Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Epigraphy
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- Map
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction: Towards a Counter-History of the Mission Pueblo
- 1 The War of Peace and Legacy of Social Anomie
- 2 Monastic Rule and the Mission As Frontier(ization) Institution
- 3 Stagings of Spiritual Conquest
- 4 Miracles and Monsters in the Consolidation of Mission-Towns
- 5 Our Lady of Contingency
- 6 Reversions to Native Custom in Fr. Antonio de Borja’s Barlaan at Josaphat and Gaspar Aquino de Belen’s Mahal na Pasion
- 7 Colonial Racism and the Moro-Moro As Dueling Proxies of Law
- Conclusion: The Promise of Law
- Bibliography
- Index
1 - The War of Peace and Legacy of Social Anomie
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 February 2024
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Epigraphy
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- Map
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction: Towards a Counter-History of the Mission Pueblo
- 1 The War of Peace and Legacy of Social Anomie
- 2 Monastic Rule and the Mission As Frontier(ization) Institution
- 3 Stagings of Spiritual Conquest
- 4 Miracles and Monsters in the Consolidation of Mission-Towns
- 5 Our Lady of Contingency
- 6 Reversions to Native Custom in Fr. Antonio de Borja’s Barlaan at Josaphat and Gaspar Aquino de Belen’s Mahal na Pasion
- 7 Colonial Racism and the Moro-Moro As Dueling Proxies of Law
- Conclusion: The Promise of Law
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Acaso el verbo pacificar significase hacer guerra
— José Rizal, in Antonio de Morga, Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas, xxxivAbstract: This chapter analyzes the euphemisms of peace and pacification by examining the role they played in the legal rhetoric of conquest. This rhetoric reflects how the conquest and colonization of the Philippines actually happened; and that its unfolding in most respects did not differ from the conquest and colonization of the Americas. What was different, however, was the way the Spaniards insisted on remembering the conquest; specifically, through a quasi-legal framework that recorded the conquest as inseparable from the legitimacy of Spanish rule overseas. The discourse of pacification masked the permanence of conquest measures (invasion, plunder, impunity) as well as a state of social anomie on the missionary frontier.
Keywords: pacification, depopulation, incursion [entrada], fugitives / fugitivism [remontado, cimarrón, mundo, vagabundo, tulisan], settlement [población], 1582 Synod of Manila.
One may credit Dr. José Rizal (1861–1896) for being the first to systematically investigate and question the history of colonial Spanish rule in the Philippines as it had been recounted by Spaniards since the time of the conquest. His inquiry opens our own, because it was the first to speculate on the possibility that Spanish rule [dominio] in its overseas frontier colony was, in fact, a fiction. Rizal's original intention (in 1888) was to write a book on Philippine history: lack of resources and time forced him to settle for republishing (with extensive annotations) the first history of the Philippines not written by a religious missionary. The work in question, Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas [Historical Events of the Philippine Islands] was originally published in 1609 by colonial high court official [oídor] Antonio de Morga; and dealt with the first thirty-odd years of Spanish rule in the Philippines following the period of conquest and treaties between Admiral Miguel López de Legazpi and various native chiefs throughout the islands. Yet the length, detail, and oftentimes exasperated tone of Rizal's annotations upstage the presentation of the original text: boldly calling into question the truthfulness of colonial histories and documents as a whole. One such annotation by Rizal, which he repeats later in another footnote, serves as the epigraph to this work:
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Counter-Hispanization in the Colonial PhilippinesLiterature, Law, Religion, and Native Custom, pp. 49 - 78Publisher: Amsterdam University PressPrint publication year: 2023