Book contents
- Contested Regime Collisions
- Contested Regime Collisions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Contested collisions
- Part I Between collisions and interaction
- 1 Regime collisions from a perspective of global constitutionalism
- 2 How to avoid regime collisions
- 3 Regime-interplay management
- 4 Responsive legal pluralism
- Part II Addressing collisions
- Part III Collisions otherwise
- Index
- References
2 - How to avoid regime collisions
from Part I - Between collisions and interaction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2016
Book contents
- Contested Regime Collisions
- Contested Regime Collisions
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Contested collisions
- Part I Between collisions and interaction
- 1 Regime collisions from a perspective of global constitutionalism
- 2 How to avoid regime collisions
- 3 Regime-interplay management
- 4 Responsive legal pluralism
- Part II Addressing collisions
- Part III Collisions otherwise
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Contested Regime CollisionsNorm Fragmentation in World Society, pp. 49 - 87Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Agrawala, S., “Context and Early Origins of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,” Climatic Change, 39 (1998), pp. 605–20.Google Scholar
Alter, K. J., and Meunier, S., “The Politics of Regime Complexity,” Perspectives on Politics, 7 (2009), pp. 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, M., and Finnemore, M., Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics (Cornell University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Barnett, M. N., and Finnemore, M., “The Politics, Power and Pathologies of International Organizations,” International Organization, 53 (1999), pp. 699–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blome, K., and Markard, N., “‘Contested Collisions’: Conditions for a Successful Collision Management – The Example of Article 16 of the Rome Statute,” Leiden Journal of International Law, 29 (2016), forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolin, B., A History of the Science and Politics of Climate Change: The Role of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broude, T., “Keep Calm and Carry On: Martti Koskenniemi and the Fragmentation of International Law,” Temple International and Comparative Law Journal, 27 (2013), pp. 279–92.Google Scholar
Chayes, A., and Chayes, A., The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements (Harvard University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Crawford, J., and Nevill, P., “Relations between International Courts and Tribunals: The ‘Regime Problem’” in Young, M. (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation (Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 235–60.Google Scholar
Drake, W., and Nicolaides, K., “Ideas, Interests and Institutionalization: ‘Trade in Services’ and the Uruguay Round,” International Organization, 46 (1992), pp. 37–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunoff, J. L., “Lotus Eaters: Reflections on the Varietals Dispute, the SPS Agreement and WTO Dispute Resolution” in Berman, G. and Mavroidis, P. (eds.), Trade and Human Health and Safety (Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 153–89.Google Scholar
Dunoff, J. L., “The WTO in Transition: Of Constituents, Competence and Coherence,” George Washington International Law Review, 33 (2001), pp. 979–1013.Google Scholar
Dunoff, J. L., “The Death of the Trade Regime,” European Journal of International Law, 10 (1999), pp. 733–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunoff, J. L., and Trachtman, J. P. (eds.), Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, A., and Teubner, G., “Regime Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law,” Michigan Journal of International Law, 25 (2004), pp. 999–1046.Google Scholar
Harrison, J., Making the Law of the Sea: A Study in the Development of International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Helfer, L. R., “Regime Shifting: The TRIPs Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking,” Yale Journal of International Law, 29 (2004), pp. 1–83.Google Scholar
Hohmann, J., “Igloo as Icon: A Human Rights Approach to Climate Change for the Inuit?” Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems, 18 (2009), pp. 295–316.Google Scholar
Howse, R., “From Politics to Technocracy – and Back Again: The Fate of the Multilateral Trading Regime,” American Journal of International Law, 96 (2002), pp. 94–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenks, C. W., “The Conflict of Law-Making Treaties,” British Year Book of International Law, 30 (1953), pp. 401–53.Google Scholar
Johnson, T., Organizational Progeny: Why Governments are Losing Control over the Proliferating Structures of Global Governance (Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, T. and Urpelainen, J., “A Strategic Theory of Regime Integration and Separation,” International Organization, 66 (2012), pp. 645–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, I., “Law-Making Through the Operational Activities of International Organizations,” George Washington International Review, 40 (2008), pp. 87–122.Google Scholar
Kelly, C. R., “Institutional Alliances and Derivative Legitimacy,” Michigan Journal of International Law, 29 (2008), pp. 609–64.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D., “Challenging Expert Rule: The Politics of Global Governance,” Sydney Journal of International Law, 27 (2005), pp. 5–28.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D., The Dark Side of Virtue: Reassessing International Humanitarianism (Princeton University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O., and Victor, D., “The Regime Complex for Climate Change,” Perspectives on Politics, 9 (2011), pp. 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klabbers, J., Peters, A. and Ulfstein, G., The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koremenos, B., “Institutionalism and International Law” in Dunoff, J. and Pollack, M. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 59–82.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M., “The Politics of International Law – 20 Years Later,” European Journal of International Law, 20 (2009), pp. 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, M., and Leino, P., “Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties,” Leiden Journal International Law, 15 (2002), pp. 553–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, F., and Ruggie, J. G., “International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State,” International Organization, 40 (1986), pp. 753–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, A. T. F., “Legal Regimes and Professional Knowledges: The Internal Politics of Regime Definition” in Young, M. (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation (Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 113–35.Google Scholar
Limon, M., “Human Rights and Climate Change: Constructing a Case for Political Action,” Harvard Environmental Law Review, 33 (2009), pp. 339–476.Google Scholar
Michaels, R., and Pauwelyn, J., “Conflict of Norms or Conflict of Laws? Different Techniques in the Fragmentation of Public International Law,” Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 22 (2012), pp. 349–76.Google Scholar
Murphy, S. D., “Defragmenting International Law: The Significance of Koskenniemi’s 2006 ILC Project,” Temple International and Comparative Law Journal, 27 (2013), pp. 293–308.Google Scholar
Oberthür, S., and Gehring, T. (eds.), Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Conflict among International and EU Policies (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osofsky, H., “The Inuit Petition as a Bridge? Beyond Dialectics of Climate Change and Indigenous Peoples’ Rights,” American Indian Law Review, 31 (2006–07), pp. 675–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, J., Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raustiala, K., “Institutional Proliferation and the International Legal Order” in Dunoff, J. L. and Pollack, M. A. (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspective on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 293–320.Google Scholar
Raustiala, K., and Victor, D., “The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources,” International Organization, 15 (2004), pp. 277–309.Google Scholar
Stokke, O. S., and Coffey, C., “Institutional Interplay and Responsible Fisheries: Combating Subsidies, Developing Precaution” in Oberthür, S. and Gehring, T. (eds.), Institutional Interaction in Global Environmental Governance: Synergy and Conflict among International and EU Policies (Cambridge: MIT Press 2006), pp. 127–55.Google Scholar
Teubner, G., and Korth, P., “Two Kinds of Legal Pluralism: Collision of Transnational Regimes in the Double Fragmentation of World Society” in Young, M. (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation (Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 23–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme and World Trade Organization, Trade and Climate Change (World Trade Organization, 2009).Google Scholar
World Trade Organization and International Labour Organization, Trade and Employment: Challenges for Policy Research (International Labour Office, 2007).Google Scholar
Young, M. A. (ed.), Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation (Cambridge University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, M. A., Trading Fish, Saving Fish: The Interaction between Regimes in International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, M. A., “Protecting Endangered Marine Species: Collaboration Between the Food and Agriculture Organization and the CITES Regime,” Melbourne Journal International Law, 11 (2010), pp. 441–90.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by