Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-07T22:09:19.552Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Crafting strategy as a practice of embodied recursive enactment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2011

Loizos Heracleous
Affiliation:
University of Warwick
Claus D. Jacobs
Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

Before elaborating our approach of crafting strategy and drawing on Sennett's (2008) recent analysis, we first reflect on the notion of craftsmanship in a socio-cultural context. Then and in extending the metaphorical view of strategy as craft, we conceptualize crafting as an actual practice of strategy. Situating our approach within the practice-based view of strategy (e.g. Jarzabkowski, 2005; Whittington, 2006), we discuss how integrating three foundational domains, namely physiological, psychological and social constructionist perspectives, lead us to conceptualize crafting strategy as embodied recursive enactment. We demonstrate this conceptualization through the case of strategy work at Orange UK in the early 2000s.

“Making is thinking” – reflections on craftsmanship from a cultural materialist perspective

Crafting as the skill of making things well

While traditionally we associate craftsmanship with a pre-industrial, manual worker involved in making singular objects, such as a medieval carpenter, Sennett refers to craftsmanship more generally as “the skill of making things well” (2008: 8). In his compelling analysis, he acknowledges the relevance of crafting technique, but beyond this considers craftsmanship as “an enduring, basic human impulse, the desire to do a job well for its own sake” (2008: 9). Such an impulse is not limited to ancient manual workers but similarly applies to such diverse occupations as contemporary artists, doctors, laboratory technicians or computer programmers, or such different domains as bricklaying, cooking, playing the piano or analyzing a chemical substance.

Type
Chapter
Information
Crafting Strategy
Embodied Metaphors in Practice
, pp. 65 - 89
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bourdieu, P. 1990. The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. 1991. Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1): 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buergi, P., Jacobs, C., and Roos, J. 2005. From metaphor to practice in the crafting of strategy. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14 (1): 78–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Certeau, M. 1984. The practice of everyday life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gergen, K. 1994. Reality and relationships: Soundings in social construction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Gergen, K. 1999. An invitation to social construction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Gherardi, S. 2000. Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations. Organization, 7(2): 211–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R.W. 2005. Embodiment and cognitive science. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, K. R. and Ingold, T. (eds.), 1993. Tools, language and cognition in human evolution. Cambridge University Press.
Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Hadar, U., Wenkert-Olenik, D., Krauss, R., and Soroker, N. 1998. Gesture and the processing of speech: Neuropsychological evidence. Brain and Language, 62, 107–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harel, I. and Papert, S. (eds.), 1991. Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Hendry, J. and Seidl, D. 2003. The structure and significance of strategic episodes: Social systems theory and the routine practices of strategic change. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1): 175–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. 2005. Strategy as practice: An activity-based approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J., and Seidl, D. 2007. Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective. Human Relations, 60(1): 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G., Melin, L., and Whittington, R. 2003. Micro strategy and strategising: Towards an activity-based view. Journal of Management Studies, 40 (1): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G., Langley, A., Melin, L., and Whittington, R. 2007. Strategy as practice: Research directions and resources. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauss, R. M. 1998. Why do we gesture when we speak?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 54–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauss, R. M., Chen, Y., and Gottesman, R. F. 2000. Lexical gestures and lexical access: A process model. In McNeil, D. (ed.), Language and gesture. New York: Cambridge University Press, 261–83.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Miller, P. and Hopwood, A. G. 1994 (eds.), Accounting as social and institutional practice. Cambridge University Press.
Mintzberg, H. 1987. Crafting strategy. Harvard Business Review, 65(4), 66–75.Google Scholar
Molloy, E. and Whittington, R. 2005. Organising organising: the practice inside the process, Advances in Strategic Management, 22: 491–515.Google Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. 2000. Using technology and constituting structure: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4): 404–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. 1971. Biology and knowledge. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schatzki, T.R. 2001. Introduction: Practice Theory. In Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K., and Savigny, E. (eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory. New York: Routledge, 1–14.Google Scholar
Sennett, R. 2008. The craftsman. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Tattersall, I. 1998. Becoming human: Evolution and human uniqueness. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Weick, K. 1987. Substitutes for strategy. In Teece, D. J. (ed.), The competitive challenge: Strategies for industrial renewal. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 221–33.Google Scholar
Whittington, R. 2006. Completing the practice turn in strategy reseach. Organization Studies, 26: 613–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, F. 1998. The hand: How its use shapes the brain, language, and human culture. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×