Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:13:14.200Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

25 - The American Convention on Human Rights

Regulation of Hate Speech and Similar Expression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Michael Herz
Affiliation:
Cardozo School of Law
Peter Molnar
Affiliation:
Center for Media and Communications, Central European University, Budapest
Get access

Summary

Hate speech is defined by both its intent and its target. With respect to intent, hate speech is speech designed to intimidate, oppress, or incite hatred or violence on the basis of characteristics such as race, religion, nationality, gender, sexual orientation, or disability. With respect to its target, it is speech directed against a person or group based on such characteristics. Historically, hate speech has known no boundaries of time or place. It has been used by officials and others in Nazi Germany, by the Ku Klux Klan in the United States, by a full range of actors in Bosnia during the 1990s, and during the 1994 Rwandan genocide. But hate speech has a common thread: It is used to harass, to persecute, and to justify the deprivation of human rights. At its most extreme, hate speech can be used even to rationalize murder, as the world saw just a few years ago in Rwanda.

In the wake of the German Holocaust, and with the rise of the Internet and other media that can spread hate speech almost instantaneously, many governments and intergovernmental bodies have tried to limit the harmful effects of hate speech. Around the world, countries have criminalized incitement to hatred or violence; degrading, defamatory, or insulting speech; the display of discriminatory symbols or emblems; the possession and distribution of discriminatory materials; and the approval or justification of genocide or crimes against humanity. Some of these criminal prohibitions also reach new forms of hate speech, such as genocide denial or minimization and religious defamation.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Content and Context of Hate Speech
Rethinking Regulation and Responses
, pp. 499 - 513
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bertoni, EduardoHate Speech Under The American Convention On Human Rights 12 ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law 2006Google Scholar
Braun, StefanDemocracy Off Balance: Freedom of Expression and Hate Propaganda Law in CanadaUniversity of Toronto Press 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992
2003
The Inter-American System of Human RightsHarris, David J.Livingstone, ScottOxford University Press 1998
Defeis, Elizabeth F.Freedom of Speech and International Norms: A Response to Hate SpeechStan. J. Int'l L 57 1992Google Scholar
Oyediran, JoannaArticle 13(5) of the American Convention on Human RightsStriking a Balance: Hate Speech, Freedom of Expression and Non-discriminationUniversity of Essex 1992Google Scholar
Farrior, StephanieHolding the Matrix: The Historical and Theoretical Foundations of International Law Concerning Hate SpeechBerkeley J. Int'l L 1 1996Google Scholar
Catlin, Scott J.A Proposal for Regulation Hate Speech in the United States: Balancing Rights under the International Covenant on Civil and Political RightsNotre Dame L. Rev 771 1994Google Scholar
Partsch, Karl JosefFreedom of Conscience and Expression, and Political FreedomsThe International Bill of Rights: The Covenant on Civil and Political RightsColumbia University Press 1981Google Scholar
Weinstein, JamesHate Speech, Viewpoint Neutrality, and the American Concept of DemocracyThe Boundaries of Freedom of Expression and Order in American DemocracyKent State University Press 2001Google Scholar
Schauer, FrederickMrs. Palsgraf and the First AmendmentWash. & Lee L. Rev 161 1990Google Scholar
1986
Lawrence, Frederick M.Violence-Conducive Speech: Punishable Verbal Assault or Protected Political Speech?Freedom of Speech and Incitement Against DemocracyKluwer Law International 2000Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×