Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T06:06:13.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

c - Organization Is Politics Made Durable: Principles and Alternatives

from 10 - Alternatives to the Corporation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2017

Martin Parker
Affiliation:
University of Leicester
George Cheney
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Valerie Fournier
Affiliation:
University of Leicester
Chris Land
Affiliation:
University of Leicester
Grietje Baars
Affiliation:
City University London
Andre Spicer
Affiliation:
City University London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

There are many different ways in which the corporation might be subjected to critical scrutiny, and some of these lines of argument will end with the idea that new forms of economy and organization need to be explored. Not all of them, because other solutions will involve a stress on new forms of state or multilateral regulation which might ameliorate the problems, or on the strengthening of countervailing powers, such as trade unions, activists or consumers (Hadden et al., 2014). Whilst not dismissing such strategies, we would prefer to suggest that a new economy is required, a post-capitalist (and post-corporate) configuration which would play a part in solving many of the problems identified in this book so far. This chapter attempts to put forward an argument concerning how alternatives to the corporation might be evaluated. There are many different ways in which human beings might organize their affairs, but many of them – fascism, slavery, feudalism – are not progressive alternatives. So, if we are suggesting that we should ‘take back the economy’ from corporations (Gibson-Graham, 2013; see also Gibson-Graham, 1996; McNally, 2005; Gibson-Graham, 2006; Parker et al., 2007; 2014a; Davies, this volume), then what might these new organizations look like?

In this chapter we will explore just what sort of principles we might deploy to think about the question of alternatives. This paper is not a worked out normative theory for a post-corporate utopia. Instead, the key idea is that all forms of organizing are ‘political’, which is another way of saying that they are contested. They have upsides and downsides, and it simply isn't possible to say that there are some arrangements which are unambiguously good, and others that are unambiguously bad. Markets can be hugely helpful forms of reward and distribution in some circumstances, and communes can be oppressive and narrow places which crush participation (Freeman, 1972). Hierarchies of authority can be useful too on occasion, particularly for making quick decisions. What we want to bring out in this chapter is an awareness of the consequences of particular forms, and to always understand that there are other ways of doing things.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Corporation
A Critical, Multi-Disciplinary Handbook
, pp. 538 - 545
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arendt, Hannah (1994 [1963]) Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil (London: Penguin).
Bauman, Z. (1989) Modernity and the Holocaust (Cambridge: Polity Press).
Bauman, Z. (2007) Liquid Times (Cambridge: Polity Press).
Berger, P., and Luckmann, T. (1967) The Social Construction of Reality (Harmondsworth: Penguin).
Berlin, I. (1969) Two Concepts of Liberty (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Cheney, G. (2002) Values at Work (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
Clegg, S. (1990) Modern Organizations (London: Sage).
Erdal, D. (2011) Beyond the Corporation: Humanity Working (London: Bodley Head).
Fisher, M. (2007) Capitalist Realism (Winchester: Zero Books).
Freeman, J. (1972) ‘The tyranny of structurelessness’, Berkeley Journal of Sociology 17: 151–165.Google Scholar
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (1996) The End of Capitalism (As We Knew It) (Cambridge: Blackwell).
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2006) A Postcapitalist Politics (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2013) Take Back the Economy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).
Hadden, T., Ireland, P., Morgan, G., Parker, M., Pearson, G., Piccoto, S., Sikka, P., and Willmott, H. (writing as the Corporate Reform Collective) (2014) Fighting Corporate Abuse: Beyond Predatory Capitalism (London: Pluto).
Hsieh, N. (2008) ‘Justice in production’, Journal of Political Philosophy 16(1): 72–100.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R. (2008) Social Identity (London: Routledge).
Latour, B., (1991) ‘Technology is society made durable’ in Law, J. (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters? Essays on Power, Technology and Domination (London: Routledge), 103–31.
Lovink, G., and Scholz, T. (2007) The Art of Free Cooperation (Brooklyn: Autonomedia).
Macintyre, A. (1981) After Virtue (London: Duckworth).
Maeckelbergh, M. (2011) ‘Doing is believing: prefiguration as strategic practice in the alterglobalization movement’, Social Movement Studies 10(1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Marx, K., and Engels, F. (1967 [1848]) The Communist Manifesto (Harmondsworth: Penguin).
McNally, D. (2005) Another World Is Possible (Winnipeg: ArbeiterRing Publishing).
Michels, R. (1915 [1968]) Political Parties (New York: Free Press).
Mill, J. S. (2005 [1859]) On Liberty (New York: Cosimo Classics).
Mulhall, S., and Swift, A. (1992) Liberals and Communitarians (Oxford: Blackwell).
Nozick, R. (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia (New York: Basic Books).
Parker, M. (ed.) (2002) Utopia and Organization (Oxford: Blackwell).
Parker, M., Fournier, V. and Reedy, P. (2007) The Dictionary of Alternatives: Utopia and Organization (London: Zed Books).
Parker, M., Cheney, G., Fournier, V., and Land, C. (eds.) (2014a) The Companion to Alternative Organization (London: Routledge).
Parker, M., Cheney, G., Fournier, V., and Land, C. (2014b) ‘The question of organization: a manifesto for alternatives’, Ephemera 14(4): 623–638.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2006) ‘Freedom in the market’, Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5(2): 131–149.Google Scholar
Schumacher, E. (1993 [1973]) Small Is Beautiful (London: Vintage).
Williams, C. (2005) A Commodified World? Mapping the Limits of Capitalism (London: Zed Books).

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×