Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:57:42.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

23 - Benign esophageal disease

from Section VII - Disorders of the esophagus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Donn H. Spight
Affiliation:
Oregon Health Sciences University
Mithran S. Sukumar
Affiliation:
Oregon Health Sciences University
Marco Scarci
Affiliation:
University College London Hospital
Aman Coonar
Affiliation:
Papworth Hospital
Tom Routledge
Affiliation:
Guy’s Hospital
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Benign esophageal disease is widely prevalent and often requires treatment, although the surgical management of the same is less commonly indicated. Surgical treatment of these diseases requires considerable expertise and is best left to those who manage these patients on a daily basis. However, a basic understanding of the diseases and their management is required by all cardiothoracic trainees and practicing thoracic surgeons, and this chapter is an attempt to enable them to do so.

Antireflux surgery

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a very common problem estimated to affect up to 35% of Americans; however, the true prevalence is unknown due to the widespread availability of over-the-counter medications that are able to lessen symptoms without any physician contact. Additionally, lack of consensus on the true constellation of symptoms that constitute the disease makes clinical diagnosis and therapeutic management a challenge. Typical GERD presents with classic symptoms of heartburn or acid regurgitation or both. A broad array of atypical symptoms can also be attributed to GERD, such as vomiting, dysphagia, chest pain, cough, asthma, sore throat, hoarseness, chronic aspiration, or idiopathic pneumonias.

Basic physiology

Heartburn is generally defined as substernal burning or discomfort that radiates upward from the epigastrium. Failure of the zone of high pressure located at the gastroesophageal (GE) junction is the most common etiology of GERD. This area, known as the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), is responsible for preventing retrograde flow of gastric material into the esophageal body. The LES is a region of thickening made up of the collar-sling musculature and clasp fibers of the upper stomach that remain in tonic opposition. Receptive relaxation triggered by the act of swallowing allows passage of a bolus into the stomach. The characteristics that maintain competency of the LES are its resting pressure, the overall length, and the intra-abdominal length subject to positive abdominal pressure. Physiologic or pathologic processes that affect these characteristics often result in GERD.

Median normal manometric values of the LES:

  1. Pressure (mmHg): 13

  2. Overall length (cm): 3.6

  3. Abdominal length (cm): 2

Indications for surgery

A careful assessment of the patient's symptoms is essential before any therapeutic intervention should be undertaken. Many GERD-like symptoms may be associated with other disease processes and will not be relieved by operative intervention.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Finks, JF, Wei, Y, Birkmeyer, JD. The rise and fall of antireflux surgery in the United States. Surg Endosc 2006; 20:1698–701.Google Scholar
2 Kahrilas, PJ, Shaheen, NJ, Vaezi, MF, et al. American Gastroenterological Association. American Gastroenterological Association Medical Position Statement on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology 2008; 135:1383–91.Google Scholar
3 Morgenthal, CB, Shane, MD, Stival, A, et al. The durability of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: 11-year outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 2007 Jun; 11(6):693–700.Google Scholar
4 Terry, ML, Vernon, A, Hunter, JG. Stapled wedge Collis gastroplasty for the shortened esophagus. Am J Surg 2004 Aug; 188(2):195–9.Google Scholar
5 Oelschlager, BK, Ma, KC, Soares, RV, et al. A broad assessment of clinical outcomes after laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Ann Surg 2012 Jul; 256(1):87–94.Google Scholar
6 Bajbouj, M, Becker, V, Phillip, V, et al. High-dose esomeprazole for treatment of symptomatic refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: a prospective pH-metry/impedance-controlled study. Digestion 2009; 80:112–18. doi:10.1159/000221146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Stefanidis, D, Hope, WW, Kohn, GP, et al. The SAGES Guidelines Committee. Guidelines for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc 2010; 24:2647–69. doi 10.1007/s00464-010-1267-8Google Scholar
1 Cabral, C, Chirica, M, Chaisemartin, C de, et al. Caustic injuries of the upper digestive tract: a population observational study. Surg Endosc 2012 Jan; 26(1):214–21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011–1857-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Atiq, M, Kibria, RE, Dang, S, et al. Corrosive injury to the GI tract in adults: a practical approach. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009 Dec; 3(6):701–9. doi: 10.1586/egh.09.56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Tohda, G, Sugawa, C, Gayer, C, et al. Clinical evaluation and management of caustic injury in the upper gastrointestinal tract in 95 adult patients in an urban medical center. Surg Endosc 2008 Apr; 22(4):1119–25.Google Scholar
4 Cheng, HT, Cheng, CL, Lin, CH, et al. Caustic ingestion in adults: the role of endoscopic classification in predicting outcome. BMC Gastroenterol 2008; 8:31.Google Scholar
5 Corrosive injury, Chapter 36, p. 515. in Pearson, et al., Esophageal Surgery, ., Churchill Livingstone, 2002.
1 Oelschlager, BK, Petersen, RP, Brunt, LM, et al. Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: defining long term clinical and anatomic outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 2012 Mar; 16(3):453–9.Google Scholar
2 Oelschlager, BK, Pellegrini, CA, Hunter, JG, et al. Biologic prosthesis to prevent recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia: long-term follow-up from a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. J Am Coll Surg 2011 Oct; 213(4):461–8.Google Scholar
3 Mattar, SG, Bowers, SP, Galloway, KD, et al. Long-term outcome of laparoscpic repair of paraesophageal hernia. Surg Endosc 2002 May; 16(5):745–9.Google Scholar
4 Soper, NJ, Swanstrom, LL, Eubanks, WS. Mastery of Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Surgery, . Lippincott William and Wilkins, 2005.
1 Payne, WS. The treatment of pharyngoesophageal diverticulum: the simple and complex. Hepatogastroenterology 1992; 39(2):109.Google Scholar
2 Chang, CY, Payyapilli, RJ, Scher, RL. Endoscopic staple diverticulostomy for Zenker's diverticulum: review of literature and experience in 159 consecutive cases. Laryngoscope 2003; 113(6):957.Google Scholar
3 Zaninotto, G, Portale, G, Costantini, M, et al. Therapeutic strategies for epiphrenic diverticula: systematic review. World J Surg 2011 Jul; 35(7):1447–53. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011–1065-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Kilic, A, Schuchert, MJ, Awais, O, et al. Surgical management of epiphrenic diverticula in the minimally invasive era. JSLS 2009 Apr–Jun; 13(2):160–4. Review.Google Scholar
5 Hudspeth, DA, Thorne, MT, Conroy, R, Pennell, TC. Management of epiphrenic esophageal diverticula: a fifteen-year experience. Am Surg 1993 Jan; 59(1):40–2.Google Scholar
6 Esophageal diverticula, Chapter 31, p. 515 in Pearson, et al., Esophageal Surgery, . Churchill Livingstone, 2002.
1 Richter, JE. Oesophageal motility disorders. Lancet 2001 Sep 8; 358(9284):823–8.Google Scholar
2 Herbella, FA, Tineli, AC, Wilson, JL Jr, Grande, JC Del. Surgical treatment of primary esophageal motility disorders. J Gastrointest Surg 2008 Mar; 12(3):604–8.Google Scholar
3 Patti, MG, Gorodner, MV, Galvani, C, et al. Spectrum of esophageal motility disorders: implications for diagnosis and treatment. Arch Surg 2005 May; 140(5):442–8; discussion 448–9.Google Scholar
4 Primary esophageal motor disorders, Chapter 32, p. 515 in Pearson, et al., Esophageal Surgery, Churchill Livingstone, 2002.
5 Achalasia: thoracoscopic and laparoscopic myotomy, Chapter 35, p. 569 in Pearson, et al., Esophageal Surgery, Churchill Livingstone, 2002.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×