1. , , , et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: the Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 230–68.
2. , , . Surgical anatomy of the heart: correlation with echocardiographic imaging planes In: , , eds., Comprehensive Textbook of Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005: 65–79.
3. , . Role of sinus wall compliance in aortic leaflet function. Am J Cardiol 1999; 84: 944–6.
4. , , . Further insights into normal aortic valve function: role of a compliant aortic root on leaflet opening and valve orifice area. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77: 844–51.
5. , , , , . What is the role of the aorta in directing coronary blood flow?Heart 2008; 94: 1545–7.
6. , , , et al. ASE/SCA guidelines for performing a comprehensive intraoperative multiplane transesophageal echocardiography examination: recommendations of the ASE Council for intraoperative echocardiography and the SCA Task Force for certification in perioperative transesophageal echocardiography. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 870–84.
7. , , , . Prevalence of aortic abnormalities in the elderly: an echocardiographic study of a random population sample. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21: 1220–5.
8. , . Aortic sclerosis: not an innocent murmur but a marker of increased cardiovascular risk. Heart 2005; 91: 1389–93.
9. . Aortic stenosis. BMJ 2005; 330: 801–2.
10. , , , et al. The risk of development of aortic stenosis in patients with “benign” aortic valve thickening. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162: 2345–7.
11. . Mechanisms of aortic valve calcification. Am J Cardiol 2004; 94: 1396–402.
12. , , , et al. Effect of hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors on the progression of calcific aortic stenosis. Circulation 2001; 104: 2205–9.
13. , , , et al. Statins but not angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors delay progression of aortic stenosis. Circulation 2004; 110: 1291–5.
14. , . Targeted therapy to prevent progression of calcific aortic stenosis. Circulation 2004; 110: 1180–2.
15. , , , et al. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor use is associated with a decreased rate of aortic valve calcium accumulation. Circulation 2002; 106 (suppl II): 640 (abstract).
16. . The congenitally bicuspid aortic valve: a study of 85 autopsy cases. Am J Cardiol 1970; 26: 72–83.
17. , , , , . Bicuspid aortic valve is heritable. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 138–43.
18. , , , . Familial congenital bicuspid aortic valve: a disorder of uncertain inheritance. Am J Med Genet 1996; 62: 336–8.
19. , , . A prospective study to assess the frequency of familial clustering of congenital bicuspid aortic valve. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30: 1809–12.
20. , , , et al. Bicuspid aortic valves in hearts with other congenital heart disease. J Heart Valve Dis 1995; 4: 581–90.
21. , , , et al. The bicuspid aortic valve: an integrated phenotypic classification of leaflet morphology and aortic root shape. Heart 2008; 94: 1634–8.
22. . Bicuspid aortic valve and coarctation: two villains part of a diffuse problem. Heart 2003; 89: 965–6.
23. . The quadricuspid aortic valve: a comprehensive review. J Heart Valve Dis 2004; 13: 534–7.
24. , . Aortic stenosis. Circulation 1968; 38 (Suppl 5): 61–7.
25. , , , . Natural history of candidates for balloon valvuloplasty. Mayo Clin Proc 1987; 62: 986–91.
26. , , , et al. Prospective study of asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis: clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise predictors of outcome. Circulation 1997; 95: 2262–70.
27. . Valvular heart disease: putting guidelines into practice. BMJ 1997; 314: 1428–9.
28. , . Valvular heart disease. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 32–41.
29. . Evaluation and management of patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation 2002; 105: 1746–50.
30. , , , et al. Survival after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis with low transvalvular gradients and severe left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 1356–63.
31. , , , et al. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009; 10: 1–25.
32. , , . Planimetry of orifice area in aortic stenosis using multiplane transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 529–34.
33. , , , et al. Live three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography: initial experience using the fully-sampled matrix array probe. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 446–49.
34. , , , et al. Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. A Report of the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2008; 118: e523–661.
35. , , , et al. Effect of Doppler echocardiography on utilization of hemodynamic cardiac catheterization in the preoperative evaluation of aortic stenosis. Mayo Clin Proc 1996; 71: 141–9.
36. , , , et al. Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients. Circulation 1985; 71: 1162–9.
37. , , . Non-invasive assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Br Heart J 1980; 43: 284–92.
38. , , , . Importance of pressure recovery for the assessment of aortic stenosis by doppler ultrasound: role of aortic size, aortic valve area, and direction of the stenotic jet in vitro. Circulation 1996; 94: 1934–40.
39. , , , , . Important pressure recovery in patients with aortic stenosis and high Doppler gradients. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88: 139–44.
40. , , , , . “Overestimation” of catheter gradients by Doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33: 1655–61.
41. , , , , . Phantom aortic valve pressure gradient: discrepancies between cardiac catheterization and Doppler echocardiography. Anesth Analg 2005; 100: 1259–62.
42. . Is pressure recovery an important cause of “Doppler aortic stenosis” with no gradient at catheterisation?Heart 1996; 76: 381–3.
43. , , , et al. Prediction of the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler aortic valve area determination: prospective Doppler–catheterization correlation in 100 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 11: 1227–34.
44. , , , et al. An evaluation of prosthetic aortic valves using transesophageal echocardiography: the double-envelope technique. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 509–16.
45. , , , . Is aortic valve resistance more clinically meaningful than valve area in aortic stenosis?Heart 1999; 82: 9–10.
46. , , , . Percentage of left ventricular stroke work loss: a simple haemodynamic concept for estimation of severity in valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation 1967; 35: 868–79.
47. , , , , . Assessment of aortic valve stenosis severity: a new index based on the energy loss concept. Circulation 2000; 101: 765–71.
48. . Assessment of the aortic valve. In: , , eds., Comprehensive Textbook of Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005: 205–18.
49. . Is it ever too late to operate on the patient with valvular heart disease?J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 376–83.
50. , . Assessment and management of low-gradient, low ejection fraction aortic stenosis. Heart 2008; 94: 1526–7.
51. , , , et al. Low-gradient aortic stenosis: operative risk stratification and predictors for long-term outcome: a multicenter study using dobutamine stress hemodynamics. Circulation 2003; 108: 319–24.
52. , , , et al. Aortic valve replacement for low-flow/low-gradient aortic stenosis operative risk stratification and long-term outcome: a European multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51: 466–72.
53. , , , et al. Myocardial blood flow in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: differences between true and pseudo-severe aortic stenosis. Results from the multicentre TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo-severe Aortic Stenosis) study. Heart 2008; 94: 1627–33.
54. , , , et al. Percutaneous and minimally invasive valve procedures: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Functional Genomics and Translational Biology Interdisciplinary Working Group, and Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. Circulation 2008; 117: 1750–67.
55. . Can high blood pressure mask severe aortic stenosis?J Heart Valve Dis 1998; 7: 277–8.
56. . The effects of hypertension on aortic valve stenosis. Heart 2005; 91: 280–2.
57. , , . Impact of blood pressure on the Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of aortic stenosis. Heart 2007; 93: 848–55.
58. , . Assessment of aortic valve severity: check the valve but don’t forget the arteries!Heart 2007; 93: 780–2.
59. , . Aortic regurgitation. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1539–46.
60. , . Novel approaches to cardiac valve repair: from structure to function: part II. Circulation 2004; 109: 1064–72.
61. , , , . Transesophageal echocardiographic description of the mechanisms of aortic regurgitation in acute type A aortic dissection: implications for aortic valve repair. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 884–90.
62. , , , et al. Yearly rupture or dissection rates for thoracic aortic aneurysms: simple prediction based on size. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 17–28.
63. , , , . Impact of preoperative aortic cusp prolapse on long-term outcome after closure of subarterial ventricular septal defect. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 622–7.
64. . Doppler and echocardiogaphic characteristics of patients having an Austin Flint murmur. Circulation 1991; 83: 1940–50.
65. , . Valvular heart disease: aortic regurgitation. Circulation 2005; 112: 125–34.
66. , , . Echocardiographic evidence for valvular abnormalities. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2003; 17: 549–51.
67. , , , et al. Genesis of the Austin–Flint murmur: relation to mitral inflow and aortic regurgitant flow dynamics. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21: 1399–405.
68. , , , et al. Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003; 16: 777–802.
69. , , . Value and limitations of proximal jet dimensions for the quantitation of valvular regurgitation: an in vitro study using Doppler flow imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1991; 4: 57–66.
70. , , , , . Assessment of severity of aortic regurgitation using the width of the vena contracta: a clinical Doppler imaging study. Circulation 2000; 102: 558–64.
71. , , , . Effective regurgitant orifice area: a noninvasive Doppler development of an old hemodynamic concept. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23: 443–51.
72. , , , , . Assessment of aortic regurgitation by transesophageal color doppler imaging of the vena contracta: validation against an intraoperative aortic flow probe. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1450–5.
73. , , , , . Evaluation of aortic insufficiency by Doppler color flow mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 9: 952–9.
74. , , , et al. Quantifying aortic regurgitation by using the color Doppler-imaged vena contracta: a chronic animal model study. Circulation 1997; 96: 2009–15.
75. , , , , . Flow reversal in the descending aorta: a guide to intraoperative assessment of aortic regurgitation with transesophageal echocardiography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994; 108: 576–82.
76. , , , et al. Application of the proximal flow convergence method to calculate the effective orifice area in aortic regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 1032–9.
77. , , , et al. A new method for quantitation of mitral regurgitation based on color flow Doppler imaging of flow convergence proximal to regurgitant orifice. Circulation 1991; 84: 1481–9.
78. , , , . Serial long-term assessment of the natural history of asymptomatic patients with chronic aortic regurgitation and normal left ventricle systolic function. Circulation 1991; 84: 1625–35.
79. , , , et al. Aortic regurgitation complicated by extreme left ventricular dilation: long-term outcome after surgical correction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27: 670–7.
80. , , , et al. Outcomes after aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic regurgitation and markedly reduced left ventricular function. Circulation 2002; 106: 2687–93.
81. , , , et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation 2006; 114: e84–231.