Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T02:05:17.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - The reform of the legal profession and the role of the corporate lawyers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2011

Joan Loughrey
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In the wake of the Legal Services Act 2007 (the Act), the legal profession is facing immense change. Particularly significant reforms include the introduction of alternative business structure (ABS), which take two main forms: multidisciplinary partnerships (MDPs) and firms with outside ownership. The Act also introduces the concept of entity regulation: ABSs, as well as the lawyers working within them, must be regulated, and the SRA is extending entity regulation to traditional law firms. The Bar Council is also considering a move to entity regulation. The Act also established the Legal Services Board (LSB), independent from the profession, to oversee ‘approved regulators’ such as the Law Society. However, the Law Society and the Bar Council retain responsibility for drawing up the rules of professional conduct, subject to approval by the LSB. In another significant step, in October 2008 the Law Society commissioned Lord Hunt to review the regulation of solicitors (Hunt Review). A sub-strand of that review was an inquiry into the regulation of corporate law firms (Smedley Review). Both reviews recommended a shift to principles- and outcomes-based regulation for the legal profession, a recommendation that the LSB and the SRA have taken up. To take account of this, and to ensure consistent regulation of ABSs and traditional law firms, the SRA is redrafting its Code of Conduct.

It remains to be seen what impact these reforms will have on the role and values of corporate lawyers, and any discussion is necessarily speculative.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bazley, S., ‘The Financial Services Authority, risk-based regulation, principles-based rules and accountability’, (2008) Journal of Banking Law and Regulation 422Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×