Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- List of maps
- Preface and acknowledgments
- 1 A “happy combination of clemency with firmness”: the small wars prologue
- 2 The road from Sedan
- 3 The paroxysms of imperial might in the shadow of the Great War
- 4 From Tipperary to Tel Aviv: British counterinsurgency in the World War II era
- 5 From small wars to la guerre subversive: the radicalization and collapse of French counterinsurgency
- 6 Vietnam, counterinsurgency, and the American way of war
- 7 “A conspiracy of heroes”: revolution and counterinsurgency in Latin America
- 8 Building the “most successful counterinsurgency school”: COIN as the British way of war
- 9 Britain’s Thirty Years’ War in Northern Ireland
- 10 Vietnam with a happy ending: Iraq and “the surge”
- 11 Conclusion
- Notes
- Select bibliography
- Index
11 - Conclusion
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- List of maps
- Preface and acknowledgments
- 1 A “happy combination of clemency with firmness”: the small wars prologue
- 2 The road from Sedan
- 3 The paroxysms of imperial might in the shadow of the Great War
- 4 From Tipperary to Tel Aviv: British counterinsurgency in the World War II era
- 5 From small wars to la guerre subversive: the radicalization and collapse of French counterinsurgency
- 6 Vietnam, counterinsurgency, and the American way of war
- 7 “A conspiracy of heroes”: revolution and counterinsurgency in Latin America
- 8 Building the “most successful counterinsurgency school”: COIN as the British way of war
- 9 Britain’s Thirty Years’ War in Northern Ireland
- 10 Vietnam with a happy ending: Iraq and “the surge”
- 11 Conclusion
- Notes
- Select bibliography
- Index
Summary
This book has made several arguments: First, the claim that COIN constitutes a separate category of warfare, one made at least since the 1840s by generations of small wars enthusiasts, is contentious at best. The assertion that COIN be considered in its own conflict category is rooted in a rejection of the Clausewitzian character of war in favor of a Jominian posture of determinism with tactics and operational methods (grand tactics), or a half-baked culturalist or meta-anthropological approach substituting for a cohesive, balanced policy and strategy rooted in sound constitutional practice and statecraft. Tactically and operationally, colonial warfare, of which COIN is the lineal descendant, required forces designed for mobility, an aptitude for independent small-unit actions, and the ability to master logistical challenges over great distances. Its adherents were and continue to be tacticians who eschew the imponderables of war made up of politics and mass psychology. Beyond these order of battle prescriptions, the hearts and minds methods of the nineteenth century based on the self-advertised cultural knowledge required for the peaceful penetration and governance of colonial territories boiled down to nothing more than the application of an Orientalized Western view of indigenous societies as immutable tribal affiliations that had either to be “improved” or preserved from contamination, depending on the political views of the respective officer-administrator. COIN writings of both the mid twentieth and the twenty-first centuries have followed these nineteenth-century trailblazers to a remarkable degree, in that they emphasize the political character of their population-centric, information warfare, Phase IV/Stability Operations, hearts and minds, aid to the civil power, and so on, tactics. But like their imperial predecessors, contemporary COIN-dinistas are basically romantics, whose strategic communications target politics and society at home while they profess to apply paternalistic theories onto biddable populations required to show gratitude for their improved conditions by outing pistoleros, bandits, terrorists, and insurgents in their midst.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- CounterinsurgencyExposing the Myths of the New Way of War, pp. 318 - 346Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013