Abd Elmonem, M. A., Nasr, E. S., and Geith, M. H., ‘Benefits and Challenges of Cloud ERP Systems – A Systematic Literature Review’ (2016) 1 Future Computing and Informatics Journal 1–9Google Scholar

Adams, R. and Ferreira, D., ‘One Share-One Vote: The Empirical Evidence’ (2008) 12 Review of Finance 51–91Google Scholar

Akerlof, G. A., ‘The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism’ (1970) 84 The Quarterly Journal of Economics 488–500Google Scholar

Aktiengesetz (1965) vom 6 seotember 1965, Sammlung des Bundesrechts, Bundesgesetabl III 4121-1Google Scholar

Al‐Mashari, M., ‘Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems: A Research Agenda’ (2003) 103 Industrial Management & Data Systems 22–27Google Scholar

Andersen, T. J. and Andersson, U., ‘Multinational Corporate Strategy-Making: Integrating International Business and Strategic Management’ in Andersen, T. J. (ed.), The Responsive Global Organization (Emerald, 2017), pp. 13–34Google Scholar

Anker-Sørensen, L., ‘Parental Liability for Externalities of Subsidiaries: Domestic and Extraterritorial Approaches’ (2014) 3 Dovenschmidt Quarterly 102–18Google Scholar

Anker-Sørensen, L., ‘Financial Engineering as an Alternative Veil for the Corporate Group’ (2016) 13 European Company Law 158–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anker-Sørensen, L. and Clarke, B., ‘The EU as Norm Creator for Sustainable Groups’ in Sjåfjell, B. and Bruner, C. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook for Sustainable Companies (Cambridge University Press, 2019), pp. 190–203Google Scholar

Antunes, J. E., Liability of Corporate Groups: Autonomy and Control in Parent-Subsidiary Relationships in U.S., German and EEC Law: An International and Comparative Perspective (Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, 1994)Google Scholar

Antunes, J. E., ‘The Law of Corporate Groups in Portugal’ (2008) Institute for Law and Finance, Working Paper Series No. 84, 05/2008Google Scholar

Armour, J. and Ringe, W.-G., ‘European Company Law 1999–2010: Renaissance and Crisis’ (2011) ECGI Working Paper Series in Law, No. 175/2011Google Scholar

Arnold, R. D. and Wade, J. P., ‘A Definition of Systems Thinking: A Systems Approach’ (2015) 44 Procedia Computer Science 669–78Google Scholar

Au, S., Tokenomics: The Crypto Shift of Blockchains, ICOs, and Tokens (Packt, 2018)Google Scholar

Autenne, A., Biondi, Y., Cavalier, G., et al., ‘The Current Challenges for EU Company and Financial Law and Regulation’ (2018) 8 Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium 1–12Google Scholar

Autokran, 95 Entscheidungen des Bundesgerichtshofes in Zivilsachen (BGHZ) 330 (F.R.G.) (1985)Google Scholar

Avgouleas, E., ‘Reforming Investor Protection Regulation: The Impact of Cognitive Biases’ in Faure, M. and Stephen, F. (eds.) Essays in the Law and Economics of Regulation in Honour of Anthony Ogus (Intersentia, 2008), pp. 143–66Google Scholar

Avgouleas, E., ‘The Global Financial Crisis, Behavioural Finance and Financial Regulation: In Search of a New Orthodoxy’ (2009) 9 Journal of Corporate Law Studies 23–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Avgouleas, E. and Cullen, J., ‘Excessive Leverage and Bankers’ Pay: Governance and Financial Stability Costs of a Symbiotic Relationship’ (2014) 21 Columbia Journal of European Law 1–46Google Scholar

Avgouleas, E. and Cullen, J., ‘Market Discipline and EU Corporate Governance Reform in the Banking Sector: Merits, Fallacies, and Cognitive Boundaries’ (2014) 41 Journal of Law and Society 28–50Google Scholar

Avi-Yonah, R. S., ‘National Regulation of Multinational Enterprises: An Essay on Comity, Extraterritoriality, and Harmonization’ (2003) 42 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 5–34Google Scholar

Avi-Yonah, R. S. and Sivan, D., ‘A Historical Perspective on Corporate Form and Real Entity: Implications for Corporate Social Responsibility’ in Biondi, Y., Canziani, A., and Kirat, T. (eds.), The Firm as an Entity: Implications for Economics, Accounting and the Law (Routledge, 2007), pp. 153–85.Google Scholar

Awrey, D., ‘Complexity, Innovation and the Regulation of Modern Financial Markets’ (2012) 2 Harvard Business Law Review 235–94Google Scholar

Ayres, I. and Gertner, R., ‘Filling Gaps in Incomplete Contracts: An Economic Theory of Default Rules’ (1989) 99 The Yale Law Journal 87–130Google Scholar

Baglioni, E., Campling, L., and Havice, E., ‘The Nature of the Firm in Global Value Chains’ in Baars, G. and Spicer, A. (eds.), The Corporation (Cambridge University Press, 2017), pp. 314–25Google Scholar

Baker, G., Gibbons, R., and Murphy, K. J., ‘Relational Contracts and the Theory of the Firm’ (2002) 117 The Quarterly Journal of Economics 39–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ballantine, H. W., Ballantine on Corporations: Founded on Clark and Marshall Corporations (Callaghan, 1927)Google Scholar

Baratta, R. and Carli, L. G., ‘Complexity of EU Law in the Domestic Implementation Process’ (Brussels, 2014), europa.eu (accessed October 16, 2021)Google Scholar

Bartlett, C. A. and Ghoshal, S., Managing across Borders: The Transnational Solution (Harvard Business School Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Bartlett, R. P. III, ‘Inefficiencies in the Information Thicket: A Case Study of Derivative Disclosures during the Financial Crisis’ (2010) 36 Journal of Corporation Law 1–58Google Scholar

Bartman, S. M., ‘From Autonomy of Interests to Concurrence of Interests in Dutch Group Company Law’ (2007) 4 European Company Law 207–10Google Scholar

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Report on Special Purpose Entities (2009), www.bis.org/publ/joint23.pdf (accessed January 20, 2019)Google Scholar

Battiston, S., Caldarelli, G., Georg, C.-P., May, R., and Stiglitz, J., ‘Complex Derivatives’ (2013) 9 Nature Physics 123–25Google Scholar

Bebchuk, L. A. and Jackson, J., ‘The Law and Economics of Blockholder Disclosure’ (2011) Harvard Law School John M. Olin Center Discussion Paper No. 702Google Scholar

Bebchuk, L. A., Kraakman, R., and Triantis, G., ‘Stock Pyramids, Cross-Ownership, and the Dual Class Equity: The Creation and Agency Costs of Separating Control from Cash Flow Rights’ in Morck, R. (ed.), Concentrated Corporate Ownership (University of Chicago Press, 2000), pp. 295–315Google Scholar

Belinfanti, T., ‘The Proxy Advisory & Corporate Governance Industry: The Case for Increased Oversight and Control’ (2009) New York Law School Legal Studies, Research Paper Series 09/10 #21Google Scholar

Berglöf, E., ‘A Note on the Typology of Financial Systems’ in Hopt, K. J. and Wymeersch, E. (eds.), Comparative Corporate Governance: Essays and Materials (Walter de Gruyter, 1997), pp. 151–64Google Scholar

Berle, A. A., ‘The Theory of Enterprise Entity’ (1947) 47 Columbia Law Review 343–58Google Scholar

Berle, A. A., ‘The Theory of Enterprise Entity’ in Biondi, Y., Canziani, A., and Kirat, T. (eds.), The Firm as an Entity: Implications for Economics, Accounting and the Law (Routledge, 2007), pp. 186–200Google Scholar

Beuselinck, C., Deloof, M., and Manigart, S., ‘Financial Reporting, Disclosure, and Corporate Governance’ in Wright, M., Siegel, D. S., Keasey, K., and Filatotchev, I. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Governance (Oxford University Press, 2013), pp. 290–308Google Scholar

Biondi, Y., ‘Accounting and the Economic Nature of the Firm as an Entity’ in Biondi, Y., Canziani, A., Kirat, T. (eds.), The Firm as an Entity: Implications for Economics, Accounting and the Law (Routledge, 2007), pp. 237–65Google Scholar

Biondi, Y., Canziani, A., and Kirat, T. (eds.), The Firm as an Entity: Implications for Economics, Accounting and the Law (Routledge, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biondi, Y., Canziani, A., and Kirat, T., ‘Coming Back to the Enterprise Entity’ in Biondi, Y., Canziani, A., Kirat, T. (eds.), The Firm as an Entity: Implications for Economics, Accounting and the Law (Routledge, 2007), pp. 3–8Google Scholar

Birkinshaw, J. M. and Morrison, A. J., ‘Configurations of Strategy and Structure in Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations’ (1995) 26 Journal of International Business Studies 729–53Google Scholar

Birkinshaw, J. and Pedersen, T., ‘Strategy and Management in MNE Subsidiaries’ in Rugman, A. M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of International Business (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Birkmose, H. S. and Engsig Sørensen, K. (eds.), ‘Duties to Disclose’ Shareholders’ Duties (Wolters Kluwer, 2017)Google Scholar

Birkmose, H. S. and Möslein, F., ‘Introduction: Mapping Shareholders’ Duties’ in Birkmose, H. S. (ed.), Shareholders’ Duties (Wolters Kluwer, 2017), pp. 1–25Google Scholar

Blau, P. M., Formal Organizations: A Comparative Approach (Chandler PubCo, 1962)Google Scholar

Blumberg, P. I., The Law of Corporate Groups: Procedural Problems in the Law of Parent and Subsidiary Corporations (Little, Brown, 1983)Google Scholar

Blumberg, P. I., The Law of Corporate Groups: Tort, Contract, and Other Common Law Problems in the Substantive Law of Parent and Subsidiary Corporations (Little, Brown and Company, 1988)Google Scholar

Blumberg, P. I., ‘The American Law of Corporate Groups’ in McCahery, J., Picciotto, S., Scott, C. (eds.), Corporate Control and Accountability: Changing Structures and the Dynamics of Regulation (Clarendon Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Blumberg, P. I., The Multinational Challenge to Corporation Law: The Search for a New Corporate Personality (Oxford University Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Blumberg, P. I., ‘National Law and Transnational Groups and Transactions: Survey of the American Experience’ (1995) 5 Australian Journal of Corporate Law 295–300Google Scholar

Blumberg, P. I., ‘Accountability of Multinational Corporations: The Barriers Presented by Concepts of the Corporate Juridical Entity Symposium: Holding Multinational Corporations Responsible under International Law’ (2001) 24 Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 297–320Google Scholar

Blumberg, P. I., ‘The Transformation of Modern Corporation Law: The Law of Corporate Groups’ (2005) 37 Connecticut Law Review 605–18Google Scholar

Blumberg, P. I. and Strasser, K. A., Enterprise Liability in Commercial Relationships: Including Franchising, Licensing, Health Care Enterprises, Successor Liability, Lender Liability, and Inherent Agency (Aspen Law & Business, 1998)Google Scholar

Blumberg, P. I., Strasser, K. A., Georgakopoulos, N. L., and Gouvin, E. J., Blumberg on Corporate Groups (Aspen Publishers, 2004)Google Scholar

Bonbright, J. C. and Means, G. C., The Holding Company: Its Public Significance and its Regulation (McGraw-Hill, 1932)Google Scholar

Bond, B., Genovese, Y., Miklovic, D., Wood, N., Zrimsek, B., and Rayner, N., ‘ERP Is Dead – Long Live ERP II’ (2000) Gartner Group RAS Services, SPA-12-0420 (2000)Google Scholar

‘Book 2 Dutch Civil Code Legal persons’, Dutch Civil LawGoogle Scholar

Booth v Robinson, 55 Md. 419 (1880)Google Scholar

Bornschier, V., ‘Mulitnational Corporations in World System Perspective’ in Mommsen, W. J., Osterhammel, J., Deutsches historisches Institut London (eds.), Imperialism and After: Continuities and Discontinuities (German Historical Institute, 1986)Google Scholar

Bower, J. L. and Gilbert, C. G., From Resource Allocation to Strategy (Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Boyd, B. K. and Hoskisson, R. E., ‘Corporate Governance of Business Groups’ in Colpan, A. M., Hikino, T., Lincoln, J. R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Business Groups (Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 670–95Google Scholar

Bradley, C., ‘Transparency and Financial Regulation in the European Union: Crisis and Complexity European Union Law Issue: Essay’ (2011) 35 Fordham International Law Journal 1171–1206Google Scholar

Brennan, N., ‘Joint Committee of Inquiry into the Banking Crisis – Witness Statement of Niamh Brennan’ (2015)Google Scholar

British Academy Forum, ‘The Global Financial Crisis – Why Didn’t Anybody Notice?’ (2009) British Academy ReviewGoogle Scholar

Brooks, D., ‘Depository Trust Company and the Omnibus Proxy: Shareholder Voting in the Era of Share Immobilization Comment’ (2014) 56 South Texas Law Review 205–39Google Scholar

Buckley, P. J., ‘Internalisation Thinking: From the Multinational Enterprise to the Global Factory’ (2009) 18 International Business Review 224–35Google Scholar

Burgelman, R. A. and Grove, A. S., ‘Let Chaos Reign, then Rein in Chaos—Repeatedly: Managing Strategic Dynamics for Corporate Longevity’ (2007) 28 Strategic Management Journal 965–79Google Scholar

Burkart, M. and Lee, S., ‘The One Share – One Vote Debate: A Theoretical Perspective’ (2007) ECGI – Finance Working Paper No. 176/2007 1–58Google Scholar

Buxbaum, R. M., ‘Is “Network” a Legal Concept?’ (1993) 149 Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE) / Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 698–705Google Scholar

C-30/87 – Corinne Bodson v SA Pompes funèbres des régions libérées (1988)Google Scholar

C-48/69 – Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd. v Commission of the European Communities (1972)Google Scholar

C-60/90 – Polysar Investments Netherlands v Inspecteur der Invoerrechten en Accijnzen (1991)Google Scholar

C-66/86 – Ahmed Saeed Flugreisen and Others v Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs (1989)Google Scholar

C-68/88 – Commission v Greece (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

C-73/95 P – Viho Europe BV v Commission of the European Communities (1996)Google Scholar

C-81/09 – dryma Typou AE v Ypourgos Typou kai Meson Mazikis Enimerosis (2010)Google Scholar

C-81/87 – The Queen v Treasury and Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte Daily Mail and General Trust PLC (1988)Google Scholar

C-97/08 P – Akzo Nobel and Others v Commission (2009)Google Scholar

C-106/16 – POLBUD – WYKONAWSTWO (2017)Google Scholar

C-170/83 – Hydrotherm (1984)Google Scholar

C-174/04 – Commission v Italy (2005)Google Scholar

C-196/04 – Cadbury Schweppes and Cadbury Schweppes Overseas (2006)Google Scholar

C-208/00 – Überseering BV v Nordic Construction Company Baumanagement GmbH (NCC) (2002)Google Scholar

C-210/06 – Cartesio (2008)Google Scholar

C-251/98 – C. Baars v Inspecteur der Belastingen Particulieren/Ondernemingen Gorinchem (2000)Google Scholar

C-260/95 – Commissioners of Customs and Excise v DFDS (1997)Google Scholar

C-283/81 – CILFIT v Ministero della Sanità (1982)Google Scholar

C-326/07 – Commission v Italy (2009)Google Scholar

C-341/04 – Eurofood IFSC (2006)Google Scholar

C-360/06 – Heinrich Bauer Verlag (2008)Google Scholar

C-378/10 – VALE Építési (2012)Google Scholar

C-425/06 – Part Service (2008)Google Scholar

C-436/00 – X and Y (2002)Google Scholar

C-440/11 P – Commission v Stichting Administratiekantoor Portielje (2013)Google Scholar

C-464/05 – Geurts and Vogten (2007)Google Scholar

C-480/09 P – AceaElectrabel Produzione v Commission (2010)Google Scholar

C-501/11 P – Schindler Holding and Others v Commission (2013)Google Scholar

Cases No 2C 364/2012, 2C 377/2012 – Federal Tax Administration v Danish A/S (2015)Google Scholar

Castells, M., The Rise of the Network Society (Wiley‐Blackwell, 2010)Google Scholar

Caves, Richard E., Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Chandler, A. D., Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise (MIT Press, 1962)Google Scholar

Chandler, A. D., Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise (MIT Press, 1990)Google Scholar

Chandler, A. D. and Mazlish, B., Leviathans: Multinational Corporations and the New Global History (Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Chandler, A. D. and Mazlish, B., ‘Introduction’ in Chandler, A. D., Mazlish, B. (eds.), Leviathans: Multinational Corporations and the New Global History (Cambridge University Press, 2005), pp. 1–15Google Scholar

Chang, M.-K., Cheung, W., Cheng, C.-H., and Yeung, J. H. Y., ‘Understanding ERP System Adoption from the User’s Perspective’ (2008) 113 International Journal of Production Economics 928–42Google Scholar

Chang, R. S., ‘Porsche: A “Hedge Fund With a Carmaker Attached”’ January 2009, https://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/23/porsche-a-hedge-fund-with-a-carmaker-attached/ (accessed September 11, 2018)Google Scholar

Charterbridge Corp. Ltd. v Lloyds Bank Ltd (1970)Google Scholar

Chatzimanoli, D., ‘A Crisis of Governance? – From Lamfalussy to de Larosière or Bridging the Gap between Law and New Governance in the EU Financial Services Sector’ (2011) 2 European Journal of Risk Regulation 322–39Google Scholar

Cheffins, B. R., Corporate Ownership and Control: British Business Transformed (Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Chemla, G., Ljungqvist, A., and Habib, M., ‘An Analysis of Shareholder Agreements’ (2007) 5 Journal of the European Economic Association 93–121Google Scholar

Child, J., ‘Strategies of Control and Organizational Behavior’ (1973) 18 Administrative Science Quarterly 1–17Google Scholar

Choi, S., ‘Market Lessons for Gatekeepers’ (1998) 92 Northwestern University Law Review 916–66Google Scholar

Choi, S., ‘Law, Finance and Path Dependence: Developing Strong Securities Markets’ (2002) 80 Texas Law Review 1657–728Google Scholar

Christidis, K. and Devetsikiotis, M., ‘Blockchains and Smart Contracts for the Internet of Things’ (2016) 4 IEEE Access 2292–303Google Scholar

Chui, M. and Upper, C., ‘Recent Developments in Chinese Shadow Banking’ (2017) SUERF Policy Note. The European Money and Finance ForumGoogle Scholar

Clarke, B. J., ‘Where Was the “Market for Corporate Control” When We Needed It?’ (2009) UCD Working Papers in Law, Criminology & Socio-Legal Studies Research Paper No. 23/2009Google Scholar

Clarke, T., International Corporate Governance: A Comparative Governance (Routledge, 2007)Google Scholar

Clausen, N. J. and Engsig Sørensen, K., ‘Disclosure of Major Shareholdings: A Comparative Analysis of the Regulation in Europe’ (2002) 4 International and Comparative Corporate Law Journal 201–48Google Scholar

Clottens, C., ‘Empty Voting: A European Perspective’ (2012) 9 European Company and Financial Law Review 446–83Google Scholar

Coase, R. H., ‘The Nature of the Firm’ (1937) 4 Economica 386–405Google Scholar

Coffee, J. C., ‘What Caused Enron?: A Capsule Social and Economic History of the 1990’s’ (2003) Columbia Law and Economics Working Paper No. 214Google Scholar

Cohen, J., ‘Negative Voting: Why It Destroys Shareholder Value and a Proposal to Prevent It Note’ (2008) 45 Harvard Journal on Legislation 237–58Google Scholar

Cohen, Stephen D., ‘Multinational Corporations and Foreign Direct Investment: Avoiding Simplicity, Embracing Complexity’ (Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Colpan, A. M. and Guillén, M. F., ‘Capability Building in Business Groups’ in Colpan, A. M., Hikino, T., Lincoln, J. R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Business Groups (Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 743–81Google Scholar

Colpan, A. M. and Hikino, T., ‘Foundations of Business Groups: Towards an Integrated Framework’ in Colpan, A. M., Hikino, T., Lincoln, J. R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Business Groups (Oxford University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colpan, A. M. and Jones, G. G., ‘Business Groups in Historical Perspectives’ in Colpan, A. M., Hikino, T., Lincoln, J. R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Business Groups (Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

‘COM(2009) 114 final: Communication for the spring European Council – Driving European recovery – Volume 1’ (2009)Google Scholar

‘COM/2011/0684 final: Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings’ (2011)Google Scholar

European Union, ‘COM(2016) 198 final: Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of income tax information by certain undertakings and branches’ (2016)Google Scholar

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1437 of 19 May 2016 supplementing Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards on access to regulated information at Union level (2016)Google Scholar

Commission of the European Communities, ‘SEC(2008) 3033 final: Report on more stringent national measures concerning Directive 2004/109/EC on the harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market’ (2008)Google Scholar

Committee of European Securities Regulators, CESR Report on the mapping of supervisory powers, administrative and criminal sanctioning regimes of Member States in relation to the Transparency Directive (TD) CESR/09-058 (2009)Google Scholar

Committee of European Securities Regulators, ‘CESR proposal to extend major shareholding notifications to instruments of similar economic effect to holding shares and entitlements to acquire shares CESR/09-1215 b’ (2010)Google Scholar

Conac, P.-H., ‘Cash-Settled Derivatives as a Takeover Instrument and the Reform of the EU Transparency Directive’ in Birkmose, H. S., Neville, M., Engsig Sørensen, K. (eds.), The European Financial Market in Transition (Kluwer Law International Kluwer Law International BV, 2012), pp. 49–68Google Scholar

Conac, P.-H., ‘Director’s Duties in Groups of Companies – Legalizing the Interest of the Group at the European Level’ (2013) 10 European Company and Financial Law Review 194–226Google Scholar

Connelly, B. L., Hoskisson, R. E., Tihanyi, L., and Certo, S. T., ‘Ownership as a Form of Corporate Governance’ (2010) 47 Journal of Management Studies 1561–89Google Scholar

Craig, P. P. and De Búrca, G., EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Cullen, J., ‘The Repo Market, Collateral and Systemic Risk: In Search of Regulatory Coherence’ in Chiu, I., MacNeil, I. (eds.), Research Handbook on Shadow Banking (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018), pp. 85–116Google Scholar

Cunningham, L. A., The Essays of Warren Buffett: Lessons for Investors and Managers (Wiley, 2014)Google Scholar

Cunningham, L. A. and Zaring, D., ‘The Three or Four Approaches to Financial Regulation: A Cautionary Analysis against Exuberance in Crisis Response’ (2009) 78 George Washington Law Review 39–113Google Scholar

Cusumano, M., ‘Principles for Managing Strategy and Innovation’ January 2012, https://blog.irvingwb.com/blog/2012/01/principles-for-managing-strategy-and-innovation.html (accessed March 9, 2019)Google Scholar

Davenport, T. H., ‘Putting the Enterprise into the Enterprise System’ (1998) 76:4 Harvard Business Review 121–31Google Scholar

D’Avolio, G., ‘The Market for Borrowing Stock’ (2002) 66 Journal of Financial Economics 271–306Google Scholar

Dearborn, M., ‘Enterprise Liability: Reviewing and Revitalizing Liability for Corporate Groups’ (2009) 97 California Law Review 195–262Google Scholar

Deephaven Risk Arb Trading Ltd v UnitedGlobalCom, Inc (2005) Del Ch 2005 WL 1713067 (2005)Google Scholar

Denning, S., ‘Big Banks and Derivatives: Why Another Financial Crisis Is Inevitable’ (2013) ForbesGoogle Scholar

Dietzenbacher, E. and Temurshoev, U., ‘Ownership Relations in the Presence of Cross-Shareholding’ (2008) 95 Journal of Economics 189–212Google Scholar

Dine, J., The Governance of Corporate Groups (Cambridge University Press, 2000)Google Scholar

Dodd, R., ‘Derivatives Markets: Sources of Vulnerability in U.S. Financial Markets’ (2001) Derivatives Study CenterGoogle Scholar

Dodd, R., ‘Global Master Repurchase Agreement’Google Scholar

Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (2010)Google Scholar

van der Does de Willebois, E., Halter, E. M., Harrison, R. A., Park, J. W., and Sharman, J. C., The Puppet Masters: How the Corrupt Use Legal Structures to Hide Stolen Assets and What to Do About It (World Bank, 2011)Google Scholar

Doremus, P. N., The Myth of the Global Corporation (Princeton University Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Double Taxation Conventions and the Use of Conduit Companies (1986)Google Scholar

Douglas, W. O. and Shanks, C. M., ‘Insulation from Liability Through Subsidiary Corporations’ (1929) 39 The Yale Law Journal 193Google Scholar

Dunning, J. H., Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy (Edward Elgar, 2008)Google Scholar

Easterbrook, F. H. and Fischel, D. R., ‘Shareholder Voting Rights and the Exercise of Voice’ in Romano, R. (ed.), Foundations of corporate law (Oxford University Press, 1993), pp. 187–222Google Scholar

Easterbrook, F. H. and Fischel, D. R., The Economic Structure of Corporate Law (Harvard University Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Elhauge, E., ‘Horizontal Shareholding Essay’ (2015) 129 Harvard Law Review 1267–317Google Scholar

Elhauge, E., ‘New Evidence, Proofs, and Legal Theories on Horizontal Shareholding’ (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elragal, A. and Haddara, M., ‘The Future of ERP Systems: Look Backward Before Moving Forward’ (2012) 5 Procedia Technology 21–30Google Scholar

Engsig Sørensen, K., ‘Groups of Companies in the Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union’ (2016) 27 European Business Law Review 393–420Google Scholar

Engsig Sørensen, K., ‘Shareholders’ Duty to Disclose’ in H. S. Birkmose (ed.), Shareholders’ Duties (Kluwer Law International, 2017), pp. 307–30Google Scholar

Engsig Sørensen, K. and Neville, M., ‘Suspension of the Exercise of Voting Rights – A Step towards Deterrent and Consistent Sanctioning of EU Transparency Requirements?’ (2017) Nordic & European Company Law Working Paper No. 16-25Google Scholar

Eroglu, M., ‘Obstacles and Possibilities for Sustainable Companies in Turkey’ (2013) University of Oslo Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2013-04Google Scholar

Etemadi, H. and Kazeminia, S., ‘Impact of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems (ERP) on Management Accountants’ (2014) 3 Management and Administrative Science Review 507–15Google Scholar

EU, Seventh Council Directive 83/349/EEC of 13 June 1983 based on the Article 54 (3) (g) of the Treaty on consolidated accounts (1983)Google Scholar

EU, Council Directive 88/627/EEC of 12 December 1988 on the information to be published when a major holding in a listed company is acquired or disposed of (1988)Google Scholar

EU, Eleventh Council Directive 89/666/EEC of 21 December 1989 concerning disclosure requirements in respect of branches opened in a Member State by certain types of company governed by the law of another State (1989)Google Scholar

EU, Regulation (EC) No 1606/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 July 2002 on the application of international accounting standards (2002)Google Scholar

EU, Directive 2003/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 on the prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading and amending Directive 2001/34/EC (2003)Google Scholar

EU, Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation) (2004)Google Scholar

EU, Directive 2004/35/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage (2004)Google Scholar

EU, Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on markets in financial instruments amending Council Directives 85/611/EEC and 93/6/EEC and Directive 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 93/22/EEC (2004)Google Scholar

EU, Commission Regulation (EC) No 809/2004 of 29 April 2004 implementing Directive 2003/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards information contained in prospectuses as well as the format, incorporation by reference and publication of such prospectuses and dissemination of advertisements (2004)Google Scholar

EU, Directive 2004/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 april 2004 on takeover bids (2004)Google Scholar

EU, Directive 2004/109/EC on the harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market and amending Directive 2001/34/EC (2004)Google Scholar

EU, Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market (2006)Google Scholar

EU, Commission Directive 2007/14/EC of 8 March 2007 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of certain provisions of Directive 2004/109/EC on the harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market (2007)Google Scholar

EU, Directive 2009/101/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on coordination of safeguards which, for the protection of the interests of members and third parties, are required by Member States of companies within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 48 of the Treaty, with a view to making such safeguards equivalent (2009)Google Scholar

EU, Directive 2009/102/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 in the area of company law on single-member private limited liability companies (2009)Google Scholar

EU, Directive 2009/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on the establishment of a European Works Council or a procedure in Community-scale undertakings and Community-scale groups of undertakings for the purposes of informing and consulting employees (2009)Google Scholar

EU, Council Directive 2009/133/EC of 19 October 2009 on the common system of taxation applicable to mergers, divisions, partial divisions, transfers of assets and exchanges of shares concerning companies of different Member States and to the transfer of the registered office of an SE or SCE between Member States (2009)Google Scholar

EU, Commission Regulation (EU) No 1218/2010 of 14 December 2010 on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to certain categories of specialisation agreements (2010)Google Scholar

EU, Directive 2006/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 relating to the taking up and pursuit of the business of credit institutions (2010)Google Scholar

EU, Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/77/EC (2010)Google Scholar

EU, Council Directive 2011/96/EU of 30 November 2011 on the common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States (2011)Google Scholar

EU, Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) (2012)Google Scholar

EU, Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (2012)Google Scholar

EU, Regulation (EU) No 236/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2012 on short selling and certain aspects of credit default swaps (2012)Google Scholar

EU, Directive 2013/50/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 amending Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market, Directive 2003/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading and Commission Directive 2007/14/EC laying down detailed rules for the implementation of certain provisions of Directive 2004/109/EC (2013)Google Scholar

EU, Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings, amending Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC (2013)Google Scholar

EU, Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on market abuse (market abuse regulation) and repealing Directive 2003/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directives 2003/124/EC, 2003/125/EC and 2004/72/EC (2014)Google Scholar

EU, Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups (2014)Google Scholar

EU, Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU (2014)Google Scholar

EU, Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/761 of 17 December 2014 supplementing Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to certain regulatory technical standards on major holdings (2014)Google Scholar

EU, Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directive 2006/70/EC (2015)Google Scholar

EU, Council Directive (EU) 2016/1164 of 12 July 2016 laying down rules against tax avoidance practices that directly affect the functioning of the internal market (2016)Google Scholar

EU, Council Directive (EU) 2016/881 of 25 May 2016 amending Directive 2011/16/EU as regards mandatory automatic exchange of information in the field of taxation (2016)Google Scholar

EU, Directive (EU) 2017/828 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 amending Directive 2007/36/EC as regards the encouragement of long-term shareholder engagement (2017)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘Amended draft proposal for a ninth Directive based on Article 54(3)(g) of the EEC Treaty on links between undertakings, and in particular on groups’ (1983)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘COM(83) 185 final: Proposal for a Fifth Directive on the Structure of Public Limited Companies and the Powers and Obligations of Their Organs’ (1983)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘COM(1999) 232 final – Communication from the Commission – Implementing the framework for financial markets: action plan’ (1999)Google Scholar

European Commission, COM(2008) 394: – “Think Small First” – A “Small Business Act” for Europe (2008)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘COM(2010) 301: Regulating financial services for sustainable growth’ (2010)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘COM(2010) 284: Green Paper – Corporate Governance in Financial Institutions and Remuneration Policies’ (2010)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘COM(2010) 248 final: Green Paper on Corporate Governance in Financial Institutions and Remuneration Policies’ (2010)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘SEC(2010)0611: Commission staff working document: The review of the operation of Directive 2004/109/EC: emerging issues’ (2010)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘COM(2010) 243 final: Report from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – Operation of Directive 2004/109/EC on the harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market’ (2010)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘Public consultation on disclosure of non-financial information by companies’ (2010)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘SEC(2010) 611: The review of the operation of Directive 2004/109/EC: Emerging issues Accompanying document to COM(2010)243’ (2010)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘SEC(2009) 611: The review of the operation of Directive 2004/109/EC’ (2010)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘Consultation document on the modernization of the Directive 2004/109/EC on the harmonization of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market’ (2010)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘Feedback statement in the summary of responses to the consultation by DG internal market and services on the modernization of the Transparency Directive (2004/109/EC)’ (2010)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘COM(2010) 716 final: COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS Reinforcing sanctioning regimes in the financial services sector’ (2010)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘COM(2011) 683 final: Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Directive 2004/109/EC on the harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market and Commission Directive 2007/14/EC’ (2011)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘Commission Staff Working Paper: Impact Assessment SEC (2011) 1279 final’ (2011)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘Feedback Statement of the European Commission on the Summary of Responses to Commission Green Paper on Corporate Governance in Financial Institutions’ (2011)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘COM(2011) 681 final – A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility’ (2011)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘COM (2011) 164: The EU corporate governance framework’ (2011)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘COM(2012) 740 final, Action Plan: European company law and corporate governance – a modern framework for more engaged shareholders and sustainable companies’ (2012)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘COM(2012) 722 final: An Action Plan to strengthen the fight against tax fraud and tax evasion’ (2012)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘COM(2012) 347 final: Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European economic and social committee and the Committee of the regions – Application of Directive 2004/25/EC on takeover bids’ (2012)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘COM(2013)614 final: COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Shadow Banking – Addressing New Sources of Risk in the Financial Sector’ (2013)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘Economic Review of the Financial Regulation agenda’ (2014)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘COM(2014) 910 final: Commission Work Programme 2015’ (2014)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘COM(2014) 212 final: Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the council on single-member private limited liability companies’ (2014)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘COM(2015) 610 final: Commission Work Programme 2016’ (2015)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘COM(2016) 450: Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Directive (EU) 2015/849 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing and amending Directive 2009/101/EC’ (2018)Google Scholar

European Commission, ‘COM(2003) 284 final: Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament – Modernising Company Law and Enhancing Corporate Governance in the European Union – A Plan to Move Forward’Google Scholar

European Parliament, ‘Enhancing the coherence of EU Financial service legislation’ (2014)Google Scholar

European Securities and Markets Authority, ESMA/2011/288 – Call for evidence on Empty voting (2011)Google Scholar

European Securities and Markets Authority, ESMA/2011/194 – Mapping the Transparency Directive – Options, Directions and ‘Gold plating’ (2011)Google Scholar

European Securities and Markets Authority, ESMA/2012/415 – Feedback Statement Call for Evidence on Empty Voting (2012)Google Scholar

European Securities and Markets Authority, ESMA/2014/300 – Consultation Paper On Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on major shareholdings and indicative list of financial instruments subject to notification requirements under the revised Transparency Directive (2014)Google Scholar

European Securities and Markets Authority, Final report 2014/1187 On draft Regulatory Technical Standards on major shareholdings and an indicative list of financial instruments subject to notification requirements under the revised Transparency Directive (2014)Google Scholar

EY, ‘Challenges in adopting and applying IFRS 10’ (2013)Google Scholar

Fashion Originators’ Guild v F. T. C., 312 U.S. 457 (1941)Google Scholar

Fenwick, M., McCahery, J. A., and Vermeulen, E. P. M., ‘The End of “Corporate” Governance: Hello “Platform” Governance’ (2018) Lex Research Topics in Corporate Law & Economics Working Paper No. 2018-5, European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) – Law Working Paper No. 430/2018Google Scholar

Fenwick, M. and Vermeulen, E. P. M., ‘Technology and Corporate Governance: Blockchain, Crypto, and Artificial Intelligence’ (2018) Lex Research Topics in Corporate Law & Economics Working Paper No. 2018-7Google Scholar

Fenwick, M. and Vermeulen, E. P. M., ‘A Sustainable Platform Economy & the Future of Corporate Governance’ (2019) Lex Research Topics in Corporate Law & Economics Working Paper No. 2019-1Google Scholar

Ferran, E., ‘Crisis-Driven EU Financial Regulatory Reform: Where in the World is the EU Going?’ in Ferran, E., Moloney, N., Hill, J. G., Coffee, J. (eds.), The Regulatory Aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis (Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 1–110Google Scholar

file no. I R 88/13 (2015)Google Scholar

Financial Action Task Force, ‘RBA Guidance for Legal Professionals (Lawyer Guidance)’ (2008)Google Scholar

Financial Action Task Force, FATF Report – Money Laundering Using Trust and Company Service Providers (2010)Google Scholar

Financial Action Task Force (FATF), The Misuse of Corporate Vehicles, Including Trust and Company Service Providers (2006)Google Scholar

Fisch, J. E., ‘Securities Intermediaries and the Separation of Ownership from Control Symposium: In Berle’s Footsteps – A Symposium Celebrating the Launch of the Adolf A. Berle, Jr. Center on Corporations, Law & Society’ (2009) 33 Seattle University Law Review 877–88Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, A. and Teubner, G., ‘Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law Diversity or Cacophony: New Sources of Norms in International Law Symposium’ (2003) 25 Michigan Journal of International Law 999–1046Google Scholar

Fleckner, A. M. and Hopt, K. J., Comparative Corporate Governance: A Functional and International Analysis (Cambridge University press, 2013)Google Scholar

Fleischer, H. and Schmolke, K. U., ‘The Reform of the Transparency Directive: Minimum or Full Harmonisation of Ownership Disclosure?’ (2011) 12 European Business Organization Law Review 121–45Google Scholar

Ford, C. and Liao, C., ‘Power without Property, Still’ (2009) 33 Seattle University Law Review 889–930Google Scholar

Forum Europaeum on Company Groups, Conac, P.-H., Druey, J. N., Forstmoser, P., Habersack, M., Hansen, S. F., Hommelhoff, P., Kalss, S., Krieger, G., Lennarts, M.-L., Lutter, M., Teichmann, C., Werder, A. V., and Wymeersch, E., ‘Proposal to Facilitate the Management of Cross-Border Company Groups in Europe’ (2015) 12 European Company and Financial Law Review, ECFR 299–306Google Scholar

Francis, J. R., Khurana, I. K., Martin, X., and Pereira, R., ‘The Role of Firm-Specific Incentives and Country Factors in Explaining Voluntary IAS Adoptions: Evidence from Private Firms’ (2008) 17 European Accounting Review 331–60Google Scholar

Frankel, T., ‘The New Financial Assets: Separating Ownership from Control Symposium: In Berle’s Footsteps – A Symposium Celebrating the Launch of the Adolf A. Berle, Jr. Center on Corporations, Law & Society’ (2010) 33 Seattle University Law Review 931–64Google Scholar

Fratocchi, L. and Holm, U., ‘Centres of Excellence in the International Firm’ in Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N. (eds.), Multinational Corporate Evolution and Subsidiary Development (Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1998), pp. 189–209Google Scholar

Friedlander, R., ‘Transparency: Five Years after the Dodd-Frank Act’ July 2015, www.treasury.gov/connect/blog/Pages/Transparency-Five-Years-after-the-Dodd-Frank-Act.aspx (accessed February 9, 2019)Google Scholar

G20, Policy Statement – Strengthening tax systems (2014)Google Scholar

Gartner, ‘Top Trends in the Gartner Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies, 2017’ www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/top-trends-in-the-gartner-hype-cycle-for-emerging-technologies-2017/ (accessed February 25, 2019)Google Scholar

General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) (1947)Google Scholar

Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., and Sturgeon, T., ‘The Governance of Global Value Chains’ (2005) 12 Review of International Political Economy 78–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerner-Beuerle, C., Paech, P., and Schuster, E., Study on Directors’ Duties and Liability: Prepared for the European Commission DG Markt (2013)Google Scholar

Gibbon, P., Bair, J., and Ponte, S., ‘Governing Global Value Chains: An Introduction’ (2008) 37 Economy and Society 315–38Google Scholar

Gill, R., ‘The Rise of Two-Tier ERP’ (2011) 93 Strategic Finance; Montvale 35–40Google Scholar

Gilpin, R., Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order (Princeton University Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Gilson, R. J. and Kraakman, R. H., ‘The Mechanisms of Market Efficiency’ (1984) 70 Virginia Law Review 549–644Google Scholar

Gindis, D., ‘Some Building Blocks for a Theory of the Firm as a Real Entity’ in Biondi, Y., Canziani, A., Kirat, T. (eds.), The Firm as an Entity: Implications for Economics, Accounting and the Law (Routledge, 2007), pp. 226–91Google Scholar

Gindis, D. and Baudry, B., ‘The V-Network Form: Economic Organization and the Theory of the Firm’, Working Paper (Oct 10, 2005) (available at SSRN)Google Scholar

Glattfelder, J. B., Decoding Complexity: Uncovering Patterns in Economic Networks (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012)Google Scholar

Glattfelder, J. B., Decoding Complexity: Uncovering Patterns in Economic Networks (Springer, 2013)Google Scholar

Gordon, J. N., ‘What Enron Means for the Management and Control of the Modern Business Corporation: Some Initial Reflections’ (2002) 69 The University of Chicago Law Review 1233–50Google Scholar

Gorton, G. B. and Souleles, N., ‘Special Purpose Vehicles and Securitization’ in Stulz, R. M., Carey, Mark S. (eds.), The Risks of Financial Institutions (University of Chicago Press, 2006), pp. 549–602Google Scholar

Grabski, S. V., Management Accounting in Enterprise Resource Planning Systems (CIMA Publishing, 2009)Google Scholar

Granovetter, M., ‘Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness’ (1985) 91 American Journal of Sociology 481–510Google Scholar

Granovetter, M., ‘Coase Revisited: Business Groups in the Modern Economy’ (1995) 4 Industrial and Corporate Change 93–130Google Scholar

Griggs, L. and Lugten, G., ‘Veil Over the Nets (Unravelling Corporate Liability for IUU Fishing Offences)’ (2007) 31 Marine Policy 159–68Google Scholar

Grundmann, S. and Glasow, F., European Company Law: Organization, Finance and Capital Markets (Intersentia, 2011)Google Scholar

Gullifer, L., ‘Ownership of Securities. The Problem Caused by Intermediation’ in Gullifer, L., Payne, J. (eds.), Intermediated Securities: Legal Problems and Practical Issues (Hart, 2010), pp. 1–31Google Scholar

Hadden, T., The Control of Corporate Groups (University of London, 1983)Google Scholar

Hadden, T., ‘Inside Corporate Groups’ (1984) 12 International Journal of the Sociology of LawGoogle Scholar

Hadden, T., ‘Regulating Corporate Groups: An International Perspective’ in McCahery, J., Picciotto, S., Scott, C. (eds.), Corporate Control and Accountability: Changing Structures and the Dynamics of Regulation (Clarendon Press, 1993), pp. 343–58Google Scholar

Hakala, S., ‘Simple Analysis Is Never a Solution in Valuing Complex Derivative Securities’ www.valuescopeinc.com/resources/white-papers/valuing-complex-derivative-securities/ (accessed March 5, 2019)Google Scholar

Hansmann, H. and Kraakman, R., ‘The End of History for Corporate Law Essay’ (2000) 89 Georgetown Law Journal 439–68Google Scholar

Harper Ho, V., ‘Theories of Corporate Groups: Corporate Identity Reconceived’ (2012) 42 Seton Hall Law Review 879–952Google Scholar

Hedlund, G., ‘The Hypermodern MNC a Heterarchy?’ (1986) 25 Human Resource Management (1986–1998); New York 9–35Google Scholar

Held, D., McGrew, A. G., Goldblatt, D., and Perraton, J. (eds.), Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture (Stanford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

High Level Group of Company Law Experts, ‘A Modern Regulatory Framework for Company Law in Europe: A Consultative Document’ (2002)Google Scholar

High Level Group of Company Law Experts, ‘Report on a Modern Regulatory Framework for Company Law in Europe’ (2002)Google Scholar

Holt, D. H., International Management: Text and Cases (Dryden Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Honoré, A. M., ‘Ownership’ in Guest, A. G. (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (Oxford University Press, 1961), pp. 107–147Google Scholar

Hopt, K. J., ‘A Comparative Study of the Economics, Law, and Regulation of Corporate Groups’ in Gordon, J. N., Ringe, W.-G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Law and Governance (Oxford University Press, 2018)Google Scholar

Hopt, K. J., ‘Groups of Companies – A Comparative Study on the Economics, Law and Regulation of Corporate Groups’ in Gordon, J. N., Ringe, W.-G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Law and Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 603–33Google Scholar

Horn, L., ‘The Financialization of the Corporation’ in Baars, G., Spicer, A. (eds.), The Corporation (Cambridge University Press, 2017), pp. 281–90Google Scholar

Horwitz, M. J., ‘Santa Clara Revisited: The Development of Corporate Theory’ (1985) 88 West Virginia Law Review 173–224Google Scholar

Hu, H. T. C., ‘New Financial Products, the Modern Process of Financial Innovation, and the Puzzle of Shareholder Welfare Symposium: New Financial Products, the Modern Process of Financial Innovation, and the Law’ (1990) 69 Texas Law Review 1273–318Google Scholar

Hu, H. T. C., ‘Misunderstood Derivatives: The Causes of Informational Failure and the Promise of Regulatory Incrementalism Review Essay’ (1992) 102 Yale Law Journal 1457–514Google Scholar

Hu, H. T. C., ‘Behind the Corporate Hedge: Information and the Limits of “Shareholder Wealth Maximization”’ (1996) 9 Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 39–52Google Scholar

Hu, H. T. C., ‘Too Complex to Depict? Innovation, “Pure Information,” and the SEC Disclosure Paradigm’ (2012) 90 Texas Law Review 1601–715Google Scholar

Hu, H. T. C. and Black, B., ‘Empty Voting and Hidden (Morphable) Ownership: Taxonomy, Implications, and Reforms’ (2006) 61 The Business Lawyer 1011–70Google Scholar

Hu, H. and Black, B., ‘The New Vote Buying: Empty Voting and Hidden (morphable) Ownership’ (2006) 79 Southern California Law Review 811–908Google Scholar

Hu, H. T. C. and Black, B., ‘Equity and Debt Decoupling and Empty Voting II: Importance and Extensions’ (2007) 156 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 625–740Google Scholar

Hu, H. T. C. and Black, B., ‘Hedge Funds, Insiders, and the Decoupling of Economic and Voting Ownership: Empty Voting and Hidden (Morphable) Ownership’ (2007) 13 Journal of Corporate Finance 343–67Google Scholar

Hu, H. T. C. and Black, B. S., ‘Debt and Hybrid Decoupling: An Overview’ (2008) 1 M&A Lawyer 4–10Google Scholar

Hu, H. T. C. and Black, B., ‘Debt, Equity and Hybrid Decoupling: Governance and Systemic Risk Implications’ (2008) 14 European Financial Management 663–709Google Scholar

Humphrey, J. and Schmitz, H., ‘Inter-Firm Relationships in Global Value Chains: Trends in Chain Governance and Their Policy Implications’ (2008) 1 International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development 258–82Google Scholar

Hurt, R. L., ‘Application of Management Concepts to ERP Implementation’ (2011) 10 Journal of Business Administration OnlineGoogle Scholar

Hymer, S., ‘The Efficiency (Contradictions) of Multinational Corporations’ (1970) 60 The American Economic Review 441–48Google Scholar

Hymer, S., ‘The Multinational Corporation and the International Division of Labour’ in Cohen, R. B., Felton, N., Nkosi, M., van Liere, J. (eds.), The Multinational Corporation: A Radical Approach (Cambridge University Press, 1979), pp. 140–64Google Scholar

Iacobucci, E. M. and Triantis, G. G., ‘Economic and Legal Boundaries of Firms’ (2007) 93 Virginia Law Review 515–70Google Scholar

ICLEG, ‘Report on Information on Groups’ (2016)Google Scholar

International Accounting Standards, IAS 27 – Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements (2008)Google Scholar

International Accounting Standards, IAS 28 – Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures (2011)Google Scholar

International Accounting Standards Board, SIC-12 – Consolidation – Special Purpose Entities (1998)Google Scholar

International Accounting Standards Board, IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities (2011)Google Scholar

International Accounting Standards Board, IFRS 11 – Joint Arrangements (2011)Google Scholar

International Accounting Standards Board, IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements (2013)Google Scholar

International Corporate Governance Network (ICGN), ‘Guidance on Securities Lending 2007’ Corporate Governance Network (ICGN), Guidance on Securities Lending (2015)Google Scholar

International Corporate Governance Network (ICGN), ‘Global Governance Principles (2014)’Google Scholar

International Securities Lending Association, ‘Global Master Securities Lending Agreement’ (2010)Google Scholar

Ireland, P., ‘Company Law and the Myth of Shareholder Ownership’ (1999) 62 The Modern Law Review 32–57Google Scholar

Jain, S. and Prebble, J., ‘The Swiss Swap Case Revisited’Google Scholar

Jayachandran, P., ‘The Difference between Public and Private Blockchain’ May 2017, www.ibm.com/blogs/blockchain/2017/05/the-difference-between-public-and-private-blockchain/ (accessed March 11, 2019)Google Scholar

Jensen, Michael C., ‘A Theory of the Firm: Governance, Residual Claims, and Organizational Forms’ (Harvard University Press, 2000)Google Scholar

Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H., ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure’ (1976) 3 Journal of Financial Economics (JFE), 305–60Google Scholar

Johnson, L. P. Q. and Millon, D., ‘Recalling Why Corporate Officers Are Fiduciaries’ (2004) 46 William and Mary Law Review 1597–654Google Scholar

Johnson, N. F., Simply Complexity: A Clear Guide to Complexity Theory (Oneworld, 2009)Google Scholar

Johnson, S., Emergence: The Connected Lives of Ants, Brains, Cities and Software (Penguin Allen Lane, 2001)Google Scholar

Joined cases C-282/04 and C-283/04 – Commission v Netherlands (2006)Google Scholar

Jones, G., Multinationals and Global Capitalism: From the Nineteenth to the Twenty First Century (Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Jones, G., ‘Nationality and Multinationals in Historical Perspective’ (2006) HBS Working Paper 06-052Google Scholar

Jul Clausen, N. and Engsig Sørensen, K., ‘Disclosure of Major Shareholdings: A Comparative Analysis of the Regulation in Europe’ (2002) 4 International and Comparative Corporate Law Journal 201–48Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., ‘Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’ in Tversky, A., Slovic, P. (eds.), Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, 1982)Google Scholar

Kalay, A. and Pant, S., ‘Time Varying Voting Rights and the Private Benefits of Control’ (2009) EFA 2008 Athens Meetings Paper 1–57Google Scholar

Kiel, G. C., Hendry, K., and Nicholson, G. J., ‘Corporate Governance Options for the Local Subsidiaries of Multinational Enterprises’ (2006) 14 Corporate Governance: An International Review 568–76Google Scholar

Kim, B., Prescott, J. E., and Kim, S. M., ‘Differentiated Governance of Foreign Subsidiaries in Transnational Corporations: An Agency Theory Perspective’ (2005) 11 Journal of International Management 43–66Google Scholar

Kraakman, R., The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach (Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Kraakman, R. H., ‘Corporate Liability Strategies and the Costs of Legal Controls’ (1984) 93 The Yale Law Journal 857–98Google Scholar

Kraakman, R. H., ‘Gatekeepers: The Anatomy of a Third-Party Enforcement Strategy’ (1986) 2 The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 53–104Google Scholar

Kriger, M. P., ‘The Increasing Role of Subsidiary Boards in MNCs: An Empirical Study’ (1988) 9 Strategic Management Journal 347–60Google Scholar

Krippner, Greta R. Capitalizing on Crisis: The Political Origins of the Rise of Finance (Harvard University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Kurcz, B., ‘Harmonisation by Means of Directives – Never-Ending Story’ (2001) 12 European Business Law Review 287–307Google Scholar

Lambooy, T. and Stamenkova van Rumpt, J., ‘Can Corporate Law on Groups Assist Groups to Effectively Address Climate Change?’ (2014) 3 The Dovenschmidt Quarterly 76–101Google Scholar

Larosière Group, Report of the High-Level Group on Financial Supervision in the EU (2009)Google Scholar

Lee, M., ‘Empty Voting: Private Solutions to a Private Problem Note’ (2007) Columbia Business Law Review 883–912Google Scholar

Liefmann, R., International Cartels, Combines and Trusts (Europa Publishing, 1927)Google Scholar

Lippe, P., Katz, D. M., and Jackson, D., ‘Legal by Design: A New Paradigm for Handling Complexity in Banking Regulation and Elsewhere in Law’ (2014) 93 Oregon Law Review 833–52Google Scholar

Lohse, E. J., ‘The Meaning of Harmonisation in the Context of European Union Law – A Process in Need of Definition’ Theory and Practice of Harmonisation (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2012)Google Scholar

Lonrho Co. Ltd v Shell Petroleum Ltd. & British Petroleum Ltd. (1980) 2 W.L.R. 367,Google Scholar

Luhmann, N., Law as a Social System (Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Luo, Y., ‘Corporate Governance and Accountability in Multinational Enterprises: Concepts and Agenda’ (2005) 11 Journal of International Management 1–18Google Scholar

Lysandrou, P. and Nesvetailova, A., ‘The Role of Shadow Banking Entities in the Financial Crisis: A Disaggregated View’ (2015) 22 Review of International Political Economy 257–79Google Scholar

Madanhire, I. and Mbohwa, C., ‘Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) in Improving Operational Efficiency: Case Study’ (2016) 40 Procedia CIRP 225–29Google Scholar

Mainzer, K., ‘Challenges of Complexity in the 21st Century: An Interdisciplinary Introduction’ (2009) 17 European Review 219–36Google Scholar

Manfrin, F., ‘The Firm as an Entity and the Law: The Economic Substance, the Legal Forms’ in Canziani, A., Kirat, T., Biondi, Y. (eds.), The Firm as an Entity: Implications for Economics, Accounting and the Law (Routledge, 2007), pp. 292–316Google Scholar

Manyika, J., Lund, S., Bughin, J., Woetzel, J., Stamenov, K., and Dhingra, D., Digital Globalization: The New Era of Global Flows (2016)Google Scholar

Marjosola, H., ‘Regulating Financial Markets under Uncertainty: The EU Approach’ (2014) 39 European Law Review 338–61Google Scholar

Market Street Railway Co. v Hellman, 109 Cal. 589 (1895)Google Scholar

Marriage, A., Secret Structures, Hidden Crimes: Urgent Steps to Address Hidden Ownership, Money Laundering and Tax Evasion from Developing Countries (2013)Google Scholar

Masulis, R. W., Pham, P. K., and Zein, J., ‘Family Business Groups Around the World: Financing Advantages, Control Motivations and Organizational Choices’ (2011) ECGI – Finance Working Paper No. 240/2009Google Scholar

Mattli, W. and Woods, N., ‘In Whose Benefit? Explaining Regulatory Change in Global Politics’ The Politics of Global Regulation (Princeton University Press, 2009), pp. 1–43Google Scholar

Mazars and Marccus Partners, Transparency Directive Assessment Report (Mazars report) (2009)Google Scholar

McCulley, P., ‘Teton Reflections’ (2007) Global Central Bank Focus Series, PIMCO, GCB Focus Sept 07 SGP-HK.pdf (pimco-global.com) (accessed October 16, 2021)Google Scholar

Mcfarlane, B. and Stevens, R., ‘Interests in Securities: Practical Problems and Conceptual Solutions’ in Gullifer, L., Payne, J. (eds.), Intermediated Securities. Legal Problems and Practical Issues (Hart Publishing, 2009)Google Scholar

Means, G. and Berle, A., The Modern Corporation and Private Property (Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc, 1932)Google Scholar

Milhaupt, Curtis J. and Pistor, Katharina, Law and Capitalism: What Corporate Crises Reveal about Legal Systems and Economic Development around the World (University of Chicago Press, 2008), pp. 47–67Google Scholar

Miller, G. P. and Rosenfeld, G., ‘Intellectual Hazard: How Conceptual Biases in Complex Organizations Contributed to the Crisis of 2008’ (2010) 33 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy; Cambridge 807–40Google Scholar

Millon, D., ‘Theories of the Corporation’ (1990) 39 Duke Law Journal 201–62Google Scholar

Mock, W., ‘On the Centrality of Information Law: A Rational Choice Discussion of Information Law and Transparency’ (1999) 17 The John Marshall Journal of Computer & Information Law 1069–100Google Scholar

Moloney, N., ‘The Legacy Effects of the Financial Crisis on Regulatory Design in the EU’ in Ferran, E., Hill, J., Moloney, N., Coffee, J. C. (eds.), The Regulatory Aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis (Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 111–202Google Scholar

Moore, K. and Lewis, D., Birth of the Multinational: 2000 Years of Ancient Business History, from Ashur to Augustus (Copenhagen Business School Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Mougayar, W., The Business Blockchain: Promise, Practice, and Application of the Next Internet Technology (Wiley, 2016)Google Scholar

Muchlinski, P., Multinational Enterprises and the Law (Blackwell Publishers, 1995)Google Scholar

Muchlinski, P. T., Multinational Enterprises & the Law (Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Muscatello, J. R. and Parente, D. H., ‘Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP): A Postimplementation Cross-Case Analysis’ (2006) 19 Information Resources Management Journal; Hershey 61–80Google Scholar

Nag, R., Hambrick, D. C., and Chen, M.-J., ‘What Is Strategic Management, Really? Inductive Derivation of a Consensus definition of the Field’ (2007) 28 Strategic Management Journal 935–55Google Scholar

de Nardis, E. S. and Tonello, M., ‘Know Your Shareholders: The Use of Cash-Settled Equity Derivatives to Hide Corporate Ownership Interests’ (2010) Conference Board Director NotesGoogle Scholar

Nikolicza, P. J., ‘Hungary’ in Fleckner, A. M., Hopt, K. J. (eds.), Comparative Corporate Governance (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 572–603Google Scholar

North American Co. v S.E.C., 66 Sup. Ct. 785 (1946)Google Scholar

O’Brien, James A., Management Information Systems (McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2011)Google Scholar

O’Brien, D., Sharkey Scott, P., and Gibbons, P., ‘Subsidiary Strategy and the Role of the Subsidiary Manager: Integrating the Middle Manager Perspective’ Academy of International Business Conference (AIB-UKI) (Edinburgh, 2011)Google Scholar

Odendahl, C. and Scheer, A. W., ‘The Concept of Virtual Enterprises and its Relevance for the Maritime Domain’ in Guedes Soares, C., Brodda, J. (eds.), Application of Information Technologies to the Maritime Industry (Edições Salamandra, 1999)Google Scholar

OECD, Harmful Tax Competition: An Emerging Global Issue (OECD, 1998)Google Scholar

OECD, Corporate Governance and the Financial Crisis: Key Findings and Main Messages (2009)Google Scholar

OECD, ‘The Corporate Governance Lessons from the Financial Crisis’ (2009) 2009 OECD Journal: Financial Market Trends 61–87Google Scholar

OECD, Corporate Loss Utilisation through Aggressive Tax Planning (2011)Google Scholar

OECD, Tackling Aggressive Tax Planning through Improved Transparency and Disclosure (2011)Google Scholar

OECD, Hybrid Mismatch Arrangements: Tax Policy and Compliance Issues (2012)Google Scholar

OECD, Addressing Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (2013)Google Scholar

OECD, G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance (OECD, 2015)Google Scholar

O’Leary, D. E., Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Systems, Life Cycle, Electronic Commerce, and Risk (Cambridge University Press, 2000)Google Scholar

Orts, E. W., ‘Shirking and Sharking: A Legal Theory of the Firm’ (1998) 16 Yale Law & Policy Review 265–329Google Scholar

Pacces, A. M., Rethinking Corporate Governance: The Law and Economics of Control Powers (Routledge, 2012)Google Scholar

Palan, R., Tax Havens: How Globalization Really Works (Cornell University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Papadopoulos, T., ‘The European Union Directive on Takeover Bids: Directive 2004/25/EC’ (2008) 6 International and Comparative Corporate Law Journal 13–103Google Scholar

Payne, J., ‘Intermediated Securities and the Right to Vote in the UK’ in Gullifer, L., Payne, J. (eds.), Intermediated Securities. Legal Problems and Practical Issues (Hart Publishing, 2010), pp. 187–217.Google Scholar

Picard, J., ‘Organizational Structures and Integrative Devices in European Multinational Corporations’ (1980) 15 Columbia Journal of World Business 30–35Google Scholar

Pilkington, M., ‘Blockchain Technology: Principles and Applications’ in F. X. Olleros, M. Zhegu (eds.), Research Handbook on Digital Transformations (Edward Elgar, 2016) pp. 225–53Google Scholar

Ponte, S. and Sturgeon, T., ‘Explaining Governance in Global Value Chains: A Modular Theory-Building Effort’ (2014) 21 Review of International Political Economy 195–223Google Scholar

Porta, R. L., Lopez‐De‐Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A., ‘Corporate Ownership Around the World’ (1999) 54 The Journal of Finance 471–517Google Scholar

Porta, R. L., Lopez‐De‐Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R., ‘Investor Protection and Corporate Valuation’ (2002) 57 The Journal of Finance 1147–70Google Scholar

Powell, W., ‘Neither Market Nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization’ (1990) 12 Research in Organizational Behavior 295–336Google Scholar

Powers, W., Troubh, R. S., Winokur, H. S., Corp, Enron, Board of Directors, Special Investigative Committee, and Wilmer, C. & P., Report of Investigation by the Special Investigative Committee of the Board of Directors of Enron Corp. (Diane Pub., 2002)Google Scholar

Radice, H. K. and Hymer, S. (eds.), ‘The Multinational Corporation and the Law of Uneven Development’ International Firms and Modern Imperialism: Selected Readings (Penguin Books, 1975), pp. 37–62Google Scholar

Ramirez, J., Handbook of Corporate Equity Derivatives and Equity Capital Markets (Wiley, 2011)Google Scholar

Raskin, M., ‘The Law and Legality of Smart Contracts’ (2017) 1 Georgetown Law Technology Review 304–41Google Scholar

Reich, R. B., The Work of Nations: Preparing Ourselves for 21st-Century Capitalism (A.A. Knopf, 1991)Google Scholar

Reich-Graefe, R., ‘Changing Paradigms: The Liability of Corporate Groups in Germany’ (2004) 37 Connecticut Law Review 785–818Google Scholar

Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (1992)Google Scholar

Report of the Reflection Group on the European Model Companies Act (2015)Google Scholar

Report of the Reflection Group on the Forum Europium on Company Groups (2015)Google Scholar

Report of the Reflection Group on the Future of EU Company Law (2011)Google Scholar

Ringe, W.-G., ‘Deviations from Ownership-Control Proportionality—Economic Protectionism Revisited’ in Bernitz, U., Ringe, W.-G. (eds.), Company Law and Economic Protectionism: New Challenges to European Integration (Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. 209–40Google Scholar

Ringe, W.-G., ‘Hedge Funds and Risk Decoupling: The Empty Voting Problem in the European Union Berle IV: The Future of Financial and Securities Markets: The Fourth Annual Symposium of the Adolf F. Berle, Jr. Center on Corporations, Law & Society’ (2012) 36 Seattle University Law Review 1027–116Google Scholar

Ringe, W.-G., The Deconstruction of Equity: Activist Shareholders, Decoupled Risk, and Corporate Governance (Oxford University Press, 2016)Google Scholar

Ripken, S. K., ‘The Dangers and Drawbacks of the Disclosure Antidote: Toward a More Substantive Approach to Securities Regulation’ (2006) 58 Baylor Law Review 139–204Google Scholar

Rixen, T., ‘Why Reregulation After the Crisis Is Feeble: Shadow Banking, Offshore Financial Centers, and Jurisdictional Competition’ (2013) 7 Regulation & Governance 435–59Google Scholar

Robé, J.-P., ‘Globalization and Constitutionalization of the World Power System’ in Robé, J.-P., Lyon-Caen, A., Vernac, S. (eds.), Multinationals and the Constitutionalization of the World Power System (Routledge, 2016), pp. 11–52Google Scholar

Robertson, D. H., The Control of Industry (Harcourt, Brace, 1923)Google Scholar

Rostein, A., The End of Money: The Story of Bitcoin, Cryptocurrencies and the Blockchain Revolution (John Murray Learning, 2017)Google Scholar

Ruggie, J. G., ‘Multinationals as Global Institution: Power, Authority and Relative Autonomy’ (2017) 12 Regulation & Governance 317–33Google Scholar

Rutherford, M., ‘Institutional Economics: Then and Now’ (2001) 15 The Journal of Economic Perspectives 173–94Google Scholar

Salomon v A Salomon and Co Ltd (1897)Google Scholar

Schanze, E., ‘Beyond Contracts and Corporation: The Law and Economics of Symbiotic Arrangements’ in Riis, T., Nielsen, R. (eds.), Law and Economics: Methodology and Application (DJØF Publ, 1998)Google Scholar

Scheuch, A., ‘Konzernrecht: An Overview of the German Regulation of Corporate Groups and Resulting Liability Issues’ (2016) 13 European Company Law 191–98Google Scholar

Schneider, H., The German Stock Corporation Act: Bilingual Edition with an Introduction to the Law 2nd ed. (CHBeck, 2000), vol. xviGoogle Scholar

Schwarcz, S. L., ‘Enron and the Use and Abuse of Special Purpose Entities in Corporate Structures’ (2002) 70 University of Cincinnati Law Review 1309–18Google Scholar

Schwarcz, S. L., ‘Rethinking the Disclosure Paradigm in a World of Complexity’ (2004) 2004 University of Illinois Law Review 1–38Google Scholar

Schwarcz, S. L., ‘Information Asymmetry and Information Failure: Disclosure Problems in Complex Financial Markets’ in Sun, W., Stewart, J., Pollard, D. (eds.), Corporate Governance and the Global Financial Crisis (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 95–112Google Scholar

Schwarcz, S. L., ‘Regulating Shadow Banking’ (2011) 31 Review of Banking & Financial Law 619–42Google Scholar

Scott, J., ‘Corporate Groups and Network Structure’ in McCahery, J., Picciotto, S., Scott, C. (eds.), Corporate Control and Accountability: Changing Structures and the Dynamics of Regulation (Clarendon Press, 1993)Google Scholar

Scott, W. R. and Davis, G. F., Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural and Open System Perspectives: Rational, Natural and Open Systems Perspectives (Routledge, 2006)Google Scholar

Shearman & Sterling LLP, I. Institutional Shareholder Services, European Commission, and European Corporate Governance Institute, Report on the Proportionality Principle in the European Union (2006)Google Scholar

Simon, H. A., ‘A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice’ (1955) 69 The Quarterly Journal of Economics 99–118Google Scholar

Simon, H. A., Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization (Macmillan, 1957)Google Scholar

Simon, H. A., ‘Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations’ (1979) 69 The American Economic Review 493–513Google Scholar

Sirkin, H., Young, D., Mosquet, X., Hemerling, J., Rupf, I., Bhattacharya, A., Lebreton, J., and Bradtke, T., ‘Capturing Global Advantage: How Leading Industrial Companies Are Transforming Their Industries by Sourcing and Selling in China, India, and Other Low-Cost Countries’ (2004) 52Google Scholar

Sjåfjell, B., ‘The Core of Corporate Governance: Implications of the Takeover Directive for Corporate Governance in Europe’ (2011101) 22 European Business Law Review 641–708Google Scholar

Sjåfjell, B., ‘Sustainable Companies: Possibilities and Barriers in Norwegian Company Law’ (2013) 11 International and Comparative Corporate Law Journal 1–58Google Scholar

Sjåfjell, B. and Anker-Sørensen, L., ‘Directors´ Duties and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)’ in Birkmose, H. S., Neville, M., Engsig Sørensen, K. (eds.), Boards of Directors in European Companies: Reshaping and Harmonising their Organisation and Duties (Wolters Kluwer, 2013), pp. 153–78Google Scholar

Sjåfjell, B., Johnston, A., Anker-Sørensen, L., and Millon, D., ‘Shareholder Primacy: The Main Barrier to Sustainable Companies’ in Sjafjell, B., Richardson, B. J. (eds.), Company Law and Sustainability (Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 79–147Google Scholar

Sjåfjell, B. and Kjelland, C., ‘Norway: Corporate Governance on the Outskirts of the EU’ in Fleckner, A. M., Hopt, K. J. (eds.), Comparative Corporate Governance (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 702–52Google Scholar

Skeel, D., ‘“Behind the Hedge,” Legal Affairs’ (2005) Legal AffairsGoogle Scholar

Sørgaard, G., ‘Introduction of a Group Definition in the New Accounting Directive: The Impact on Future Accounting Regulation’ (2014) 11 European Company Law 232–36Google Scholar

Spatt, C. S., ‘Complexity of Regulation’ (2012), www.hblr.org/2012/06/complexity-of-regulation/ (accessed March 3, 2019)Google Scholar

Statement Issued by the G20 Leaders, Global Plan for Recovery and Reform (2009)Google Scholar

Stout, L. A., ‘How Deregulating Derivatives Led to Disaster, and Why Re-Regulating Them Can Prevent Another’ (2009) 1 Lombard Street 6–7Google Scholar

Strasser, K. A., ‘Piercing the Veil in Corporate Groups Symposium’ (2004) 37 Connecticut Law Review 637–66Google Scholar

Strasser, K. A. and Blumberg, P. I., ‘Legal Models and Business Realities of Enterprise Groups – Mismatch and Change’ (2009) CLPE Research Paper No. 18/2009Google Scholar

Strasser, K. A. and Blumberg, P. I., ‘Legal Form and Economic Substance of Enterprise Groups: Implications for Legal Policy’ (2011) 1 Accounting, Economics, and Law 1–28Google Scholar

Sugarman, D., ‘Corporate Groups in Europe: Governance, Industrial Organization, and Efficiency in a Post-Modern World’ in Sugarman, D., Teubner, G. (eds.), Regulating Corporate Groups in Europe (Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1990), pp. 13–64Google Scholar

Sugarman, D. and Teubner, G. (eds.), Regulating Corporate Groups in Europe (Nomos, 1990)Google Scholar

Sugarman, D. and Teubner, G., ‘Unitas Multiplex: Corporate Governance in Group Enterprises’ in Sugarman, D., Teubner, G. (eds.), Regulating Corporate Groups in Europe (Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1990), pp. 13–64Google Scholar

Surlemont, B., ‘A Typology of Centres Within Multinational Corporations: An Empirical Investigation’ in Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N. (eds.), Multinational Corporate Evolution and Subsidiary Development (Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1998), pp. 162–88Google Scholar

Susskind, R., ‘From Bespoke to Commodity’ (2006) Legal Tech J. 4–7Google Scholar

Susskind, Richard E., The End of Lawyers?: Rethinking the Nature of Legal Services (Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Szabó, D. G. and Engsig Sørensen, K., ‘Corporate Governance Codes and Groups of Companies: In Search of Best Practices for Group Governance’ (2018) 15 European Company and Financial Law Review 697–731Google Scholar

T-11/89 – Shell v Commission (1992)Google Scholar

T-77/08 – Dow Chemical v Commission (2012)Google Scholar

T-132/07 – Fuji Electric v Commission (2011)Google Scholar

T-314/01 – Avebe v Commission (2006)Google Scholar

Talbot, L., Critical Company Law (Routledge-Cavendish, 2008)Google Scholar

Talmon, S., ‘Determining Customary International Law: The ICJ’s Methodology between Induction, Deduction and Assertion’ (2015) 26 European Journal of International Law 417–43Google Scholar

Taylor, H. O., A Treatise on the Law of Private Corporations (Banks Law Publishing, 1902)Google Scholar

Teichmann, C., ‘Towards a European Framework for Cross-Border Group Management’ (2016) 13 European Company Law 150–157Google Scholar

Teubner, G., ‘Coincidentia Oppositotum: Hybrid Networks Beyond Contract and Organization’ in Amstutz, M., Teubner, G. (eds.), Networks: Legal Issues of Multilateral Co-operation (Hart, 2009), pp. 3–30Google Scholar

Teubner, G., ‘Hybrid Networks Beyond Contract and Organisation’ in Amstutz, M., Teubner, G. (eds.), Networks: Legal Issues of Multilateral Co-operation (Hart Pub, 2009), pp. 3–30Google Scholar

Teubner, G., Networks as Connected Contracts: Edited with an Introduction by Hugh Collins UK ed. edition ed. (Hart Publishing, 2011)Google Scholar

The Commission of the European Communities, ‘Commission Recommendation of 11 October 2007 on the electronic network of officially appointed mechanisms for the central storage of regulated information referred to in Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council’ (2007)Google Scholar

The European Union Blockchain Observatory & Forum, Blockchain Innovation in Europe (2018)Google Scholar

The Financial Services Authority, The Turner Review: A Regulatory Response to the Global Banking Crisis (2009)Google Scholar

The Issing Committee, New Financial Order Recommendations by the Issing Committee (2009)Google Scholar

Thiemann, M., ‘“Out of the Shadows?” Accounting for Special Purpose Entities in European Banking Systems’ (2012) 16 Competition & Change 37–55Google Scholar

Timberg, S., ‘Corporate Fictions. Logical, Social and International Implications’ (1946) 46 Columbia Law Review 533–80Google Scholar

UK Government, “Income and Corporation Taxes Act (ICTA)” (1988), www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/1/contents/enacted (accessed September 9, 2021)Google Scholar

UN. Economic and Social Council, Code of Conduct on Transnational Corporations (1987)Google Scholar

UNCTAD, World Investment Report 1997: Transnational Corporations, Market Structure and Competition Policy (United Nations, 1997)Google Scholar

UNCTAD, World Investment Report 2002: Transnational Corporations and Export Competitiveness (United Nations, 2002)Google Scholar

UNCTAD, World Investment Report 2011: Non-equity Modes of International Production and Development (United Nations, 2011)Google Scholar

UNCTAD, World Investment Report 2013: Global Value Chains – Investment and Trade for Development (UN, 2013)Google Scholar

UNCTAD, World Investment Report 2016: Investor Nationality – Policy Challenges (UN, 2016)Google Scholar

United Nations Economic and Social Council, ‘Work on the Formulation of the United Nations Code of Conduct on Transnational Corporations (E/C10/1985/5/2, 22 May 1985)’Google Scholar

United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Bear Stearns Co., Quarterly Report (Form 10-Q) (2008)Google Scholar

Van Rijsbergen, M., ‘On the Enforceability of EU Agencies’ Soft Law at the National Level: The Case of the European Securities and Markets Authority’ (2014) 10 Utrecht Law Review 116–31Google Scholar

Vanderkerckhove, K., Piercing the Corporate Ceil: A Transnational Approach (Kluwer Law International, 2008)Google Scholar

Veblen, T., The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions (George Allen & Unwin, 1899)Google Scholar

Veblen, T., The Theory of Business Enterprise (C. Scribner’s Sons, 1904)Google Scholar

Veldman, J., ‘The Separate Legal Entity and the Architecture of the Modern Corporation’ in Boeger, N., Villiers, C. (eds.), Shaping the Corporate Landscape towards Corporate Reform and Enterprise Diversity (Hart Publishing, 2018), pp. 61–75Google Scholar

Vermeulen, E., ‘Beneficial Ownership and Control: A Comparative Study – Disclosure, Information and Enforcement’ (2013)Google Scholar

Vermeulen, E. and Fenwick, M., ‘Disclosure of Beneficial Ownership after the Panama Papers’ (2016) Corporate Governance Knowledge Publication, FocusGoogle Scholar

Verrecchia, R. E., ‘Discretionary Disclosure’ (1983) 5 Journal of Accounting and Economics 179–94Google Scholar

Weinstein, O., ‘The Current State of the Economic Theory’ in Canziani, A., Kirat, T., Biondi, Y. (eds.), The Firm as an Entity: Implications for Economics, Accounting and the Law (Routledge, 2007), pp. 21–53.Google Scholar

Weitzenboeck, E. M., ‘Between contract and partnership: dynamic networks as collaborative contracts and more’ Faculty of Law, University of Oslo 2010Google Scholar

Weitzenboeck, E. M., A Legal Framework for Emerging Business Models: Dynamic Networks as Collaborative Contracts (Edward Elgar, 2012)Google Scholar

Whaley, R. E., ‘Derivatives’ in Constantinides, G. M., Harris, M., Stulz, R. M. (eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance (Elsevier, 2003), pp. 1129–206Google Scholar

Winter, J. W., Schans Christensen, J., Garrido Garcia, J. M., Hopt, K. J., Rickford, J., Rossi, G., and Simon, J., Report of the High Level Group of Company Law Experts on Issues Related to Takeover Bids in the European Union (2002)Google Scholar

Wood, P. R., ‘International Legal Risk for Banks and Corporates’ (2014) 1 A Production of the Allen & Overy Global Law Intelligence UnitGoogle Scholar

Worster, W. T., ‘The Inductive and Deductive Methods in Customary International Law Analysis: Traditional and Modern Approaches’ (2013) 45 Georgetown Journal of International Law 445–522Google Scholar

Woxholth, J., Aksjonæravtaler 3 ed. (Gyldendal akademisk, 2017)Google Scholar

Wright, A. and De Filippi, P., ‘Decentralized Blockchain Technology and the Rise of Lex Cryptographia’ (2015)Google Scholar

Wright, D., Final Report of the Committee of Wise Men on the Regulation of European Securities Markets (‘Lamfalussy report’) (European Commission, 2001)Google Scholar

Wu, J.-H. and Wang, Y.-M., ‘Measuring ERP Success: The Key-Users’ Viewpoint of the ERP to Produce a Viable IS in the Organization’ (2007) 23 Computers in Human Behavior 1582–96Google Scholar

Yermack, D., ‘Corporate Governance and Blockchains’ (2017) 21 Review of Finance 7–31Google Scholar

Yeung, H. W. and Coe, N., ‘Toward a Dynamic Theory of Global Production Networks’ (2015) 91 Economic Geography 29–58Google Scholar

Zetzsche, D. A., ‘Hidden Ownership in Europe: BAFin’s Decision in Schaeffler v. Continental’ (2009) 10 European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR) 115–47Google Scholar

Zetzsche, D. A., ‘Against Mandatory Disclosure of Economic-only Positions Referenced to Shares of European Issuers – Twenty Arguments against the CESR Proposal’ (2010) 11 European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR) 231–52Google Scholar

Zetzsche, D. A., ‘Continental AG vs. Schaeffler, Hidden Ownership and European Law – Matter of Law or Enforcement?’, (2009) 10 European Business Organization Law Review (EBOR) 115–47Google Scholar

Zrilič, J., ‘Mapping Paper on the Barriers and Possibilities for Integrating Environmental Sustainability into Slovenian Company Law’Google Scholar