Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2010
  • Online publication date: May 2010

Section 2 - Practical issues in transesophageal echocardiography

References

1. SavageRM, LytleBW, AronsonS, et al. Intraoperative echocardiography is indicated in high-risk coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 64: 368–74.
2. MishraM, ChauhanR, SharmaKK, et al. Real-time intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography: how useful? Experience of 5,016 cases. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1998; 12: 625–32.
3. ClickR, AbelM, SchaffHV. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography: 5-year prospective review of impact on surgical management. Mayo Clin Proc 2000; 75: 241–7.
4. QaddouraFE, AbelMD, MecklenburgKL, et al. Role of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography in patients having coronary artery bypass graft surgeryAnn Thorac Surg 2004; 78: 1586–90.
5. CheitlinMD, ArmstrongWF, AurigemmaGP, et al. ACC/AHA/ASE 2003 guideline update for the clinical application of echocardiography: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASE Committee to Update the 1997 Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography). Circulation 2003; 108: 1146–62.
6. Practice guidelines for perioperative transesophageal echocardiography. A report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Task Force on Transesophageal Echocardiography. Anesthesiology 1996; 84: 986–1006.
7. GrossiEA, BizekisCS, SharonyR, et al. Routine intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography identifies patients with atheromatous aortas: impact on “off-pump” coronary artery bypass and perioperative stroke. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003; 16: 751–5.
8. KolevN, BraseR, SwanevelderJ, et al. The influence of transoesophageal echocardiography on intra-operative decision making. A European multicentre study. European Perioperative TOE Research Group. Anaesthesia 1998; 53: 767–73.
9. BergquistBD, BellowsWH, LeungJM. Transesophageal echocardiography in myocardial revascularization: II. Influence on intraoperative decision making. Anesth Analg 1996; 82: 1139–45.
10. KneeshawJD. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) in the operating room. Br J Anaesth 2006; 97: 77–84.
11. RoachGW, KanchugerM, ManganoCM, et al. Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery. Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group and the Ischemia Research and Education Foundation Investigators. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1857–63.
12. NewmanMF, WolmanR, KanchugerM, et al. Multicenter preoperative stroke risk index for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia (McSPI) Research Group. Circulation 1996; 94 (9 Suppl): II74–80.
13. KatzES, TunickPA, RusinekH, et al. Protruding aortic atheromas predict stroke in elderly patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: experience with intraoperative transesophageal echocardiographyJ Am Coll Cardiol 1992: 20: 70–7.
14. HartmanGS, YaoFF, BruefachM, et al. Severity of aortic atheromatous disease diagnosed by transesophageal echocardiography predicts stroke and other outcomes associated with coronary artery surgery: a prospective study. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 701–8.
15. RoyseC, RoyseA, BlakeD, GriggL. Assessment of thoracic aortic atheroma by echocardiography: a new classification and estimation of risk of dislodging atheroma during three surgical techniques. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 4: 72–7.
16. HartmanGS, PetersonJ, KonstadtSN, et al. High reproducibility in the interpretation of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiographic evaluation of aortic atheromatous disease. Anesth Analg 1996; 82: 539–43.
17. KonstadtSN, ReichDL, QuintanaC, LevyM. The ascending aorta: how much does transesophageal echocardiography see?Anesth Analg 1994; 78: 240–4.
18. Dávila-RománVG, PhillipsKJ, DailyBB, et al. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography and epiaortic ultrasound for assessment of atherosclerosis of the thoracic aorta. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 942–7.
19. SylivrisS, CalafioreP, MatalanisP, et al. The intraoperative assessment of ascending aortic atheroma; epiaortic imaging is superior to both transesophageal echocardiography and direct palpation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1997; 11: 704–7.
20. GlasKE, SwaminathanM, ReevesST, et al. Council for Intraoperative Echocardiography of the American Society of Echocardiography; Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. Guidelines for the performance of a comprehensive intraoperative epiaortic ultrasonographic examination: recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists; endorsed by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007; 20: 1227–35.
21. LiYL, WongDT, WeiW, LiuJ. A novel acoustic window for trans-oesophageal echocardiography by using a saline-filled endotracheal balloon. Br J Anaesth 2006; 97: 624–9.
22. HarringerW. Capture of particulate emboli during cardiac procedures in which aortic cross-clamp is used. International Council of Emboli Management Study Group. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70: 1119–23.
23. BanburyMK, KouchoukosNT, AllenKB, et al. Emboli capture using the Embol-X intraaortic filter in cardiac surgery: a multicentered randomized trial of 1,289 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76: 508–15.
24. ChristensonJT, ValaDL, LickerM, et al. Intra-aortic filtration: capturing particulate emboli during aortic cross-clamping. Tex Heart Inst J 2005; 32: 515–21.
25. MedalionB, MeirsonD, HauptmanE, SassonL, SchachnerA. Initial experience with the Heartstring proximal anastomotic system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 128: 273–7.
26. TrehanN, MishraM, KasliwalRR, MishraA. Surgical strategies in patients at high risk for stroke undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Thorac Surg 2000; 70: 1037–45.
27. RakowskiH, PearlmanAS. Preventing perioperative stroke: look, but don’t touch!Am Heart J 1999; 138: 609–11.
28. SukernikMR, MetsB, KachulisB, et al. The impact of newly diagnosed patent foramen ovale in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: case series of eleven patients. Anesth Analg 2002; 95: 1142–6.
29. DjaianiG, Phillips-ButeB, PodgoreanuM, et al. The association of patent foramen ovale and atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 585–9.
30. ManningWJ, WeintraubRM, WaksmonskiCA, et al. Accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography for identifying left atrial thrombi: a prospective, intraoperative study. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123: 817–22.
31. KocaV, BozatT, AkkayaV, et al. Left atrial thrombus detection with multiplane transesophageal echocardiography: an echocardiographic study with surgical verification. J Heart Valve Dis 1999; 8: 63–6.
32. OmranH, JungW, RabahiehR, et al. Imaging of thrombi and assessment of left atrial appendage function: a prospective study comparing transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography. Heart 1999; 81: 192–8.
33. Dal-BiancoJP, KhanderiaBK, MookadamF, et al. Management of asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52; 1279–92.
34. BonowRO, CarabelloBA, ChatterjeeK, et al. 2008 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. A Report of the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2008; 118: e523–661.
35. VahanianA, BaumgartnerH, BaxJ, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: the Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 230–68.
36. Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland. National Adult Cardiac Surgical Database Report. Henley-on-Thames: Dendrite Clinical Systems, 2001.
37. FilsoufiF, AklogL, AdamsDH, ByrneJG. Management of mild to moderate aortic stenosis at the time of coronary artery bypass grafting. J Heart Valve Dis 2002; 11 (Suppl. 1): S45–9.
38. AkasakaT, YoshikawaJ, YoshidaK, et al. Age-related valvular regurgitation: a study by pulsed Doppler echocardiography. Circulation 1987; 76: 262–5.
39. MoisaRB, ZeldisSM, AlperSA, ScottWC. Aortic regurgitation in coronary artery bypass grafting: implications for cardioplegia administration. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60: 665–8.
40. HarrisKM, SundtTM, AeppliD, SharmaR, BarzilaiB. Can late survival of patients with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation be impacted by intervention on the valve?Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74: 1468–75.
41. ConnollyMW, GelbfishJS, JacobowitzIJ, et al. Surgical results for mitral regurgitation from coronary artery disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1986; 91: 379–88.
42. DuarteIG, ShenY, MacDonaldMJ, et al. Treatment of moderate mitral regurgitation and coronary disease by coronary bypass alone: late results. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68: 426–30.
43. MallidiHR, PelletierMP, LambJ, et al. Late outcomes in patients with uncorrected mild to moderate mitral regurgitation at the time of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127: 636–44.
44. Di MauroM, Di GiammarcoG, VitollaG, et al. Impact of no-to-moderate mitral regurgitation on late results after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81: 2128–34.
45. PriftiE, BonacchiM, FratiG, et al. Should mild-to-moderate and moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation be corrected in patients with impaired left ventricular function undergoing simultaneous coronary revascularization?J Card Surg 2001; 16: 473–83.
46. Di DonatoM, FrigiolaA, MenicantiL, et al. Moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation and coronary artery bypass surgery: effect of mitral repair on clinical outcome. J Heart Valve Dis 2003; 12: 272–9.
47. FilsoufiF, AklogL, ByrneJG, et al. Current results of combined coronary artery bypass grafting and mitral annuloplasty in patients with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Heart Valve Dis 2004; 13: 747–53.
48. AklogL, FilsoufiF, FloresKQ, et al. Does coronary artery bypass grafting alone correct moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation?Circulation 2001; 104 (12 Suppl. 1): I68–75.
49. BergquistBD, LeungJM, BellowsWH. Transesophageal echocardiography in myocardial revascularization: I. Accuracy of intraoperative real-time interpretation. Anesth Analg 1996; 82: 1132–8.
50. ComunaleME, BodySC, LeyC, et al. The concordance of intraoperative left ventricular wall-motion abnormalities and electrocardiographic S–T segment changes: association with outcome after coronary revascularization. Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia (McSPI) Research Group. Anesthesiology 1998; 88: 945–54.
51. SeebergerMD, CahalanMK, Rouine-RappK, et al. Acute hypovolemia may cause segmental wall motion abnormalities in the absence of myocardial ischemia. Anesth Analg 1997; 85: 1252–7.
52. ShanewiseJS, CheungAT, AronsonS, et al. ASE/SCA guidelines for performing a comprehensive intraoperative multiplane transesophageal echocardiography examination: recommendations of the ASE Council for intraoperative echocardiography and the SCA Task Force for certification in perioperative transesophageal echocardiography. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 870–84.
53. CerqueiraMD, WeissmanNJ, DilsizianV, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002; 105: 539–42.
54. StrattonJR, SpeckSM, CaldwellJH, et al. Relation of global and regional left ventricular function to tomographic thallium-201 myocardial perfusion in patients with prior myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 12: 71–7.
55. HellerLB, AronsonS. Assessment of regional ventricular function. In: SavageRM, AronsonS, eds., Comprehensive Textbook of Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005: 157–69.
56. UrheimS, EdvardsenT, TorpH, AngelsenB, SmisethOA. Myocardial strain by Doppler echocardiography. Validation of a new method to quantify regional myocardial function. Circulation 2000; 102: 1158–64.
57. SimmonsLA, WeidemannF, SutherlandGR, et al. Doppler tissue velocity, strain, and strain rate imaging with transesophageal echocardiography in the operating room: a feasibility study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002; 15: 768–76.
58. HartmannT, KolevN, BlaicherA, SpissC, ZimpferM. Validity of acoustic quantification colour kinesis for detection of left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities: a transoesophageal echocardiographic study. Br J Anaesth 1997; 79: 482–7.
59. CottrellDJ, CornettES, SeiferMS, et al. Diagnosis of an intraoperative aortic dissection by transesophageal echocardiography during routine coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 1254–6.
60. TingleffJ, JoyceFS, PetterssonG. Intraoperative echocardiographic study of air embolism during cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60: 673–7.
61. LinTY, ChiuKM, Wan, MJ, ChuSH. Carbon dioxide embolism during endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting in coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 126: 2011–15.
62. ChavanonO, TremblayI, DelayD, et al. Carbon dioxide embolism during endoscopic saphenectomy for coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 118: 557–8.
63. MartineauA, ArcandG, CoutureP, et al. Transesophageal echocardiographic diagnosis of carbon dioxide embolism during minimally invasive saphenous vein harvesting and treatment with inhaled epoprostenol. Anesth Analg 2003; 96: 962–4.
64. MierdlS, ByhahnC, LischkeV, et al. Segmental myocardial wall motion during minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting using open and endoscopic surgical techniques. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 306–14.
65. KhanNE, De SouzaA, MisterR, et al. A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Eng J Med 2004; 350: 21–8.
66. BuceriusJ, GummertJF, BorgerMA, et al. Stroke after cardiac surgery: a risk factor analysis of 16,184 consecutive adult patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 75: 472–8.
67. SharonyR, GrossiEA, SaundersPC, et al. Propensity case-matched analysis of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with atheromatous aortic disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127: 406–13.
68. TrehanN, MishraM, KasliwalRR, MishraA. Reduced neurological injury during CABG in patients with mobile aortic atheromas: a five-year follow-up study. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70: 1558–64.
69. PlomondonME, ClevelandJC, LudwigST, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass is associated with improved risk adjusted outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 72: 114–19.
70. MoisesVA, MesquitaCB, CamposO, et al. Importance of intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography during coronary artery bypass surgery without cardiopulmonary bypass. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1998; 11: 1139–44.
71. KimKB, LimC, AhnH, YangJK. Intraaortic balloon pump therapy facilitates posterior vessel off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in high risk patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71: 1964–8.
72. ChassotPG, van der LindenP, ZauggM, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: physiology and anaesthetic management. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 400–13.
73. ResanoFG, StamouSC, LoweryRC, CorsoPJ. Complete myocardial revascularization on the beating heart with epicardial stabilisation: anesthetic considerations. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2000; 14: 534–9.
74. LabovitzAJ, LewenMK, KernM, et al. Evaluation of left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction during transient myocardial ischemia produced by angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 10: 748–5.
75. BiswasS, ClementsF, DiodatoL, et al. Changes in systolic and diastolic function during multivessel off-pump coronary bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001; 20: 913–17.
76. WangJ, FilipovicM, RudzitisA, et al. Transesophageal echocardiography for monitoring segmental wall motion during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Anesth Analg 2004; 99: 965–73.
77. ShigaT, TerajimaK, MatsumuraJ, SakamotoA, OgawaR. Local cardiac wall stabilization influences the reproducibility of regional wall motion during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. J Clin Monit Comput 2000; 16: 25–31.
78. OmaeT, KakihanaY, MastunagaA, et al. Hemodynamic changes during off-pump coronary artery bypass anastomosis in patients with coexisting mitral regurgitation: improvement with milrinone. Anesth Analg 2005; 101: 2–8.
79. Lev-RanO, LobermanD, MatsaM, et al. Reduced strokes in the elderly: the benefits of untouched aorta off-pump coronary surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77: 102–7.
80. GrossiEA, BizekisCS, SharonyR, et al. Routine intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography identifies patients with atheromatous aortas: impact on “off-pump” coronary artery bypass and perioperative stroke. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003; 16: 751–5.
81. DorV, Di DonatoM. Ventricular remodeling in coronary artery disease. Curr Opin Cardiol 1997; 12: 533–7.
82. MenicantiL, Di DonatoM. The Dor procedure: what has changed after fifteen years of clinical practice?J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 124: 886–90.
83. OhJK, SewardJB, TajikAJ. Coronary artery disease. In: The Echo Manual. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1999.
84. YamamuraY, YoshikawaJ, YoshidaK, AkasakaT. Echocardiographic findings of subepicardial aneurysm of the left ventricle. Am Heart J 1994; 127: 211–14.
85. CooleyDA, CollinsHA, MorrisGC, ChapmanDW. Ventricular aneurysm after myocardial infarction: surgical excision with the use of temporary cardiopulmonary bypass. J Am Med Assoc 1958; 167: 557–60.
86. JatèneAD. Left ventricular aneurysmectomy: resection or reconstruction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985; 89: 321–31.
87. DorV, KreitmannP, JourdanJ, et al. Interest of physiological closure (circumferential plasty on contractive areas) of left ventricle after resection and endocardectomy for aneurysm or akinetic zone: comparison with classical technique about a series of 209 left ventricular resections (abstract). J Cardiovasc Surg 1985; 26: 73.
88. ElefteriadesJ, SolomonL, SalazarA, et al. Linear left ventricular aneurysmectomy: modern imaging studies reveal improved morphology and function. Ann Thorac Surg 1993; 56: 242–52.
89. KeslerF, FioreA, NaunheimK, et al. Anterior wall left ventricular aneurysm repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992; 103: 841–8.
90. MickleboroughL, MaruyamaH, LiuP, MohamedS. Results of left ventricular aneurysmectomy with a tailored scar excision and primary closure technique. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994; 107: 690–8.
91. GrossiE, ChimitzL, GallowayA, et al. Endoventricular remodeling of left ventricular aneurysm: functional, clinical and electrophysiological results. Circulation 1995; 92 (Suppl II): 98–100.
92. ShapiraO, DavudoffR, HilkertR, et al. Repair of left ventricular aneurysm: long-term results of linear repair versus endoaneurysmectorraphy. Ann Thorac Surg 1997; 63: 401–5.
93. CooleyD. Management of left ventricular aneurysm by intracavity repair. Operative Tech Thorac Surg 1997; 2: 151–60.
94. MenicantiL, Di DonatoM, FrigiolaA, et al. Ischemic mitral regurgitation: intraventricular papillary muscle imbrication without mitral ring during left ventricular restoration. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 123: 1041–50.
95. AgricolaE, OppizziM, MaisanoF, et al. Echocardiographic classification of chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation caused by restricted motion according to tethering pattern. Eur J Echocardiography 2004; 5: 326–34.
96. OtsujiY, KumanohosoT, YoshifukuS, et al. Isolated annular dilatation does not usually cause important functional mitral regurgitation: comparison between patients with lone atrial fibrillation and those with idiopathic or ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 1651–6.
97. YiuSF, Enriquez-SaranoM, TribouilloyC, et al. Determinants of the degree of functional mitral regurgitation in patients with systolic left ventricular dysfunction: a quantitative clinical study. Circulation 2000; 102: 1400–6.
98. RayaT, GayR, LancasterL, et al. Serial changes in left ventricular relaxation and chamber stiffness after large myocardial infarction in rats. Circulation 1988; 77: 1424–31.
99. DicksteinML, SpotnitzHM, RoseEA, BurkhoffD. Heart reduction surgery: an analysis of the impact on cardiac function. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;113: 1032–40.
100. RatcliffeMB, WallaceAW, SalahiehA, et al. Ventricular volume, chamber stiffness, and function after anteroapical aneurysm plication in the sheep. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 119: 115–24.
101. CastelvecchioS, MenicantiL, RanucciM, Di DonatoM. Impact of surgical ventricular restoration on diastolic function: implications of shape and residual ventricular size. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 86: 1849–54.

References

1. MaronBJ, TowbinJA, ThieneG, et al. Contemporary definitions and classification of the cardiomyopathies: an American Heart Association Scientific Statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Heart Failure and Transplantation Committee; Quality of Care and Outcomes Research and Functional Genomics and Translational Biology Interdisciplinary Working Groups; and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention. Circulation 2006; 113: 1807–16.
2. ElliottP, AnderssonB, ArbustiniE, et al. Classification of the cardiomyopathies: a position statement from the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on myocardial and pericardial diseases. Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 270–6.
3. RichardsonP, RapporteurMW, BristowM, et al. Report of the 1995 World Health Organization/International Society and Federation of Cardiology Task Force on the Definition and Classification of Cardiomyopathies. Circulation 1996; 93: 841–2.
4. MaronBJ. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review. JAMA 2002; 287: 1308–20.
5. RobertsR, SigwartU. New concepts in hypertrophic cardiomyopathies, part 1. Circulation 2001; 104: 2113–6.
6. AshrafianH, WatkinsH. Reviews of translational medicine and genomics in cardiovascular disease: new disease taxonomy and therapeutic implications. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 1251–64.
7. RobertsR, SigwartU. New concepts in hypertrophic cardiomyopathies, part 2. Circulation 2001; 104: 2249–52.
8. ElliottPM, PolonieckiJ, DickieS, et al. Sudden death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: identification of high risk patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 2212–8.
9. NaguehSF, BachinskiLL, MeyerD, et al. Tissue Doppler imaging consistently detects myocardial abnormalities in patients with cardiomyopathy and provides a novel means for an early diagnosis before and independently of hypertrophy. Circulation 2001; 104: 128–30.
10. NaguehSF, McFallsJ, MeyerD, et al. Tissue Doppler imaging predicts the development of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in subjects with subclinical disease. Circulation 2003; 108: 395–8.
11. MaronBJ, McKennaWJ, DanielsonGK, et al. ACC/ESC clinical expert consensus document on hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Committee to develop an expert consensus document on hypertrophic cardiomyopathy). Eur Heart J 2003; 24: 1965–91.
12. KapleRK, MurphyRT, DiPaolaLM, et al. Mitral valve abnormalities in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: echocardiographic features and surgical outcomes. Ann Thor Surg 2008; 85: 1527–35.
13. MaronMS, OlivottoI, BetocchiS, et al. Effect of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction on clinical outcome in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. N Eng J Med 2003; 348: 295–303.
14. KuboT, GimenoJR, BahlA, et al. Prevalence, clinical significance and genetic basis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with restrictive phenotype. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 2419–26.
15. McMahonCJ, NaguehSF, PignatelliRH, et al. Characterization of left ventricular diastolic function by tissue Doppler imaging and clinical status in children with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2004; 109: 1756–62.
16. AlizadA, SewardJB. Echocardiographic features of genetic diseases: part 1. Cardiomyopathy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2000; 13: 73–86.
17. MaronMS, FinleyJJ, BosM, et al. Prevalence, clinical significance and natural history of left ventricular apical aneurysms in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2008; 118: 1541–9.
18. KatoTS, NodaA, IzawaH, et al. Discrimination of nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy on the basis of strain rate imaging by tissue Doppler ultrasonography. Circulation 2004; 110: 3808–14.
19. KhamisRY, MayetJ. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy in elite athletes. Heart 2008; 94: 1254–55.
20. BasavarajaiahS, BoraitaA, WhyteG, et al. Ethnic differences in left ventricular remodeling in highly-trained athletes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51: 2256–62.
21. MenonSC, AckermanMJ, OmmenSR, et al. Impact of septal myectomy on left atrial volume and left ventricular diastolic filling patterns: an echocardiographic study on young patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008; 21: 684–8.
22. FaberL, SeggewissH, WelgeD, et al. Echo-guided percutaneous septal ablation for symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy: 7 years of experience. Eur J Echocardiogr 2004; 5: 347–55.
23. MazurW, NaguehSF, LakkisNM, et al. Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after nonsurgical septal reduction therapy for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2001; 103: 1492–6.
24. SorajjaP, ValetiU, NishimuraRA, et al. Outcome of alcohol septal ablation for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2008; 118: 131–9.
25. ThieneG, CorradoD, BassoC. Cardiomyopathies: is it time for a molecular classification?Eur Heart J 2004; 25: 1772–5.
26. EllinorPT, Sasse-KlaassenS, ProbstS, et al. A novel locus for dilated cardiomyopathy, diffuse myocardial fibrosis, and sudden death on chromosome 10q25–26. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 106–11.
27. MestroniL, RoccoC, GregoriD, et al. Familial dilated cardiomyopathy: evidence for genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34: 181–90.
28. ParaskevaidisIA, DodourasT, AdamopoulosS, KremastinosDT. Left atrial functional reserve in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: an echocardiographic dobutamine study. Chest 2002; 122: 1340–7.
29. KwanJ, ShiotaT, AglerD, et al. Geometric differences of the mitral valve apparatus between ischemic and dilated cardiomyopathy with significant mitral regurgitation: real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 2003; 107: 1135–40.
30. DandelM, WengY, SiniawskiH, et al. Prediction of cardiac stability after weaning from left ventricular assist devices in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2008; 118 (suppl 1): S94–105.
31. SumaH, TanabeH, UejimaT, et al. Selected ventriculoplasty for idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy with advanced congestive heart failure: midterm results and risk analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007: 32: 912–16.
32. AmmashNM, SewardJB, BaileyKR, et al. Clinical profile and outcome of idiopathic restrictive cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2000; 101: 2490–6.
33. KaskiJP, SyrrisP, BurchM, et al. Idiopathic restrictive cardiomyopathy in children is caused by mutations in cardiac sarcomeric protein genes. Heart 2008; 94: 1478–84.
34. MogensenJ, KuboT, DuqueM, et al. Idiopathic restrictive cardiomyopathy is part of the clinical expression of cardiac troponin I mutations. J Clin Invest 2003; 111: 209–16.
35. ZhangJ, KumarA, KaplanL, et al. Genetic linkage of a novel autosomal dominant restrictive cardiomyopathy locus. J Med Genet 2005; 42: 663–5.
36. GarciaMJ, RodriguezL, AresM, et al. Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy: assessment of left ventricular diastolic velocities in longitudinal axis by Doppler tissue imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27: 108–14.
37. GorcsanJ. Tissue Doppler echocardiography. Curr Opin Cardiol 2000; 15: 323–9.
38. HaJW, OhJK, LingLH, et al. Annulus paradoxus: transmitral flow velocity to mitral annular velocity ratio is inversely proportional to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure in patients with constrictive pericarditis. Circulation 2001; 104: 976–8.
39. PalkaP, LangeA, DonnellyJE, NihoyannopoulosP. Differentiation between restrictive cardiomyopathy and constrictive pericarditis by early diastolic Doppler myocardial velocity gradient at the posterior wall. Circulation 2000; 102: 655–62.
40. OhJK, TajikAJ, AppletonCP, et al. Preload reduction to unmask the characteristic Doppler features of constrictive pericarditis. Circulation 1997: 95: 796–9.
41. HurrellDG, NishimuraRA, HiganoST, et al. Value of dynamic respiratory changes in left and right ventricular pressures for the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis. Circulation 1996; 93: 2007–13.
42. Di CesareE. MRI of cardiomyopathies. Eur J Radiol 2001; 38; 179–84.
43. FontaineG, GallaisY, FornesP, HébertJL, FrankR. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 250–4.
44. McCrohonJA, JohnAS, LorenzCH, DaviesSW, PennellDJ. Left ventricular involvement in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2002; 105: 1394.
45. McKennaWJ, ThieneG, NavaA, et al. Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. Br Heart J 1994; 71: 215–18.
46. YoergerDM, MarcusF, SherrillD, et al. Echocardiographic findings in patients meeting task force criteria for arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 860–5.
47. MarcusF, TowbinJA, ZarebaW, et al. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C): a multidisciplinary study: design and protocol. Circulation 2003; 107: 2975–8.
48. MaltagliatiA, PepiM. Isolated noncompaction of the myocardium: multiplane transesophageal echocardiography diagnosis in an adult. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2000; 13: 1047–9.
49. Markiewicz-LoskotG, Moric-JaniszewskaE, LoskotM, et al. Isolated ventricular non-compaction: clinical study and genetic review. Europace 2006; 8: 1064–7.
50. KlaassenS, ProbstS, OechslinE, et al. Mutations in sarcomere protein genes in left ventricular noncompaction. Circulation 2008; 117: 2893–901.
51. MonserratL, Hermida-PrietoM, FernandezX, et al. Mutation in the alpha-cardiac actin gene associated with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, left ventricular non-compaction and septal defects. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 1953–61.

References

1. BonowRO, CarabelloBA, KanuC, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation 2006; 114: e84–231.
2. CarabelloBA. What is new in the 2006 ACC/AHA guidelines on valvular heart disease?Curr Cardiol Rep 2008; 10: 85–90.
3. SalemDN, O’GaraPT, MadiasCet al. Valvular and structural heart disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008; 133 (6 Suppl): 593S–629S.
4. KourisN, IkonomidisI, KontogianniD, SmithP, NihoyannopoulosP. Mitral valve repair versus replacement for isolated non-ischemic mitral regurgitation in patients with preoperative left ventricular dysfunction. A long-term follow-up echocardiography study. Eur J Echocardiogr 2005; 6: 435–42.
5. DaimonM, FukudaS, AdamsDH, et al. Mitral valve repair with Carpentier-McCarthy-Adams IMR ETlogix annuloplasty ring for ischemic mitral regurgitation: early echocardiographic results from a multi-center study. Circulation 2006; 114 (1 Suppl): I588–93.
6. GillinovAM, BlackstoneEH, NowickiER, et al. Valve repair versus valve replacement for degenerative mitral valve disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 135: 885–93.
7. AilawadiG, SwensonBR, GirottiME, et al. Is mitral valve repair superior to replacement in elderly patients?Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 86: 77–85.
8. SchaffHV, SuriRM, Enriquez-SaranoM. Indications for surgery in degenerative mitral valve disease. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 19: 97–102.
9. CarabelloBA. Indications for mitral valve surgery. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2004; 45: 407–18.
10. AdamsDH, AnyanwuAC, SugengL, LangRM. Degenerative mitral valve regurgitation: surgical echocardiography. Curr Cardiol Rep 2008; 10: 226–32.
11. BraunbergerE, DelocheA, BerrebiA, et al. Very long-term results (more than 20 years) of valve repair with Carpentier’s techniques in non-rheumatic mitral valve insufficiency. Circulation 2001; 104 (12 Suppl. 1): I8–11.
12. TroianosCA, KonstadtS. Evaluation of mitral regurgitation. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2006; 10: 67–71.
13. KawanoH, MizoguchiT, AoyagiS. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography for evaluation of mitral valve repair. J Heart Valve Dis 1999; 8: 287–93.
14. ShernanSK. Perioperative transesophageal echocardiographic evaluation of the native mitral valve. Crit Care Med 2007; 35 (8 Suppl): S372–83.
15. GalletB. Use of echocardiography in mitral regurgitation for the assessment of its mechanism and etiology for the morphological analysis of the mitral valve. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris) 2003; 52: 70–7.
16. GrewalKS, MalkowskiMJ, PirachaAR, et al. Effect of general anesthesia on the severity of mitral regurgitation by transesophageal echocardiography. J Cardiol 2000; 85: 199–203.
17. GisbertA, SoulièreV, DenaultAY, et al. Dynamic quantitative echocardiographic evaluation of mitral regurgitation in the operating department. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2006; 19: 140–6.
18. IglesiasI. Intraoperative TEE assessment during mitral valve repair for degenerative and ischemic mitral valve regurgitation. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2007; 11: 301–5.
19. MinhajM, PatelK, MuzicD, et al. The effect of routine intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography on surgical management. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2007; 21: 800–4.
20. LambertAS, MillerJP, MerrickSH, et al. Improved evaluation of the location and mechanism of mitral valve regurgitation with a systematic transesophageal echocardiography examination. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 1205–12.
21. ColomboPC, WuRH, WeinerS, et al. Value of quantitative analysis of mitral regurgitation jet eccentricity by color flow Doppler for identification of flail leaflet. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88: 534–40.
22. AikatS, LewisJF. Role of echocardiography in the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with mitral regurgitation. Curr Opin Cardiol 2003; 18: 334–9.
23. RadermeckerMA, LimetR. Carpentier’s functional classification of mitral valve dysfunction. Rev Med Liege 1995; 50: 292–4.
24. LangerF, RodriguezF, ChengA, et al. Posterior mitral leaflet extension: an adjunctive repair option for ischemic mitral regurgitation?J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 131: 868–77.
25. NielsenSL, NygaardH, FontaineAA, et al. Chordal force distribution determines systolic mitral leaflet configuration and severity of functional mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33: 843–53.
26. NordblomP, Bech-HanssenO. Reference values describing the normal mitral valve and the position of the papillary muscles. Echocardiography 2007; 24: 665–72.
27. StanleyAW, AthanasuleasCL, BuckbergGD; RESTORE Group. Left ventricular remodeling and functional mitral regurgitation: mechanisms and therapy. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 13: 486–95.
28. AgricolaE, OppizziM, PisaniM, et al. Ischemic mitral regurgitation: mechanisms and echocardiographic classification. Eur J Echocardiogr 2008; 9: 207–21.
29. DonalE, LevyF, TribouilloyC. Chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Heart Valve Dis 2006; 15: 149–57.
30. KumanohosoT, OtsujiY, YoshifukuS, et al. Mechanism of higher incidence of ischemic mitral regurgitation in patients with inferior myocardial infarction: quantitative analysis of left ventricular and mitral valve geometry in 103 patients with prior myocardial infarction. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 125: 135–43.
31. MahmoodF, LernerAB, MatyalR, KarthikS, MaslowAD. Dobutamine stress echocardiography and intraoperative assessment of mitral valve. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2006; 20: 867–71.
32. RoshanaliF, MandegarMH, YousefniaMA, AlaeddiniF, WannS. Low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography to predict reversibility of mitral regurgitation with CABG. Echocardiography 2006; 23: 31–7.
33. AklogL, FilsoufiF, FloresKQ, et al. Does coronary artery bypass grafting alone correct moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation?Circulation 2001; 104 (12 Suppl. 1): I68–75.
34. ChaputM, HandschumacherMD, TournouxF, et al. Mitral leaflet adaptation to ventricular remodeling: occurrence and adequacy in patients with functional mitral regurgitation. Circulation 2008; 118: 845–52.
35. OtsujiY, GilonD, JiangL, et al. Restricted diastolic opening of the mitral leaflets in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: evidence for increased valve tethering. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 398–404.
36. KimYH, CzerLS, SoukiasianHJ, et al. Ischemic mitral regurgitation: revascularization alone versus revascularization and mitral valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79: 1895–901.
37. TibayanFA, RodriguezF, ZasioMK, et al. Geometric distortions of the mitral valvular-ventricular complex in chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation 2003; 108 (Suppl. 1): II116–21.
38. OmranAS, WooA, DavidTE, et al. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography accurately predicts mitral valve anatomy and suitability for repair. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002; 15: 950–7.
39. ChaudhryFA, UpadyaSP, SinghVP, et al. Identifying patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation for mitral valve repair and replacement: a transesophageal echocardiographic study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2004; 17: 988–94.
40. GazoniLM, KernJA, SwensonBR, et al. A change in perspective: results for ischemic mitral valve repair are similar to mitral valve repair for degenerative disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 84: 750–7.
41. AkarAR, DoukasG, SzafranekA, et al. Mitral valve repair and revascularization for ischemic mitral regurgitation: predictors of operative mortality and survival. J Heart Valve Dis 2002; 11: 793–800.
42. OkadaY, NasuM, TakahashiY, et al. Late results of mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 51: 282–8.
43. RizzaA, SulcajL, GlauberM, et al. Predictive value of less than moderate residual mitral regurgitation as assessed by transesophageal echocardiography for the short-term outcomes of patients with mitral regurgitation treated with mitral valve repair. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2007; 5: 25.
44. ShiranA, MerdlerA, IsmirE, et al. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography using a quantitative dynamic loading test for the evaluation of ischemic mitral regurgitation. Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007; 20: 690–7.
45. DreyfusGD, Souza NetoO, AubertS. Papillary muscle repositioning for repair of anterior leaflet prolapse caused by chordal elongation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 132: 578–84.
46. AgricolaE, OppizziM, MaisanoF, et al. Detection of mechanisms of immediate failure by transesophageal echocardiography in quadrangular resection mitral valve repair technique for severe mitral regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 2003; 91: 175–9.
47. CerfolioRJ, OrzulakTA, PluthJR, HarmsenWS, SchaffHV. Reoperation after valve repair for mitral regurgitation: early and intermediate results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 111: 1177–83.
48. BrownML, AbelMD, ClickRL, et al. Systolic anterior motion after mitral valve repair: is surgical intervention necessary?J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 133: 136–43.

References

1. QizilbashB, CoutureP, DenaultA. Impact of perioperative transesophageal echocardiography in aortic valve replacement. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anaesth 2007; 11: 288–300.
2. NowrangiSK, ConnollyHM, FreemanWK, ClickRL. Impact of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography among patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2001; 14: 863–6.
3. IonescuAA, WestRR, ProudmanC, ButchartEG, FraserAG. Prospective study of routine perioperative transesophageal echocardiography for elective valve replacement: clinical impact and cost-saving implications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2001; 14: 659–67.
4. ShapiraY, VaturiM, WeisenbergDE, et al. Impact of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 78: 579–84.
5. EltzschigHK, RosenbergerP, LöfflerM, et al. Impact of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography on surgical decisions in 12,566 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Ann Thor Surg 2008; 85: 845–52.
6. PouleurAC, le Polain de WarouxJB, PasquetA, et al. Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 26: 1436–43.
7. DonalE, NovaroGM, DeserranoD, et al. Planimetric assessment of anatomic valve area overestimates effective orifice area in bicuspid aortic stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005; 18: 1392–8.
8. OxornD. The intraoperative quantification of aortic stenosis. Anesth Analg 2009; 108: 10–12.
9. KademL, DumesnilJG, RieuR, et al. Impact of systemic hypertension on the assessment of aortic stenosis. Heart 2005; 91: 354–61.
10. ChambersJ. Can high blood pressure mask severe aortic stenosis?J Heart Valve Dis 1998; 7: 277–8.
11. BermejoJ. The effects of hypertension on aortic valve stenosis. Heart 2005; 91: 280–2.
12. LittleSH, ChanKL, BurwashIG. Impact of blood pressure on the Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of aortic stenosis. Heart 2007; 93: 848–55.
13. PibarotP, DumesnilJG. Assessment of aortic valve severity: check the valve but don’t forget the arteries!Heart 2007; 93: 780–2.
14. BaumgartnerH, HungJ, BermejoJ, et al. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009; 10: 1–25.
15. OhJK, TaliercioCP, HolmesDR, et al. Prediction of the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler aortic valve area determination: prospective Doppler-catheterization correlation in 100 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 11: 1227–34.
16. MaslowAD, HaeringJM, HeindelS, et al. An evaluation of prosthetic aortic valves using transesophageal echocardiography: the double-envelope technique. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 509–16.
17. HilberathJN, ShernanSK, SegalS, SmithB, EltzschigHK. The feasibility of epicardial echocardiography for measuring aortic valve area by the continuity equation. Anesth Analg 2009; 108: 17–22.
18. VidaVL, HoehnR, LarrazabalLA, et al. Usefulness of intra-operative epicardial three-dimensional echocardiography to guide aortic valve repair in children. Am J Cardiol 2009; 103: 852–6.
19. TribouilloyCM, Enriquez-SaranoM, FettSL, et al. Application of the proximal flow convergence method to calculate the effective orifice area in aortic regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 1032–9.
20. PiratB, LittleSH, IgoSR, et al. Direct measurement of proximal isovelocity surface area by real-time three-dimensional colour Doppler for quantitation of aortic regurgitant volume: an in vitro validation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009; 22: 306–13.
21. ZoghbiWA, Enriquez-SaranoM, FosterE, et al. Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003; 16: 777–802.
22. TribouilloyCM, Enriquez-SaranoM, BaileyKR, SewardJB, TajikAJ. Assessment of severity of aortic regurgitation using the width of the vena contracta: a clinical Doppler imaging study. Circulation 2000; 102: 558–64.
23. Enriquez-SaranoM, SewardJB, BaileyKR, TajikAJ. Effective regurgitant orifice area: a noninvasive Doppler development of an old hemodynamic concept. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23: 443–51.
24. SuttonDC, KlugerR, AhmedSU, ReimoldSC, MarkJB. Flow reversal in the descending aorta: a guide to intraoperative assessment of aortic regurgitation with transesophageal echocardiography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994; 108: 576–82.
25. MaslowAD, MahmoodF, PoppasA, SinghA. Intraoperative dobutamine stress echocardiography to assess aortic valve stenosis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2006; 20: 862–6.
26. SeebergerMD, SkarvanK, BuserP, et al. Dobutamine stress echocardiography to detect inducible demand ischemia in anesthetized patients with coronary artery disease. Anesthesiology 1998; 88: 1233–9.
27. TornosP, SambolaA, Permanyer-MiraldaG, et al. Long-term outcome of surgically treated aortic regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47: 1012–17.
28. BonowRO, CarabelloBA, ChatterjeeK, et al. 2008 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. A Report of the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2008; 118: e523–661.
29. OdellJA, MullanyCJ, SchaffHV, et al. Aortic valve replacement after previous coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 62: 1424–30.
30. VahanianA, BaumgartnerH, BaxJ, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: the Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 230–68.
31. RuelM, KapilaV, PriceJ, et al. Natural history and predictors of outcome in patients with concomitant functional mitral regurgitation at the time of aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2006; 114: I541–46.
32. GolandS, TrentoA, CzerLS, et al. Thoracic aortic arteriosclerosis in patients with degenerative aortic stenosis with and without coexisting coronary artery disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 85: 113–19.
33. JutleyRS, MasalaN, SosnowskiAW. Transapical aortic cannulation: the technique of choice for type A dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007; 133: 1393–4.
34. TingleffJ, JoyceFS, PettersonG. Intraoperative echocardiographic study of air embolism during cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60: 673–7.
35. LuckieM, KhattarRS. Systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve: beyond hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Heart 2008; 94: 1383–5.
36. RahimtoolaSH. The problem of valve prosthesis–patient mismatch. Circulation 1978; 58: 20–4.
37. BaumgartnerH. The challenge of assessing heart valve prostheses by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009; 22: 394–5.
38. RosenhekR, BinderT, MaurerG, BaumgartnerH. Normal values for Doppler echocardiographic assessment of heart valve prostheses. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003; 16: 1116–27.
39. ShernanSK. Intraoperative three-dimensional echocardiography: ready for primetime?J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009; 22: 27A–28A.
40. SugengL, ShernanSK, SalgoIS, et al. Live three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography: initial experience using the fully-sampled matrix array probe. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 446–9.
41. SchroederRA, MarkJB. Is the valve OK or not? Immediate evaluation of a replaced aortic valve. Anesth Analg 2005; 101: 1288–91.
42. MorocuttiG, GelsominoS, SpedicatoL, et al. Intraoperative transesophageal echo-Doppler evaluation of stentless aortic xenografts. Incidence and significance of moderate gradients. Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 10: 328–32.
43. PopescuWM, ProkopE, ElefteriadesJA, KettK, BarashPG. Phantom aortic valve pressure gradient: discrepancies between cardiac catheterization and Doppler echocardiography. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 1259–62.
44. ChambersJ. Is pressure recovery an important cause of “Doppler aortic stenosis” with no gradient at catheterisation?Heart 1996; 76: 381–3.
45. NiederbergerJ, SchimaH, MaurerG, BaumgartnerH. Importance of pressure recovery for the assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound: role of aortic size, aortic valve area, and direction of the stenotic jet in vitro. Circulation 1996; 94: 1934–40.
46. BachDS. Echocardiographic assessment of stentless aortic bioprosthetic valves. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2000; 13: 941–8.
47. JeanmartH, de KerchoveL, GlineurD, et al. Aortic valve repair: the functional approach to leaflet prolapse and valve-sparing surgery. Ann Thor Surg 2007; 83: S746–51.
48. le Polain de WarouxJB, PouleurAC, GoffinetC, et al. Functional anatomy of aortic regurgitation: accuracy, prediction of surgical reparability and outcome implications of transesophageal echocardiography. Circulation 2007; 116: I264–9.
49. El KhouryG, GlineurD, RubayJ, et al. Functional classification of aortic root/valve abnormalities and their correlation with etiologies and surgical procedures. Curr Opinion Cardiol 2005; 20: 115–21.
50. CosgroveDM, FrazierCD. Aortic valve repair. In: CoxJL, SundtTM, eds. Operative Techniques in Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1996: Vol. 1, 30–7.
51. HopkinsRA. Aortic valve leaflet sparing and salvage surgery: evolution of techniques for aortic root reconstruction. Eur J Cardiothoracic Surg 2003; 24: 886–97.
52. YacoubMH, CohnLH. Novel approaches to cardiac valve repair: from structure to function. Part II. Circulation 2004; 109: 1064–72.
53. MovsowitzHD, LevineRA, HilgenbergAD, IsselbacherEM. Transesophageal echocardiographic description of the mechanisms of aortic regurgitation in acute type A aortic dissection: implications for aortic valve repair. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 884–90.
54. KouchoukosNT, Dávila-RománVG, SprayTL, MurphySF, PerrilloJB. Replacement of the aortic root with a pulmonary autograft in children and young adults with aortic valve disease. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 1–6.
55. ElkinsRC, Knott-CraigCJ, WardKE, McCueC, LaneMM. Pulmonary autograft in children: realized growth potential. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 57: 1387–94.
56. RubayJE, BucheM, El KhouryGA, et al. The Ross operation: mid-term results. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 67: 1355–8.
57. DavidTE, OmranA, WebbG, et al. Geometric mismatch of the aortic and pulmonary root causes aortic insufficiency after the Ross procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 112: 1231–9.
58. Practice guidelines for perioperative transesophageal echocardiography. A report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Task Force on Transesophageal Echocardiography. Anesthesiology 1996; 84: 986–1006.
59. CheitlinMD, ArmstrongWF, AurigemmaGP, et al. ACC/AHA/ASE 2003 guideline update for the clinical application of echocardiography–summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003; 2: 954–70.
60. BonowRO, CarabelloBA, KanuC, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation 2006; 114: e84–231.
61. WaltherT, FalkV, BorgerMA, et al. Minimally invasive transapical beating heart aortic valve implantation: proof of concept. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007; 31: 9–15.
62. WaltherT, SimonP, DeweyT, et al. Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation: multicenter experience. Circulation 2007; 116 (11 Suppl): I240–5.
63. EnderJ, BorgerMA, ScholzM, et al. Cardiac surgery fast-track treatment in a postanesthetic care unit: six-monthresults of the Leipzig fast-track concept. Anesthesiology 2008; 109: 61–6.
64. WaltherT, FalkV, KempfertJ, et al. Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation: the initial 50 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 33: 983–8.
65. GrubeE, SchulerG, BuellesfeldL, et al. Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients using the second- and current third-generation self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis: device success and 30-day clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50: 69–76.
66. WaltherT, ChuMW, MohrFW. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: time to expand?Curr Opin Cardiol 2008; 23: 111–16.
67. ShanewiseJS, CheungAT, AronsonS, et al. ASE/SCA guidelines for performing a comprehensive intraoperative multiplane transesophageal echocardiography examination: recommendations of the ASE Council for intraoperative echocardiography and the SCA Task Force for certification in perioperative transesophageal echocardiography. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 870–84.
68. WaltherT, MohrFW. Aortic valve surgery: time to be open-minded and to rethink. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007; 31: 4–6.

References

1. MoreillonP, QueYA. Infective endocarditis. Lancet 2004; 363: 139–49.
2. HogevikH, OlaisonL, AnderssonR, LindbergJ, AlestigK. Epidemiologic aspects of infective endocarditis in an urban population: a 5-year prospective study. Medicine (Baltimore) 1995; 74: 324–39.
3. BerlinJA, AbrutynE, StromBL, et al. Incidence of infective endocarditis in the Delaware Valley, 1988–1990. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76: 933–6.
4. DelahayeF, GouletV, LacassinF, et al. Characteristics of infective endocarditis in France in 1991: a 1-year survey. Eur Heart J 1995; 16: 394–401.
5. TleyjehIM, SteckelbergJM, MuradHS, et al. Temporal trends in infective endocarditis: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. JAMA 2005; 293: 3022–8.
6. DisseS, AbergelE, BerrebiA, et al. Mapping of a first locus for autosomal dominant myxomatous mitral-valve prolapse to chromosome 16p11.2-p12.1. Am J Hum Genet 1999; 65: 1242–51.
7. ZuppiroliA, RinaldiM, Kramer-FoxR, et al. Natural history of mitral valve prolapse. Am J Cardiol 1995; 75: 1028–32.
8. KimS, KurodaT, NishinagaM, et al. Relationship between severity of mitral regurgitation and prognosis of mitral valve prolapse: echocardiographic follow-up study. Am Heart J 1996; 132: 348–55.
9. McKinseyDS, RattsTE, BisnoAL. Underlying cardiac lesions in adults with infective endocarditis: the changing spectrum. Am J Med 1987; 82: 681–8.
10. SidhuP, O’KaneH, AliN, et al. Mechanical or bioprosthetic valves in the elderly: a 20-year comparison. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71 (5 Suppl): S257–60.
11. VarstelaE. Personal follow-up of 100 aortic valve replacement patients for 1081 patient years. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1998; 87: 205–12.
12. MathewJ, AddaiT, AnandA, et al. Clinical features, site of involvement, bacteriologic findings, and outcome of infective endocarditis in intravenous drug users. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155: 1641–8.
13. BouzaE, MenasalvasA, MuñozP, et al. Infective endocarditis: a prospective study at the end of the twentieth century – new predisposing conditions, new etiologic agents, and still a high mortality. Medicine (Baltimore) 2001; 80: 298–307.
14. GouëlloJP, AsfarP, BrenetO, et al. Nosocomial endocarditis in the intensive care unit: an analysis of 22 cases. Crit Care Med 2000; 28: 377–82.
15. MartinoP, MicozziA, VendittiM, et al. Catheter-related right-sided endocarditis in bone marrow transplant recipients. Rev Infect Dis 1990; 12: 250–7.
16. AbbottKC, AgodoaLY. Hospitalizations for bacterial endocarditis after initiation of chronic dialysis in the United States. Nephron 2002; 91: 203–9.
17. CabellCH, JollisJG, PetersonGE, et al. Changing patient characteristics and the effect on mortality in endocarditis. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162: 90–4.
18. MoreillonP, QueYA, BayerAS. Pathogenesis of streptococcal and staphylococcal endocarditis. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2002; 16: 297–318.
19. BayerAS, SullamPM, RamosM, et al. Staphylococcus aureus induces platelet aggregation via a fibrinogen-dependent mechanism which is independent of principal platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa fibrinogen-binding domains. Infect Immun 1995; 63: 3634–41.
20. HerzbergMC, MacFarlaneGD, GongK, et al. The platelet interactivity phenotype of Streptococcus sanguis influences the course of experimental endocarditis. Infect Immun 1992; 60: 4809–18.
21. DurackDT, LukesAS, BrightDK. New criteria for diagnosis of infective endocarditis: utilization of specific echocardiographic findings. Am J Med 1994; 96: 200–9.
22. BayerAS, WardJI, GinztonLE, ShapiroSM. Evaluation of new clinical criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Am J Med 1994; 96: 211–19.
23. GagliardiJP, NettlesRE, McCartyDE, et al. Native valve infective endocarditis in elderly and younger adult patients: comparison of clinical features and outcomes with use of the Duke criteria and the Duke Endocarditis Database. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 26: 1165–8.
24. NettlesRE, McCartyDE, CoreyGR, LiJ, SextonDJ. An evaluation of the Duke criteria in 25 pathologically confirmed cases of prosthetic valve endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis 1997; 25: 1401–3.
25. Pérez-VázquezA, FariñasMC, Garcia-PalomoJD, et al. Evaluation of the Duke criteria in 93 episodes of prosthetic valve endocarditis: could sensitivity be improved?Arch Intern Med 2000; 160: 1185–91.
26. DoddsGA, SextonDJ, DurackDT, et al. Negative predictive value of the Duke criteria for infective endocarditis. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77: 403–7.
27. HabibG, DerumeauxG, AvierinosJF, et al. Value and limitations of the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33: 2023–9.
28. SekeresMA, AbrutynE, BerlinJA, et al. An assessment of the usefulness of the Duke criteria for diagnosing active infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis 1997; 24: 1185–90.
29. LiJS, SextonDJ, MickN, et al. Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 30: 633–8.
30. BrouquiP, RaoultD. Endocarditis due to rare and fastidious bacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev 2001; 14: 177–207.
31. HoupikianP, RaoultD. Diagnostic methods current best practices and guidelines for identification of difficult-to-culture pathogens in infective endocarditis. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2002; 16: 377–92.
32. HorstkotteD, FollathF, GutschikE, et al. Guidelines on prevention, diagnosis and treatment of infective endocarditis executive summary: the task force on infective endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2004; 25: 267–76.
33. BaddourLM, WilsonWR, BayerAS, et al. Infective endocarditis: diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of complications: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology, Stroke, and Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, American Heart Association: endorsed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Circulation 2005; 111: e394–434.
34. NishimuraRA, CarabelloBA, FaxonDP, et al. ACC/AHA 2008 guideline update on valvular heart disease: focused update on infective endocarditis: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 2008; 118: 887–96.
35. DurackDT. Prevention of infective endocarditis. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 38–44.
36. StromBL, AbrutynE, BerlinJA, et al. Dental and cardiac risk factors for infective endocarditis: a population-based, case-control study. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129: 761–9.
37. van der MeerJT, ThompsonJ, ValkenburgHA, MichelMF. Epidemiology of bacterial endocarditis in the Netherlands, 1. Patient characteristics. Arch Intern Med 1992; 152: 1863–8.
38. van der MeerJT, ThompsonJ, ValkenburgHA, MichelMF. Epidemiology of bacterial endocarditis in the Netherlands, II. Antecedent procedures and use of prophylaxis. Arch Intern Med 1992; 152: 1869–73.
39. LeportC, HorstkotteD, BurckhardtD. Antibiotic prophylaxis for infective endocarditis from an international group of experts towards a European consensus. Eur Heart J 1995; 16 (Suppl B): 126–31.
40. DajaniAS, TaubertKA, WilsonW, et al. Prevention of bacterial endocarditis: recommendations by the American Heart Association. JAMA 1997; 277: 1794–801.
41. EvangelistaA, Gonzalez-AlujasMT. Echocardiography in infective endocarditis. Heart 2004; 90: 614–17.
42. ShapiroSM, YoungE, De GuzmanS, et al. Transesophageal echocardiography in the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Chest 1994; 105: 377–82.
43. ShivelyBK, GuruleFT, RoldanCA, LeggettJH, SchillerNB. Diagnostic value of transesophageal compared with transthoracic echocardiography in infective endocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 18: 391–7.
44. VilacostaI, GraupnerC, San RománJ, et al. Risk of embolization after institution of antibiotic therapy for infective endocarditis. Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 1489–95.
45. Di SalvoG, HabibG, PergolaV, et al. Echocardiography predicts embolic events in infective endocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1069–76.
46. DanielWG, MüggeA, MartinRP, et al. Improvement in the diagnosis of abscesses associated with endocarditis by transesophageal echocardiography. N Eng J Med 1991; 324: 795–800.
47. GraupnerC, VilacostaI, San RománJA, et al. Periannular extension of infective endocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 1204–11.
48. O’GaraPT. Infective endocarditis 2006: indications for surgery. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 2007; 118: 187–98.
49. KupferwasserLI, HafnerG, Mohr-KahalyS, et al. The presence of infection-related antiphospholipid antibodies in infective endocarditis determines a major risk factor for embolic events. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33: 1365–71.
50. ThunyF, Di SalvoG, BelliardO, et al. Risk of embolism and death in infective endocarditis: prognostic value of echocardiography: a prospective multicenter study. Circulation 2005; 112: 69–75.
51. VikramHR, BuenconsejoJ, HasbunR, QuagliarelloVJ. Impact of valve surgery on 6-month mortality in adults with complicated, left-sided native valve endocarditis: a propensity analysis. JAMA 2003; 290: 3207–14.
52. GillinovAM, ShahRV, CurtisWE, et al. Valve replacement in patients with endocarditis and acute neurologic deficit. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 61: 1125–9.
53. ZegdiR, DebiecheM, LatrémouilleC, et al. Long-term results of mitral valve repair in active infective endocarditis. Circulation 2005; 111: 2532–6.
54. YankahAC, PasicM, KloseH, et al. Homograft reconstruction of the aortic root for endocarditis with periannular abscess: a 17-year study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005; 28: 69–75.
55. JohnMD, HibberdPL, KarchmerAW, SleeperLA, CalderwoodSB. Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic valve endocarditis. Optimal management, and risk factors for death. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 26: 1302–9.

References

1. JamiesonWRE. Advanced technologies for cardiac valvular replacement, transcatheter innovations and reconstructive surgery. Surgical Technology International XV Cardiovascular Surgery. Surgical Technology International Online. www.ump.com/15-149-CS-Page1-.html (accessed September 2009).
2. ZoghbiWA, ChambersJB, DumesnilJG, et al. Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and doppler ultrasound: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves. J Am Soc Echocardiog 2009; 22: 975–1014.
3. BonowRO, CarabelloBA, KanuC, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation 2006; 114: e84–231.
4. VahanianA, BaumgartnerH, BaxJ, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: the Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 230–68.
5. DescouturesF, HimbertD, LepageL, et al. Contemporary surgical or percutaneous management of severe aortic stenosis in the elderly. Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 1410–17.
6. ChambersJB, SpiropoulosG. Estimation of the aortic orifice area: comparison of the classical and modified forms of the continuity equation. Am J Noninvasive Cardiol 1993; 7: 259–62.
7. ChambersJ, OoL, NaracottA, LawfordP, BlauthC. Nominal size in six bileaflet mechanical aortic valves: a comparison with orifice size and a biological equivalent. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 125: 1388–93.
8. DumesnilJG, HonosGN, LemieuxM, BeaucheminJ. Validation and applications of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16: 637–43.
9. RajaniR, MukherjeeD, ChambersJ. Doppler echocardiography in normally functioning replacement aortic valves: a review of 129 studies. J Heart Valve Dis 2007; 16: 519–35.
10. RosenhekR, BinderT, MaurerG, BaumgartnerH. Normal values for Doppler echocardiographic assessment of heart valve prostheses. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003; 16: 1116–27.
11. PibarotP, DumesnilJG. Prosthesis–patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention. Heart 2006; 92: 1022–9.
12. BlaisC, DumesnilJG, BaillotR, et al. Impact of prosthesis–patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 2003; 108: 983–8.
13. TascaG, MhagnaZ, PerottiS, et al. Impact of prosthesis–patient mismatch on cardiac events and midterm mortality after aortic valve replacement in patients with pure aortic stenosis. Circulation 2006; 113: 570–6.
14. MohtyD, MaloufJF, GirardSE, et al. Impact of prosthesis–patient mismatch on long-term survival in patients with small St. Jude medical mechanical prostheses in the aortic position. Circulation 2006; 113: 420–6.
15. ZoghbiWA, Enriquez-SaranoM, FosterE, et al. Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003; 16: 777–802.
16. GrunkemeierGL, LiHH, NaftelDC, StarrA, RahimtoolaSH. Long-term performance of heart valve prostheses. Curr Probl Cardiol 2000; 25: 73–154.
17. ConnollyHM, MillerFA, TaylorCL, et al. Doppler hemodynamic profiles of 82 clinically and echocardiographically normal tricuspid valve prostheses. Circulation 1993; 88: 2722–7.
18. KobayashiY, NagataS, OhmoriF, et al. Serial Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of bioprosthetic valves in the tricuspid position. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27: 1693–7.
19. NovaroGM, ConnollyHM, MillerFA. Doppler hemodynamics of 51 clinically and echocardiographically normal pulmonary valve prostheses. Mayo Clin Proc 2001; 76: 155–60.
20. RodriguezRJ, RiggsTW. Physiologic peripheral pulmonary stenosis in infancy. Am J Cardiol 1990; 66: 1478–81.

References

WangZ, GraingerN, ChambersJ . Doppler echocardiography in normally functioning replacement heart valves: a literature review. J Heart Valve Dis 1995; 4: 591–614.
RimingtonH, ChambersJ. Echocardiography: Guidelines for Reporting, 2nd edn. London: Informa Healthcare, 2007.

References

1. European Association of Echocardiography. Accreditation in echocardiography. www.escardio.org/communities/EAE/accreditation/Pages/welcome.aspx (accessed September 2009).
2. WarnesCA, WilliamsRG, BashoreTM, et al. ACC/AHA 2008 guidelines for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: executive summary. Circulation 2008; 118: 2395–451.
3. RigbyML. Transoesophageal echocardiography during interventional cardiac catheterisation in congenital heart disease. Heart 2001; 86 (Suppl 2): II23–9.
4. HoustonA, HillisS, LilleyS, RichensT, SwanL. Echocardiography in adult congenital heart disease. Heart 1998; 80 (Suppl 1): S12–26.
5. HoS, McCarthyK, RigbyM. Anatomy of atrial and ventricular septal defects. J Interven Cardiol 2000; 13: 475–85.
6. ChessaM, CarminatiM, ButeraG, et al. Early and late complications associated with transcatheter occlusion of secundum atrial septal defect. J Am Cardiol 2002; 39: 1061–5.
7. MűggeA, DanielWG, AngermannC, et al. Atrial aneurysm in adult patients: a multicenter study using transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Circulation 1995; 91: 2785–92.
8. AgmonY, KhandheriaBK, MeissnerI, et al. Frequency of atrial septal aneurysms in patients with cerebral ischemic events. Circulation 1999; 99: 1942–4.
9. EwertP, BergerF, VogelM, et al. Morphology of perforated atrial septal aneurysm suitable for closure by transcatheter device placement. Heart 2000; 84: 327–31.
10. ButeraG, CarminatiM, ChessaM, et al. CardioSEAL/STARflex versus Amplatzer devices for percutaneous closure of small to moderate (up to 18 mm) atrial septal defects. Am Heart J 2004; 148: 507–10.
11. KerutEK, NorfleetWT, PlotnickGD, GilesTD. Patent foramen ovale: a review of associated conditions and the impact of physioloical size. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38: 613–23.
12. MasaniND. Transoesophageal echocardiography in adult congenital heart disease. Heart 2001; 86 (Suppl 2): II30–40.
13. OosthoekPW, WeninkAC, WisseLJ, Gittenberger-de GrootAC. Development of the papillary muscles of the mitral valve: morphogenetic background of parachute-like asymmetric mitral valves and other mitral valve anomalies. J Thor Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 116: 36–46.
14. LockJE, BlockPC, McKayRG, BaimDS, KeaneJF. Transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defects. Circulation 1988; 78: 361–8.
15. ThanopoulosBD, TsaousisGS, KaranasiosE, EleftherakisNG, PaphitisC. Transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects with the Amplatzer asymmetric ventricular septal defect occluder: preliminary experience in children. Heart 2003; 89: 918–22.
16. RosenhekR, BinderT. Monitoring of invasive procedures: the role of echocardiography in cathlab and operating room. J Clin Basic Cardiol 2002; 5: 139–43.
17. KananiM, MoormanAF, CookAC, et al. Development of the atrioventricular valves: clinicomorphological correlations. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79: 1797–804.
18. LamersWH, VirághS, WesselsA, MoormanAF, AndersonRH. Formation of the tricuspid valve in the human heart. Circulation 1995; 91: 111–21.
19. KaskiJP, WolfendenJ, JosenM, DaubeneyPE, ShinebourneEA. Can atrioventricular septal defects exist with intact septal structures?Heart 2006; 92: 832–5.
20. FitzsimonsB, KochCG. Parachute mitral valve. Anesth Analg 2005; 101: 1613–14.

References

1. ShanewiseJS, Cheung, AT, AronsonS, et al. ASE/SCA guidelines for performing a comprehensive intraoperative multiplane transesophageal echocardiography examination. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1999; 12: 884–900.
2. CahalanMK, AbelM, GoldmanM, et al. American Society of Echocardiography and Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists task force guidelines for training in perioperative echocardiography. Anesth Analg 2002; 94: 1384–8.
3. CheitlinMD, ArmstrongWF, AurigemmaGP, et al. ACC/AHA/ASE 2003 guideline update for the clinical application of echocardiography: summary article. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASE Committee to Update the 1997 Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography). Circulation 2003; 108: 1146–62.
4. BeaulieuY, MarikPE. Bedside ultrasonography in ICU: part 1. Chest 2005; 128: 881–95.
5. MarikPE, BaramM. Noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Clin 2007; 23: 383–400.
6. VignonP. Hemodynamic assessment of critically ill patients using echocardiography Doppler. Curr Opin Crit Care 2005; 11: 227–34.
7. PriceS, NicolE, GibsonDG, EvansTW. Echocardiography in the critically ill: current and potential roles. Intensive Care Med 2000; 32: 48–59.
8. Vieillard-BaronA, PrinS, CherguiK, DubourgO, JardinF. Hemodynamic instability in sepsis: bedside assessment by Doppler echocardiography. Am J Resp Crit Care 2003; 168: 1270–6.
9. ShahMR, HasselbladV, StevensonLW, et al. Impact of the pulmonary artery catheter in critically ill patients: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA 2005; 294: 1664–70.
10. HarveyS, HarrisonDA, SingerM, et al. PAC-Man study collaboration. Assessment of the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in management of patients in intensive care (PAC-Man): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 366: 472–7.
11. RichardC, WarszawskiJ, AnguelN, et al. Early use of the pulmonary artery catheter and outcomes in patients with shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2003; 290: 2713–20.
12. HüttemannE, SchelenzC, KaraF, ChatzinikolaouK, ReinhartK. The use and safety of TEE in the general ICU: a minireview. Acta Aanaesthesiol Scand 2004; 48: 827–36.
13. JensenMB, SlothE, LarsenKM, SchmidtMB. Transthoracic echocardiography for cardiopulmonary monitoring in intensive care. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004; 21: 700–7.
14. CostachescuT, DenaultA, GuimondJG, et al. The hemodynamically unstable patient in the intensive care unit: hemodynamic vs. transesophageal echocardiographic monitoring. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 1214–23.
15. JosephMX, DisneyPJ, Da CostaR, HutchisonSJ. Transthoracic echocardiography to identify or exclude cardiac cause of shock. Chest 2004; 126: 1592–7.
16. PoelaertJI, SchüpferG. Hemodynamic monitoring utilizing TEE: the relationships among pressure, flow and function. Chest 2005; 127: 379–90.
17. SlamaM, MaizelJ. Echocardiographic measurement of ventricular function. Curr Opin Crit Care 2006; 12: 241–8.
18. CharronC, CailleV, JardinF, Vieillard-BaronA. Echocardiographic measurement of fluid responsiveness. Curr Opin Crit Care 2006; 12: 249–54.
19. JonesAE, TayalVS, SullivanDM, KlineJA. Randomized, controlled trial of immediate versus delayed goal-directed ultrasound to identify the cause of nontraumatic hypotension in emergency department patients. Crit Care Med 2004; 32: 1703–8.
20. PriceS, ViaG, SlothE, et al. Echocardiography practice, training and accreditation in the intensive care: document for the World Interactive Network Focused on Critical Ultrasound (WINFOCUS)Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2008; 6: 49.
21. KornbluthM, LiangDH, PalomaA, SchnittgerI. Native tissue harmonic imaging improves endocardial border definition and visualization of cardiac structures. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1998; 11: 693–701.
22. KornbluthM, LiangDH, BrownP, GessfordE, SchnittgerI. Contrast echocardiography is superior to tissue harmonics for assessment of left ventricular function in mechanically ventilated patients. Am Heart J 2000; 140: 291–6.
23. CookCH, PrabaAC, BeeryPR, MartinLC. Transthoracic echocardiography is not cost-effective in critically ill surgical patients. J Trauma 2002; 52: 280–4.
24. VignonP, MentecH, TerréS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic impact of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU. Chest 1994; 106: 1829–34.
25. ParkerMM, CunnionRE, ParilloJE. Echocardiography and nuclear cardiac imaging in the critical care unit. JAMA 1985; 254: 2935–9.
26. AshrafianH, BogleRG, RosenSD, HeneinM, EvansTW. Portable echocardiography. BMJ 2004; 328: 300–1.
27. BenjaminE, GriffinK, LeibowitzAB, et al. Goal-directed transesophageal echocardiography performed by intensivists to assess left ventricular function: Comparison with pulmonary artery catheterization. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1998; 12: 10–15.
28. HeidenreichPA, StainbackRF, RedbergRF, et al. Transesophageal echocardiography predicts mortality in critically ill patients with unexplained hypotension. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26: 152–8.
29. FontesM, BellowsW, NgoL, ManganoD. Assessment of ventricular function in critically ill patients: limitations of pulmonary artery catheterization. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1999; 5: 521–7.
30. PoelaertJI, TrouerbachJ, De BuyzereM, EveraertJ, ColardynFA. Evaluation of transesophageal echocardiography as a diagnostic and therapeutic aid in a critical care setting. Chest 1995; 107: 774–9.
31. WakePJ, AliM, CarrollJ, SiuSC, ChengDC. Clinical and echocardiographic diagnoses disagree in patients with unexplained hemodynamic instability after cardiac surgery. Can J Anaesth 2001; 48: 778–83.
32. ColreavyFB, DonovanK, LeeKY, WeekesJ. Transesophageal echocardiography in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 989–96.
33. SchmidlinD, SchuepbachR, BernardE, et al. Indications and impact of postoperative transesophageal echocardiography in cardiac surgical patients. Crit Care Med 2001; 29: 2143–8.
34. VociP, MarinoP. Transesophageal echocardiography in critically-ill patients using a miniaturized probe: feasibility, efficacy and indications. Cardiologia 1996; 41: 855–9.
35. SpencerKT, KraussD, ThurnJ, et al. Transnasal transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1997; 10: 728–37.
36. KhouryAF, AfridiI, QuiñonesMA, ZoghbiWA. Transesophageal echocardiography in critically ill patients: feasibility, safety and impact on management. Am Heart J 1994; 127: 1363–71.
37. HwangJJ, ShyuKG, ChenJJ, et al. Usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography in the treatment of critically ill patients. Chest 1993; 104: 861–6.
38. TroianosCA, PorembkaDT. Assessment of left ventricular function and hemodynamics with transesophageal echocardiography. Crit Care Clin 1996; 12: 253–72.
39. ClementsFM, HarpoleDH, QuillT, JonesRH, McCannRL. Estimation of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by two-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography: comparison of short axis imaging and simultaneous radionuclide angiography. Br J Anaesth 1990; 64: 331–6.
40. FeinbergMS, HopkinsWE, Davila-RomanVG, BarzilaiB. Multiplane transesophageal echocardiographic Doppler imaging accurately determines cardiac output measurements in critically ill patients. Chest 1995; 107: 769–73.
41. DabaghiSF, RokeyR, RiveraJM, SalibaWI, MajidPA. Comparison of echocardiographic assessment of hemodynamics in the intensive care unit with right-sided cardiac catheterization. Am J Cardiol 1995; 6: 392–5.
42. AppletonCP, FirstenbergMS, GarciaMJ, ThomasJD. The echo-Doppler evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function: a current perspective. Cardiol Clin 2000; 18: 513–46.
43. BreitkreutzR, WalcherF, SeegerF. Focused echocardiographic evaluation in resuscitation management: concept of an advanced life support-conformed algorithm. Crit Care Med 2007; 35: S150–61.
44. ChirilloF, TotisO, CavarzeraniA, et al. Usefulness of transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography in recognition and management of cardiovascular injuries after blunt chest trauma. Heart 1996; 75: 301–6.
45. SmithMD, CassidyJM, SoutherS, et al. Transesophageal echocardiography in the diagnosis of traumatic rupture of the aorta. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 356–62.
46. CatoireP, OrliaguetG, LiuN, et al. Systematic transesophageal echocardiography for detection of mediastinal lesions in patients with multiple injuries. J Trauma 1995; 38: 96–102.
47. VlahakesGJ, WarrenRL. Traumatic rupture of the aorta. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 389–90.
48. GoldsteinSA, MintzGS, LindsayJ. Aorta: comprehensive evaluation by echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1993; 6: 634–59.
49. FernandezLG, LainKY, MessersmithRN, et al. Transesophageal echocardiography for diagnosing aortic injury: a case report and summary of current imaging techniques. J Trauma 1994; 36: 877–80.
50. HeathMJS, DicksteinML. Perioperative management of the left ventricular assist device recipient. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2000; 43: 47–54.
51. StoddardMF, LongakerRA. The role of transesophageal echocardiography in cardiac donor screening. Am Heart J 1993; 125: 1676–81.
52. ZaroffJG, RosengardBR, ArmstrongWF, et al. Consensus conference report: maximizing use of organs recovered from the cadaver donor. Circulation 2002; 106: 836–41.

References

1. DekkerDL, PizialiRL, DongE. A system for ultrasonically imaging the human heart in three dimensions. Computers and Biomedical Research 1974; 7: 544–53.
2. MatsumotoM, MatsuoH, KitabatakeA, et al. Three-dimensional echocardiograms and two-dimensional echocardiographic images at desired planes by a computerized system. Ultrasound Med Biol 1977; 3: 163–78.
3. GeiserEA, LupkiewiczSM, ChristieLG, et al. A framework for three-dimensional time-varying reconstruction of the human left ventricle: sources of error and estimation of their magnitude. Comput Biomed Res 1980; 13: 225–41.
4. GhoshA, NandaNC, MaurerG. Three-dimensional reconstruction of echo-cardiographic images using the rotation method. Ultrasound Med Biol 1982; 8: 655–61.
5. NixonJV, SafferSI, LipscombK, BlomqvistCG. Three-dimensional echoventriculography. Am Heart J 1983; 106: 435–43.
6. SnyderJE, KissloJ, von RammO. Real-time orthogonal mode scanning of the heart. I. System design. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986; 7: 1279–85.
7. FultonDR, MarxGR, PandianNG, et al. Dynamic three-dimensional echocardiographic imaging of congenital heart defects in infants and children by computer-controlled tomographic parallel slicing using a single integrated ultrasound instrument. Echocardiography 1994; 11: 155–64.
8. MartinRW, BasheinG, ZimmerR, SutherlandJ. An endoscopic micromanipulator for multiplanar transesophageal imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 1986; 12: 965–75.
9. PandianNG, NandaNC, SchwartzSL, et al. Three-dimensional and four-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic imaging of the heart and aorta in humans using a computed tomographic imaging probe. Echocardiography 1992; 9: 677–87.
10. SapinPM, SchroederKD, SmithMD, DeMariaAN, KingDL. Three-dimensional echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular volume in vitro: comparison with two-dimensional echocardiography and cineventriculography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 1530–7.
11. RoelandtJR, ten CateFJ, VletterWB, TaamsMA. Ultrasonic dynamic three-dimensional visualization of the heart with a multiplane transesophageal imaging transducer. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1994; 7: 217–29.
12. KissloJ, FirekB, OtaT, et al. Real-time volumetric echocardiography: the technology and the possibilities. Echocardiography 2000; 17: 773–9.
13. PuaEC, IdrissSF, WolfPD, SmithSW. Real-time 3D transesophageal echocardiography. Ultrason Imaging 2004; 26: 217–32.
14. YangHS, BansalRC, MookadamF, et al. Practical guide for three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography using a fully sampled matrix array transducer. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008; 21: 979–89.
15. Garcia-OrtaR, MorenoE, VidalM, et al. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in mitral valve repair. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007; 20: 4–12.
16. MandaJ, KesanollaSK, HsuingMC, et al. Comparison of real time two-dimensional with live/real time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in the evaluation of mitral valve prolapse and chordae rupture. Echocardiography 2008; 25: 1131–7.
17. GrewalJ, MankadS, FreemanWK, et al. Real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in the intraoperative assessment of mitral valve disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009; 22: 34–41.
18. JungwirthB, MackensenGB. Real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography in the operating room. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2008; 12: 248–64.
19. EnderJ, Koncar-ZehJ, MukherjeeC, et al. Value of augmented reality-enhanced transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for determining optimal annuloplasty ring size during mitral valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 86: 1473–8.
20. SugengL, ShernanSK, WeinertL, et al. Real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in valve disease: comparison with surgical findings and evaluation of prosthetic valves. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008; 21: 1347–54.
21. JungwirthB, AdamsDB, MathewJP, et al. Mitral valve prolapse and systolic anterior motion illustrated by real time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 1822–4.
22. SugengL, ShernanSK, SalgoIS, et al. Live 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography: initial experience using the fully-sampled matrix array probe. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 446–9.
23. TschernichHD, MoraB, HiesmayrM. Visibility of cardiac valves using real-time 3D-transoesophageal echocardiography (RT3D-TOE) in the OR: a feasibility study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2008; 22: S8.
24. ScohyTV, SolimanOI, LecomtePV, et al. Intraoperative real time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic measurement of hemodynamic, anatomic and functional changes after aortic valve replacement. Echocardiography 2009; 26: 96–9.
25. Blot-SouletieN, HébrardA, AcarP, CarriéD, PuelJ. Comparison of accuracy of aortic valve area assessment in aortic stenosis by real time three-dimensional echocardiography in biplane mode versus two-dimensional transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Echocardiography 2007; 24: 1065–72.
26. ArmenTA, VandseR, BickleK, NathanN. Three-dimensional echocardiographic evaluation of an incidental quadricuspid aortic valve. Eur J Echocardiogr 2008; 9: 318–20.
27. MedinaHM, VazquezJ, PritchettA, LakkisN, DokainishH. Comprehensive imaging including three-dimensional echocardiography of an infected, ruptured sinus of Valsalva aneurysm. Echocardiography 2007; 24: 1096–8.
28. MalagoliA, BarbieriA, ModenaMG. Bicuspid aortic valve regurgitation: quantification of anatomic regurgitant orifice area by 3D transesophageal echocardiography reconstruction. Echocardiography 2008; 25: 797–8.
29. Abdel-MassihT, DulacY, TaktakA, et al. Assessment of atrial septal defect size with 3D-transesophageal echocardiography: comparison with balloon method. Echocardiography 2005; 22: 121–7.
30. ScohyTV, LecomtePV, McGhieJ, et al. Intraoperative real time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic evaluation of right atrial tumor. Echocardiography 2008; 25: 646–9.
31. ShahSJ, BardoDM, SugengL, et al. Real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography of the left atrial appendage: initial experience in the clinical setting. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008; 21: 1362–8.
32. CaianiEG, CorsiC, ZamoranoJ, et al. Improved semiautomated quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using 3-dimensional echocardiography with a full matrix-array transducer: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005; 18: 779–88.
33. CorsiC, LangRM, VeronesiF, et al. Volumetric quantification of global and regional left ventricular function from real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic images. Circulation 2005; 112: 1161–70.
34. SolimanOI, KrenningBJ, GeleijnseML, et al. Quantification of left ventricular volumes and function in patients with cardiomyopathies by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: a head-to-head comparison between two different semiautomated endocardial border detection algorithms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007; 20: 1042–9.
35. SugengL, Mor-AviV, WeinertL, et al. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function: side-by-side comparison of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with magnetic resonance reference. Circulation 2006; 114: 654–61.
36. NiemannPS, PinhoL, BalbachT, et al. Anatomically oriented right ventricular volume measurements with dynamic three-dimensional echocardiography validated by 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50: 1668–76.

References

1. IsaazK, EthevenotG, AdmantP, BrembillaB, PernotC. A new Doppler method of assessing left ventricular ejection force in chronic congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 1989; 64: 81–7.
2. IsaazK, ThompsonA, EthevenotG, et al. Doppler echocardiographic measurement of low velocity motion of the left ventricular posterior wall. Am J Cardiol 1989; 64: 66–75.
3. McDickenWN, SutherlandGR, MoranCM, GordonLN. Colour Doppler velocity imaging of the myocardium. Ultrasound Med Biol 1992; 18: 651–4.
4. HeimdalA, StoylenA, TorpH, SkjaerpeT. Real-time strain rate imaging of the left ventricle by ultrasound. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1998; 11: 1013–19.
5. BrodinLA, van der LindenJ, OlstadB. Echocardiographic functional images based on tissue velocity information. Herz 1998; 23: 491–8.
6. SutherlandGR, KukulskiT, VoightJU, D’HoogeJ. Tissue Doppler echocardiography: future developments. Echocardiography 1999; 16: 509–20.
7. HatleL, SutherlandGR. Regional myocardial function: a new approach. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 1337–57.
8. KaluzynskiK, ChenX, EmelianovSY, SkovorodaAR, O’DonnellM. Strain rate imaging using two-dimensional speckle tracking. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2001; 48: 1111–23.
9. RappaportD, AdamD, LysyanskyP, RiesnerS. Assessment of myocardial regional strain and strain rate by tissue tracking in B-mode echocardiograms. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006; 32: 1181–92.
10. LeitmanM, LysyanskyP, SidenkoS, et al. Two-dimensional strain: a novel software for real-time quantitative echocardiographic assessment of myocardial function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2004; 17: 1021–9.
11. SimmonsLA, WeidemannF, SutherlandGR, et al. Doppler tissue velocity, strain, and strain rate imaging with transesophageal echocardiography in the operating room: a feasibility study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002; 15: 768–76.
12. CheungMM, LiJ, WhitePA, et al. Doppler tissue echocardiography: can transesophageal echocardiography be used to acquire functional data?J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003; 16: 732–7.
13. SkarvanK, FilipovicM, WangJ, BrettW, SeebergerM. Use of myocardial tissue Doppler imaging for intraoperative monitoring of left ventricular function. Br J Anaesth 2003; 91: 473–80.
14. NorrildK, PedersenTF, SlothE. Transesophageal tissue Doppler echocardiography for evaluation of myocardial function during aortic valve replacement. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2007; 21: 367–70.
15. Sanchez-QuintanaD, ClimentV, HoSY, AndersonRH. Myoarchitecture and connective tissue in hearts with tricuspid atresia. Heart 1999; 81: 182–91.
16. VogelM, SchmidtMR, KristiansenSB, et al. Validation of myocardial acceleration during isovolumic contraction as a novel noninvasive index of right ventricular contractility: comparison with ventricular pressure-volume relations in an animal model. Circulation 2002; 105: 1693–9.
17. VogelM, CheungMM, LiJ, et al. Noninvasive assessment of left ventricular force–frequency relationships using tissue Doppler-derived isovolumic acceleration: validation in an animal model. Circulation 2003; 107: 1647–52.
18. MissantC, RexS, ClausP, MertensL, WoutersPF. Load-sensitivity of regional tissue deformation in the right ventricle: isovolumic versus ejection-phase indices of contractility. Heart 2008; 94: e15.
19. KukulskiT, HubbertL, ArnoldM, et al. Normal regional right ventricular function and its change with age: a Doppler myocardial imaging study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2000; 13: 194–204.
20. KowalskiM, KukulskiT, JamalF, et al. Can natural strain and strain rate quantify regional myocardial deformation? A study in healthy subjects. Ultrasound Med Biol 2001; 27: 1087–97.
21. CamiciPG, PrasadSK, RimoldiOE. Stunning, hibernation, and assessment of myocardial viability. Circulation 2008; 117: 103–14.
22. GreenbergNL, FirstenbergMS, CastroPL, et al. Doppler-derived myocardial systolic strain rate is a strong index of left ventricular contractility. Circulation 2002; 105: 99–105.
23. NaguehSF, MiddletonKJ, KopelenHA, ZoghbiWA, QuiñonesMA. Doppler tissue imaging: a noninvasive technique for evaluation of left ventricular relaxation and estimation of filling pressures. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30: 1527–33.
24. HillisGS, MollerJE, PellikkaPA, et al. Noninvasive estimation of left ventricular filling pressure by E/e′ is a powerful predictor of survival after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 360–7.
25. OmmenSR, NishimuraRA, AppletonCP, et al. Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of left ventricular filling pressures: a comparative simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study. Circulation 2000; 102: 1788–94.
26. PaulusWJ, TschöpeC, SandersonJE, et al. How to diagnose diastolic heart failure: a consensus statement on the diagnosis of heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction by the Heart Failure and Echocardiography Associations of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 2539–50.
27. VinereanuD, FlorescuN, SculthorpeN, et al. Differentiation between pathologic and physiologic left ventricular hypertrophy by tissue Doppler assessment of long-axis function in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or systemic hypertension and in athletes. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88: 53–8.
28. YangH, SunJP, LeverHM, et al. Use of strain imaging in detecting segmental dysfunction in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003; 16: 233–9.
29. SunJP, AbdallaIA, AsherCR, et al. Non-invasive evaluation of orthotopic heart transplant rejection by echocardiography. J Heart Lung Transplant 2005; 24: 160–5.
30. WeidemannF, KowalskiM, D’hoogeJ, BijnensB, SutherlandGR. Doppler myocardial imaging: a new tool to assess regional inhomogeneity in cardiac function. Basic Res Cardiol 2001; 96: 595–605.
31. WeidemannF, DommkeC, BijnensB, et al. Defining the transmurality of a chronic myocardial infarction by ultrasonic strain-rate imaging: implications for identifying intramural viability: an experimental study. Circulation 2003; 107: 883–8.
32. JamalF, KukulskiT, StrotmannJ, et al. Quantification of the spectrum of changes in regional myocardial function during acute ischemia in closed chest pigs: an ultrasonic strain rate and strain study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2001; 14: 874–84.
33. JamalF, SzilardM, KukulskiT, et al. Changes in systolic and postsystolic wall thickening during acute coronary occlusion and reperfusion in closed-chest pigs: Implications for the assessment of regional myocardial function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2001; 14: 691–7.
34. BijnensB, ClausP, WeidemannF, StrotmannJ, SutherlandGR. Investigating cardiac function using motion and deformation analysis in the setting of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2007; 116: 2453–64.
35. Garcia-FernándezMA, AzevedoJ, MorenoM, et al. Regional diastolic function in ischaemic heart disease using pulsed wave Doppler tissue imaging. Eur Heart J 1999; 20: 496–505.
36. UrheimS, EdvardsenT, TorpH, AngelsenB, SmisethOA. Myocardial strain by Doppler echocardiography. Validation of a new method to quantify regional myocardial function. Circulation 2000; 102: 1158–64.
37. MarciniakA, ClausP, SutherlandGR, et al. Changes in systolic left ventricular function in isolated mitral regurgitation: a strain rate imaging study. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 2627–36.
38. SerriK, ReantP, LafitteM, et al. Global and regional myocardial function quantification by two-dimensional strain: application in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47: 1175–81.
39. BansalM, ChoGY, ChanJ, et al. Feasibility and accuracy of different techniques of two-dimensional speckle based strain and validation with harmonic phase magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008; 21: 1318–25.
40. ReisnerSA, LysyanskyP, AgmonY, et al. Global longitudinal strain: a novel index of left ventricular systolic function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2004; 17: 630–3.
41. ChoiJO, ShinDH, ChoSW, et al. Effect of preload on left ventricular longitudinal strain by 2D speckle tracking. Echocardiography 2008; 25: 873–9.
42. NgAC, Tran daT, NewmanM, et al. Left ventricular longitudinal and radial synchrony and their determinants in healthy subjects. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008; 21: 1042–8.
43. KukulskiT, JamalF, HerbotsL, et al. Identification of acutely ischemic myocardium using ultrasonic strain measurements: a clinical study in patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 810–19.
44. NotomiY, LysyanskyP, SetserRM, et al. Measurement of ventricular torsion by two-dimensional ultrasound speckle tracking imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 2034–41.
45. Helle-ValleT, CrosbyJ, EdvardsenT, et al. New noninvasive method for assessment of left ventricular rotation: speckle tracking echocardiography. Circulation 2005; 112: 3149–56.
46. BansalM, LeanoRL, MarwickTH. Clinical assessment of left ventricular systolic torsion: effects of myocardial infarction and ischemia. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008; 21: 887–94.
47. ParkSJ, MiyazakiC, BruceCJ, et al. Left ventricular torsion by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in patients with diastolic dysfunction and normal ejection fraction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2008; 21: 1129–37.

References

1. NihoyannopoulosP, FoxK, FraserA, PintoF. EAE laboratory standards and accreditation. Eur J Echocardiogr 2007; 8: 80–7.
2. FoxJ, GlasK, SwaminathanM, ShernanS. The impact of intraoperative echocardiography on clinical outcomes following adult cardiac surgery. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2005; 9: 25–40.
3. PriceS, ViaG, SlothE, et al. Echocardiography practice, training and accreditation in the intensive care: document for the World Interactive Network Focused on Critical UltraSound (WINFOCUS). Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2008; 6: 49.
4. KleinAA, SnellA, NashefSAM, et al. The impact of intra-operative transoesophageal echocardiography on cardiac surgical practice. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 947–52.
5. PearlmanAS, GardinJM, MartinRP, et al. Guidelines for physician training in transesophageal echocardiography: recommendations of the ASE Committee for Physician Training in Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1992; 5: 187–94.
6. KneeshawJD. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) in the operating room. Br J Anaesth 2006; 97: 77–84.
7. SavageR, HillelZ, LondonM, et al. Recommendations for a standardized report for adult perioperative echocardiography from the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists/ American Society of Echocardiography Task Force for Standardized Perioperative Echocardiography Report. www.scahq.org/sca3/Report_of_Task_Force.pdf (accessed September 2009).
8. PybusDA. A perioperative echocardiographic reporting and recording system. Anesth Analg 2004; 99: 1326–9.