Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T23:04:34.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

a - Resisting and Regulating Corporations through Ecologies of Alternative Enterprise: Insurance and Electricity in the US Case

from 10 - Alternatives to the Corporation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2017

Marc Schneiberg
Affiliation:
Reed College
Grietje Baars
Affiliation:
City University London
Andre Spicer
Affiliation:
City University London
Get access

Summary

Little ‘r’ republicanism has proven a resilient animating theme in struggles over corporations and economic order in the United States, with its producerist visions of economic autonomy, self-governing communities and egalitarian, regionally based, small-stakeholder economies of yeoman farmers and independent producers. Indeed, republican–producerist projects of reforming and reconstructing American capitalism have figured centrally in seemingly quite disparate places, ranging from nineteenth- and twentieth-century struggles over banking and railroads, the agrarian revolts and various strands of unionism to the local foods movement and even faith-based organizing (Goodwyn, 1976; Hattam, 1990; Voss, 1993; Berk, 1994; Donohue, 1999; Schneiberg, 2002; Marquis and Lounsbury, 2007). As the Table 37.1 suggests, even in the US, that ‘wellspring of corporate capitalism’, producer groups, farmers, workers, consumers and public officials have been remarkably varied in how they have worked to contest corporations and realize republican aspirations for more decentralized development. These groups have deliberately sought to reform markets and corporations via overlays of organizational control, whether through the regulatory state, in the form of independent commissions or mandatory disclosure, or through private governance, ranging from self-regulatory associations and third-party certification to consumer boycotts and collective bargaining. They have also used state power to directly recompose the architectures of markets and corporations, via anti-trust policies, corporate charter reform, regulation or even (rarely and briefly) nationalization.

This chapter fills out the table by analysing an important but less well appreciated strategy for contesting corporations and reconstructing capitalism along republican lines: working mostly outside central states or formal political institutions to recompose markets directly by organizing parallel systems of cooperative, mutual and local/state-owned enterprise. The heart of this strategy is to complement, compete with or bypass for-profit stock corporations by self-organization among producers or consumers and by cultivating enterprises structured to serve different constituencies and purposes than shareholder value and financial returns for a specialized investor class.

I advance three points in the service of a broader counter-narrative about these alternative forms. First, dismissing cooperatives, mutuals and the like as relics of a small-town agrarian economy long past or as utopian experiments revived in the 1960s, underestimates not only their salience and persistence in American capitalism, but also how they stand with the regulatory state, anti-trust and private governance as vehicles for resisting corporations and pursing distinctively modern projects of development, market-making and revitalization.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Corporation
A Critical, Multi-Disciplinary Handbook
, pp. 512 - 526
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Public Power Association (APPA) (2014–2015) Public Power Annual Directory and Statistical Report.
Anderson, J. L., and Nelson, P. (eds.) (1960) Rural Electric Fact Book (Washington, DC: National Rural Electric Cooperative Association).
Anderson, D. D. (1981) Regulatory Politics and Electric Utilities: A Case Study in Political Economy (Boston: Auburn House).
Atkinson, E. (1921) ‘Factory mutual fire insurance’, in Zartman, L. (ed.) Yale Lectures in Insurance: Property Insurance, Fire and Marine (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press) 369–91.
Bailyn, B. (1967) The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press).
Bainbridge, J, (1952) The Biography of an Idea: The Story of Mutual Fire and Casualty Insurance (New York: Doubleday).
Bauer, J. (1949) Public Organization of Electric Power (New York, Harper & Brothers).
Berk, G. (1994) Alternative Tracks: The Constitution of American Industrial Order, 1865–1917 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).
Bissell, R. (1921) ‘Organization of companies’, in Zartman, L. (ed.), Yale Lectures in Insurance: Property Insurance, Fire and Marine (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press) 121–39.
Brearley, H. (1916) The History of the National Board of Fire Underwriters (New York: Frederick Stokes).
Brigham, Jay (1998) Empowering the West: Electrical Politics before FDR (Lawrence: University of Kansas Press).
Buck, S. (1913) The Granger Movement: A Study of Agricultural Organization and Its Political, Economic and Social Manifestations, 1870–1880 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Dawson, M. (1921) ‘Scientific ratemaking’, in Zartman, L. (ed.), Yale Lectures in Insurance: Property Insurance, Fire and Marine (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press) 181–200.
Davis, G. (2013) ‘After the corporation’, Politics and Society 41: 283–308.Google Scholar
Donohue, K. (1999) ‘From cooperative commonwealth to cooperative democracy: the American cooperative ideal, 1880–1940’, in Furlough, E. and Strikwerda, C. (eds.), Consumers against Capitalism? Consumer Cooperation in Europe, North America and Japan, 1840–1990 (Oxford, Rowman & Littlefield), 115–134.
Funigiello, P. J. (1973) Toward a National Power Policy: The New Deal and the Electric Utility Industry, 1933–41 (London: University of Pittsburgh Press).
Goodwyn, L. (1976) Democratic Promise: The Populist Movement in America (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Grant, H. R. (1979) Insurance Reform: Consumer Action in the Progressive Era (Aimes: University of Iowa Press).
Hansmann, H. (1996) The Ownership of Enterprise (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Hattam, V. (1990) ‘Economic visions and political strategy: American labor and the state, 1865–1896’, Studies in American Political Development 4: 82–129.Google Scholar
Heflebower, R. (1980) Cooperatives and Mutuals in the Market System (Madison: University of Wisconsin).
Heimer, C. (1985) Reactive Risk and Rational Action: Managing Moral Hazards in Insurance Contracts (Berkeley: University of California Press).
Hughes, T. P. (1983) Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).
Kimball, S. L. (1960) Insurance and Public Policy (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press).
King, C. L. (ed.), (1914) The Regulation of Municipal Utilities, National Municipal League Series (New York: D. Appleton and Company).
Knapp, J. (1969) The Rise of American Cooperative Enterprise (Danville IL: Interstate Publishers and Printers).
Kruse, D., Freeman, B., and Blasi, J. (eds.) (2010) Shared Capitalism at Work (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
MacDonald, F. (1958) ‘Samuel Insull and the movement for state utility regulatory commissions’, Business History Review 32: 241–254.Google Scholar
Marquis, C., and Lounsbury, M. (2007) ‘Vive la résistance: competing logics in the consolidation of community banking’, Academy Management Journal 50: 799–820.Google Scholar
Merritt Committee Report (1911) Report of the Joint Committee of the Senate and Assembly of the State of New York Appointed to Investigate the Corrupt Practices in Connection with Legislation, and the Affairs of Insurance Companies Other Than Those Doing Life Insurance Business New York Assembly Documents, No. 30 (Albany: J.B. Lyon).
McGuire, P. (1989) ‘Instrumental class power and the origin of class-based state regulation in the US electric utility industry’, Critical Sociology 16(2–3): 181–203.Google Scholar
Mowbray, A. (1946) Insurance: Its Theory and Practice in the United States (New York: McGraw Hill).
Nord, D. (1975) ‘The experts versus the experts: conflicting philosophies of municipal utility regulation in the progressive era’, Wisconsin Magazine of History 58: 219–236.Google Scholar
Nordin, D. (1974) Rich Harvest: A History of the Grange, 1867–1900 (Jackson: University of Mississippi).
Nye, D. (1990) Electrifying America: Social Meanings of a New Technology (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Oviatt, F. C. (1921) ‘ History of fire insurance in the United States ’, in Zartman, L. (ed.), Yale Lectures in Insurance: Property Insurance, Fire and Marine (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press) 70–98.
Parker, K. (1965) ‘Ratemaking in fire insurance’, in Long, J. and Gregg, D. (eds.), Property and Insurance Liability Handbook (Homewood IL: Richard D. Irwin), 169–189.
Parsons, F. (1901) The City for the People or the Municipalization of City Government and of Local Franchises (Philadelphia: C.F. Taylor).
Pettit, P. (1997) Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Pettit, P. (2006) ‘Freedom in the market’, Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1: 131–149.Google Scholar
Riegel, R. (1916) Fire Underwriters Associations in the United States (New York: The Chronicle Co.).
Rodgers, D. T. (1998) Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a Progressive Age (Cambridge: Belknap Press).
Rudolph, R., and Ridley, S. (1986) Power Struggle: The Hundred Year War over Electricity (New York: Harper & Row).
Rural Electrification Administration (REA) (1938) Report of the Rural Electrification Administration, 1937 (Washington, DC: REA).
Rural Electrification Administration (REA) (1940) Report of the Rural Electrification Administration, 1939 (Washington, DC: REA).
Rural Electrification Administration (REA) (1951) Report of the Rural Electrification Administration, 1950 (Washington, DC: REA).
Schap, D. (1986) Municipal Ownership in the Electric Utility Industry: A Centennial View (New York: Praeger).
Schneiberg, M. (1999) ‘Political and institutional conditions for governance by association’, Politics and Society: 66–102.
Schneiberg, M. (2002) ‘Organizational heterogeneity and the production of new forms: politics, social movements and mutual companies in American fire insurance, 1900–1930’, Research in the Sociology of Organizations 19: 39–89.Google Scholar
Schneiberg, M. (2011) ‘Toward an organizationally diversified American capitalism? Cooperative, mutual and local state-owned enterprise’, Seattle University Law Review 34: 1490–1534.Google Scholar
Schneiberg, Marc (2013) ‘Organizational diversity and regulatory strategy in financial markets: possibilities for upgrading and reform’, North Carolina Banking Institute Journal 18: 141–165.Google Scholar
Schneiberg, Marc, King, Marissa, and Smith, Thomas (2008) ‘Social movements and organizational form: cooperative alternatives to corporations in the American insurance, dairy and grain industries’, American Sociological Review 73: 635–667.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. D. (1932) Confessions of the Power Trust (New York: E.P. Dutton and Co).
Twentieth Century Fund (1948) Electric Power and Government Policy (Baltimore: Lord Baltimore Press).
Wandel, W. H. (1935) The Control of Competition in Fire Insurance (Lancaster, PA: Art Printing Company).
Wise, R. R. (ed.) (1965) Rural Electric Fact book (Washington DC: National Rural Electric Cooperative Association).
Wood, G. (1969) The Creation Of the American republic (New York: W.W. Norton and Company).
World Council of Credit Unions (WCCU) (2013) Statistical report: credit unions worldwide, www.woccu.org/publications/statreport.
Voss, K. (1993) The Making of American Exceptionalism (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
Zartman, L. (1921) ‘Discrimination and cooperation in fire insurance rating’, in Zartman, L. (ed.), Yale lectures in Insurance: Property Insurance, Fire and Marine (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press) 225–429.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×