Google Scholar

Foley, W. A. 2004. Language endangerment, language documentation and capacity building: Challenges from New Guinea. In Austin, P. K. (ed.), Language documentation and description. Volume 2. London: SOAS, pp. 28–38.Google Scholar

Fought, J. G. 1967. Chorti (Mayan): Phonology, morphophonemics, and morphology. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar

Fought, J. G. 1972. Chortí (Mayan) texts. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Francis, N. and Reyhner, J.. 2002. Language and literacy teaching for indigenous education: A bilingual approach. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Friedman, V. A. 2005. The Romani language in Macedonia in the third Millenium: Progress and problems. In Schrammel, B., Halwachs, D. W., and Ambrosch, G. (eds.), General and applied Romani linguistics. Munich: Lincom Europa, pp. 163–173.Google Scholar

Gamboa Montejano, M. 2008. Derechos indígenas. Estudio teórico conceptual, de antecedentes e iniciativas, presentes en la LIX legislatura y en los dos primeros años de ejercicio de la LX legislatura (primera parte). México: Dirección de Servicios de Investigación y Análisis de la Cámara de Diputados de la LX Legislatura – Centro de Documentación y Análisis.Google Scholar

Giffen, R. 2015. We begin to write: Creating and using the first Nabit orthography. Unpublished master’s dissertation, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar

Girard, P. 1978. Education in Guernsey – Part II. Report and transactions of la Société Guernésiaise 20: 343–365.Google Scholar

Girard, P. 1980. George Métivier, Guernsey’s national poet. Report and transactions of la Société Guernésiaise 20: 617–633.Google Scholar

Girard, R. 1949. Los chortís ante el problema maya; historia de las culturas indígenas de America, desde su origen hasta hoy. 5 volumes. Mexico: Antigua Librería Robredo.Google Scholar

Girard, R. 1962. Los Maya eternos. Mexico: Antigua Librería Robredo.Google Scholar

González Galván, J. A. 1994. Reforma al artículo 4 constitucional: Pluralidad cultural y derecho de los pueblos indígenas. Boletín Mexicano de derecho comparado 79: 105–111.Google Scholar

Goody, J. 1987. The interface between the written and the oral. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Goody, J. and Watt, I. P.. 1963. The consequences of literacy. Comparative studies in history and society 5: 304–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goody, J. and Watt, I. P.. 1968. The consequences of literacy. In Goody, J. (ed.), Literacy in traditional societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 27–68.Google Scholar

Grenoble, L. A. and Whaley, L. J.. 2006. Saving languages: An introduction to language revitalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Grinevald, C. 1998. Language endangerment in South America: A programmatic approach. In Grenoble, L. A and Whaley, L. J. (eds.), Endangered languages: Current issues and future prospects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 124–159.Google Scholar

Grinevald, C. 2002. Linguistique et langues mayas du Guatemala. Faits de langues (Méso-Amérique, Caraibes, Amazonie) 20: 17–25.Google Scholar

Grinevald, C. 2005. Why the Tiger language and not Rama Cay Creole? Language revitalization made harder. In Austin, P. K. (ed.), Language documentation and description. Volume 3. London: SOAS, pp. 196–224.Google Scholar

Grinevald, C. and Bert, M.. 2011. Speakers and communities. In Austin, P. K. and Sallabank, J. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of endangered languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 45–65.Google Scholar

Grinevald, C. and Bert, M.. 2014. Whose ideology, where and when? Rama (Nicaragua) and Francoprovençal (France) experiences. In Austin, P. K. and Sallabank, J. (eds.), Endangered languages: Beliefs and ideologies in language documentation and revitalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 355–383.Google Scholar

Grinevald, C. and Pivot, B.. 2013. On the revitalization of a ‘treasure language’, the Rama Language Project of Nicaragua. In Jones, M. C. and Ogilvie, S. (eds.), Keeping languages alive: Documentation, pedagogy and revitalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 181–197.Google Scholar

Gudschinsky, S. C. 1972. Notes on neutralization and orthography. Notes on literacy 14: 21–22.Google Scholar

Guillevic, A. and Le Goff, P.. 1902, Grammaire bretonne du dialecte de Vannes. Vannes: Galles.Google Scholar

Güldemann, T. 2006. The San languages of southern Namibia: Linguistic appraisal with special reference to J. G. Krönlein’s Nǀuusaa data. Anthropological linguistics 48(4): 369–395.Google Scholar

Güldemann, T. 2014a. ‘Khoisan’ language classification today. In Güldemann, T. and Fehn, A.-M. (eds.), Beyond ‘Khoisan’: Historical relations in the Kalahari Basin. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 1–41.Google Scholar

Güldemann, T. 2014b. Towards casting a wider net over Nǁng: Chances and challenges of archival Khoisan resources. Paper presented at the Nǁng (Nǀuu) Conference: Past and Present of the Language and Its Speakers, University of Cape Town, South Africa, 17 March 2014.Google Scholar

Güldemann, T., Ernszt, M., Siegmund, S., and Witzlack-Makarevich, A.. forthcoming. A text documentation of Nǀuu. Electronic corpus (unpublished, extracted wordlist only).Google Scholar

Güldemann, T. and Vossen, R.. 2000. Khoisan. In Heine, B. and Nurse, D. (eds.), African languages: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 99–122.Google Scholar

Haarmann, H. 1990. Language planning in the light of a general theory of language: A methodological framework. International journal of the sociology of language 86: 103–126.Google Scholar

Halwachs, D. 2009. Romani: An endangered language? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Gypsy Lore Society, Helsinki, 29 August 2009.Google Scholar

Halwachs, D. 2012. Functional expansion and language change: The case of Burgenland Romani. Romani studies 22: 49–66.Google Scholar

Hansen, D., Shneiderman, B., and Smith, M. A.. 2011. Analysing social media networks with NodeXL: Insights from a connected world. Amsterdam: Morgan Kaufman.Google Scholar

Hatcher, L. 2008. Script change in Azerbaijan: Acts of identity. International journal of the sociology of language 192: 105–116.Google Scholar

Heine, B. and Honken, H.. 2010. The Kx’a family: A new Khoisan genealogy. Journal of Asian and African studies 79: 5–36.Google Scholar

Hemon, R. 1955. La spirante dentale en breton. Zeitschrift für celtische philologie 25(1–2): 59–87.Google Scholar

Hemon, R. 1975. A historical morphology and syntax of Breton. Dublin: Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar

Henly, A. T. 1949. Ichin nou pâle l’patouais. Patois spoken here: A selection of poems. Guernsey: House of Books.Google Scholar

Hentschel, E. 1998. Communication on IRC. Linguistik online 1(1). Available online at www.linguistik-online.com/irc.htm (last accessed 27 March 2015).Google Scholar

Heugh, K. 2002. Recovering multilingualism: Language policy developments in South Africa. In Mesthrie, R. (ed.), Language in South Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 449–475.Google Scholar

Heugh, K. 2005a. Language education policies in Africa. In Brown, K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Volume 6. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, pp. 414–423.Google Scholar

Heugh, K. 2005b. Teacher education issues: Implementation of a new curriculum and language in education policy. In Alexander, N. (ed.), Mother tongue-based bilingual education in South Africa: The dynamics of implementation. (Multilingualism, subalternity and hegemony of English 4). Frankfurt am Main: Multilingualism Network and Cape Town PRAESA, pp. 137–158.Google Scholar

Heugh, K. and Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (eds.). 2010. Multilingual education works: From the periphery to the centre. Hyderabad: Orient Blackswan.Google Scholar

Hewitt, S. 1987. Réflexions et propositions sur l’orthographe du breton. La Bretagne linguistique 3: 41–54.Google Scholar

Hill, K. (ed.). 2000. The collected works of Marjorie Ozanne 1897–1973 in Guernsey-French with English translations. Volume 1. Guernsey: La Société Guernésiaise.Google Scholar

Hinton, L. 2001. New writing systems. In Hinton, L. and Hale, K. (eds.), The green book of language revitalization in practice. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 239–250.Google Scholar

Hinton, L. 2014. Orthography wars. In Cahill, M. and Rice, K.. (eds.), Developing orthographies for unwritten languages. (Publications in language use and education 6). Dallas TX: SIL International, pp. 139–168.Google Scholar

Hipfner-Boucher, K., Lam, K., and Chen, X.. 2014. The effects of bilingual education on the English language and literacy outcomes of Chinese-speaking children. Written language and literacy 17(1): 116–138.Google Scholar

Hockett, C. F. 1955. A manual of phonology. Bloomington: Indiana University Publications in Anthropology and Linguistics.Google Scholar

Holm, J. A. 1978. The Creole English of Nicaragua’s Miskito Coast: Its sociolinguistic history and a comparative study of its syntax and lexicon. Bibliographical record. London: University of London.Google Scholar

Holton, G. 2009. Creating sustainable language communities through creolization. In Goodfellow, A. M. (ed.), Speaking of endangered languages: Issues in revitalization. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 238–265.Google Scholar

Hull, K. 2003. Verbal art and performance in Ch’orti’ and Maya hieroglyphic writing. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar

Hull, K. 2005. An abbreviated dictionary of Ch’orti’ Maya. A final report for the Foundation for the Advancement of Mesoamerican Studies, Inc. (FAMSI). www.famsi.org/reports/03031/index.htmlGoogle Scholar

Huss, L. 2008. Researching language loss and revitalization. Encyclopedia of language and education. New York: Springer, pp. 3274–3286.Google Scholar

Ibragimov, G. X. 1990. Цахурский язык (Tsakhur language). Moscow: Academy of Sciences USSR.Google Scholar

Ibragimov, G. X. 1992. Language situation in Dagestan and minority ethnic groups. In Soltsev, V. M. and Milchalchenko, V. Y. (eds.), The language situation in the Russian Federation. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar

Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). 2010. Censo nacional de población y vivienda. Mexico City: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía.Google Scholar

Instituto Nacional de Lenguas Indígenas. 2008. Catálogo de las lenguas indígenas nacionales: Variedades lingüísticas de México con sus autodenominaciones y referencias geoestadísticas. Mexico: Diario Oficial de la Federación (14 January).Google Scholar

Jackson, K. H. 1967. A historical phonology of Breton. Dublin: Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar

Jaffe, A. 2000. Introduction: Non-standard orthography and non-standard speech. Journal of sociolinguistics 4(4): 497–513.Google Scholar

Jehan, R. 1999. Des poêmes en Guernésiais. Guernsey: The Author.Google Scholar

Jennings, G. and Marquis, Y. (eds.). 2011. The toad and the donkey: An anthology of Norman literature from the Channel Islands. London: Frances Boutle.Google Scholar

Johnson, H. 2013. ‘The group from the west’: Song, endangered language and sonic activism on Guernsey. Journal of marine and island cultures 1: 99–112.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. 1994. Organized phonology data of Kela. Unpublished manuscript. Ukarumpa: SIL International.Google Scholar

Johnson, S. 2005. Spelling trouble? Language, ideology and the reform of German orthography. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Jones, D. 1950. The phoneme. Cambridge: Heffer and Sons.Google Scholar

Jones, M. A. 1993. Sardinian syntax. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jones, M. C. 2002. ‘Mette a haut dauve la grippe des angllais’: Convergence on the island of Guernsey. In Jones, M. C. and Esch, Edith (eds.), Language change: The interplay of internal, external and non-linguistic factors. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 143–168.Google Scholar

Jones, M. C. 2008. The Guernsey Norman French translations of Thomas Martin: A linguistic study of an unpublished archive. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar

Kaplan, R. B. and Baldauf, R. B.. 1997. Language planning from practice to theory. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Karan, E. 2013. The ABD of orthography testing: Integrating formal or informal testing into the orthography development process. Work papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of North Dakota Session (53): 1–19.Google Scholar

Karan, E. 2014. Standardization: What’s the hurry? In Cahill, M. and Rice, K. (eds.), Developing orthographies for unwritten languages. (Publications in language use and education 6). Dallas, TX: SIL International, pp. 107–138.Google Scholar

Kaufman, T. 1970. Proyecto de alfabetos y ortografías para escribir las lenguas mayances, 5th ed. Guatemala City: Ministerio de Educacíon; Editorial José de Pineda Ibarra, August 1975Google Scholar

Keene, E. O. 2007. The essence of understanding. In Beers, K., Probst, R. E., and Rief, L. (eds.), Adolescent literacy: Turning practice into promise. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, pp. 311–314.Google Scholar

Kergoat, L. 1974. Reolennoù an doare-skrivañ nevez. Rennes: Skol an Emsav.Google Scholar

Kibrik, A. and Testelec, J. (eds.). 1999. Элементы цаурского языка в типологическом освещении (‘Studies in Tsakhur: A typological perspective’). Moscow: Naslediye.Google Scholar

Kilian-Hatz, C. 2003. Khwe dictionary with a supplement on Khwe place-names of West Caprivi by Matthias Brenzinger. (Namibian African studies 7). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, P. 1998. Paradigm effects and opacity. Unpublished manuscript. Stanford University.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, P. 2000. Opacity and cyclicity. The linguistic review 17: 351–367.Google Scholar

Kloss, H. 1967. ‘Abstand languages’ and ‘ausbau languages’. Anthropological linguistics 9: 29–41.Google Scholar

Kloss, H. 1978. Die Entwicklung neuer germanischer Kultursprachen seit 1800. Düsseldorf: Pädagogischer Verlag Schwann.Google Scholar

Kloss, H. 1993. Abstand languages and ausbau languages. Anthropological linguistics 35: 158–170.Google Scholar

Krönlein, J. G. 1861. Vokabular der ǀNusan-Sprache. Unpublished manuscript. Grey Collection of the National Library of South Africa, Cape Town.Google Scholar

Kulick, D. 1992. Language shift and cultural reproduction: Socialization, self, and syncretism in a Papua New Guinean village. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kutsch Lojenga, C. 1996. Participatory research in linguistics. Notes on linguistics 73(2): 13–27.Google Scholar

Kutsch Lojenga, C. 2014a. Orthography and tone: A tone-system typology with implications for orthography development. In Cahill, M. and Rice, K. (eds.), Developing orthographies for unwritten languages. (Publications in language use and education 6). Dallas TX: SIL International, pp. 49–72.Google Scholar

Kutsch Lojenga, C. 2014b. Basic principles for establishing word boundaries. In Cahill, M. and Rice, K. (eds.), Developing orthographies for unwritten languages. (Publications in language use and education 6). Dallas TX: SIL International, pp. 73–106.Google Scholar

Lagadeuc, J. 1499. Le Catholicon: dictionnaire breton-latin-français. Tréguier: Jehan Calvez.Google Scholar

Lai, R. 2009. Gradi di forza nelle occlusive di una sotto-varietà campidanese dell’Ogliastra. Rivista Italiana di dialettologia 33: 85–100.Google Scholar

Lai, R. 2013. Positional effects in Sardinian muta cum liquida: Lenition, metathesis, and liquid deletion. Alexandria: Edizioni Dell’Orso.Google Scholar

Lai, R. 2014. Positional factors in the evolution of Sardinian muta cum liquida: A case study. L’Italia dialettale 75: 149–160.Google Scholar

Lai, R. 2015. Word-initial geminates in Sardinian. Quaderni di linguistica e studi orientali 1: 37–60. doi: 10.13128/QULSO-2421-7220-16515Google Scholar

Lakota Language Consortium. 2012. New Lakota dictionary, 2nd ed. Bloomington, IN: Lakota Language Consortium.Google Scholar

Lawrence-King, A. and Consort, Harp. 2004. Les travailleurs de la mer. Harmonia Mundi – HMU 907330. (CD).Google Scholar

Le Dû, J. 2001. Nouvel atlas linguistique de la Basse-Bretagne. 2 volumes. Brest: CRBC.Google Scholar

Le Gonidec, J.-F. 1807. Grammaire celto-bretonne. Paris: Rougeron.Google Scholar

Le Gonidec, J.-F. 1821. Dictionnaire celto-breton ou breton-français. Angoulême: Trémeau.Google Scholar

Le Gonidec, J.-F. 1838. Grammaire celto-bretonne, 2nd ed. Paris: H. Delloye.Google Scholar

Le Gonidec, J.-F. and de la Villemarqué, T. Hersant. 1847. Dictionnaire français-breton. Saint-Brieuc: Prud’homme.Google Scholar

Le Pelletier, D. L. 1752. Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue bretonne, Paris: François Delaguette.Google Scholar

Le Pipec, E. 2015. La palatalisation en vannetais. La Bretagne linguistique 20.Google Scholar

Le Roux, P. 1924–1963. Atlas linguistique de la Basse-Bretagne. 6 volumes. Rennes-Paris (reprint 1977: Brest: Éditions Armoricaines). Available online at http://sbahuaud.free.fr/ALBB/ and http://projetbabel.org/atlas_linguistique_bretagne/ (last accessed 4 July 2015).Google Scholar

Le Ruyet, J.-C. 2009. Enseignement du breton: parole, liaison et norme: étude présentée dans le cadre d’un corpus de qutre règles de pronunciation pour le breton des écoles. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Université Rennes 2. Available online at http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/45/82/17/ANNEX/thes;http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/45/82/17/PDF/theseLeRuyet.pdfeLeRuyetResume.pdf; and http://breizh.blogs.ouest-france.fr/archive/2011/01/26/faut-il-reformer-l-orthographe-du-breton.html (last accessed 4 July 2015).Google Scholar

Lebarbenchon, R. J. 1980. Des filles, une sorcière, Dame Toumasse et quelques autres. Montebourg: Azeville.Google Scholar

Legge regionale 15 ottobre 1997, n. 26. Promozione e valorizzazione della cultura e della lingua della Sardegna. Available online at www.regione.sardegna.it/j/v/86?v=9&c=72&s=1&file=1997026 (last accessed 20 February 2015).Google Scholar

Legge 15 dicembre 1999, n. 482. Norme in materia di tutela delle minoranze linguistiche storiche. Available online at www.parlamento.it/parlam/leggi/99482l.htm (last accessed 20 February 2015).Google Scholar

Leggio, D. V. 2011. The dialect of the Mitrovica Roma. Romani studies 21: 57–113.Google Scholar

Leggio, D. V. 2013. Lace avilen ko radio. Romani language and identity on the internet. Manchester: University of Manchester.Google Scholar

Lehman, W. 1920. Die Rama Sprache. Zentral Amerikas (Beziehungen Zueinander so wie zu Sudamerika and Mexico): 416–461.Google Scholar

Lenfestey, T. 1875. Le Chant des fontaines. Guernsey: Thomas-Mauger Bichard.Google Scholar

Les Ravigotteurs. 1999. Jimmain va à la bànque. Guernsey: Les Ravigotteurs.Google Scholar

Lewis, M. P. 1993. Real men don’t speak Quiché: Quiché ethnicity, Ki-che ethnic movement, K’iche’ nationalism. Guatemala: SIL International.Google Scholar

Lewis, M. P. and Simons, G. F.. 2010. Assessing endangerment: Expanding Fisherman’s GIDS. Revue roumaine de linguistique 55(2): 103–120. Available online at www.lingv.ro/RRL%202%202010%20art01Lewis.pdf (last accessed 3 November 2015).Google Scholar

Lewis, M. P., Simons, G. F., and Fennig, C. D. (eds.). 2015. Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 18th ed. Dallas, TX: SIL International. Available online at www.ethnologue.com (last accessed 3 July 2015).Google Scholar

Littlebear, R. 2007. Preface. In Cantoni, G. (ed.), Stabilizing indigenous languages, rev. ed. Flagstaff: Northern Arizona University Center for Excellence in Education, pp. xiii–xv.Google Scholar

Lomas, K. 2008. Script obsolescence, writing and power in pre-Roman and early Roman Italy. In Baines, J., Bennet, J., and Houston, S. (eds.), The disappearance of writing systems: Perspectives on literacy and communication. London: Equinox, pp. 109–138.Google Scholar

Lomas, K. 2013. Language, identity, and culture in Ancient Italy. In Gardner, A., Herring, E., and Lomas, K. (eds.), Creating ethnicities and identities in the Roman world. London: Institute of Classical Studies, 70–91.Google Scholar

Longenecker, K., Abel, D., Boruru, R., Nandang, T., Reuben, G., Schreyer, C., and Wagner, J.. 2012. Monitoring village fish resources (Lukautim ples pis na risos bilong en; Koto kana i ŋe ambola ma gele golotome): A school-based fishery project. s.l.: Pacific biological survey contribution 2012–006.Google Scholar

Longenecker, K., Schreyer, C., and Wagner, J.. 2015. Conservation: The relationship between Kala language conservation and marine conservation in coastal Papua New Guinea. Paper presented at the Fourth Annual International Conference on Language Documentation and Conservation, University of Hawai’i at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawai’i Cambridge, USA, 1 March 2015.Google Scholar

López de Rosa, L. and Patal, F. Mucía. 1997. Kanatalwa’r Ch’orti: texto integrado para la primera etapa de post-alfabetización bilingüe idioma Ch’orti’. Guatemala: CONALFA/Instituto de Lingüística de la Universidad de Rafael Landívar.Google Scholar

Loporcaro, M. 2009. Profilo linguistico dei dialetti italiani. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar

Loporcaro, M. 2012. Non sappiamo come scriverlo, perciò non lo parliamo: mille e una scusa per un suicidio linguistico. Rhesis: International journal of linguistics, philology, and literature. Linguistics and philology 3(1): 36–58.Google Scholar

Lőrinczi, M. 1996. Sociolinguistica della ricerca linguistica: punti di vista divergenti sulle consonanti scempie e geminate nell’italiano di Sardegna. Actas do XIX congreso internacional de lingüística e filoloxía románicas 8: 311–334.Google Scholar

Lőrinczi, M. 2013. Linguistica e politica. L’indagine sociolinguistica sulle ‘lingue dei sardi’ del 2007 e il suo contesto politico-culturale, Actes du XXVIe congrès international de linguistique et de philologie romanes. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Lubeck, J. E. 1996. Translation of the New Testament in Ch’orti’. Electronic version. s.i.: Wycliffe Bible Translators.Google Scholar

Lubeck, J. and Cowie, D. L.. 1989. Método moderno para aprender el idioma Chorti’. Guatemala: SIL International.Google Scholar

Luelsdorff, P. A. 1987. Orthography and phonology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Lüpke, F. 2011. Orthography development. In Austin, P. K. and Sallabank, J. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of endangered languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 312–336.Google Scholar

Madeg, M. 2010. Traité de pronunciation du breton du nord-ouest. Brest: Emgleo Breiz.Google Scholar

Mahy, T. H. 1922. Les dires et pensées du ‘Courtil Poussin’. Guernsey: s.n.Google Scholar

Maingard, L. F. 1937. The ǂKhomani dialect of Bushman. In Jones, J. R. and Doke, C. (eds.), Bushmen of the southern Kalahari. Johannesburg: Witswatersrand University Press, pp. 237–275.Google Scholar

Malone, S. 2004. Manual for developing literacy and adult education programmes in minority language communities. Bangkok: UNESCO.Google Scholar

Malone, S. and Paraide, P.. 2011. Mother tongue-based bilingual education in Papua New Guinea. International review of education 57: 705–720.Google Scholar

Manning, P. 1988. Francophone sub-Saharan Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Manzini, M. R. and Savoia, L. M.. 2005. I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa. Alexandria: Edizioni Dell’Orso.Google Scholar

Marcellesi, J.-B. 1983. Identité linguistique, exclamatives et subordonnées: un modèle syntaxique spécifique en Corse. Études corses 20–21: 399–424. (Reprinted in Marcellesi, J.-B., T. Bulot, and P. Blanchet. 2003. Sociolinguistique: épistémologie, langues régionales, polynomie. Paris: L’Harmattan, pp. 209–234).Google Scholar

Marongiu, M. A. 2007. Language maintenance and shift in Sardinia: A case study of Sardinian and Italian in Cagliari. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar

Marquis, Y. and Sallabank, J.. 2013. Speakers and language revitalization: A case study of Guernesiais (Guernsey). In Jones, M. C. and Ogilvie, S. (eds.), Keeping languages alive. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 169–180.Google Scholar

Marquis, Y. and Sallabank, J.. 2014. Ideologies, beliefs and revitalization of Guernesiais (Guernsey). In Austin, P. K. and Sallabank, J. (eds.), Endangered languages: Beliefs and ideologies in documentation and revitalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 151–166.Google Scholar

Martin, J.-B. and Goussé, J.-L.. 2005. Le francoprovençal de poche. Chennevières-sur-Marne: Assimil.Google Scholar

Mastino, A., Morace, A. M., Lupinu, G., Manca, D., Schirru, C., and Toso, F.. 2011. Osservazioni sul piano triennale degli interventi di promozione e valorizzazione della cultura e della lingua sarda 2011–2013. Available online at www.sardegnaeliberta.it/docs/uniss.doc (last accessed 4 July 2015).Google Scholar

Matras, Y. 1999. Writing Romani: The pragmatics of codification in a stateless language. Applied linguistics 20(4): 481–502.Google Scholar

Matras, Y. 2002. Romani: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Matras, Y. 2005. The classification of Romani dialects: A geographic-historical perspective. In Schrammel, B., Halwachs, D. W., and Ambrosch, G. (eds.), General and applied Romani linguistics. Munich: Lincom Europa, pp. 7–26.Google Scholar

Matras, Y. 2013. Mapping the Romani dialects of Romania. Romani studies 23: 199–243.Google Scholar

Matras, Y. 2015. Language and the rise of a transnational Romani identity. Language in society 44: 3.Google Scholar

Maunoir, J. 1659. Le Sacré-Collège de Jésus. Quimper: J. Hardouin.Google Scholar

May, S. 2001. Language and minority rights: Ethnicity, nationalism and the politics of language. London: Longman.Google Scholar

McDonald, K. 2012. The testament of Vibius Adiranus. Journal of Roman studies 102: 40–55.Google Scholar

McDonald, K. 2015. Oscan in southern Italy and Sicily: Evaluating language contact in a fragmentary corpus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McDonald, K. and Zair, N.. 2012. Oscan fουρουστ and the Roccagloriosa bronze law tablet. Incontri linguistici 35: 31–45.Google Scholar

McNichols, J. L. 1977. Alfabeto chortí. Guatemala: SIL International.Google Scholar

Melchers, G. 1987. Spelling and dialect. In Luelsdorff, P. A. (ed.), Orthography and phonology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 187–214.Google Scholar

Membreño, A. 1897. Honduñerismos: Vocabulario de los provincialismos de Honduras. Tegucigalpa: Tipografía Nacional.Google Scholar

Métivier, G. 1831. Rimes guernesiaises par un Câtelain. Guernsey: Barbet.Google Scholar

Métivier, G. 1843. Rimes guernesiaises. London: s.n.Google Scholar

Métivier, G. 1866. Fantaisies guernesiaises: dans le langage du pays, la langue de la civilisation, et celle du commerce. Guernsey: Thomas-Mauger Bichard.Google Scholar

Metz, B. 2001. Investigación y colaboración en el movimiento Maya-Ch’orti’. In Pitarch, P. and López, J. (eds.), Los derechos humanos en el área Maya: Política, representaciones y moralidad. Madrid: Sociedad Española de Estudios Mayas, pp. 311–340.Google Scholar

Metz, B., Ramírez, T., García, F., and García, M.. 1992. Español–Chorti–English – Dictionario [sic]. Unpublished manuscript, 28 September 1992.Google Scholar

Miller, A. 2011. The representation of clicks. In van Oostendorp, M., Ewen, C., Hume, E., and Rice, K. (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology. Volume 1. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 416–439.Google Scholar

Milroy, J. 2001. Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of sociolinguistics 5(4): 530–555.Google Scholar

Mohanan, K. P. 1982. Lexical phonology. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar

Mohanan, K. P. 1986. The theory of lexical phonology. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Reidel.Google Scholar

Mooney, D. 2015. Confrontation and language policy: Non-militant perspectives on conflicting revitalization strategies in Béarn, France. In Jones, M. C. (ed.), Policy and planning for endangered languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 153–170.Google Scholar

Morgan, M. and Gurung, D.. 2002. Languages worth writing: Endangered languages of Nepal. In Brown, R. McKenna (ed.), Endangered languages and their literatures. Bath: FEL, pp. 99–103.Google Scholar

Morvannou, F. 1975. Le Breton sans peine. Chennevières-sur-Marne: Assimil.Google Scholar

Moseley, C. (ed.). 2010. UNESCO atlas of the world’s languages in danger, 3rd ed. Paris: UNESCO. Also available online at www.unesco.org/culture/en/endangeredlanguages/atlas (last accessed 4 July 2015).Google Scholar

Mouritsen, H. 1998. Italian unification: A study in ancient and modern historiography. London: Institute of Classical Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London.Google Scholar

Mullen, A. 2013. Southern Gaul and the Mediterranean: Multilingualism and multiple identities in the Iron Age and Roman periods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Munro, P. 2014. Breaking rules for orthography development. In Cahill, M. and Rice, K. (eds.), Developing orthographies for unwritten languages. Dallas, TX: SIL International, pp. 169–189.Google Scholar

Namaseb, L. 2003. Die alfabet van die ǂKhomani taal of Nǀu. Unpublished manuscript, University of Namibia.Google Scholar

Namaseb, L. (n.d.). ǂKhomani still alive in South Africa. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Namaseb, L., Sands, B., Miller, A., and Brugman, J.. 2005. Let’s learn to spell Nǀuǃ/Laat ons Nǀu leer spelǃ ǀiisi ǁxaǁxa Nǀu i kaqleke. Upington: Communal Property Association (CPA) of the ǂKhomani community.Google Scholar

Nishimura, K. 2005. Superlative suffixes *-ismo- and *-ism̥mo- in Sabellian languages. Glotta 81: 160–183.Google Scholar

Nolasco, R. M. 2008. The prospects of multilingual education and literacy in the Philippines. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Language Development, Language Revitalization and Multilingual Education, Bangkok, Thailand, 1–3 July 2008.Google Scholar

Oakley, H. 1966. Chorti. In Mayers, M. K. (ed.), Languages of Guatemala. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 235–250.Google Scholar

O’Connor, M. 1996. Epigraphic Semitic scripts. In Daniels, P. T. and Bright, W. (eds.), The world’s writing systems. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 88–107.Google Scholar

Orpen, J. M. 1874. A glimpse into the mythology of the Maluti Bushmen. Cape monthly magazine 9: 1–13.Google Scholar

Ostler, N. and Rudes, B.. 2000. Endangered languages and literacy: Papers from the Fourth Foundation for Endangered Languages Conference. Bath: FEL.Google Scholar

Ottenheimer, H. J. 2001. Spelling Shinzwani: Dictionary construction and orthographic choice in the Comoro Islands. Written language and literacy 4(1): 15–29.Google Scholar

Pabst, H. 1895. Die Kalahariwüste und ihre Bewohner. Mitteilungen der geographischen Gesellschaft Jena 14: 48–54.Google Scholar

Page, C. J. 2013. A new orthography in an unfamiliar script: A case study in participatory engagement strategies. Journal of multilingual and multicultural development 34(5): 459–474.Google Scholar

Paksoy, H. B. 1989. Alpamysh: Central Asian identity under Russian rule. Hartford, CT: Association for the Advancement of Central Asian Research Monograph Series.Google Scholar

Palfreyman, D. and Al Khalil, M.. 2007. ‘A funky language for teenzz to use’: Representing Gulf Arabic in instant messaging. In Danet, B. and Herring, S. (eds.), The multilingual internet. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 43–63.Google Scholar

Paris, H. 2012. Sociolinguistic effects of church languages in Morobe Province, Papua New Guinea. International journal for the sociology of language 214: 39–66.Google Scholar

Peccorini, A. 1909. Ligeros apuntes sobre el dialecto Camotán. Revista Centro América intelectual, San Salvador: pp. 79–83.Google Scholar

Penn, N. 2005. The forgotten frontier: Colonist and Khoisan on the Cape’s northern frontier in the 18th century. Cape Town: Double Storey; Athens, OH: Ohio University Press and Swallow Press.Google Scholar

Pérez Martínez, V. 1994. Gramática del idioma ch’orti’. Guatemala: Proyecto Lingüístico Francisco Marroquín.Google Scholar

Pérez Martínez, V. 1996. Leyenda maya ch’orti’. Antigua, Guatemala: Proyecto Lingüístico Francisco Marroquín.Google Scholar

Pérez Martínez, V., Federico García, F. M., and López, J.. 1996. Diccionario del idioma ch’orti’. Antigua, Guatemala: Proyecto Lingüístico Francisco Marroquín.Google Scholar

Philippines, Republic of, Congress. 2013. 15th Congress. Republic Act. An Act enhancing the Philippine Basic Education system by strengthening its curriculum and increasing the number of years for basic education, appropriating funds thereof and for other purposes. Available online at www.gov.ph/2013/05/15/republic-act-no-10533/ (last accessed 31 March 2015).Google Scholar

Phillipson, R. 1992. Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Piano triennale degli interventi di promozione e valorizzazione della cultura e della lingua sarda 2011–2013. Available online at www.regione.sardegna.it/documenti/1_106_20110601093442.pdf (last accessed 20 February 2015).Google Scholar

Pike, K. 1947. Phonemics: A technique for reducing languages to writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Pinnock, H. 2009a. Language and education: The missing link. London: CfBT and Save the Children.Google Scholar

Pinnock, H. 2009b. Steps towards learning: A guide to overcoming language barriers in children’s education. London: Save the Children.Google Scholar

Pinnock, H., Mackenzie, P., Pearce, E., and Young, C.. 2011. Closer to home: How to help schools in low- and middle-income countries respond to children’s language needs. London: CfBT and Save the Children.Google Scholar

Pitts, J. L. 1883. The patois poems of the Channel Islands. Guernsey: Guille-Alles Library.Google Scholar

Pivot, B. 2013. Revitalisation d’une langue post-vernaculaire en pays rama (Nicaragua). Langage et société 145: 55–79.Google Scholar

Pivot, B. 2014. Revitalisation de langues postvernaculaires : le francoprovençal en Rhône-Alpes et le rama au Nicaragua. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Université Lyon 2.Google Scholar

Poccetti, P. 2002–2003. Una nuova carica pubblica osca (tríbuf plífríks) tra problemi linguistici ed istituzionali. Studi e saggi linguistici 40–41: 297–315.Google Scholar

Poccetti, P. 2009. Lineamenti di tradizioni ‘non romane’ di testi normativi. In Ancillotti, A. and Calderini, A. (eds.), L’umbro e le altre lingue dell’Italia mediana antica. Atti del I convegno internazionale sugli antichi umbri, Gubbio, 20–22 settembre 2001. Perugia: Jama, pp. 165–248.Google Scholar

Pöch, R. 1910. Reisen im Innern Südafrikas zum Studium der Buschmänner in den Jahren 1907 bis 1909. Zeitschrift für ethnologie 42(3): 357–362.Google Scholar

Porcu, A. 2014. Una breve introduzione alla questione della lingua sarda. Available online at www.rivistaetnie.com/questione-lingua-sarda/ (last accessed 4 July 2015).Google Scholar

Powers, W. K. 2009. Saving Lakota: Commentary on language revitalization. American Indian culture and research journal 33–34: 139–149.Google Scholar

Powlison, P. S. 1968. Bases for formulating an efficient orthography. The Bible translator 19(2): 74–91.Google Scholar

Prins, F. E. 1999. Dissecting diviners: On positivism, trance-formations, and the unreliable informant. Southern African humanities 20(1): 43–62.Google Scholar

Provincia di Cagliari, Provincia de Casteddu. 2009. Arrègulas po ortografia, fonetica, morfologia e fueddariu de sa norma campidanesa de sa lingua sarda. Available online at www.provincia.cagliari.it/ProvinciaCa/resources/cms/documents/arregulas.pdf (last accessed 20 February 2015).Google Scholar

Prussin, L. 1995. African nomadic architecture: Space, place and gender. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar

Rajah-Carrim, A. 2009. Use and standardization of Mauritian Creole in electronically mediated communication. Journal of computer mediated communication 14: 484–508.Google Scholar

Ramírez, D., Yuen, S., Ramey, D., Pasta, D., and Billings, D.. 1991. Final report: Longitudinal study of structured English immersion strategy, early-exit and late-exit transitional bilingual education programmes for language-minority children. San Mateo, CA: Aguirre International.Google Scholar

Rappa, A. L. and Wee, L.. 2006. Language policy and modernity in south-east Asia: Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Raymond, M. 2007. Literacy work in Papua New Guinea: The accidental and the planned. In Austin, P. K. (ed.), Language documentation and description. Volume 4. London: SOAS, pp. 174–194.Google Scholar

Regione Autònoma de Sardigna. 2007. Lege istatutària de sa Regione Autònoma de Sardigna. Available online at www.sardegnacultura.it/documenti/7_93_20071002122433.pdf (last accessed 23 June 2015).Google Scholar

Regione Autònoma della Sardegna. 2006. Limba Sarda Comuna. Norme linguistiche di riferimento a carattere sperimentale per la lingua scritta dell’Amministrazione regionale. Available online at www.regione.sardegna.it/documenti/1_72_20060418160308.pdf (last accessed 20 February 2015).Google Scholar

Regione Autònoma della Sardegna. 2007. Legge statutaria della Regione Autonoma della Sardegna. Available online at www.regione.sardegna.it/documenti/1_46_20070328190430.pdf (last accessed 23 June 2015).Google Scholar

Rey, C. 2010. Planning language practices and representations of identity within the Gallo community in Brittany: A case of language maintenance. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar

Rice, K. et al. 2012. Orthography development: The ‘midwife’ approach. CoLang and InField workshop presentation slides. Available online at www.rnld.org/sites/default/files/Orthography%20Development.pdf (last accessed 31 March 2015).Google Scholar

Rice, K. and Cahill, M.. 2014. Introduction. In Cahill, M. and Rice, K. (eds.), Developing orthographies for unwritten languages. Dallas, TX: SIL International, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar

Riggs, S. R. 1852. Grammar and dictionary of the Dakota language. (Smithsonian contributions to knowledge). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar

Rindler Schjerve, R. 1998. Codeswitching as an indicator for language shift? Evidence from Sardinian- Italian bilingualism. In Jacobson, R. (ed.), Code switching worldwide. Volume 1. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 221–247.Google Scholar

Rindler Schjerve, R. 2000. Inventario analitico delle attuali trasformazioni del sardo. Revista de filología románica 17: 229–246.Google Scholar

Rix, H. 2002. Sabellische Texte. Die Texte des Oskischen, Umbrischen und Südpikenischen. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter.Google Scholar

Roberge, P. 2002. Afrikaans: Considering origins. In Mesthrie, R. (ed.), Language in South Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 79–103.Google Scholar

Ross, M. 1996. Mission and church languages in Papua New Guinea. In Wurm, S. A., Mühlausler, P., and Tryon, D. T. (eds.), Atlas of languages of intercultural communication in the Pacific, Asia and the Americas. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 595–617.Google Scholar

Roth, D. 2008. El alfabeto del cora de Santa Teresa, Nayarit. México: SIL International.Google Scholar

Rudes, B. 2000. When you choose, must you lose? Standard orthography versus dialect diversity. In Ostler, N. and Rudes, B. (eds.), Endangered languages and literacy: Papers from the Fourth Foundation for Endangered Languages Conference. Bath: FEL, pp. 63–70.Google Scholar

Sackett, K. 2013. Developing a linguistically-informed community-based orthography with the Tsakhur in Azerbaijan. Unpublished MA dissertation, Graduate Institute of Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Sallabank, J. 2007. Attitude shift: Identity and language maintenance in Guernsey Norman French. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Lancaster University.Google Scholar

Sallabank, J. 2010. Standardization, prescription and polynomie: Can Guernsey follow the Corsican model? Current issues in language planning 11(4): 311–330.Google Scholar

Sallabank, J. 2013. Attitudes to endangered languages: Identities and policies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sands, B., Miller, A., and Brugman, J.. 2007. The lexicon in language attrition: The case of Nǀuu. In Payne, D. and Peña, J. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference on African Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, pp. 55–65.Google Scholar

Sands, B., Miller, A., Brugman, J., Namaseb, L., Collins, C., and Exter, M.. 2006. 1400 item Nǀuu dictionary. Unpublished manuscript, Northern Arizona University and Cornell University.Google Scholar

Santos, S., Parra, R., Muñiz, P., and Zeferino, M. I.. 2014. Wá’mwatye náayeri nyúuka. Curso de cora como segunda lengua. Tepic: Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit.Google Scholar

Sapper, K. 1897. Das nördliche Mittel-Amerika nebst einem Ausflug nach dem Hochland von Anahuac. Braunschweig: Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn.Google Scholar

SASI (South African San Institute). 2012. Ek is Spesiaal/Na ng Spesiaal. Afrikaans/N|u. Kimberley: South African San Institute.Google Scholar

Savage, A. 2008. Writing Tuareg. International journal for the sociology of language 192: 5–13.Google Scholar

Savoia, L. M. 2001. La legge 482 sulle minoranze linguistiche storiche. Le lingue di minoranza e le varietà non standard in Italia. Rivista italiana di dialettologia 25: 7–50.Google Scholar

Savoia, L. M. 2002. Componenti ideologiche nel dibattito sulle leggi di tutela linguistica. Plurilinguismo 9: 85–114.Google Scholar

Schieffelin, B. B. and Doucet, R. C.. 1994. The ‘real’ Haitian Creole: Ideology, metalinguistics, and orthographic choice. American ethnologist 21: 176–200.Google Scholar

Schieffelin, B. B, Woolard, K., and Kroskrity, P.. 1998. Language ideologies: Practice and theory. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Schreyer, C. 2015a. Community consensus and social identity in alphabet development: The relationship between Kala and Jabêm. Written language and literacy 18(1): 175–199.Google Scholar

Schreyer, C. 2015b. Reading dictionaries in the dark: The significance of evolving language materials. Paper presented at the Fourth Annual International Conference on Language Documentation and Conservation, University of Hawai’i at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawai’i Cambridge, USA, 28 February 2015.Google Scholar

Schulze, W. 1997. Tsakhur. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

Schumann, O. G. 2007. Introducción a la morfología verbal del Chortí. Mexico: Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Scribner, S. and Cole, M.. 1981. The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Sebba, M. 1998. Phonology meets ideology: The meaning of orthographic practices in British Creole. Language problems and language planning 22(1): 19–47.Google Scholar

Sebba, M. 2007. Spelling and society: The culture and politics of orthography around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sebba, M. 2011. Sociolinguistic approaches to writing systems research. Writing systems research 1(1): 35–49.Google Scholar

Sebba, M. 2012a. Orthography as social action: Scripts, spelling, identity, and power. In Jaffe, A., Androutsopoulos, J., Sebba, M., and Johnson, S. (eds.), Orthography as social action: Scripts, spelling, identity, and power. (Language and social processes 3). Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

Sebba, M. 2012b. Spelling and society: The culture and politics of orthography around the world. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Seifart, F. 2006. Orthography development. In Gippert, J., Himmelmann, N. P., and Mosel, U. (eds.), Essentials of language documentation. (Trends in linguistics. Studies and monographs 178). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 275–299.Google Scholar

Sgall, P. 1987. Towards a theory of phonemic orthography. In Luelsdorff, P. A. (ed.), Orthography and phonology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar

Shah, S. and Brenzinger, M.. 2016. Ouma Geelmeid ke kx’u ǁxaǁxa Nǀuu. Ouma Geelmeid gee Nǀuu. Ouma Geelmeid teaches Nǀuu. Cape Town: CALDi, UCT. Available online at https://open.uct.ac.za/handle/11427/17432Google Scholar

Shah, S., Brenzinger, M., Esau, K., Plessis, C. du, and Prins, M.-A.. 2014a. Illustrated N|uu alphabet charts (clicks, consonants and vowels), with English and Afrikaans translations. Cape Town: CALDi UCT.Google Scholar

Shah, S., Brenzinger, M., Esau, K., Plessis, C. du, and Prins, M.-A.. 2014b. Illustrated N|uu animal poster, with English, Afrikaans and ǂKhomani Nama names. Cape Town: CALDi, UCT.Google Scholar

Shandler, J. 2006. Adventures in Yiddishland: Postvernacular language and culture. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Siegmund, S., Ernszt, M., and Witzlack-Makarewich, A.. 2008. Nǀuu text collection. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

SIL International. 2012. Speech Analyzer – a computer programme for acoustic analysis of speech sounds. Available online at http://www-01.sil.org/computing/sa/index.htm?_ga=GA1.2.583231857.1425300332 (last accessed 31 March 2015).Google Scholar

Silverman, C. 2012. Romani routes: Cultural politics and Balkan music in diaspora. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Simons, G. F. 1977. Principles of multidialectal orthography design. In Loving, R. and Simons, G. F. (eds.), Language variation and survey techniques. (Workpapers in Papua New Guinea languages 21). Ukarumpa: SIL International, pp. 325–342.Google Scholar

Simons, G. F. 1994. Principles of multidialectal orthography design. Notes on literacy 20(2): 13–34.Google Scholar

Sjoberg, A. F. 1966. Sociocultural and linguistic factors in the development of writing systems for pre-literate people. In Bright, W. (ed.), Sociolinguistics. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 260–276.Google Scholar

Skutnabb-Kangas, T. and Heugh, K.. 2010. Introduction – Why this book? In Heugh, K. and Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (eds.), Multilingual education works: From the periphery to the centre. Delhi: Orient Blackswan, pp. 3–39.Google Scholar

Smalley, W. 1964. How shall I write this language? In Smalley, W. A. (ed.), Orthography studies: Articles on new writing systems. (Helps for translators 6). London: United Bible Societies, pp. 31–52.Google Scholar

Smith, P. 2010. The Bunong culture of silence: Exploring Bunong perspectives on participation at the interface between Bunong culture and development organizations. Unpublished MSc dissertation, University of Lund.Google Scholar

Smith, P. and Wisbey, M.. 2013. Signposts to identity-based community development. LEAD Asia. Available online at www.leadimpact.org/identity/ (last accessed 31 March 2015).Google Scholar

Snider, K. 2014. Orthography and phonological depth. In Cahill, M. and Rice, K. (eds.), Developing orthographies for unwritten languages. (Publications in language use and education 6). Dallas TX: SIL International, pp. 27–48.Google Scholar

Stebbins, T. 2001. Emergent spelling patterns in Sm’algyax (Tsimshian, British Columbia). Written language and literacy 4(2): 163–193.Google Scholar

Stich, D., Gouvert, X., and Favre, A.. 2003. Dictionnaire des mots de base du francoprovençal : orthographe ORB supradialectale standardisée. Paris: Bibliothèque des langues de France.Google Scholar

Stoll, D. 1982. Fishers of men or founders of empire? The Wycliffe Bible translators in Latin America. London: Zed Press.Google Scholar

Street, B. V. 1984. Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Suárez, R. A. 1892. Vocabularios pocoman y chorti de Honduras. Box 42, Folder 7, in the William E. Gates Collection, Lee Library, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.Google Scholar

Suleiman, Y. 2003. The Arabic language and national identity. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Suret-Canale, J. 1971. French colonialism in tropical Africa 1900–1945. New York: Pica Press.Google Scholar

Swadesh, M. 1965. Language universals and research efficiency in descriptive linguistics. Canadian journal of linguistics 10(2–3): 147–155.Google Scholar

Tacelosky, K. 2000. Literacy ability and practice in Peru: An indigenous account. In Ostler, N. and Rudes, B. (eds.), Endangered languages and literacy: Proceedings of the Fourth Foundation for Endangered Languages Conference. Bath: FEL.Google Scholar

Tagliavini, C. 1982. Le origini delle lingue neolatine. Padua: Patron editore.Google Scholar

Terrill, A. and Dunn, M.. 2003. Orthographic design in the Solomon Islands: The social, historical, and linguistic situation of Touo (Baniata). Written language and literacy 6(2): 177–192.Google Scholar

Themistocleous, C. 2010. Writing in a non-standard Greek variety: Romanized Cypriot Greek in online chat. Writing systems research 2: 155–168.Google Scholar

Thomas, W. and Collier, V.. 2002. A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students’ long-term academic achievement. Santa Cruz: Center for Research on Education, Diversity, and Excellence, University of California-Santa Cruz.Google Scholar

Thomson, R. L. 1969. The study of Manx Gaelic. Sir John Rhys memorial lecture. Reprinted from the Proceedings of the British Academy. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tomlinson, Harry. 1994. The teaching of Guernsey French. Unpublished MEd dissertation, University of Wales.Google Scholar

Tomlinson, Harry. 2008. A descriptive grammar of Guernsey French: With phonetic pronunciation guide and verb tables. Guernsey: The Author.Google Scholar

Tomlinson, Hazel (ed.). 2006. P’tites lures Guernaisiaises: A collection of short stories in Guernsey-French and English. Guernsey: The Author.Google Scholar

Tomlinson, Hazel. 2009. Histouaires Guernesiaises: Factual articles and fictional stories in Guernsey-French with English translations. Guernsey: Author.Google Scholar

Traill, A. 1974. The complete guide to the Koon: A research report on linguistic fieldwork undertaken in Botswana and south west Africa. Johannesburg: African Studies Institute, University of the Witwatersrand.Google Scholar

Traill, A. 1996. ǃKhwa-Ka Hhouiten Hhouiten, ‘The rush of the storm’: The linguistic death of ǀXam. In Skotnes, P. (ed.), Miscast: Negotiating the presence of the Bushmen. Cape Town: University of Cape Town Press, pp. 161–183.Google Scholar

Traill, A. 1999. Extinct: South African Khoisan languages. (CD and booklet). Johannesburg: Department of Linguistics, University of the Witwatersrand.Google Scholar

Trépos, P. 1968. Grammaire bretonne. Rennes: Simon (reprinted 1980, Rennes: Ouest France; new edition 1994 Brest: Brud Nevez).Google Scholar

Trudgill, P. 1992. Ausbau sociolinguistics and the perception of language status in contemporary Europe. International journal of applied linguistics 2: 167–177.Google Scholar

Tseliga, T. 2007. ‘It’s all Greeklish to me!’ Linguistic and sociocultural perspectives on Roman-alphabeted Greek in asynchronous computer-mediated communication. In Danet, B. and Herring, S. (eds.), The multilingual internet. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 116–141Google Scholar

Tufi, S. 2013. Language ideology and language maintenance: The case of Sardinia. International journal of the sociology of language 219: 145–160.Google Scholar

UNESCO. 2000. Dakar framework for action, education for all: Meeting our collective commitments. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar

UNESCO. 2003a. Language vitality and endangerment. Document adopted by the International Expert Meeting on UNESCO Programme Safeguarding of Endangered Languages, Paris, 10–12 March 2003. Available online at www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/pdf/Language_vitality_and_endangerment_EN.pdf (last accessed 31 March 2015).Google Scholar

UNESCO. 2003b. Intangible heritage. Available online at www.unesco.org/culture/heritage/intangible/meetings/paris_march2003.shtml (last accessed 4 July 2015).Google Scholar

UNESCO. 2006. Literacy for life. Education for all global monitoring report. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar

UNESCO. 2007a. Improving the quality of mother tongue-based literacy and learning Case studies from Asia, Africa and South America. Bangkok: UNESCO. Available online at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0017/001777/177738e.pdf (last accessed 31 March 2015).Google Scholar

UNESCO. 2007b. Advocacy kit for promoting multilingual education: Including the excluded. Bangkok: UNESCO. Available online at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001521/152198e.pdf and www.unescobkk.org/education/multilingual-education/resources/mle-advocacy-kit/ (last accessed 31 March 2015).Google Scholar

UNESCO. 2007c. Promoting mother tongue-based multilingual education. (DVD). Bangkok: UNESCO. Available online at www.unescobkk.org/education/multilingual-education/resources/mle-advocacy-kit/ and www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLBEF42A5FE8BE02B1 (last accessed 31 March 2015).Google Scholar

United Nations. 2016. Sustainable development knowledge platform. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Available online at https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/ (last accessed on 26 September 2016).Google Scholar

Unseth, P. 2008. The sociolinguistics of script choice. International journal for the sociology of language 192: 1–4.Google Scholar

Valdovinos, M. 2015. From policies to practice: The complexity of mediating interactions in Náayeri public education (Nayarit, México). In Jones, M. C. (ed.), Policy and planning for endangered languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 80–92.Google Scholar

Valdovinos, M. and Kim, Y.. 2014. The interaction of laryngealized vowels, stress, and falling pitch in Mariteco Cora. In Bennett, R., Dockum, R., Gasser, E., Goldberg, D., Kasak, R., and Patterson, P. (eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on the Sound Systems of Mexico and Central America. Available online at http://ling.yale.edu/ssmca-proceedings (last accessed 4 July 2015).Google Scholar

Vamarasi, M. 2008. The critical role of language in the construction of Rotuman diasporic identity. International journal for the sociology of language 192: 69–73.Google Scholar

Van Dyken, J. and Kutsch Lojenga, C.. 1993. Word boundaries: Key factors in orthography development/Les frontières du mot: facteurs-clés dans le développement d’une orthographe. In Hartell, R. (ed.), Alphabets of Africa/Alphabets de langues africaines. Dakar, Senegal: UNESCO and SIL.Google Scholar

Vázquez, V. 2002. El conejo. Un cuento de la región cora (Nayarit). Versión bilingüe. Revista de literaturas populares 2(1): 5–33.Google Scholar

Venezky, R. L. 1970. Principles for the design of practical writing systems. Anthropological linguistics 12(7): 256–270.Google Scholar

Vetter, E. 1953. Handbuch der italischen Dialekte. Heidelberg: C. Winter Universtitätsverlag.Google Scholar

Vikør, L. S. 1993. Principles of corpus planning as applied to the spelling reforms of Indonesia and Malaysia. In Jahr, E. H. (ed.), Language conflict and language planning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 279–298.Google Scholar

Virdis, M. 1978. Fonetica del dialetto sardo campidanese. Cagliari: Edizioni della Torre.Google Scholar

Visser, H. 2001. Naro dictionary: Naro–English, English–Naro. D’Kar, Botswana: Naro Language Project.Google Scholar

Wagner, J. 2002. Commons in transition: An analysis of social and ecological change in a coastal rainforest environment in Papua New Guinea. Unpublished PhD dissertation, McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar

Wagner, M. L. 1941. Historische Lautlehre des Sardischen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Wagner, M. L. 1997 [1950]. La lingua sarda, storia spirito e forma. Nuoro: Ilisso.Google Scholar

Wallace, C. 1992. Reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wallace, R. E. 2004. Sabellian languages. In Woodard, R. D. (ed.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of the world’s ancient languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 812–839.Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A. 2008. Rome’s cultural revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Walter, S. and Chuo, K.. 2012. The Kom experimental mother tongue education pilot project report for 2012. Unpublished research report. SIL Cameroon.Google Scholar

Walter, S. and Dekker, D.. 2008. The Lubuagan mother tongue education experiment (FLC): A Report of comparative results. Available online at www.sil.org/asia/philippines/lit/2008%2D02-27_Report_to_Congress-Lubuagan_FLC_Paper.pdf (last accessed 31 March 2015).Google Scholar

Walter, S., Dekker, D., Duguiang, N., and Camacam, R. Dumatog. 2008. Improving student competence in Filipino and English: The crucial role of the first language in education. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Warren, K. B. 1998. Indigenous movements and their critics: Pan-Maya activism in Guatemala. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Watson, S. 1989. Scottish and Irish Gaelic: The giant’s bed-fellows. In Dorian, N. C. (ed.), Investigating obsolescence: Studies in language contraction and death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 41–59.Google Scholar

Wertheim, S. 2012. Reclamation, revalorization, and re-Tartarization via changing Tatar orthographies. In Jaffe, A., Androutsopoulos, J., Sebba, M., and Johnson, S. (eds.), Orthography as social action: Scripts, spelling, identity, and power. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 65–102.Google Scholar

Westphal, E. O. J. 1953–1971. ŋǀɦuki/Nǀhuki (BC 1143 C12). Unpublished manuscripts. Cape Town: Westphal Holdings, UCT Special Collections, UCT Archives and Libraries, University of Cape Town.Google Scholar

Westphal, E. O. J. 1971. The click languages of southern and eastern Africa. In Berry, J. and Greenberg, J. H. (eds.), Linguistics in sub-Saharan Africa. (Current trends in linguistics 7). The Hague and Paris: Mouton, pp. 367–420.Google Scholar

Sr. White Hat, A. 1999. Reading and writing the Lakota language. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar

Wimmer, A. and Schiller, N. Glick. 2002. Methodological nationalism and beyond: Nation-state building, migration and the social sciences. Global networks 2: 301–334.Google Scholar

Wisdom, C. 1940. The Chorti Indians of Guatemala. Guatemala: Editorial José de Pineda Ibarra.Google Scholar

Wisdom, C. 1950. Material on the Chorti language. (Microfilm collection of manuscripts on Meso-American cultural anthropology 28). Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Wise, M. R. 2014. A Yanesha’ alphabet for the electronic age. In Cahill, M. and Rice, K. (eds.), Developing orthographies for unwritten languages. Dallas, TX: SIL International, pp. 191–209.Google Scholar

Wmffre, I. 2007. Breton orthographies and dialects: The twentieth-century orthography war in Brittany. 2 volumes. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Woolard, K. A. 1998. Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In Schieffelin, B. B., Woolard, K. A., and Kroskrity, P. V. (eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–47.Google Scholar

Woolard, K. A. and Schieffelin, B. B.. 1994. Language ideology. Annual review of anthropology 23: 55–82.Google Scholar

Wright, S. (ed.). 2004a. Multilingualism on the internet. International journal of multicultural societies 6(1). Available online at www.unesco.org/shs/ijms/vol6/issue1 (last accessed 27 March 2015).Google Scholar

Wright, S. 2004b. Language policy and language planning: From nationalism to globalization. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Zair, N. 2013. Individualism in ‘Osco-Greek’ orthography. In Wagner, E.-M., Outhwaite, B., and Beinhoff, B. (eds.), Scribes as agents of language change. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 217–26.Google Scholar

Zair, N. 2016. Oscan in the Greek alphabet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Zaretsky, E. and Schwartz, M. 2014. Cross-linguistic transfer in reading in multilingual contexts – recent research trends. Written language and literacy, 17(1): vii–ix.Google Scholar

Ziervogel, D. 1955. Notes on the language of the Eastern Transvaal Bushmen. In Potgieter, E. F. (ed.), The disappearing Bushmen of Lake Chrissie. Pretoria: Van Schaik, 35–63.Google Scholar