Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T22:47:11.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

b - Rethinking Workplace Resistance: Between Revolt and Co-Optation

from 9 - Corporations and Resistance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2017

Roland Paulsen
Affiliation:
Lund University
Grietje Baars
Affiliation:
City University London
Andre Spicer
Affiliation:
City University London
Get access

Summary

Viewing the capitalist corporation as an efficient machine, as the epiphany of instrumental rationality, is as old as the corporation itself and can be traced to all classics of social science including Adam Smith, Karl Marx, Max Weber, Émile Durkheim, and Jürgen Habermas. The continual decrease of production costs and the ever-evolving management of workers and their performance seem to warrant maximal output with minimum output. But is the corporation really as rational as we would like to believe? And has the promise of managing work to the utmost ever succeeded?

Consider the phenomenon of empty labour, or private activities during working hours. According to the surveys that have been done on empty labour, we are today spending an average of 1.5 to 3 hours a day slacking off at work. Sometimes this slacking is due to inevitable periods of wait and downtime, but much of it stems from the active withdrawal of the worker. Employees may avoid work because they find it strenuous, meaningless, a waste of time, or because they are too bored to even care (Paulsen, 2014). Some of the most extreme examples include a British insurance employee who for six years did no more than the equivalence of six months’ work (Bolchover, 2005).

Consider the widespread practice of workplace theft. According to The Global Retail Barometer, American retail staff are out-stealing thieves coming from outside the firms. Employees account for 43 per cent of lost revenues, whereas shoplifters account for 37 per cent. Most employee theft takes place by the cash register through cancelations of transactions that ought not to be cancelled, or through the issuing of illicit refunds. In 2013, this particular type of employee theft made up an estimated lost in US retail revenue of $18 billion (Pinsker, 2014). Needless to say, there are other types of employee theft taking place in all trades and at all organization levels (see especially Mars, 1982).

Type
Chapter
Information
The Corporation
A Critical, Multi-Disciplinary Handbook
, pp. 488 - 496
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackroyd, S., and Thompson, P. (1999) Organizational Misbehaviour (London: Sage).
Barker, J. R. (1993) ‘Tightening the iron cage: concertive control in self-managing teams’, Administrative Science Quarterly 38(3): 408–437.Google Scholar
Bolchover, D. (2005) The Living Dead: Switched Off, Zoned Out: The Shocking Truth about Office Life (Chichester: Capstone).
Brown, G. (1977) Sabotage: A Study in Industrial Conflict (Nottingham: Spokesman).
Burawoy, M. (1979) Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process under Monopoly Capitalism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Burawoy, M., and Lukács, J. (1992) The Radiant Past: Ideology and Reality in Hungary's Road to Capitalism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Casey, C. (1995) Work, Self and Society: After Industrialism (London: Sage).
Cederström, C., and Fleming, P. (2012) Dead Man Working (Winchester and Washington, DC: Zero Books).
Contu, A. (2008) ‘Decaf resistance’, Management Communication Quarterly 21(3): 364–379.Google Scholar
Cooke, H. (2006) ‘Seagull management and the control of nursing work’, Work, Employment and Society 20(2): 223–243.Google Scholar
Dubois, P. (1979) Sabotage in Industry (New York: Penguin Books).
Fleming, P. (2005a) ‘“Kindergarten Cop”: paternalism and resistance in a high-commitment workplace’, Journal of Management Studies 42(7): 1469–1489.Google Scholar
Fleming, P. (2005b) ‘Workers’ playtime?: Boundaries and cynicism in a “culture of fun” program’, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 41(3): 285–303.Google Scholar
Fleming, P., and Sewell, G. (2002) ‘Looking for the good soldier, Švejk’, Sociology 36(4): 857–73.Google Scholar
Fleming, P., and Spicer, A. (2003) ‘Working at a cynical distance: implications for power, subjectivity and resistance’, Organization 10(1): 157–179.Google Scholar
Fleming, P., and Spicer, A. (2007) Contesting the Corporation: Struggle, Power and Resistance in Organizations (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press).
Fleming, P., and Spicer, A. (2008) ‘Beyond power and resistance’, Management Communication Quarterly 21(3): 301–309.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (London: Allen Lane).
Gossett, L. M., and Kilker, J. (2006) ‘My job sucks’, Management Communication Quarterly 20(1): 63–90.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A. (1988) An Antonio Gramsci reader: Selected Writings, 1916–1935 (New York: Schocken Books).
Grant, D., Keenoy, T., and Oswick, C. (1998) ‘Organizational discourse: of diversity dichotomy and multi-disciplinarity’, in Grant, D., Keenoy, T. and Oswick, C. (eds.), Discourse and Organization (London: Sage), 1–13.
Henle, C. A., and Blanchard, A. L. (2008) ‘The interaction of work stressors and organizational sanctions on cyberloafing’, Journal of Managerial Issues 20(3): 383–400.Google Scholar
Karlsson, J. C. (2012) Organizational Misbehaviour in the Workplace: Narratives of Dignity and Resistance (Basingstoke, UK, and New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
Korczynski, M., Hodson, R., and Edwards, P. K. (2006) Social Theory at Work (Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press).
Kunda, G. (1992) Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation (Philadelphia: Temple University Press).
Levin, A. (2014) ‘Air-traffic sabotage near O'Hare prompts emergency plan revamp’, Bloomberg 25 (11).Google Scholar
Lukes, S. (2005) Power: A Radical View, edn. (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan).
Luxemburg, R, (2008) Reform or Revolution and the Mass Strike (Chicago: Haymarket Books).
Malachowski, D., and Simonini, J. (2006) ‘Wasted time at work still costing companies billions in 2006’, Salary.com, www.salary.com/wasted-time-at-work-still-costing-companies-billions-in-2006.
Mars, G. (1982) Cheats at Work: An Anthology of Workplace Crime (London: Allen & Unwin).
Marsden, R. (1993) ‘The politics of organizational analysis’, Organization Studies 14(1): 93–124.Google Scholar
Mills, J. E., Hu, B., Beldona, S., and Clay, J. (2001) ‘Cyberslacking! A wired-workplace liability issue’, Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly 42(5): 34–47.Google Scholar
Mumby, D. (2005) ‘Theorizing resistance in organization studies’, Management Communication Quarterly 19(1): 19–44.Google Scholar
Ones, D. S., and Viswesvaran, C. (2003) ‘The big-5 personality and counterproductive behaviours’, in Sagie, A., Stashevsky, S. and Koslowsky, M. (eds.), Misbehaviour and Dysfunctional Attitudes in Organizations (New York: Palgrave Macmillan), 211–249.
Paulsen, R. (2014) Empty Labor: Workplace Resistance and Idleness (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Penney, L. M., Spector, P. E., and Fox, S. (2003) ‘Stress, personality and counterproductive work behaviour’, in Sagie, A., Stashevsky, S. and Koslowsky, M., (eds.), Misbehaviour and Dysfunctional Attitudes in Organizations (New York: Palgrave Macmillan), 194–210.
Pinsker, J. (2014) ‘America's workers are out-stealing America's shoplifters’, The Atlantic. 13 (11).Google Scholar
Pouget, É. (1913 [1898]) Sabotage (Chicago: Charles H. Kerr).
Scott, J. C. (1991) Domination and The arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts (London: Yale University Press).
Sewell, G. (2008) ‘The fox and the hedgehog go to work’, Management Communication Quarterly 21(2): 344–363.Google Scholar
Sewell, G., and Wilkinson, B. (1992) ‘“Someone to watch over me”: surveillance, discipline and the just-in-time labour process’, Sociology, 26(2): 271–289.Google Scholar
Solanas, V. (1967) Scum Manifesto (Brooklyn: Pétroleuse Press).
Sprouse, M (1992) Sabotage in the American Workplace: Anecdotes of Dissatisfaction, Mischief, and Revenge, edn. (San Francisco: Pressure Drop Press).
Taplin, I. M. (2006) ‘Managerial resistance to high performance workplace practices’, in Vallas, S. P. (ed.), Research in the Sociology of Work: vol. 10, The Transformation of Work (Amsterdam: JAI): 1–24.
Taylor, F. W. (1919) The Principles of Scientific Management (New York and London: Harper & Brothers).
Taylor, P., and Bain, P. (2003) ‘“Subterranean worksick blues”: humour as subversion in two call centres’, Organization Studies 24(9): 1487–1509.Google Scholar
Thompson, P. (2009) ‘Resisting resistance: moving the debate on’, 27th International Labour Process Conference, Edinburgh.
Townley, B. (1993) Reframing Human Resource Management (London: Sage).
Townley, B. (1997) ‘Beyond good and evil: Foucault and HRM’ in McKinlay, A. and Starkey, K. (eds.), Foucault, Management and Organization Theory: From Panopticon to Technologies of Self (London: Sage), 191–210.
Townsend, K. (2005) ‘Electronic surveillance and cohesive teams: room for resistance in an Australian call centre?’, New Technology, Work and Employment 20(1): 47–59.Google Scholar
Veblen, T. (2001 [1921]) The Engineers and the Price System (Kitchener: Batoche Books).
Vivien, L. K. G., and Thompson, T. S. H. (2005) ‘Prevalence, perceived seriousness, justification and regulation of cyberloafing in Singapore: an exploratory study’, Information and Management 42(8): 1081–1093.Google Scholar
Warren, S., and Fineman, S. (1997) ‘“Don't get me wrong, it's fun here, but … ”: ambivalence and paradox in a “fun” work environment’, in Westwood, R. and Rhodes, C. (eds.), Humour, Work and Organization (London: Routledge), 92–112.
Willmott, H. (1993) ‘Strength is ignorance; slavery is freedom: managing culture in modern organizations’, Journal of Management Studies 30(4): 515–552.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×