Abbott, Kenneth W., Keohane, Robert O., Moravcsik, Andrew, Slaughter, Anne-Marie and Snidal, Duncan 2000, The concept of legalization, International Organization 54 (3): 401–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acharya, Amitav 2017, After liberal hegemony: The advent of a multiplex world order, Ethics and International Affairs 31 (3): 271–285.Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav 2016, Advancing Global IR: Challenges, contentions, and contributions, International Studies Review 18 (1): 4–15.Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav 2014, Global International Relations (IR) and regional worlds: A new agenda for international studies, International Studies Quarterly 58: 647–659.Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav 2004, How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism, International Organization, 58 (2): 239–275.Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav and Buzan, Barry 2010, Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav and Buzan, Barry 2007, Conclusion: On the possibility of a non-Western IR theory in Asia, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 7 (3): 427–438.Google Scholar

Ackerly, Brooke, Cabrera, Luis, Forman, Fonna, et al. 2017, Grounded normative theory. Conference paper presented at the Grounded Normative Theory Workshop at Simon Fraser University, Canada 12 April 2017.Google Scholar

Adamson, Fiona B. 2005, Global liberalism versus political Islam: Competing ideological frameworks in international politics, International Studies Review 7 (4):547–569.Google Scholar

Adler, Emanuel 2007, The spread of security communities: Communities of practice, self-restraint, and NATO’s post-Cold War transformation. European Journal of International Relations 14: 195–230.Google Scholar

Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent, eds. 2011, International Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler-Nissen, Rebecca and Kropp, Kristof 2015, A sociology of knowledge approach to European integration: Four analytical principles, Journal of European Integration, 37 (2): 155–173.Google Scholar

Adler-Nissen, Rebecca and Pouliot, Vincent 2014, Power in practice: Negotiating the international intervention in Libya, European Journal of International Relations 20 (4): 889–911.Google Scholar

Ainley, Kirsten 2015, The responsibility to protect and the International Criminal Court: Counteracting the crisis, International Affairs 91 (1): 37–54.Google Scholar

Alcoff, Linda 1988, Cultural feminism versus post-structuralism: The identity crisis in feminist theory, Signs 13 (3): 405–436.Google Scholar

Alexy, Robert 2014, Formal principles – Some replies to critics, International Journal of Constitutional Law 12 (3): 511–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderlini, Sanam Naraghi 2007, Women Building Peace: What They Do, Why It Matters, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar

Arbour, Louise 2005, On Terrorists and Torturers, Statement by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Human Rights Day, New York, 7 December 2005, at: www.un.org/en/events/humanrightsday/2005/unhchr.htm (accessed on 14 September 2017).Google Scholar

Armstrong, Kenneth A 2011, Governing Social Inclusion: Europeanization through Policy Coordination, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Arnauld, Andreas von 2008, Was war, was ist - und was sein soll. Erzählen im juristischen Diskurs, in: Klein, Christian and Martinez, Matias, eds., Wirklichkeitserzählungen: Formen und Funktionen nicht-literarischen Erzählens, Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 14–50.Google Scholar

Barnett, Michael N. 1999, Culture, strategy and foreign policy change: Israel’s road to Oslo, European Journal of International Relations 5 (1): 5–36.Google Scholar

Becker, Howard S. 2008, Tricks of the Trade: How to Think about Your Research While You’re Doing It, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Benhabib, Seyla 2007, Twilight of sovereignty or the emergence of cosmopolitan norms? Rethinking citizenship in volatile times, Citizenship Studies 11: 19–36.Google Scholar

Berman, Paul Schiff 2009, The New Legal Pluralism, Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences 5, 225–242.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Stephen 2013, Global environmental norms, in: Falkner, Robert ed., The Handbook of Global Climate and Environment Policy, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 127–145.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Stephen 2011, Legitimacy in intergovernmental and non-state global governance, Review of International Political Economy 18 (1): 17–51.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Stephen 2009, Conclusion, in Bernstein, Stephen and Coleman, William D., eds., Unsettled Legitimacy: Political Community, Power, and Authority in a Global Era, Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 317–330.Google Scholar

Biehler, Anke 2017, Das Vergewaltigungsverbot im bewaffneten Konflikt: Entwicklung, Definition und Durchsetzung, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar

Bilgin, Pinar 2010, Review Article: Looking for ‘the International’ beyond the West, Third World Quarterly 31 (5): 817–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, Cofer 2002, Testimony in the hearing before the U. S. House and Senate Intelligence Committees on Pre-9/11 Intelligence Failures, 107th Congress, available at: www.scribd.com/document/341482088/SENATE-HEARING-107TH-CONGRESS-JOINTINQUIRY-INTO-INTELLIGENCE-COMMUNITY-ACTIVITIES-BEFORE-AND-AFTER-THE-TERRORIST-ATTACKSOF-SEPTEMBER-11-2001 (accessed 24 August 2017).Google Scholar

Blaikie, Norman W. H. 2000, Designing Social Research: The Logic of Anticipation, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Blumer, Herbert 1954, What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 18, 3–10.Google Scholar

Bode, Ingvild 2017, Reflective practices at the Security Council: Children and armed conflict and the three United Nations, European Journal of International Relations, OnlineFirst, 1–26 doi.org/10.1177/1354066117714529 (accessed on 22 September 2017).Google Scholar

Bogdandy, Armin von 2017, Was ist Europarecht? Juristenzeitung 72 (12): 589–640.Google Scholar

Bogdandy, Armin von and Bast, Jürgen, eds. 2004, Constitutional Principles of EU Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Bogdandy, Armin von and Venzke, Ingo 2010, Zur Herrschaft internationaler Gerichte: Eine Untersuchung internationaler öffentlicher Gewalt und ihrer demokratischen Rechtfertigung. Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 70 (1): 1–49.Google Scholar

Bowen, Glenn A. 2006, Grounded Theory and Sensitizing Concepts, International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5 (3): 1–9.Google Scholar

Brincat, Shannon 2017, Cosmopolitan recognition: Three vignettes, International Theory 9 (1): 1–32.Google Scholar

Brown, Chris 1997, Universal human rights: A critique, The International Journal of Human Rights 1(2): 41–65.Google Scholar

Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J. 2017, Norm Robustness and Contestation in International Law: Self-Defence against Non-State Actors, Paper prepared for the Norm Robustness and Contestation interdisciplinary project convened by Nicole Deitelhoff and Lisbet Zimmermann, Available at SSRN: ssrn.com/abstract=2985655 or dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2985655.Google Scholar

Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J. 2012, Interactional international law and the practice of legality, in: Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent, eds., International Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 108–135.Google Scholar

Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J. 2011a, Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brunnée, Jutta and Toope, Stephen J. 2011b, Introduction, in: Brunnée, Jutta and Toope, Stephen J., eds., Legitimacy and Legality in International Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–19.Google Scholar

Brunnée, Jutta and Toope, Stephen J. 2010, The responsibility to protect and the use of force: Building legality? Global Responsibility to Protect 2 (3): 191–212.Google Scholar

Bueger, Christian 2017, Practices, norms, and the theory of contestation, Polity 49 (1): 126–131.Google Scholar

Bueger, Christian 2014, Pathways to practice: Praxiography and international politics, European Political Science Review 6 (3): 383–406.Google Scholar

Bueger, Christian and Gadinger, Frank 2015, The play of international practice, International Studies Quarterly 59 (3): 449–460.Google Scholar

Burgers, J. Herman and Danelius, Hans 1988, The United Nations Convention against Torture: A Handbook on the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar

Campbell, David 1993, Politics without Principles: Sovereignty, Ethics, and the Narratives of the Gulf War, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar

Celikates, Robin 2014, Civic freedom and non-institutionalized political contestation, Paper prepared for presentation at the workshop Civic Freedom in an Age of Diversity: James Tully’s Public Philosophy, Organized by the Groupe de recherche sur les sociétés plurinationales, Université de Quebec à Montréal, 24 – 26 April 2014.Google Scholar

Centre for Constitutional Rights 2005, RE: Criminal Complaint against the United States Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld et al. File No. 3 ARP 207/04–2, Centre for Constitutional Rights, New York, 27 January 2005, on file with AUTHOR.Google Scholar

Chalmers, Damian and Trotter, Sarah 2016, Fundamental rights and legal wrongs: The two sides of the same EU coin, European Law Journal 22 (1): 9–39.Google Scholar

Charlesworth, Hilary, Chinkin, Christine and Wright, Shelley 1991, Feminist approaches to international law, The American Journal of International Law 85 (4): 613–645.Google Scholar

Chayes, Abraham and Chayes, Antonia H. 1993, On compliance, International Organization 47 (2): 175–205.Google Scholar

Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2001, Why comply? Social learning and European identity change. International Organization 55 (3): 553–588.Google Scholar

Checkel, Jeffrey T. 1998, The constructivist turn in international relations theory. World Politics 50 (2): 324–348.Google Scholar

Chesterman, Simon 2008, An international rule of law? American Journal of Comparative Law, 56 (2): 331–361.Google Scholar

Chinkin, Christine 2018, The adoption of Security Council Resolution 1325, Oxford Handbook on Women, Peace and Security, Oxford: Oxford University Press, Ch. 3, 20 pp (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Chinkin, Christine 2017, Giving voice and visibility to victims of sexual violence has the potential to drive cultural change in Colombia, Women, Peace and Security, available at: eprints.lse.ac.uk/76984/1/blogs.lse.ac.uk-Giving-voice-and-visibility-to-victims-of-sexual-violence-has-the-potential-to-drive-cultural-change.pdf.Google Scholar

Chinkin, Christine 2016a, Part 1: What is the Women, Peace and Security Agenda Under International Law? Lauterpacht Lectures, 25 October 2016, available at: www.law.cam.ac.uk/press/events/2016/10/lauterpacht-lectures-2016-part-1-what-women-peace-and-security-agenda-under (accessed on 29 March 2018).Google Scholar

Chinkin, Christine 2016b, Part 2: Women and Peace, Lauterpacht Lectures, 26 October 2016, available at: www.law.cam.uk/press/events/2016/10/lauterpacht-lectures-2016-part-2-women-and-peace (accessed on 29 March 2018).Google Scholar

Chinkin, Christine 2016c, Part 3: Women and Security, Lauterpacht Lectures, 27 October 2016, available at: www.law.cam.uk/press/events/2016/10/lauterpacht-lectures-2016-part-3-women-and-security (accessed on 29 March 2018).Google Scholar

Choukrie-Fishere, Ezzedine 2013, The Arab Spring: Egypt’s New Majority, Lecture at the University of Hamburg, 19 June 2013.Google Scholar

Clark, Anne-Marie, Friedman, Elisabeth J. and Hochstetler, Kathryn 1998, The sovereign limits of global civil society: A comparison of NGO participation in UN world conferences on the environment, human rights, and women, World Politics 51 (1): 1–35.Google Scholar

Cohen, Jean L. 2012, Globalization and Sovereignty: Rethinking Legality, Legitimacy, and Constitutionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, Jean L. 2010, Sovereignty in the context of globalization: A constitutional pluralist perspective, in: Besson, Samantha and Tasoulias, John, eds., The Philosophy of International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 261–280.Google Scholar

Cohen, Jean L. 2004, Whose sovereignty? Empire versus international law, Ethics & International Affairs 18 (3) 1–24.Google Scholar

Cohen, Leonard 1992, Anthem, Lyrics available at: www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/leonardcohen/anthem.html (accessed on 14 September 2017).Google Scholar

Copelon, Rhonda 2003, Rape and gender violence: From impunity to accountability in international law, Human Rights Dialogue 2 (10): 21–22, available at: www.carnegiecouncil.org/publications/archive/dialogue/2_10/index/_res/id=Attachments/index=0/HRD_Violence_against_Women.pdf.Google Scholar

Coulthard, Glen Sean 2004, Culture, consent, and the State in the struggles of indigenous peoples for recognition and self-determination: Social constructivism and the politics of critique. Consortium on Democratic Constitutionalism (DEMCON) Conference Consent as the Foundation for Political Community, University of Victoria, BC, 1–3 October 2004.Google Scholar

Council of the European Union 2006, Council Conclusions on the implementation of the EU policy on human rights and democratisation in third countries, Doc. No: 16719/06, 13 December 2006, Brussels.Google Scholar

Cover, Robert 1983, The Supreme Court 1982 term - Foreword: Nomos and narrative. Harvard Law Review 97(4): 4–68.Google Scholar

Craig, Paul and De Búrca, Gráinne 2015, EU Law Text, Cases, and Materials, Sixth Edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cravero, Kathleen 2008, Sexual Violence Against Women and Girls in Crisis: From Advocacy to Action, Keynote address to the Women’s Foreign Policy Group, Washington, D.C., 17 July 2008.Google Scholar

Cremona, Marise 2009, EC competence, ‘smart sanctions’ and the Kadi case, in: Cremona, Marise, Francioni, Francesco and Poli, Sara, eds., Challenging the EU Counter-Terrorism Measures through the Courts, EUI Working Paper AEL 2009/10, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute, Fiesole, Academy of European Law, 71–98.Google Scholar

Cremona, Marise, Francioni, Francesco and Poli, Sara eds. 2009, Challenging the EU Counter-Terrorism Measures through the Courts, EUI Working Paper AEL 2009/10, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute, Fiesole, Academy of European Law.Google Scholar

Curtin, Deirdre 2009, Executive Power of the European Union: Law, Practices, and the Living Constitution, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

D’Amato, A 1990, It’s a bird, It’s a plane, It’s jus cogens! Connecticut Journal of International Law 6: 1–5.Google Scholar

Davies, Sara E and True, Jacqui 2017, Norm entrepreneurship in foreign policy: William Hague and the prevention of sexual violence in Conflict, Foreign Policy Analysis 13 (3): 701–721.Google Scholar

Debiel, Tobias, Finkenbusch, Peter, Sondermann, Elena and Ulbert, Cornelia, eds. 2007, Moral Agency and the Politics of Responsibility, London: Routledge, Global Cooperation Series.Google Scholar

De Búrca, Gráinne 2011, The road not taken: The EU as a global human rights actor (8 November 2010). American Journal of International Law 105 (4): 649–693.Google Scholar

De Búrca, Gráinne 2009, The EU, the European Court of Justice and the international legal order after Kadi, Harvard International Law Journal 51 (1): 1–49.Google Scholar

De Búrca, Gráinne 2008, The European Court of Justice and the international legal order after Kadi, Jean Monnet Working Paper 01/09, NYU Law School.Google Scholar

De Búrca, Gráinne and Weiler, J. H. H., eds. 2012, The Worlds of European Constitutionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Deitelhoff, Nicole 2009, The discursive process of legalization: Charting islands of persuasion in the ICC case, International Organization 63 (1): 33–65.Google Scholar

Deitelhoff, Nicole and Müller, Harald 2005, Theoretical paradise – empirically lost? Arguing with Habermas, Review of International Studies 31 (1): 167–179.Google Scholar

Deitelhoff, Nicole and Zimmermann, Lisbeth 2017, Norms under challenge. Unpacking the Dynamics of Norm Robustness, Unpublished special issue proposal, Goethe University Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Deitelhoff, Nicole and Zimmermann, Lisbeth 2016, A Phoenix Tale? An Introduction, paper presented at the workshop A Phoenix Tale? The Dynamics of Norm Robustness, Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Germany.Google Scholar

Deitelhoff, Nicole and Zimmermann, Lisbeth 2013, Things We Lost in the Fire: How Different Types of Contestation Affect the Validity of International Norms, PRIF Working Paper No. 18.Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques 1981, Positions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

De Saussure, Ferdinand 1974, Course in General Linguistics, London: Fontana.Google Scholar

De Wet, Erica 2009, Holding the United Nations Security Council accountable for human rights violations through domestic and regional courts: A case of ‘be careful what you wish for’?, in: Farrall, Jeremy and Rubenstein, Kim, eds., Sanctions, Accountability and Governance in a Globalised World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 143–168.Google Scholar

Dickinson, Laura 2003a, The relationship between hybrid courts and international courts: The case of Kosovo, New England Law Review 37 (4): 1059–1072.Google Scholar

Dickinson, Laura 2003b, The promise of hybrid courts, American Journal of International Law 97 (2): 295–310.Google Scholar

Dixon, Martin 2007, Textbook on International Law, 6th Ed., London and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dobrowolsky, Alexandra 2008, Interrogating ‘invisibilization’ and ‘instrumentalization’: Women and current citizenship trend in Canada, Citizenship Studies 12(5): 465–479.Google Scholar

Doty, Roxanne 1997, Aporia: A critical exploration of the agent-structure problematique in international relations theory, European Journal of International Relations 3 (3): 365–392.Google Scholar

Doty, Roxanne 1996, Imperial Encounters, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Draude, Anke, ed. 2017, Agency of the Governed, Special Issue Introduction, presented at the workshop The Agency of the Governed, Freie Universität Berlin, SFB700, December 2016 (forthcoming with Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal).Google Scholar

Dunoff, Jeffrey L and Trachtman, Joel P., eds. 2009, Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dunne, Tim and Wheeler, Nicholas J. 1999, Human Rights in Global Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Duvall, Raymond and Chowdhury, Arjun 2011, Practices of theory, in: Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent, eds., International Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 335–354.Google Scholar

Eckes, Christina 2008, Judicial review of European anti-terrorism measures – The Yusuf and Kadi judgments of the Court of First Instance, European Law Journal 14 (1): 74–92.Google Scholar

Elliott, J. 2005, Using Narrative in Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, London: SAGE Publishing.Google Scholar

Fasolt, Constantin 2014, Quod omnes tangit ab omnibus approbari debet: The words and the meaning, in: Fasolt, Constantin, ed., Past Sense – Studies in Medieval and Early Modern European History, 182: 222–257, doi.org/10.1163/9789004269576_006 (accessed on 22 October 2017).Google Scholar

Franzosi, Roberto 1998, Narrative analysis: Or why (and how) sociologists should be interested in narrative, Annual Review of Sociology 24(1): 517–554.Google Scholar

Epstein, Charlotte 2012, Stop telling us how to behave: Socialization or infantilization? International Studies Perspectives 13 (2): 135–145.Google Scholar

Enloe, Cynthia 2014, Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics, Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Ernst, Lisa ed. 2005, Broken Bodies, Broken Dreams: Violence Against Women Exposed, Nairobi: United Nations OCHA/IRIN, details available at: cul.worldcat.org/title/broken-bodies-broken-dreams-violence-against-women-exposed/oclc/123357434.Google Scholar

Erskine, Toni 2014, ‘Coalitions of the Willing and the Shared Responsibility to Protect, SHARES Research Paper 56, www.academia.edu/21975912/_Coalitions_of_the_Willing_and_the_Shared_Responsibility_to_Protect (accessed on 22 October 2017).Google Scholar

Erskine, Toni 2012, Whose progress, which morals? Constructivism, normative IR theory and the limits and possibilities of studying ethics in world politics, International Theory 4: 449–468.Google Scholar

European Centre for Constitutional and Human Rights 2017, Sonder Newsletter: Zehn Jahre Aktiv gegen US-Folter, Centre for Constitutional Rights and Wolfgang Kaleck / Ten years of action against US torture: ECCHR, Center for Constitutional Rights and Wolfgang Kaleck, Berlin: European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights.Google Scholar

Falkner, Robert ed. 2013, The Handbook of Global Climate and Environment Policy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Feldman, John 2017, The avoidance of monetary system conflict: A role for recognition theory in reconstituting the global monetary system, Global Constitutionalism 6 (3): 442–476.Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha 2000, Are legal norms distinctive? Journal of International Law and Politics 32 (3): 699–705.Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha 1996, Norms, culture and world politics: Insights from sociology’s institutionalism, International Organization 50 (2): 325–347.Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn 1998, International norm dynamics and political change, International Organization 52 (4): 887–917.Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha and Toope, Stephen J. 2001, Alternatives to ‘legalization’: Richer views of law and politics, International Organization 55 (3): 743–758.Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha 1996, Norms, culture and world politics: Insights from sociology’s institutionalism, International Organization 50 (2): 325–347.Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, Andreas 2005, Torture in Abu Ghraib: The complaint against Donald Rumsfeld under the German code of crimes against international law, German Law Journal, 6, 3, 689–724.Google Scholar

Flemmer, Riccarda 2015, Lecciones de los primeros procesos de la consulta previa en el sector de hidrocarburos en Perú, Iberoamericana 15 (58): 166–171.Google Scholar

Forman, Fonna and Mackie, Gerry 2013, Introduction: New frontiers in global justice, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 16 (2): 151–161.Google Scholar

Forst, Rainer 2014, Justice, Democracy and the Right to Justification. Rainer Forst in Dialogue, London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar

Forst, Rainer 2012, The Right to Justification: Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice, Flynn, Jeffrey, tr., New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Forst, Rainer 2010, The justification of human rights and the basic right to justification: A reflexive approach, Ethics, 120 (4): 711–740.Google Scholar

Francioni, Francesco 2009, Kadi and the Vicissitudes of Access to Justice, in: Cremona, Marise, Francioni, Francesco and Poli, Sara, eds., Challenging the EU Counter-terrorism Measures through the Courts, EUI Working Paper AEL 2009/10, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute, Fiesole, Academy of European Law, 19–29.Google Scholar

Franck, Thomas M 1992, The ‘Powers of Appreciation’: Who is the ultimate guardian of UN legality? The American Journal of International Law 86, (3): 519–523.Google Scholar

Frankenberg, Günter 2010, Constitutional transfer: The IKEA theory revisited, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 8 (3): 563–579.Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy and Honneth, Axel eds. 2003, Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange, London; New York, NY: Verso.Google Scholar

Freistein, Katja and Liste, Philip 2016, Introduction: Fragmented territoriality, Journal of International Relations and Development 19 (2): 193–198.Google Scholar

Fremuth, Michael and Griebel, Jörn 2007, On the Security Council as a legislator: A blessing or a curse for the international community? Nordic Journal of International Law 76: 339–361.Google Scholar

Frost, Mervyn 1998, A turn not taken: Ethics in IR at the millennium, Review of International Studies 24: 127.Google Scholar

Frost, Mervyn and Lechner, Silviya 2018, Practice Theory and International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (in press).Google Scholar

Frost, Mervyn and Lechner, Silvyia 2016, Two conceptions of international practice: Aristotelian praxis or Wittgensteinian language-games? Review of International Studies 4 (2): 334–350.Google Scholar

Fuller, Lon L. 1969, The Morality of Law, rev. edn, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Gallagher, Katherine 2009, Universal jurisdiction in practice efforts to hold Donald Rumsfeld and other high-level United States officials accountable for torture, Journal of International Criminal Justice 7: 1087–1116.Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford 1973, The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar

General Court of the European Union 2010, “The General Court annuls the regulation freezing Yassin Abdullah Kadi’s funds”, Press Release No 95/10, Luxembourg, 30 September 2010.Google Scholar

George, Nicole and Shepherd, Laura J 2016, Women, peace and security: Exploring the implementation and integration of UNSCR 1325, International Political Science Review 37 (3): 297–306.Google Scholar

Gholiagha, Sassan 2016, The Humanization of international relations – Prosecution, Protection, and Killing, Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Faculty of Business and Social Sciences, University of Hamburg.Google Scholar

Gholiagha, Sassan 2015, To prevent ‘future Kosovos and future Rwandas’: A critical constructivist view on the responsibility to protect, International Journal of Human Rights 19: 1074–1097.Google Scholar

Gholiagha, Sassan 2014, The responsibility to protect: Words, deeds, and humanitarian interventions, Journal of International Political Theory 10 (3): 361–370.Google Scholar

Gibbard, Allan 2012, The Normative Meaning Role, in: Gibbard, Alan, The Normativity of Meaning, Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online, Ch. 6, at: www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646074.001.0001/acprof-9780199646074?print (accessed on 13 September 2017).Google Scholar

Gibbs, Holly and Luczak, Alexandra 2010, (IL)LEGITIMATE SUBJECTS: A feminist discourse analysis of Canada’s response to the OECD’s Report on Early Childhood Education and Care, Paper prepared for presentation at the Canadian Political Science Association Annual Conference, Concordia University, Montreal June 1–3, 2010.Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony 1984, The Constitution of Society, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Gillespie, Alex and Cornish, Flora 2014, Sensitizing questions: A method to facilitate analyzing the meaning of an utterance, Integrated Psychological Behavior, 48: 435–452.Google Scholar

Glennon, Michael J 2005, How international rules die, Georgetown Law Journal 93 (3): 939–991.Google Scholar

Goldman, Adam and Craighill, Peyton, New poll finds majority of Americans think torture was justified after 9/11 attacks, The Washington Post, 16 December 2014.Google Scholar

Greenberg, Karen J. and Dratel, Joshua L., eds. 2005, The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Guild, Elspeth 2008, The uses and abuses of counter-terrorism policies in Europe: The case of the ‘Terrorist Lists’, Journal of Common Market Studies 46 (1): 173–193.Google Scholar

Guillaume, Xavier and Huysmans, Jef, eds. 2013, Citizenship and Security: The Constitution of Political Being, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gupta, Akhil and Ferguson, James 2002, Discipline and practice: “The Field” as site, method, and location in anthropology, in: Gupta, Akhil and Ferguson, James, eds., Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1–46.Google Scholar

Guzzini, Stefano and Leander, Anna, eds. 2006, Constructivist International Relations: Alexander Wendt and His Critics, New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen 1995, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen 1988, Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns (2 Vol), Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Kahler, Miles and Montgomery, Alexander H. 2009, Network analysis for international relations, International Organization 63: 559–592.Google Scholar

Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. and Pollack, Mark A. 2009, Mainstreaming gender in the European Union: Getting the incentives right, Comparative European Politics 7 (1): 114–138.Google Scholar

Hague, William 2008, William Wilberforce: The Life of the Great Anti-Slave Trade Campaigner, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar

Haltern, Ulrich 2003, Integration through law, in: Wiener, Antje and Diez, Thomas, eds., European Integration Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hamati-Ataya, Inanna 2014, Transcending objectivism, subjectivism, and the knowledge in-between: The subject in/of ‘strong reflexivity’, Review of International Studies 40 (1): 153–175.Google Scholar

Hansen-Magnusson, Hannes and Vetterlein, Antje 2015, Framing responsibility in world politics, Paper prepared for presentation at the Annual International Studies Association Convention, New Orleans, 18–21 February 2015.Google Scholar

Haraway, Donna 1988, Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspectives, Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599.Google Scholar

Harding, Sandra 1987, Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues, Bloomington, IN and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Harding, Sandra 1986, The instability of the analytical categories of feminist theory, Signs 11 (4): 645–664.Google Scholar

Hartsock, Nancy C 1987, The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism’, in Harding, Sandra, ed., Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 157–180.Google Scholar

Havercroft, Jonathan, 2017a, Social constructivism and international ethics, in: Robinson, Fiona, Steele, Brent and Heinze, Eric, eds., Routledge Handbook on Ethics in International Relations, London: Routledge (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Havercroft, Jonathan, ed. 2017b, Symposium on contestation and international relations, Polity 49, 1.Google Scholar

Havercroft, Jonathan, 2017c, Introduction, in: Symposium on contestation and international relations, Polity 49, 1: 100–109.Google Scholar

Havercroft, Jonathan, 2008, Sovereignty, recognition and indigenous peoples, in: Price, Richard M., ed., Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 112–137.Google Scholar

Havercroft, Jonathan and Duvall, Raymond, 2017, Challenges of agonistic constructivism for international relations, Polity 49 (1): 156–165.Google Scholar

Hernes, Helga Maria, 1987, Welfare State and Woman Power, Oslo, London: Norwegian University Press & Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Heyes, Cressida J. 2017, Practices of justification: From philosophy to pluralism, in: Karmis, Dimitrios et al., eds., Civic Freedom in an Age of Diversity: James Tully’s Public Philosophy (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Hill, Felicity, Aboitiz, Mikele and Poehlman-Doumbouya, Sara 2003, Nongovernmental organizations’ role in the buildup and implementation of Security Council Resolution 1325, Signs: Journal of Women in Cultural and Society 28 (4): 1255–1269.Google Scholar

Martínez, Hinojosa, Miguel, Luis 2008, The legislative role of the Security Council in its fight against terrorism: Legal, political and practical limits, ICLQ 57: 333–359.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Gregor 2015, R2P ten years on: Unresolved justice conflicts and contestation, Global Responsibility to Protect 7 (3–4): 275–299.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Mathew 2009, Is constructivist ethics an oxymoron? International Studies Review 11: 231–252.Google Scholar

Hofius, Maren 2017, What makes the EU cohere: Strategies for reconstructing the constitutive rules of community, Paper prepared for the Workshop ‘Identity in International Relations: Methods of Interpretation and Critique’ at SOAS, University of London, 17–18 June 2017.Google Scholar

Hofius, Maren 2016, Community at the border or the boundaries of community? The case of EU field diplomats, Review of International Studies 42 (5): 939–967.Google Scholar

Hofius, Maren, Wilkens, Jan, Hansen-Magnusson, Hannes and Gholiagha, Sassan 2014, Den Schleier lichten? Kritische Normenforschung, Freiheit und Gleichberechtigung im Kontext des‚ Arabischen Frühlings’, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 21 (2): 85–105.Google Scholar

Holzscheiter, Anna 2014, Between communicative interaction and structures of signification: Discourse theory and analysis in international relations, International Studies Perspective 15 (2): 142–162.Google Scholar

Holzscheiter, Anna 2011, Power of discourse or discourse of the powerful? The reconstruction of global childhood norms in the drafting of the UN convention on the rights of the child. Journal of Language and Politics 10 (1): 1–28.Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel 2012, Recognition between states: On the moral substrate of international relations, in: Lindemann, Thomas and Ringmar, Erik, eds., The International Politics of Recognition, Boulder, CO: Routledge, 25–38.Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel 2007, Rejoinder, in: van den Brink, Bert and Owen, David, eds., Recognition and Power: Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Social Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 348–370.Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel 2003, The point of recognition: A rejoinder to the rejoinder, in Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange, Fraser, Nancy and Honneth, Axel eds., London: Verso, 237–256.Google Scholar

Honneth, Axel 1995, The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hovell, Devika 2016, Due process in the United Nations, The American Journal of International Law 110 (1): 1–48.Google Scholar

Human Rights Watch 2014, The legal framework for universal jurisdiction in Germany, available at: www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/related_material/IJ0914German_0.pdf (accessed on 18 September 2017).Google Scholar

Human Rights Watch 2005, Getting away with torture? Command responsibility for the U.S. abuse of detainees, Human Rights Watch 17 (1), available at: www.hrw.org/report/2005/04/23/getting-away-torture/command-responsibility-us-abuse-detainees.Google Scholar

Hurd, Ian 2009, After anarchy: Legitimacy and power at the UN Security Council, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hurrell, Andrew 2016, Beyond critique: How to study global IR, International Studies Review 18 (1): 149–151.Google Scholar

Ignatieff, Michael 2017a, Human rights, global ethics, and the ordinary virtues, Ethics & International Affairs 31 (1): 3–16.Google Scholar

Ignatieff, Michael 2017b, The Ordinary Virtues: Moral Order in a Divided World, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ignatieff, Michael 2016, The crisis of universal values and the return of the sovereign, The fifth Fulbright Lecture at the University of Edinburgh, 6 June 2016.Google Scholar

Isiksel, Türküler 2010, Fundamental rights in the EU after Kadi and Al Barakaat, European Law Journal 16 (5): 551–577.Google Scholar

Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus 2011, The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and its Implications for the Study of World Politics, New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus 2006, The present as history, in Tilly, Charles and Goodin, Robert, eds, The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 490–505.Google Scholar

Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus and Nexon, Daniel H. 2013, International theory in a post-paradigmatic era: From substantive wagers to scientific ontologies, European Journal of International Relations 19 (3): 543–565.Google Scholar

Jenson, Jane and Phillip, Susan 1996, Citizenship regimes: From equity to marketisation, paper presented at the conference Social and Political Citizenship in a World of Migration, European Forum, European University Institute, Florence, 22–24 February.Google Scholar

Jeßberger, Florian 2015, Contestation ‘from below’: Strategic litigation networks and accountability for gross violations of human rights, unpublished research proposal: Project C01, Research Group ConUnbound, University of Hamburg.Google Scholar

Jeßberger, Florian and Geneuss, Julia, eds. 2015, Strategic litigation. The role of NGOs in international criminal justice, Current Events Symposium, Journal of International Criminal Justice 13 (2): 205–208.Google Scholar

Jetschke, Anja and Liese, Andrea 2013, The power of human rights a decade after, in: Risse, Thomas, Sikkink, Kathryn and Ropp, Steven, eds., The Persistent Power of Human Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 26–42.Google Scholar

Johnston, A Ian 2001, Treating international institutions as social environments, International Studies Quarterly 45 (3): 487–515.Google Scholar

Kaleck, Wolfgang 2013, Strafverfolgung nach dem Völkerstrafgesetzbuch: Ein kurzer Blick in die Zukunft – ein Kommentar zum Beitrag von Martin Böse, in: Jeßberger, Florian and Geneuss, Julia (Hrsg.), Zehn Jahre Völkerstrafgesetzbuch. Bilanz und Perspektiven eines „deutschen Völkerstrafrechts”, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 177–185.Google Scholar

Kaleck, Wolfgang 2012, Vom progressiven Gebrauch des Rechts. Strategische Klagen bei Menschenrechtsverletzungen, Juridikum 2012 (3):372–381.Google Scholar

Kaleck, Wolfgang 2009, From Pinochet to Rumsfeld: Universal jurisdiction in Europe 1998–2008, Michigan Journal of International Law 30 (9):927–980.Google Scholar

Kaleck, Wolfgang and Wiener, Antje 2007, Umstrittene Normen in der Staatengesellschaft: das deutsche Völkerstrafrecht und die Debatte um die Völkerrechtsreform, in Wolf, Klaus Dieter ed., Staat und Gesellschaft - fähig zur Reform? Baden-Baden: Nomos, 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, Immanuel 1984, Zum ewigen Frieden. Ditzingen: Reclam.Google Scholar

Karmis, Dimitri 2014, James Tully’s concept of civic freedom, Introduction prepared for presentation at the workshop Civic Freedom in an Age of Diversity: James Tully’s Public Philosophy, organized by the Groupe de recherche sur les sociétiés plurinationales, Université de Québec à Montréal, 24–26 April 2014.Google Scholar

Katzenstein, Peter J., ed. 1996, The Culture of National Security. Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Kearns, Erin M. and Young, Joseph 2014, Dramatic depictions of torture increase support for it, The Washington Post, 12 December, available at: www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/12/12/dramatic-depictions-of-torture-increase-support-for-it.Google Scholar

Keating, Vincent C. 2014, Contesting the international illegitimacy of torture: The Bush administration’s failure to legitimate its preferences within international society, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 16 (1): 1–27.Google Scholar

Keck, Margaret E. and Sikkink, Kathryn 1998, Activists Beyond Borders, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Klemperer, Victor 1957, The Language of the Third Reich: A Philologist’s Notebook (German original title: LTI: Lingua Tertii Imperii: Notizbuch eines Philologen,) Halle: Max Niemayer Verlag.Google Scholar

Klotz, Audie 1995, Norms in International Relations: The Struggle against Apartheid, Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Koh, Harold Hongju 1997, Why do nations obey international law? The Yale Law Journal 106 (8): 2599–2659.Google Scholar

Kokott, Juliane and Sobotta, Christoph 2012, The Kadi case – Constitutional core values and international law – Finding the balance? The European Journal of International Law 23 (4): 1015–1024.Google Scholar

Koopmans, Ruud 1993, The dynamics of protest waves: West Germany, 1965 to 1989, American Sociological Review 58 (5): 637–658.Google Scholar

Kornprobst, Markus and Senn, Martin 2016, Introduction: Background ideas in international relations, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18 (2): 273–281.Google Scholar

Kowert, Paul and Legro, Jeffrey 1996, Norms, identity and their limits: A theoretical reprise, in: Katzenstein, Peter J. ed., The Culture of National Security, New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 451–497.Google Scholar

Kratochwil, Friedrich 2012, Leaving sovereignty behind? An inquiry into the politics of post-modernity, in: Falk, Richard, Juergensmeyer, Mark and Popovski, Vesselin, eds., Legality and Legitimacy in Global Affairs, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 127–148.Google Scholar

Kratochwil, Friedrich 2011, Making sense of international practices, in: Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent, eds., International Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 36–60.Google Scholar

Kratochwil, Friedrich 1989, Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kratochwil, Friedrich 1984, The force of prescription, International Organization 38 (4): 685–708.Google Scholar

Kratochwil, Friedrich and Ruggie, John G 1986, The state of the art on an art of the state, International Organization 40 (4): 753–775.Google Scholar

Kriesi, Hanspeter 1991, The political opportunity structure of new social movements: Its impact on their mobilization, Discussion paper FS III 91–103, Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin.Google Scholar

Krook, Monica L and True, Jacqui 2012, Rethinking the life cycles of international norms: The United Nations and the global promotion of gender equality, European Journal of International Relations, 18 (1): 103–127.Google Scholar

Kumm, Mattias 2009, The cosmopolitan turn in constitutionalism: On the relationship between constitutionalism in and beyond the state, in: Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Trachtman, Joel P., eds., Ruling the World?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 258–325.Google Scholar

Kumm, Mattias, Havercroft, Jonathan, Dunoff, Jeffrey and Wiener, Antje 2017, The end of the ‘West’ and the future of global constitutionalism, Global Constitutionalism 6 (1): 1–15.Google Scholar

Kutz, Christopher 2014, How norms die: Torture and assassination in American security policy, Ethics and International Affairs 28: 425–449.Google Scholar

Laden, Anthony 2012, Reasoning: A Social Picture, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Laden, Anthony Simon and Owen, David, eds. 2007, Multiculturalism and Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lagerwall, Anne 2015, Jus Cogens, in: Oxford Bibliographies Online, International Law Section, available at: www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199796953/obo-9780199796953-0124.xml (accessed on 22 October 2017).Google Scholar

Lang, Anthony Jr., Rengger, Nicholas and Walker, William 2006, The role(s) of rules: Some conceptual clarifications, International Relations 20 (3): 274–294.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno 1987, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Leander, Anna 2013, Targeted killings and extrajudicial executions: Technological agency in the politics of legal expertise, Leiden Journal of International Law 26(4): 811–831.Google Scholar

Leander, Anna 2008, Thinking tools: Analyzing symbolic power and violence, in Klotz, Audie and Prakash, Deepa, eds., Qualitative methods in international relations: A pluralist guide, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 11–27.Google Scholar

Lennard, Natasha 2012, Torture grows in popularity, Salon, available at: www.salon.com/2012/10/03/torture_grows_in_popularity.Google Scholar

Lentner, Gabriel 2016, Paper prepared for presentation at the Michaelmas ‘Peregrine Talk’ series, Lauterpacht Centre for International Law, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar

Liese, Andrea 2009, Exceptional necessity: How liberal democracies contest the prohibition of torture and ill-treatment when countering terrorism, Journal of International Law and International Relations 5 (1): 17–48.Google Scholar

Lindemann, Thomas and Ringmar, Eric, eds. 2012, The International Politics of Recognition, Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar

Lister, Ruth 2003, Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Lobel, Jules 2003, Success without Victory: Lost Legal Battles and the Long Road to Justice in America, New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Locher, Birgit 2002, International norms and European policy-making: trafficking in women in the EU, CEuS Working Paper No. 2002/6.Google Scholar

Lyons, Scott 2006, German criminal complaint against Donald Rumsfeld and others, ASIL Insights 10 (33), available at: www.asil.org/insights/volume/10/issue/33/german-criminal-complaint-against-donald-rumsfeld-and-others.Google Scholar

Makowski, Kevin D. 1995, Solange III: The German Federal Constitutional Court’s decision on accession to the Maastricht Treaty on European Union, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Business Law 16 (1): 155–179.Google Scholar

March, James G and Olsen, Johan P 1989, Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics, New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar

March, James G and Olsen, Johan P 1998. The institutional dynamics of international political orders, International Organization 52 (4): 943–969.Google Scholar

Marshall, T. H. 1950, Citizenship and Social Class, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Massey, Doreen 2005, For Space, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

McCourt, David 2016, Practice theory and rationalism as the new constructivism, International Studies Quarterly, 60: 475–485.Google Scholar

McIlwain, Charles Howard 1948, Constitutionalism: Ancient and Modern, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

McKeown, Ryder 2009, Norm regress: US revisionism and the slow death of the torture norm, International Relations 23 (1): 5–25.Google Scholar

Meehan, Elisabeth 1997, Political pluralism and European citizenship, in: Lehning, Percy, ed., Citizenship, Democracy and Justice in the New Europe, London et al., Routledge, 69–85.Google Scholar

Merry, Sally Engle 2011, Measuring the world: Indicators, human rights and global governance, Current Anthropology 52 (3): 83–95.Google Scholar

Milliken, Jennifer 1999, The study of discourse in international relations: A critique of research and methods. European Journal of International Relations 5 (2): 225–254.Google Scholar

Miskimmon, Alistair, O’Loughlin, Ben and Roselle, Lynne 2017, Forging the World: Strategic Narratives and International Relations, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Müller, Harald 2013, Conclusion. Agency is central, in: Müller, Harald and Wunderlich, Carmen, eds., Norm Dynamics in Multilateral Arms Control: Interests, Conflicts, and Justice, Studies in Security and International Affairs, Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 337–365.Google Scholar

Müller, Harald and Wunderlich, Carmen, eds. 2013, Norm Dynamics in Multilateral Arms Control: Interests, Conflicts, and Justice, Studies in Security and International Affairs, Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar

Müller, Jan-Werner 2015, Should the EU protect democracy and the rule of law inside member states? European Law Journal, 21 (2): 141–160.Google Scholar

Neumann, Iver B 2012, At Home with the Diplomats: Inside a European Foreign Ministry, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Nexon, Dan 2017, Seizing constructivist ground? Practice and international relations theories, International Studies Quarterly Symposium, available at: www.isanet.org/Publications/ISQ/Posts/ID/5473/categoryId/102/Seizing-Constructivist-Ground-Practice-and-Relational-Theories (accessed 13 October 2017).Google Scholar

Niemann, Holger and Schillinger, Henrik 2016, Contestation ‘all the way down’? The grammar of contestation in norm research, Review of International Studies 43 (1): 29–49.Google Scholar

Nouwen, Sarah 2006 ‘Hybrid Courts’: The hybrid category of a new type of international crimes courts, Utrecht Law Review 2 (2): 190–214.Google Scholar

Nye, Joseph S. 2017, Will the liberal order survive? The history of an idea, Foreign Affairs 96 (1): 10–16.Google Scholar

Orakhelashvili, Alexander 2006, Peremptory Norms in International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Onuf, Nicholas G 1994, The constitution of international society, European Journal of International Law 5 (1): 1–19.Google Scholar

Open Society Justice Initiative 2013, Globalizing torture: CIA secret detention and extraordinary rendition, February 2013, available at: www.opensocietyfoundations.org/reports/globalizing-torture-cia-secret-detention-and-extraordinary-rendition (accessed on 14 September 2017).Google Scholar

Open Society Justice Initiative 2013, Foreign government participation in CIA secret rendition and extraordinary rendition, in: Open Society Justice Initiative, Globalizing Torture: CIA Secret Detention and Extraordinary Rendition, New York, NY: Open Society Foundations, 61–118, available at: www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/globalizing-torture-20120205.pdf (accessed on 14 September 2017).Google Scholar

Orford, Anne and Hoffman, Florian, eds. 2016, The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Owen, David and Tully, James 2007, Redistribution and recognition: Two approaches, in: Laden, Anthony Simon and Owen, David, eds., Multiculturalism and Political Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 265–291.Google Scholar

Park, Susan and Vetterlein, Antje, eds. 2010, Owning Development: Creating Global Policy Norms in the IMF and the World Bank, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pavioni, Riccardo 2009, Freedom to choose the legal means for implementing UN Security Council Resolutions and the ECJ Kadi Judgment: A misplaced argument hindering the enforcement of international law in the EC, in: Cremona, Marise, Francioni, Francesco and Poli, Sara, eds., Challenging the EU Counter-terrorism Measures through the Courts, EUI Working Paper AEL 2009/10, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute, Fiesole, Academy of European Law, 31–38.Google Scholar

Payne, Rodger A. 2001, Persuasion, frames and norm construction, European Journal of International Relations 7 (1): 37–61.Google Scholar

Percy, Sarah 2016, Women and war, Paper prepared for presentation at the workshop Norm Robustness, 9–10 December 2016, Goethe Universität Frankfurt/Main.Google Scholar

Pernice, Ingolf 2009, The Treaty of Lisbon: Multilevel constitutionalism in action, Columbia Journal of European Law 15 (3): 349–407.Google Scholar

Posch, Albert 2009, The Kadi Case: Rethinking the relationship between EU law and international law, The Columbia Journal of European Law Online 15: 1–5. at: web.archive.org/web/20121231151342/http://www.cjel.net/online/15_2-posch.Google Scholar

Powell, Cathleen 2011, A Fullerian analysis of Security Council legislation, International Organizations Law Review 8, 205–224.Google Scholar

Pouliot, Vincent 2017, International Pecking Orders, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pouliot, Vincent 2008, The logic of practicality: A theory of practice of security communities. International Organization 62 (2): 257–288.Google Scholar

Pouliot, Vincent and Mérand, Frédéric 2013, Bourdieu’s concepts: Political sociology in international relations, in Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, ed., Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR, London: Routledge, 24–44.Google Scholar

Price, Richard 2016, Syria and the Chemical Weapons Taboo, Contribution to the special issue by Deitelhoff, Nicole and Zimmermann, Lisbeth 2017, Norms Under Challenge: Unpacking the Dynamics of Norm Robustness. Unpublished special issue proposal, Goethe University Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Price, Richard, ed. 2008, Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Price, Richard and Sikkink, Kathryn 2017, From micro to neuro: Implications of neuroscience and moral psychology for research on international norms, Memo for ISA Workshop Taking Stock of the Past to Shape the Future of Norm Studies, Baltimore, February 21, 2017.Google Scholar

Puetter, Uwe and Wiener, Antje 2009, The quality of norms is what actors make of it: Critical constructivist research on norms, Journal of International Law and International Relations, 5 (1): 1–16.Google Scholar

Quin, Yaqing 2016, A relational theory of world politics, International Studies Review 18 (1): 33–47.Google Scholar

Shen, Qinmin 2017, Lingering issues of foreign official immunity in enforcing prohibition against torture in domestic courts: Pinochet’s reasoning reassessed, Chinese Journal of International Law 16 (2): 311–350.Google Scholar

Ralph, Jason 2018, What should be done? Pragmatic constructivist ethics and the responsibility to protect, International Organization 72 (1): 173–203.Google Scholar

Raustiala, Kal 2012, The Role of NGOs in international treaty-making, in Hollis, Duncan B., ed., The Oxford Guide to Treaties, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 150–174.Google Scholar

Rawls, John 1971, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Reckwitz, Andreas 2002a, Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing, European Journal of Social Theory 5 (2): 243–263.Google Scholar

Reckwitz, Andreas 2002b, The status of the ‘material’ in theories of culture: From ‘social structure’ to ‘artefacts’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 32 (2): 195–217.Google Scholar

Rees, Madeleine and Chinkin, Christine 2015, Why we support the PSVI. Women’s International League for Peace & Freedom (WILPF), 17 June, wilpf.org/why-we-support-the-psvi/ (accessed on 14 September 2017).Google Scholar

Reisman, Michael 1988, International incidents: Introduction to a new genre in the study of international law, in: Reisman, W. Michael and Willard, Andrew R., eds., International Incidents: The Law that Counts in World Politics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Reus-Smit, Christian 2017, Cultural diversity and international order, International Organization, 71 (4): 851–885.Google Scholar

Reus-Smith, Christian 2008, Constructivism and the structure of ethical reasoning, in: Price, Richard, ed., Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 53–82.Google Scholar

Reus-Smit, Christian 2001, Human rights and the social construction of sovereignty. Review of International Studies 27 (4): 519–538.Google Scholar

Reus-Smit, Christian 1997, The constitutional structure of international society and the nature of fundamental institutions, International Organization 51 (4): 555–589.Google Scholar

Risse, Thomas 2000, ‘Let’s argue!’: Communicative action in world politics, International Organization 54 (1): 1–39.Google Scholar

Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C. and Sikkink, Kathryn, eds., 2013, The Persistent Power of Human Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C. and Sikkink, Kathryn, eds., 1999, The Power of Human Rights. International Norms and Domestic Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Robinson, Fiona 2018, IR theory, in: Steele, Brent J. and Heinze, Eric, eds., Routledge Handbook of Ethics and International Relations, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Robinson, Fiona 2009, Bridging the real and the ideal in international ethics, International Studies Review 11 (2): 396–398.Google Scholar

Rosert, Elvira and Schirmbeck, Sonja 2007, Zur Erosion internationaler Normen. Folterverbot und nukleares Tabu in der Diskussion, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 14 (2): 253–287.Google Scholar

Rouse, John 2007, Social practices and normativity. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (1): 1–11.Google Scholar

Ruggie, John Gerard 1998, Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization, London and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ruggie, John Gerard 1992, Multilateralism: The anatomy of an institution, International Organization 46 (3): 561–98.Google Scholar

Runciman, David 2013, The Confidence Trap: A History of Democracy in Crisis from World War I to the Present, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Sabaratnam, M 2011, IR in dialogue … but can we change the subjects? A typology of decolonising strategies for the study of world politics, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 39 (3): 781–803.Google Scholar

Sandholtz, Wayne 2016, Norms don’t die, They get replaced, Paper prepared for presentation at the workshop Norm Robustness, 9–10 December 2016, Goethe Universität Frankfurt/Main.Google Scholar

Sandholtz, Wayne, and Stiles, Kendall 2009, International Norms and Cycles of Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sands, Philippe 2006, Lawless World: The Whistle-blowing Account of How Bush and Blair are Taking the Law into Their Own Hands. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Schilling, Christopher L. 2014, Emotional State Theory: Friendship and Fear in Israeli Foreign Policy, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Schilling-Vacaflor, Almut and Flemmer, Riccarda 2015, Conflict transformation through prior consultation? Journal of Latin American Studies, 47 (4): 811–839.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Averell and Sikkink, Kathryn 2016, Explaining the impact of US contestation of the Torture Ban, Contribution to the special issue by Deitelhoff, Nicole and Lisbeth Zimmermann 2017, Norms Under Challenge. Unpacking the Dynamics of Norm Robustness., Unpublished special issue proposal, Goethe University Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Schneider, Patricia and Pfeiffer, Katrin 2009, Die Terrorlistenpraxis verliert vor Gericht – Das EuGH-Urteil und seine Folgen für die gezielten Sanktionen der VN, Humanitäres Völkerrecht / Journal for International Law of Peace and Armed Conflict 22 (1): 1–14.Google Scholar

Schreck, Rachel 2009, Rhetoric without results: United Nations Security Council Resolutions concerning rape during armed conflict, Pennsylvania International Law Review 28 (1): 83–110.Google Scholar

Scott, Joan W. 1986, Gender: A useful category for historical analysis, American Historical Review, 9 (5): 1053–1075.Google Scholar

Searle, John 1995, The Construction of Social Reality. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar

Searle, John R. 1969, Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sedelmeier, Ulrich 2014, Anchoring democracy from above? The European Union and democratic backsliding in Hungary and Romania after accession, European Law Journal 52 (1): 105–121.Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya 2017, Ethics and the foundation of global justice, Ethics and International Affairs, 31 (3): 261–270.Google Scholar

Sending, Ole Jacob 2016, Agency, order, and heteronomy: Norms and practice at a critical juncture, Paper prepared for presentation at the workshop Normative Practice and New IR Theory, University of Hamburg, 17 November 2016.Google Scholar

Sending, Ole Jacob and Neumann, Iver B. 2012, Banking on power: How some practices in international relations anchor others, in: Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent, eds., International Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 231–254.Google Scholar

Sending, Ole Jacob, Pouliot, Vincent and Neumann, Iver B., eds., 2015, Diplomacy and the Making of World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Shani, Giorgio 2008, Toward a post-Western IR: The Umma, Khalsa Panth, and critical international relations theory, International Studies Review 10 (4): 722–734.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Ian 1989, Textualizing global politics, in: Der Derian, James and Shapiro, Michael J., eds., International/Intertextual Relations, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 11–22.Google Scholar

Shaw, Josephine 1997, Citizenship of the Union: Towards post-national membership? Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law 1995, Vol. VI, No. 1, The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar

Shaw, Josephine and More, Gillian, eds. 1995, The New Legal Dynamics of European Union, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Shepherd, Laura 2017, Whose international is it anyway? Women’s peace activists as international relations theorists, International Relations 31 (1): 76–80.Google Scholar

Shepherd, Laura J 2015, Constructing civil society: Gender, power and legitimacy in United Nations peacebuilding discourse, European Journal of International Relations 21 (4): 887–910.Google Scholar

Shepherd, Laura J 2013, Gender, Violence and Popular Culture: Telling Stories, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Shepherd, Laura J 2008, Power and authority in the production of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325, International Studies Quarterly 52 (2): 383–404.Google Scholar

Shepherd, Laura and True, Jacqui, 2014, The Women, Peace and Security agenda and Australian leadership in the world: From rhetoric to commitment? Australian Journal of International Affairs 68 (3): 257–284.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin 1974, ‘Social Meaning’ and the explanation of social action, Philosophy, Politics and Society, Series IV: 136–157.Google Scholar

Sikkink, Kathryn 2011, Beyond the justice cascade: How agentic constructivism could help explain change in international politics, revised Paper from a Keynote Address, Out of the Ivory Tower: Weaving the Theories and Practice of International Relations, at the Millennium Annual Conference on 22 October 2011 at London School of Economics, for presentation at the Princeton University IR Colloquium, 21 November 2011; available at: www.princeton.edu/politics/about/file-repository/public/Agentic-Constructivism-paper-sent-to-the-Princeton-IR-Colloquium.pdf (accessed on 14 September 2017).Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie 2017, The return of anarchy?, Columbia Journal of International Affairs 70 (15 March), available at: jia.sipa.columbia.edu/return-anarchy.Google Scholar

Solingen, Ethel and Börzel, Tanja A. 2014, Introduction to presidential issue. The politics of international diffusion: A symposium, International Studies Review 16 (2): 173–187.Google Scholar

Springer, Allen L. 1997, The Canadian Turbot War with Spain: Unilateral state action in defense of environmental interests, Journal of Environment & Development 6 (1): 26–60.Google Scholar

Stahlberg, Tim 2010, Case T-85/09, Kadi II, Guest post by Tim Stahlberg, Attorney at CMS Hasche Sigle, Hamburg, on 26 October 2010, available at: courtofjustice.blogspot.de/2010/10/case-t-8509-kadi-ii.html (accessed 24 August 2017).Google Scholar

Steele, Brent J. 2017, Broadening the contestation of norms in international relations, Polity 49 (1): 132–138.Google Scholar

Steele, Brent J. 2016, Organizational processes and ontological (in)security: Torture, the CIA and the United States, Cooperation and Conflict 52 (1): 69–89.Google Scholar

Steele, Brent J. 2013, The insecurity of America: The curious case of torture’s escalating popularity, in: Heinze, Eric A., ed., Justice, Sustainability, and Security: Global Ethics for the Twenty-first Century, New York, NY: Palgrave, 171–204.Google Scholar

Steele, Brent J. and Acuff, Jonathan M., eds., 2012, Theory and Application of the “Generation” in International Relations and Politics, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Steele, Brent and Heinze, Eric, eds., 2018, Routledge Handbook on Ethics and International Relations, New York, NY et al.: Routledge.Google Scholar

Janice, Stein 2011, Background knowledge in the foreground: Conversations about competent practice in ‘sacred space’, in Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent, eds., International Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 87–107.Google Scholar

Stromseth, Jane, Wippman, David and Brooks, Rosa 2006, Can Might Make Rights? Building the Rule of Law After Military Interventions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Subotić, Jelena 2016, Narrative, ontological security, and foreign policy change, Foreign Policy Analysis 12: 610–627.Google Scholar

Sundaram, Sasikumar S. 2017, Norm contestation and global governance: Taking actor configurations and practical reasoning seriously, Polity 49 (1): 139–148.Google Scholar

Tarrow, Sidney 1989, Struggle, politics, and reform: Collective action, social movements, and cycles of protest. Ithaca, NY: Center for International Studies, Cornell University.Google Scholar

Tarrow, Sydney G. and Tilly, Charles 2007, Contentious Politics, Boulder, CO: Paradigm Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles 1993, To follow a rule …, in: Calhoun, Craig, LiPuma, Edward and Postone, Moishe, eds., Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 45–60.Google Scholar

Tickner, Ann J 2011, Retelling IR’s foundational stories: Some feminist and postcolonial perspectives. Global Change, Peace & Security 23 (1): 5–13.Google Scholar

Tilly, Charles 2001, Mechanisms in political processes, Annual Review of Political Science 41 (1): 21–41.Google Scholar

Tilly, Charles 1984, Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Titscher, Stefan, Meyer, Michael, Wodak, Ruth and Vetter, Eva, (2005 [2000]) Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis, London: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar

True, Jacqui 2017, Think piece on the Women Peace and Security Agenda, presentation prepared for the workshop Dynamics of Dissent, Nuffield College, University of Oxford, 4–6 June 2017.Google Scholar

Tryggestad, Torunn L 2009, Trick or treat? The UN and implementation of Security Council Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security, Global Governance 15, 539–557.Google Scholar

Tully, James 2017, Reciprocal elucidation, in Karmis, Dimitrios et al., eds., Civic Freedom in an Age of Diversity: James Tully’s Public Philosophy, Ch. 20 (forthcoming).Google Scholar

Tully, James 2016, Deparochializing political theory and beyond: A dialogue approach to comparative political thought, Journal of World Philosophies 1 (5): 51–74.Google Scholar

Tully, James 2014, On Global Citizenship: Dialogue with James Tully, London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar

Tully, James 2012, Middle East legal and governmental pluralism: A view of the field from the demos, Middle East Law and Governance 4 (2–3): 225–263.Google Scholar

Tully, James 2011, Dialogue, Political Theory 39 (1): 145–160.Google Scholar

Tully, James 2008a, Public Philosophy in a New Key, Vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tully, James 2008b, Public Philosophy in a New Key, Vol. 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tully, James 2004, Recognition and dialogue: The emergence of a new field. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 7 (3): 84–106.Google Scholar

Tully, James 2002, The unfreedom of the moderns in comparison to their ideals of constitutional democracy, The Modern Law Review, 65 (2): 204–228.Google Scholar

Tully, James 1995, Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity, John Robert Seeley Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tully, James H 1983, The pen is a mighty sword: Quentin Skinner’s analysis of politics, British Journal of Political Science 13 (4): 489–509.Google Scholar

Tzanou, Maria 2009, Case-note on Joined Cases C-402/05 P & C-415/05 P Yassin Abdullah Kadi & Al Barakaat International Foundation v. Council of the European Union & Commission of the European Communities, German Law Journal 10 (2): 123–154.Google Scholar

Ulbert, Cornelia 2017, In search of equity: Practices of differentiation and the evolution of a geography of responsibility, in Ulbert, Cornelia, Frankenbusch, Peter, Sondermann, Elena and Debiel, Tobias, eds., Moral Agency and the Politics of Responsibility, Routledge Global Cooperation Series, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly 2015, The scope and application of the principle of universal jurisdiction (Agenda item 86), Seventieth Session, Summary of Work (2015), available at: www.un.org/en/ga/sixth/70/universal_jurisdiction.shtml (accessed on 18 September 2017).Google Scholar

United Nations General Assembly 1984, Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession General Assembly resolution 39/46 of 10 December 1984, entry into force 26 June 1987, in accordance with article 27 (1): available at: www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/cat.pdf.Google Scholar

United Nations Security Council 2004, The rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies. Report of the Secretary-General (S/2004/616).Google Scholar

Venzke, Ingo 2012, How Interpretation Makes International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Venzke, Ingo 2009, Legal contestation about ‘enemy combatants’: On the exercise of power in legal interpretation, Journal of International Law & International Relations 5 (1): 157–184.Google Scholar

Villumsen Berling, Trine and Bueger, Christian 2013, Practical reflexivity and political science: Strategies for relating scholarship and political practice, PS: Political Science and Politics, 46 (1): 115–119.Google Scholar

von Billerbeck, Sarah B. 2017, UN peace operations and conflicting legitimacies, Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 11 (3): 286–305.Google Scholar

Walker, Neil 2014, Intimations of Global Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Walker, Neil 2009, Reframing EU constitutionalism, in Dunoff, Jeffrey L. and Trachtman, Joel P., eds., Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Walker, Neil 2008, Beyond boundary disputes and basic grids: Mapping the global disorder of normative orders, International Journal of Constitutional Law 6 (3–4): 373–396.Google Scholar

Walker, Neil 2002, The idea of constitutional pluralism, The Modern Law Review 65 (3): 317–359.Google Scholar

Walker, Neil 2000, Flexibility within a metaconstitutional frame: Reflections on the future of legal authority in Europe, in: De Búrca, Gráinne and Scott, Joanne, eds., Constitutional Change in the EU: From University to Flexibility? Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 9–30.Google Scholar

Ward, Jeanne 2005, Gender-based violence conflict-affected populations: Humanitarian program responses, in: Durham, Helen and Gurd, Tracey, eds., Listening to the Silences: Women and War, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 67–87.Google Scholar

Watner, Carl 2005, Quod omnes tangit: Consent theory in the radical Libertarian tradition in the Middle Ages, Journal of Libertarian Studies 19 (2): 67–85.Google Scholar

Weber, Cynthia 1994, Good girls, little girls, and bad girls: Male paranoia in Robert Keohane’s critique of feminist international relations, Millennium 23 (2): 337–349.Google Scholar

Weber, Martin 2014, Between ‘isses’ and ‘oughts’: IR constructivism, Critical theory, and the challenge of political philosophy, European Journal of International Relations 20 (2): 516–543.Google Scholar

Weiler, Joseph H. H. and Wind, Marlene, eds. 2003, European Constitutionalism Beyond the State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Weldes, Jutta and Saco, Diana 1996, Making state action possible: The United States and the discursive construction of ‘The Cuban Problem’, 1960–1994, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 25 (2): 361–395.Google Scholar

Welsh, Jennifer 2013, Norm contestation and the responsibility to protect, Global Responsibility to Protect 5 (4): 365–396.Google Scholar

Wenger, Etienne 1998, Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wiener, Antje 2017a, A theory of contestation: A concise summary of its argument and concepts, Polity 49 (1): 109–125.Google Scholar

Wiener, Antje 2017b, A reply to my critics, Polity 49 (1): 165–184.Google Scholar

Wiener, Antje 2017c, Agency of the governed in global international relations: access to norm validation, Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal, at: www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23802014.2017.1359064?journalCode=rtwt20 (accessed on 22 October 2017).Google Scholar

Wiener, Antje 2016, Contested norms in inter-national encounters: The ‘Turbot War’ as a prelude to fairer fisheries governance, Politics and Governance, 4 (3): 20.Google Scholar

Wiener, Antje 2014, A Theory of Contestation, Heidelberg et al.: Springer.Google Scholar

Wiener, Antje 2009, Enacting meaning-in-use: Qualitative research on norms and international relations, Review of International Studies 35 (1): 175–193.Google Scholar

Wiener, Antje 2008, The Invisible Constitution of Politics: Contested Norms and International Encounters, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wiener, Antje 2007a, The dual quality of norms and governance beyond the State: Sociological and normative approaches to ‘interaction’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 10 (1): 47–69.Google Scholar

Wiener, Antje 2007b, Demokratischer Konstitutionalismus jenseits des Staates? Perspektiven auf die Umstrittenheit von Normen, in Niesen, Peter and Herborth, Benjamin, eds., Anarchie der Freiheit - Habermas und die internationalen Beziehungen, Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp, 178–203.Google Scholar

Wiener, Antje 2004, Contested compliance: Interventions on the normative structure of world politics, European Journal of International Relations, 10(2): 189–234.Google Scholar

Wiener, Antje 2003, Constructivism: The limits of bridging gaps, Journal of International Relations and Development 6 (2): 253–276.Google Scholar

Wiener, Antje 1999, From special to specialized rights: The politics of citizenship and identity in the European Union, in Hannan, Michael and Tilly, Charles, eds., Extending Citizenship, Reconfiguring States. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 195–227.Google Scholar

Wiener, Antje 1998, ‘European’ Citizenship Practice: Building Institutions of a Non-State, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Wiener, Antje 1997, Making sense of the new geography of citizenship: Fragmented citizenship in the European Union, Theory and Society 26 (4): 529–560.Google Scholar

Wiener, Antje 1996, Rethinking citizenship: The quest for place-oriented participation in the EU, Oxford International Review 7 (3): 44–51.Google Scholar

Wiener, Antje and Hofius, Maren 2016, Normative meaning in crisis: Contestation for consent in international relations, unpublished Research Proposal, University of Hamburg (with Sassan Gholiagha).Google Scholar

Wiener, Antje and Oeter, Stefan 2016, Introduction: Who recognizes the emperor’s clothes anymore? International Journal of Constitutional Law 14 (3): 608–621.Google Scholar

Wiener, Antje and Schwellnus, Guido 2004, Contested norms of European enlargement, in: Bermann, George and Pistor, Katharina, eds., Law and Governance in an Enlarged European Union, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 455–488.Google Scholar

Wilkens, Jan 2015, Contention and constitutionalization in the global realm: Assessing the uprising in West Asia and North Africa and their impact on international politics, in: Gerges, Fawaz A., ed., Contentious Politics in the Middle East: Popular Resistance and Marginalised Activism beyond the Arab Uprisings, London and New York, NY: Palgrave-Macmillan, 25–50.Google Scholar

Wilkens, Jan, Hofius, Maren, and Wiener, Antje 2016, A meaningful world among others: Contending narrations of legitimate orders, Paper presented at the Peregrine Talk Series, Lauterpacht Centre for International Law, Cambridge, 23 November 2016.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1961, Tractatus logico-philosophicus: The German text of Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung, London et al.: Routledge & K Paul: Humanities Press.Google Scholar

Wolff, Jonas and Zimmermann, Lisbeth 2015, Between Banyans and battle scenes: Liberal norms, contestation, and the limits of critique, Review of International Studies 24 (3): 513–534.Google Scholar

Yanow, Dvora 1996, How does a policy mean? Interpreting policy and organizational actions, Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Yanow, Dvora and Tsoukas, Haridimos 2009, What is reflection-in-action? A phenomenological account, Journal of Management Studies 46 (8): 1339–1364.Google Scholar

Young, Oran R. 1991, Political leadership and regime formation: On the development of institutions in international society, International Organization 45 (3): 281–308.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Lisbeth 2017, Global Norms with a Local Face, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Lisbeth 2017, ‘Inter-national’ Habermas: Contestation and understanding under conditions of diversity, Polity 49 (1): 149–155.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, Lisbeth 2016, Same same or different? Norm diffusion between resistance, compliance, and localization in post-conflict states, International Studies Perspective 17 (1): 98–115.Google Scholar

Zwingel, Susanne 2012, How do norms travel? Theorizing international women’s rights in transnational perspective, International Studies Quarterly 56 (1): 115–129.Google Scholar

Zypries, Brigitte 2004, Strafverfolgung von Völkerrechtsverbrechen: eine Herausforderung für die deutsche Justiz, in: Theissen, Gunnar and Nagler, Martin, eds., Der Internationale Strafgerichtshof: fünf Jahre nach Rom Tagungsdokumentation Berlin, 27–28. Juni 2003, Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Menschenrechte, 11–17.Google Scholar