Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T06:22:37.833Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 2 - Unfamiliar face recognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2012

Caroline Wilkinson
Affiliation:
University of Dundee
Christopher Rynn
Affiliation:
University of Dundee
Get access

Summary

Introduction

‘Unfamiliar face recognition’ here means the task of recognising someone previously unfamiliar, usually seen only once before. The classic test methodology is to show a sequence of face images and later ask which of a larger set were shown before, but this chapter will also consider face matching, where two or more faces are presented simultaneously. This is one of the more common practical applications, for identity verification. Every time a photo-ID is presented, such as a passport, someone has to match the photograph to the person in front of them. The specific issue of identification parades, where an unfamiliar person has been seen and identification is later attempted from a line-up, is addressed in Chapter 9.

Mostly, face recognition appears effortless, which it usually is, for people that we know well. Where individuals claim to be bad at face recognition, they usually mean that they fail to recognise someone seen perhaps only once before, which is embarrassing, especially if they have recognised you. There is in fact wide variation in ability, from those unable to recognise even highly familiar people, to a few who can recognise someone seen only once, some years earlier (Russell et al., 2009).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Afraz, A.Cavanagh, P. 2009 The gender-specific face aftereffect is based in retinotopic not spatiotopic coordinates across several natural image transformationsJournal of Vision 9 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anastasi, J. S.Rhodes, M. G. 2005 An own-age bias in face recognition for children and older adultsPsychonomic Bulletin and Review 12 10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernstein, M. J.Young, S. G.Hugenberg, K. 2007 The cross-category effect: Mere social categorization is sufficient to elicit an own-group bias in face recognitionPsychological Science 18 706CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bestelmeyer, P. E. G.Jones, B. C.DeBruine, L. M. 2008 Sex-contingent face aftereffects depend on perceptual category rather than structural encodingCognition 107 353CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonner, L.Burton, A. M. 2004 7–11-year-old children show an advantage for matching and recognizing the internal features of familiar faces: Evidence against a developmental shiftQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology 57 1019CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourne, V. J.Vladeanu, M.Hole, G. J. 2009 Lateralised repetition priming for featurally and configurally manipulated familiar faces: Evidence for differentially lateralised processing mechanismsLaterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition 14 287CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks, K. R.Kemp, R. I. 2007 Sensitivity to feature displacement in familiar and unfamiliar faces: Beyond the internal/external feature distinctionPerception 36 1646CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruce, V. 1982 Changing faces: visual and non-visual coding processes in face recognitionBritish Journal of Psychology 73 105CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruce, V.Burton, A. M.Dench, N. 1994 What’s distinctive about a distinctive faceQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology 47 119CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruce, V.Henderson, Z.Greenwood, K. 1999 Verification of face identities from images captured on videoJournal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 5 339Google Scholar
Bruce, V.Henderson, Z.Newman, C.Burton, A. M. 2001 Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV imagesJournal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 7 207Google ScholarPubMed
Burton, A. M.White, D.McNeill, A. 2010 The Glasgow Face Matching TestBehavior Research Methods 42 286CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, R.Coleman, M.Walker, J. 1999 When does the inner-face advantage in familiar face recognition arise and whyVisual-Cognition 6 197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbon, C.Strobach, T.Langton, S. 2007 Adaptation effects of highly familiar faces: immediate and long lastingMemory and Cognition 35 1966CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, W.Liu, C. H. 2009 Transfer between pose and expression training in face recognitionVision Research 49 368CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christie, F.Bruce, V. 1998 The role of dynamic information in the recognition of unfamiliar facesMemory and Cognition 26 780CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costen, N. P.Parker, D. M.Craw, I. 1996 Effects of high-pass and low-pass spatial filtering on face identificationPerception and Psychophysics 58 602CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crookes, K.McKone, E. 2009 Early maturity of face recognition: No childhood development of holistic processing, novel face encoding, or face-spaceCognition 111 219CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dakin, S. C.Watt, R. J. 2009 Biological “bar codes” in human facesJournal of Vision 9 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deffenbacher, K. A.Johanson, J.Vetter, T.O’Toole, A. J. 2000 The face typicality-recognizability relationship: encoding or retrieval locusMemory and Cognition 28 1173CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Heering, A.de Liedekerke, C.Deboni, M.Rossion, B. 2010 The role of experience during childhood in shaping the other-race effectDevelopmental Science 13 181CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duchaine, B. C.Nakayama, K. 2006 The Cambridge Face Memory Test: results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participantsNeuropsychologia 44 576CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duchaine, B. C.Weidenfeld, A. 2003 An evaluation of two commonly used tests of unfamiliar face recognitionNeuropsychologia 41 713CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, H. D.Shepherd, J. W.Davies, G. M. 1979 Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: some implications for theories of face recognitionPerception 8 431CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galper, R. E. 1970 Recognition of faces in photographic negativePsychonomic Science 19 207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, I.Skudlarski, P.Gore, J.Anderson, A. 2000 Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognitionNature Neuroscience 3 191CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gobbini, M.Leibenluft, E.Santiago, N.Haxby, J. V. 2004 Social and emotional attachment in the neural representation of facesNeuroimage 22 1628CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goffaux, V.Hault, B.Michel, C.Vuong, Q. C.Rossion, B. 2005 The respective role of low and high spatial frequencies in supporting configural and featural processing of facesPerception 34 77CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goffaux, V.Rossion, B. 2007 Face inversion disproportionately impairs the perception of vertical but not horizontal relations between featuresJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 33 995Google Scholar
Gregory, R. L. 1970 The Intelligent EyeLondonWeidenfeld and NicolsonGoogle Scholar
Hancock, P. J. B.Burton, A. M.Bruce, V. 1996 Face processing: human perception and principal components analysisMemory and Cognition 24 26CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, V.Hole, G. J. 2009 Evidence for a contact-based explanation of the own-age bias in face recognitionPsychonomic Bulletin and Review 16 264CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haxby, J. V.Hoffman, E.Gobbini, M. 2000 The distributed human neural system for face perceptionTrends in Cognitive Sciences 4 223CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, H.Bruce, V. 1996 Effects of lighting on the perception of facial surfacesJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22 986Google ScholarPubMed
Hirose, Y.Hancock, P. J. B. 2007 Equally attending but still not seeing: an eye-tracking study of change detection in own- and other-race facesVisual Cognition 15 647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hole, G. J. 1994 Configurational factors in the perception of unfamiliar facesPerception 23 65CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humphreys, G.Hodsoll, J.Campbell, C. 2005 Attending but not seeing: the ‘other race’ effect in face and person perception studied through change blindnessVisual Cognition 12 249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, X.Rosen, E.Zeffiro, T. 2006 Evaluation of a shape-based model of human face discrimination using fMRI and behavioral techniquesNeuron 50 159CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnston, A.Hill, H.Carman, N. 1992 Recognising faces: effects of lighting direction, inversion, and brightness reversalPerception 21 365CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, D.Quinn, P.Slater, A. 2007 The other-race effect develops during infancy – evidence of perceptual narrowingPsychological Science 18 1084CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kemp, R.Pike, G.White, P.Musselman, A. 1996 Perception and recognition of normal and negative faces: the role of shape from shading and pigmentation cuesPerception 25 37CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kemp, R.Towell, N.Pike, G. 1997 When seeing should not be believing: photographs, credit cards and fraudApplied Cognitive Psychology 11 2113.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krouse, F. L. 1981 Effects of pose, pose change, and delay on face recognition performanceJournal of Applied Psychology 66 651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lander, K.Bruce, V. 2003 The role of motion in learning new facesVisual Cognition 10 897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leder, H.Bruce, V. 2000 When inverted faces are recognised: the role of configural information in face recognitionQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 53A 513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M. D.Vast, R. L.Butavicius, M. A. 2006 Face matching under time pressure and task demandsProceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society1675Google Scholar
Lewis, M. B. 2006 Eye-witnesses should not do cryptic crosswords prior to identity paradesPerception 35 1433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M. B.Johnston, R. A. 1997 Familiarity, target set and false positives in face recognitionEuropean Journal of Cognitive Psychology 9 437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Light, L. L.Kayra Stuart, F.Hollander, S. 1979 Recognition memory for typical and unusual facesJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 5 212Google ScholarPubMed
Little, A. C.DeBruine, L. M.Jones, B. C. 2005 Sex-contingent face after-effects suggest distinct neural populations code male and female facesProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 272 2283CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, C. H.Chaudhuri, A. 2003 Face recognition with perspective transformationVision Research 43 2393CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, C. H.Ward, J. 2006 The use of 3D information in face recognitionVision Research 46 768CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacLin, O. H.Malpass, R. S. 2001 Racial categorization of faces: the ambiguous race face effectPsychology, Public Policy, and Law 7 98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macrae, C. N.Lewis, H. L. 2002 Do I know you? Processing orientation and face recognitionPsychological Science 13 194CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malone, D. R.Morris, H. H.Kay, M. C.Levin, H. S. 1982 Prosopagnosia: a double dissociation between the recognition of familiar and unfamiliar facesJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 45 820CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McIntyre, A.Hancock, P. J. B.Kittler, J.
McIntyre, A.Hancock, P. J. B.Kittler, J.
Megreya, A.Burton, A. M. 2006 Unfamiliar faces are not faces: evidence from a matching taskMemory and Cognition 34 865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meissner, C. A.Brigham, J. C. 2001 Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: a meta-analytic reviewPsychology, Public Policy, and Law 7 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Memon, A.Bartlett, J.Rose, R.Gray, C. 2003 The aging eyewitness: effects of age on face, delay, and source-memory abilityJournals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 58 338CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ng, M.Ciaramitaro, V. M.Anstis, S.Boynton, G. M.Fine, I. 2006 Selectivity for the configural cues that identify the gender, ethnicity, and identity of faces in human cortexProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103 19552CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Toole, A. J.Edelman, S.Bulthoff, H. H. 1998 Stimulus-specific effects in face recognition over changes in viewpointVision Research 38 2351CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Toole, A. J.Roark, D. A.Abdi, H. 2002 Recognizing moving faces: a psychological and neural synthesisTrends in Cognitive Sciences 6 261CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perfect, T. J. 2003 Local processing bias impairs lineup performancePsychological Reports 93 393CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, P.Wechsler, H.Huang, J.Rauss, P. 1998 The Feret database and evaluation procedure for face-recognition algorithmsImage and Vision Computing 16 295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, G. E.Kemp, R. I.Towell, N. A.Phillips, K. C. 1997 Recognizing moving faces: the relative contribution of motion and perspective view informationVisual Cognition 4 409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, G.Jeffery, L.Watson, T. 2004 Orientation-contingent face aftereffects and implications for face-coding mechanismsCurrent Biology 14 2119CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riesenhuber, M.Jarudi, I.Gilad, S.Sinha, P. 2004 Face processing in humans is compatible with a simple shape-based model of visionProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 271 S448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riesenhuber, M.Wolff, B. S. 2009 Task effects, performance levels, features, configurations, and holistic face processing: a reply to RossionActa Psychologica 132 286CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossion, B. 2008 Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perceptionActa Psychologica 128 274CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossion, B. 2009 Distinguishing the cause and consequence of face inversion: the perceptual field hypothesisActa Psychologica 132 300CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossion, B.Boremanse, A. 2008 Nonlinear relationship between holistic processing of individual faces and picture-plane rotation: evidence from the face composite illusionJournal of Vision 8 113CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruiz-Soler, M.Beltran, F. S. 2006 Face perception: an integrative review of the role of spatial frequenciesPsychological Research/Psychologische Forschung 70 273CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, R.Biederman, I.Nederhouser, M.Sinha, P. 2007 The utility of surface reflectance for the recognition of upright and inverted facesVision Research 47 157CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, R.Duchaine, B. C.Nakayama, K. 2009 Super-recognizers: people with extraordinary face recognition abilityPsychonomic Bulletin and Review 16 252CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, R.Sinha, P.Biederman, I.Nederhouser, M. 2006 Is pigmentation important for face recognition? Evidence from contrast negationPerception 35 749CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sangrigoli, S.Pallier, C.Argenti, A.Ventureyra, V.de Schonen, S. 2005 Reversibility of the other-race effect in face recognition during childhoodPsychological Science 16 440Google ScholarPubMed
Schooler, J. W.Engstler-Schooler, T. Y. 1990 Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: some things are better left unsaidCognitive Psychology 22 36CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwaninger, A.Wallraven, C.Bulthoff, H. 2004 Computational modeling of face recognition based on psychophysical experimentsSwiss Journal of Psychology 63 207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searcy, J. H.Bartlett, J. C. 1996 Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information in facesJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22 904Google ScholarPubMed
Sekuler, A. B.Gaspar, C. M.Gold, J. M.Bennett, P. J. 2004 Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processingCurrent Biology 14 391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sporer, S. L. 2001 Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: an integration of theoriesPsychology, Public Policy, and Law 7 36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, P. 1980 Margaret Thatcher: a new illusionPerception 9 483CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webster, M. A.MacLin, O. H. 1999 Figural aftereffects in the perception of facesPsychonomic Bulletin and Review 6 647CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wickham, L. H. V.Morris, P. E.Fritz, C. O. 2000 Facial distinctiveness: its measurement, distribution and influence on immediate and delayed recognitionBritish Journal of Psychology 91 99CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkinson, C.Evans, R. 2009 Are facial image analysis experts any better than the general public at identifying individuals from CCTV imagesScience and Justice 49 191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, D. B.Stroud, J. N. 2002 Age differences in lineup identification accuracy: people are better with their own ageLaw and Human Behavior 26 641CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, A. W.Hellawell, D.Hay, D. C. 1987 Configurational information in face perceptionPerception 16 747CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yovel, G. 2009 The shape of facial features and the spacing among them generate similar inversion effects: a reply to Rossion (2008)Acta Psychologica 132 293CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×