Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2015
  • Online publication date: December 2015

10 - Regional analgesia techniques for labour

from Section 3 - Provision of anaesthesia
American Society of Anaesthetists Task Force on Obstetric Anaesthesia. (2007). Practice guidelines for obstetric anaesthesia: an updated report by the American Society of Anaesthetists Task Force on Obstetric Anaesthesia. Anesthesiology, 106, 843–863.
Bucklin, B. A., Hawkins, J. L., Anderson, J. R. and Ullrich, F. A. (2005). Obstetric anaesthesia workforce survey: twenty-year update. Anesthesiology, 103, 645–653.
Cappiello, E., O'Rourke, N., Segal, S. and Tsen, L. C. (2008). A randomized trial of dural puncture epidural technique compared with the standard epidural technique for labour analgesia. Anesth. Analg., 107(5), 1646–1651.
Leo, S., Ocampo, C. E., Lim, Y. and Sia, A. T. (2010). A randomized comparison of automated intermittent mandatory boluses with a basal infusion in combination with patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labour and delivery. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth., 19, 357–364.
Loubert, C., Hinova, A. and Fernando, R. (2011). Update on modern neuraxial analgesia in labour: a review of the literature of the last 5 years. Anaesthesia, 66, 192–212.
Mercier, F. J. (2011). Fluid loading for caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia: have we studied all the options? Anesth. Analg., 113(4), 677–680.
Ngan Kee, W. D. (2010). Prevention of maternal hypotension after regional anaesthesia for caesarean section. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol., 23, 304–309.
Simmons, S. W., Taghizadeh, N., Dennis, A. T. and Cyna, A. M. (2012). Combined spinal-epidural versus epidural analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 10, Art. No.: CD003401.
Halpern, S. H. and Abdallah, F. W. (2010). Effect of labor analgesia on labor outcome. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol., 23, 317–322.
Wong, C. A., Scavone, B. M., Peaceman, A. M. et al. (2005). The risk of caesarean delivery with neuraxial analgesia given early versus late in labour. N. Engl. J. Med., 52, 655–665.