Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:58:56.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter Nine - The rise and fall of trade and monetary legal orders: From the interwar period to today's global imbalances

from Part Three - Structuring fields: Market dominance, complementarity and differentiation in complex institutional ecologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2016

By
Gregory Shaffer  and
Michael Waibel
Edited by
Grégoire Mallard  and
Jérôme Sgard
Grégoire Mallard
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva
Jérôme Sgard
Affiliation:
Sciences Po, Paris
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Contractual Knowledge
One Hundred Years of Legal Experimentation in Global Markets
 , pp. 289 - 323
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Kenneth W., Snidal, Duncan. 2000, “Hard Law and Soft Law in International Governance.” International Organization. 54 (3): 421–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdelal, R. 2007, Capital Rules: The Construction of Global Finance, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Ahamed, L. 2009, Lords of Finance: The Bankers who Broke the World, William Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, J. 1998, “The Capital Myth: The Difference between Trade in Widgets and Dollars.” Foreign Affairs, May/June, pp. 7–12.Google Scholar
Blustein, P. 2012, “A Flop and a Debacle: Inside the IMF's Global Rebalancing Acts,” in CIGI Papers No. 4, Centre for International Governance Innovation, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Boughton, J.M. 2004, “The IMF and the Force of History: Ten Events and Ten Ideas That Have Shaped the Institution,” Working Paper WP/04/75, International Monetary Fund, Washington DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brummer, C. 2012, Soft Law and the Global Financial System: Rule Making in the 21st Century, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; New York, NY.Google Scholar
Chwieroth, J. 2010, Capital Ideas: The IMF and the Rise of Financial Liberalization, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Clavin, P. 2013, Securing the World Economy: The Reinvention of the League of Nations, 1920–1946, Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, R.N. 1967, “National Economic Policy in an Interdependent World Economy.” Yale Law Journal, vol. 76, no. 2: 1273–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Convention for the Abolition of Import and Export Prohibitions and Restrictions, 1928, signed at Geneva on Nov 8, 1927, 25 AJIL (1931), 9 League of Nations O. J. 728.Google Scholar
Czechoslovakia-United States Trade Agreement 1938, 200 LNTS 87.Google Scholar
Desierto, D.A. 2012, “Investment Treaties: ASEAN” in Gochoco-Bautista, M. Socorro (ed.) Asia Rising Growth and Resilience in an Uncertain Global Economy, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham/Northampton, MA, 184–212.Google Scholar
Dubin, M. 1983, “Transgovernmental Process in the League of Nations.” International Organization, vol. 37: 469–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ecuador-United States Trade Agreement 1938, 193 LNTS 85.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, B. 2008, Globalizing Capital: A History of the International Monetary System, 2nd edn, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichengreen, B. 2011, “Why the Dollar's Reign is Near an End,” Wall Street Journal, www.wsj.com/articles/SB1000142405274870331330457613217018101324.Google Scholar
Einzig, P. 1934, Exchange Control, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Estevadeordal, A., Frantz, B. and Taylor, A.M. 2003, “The Rise and Fall of World Trade, 1870–1939,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 118, no. 2: 359–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlay, R. and O'Rourke, K.H. 2007, Power and Plenty: Trade, War, and the World Economy in the Second Millennium, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, S. 1998, Should the IMF Pursue Capital-Account Convertibility? International Finance Section Department of Economics, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Gardner, R.N. 1985, “Sterling-Dollar Diplomacy in Current Perspective,” International Affairs, vol. 62: 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausfuhr, Gesetz über Verbot der und von Gold, Durchfuhr, 13 November 1915, RGBl 1915, 763 (Germany).Google Scholar
Greece-United States Trade Agreement 1938, 195 LNTS 145.Google Scholar
Gold, J. and International Monetary Fund 1990, Legal Effects of Fluctuating Exchange Rates, International Monetary Fund, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Gold, J. 1983, “Strengthening the Soft International Law of Exchange Rates,” American Journal of International Law, vol. 77: 443–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, M. 2006, “Currency Manipulation and Enforcing the Rules of International Monetary System” in Truman, E. (ed.) Reforming the IMF for the 21st Century, Institute of International Economics, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Hahn, H.J. 1990, Währungsrecht, Beck, Munich.Google Scholar
Halliday, T. and Shaffer, G. 2015, Transnational Legal Orders, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harpaz, M.D. 2010, “Sense and Sensibilities of China and WTO Dispute Settlement.” Journal of World Trade, vol. 44: 1155–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C. and , Ji W. 2012. “Understanding China's Recent Active Moves on WTO Litigation: Rising Legalism and/or Reluctant Response?” Journal of World Trade, vol. 46: 1281–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IMF Executive Board Decision No. 5392-(77/63) 29 April 1977.Google Scholar
Irwin, D.A. 2011, Peddling Protectionism: Smoot-Hawley and the Great Depression, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Irwin, D.A. 2012, Trade Policy Disaster: Lessons from the 1930s, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
James, H. 2011, The End of Globalization: Lessons from the Great Depression, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Kaplan, E. and Rodrik, D. 2001, ‘Did the Malaysian Capital Controls Work?’, National Bureau of Economic Research NBER Working Paper No. 8142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindleberger, C.P. 1981. “Dominance and Leadership in the International Economy: Exploitation, Public Goods, and Free Rides,” International Studies Quarterly, vol. 25: 242–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindleberger, C.P. 1989, Manias, Panics, and Crashes: A History of Financial Crises, 2nd edn, Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lastra, R.M. 2006, Legal Foundations of International Monetary Stability, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Laughlin, J.L. 1927. “The Gold-Exchange Standard,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 41, no. 4: 644–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
League of Nations, 1944, International Currency Experiences: Lessons of the Inter-War Period, League of Nations: Economic, Financial and Transit Department.Google Scholar
Liberia-United States Trade Agreement, 1938, 201 LNTS 163.Google Scholar
Lipson, C. 1985, Standing Guard: Protecting Foreign Capital in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Lowenfeld, A. 2010, “The International Monetary System: A Look Back Over Seven Decades,” Journal of Economic International Law, vol. 13, no. 3: 575–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meissner, C. 2010, “Surplus Reversals in Large Nations: The Cases of France and Great Britain in the Interwar Period” in Claessens, S, Evenett, S and Hoekman, B (eds.), Rebalancing the Global Economy: A Primer for Policymaking, Centre for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar
Mitchener, K.J. and Wandschneider, K. 2013, “Capital Controls and Recovery from the Financial Crisis of the 1930s,” Centre for Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy, University of Warwick, No 132.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, A. 1939, Money in the Law, Foundation Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Pehle, J.W. 1946, “The Bretton Woods Institutions,” Yale Law Journal, vol. 55: 1127–1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, J.G. 1982, “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order,” International Organization, vol. 36 no. 2: 379–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, G. and Waibel, M. 2015, “The (Mis)Alignment of the Trade and Monetary Legal Orders” in Halliday, T. and Shaffer, G. (eds.), Transnational Legal Orders, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Shuster, M.R. 1973, The Public International Law of Money, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Smoot Hawley Tarrif Act, Pub. L. 71–361, June 17, 1930 46 Stat. 590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiermann, O. 2005, International Legal Argument in the Permanent Court of International Justice: The Rise of the International Judiciary, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; New York, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steil, B. 2013, The Battle of Bretton Woods: John Maynard Keynes, Harry Dexter White, and the Making of a New World Order, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Congress. 1922, “An Act to Create a Commission Authorized Under Certain Conditions to Refund or Convert Obligations of Foreign Governments Held by the United States of America, and for Other Purposes,” February 1922, 42 Stat. 363.Google Scholar
United States Department of State, 1933, Foreign Relations of the United States Diplomatic Paper. General Part, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington DC.Google Scholar
United States Department of State, 1948, Proceedings and Documents of the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington DC.Google Scholar
United States Tariff Commission, 1943, Foreign-Trade and Exchange Controls in Germany, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington DC.Google Scholar
United States World War Foreign Debt Commission 1927, Combined Annual Reports of the World War Foreign Debt Commission with Additional Information Regarding Foreign Debts Due the United States, United States Government Printing Office, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Vagts, D.F. 2006, “International Economic Law and the American Journal of International Law,” American Journal of International Law, vol. 100: 769–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waibel, M. 2009, “BIT by BIT – The Silent Liberalization of the Capital Account” in Binder, C; Kriebaum, U; Reinisch, A and Wittich, S (eds.), International Investment Law for the 21st Century – Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 497–518.Google Scholar
Williamson, J. 1990, “What Washington Means by Policy Reform,” in Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened? Ed. Williamson, John. Institute of International Economics, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Weiler, J. 2002, “The Rule of Lawyers and the Ethos of Diplomats: Reflections on the Internal and External Legitimacy of WTO Dispute Settlement,” American Review of International Arbitration, vol. 13: 177–196.Google Scholar
Wilson, R.R. 1960, United States Commercial Treaties and International Law, Hauser Press, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
WTO Annual Report 2013, World Trade Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
WTO, China – Measures Affecting Trading Rights and Distribution Services for Certain Publications and Audiovisual Entertainment Products, AB-2009–3.Google Scholar
Zeiler, T. 1997, “GATT Fifty Years Ago: U.S. Trade Policy and Imperial Tariff Preferences,” Business and Economic History, vol. 26: 709–17.Google Scholar
Zhang, X. and Li, X. 2014, “The Politics of Compliance with Adverse WTO Dispute Settlement Rulings in China,” Journal of Contemporary China, vol. 23: 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, C.D. 2011, “Exchange Rate Misalignment and International Law,” American Journal of International Law, vol. 105: 423–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×