Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T16:13:45.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - The outcomes of constructive controversy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2015

David W. Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access

Summary

THE INKLINGS

Two of the most influential English writers of the twentieth century were J. R. R. Tolkien and C. S. Lewis. Tolkien wrote The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings trilogy. Lewis wrote a series of theological books (such as Mere Christianity as well as The Narnia Chronicles). While each is recognized as a genius, what many people do not know is that the two men were close friends, deeply involved in each other's work, and greatly influenced by each other's thought and writing.

The answer to how these disparate individuals became such close friends may be found in a group known as “The Inklings” (which means “hints, suggestions, or vague ideas”). The Inklings met twice a week. One of the members would produce a manuscript (a poem, story, or chapter) and begin to read it aloud. Other members’ criticism and support would follow. Then there might be more reading before the proceedings drifted into a general discussion and often heated debate on almost any subject that happened to arise. This process created a number of important outcomes.

The first outcome was encouragement. In C. S. Lewis, for example, Tolkien found an appreciative and sympathetic audience. “The unpayable debt that I owe to him,” Tolkien wrote of Lewis years later, “was not ‘influence’ as it is ordinarily understood, but sheer encouragement.”

The second outcome was motivation. Tolkien told Walter Hooper, “I wrote the Lord of the Rings to make Lewis a story out of The Silmarillion.” The meetings of the Inklings represented a network of minds energizing each other into creativity.

The third outcome was pressure to work. In the beginning of 1944 Tolkien had done no work on The Lord of the Rings for several months. Lewis, noticing his friend's lack of progress, urged him to resume work. “I needed some pressure,” wrote Tolkien in a letter, “and shall probably respond.” By April he was writing again.

The fourth outcome was the cross-fertilization of ideas.

Type
Chapter
Information
Constructive Controversy
Theory, Research, Practice
, pp. 85 - 107
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×