Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
The Construction of Preference
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 267
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Buy the print book

Book description

One of the main themes that has emerged from behavioral decision research during the past three decades is the view that people's preferences are often constructed in the process of elicitation. This idea is derived from studies demonstrating that normatively equivalent methods of elicitation (e.g., choice and pricing) give rise to systematically different responses. These preference reversals violate the principle of procedure invariance that is fundamental to all theories of rational choice. If different elicitation procedures produce different orderings of options, how can preferences be defined and in what sense do they exist? This book shows not only the historical roots of preference construction but also the blossoming of the concept within psychology, law, marketing, philosophy, environmental policy, and economics. Decision making is now understood to be a highly contingent form of information processing, sensitive to task complexity, time pressure, response mode, framing, reference points, and other contextual factors.

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents


Page 1 of 2



Page 1 of 2


References
Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity. New York: The Free Press. [10, 34]
Abdellaoui, M. (2000). Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions. Management Science, 46, 1497–1512. [32]
Abelson, R. P., & Levi, A. (1985). Decision making and decision theory. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 231–309). New York: Random House. [7, 19]
Ackerman, F., & Heinzerling, L. (2004). Priceless: On knowing the price of everything and the value of nothing. New York: The New Press. [36]
Ainslie, G. (1975). Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 463–496. [20]
Ainslie, G. (1992). Picoeconomics: The strategic interaction of successive motivational states within the person. New York: Cambridge University Press. [20]
Ainslie, G., & Haslam, N. (1992). Self-control. In Loewenstein, G. & Elster, J. (Eds.), Choice over time (pp. 177–209). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. [20]
Ajzen, I., & Peterson, G. L. (1988). Contingent value measurement: The price of everything and the value of nothing? In Peterson, G. L., Driver, B. L., & Gregory, R. (Eds.), Amenity resource valuation: Integrating economics with other disciplines (pp. 65–76). State College, PA: Venture. [33]
Alba, J. W., & Chattopadhyay, A. (1985). Effects of context and part-category cues on recall of competing brands. Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 340–349. [34]
Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 411–454. [15, 17]
Alba, J. W., Hutchinson, J. W., & Lynch, J. G., Jr. (1991). Memory and decision making. In Robertson, T. S. & Kassarjian, H. H. (Eds.), Handbook of consumer behavior (pp. 1–49). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [10]
Alba, J. W., Lynch, J. G., Weitz, B., Janiszweki, C., Lutz, R. J., Sawyer, A. G., et al. (1997). Interactive home shopping: Consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces. Journal of Marketing, 61, 38–53. [17]
Alba, J. W., & Marmorstein, H. (1987). The effects of frequency knowledge on consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 14–26. [17]
Alhakami, A. S., & Slovic, P. (1994). A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. Risk Analysis, 14, 1085–1096. [23, 24]
Allais, M. (1953). Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulate et axioms de l'école americaine [The behavior of rational man in risk situations: A critique of the axioms and postulates of the American school]. Econometrica, 21, 503–546. [1, 2, 9, 19, 27]
Allison, G. T. (1971). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston: Little Brown. [22]
American Medical Association. (1993). Strategies for cadaveric organ procurement: Mandated choice and presumed consent. Chicago: American Medical Association. [37]
Ames, D. R., Flynn, F. J., & Weber, E. U. (2004). It's the thought that counts: On perceiving how helpers decide to lend a hand. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 461–474. [21]
Amiel, Y., Cowell, F. A., Davidovitz, L., & Plovin, A. (2003). Preference reversals and the analysis of income distributions (No. DARP 66). Retrieved April 20, 2005, from London School of Economics, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines Web site: http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/publications/darp.asp. [1]
Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (in press). Decisions by rules: The case of unwillingness to pay for beneficial delays. Journal of Marketing Research. [28, 29]
Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [21]
Anderson, J. R., & Reder, L. M. (1999). The fan effect: New results and new theories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 186–197. [21]
Anderson, M. C., & Neely, J. H. (1996). Interference and inhibition in memory retrieval. In Bjork, E. L. & Bjork, R. A. (Eds.), Memory (2nd ed., pp. 237–313). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. [21]
Anderson, M. C., & Spellman, B. A. (1995). On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: Memory retrieval as a model case. Psychological Review, 102, 68–100. [21]
Anderson, N. (1996). A functional theory of cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [31]
Anderson, N. D., & Craik, F. I. M. (2000). Memory in the aging brain. In Tulving, E. & Craik, F. I. M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 411–425). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [21]
Argyle, M. (1987). The psychology of happiness. London: Methuen. [28]
Ariely, D. (1998). Combining experiences over time: The effects of duration, intensity changes and on-line measurements on retrospective pain evaluations. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11, 19–45. [9, 13, 29]
Ariely, D., & Carmon, Z. (2003). Summary assessment of experiences: The whole is different from the sum of its parts. In Loewenstein, G., Read, D., & Baumeister, R. F. (Eds.), Time and decision: Economic and psychological perspectives on intertemporal choice (pp. 323–349). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. [14]
Ariely, D., & Levav, J. (2000). Sequential choice in group settings: Taking the road less traveled and less enjoyed. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 279–290. [29]
Ariely, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2000). The importance of duration in ratings of and choices between sequences of outcomes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 508–523. [13]
Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2002). Determinants of anchoring effects (Working paper). [13]
Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2003). Coherent arbitrariness: Stable demand curves without stable preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 73–105. [1, 13, 14, 21, 35]
Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2006). Tom Sawyer and the myth of fundamental value. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 60, 1–10. [1, 14]
Ariely, D., & Wallsten, T. (1995). Seeking subjective dominance in multidimensional space: An explanation of the asymmetric dominance effect. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 223–232. [18]
Ariely, D., & Zauberman, G. (2000). On the making of an experience: The effects of breaking and combining experiences on their overall evaluation. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 219–232. [13]
Arkes, H. R. (2001). The attribution of cues, implicit memory, and human judgment. Columbus, OH: Department of Psychology, Ohio State University. [21]
Arkes, H. R., & Ayton, P. (1999). The sunk cost and Concorde effects: Are humans less rational than lower animals?Psychological Bulletin, 125, 591–600. [29]
Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 124–140. [29]
Arrow, K. J. (1982). Risk perception in psychology and economics. Economic Inquiry, 20, 1–9. [6, 27, 31, 34, 36]
Arrow, K. J., Solow, R., Portney, P. R., Leamer, E. E., Radner, R., & Schuman, H. (1993). Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation.Washington, DC: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. [31, 33, 34]
Axelrod, P. (1976). Structure of decision: The cognitive maps of political elites. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University. [18]
Ayres, I., & Gertner, R. (1989). Filling gaps in incomplete contracts: An economic theory of default rules. Yale Law Journal, 99, 87–130. [38]
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [20]
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman. [35]
Barber, B., Heath, C., & Odean, T. (2002). Good rationales sell: Reason-based choice among group and individual investors in the stock market. (Working paper). Stanford, CA: Stanford University. [29]
Bar-Gad, I., & Bergman, H. (2001). Stepping out of the box: Information processing in the neural networks of the basal ganglia. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 689–695. [11]
Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230–244. [21]
Baron, J. (1988). Thinking and deciding. New York: Cambridge University Press. [9, 34]
Baron, J. (1997a). Biases in the quantitative measurement of values for public decisions. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 72–88. [34]
Baron, J. (1997b). Confusion of relative and absolute risk in valuation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14, 301–309. [9, 23]
Baron, J. (2000). Thinking and deciding (3rd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. [12]
Baron, J., & Greene, J. (1996). Determinants of insensitivity to quantity in valuation of public goods: Contribution, warm glow, budget constraints, availability, and prominence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 107–125. [31, 32, 34]
Baron, J., & Ritov, I. (1994). Reference points and omission bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59, 475–498. [37]
Baron, J., & Spranca, M. (1997). Protected values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 1–16. [34]
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social-psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. [15]
Barsalou, L. W. (1992). Cognitive psychology: An overview for cognitive scientists. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [31]
Bartels, L. M. (1998, September). Democracy with attitudes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Political Science Association, Boston. [31]
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [1]
Bateman, I. A., Carson, R., Day, R., Hanemann, M., Hanley, N., Hett, T., et al. (2002). Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: A manual.Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. [1]
Bateman, I. A., Dent, S., Peters, E., Starmer, C., & Slovic, P. (2006). The affect heuristic and the attractiveness of simple gambles. (Report No. 06-06). Eugene, OR: Decision Research. [1, 23]
Bateman, I. A., & Willis, K. G. (1999). Valuing environmental preferences.New York: Oxford University Press. [38]
Bazerman, M. H., Loewenstein, G., & White, S. B. (1992). Reversals of preference in allocation decisions: Judging an alternative versus choosing among alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 220–240. [9, 10, 28]
Bazerman, M. H., Moore, D. A., Tenbrunsel, A. E., Wade-Benzoni, K. A., & Blount, S. (1999). Explaining how preferences change across joint versus separate evaluation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 39, 41–58. [29]
Bazerman, M. H., & Neale, M. A. (1992). Negotiating rationally.New York: The Free Press. [34]
Bazerman, M. H., Schroth, H. A., Shah, P. P., Diekmann, K. A., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (1994). The inconsistent role of comparison others and procedural justice in reactions to hypothetical job descriptions: Implications for job acceptance procedures. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60, 326–352. [9]
Bazerman, M. H., Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Wade-Benzoni, K. A. (1998). Negotiating with yourself and losing: Understanding and managing competing internal preferences. Academy of Management Review, 23, 225–241. [9]
Bazerman, M. H., White, S. B., & Loewenstein, G. (1995). Perceptions of fairness in interpersonal and individual choice situations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 39–43. [1]
Beach, L. R. (1990). Image theory: Decision making in personal and organizational contexts.Chichester, UK: Wiley. [17, 18, 19]
Beach, L. R., & Lipshitz, R. (1993). Why classical decision theory is an appropriate standard for evaluating and aiding most human decision making. In Klein, G. A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., & Zsambok, C. E. (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 21–35). Norwood, NJ: Ables. [18]
Beach, L. R., & Mitchell, T. R. (1978). A contingency model for the selection of decision strategies. Academy of Management Review, 3, 439–449. [19]
Beach, L. R., & Mitchell, T. R. (1987). Image theory: Principles, goals, and plans in decision making. Acta Psychologica, 66, 201–308. [21]
Beattie, J., & Baron, J. (1991). Investigating the effect of stimulus range on attribute weight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 571–585. [9]
Beattie, J., Baron, J., Hershey, J. C., & Spranca, M. D. (1994). Psychological determinants of decision attitude. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7, 129–144. [16]
Beattie, J., Covey, J., Dolan, P., Hopkins, L., Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G., et al. (1998). On the contingent valuation of safety and the safety of contingent valuation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 17, 5–25. [35]
Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7–15. [24]
Becker, G. M., DeGroot, D. H., & Marschak, J. (1963). An experimental study of some stochastic models for wagers. Behavioral Science, 8, 41–55. [13]
Becker, G. M., DeGroot, M. H., & Marschak, J. (1964). Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science, 9, 226–232. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8]
Becker, G. S. (1962). Irrational behavior and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy, 70, 1–13. [13]
Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169–217. [5]
Becker, G. S. (1973). A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 813–846. [5]
Becker, G. S. (1974). A theory of marriage: Part II. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 511–526. [5]
Beckmann, J., & Kuhl, J. (1984). Altering information to gain action control: Functional aspects of human information processing in decision making. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 224–237. [18]
Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139–168. [17]
Bell, B. E., & Loftus, E. F. (1989). Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: The power of (a few) minor details. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 669–679. [21]
Bell, D. E. (1982). Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 30, 961–981. [36]
Bellah, R., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W., Swindler, A., & Tipton, S. (1985). Habits of the heart.Los Angeles: University of California Press. [16]
Bellman, S., Johnson, E. J., & Lohse, G. L. (2001). To opt-in or opt-out? It depends on the question. Communications of the ACM, 44(2), 25–27. [37]
Bellman, S., Lohse, G. L., & Johnson, E. J. (1999). Predictors of online buying behavior. Communications of the ACM, 42(12), 32–38. [15]
Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 2–62). New York: Academic Press. [22]
Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 73–92. [20]
Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (1999). Risk aversion or myopia? Choices in repeated gambles and retirement investments. Management Science, 45, 364–381. [38]
Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (2002). How much is investor autonomy worth?Journal of Finance, 57, 1593–1616. [38]
Benson, L. (1993). Studies in human decision making: On the effects of experimental instructions, framing, and time constraints. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. [19]
Benson, L., & Svenson, O. (1992). Post-decision consolidation following the debriefing of subjects about experimental manipulations affecting their prior decisions. Lund University, Psychological Research Bulletin, 32 (3). [19]
Bentham, J. (1996). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation (J. H. Burns & H. L. A. Hart, Eds.). New York: Oxford University Press (Original work published in 1823). [27]
Benthin, A., Slovic, P., Moran, P., Severson, H., Mertz, C. K., & Gerrard, M. (1995). Adolescent health-threatening and health-enhancing behaviors: A study of word association and imagery. Journal of Adolescent Health, 17, 143–152. [23]
Benthorn, L. (1994). On post-decision processes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. [19]
Berg, J. E., Dickhaut, J. W., & O'Brien, J. R. (1985). Preference reversal and arbitrage. In Smith, V. L. (Ed.), Research in experimental economics (pp. 31–72). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. [8]
Berg, J. E., Dickhaut, J. W., & Rietz, T. A. (2003). Preference reversals and induced risk preferences: Evidence for noisy maximization. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 27, 139–170. [1]
Berman, L. (1982). Planning a tragedy.New York: Norton. [22]
Bernoulli, D. (1954). Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk (L. Sommer, Trans.). Econometrica, 22, 23–36 (Reprinted from Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae, 1738, 5, 175–192). [2]
Bettman, J. R. (1979). An information processing theory of consumer choice.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [1, 17]
Bettman, J. R., Johnson, E. J., & Payne, J. W. (1991). Consumer decision making. In Robertson, T. S. & Kassarjian, H. H. (Eds.), Handbook of consumer behavior (pp. 50–84). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [19]
Bettman, J. R., & Kakkar, P. (1977). Effects of information presentation format on consumer information acquisition strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 3, 233–240. [7]
Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. (1998). Constructive consumer choice processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 187–217. [1, 17, 29, 34]
Bettman, J. R., & Park, C. W. (1980). Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes: A protocol analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 234–248. [17]
Bettman, J. R., Payne, J. W., & Staelin, R. (1986). Cognitive considerations in designing effective labels for presenting risk information. Journal of Marketing and Public Policy, 5, 1–28. [34]
Bettman, J. R., & Sujan, M. (1987). Effects of framing on evaluation of comparable and noncomparable alternatives by expert and novice consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 141–154. [15, 17]
Bettman, J. R., & Zins, M. A. (1979). Information format and choice task effects in decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 6, 141–153. [7]
Betts, R., & Gelb, L. (1979). The irony of Vietnam: The system worked.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. [22]
Bewley, T. F. (1998). Why not cut pay?European Economic Review, 62, 459–490. [13]
Beyth-Marom, R., & Fischhoff, B. (1997). Adolescent decisions about risk. In Schulenberg, J., Maggs, J., & Hurnelmans, K. (Eds.), Health risks and developmental transactions during adolescence (pp. 110–135). New York: Cambridge University Press. [35]
Biehal, G., & Chakravarti, D. (1983). Information accessibility as a moderator of consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 1–14. [10]
Biehal, G., & Chakravarti, D. (1986). Consumers' use of memory and external information on choice: Macro and micro perspectives. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 382–405. [15]
Biel, A., & Montgomery, H. (1986). Scenarios in energy planning. In Brehmer, B., Jungermann, H., Lourens, P., & Sevon, G. (Eds.), New directions in research on decision making (pp. 205–218). Amsterdam: North-Holland. [18]
Bigelow, J. (Ed.). (1887). The complete works of Benjamin Franklin (Vol. 4). New York: Putnam. [22]
Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology.New York: Cambridge University Press. [22]
Billig, M. (1991). Ideology and opinions. London: Sage. [18]
Billings, R. S., & Scherer, L. L. (1988). The effect of response mode and importance on decision-making strategies: Judgment versus choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 1–19. [10]
Birnbaum, M. H. (1982). Controversies in psychological measurement. In Wegener, B. (Ed.), Social attitudes and psychophysical measurement (pp. 401–485). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [1]
Birnbaum, M. H. (1992). Issues in utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 319–330. [9]
Birnbaum, M. H., & Mellers, B. A. (1979). Stimulus recognition may mediate exposure effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1090–1096. [25]
Birnbaum, M. H., & Stegner, S. E. (1979). Source credibility in social judgment: Bias, expertise, and the judge's point of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 48–74. [21]
Birnbaum, M. H., & Sutton, S. E. (1992). Scale convergence and utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 183–215. [1, 11]
Bishop, R. C. (1986). Resource valuation under uncertainty: Theoretical principles for empirical research. In Smith, V. K. (Ed.), Advances in applied micro-economics (Vol. 4, pp. 133–152). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. [33]
Bishop, R. C., & Heberlein, T. A. (1979). Measuring values of extramarket goods: Are indirect measures biased?American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61, 926–930. [33]
Bizer, G. Y., & Krosnick, J. A. (2001). Exploring the structure of strength-related attitude features: The relation between attitude importance and attitude accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 566–586. [15]
Blattberg, R. C., & Neslin, S. A. (1990). Sales promotion: Concepts, methods, and strategies.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [22]
Bleichrodt, H., & Pinto, J. (2000). A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis. Management Science, 46, 1485–1497. [32]
Blom Kemdal, A., & Montgomery, H. (1997). Perspectives and emotions in personal decision making. In Ranyard, R., Crozier, W. R., & Svenson, O. (Eds.), Decision making: Cognitive models and explanations (pp. 72–89). London: Routledge. [18]
Blount, S., & Bazerman, M. H. (1996). The inconsistent evaluation of absolute versus comparative payoffs in labor supply and bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 30, 227–240. [9]
Bockenholt, U., Albert, D., Aschenbrenner, M., & Schmalhofer, F. (1991). The effects of attractiveness, dominance, and attribute differences on information acquisition in multiattribute binary choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 49, 258–281. [18]
Bohm, P. (1994). Behavior under uncertainty without preference reversals: A field experiment. Empirical Economics, 19, 185–200. [1]
Bohm, P., & Lind, H. (1993). Preference reversal, real-world lotteries, and lottery-interested subjects. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 22, 327–348. [1]
Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265–289. [23]
Bostic, R., Herrnstein, R. J., & Luce, R. D. (1990). The effect on the preference-reversal phenomenon of using choice indifferences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 13, 193–212. [1, 8]
Bovie, P. (Ed.). (1992). Terence: The comedies.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. [16]
Bower, G. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129–148. [24]
Boyle, K., Desvousges, W., Johnson, F., Dunford, R., & Hudson, S. (1994). An investigation of part-whole biases in contingent valuation studies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27, 64–83. [32]
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The Self-Assessment Manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49–59. [24]
Braga, J., & Starmer, C. (2004). Does market experience eliminate preference reversal? Unpublished manuscript. [1]
Brandstätter, E., Kühberger, A., & Schneider, F. (2002). A cognitive-emotional account of the shape of the probability weighting function. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 79–100. [32]
Brehm, J. W. (1956). Post-decision changes in desirability of alternatives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 384–389. [19, 26]
Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance.New York: Academic Press. [16]
Brehmer, B. (1990). Strategies in real-time dynamic decision making. In Hogarth, R. (Ed.), Insights in decision making: A tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn (pp. 262–279). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [18]
Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulman, R. J. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 917–927. [27, 28, 30]
Bromley, D. (Ed.). (1986). National resource economics: Policy problems and contemporary analysis.Boston: Kluwer/Nijhoff Publishing. [33]
Brookshire, D. S., & Coursey, D. (1987). Measuring the value of a public good: An empirical comparison of elicitation procedures. American Economic Review, 77(4), 554–566. [33]
Brookshire, D. S., Thayer, M. A., Schulze, W. D., & D'Arge, R. C. (1982). Valuing public goods: A comparison of survey and hedonic approaches. American Economic Review, 72(1), 165–177. [33]
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Company. (1999). Kool Natural Lights [Advertisement]. [23]
Brown, C., & Feinberg, F. (2002). How does choice affect evaluations?Advances in Consumer Research, 29, 331–332. [28]
Brown, T. C. (1984). The concept of value in resource allocation. Land Economics, 60, 231–246. [33]
Brown, T. C., & Slovic, P. (1988). Effects of context on economic measures of value. In Peterson, G. L., Driver, B. L., & Gregory, R. (Eds.), Integrating economic and psychological knowledge in valuations of public amenity resources (pp. 23–30). State College, PA: Venture. [33]
Brownstein, A. (2003). Biased pre-decision processing. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 545–568. [12, 19]
Brucks, M. (1985). The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 1–16. [15]
Brucks, M. (1988). Search monitor: An approach for computer-controlled experiments involving consumer information search. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 117–121. [15]
Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123–152. [15]
Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A. (1956). A study of thinking.New York: Wiley. [2]
Busemeyer, J. R., & Diederich, A. (2002). Survey of decision field theory. Mathematical Social Sciences, 43, 345–370. [11]
Busemeyer, J. R., & Goldstein, D. G. (1992). Linking together different measures of preference: A dynamic model of matching derived from decision field theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 370–396. [11]
Busemeyer, J. R., Hastie, R., & Medin, D. L. (1995). Decision making from a cognitive perspective.San Diego, CA: Academic. [23]
Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1992). Fundamental derivations for decision field theory. Mathematical Social Sciences, 23, 255–282. [11]
Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic cognition approach to decision making. Psychological Review, 100, 432–459. [11, 12, 19]
Busemeyer, J. R., Townsend, J. T., & Stout, J. C. (2002). Motivational underpinnings of utility in decision making: Decision Field Theory analysis of deprivation and satiation. In Moore, S. C. & Oaksford, M. (Eds.), Advances in consciousness research: Vol. 44. Emotional cognition: From brain to behaviour (pp. 197–219). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [11]
Cabanac, M. (1992). Pleasure: The common currency. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 155, 173–200. [24]
Calabresi, G., & Melamed, A. D. (1972). Property rules, liability rules, and inalienability: One view of the cathedral. Harvard Law Review, 85, 1089–1128. [38]
Caldwell, C. (2004, March 1). Select all: Can we have too many choices?The New Yorker, pp. 91–93. [1]
Calle, E. E., Thun, M. J., Petrelli, J. M., Rodriguez, C., & Heath, C. W., Jr. (1999). Body-mass index and mortality in a prospective cohort of U.S. adults. New England Journal of Medicine, 341, 1097–1105. [38]
Camerer, C. F. (2000). Prospect theory in the wild: Evidence from the field. In Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (Eds.), Choices, values, and frames (pp. 288–300). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [38]
Camerer, C. F., Babcock, L., Loewenstein, G., & Thaler, R. H. (1997). Labor supply of New York City cab drivers: One day at a time. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 407–441. [20]
Camerer, C. F., & Ho, T. (1994). Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probabilities. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8, 167–196. [32]
Camerer, C. F., & Hogarth, R. M. (1999). The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 1–3, 7–42. [38]
Camerer, C. F., Issacharoff, S., Loewenstein, G., O'Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2003). Regulation for conservatives: Behavioral economics and the case for “asymmetric paternalism.”University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151, 2111–2154. [37]
Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G., & Weber, M. (1989). The curse of knowledge in economic settings: An experimental analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 117, 1232–1254. [13]
Caplan, A. L. (1994). Current ethical issues in organ procurement and transplantation. Journal of the American Medical Association, 272, 1708–1709. [37]
Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human computer interaction.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [7]
Carlson, K. A., & Klein Pearo, L. (2004). Limiting predecisional distortion by prior valuation of attribute components. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 94, 48–59. [19]
Carlson, K. A., & Russo, J. E. (2001). Biased interpretation of evidence by mock jurors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 91–103. [21]
Carroll, J. D. (1972). Individual differences and multidimensional scaling. In Shepard, R. N., Romney, A. K., & Neriove, S. (Eds.), Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral sciences: Vol. 1. Theory (pp. 105–155). New York: Seminar Press. [6]
Carson, R. T., Hanemann, M., Kopp, R., Krosnick, J., Mitchell, R., Presser, S., et al. (1994). Prospective interim lost use value due to DDT and PCB contamination in the Southern California Bight.La Jolla, CA: Natural Resource Damage Assessment. [31]
Carson, R. T., & Mitchell, R. C. (1993). The issue of scope in contingent valuation studies. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75, 1263–1267. [31, 32]
Carson, R. T., & Mitchell, R. C. (1995). Sequencing and nesting in contingent valuation surveys. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28, 155–173. [31]
Casey, J. T. (1991). Reversal of the preference reversal phenomenon. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48, 224–251. [1]
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2003). 1991–2001 prevalence of obesity among U.S. adults, by characteristics. Retrieved May 6, 2004, from http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/obesity/trend/prev_char.htm. [38]
Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology.New York: Guilford Press. [1, 32]
Chapman, G. B., & Bornstein, B. (1996). The more you ask the more you get: Anchoring in personal injury verdicts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 519–540. [31]
Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (1994). The limits of anchoring. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7, 223–242. [21]
Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (1999). Anchoring, activation, and the construction of values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79, 115–153. [13, 14, 15, 21]
Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (2002). Incorporating the irrelevant: Anchors in judgments of belief and value. In Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.), Intuitive judgment: Heuristics and biases (pp. 120–138). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [21]
Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215–224. [24]
Cherry, T. L., Crocker, T. D., & Shogren, J. F. (2003). Rationality spillovers. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, 63–84. [1]
Chitturi, R., Raghunathan, R., & Mahajan, V. (2003). Form vs. function: Emotional and behavioral consequences of trading off hedonic vs. utilitarian attributes (Working paper).University of Texas, Austin. [29]
Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B. C., & Metrick, A. (2002). Defined contribution pensions: Plan rules, participant decisions, and the path of least resistance. In Poterba, J. M. (Ed.), Tax policy and the economy (Vol. 16, pp. 67–113). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [38]
Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B. C., & Metrick, A. (2004). For better or for worse: Default effects and 401(k) savings behavior. In Wise, D. (Ed.), Perspectives in the economics of aging (pp. 81–121). University of Chicago. [37]
Christensen-Szalanski, J. J. J. (1978). Problem-solving strategies: A selection mechanism, some implications, and some data. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 307–323. [16]
Christensen-Szalanski, J. J. J. (1980). A further examination of the selection of problem-solving strategies: The effects of deadlines and analytic aptitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25, 107–122. [16]
Christensen-Szalanski, J. J. J. (1984). Discount functions and the measurement of patients' values: Women's values during childbirth. Medical Decision Making, 4, 47–58. [27]
Chu, Y. P., & Chu, R. L. (1990). The subsidence of preference reversals in simplified and marketlike experimental settings: A note. American Economic Review, 80(4), 902–911. [1]
Cicchetti, C., & Dubin, J. (1994). A microeconomic analysis of risk aversion and the decision to self-insure. Journal of Political Economy, 102, 169–186. [20]
Clay, M., & Block, W. (2002). A free market for human organs. Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies, 27, 227–236. [37]
Clemen, R. T. (1996). Making hard decisions: An introduction to decision analysis.Belmont, CA: Duxbury. [34]
Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44. [37]
Cohen, M. S. (1993). The naturalistic basis of decision biases. In Klein, G. A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., & Zsambok, C. E. (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 51–99). Norwood, NJ: Ables. [18]
Cohen, M. S., Freeman, J. P., & Wolf, S. (1996). Metarecognition in time-stressed decision making: Recognizing, critiquing, and correcting. Human Factors, 38, 206–219. [18]
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428. [15, 21]
Collins, B. E., & Hoyt, M. G. (1972). Personal responsibility for consequences: An integration and extension of the “forced compliance” literature. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 558–593. [16]
Connolly, T., & Zeelenberg, M. (2002). Regret in decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 212–215. [24]
Constans, J. I., & Mathews, A. M. (1993). Mood and the subjective risk of future events. Cognition & Emotion, 7, 545–560. [24]
Coombs, C. H. (1958). On the use of inconsistency of preference in psychological measurement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 1–7. [19]
Coombs, C. H., Bezembinder, T. G., & Goode, F. M. (1967). Testing expectation theories of decision making without measuring utility or subjective probability. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 4, 72–103. [2, 3, 6]
Coombs, C. H., & Pruitt, D. G. (1960). Components of risk in decision making: Probability and variance preferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 265–277. [1, 2]
Cooper, J., & Fazio, R. H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 17, pp. 229–266). Orlando, FL: Academic Press. [16]
Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 715–730. [16]
Cortese, A. E., & Stepanek, M. (1998, May 4). Goodbye to fixed pricing? How electronic commerce could create the most efficient market of them all. Business Week, pp. 70–71. [15]
Coupey, E. (1994). Restructuring: Constructive processing of information displays in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 83–99. [17, 19]
Coupey, E., Irwin, J. R., & Payne, J. W. (1998). Product category familiarity and preference construction. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 459–467. [9, 15]
Coursey, D. L., Hovis, J. J., & Schulze, W. D. (1987). The disparity between willingness to accept and willingness to pay measures of value. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102, 679–690. [9]
Cox, J. C., & Epstein, S. (1989). Preference reversals without the independence axiom. American Economic Review, 79(3), 408–426. [1, 8]
Cox, J. C., & Grether, D. M. (1996). The preference reversal phenomenon: Response mode, markets, and incentives. Economic Theory, 7, 381–405. [1, 13]
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. M. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302. [33]
Cropper, M. L., Aydede, S. K., & Portney, P. R. (1994). Preferences for life-saving programs: How the public discounts time and age. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 8, 243–265. [38]
Cubitt, R. P., Munro, A., & Starmer, C. (2004). Testing explanations of preference reversal. The Economic Journal, 114, 709–726. [1]
Cummings, R. G., Brookshire, D. S., & Schulze, W. D. (1986). Valuing environmental goods: Assessment of the contingent valuation method.Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld. [1, 33]
Cummings, R. G., Harrison, G. W., & Rutstrom, E. E. (1995). Homegrown values and hypothetical surveys: Is the dichotomous choice approach incentive-compatible?American Economic Review, 85(1), 260–266. [31]
Dahlstrand, U., & Montgomery, H. (1984). Information search and evaluative processes in decision making: A computer-based process tracing study. Acta Psychologica, 56, 113–123. [18]
Dale, H. C. A. (1959). A priori probabilities in gambling. Nature, 183, 842–843. [2]
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain.New York: Avon. [1, 23, 24]
Damasio, A. R., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (1990). Individuals with sociopathic behavior caused by frontal damage fail to respond autonomically to social stimuli. Behavioural Brain Research, 41, 81–94. [23]
Darley, J. M., & Berscheid, E. (1967). Increased liking caused by the anticipation of interpersonal contact. Human Relations, 10, 29–40. [30]
Davidson, A. R., Yantis, S., Norwood, M., & Montano, D. E. (1985). Amount of information about the attitude object and attitude-behavior consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1184–1198. [26]
Davidson, D., & Marschak, J. (1959). Experimental tests of a stochastic decision theory. In Churchman, C. W. & Ratoosh, P. (Eds.), Measurement: Definitions and theories (pp. 233–269). New York: Wiley. [2]
Dawes, R. M. (1977). Predictive models as a guide to preference. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-7, 355–358. [33]
Dawes, R. M. (1979). The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. American Psychologist, 34, 571–582. [17]
Dawes, R. M. (1998). Behavioral decision making, judgment, and inference. In Gilbert, D., Fiske, S., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 589–597). Boston: McGraw-Hill. [19]
Bondt, W. F. M., & Thaler, R. H. (1990). Do security analysts overreact?American Economic Review, 80(2), 52–57. [38]
Charms, R. (1968). Personal causation.New York: Academic Press. [16]
Tocqueville, A. (1969). Democracy in America.New York: Harper & Row (Original work published 1830). [16]
Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation.New York: Plenum Press. [16]
Deci, E. L. (1981). The psychology of self-determination.Lexington, MA: Heath. [16]
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior.New York: Plenum Press. [16]
DeKay, M., & McClelland, G. (1996). Probability and utility components of endangered species preservation programs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 60–83. [31, 34]
Delucchi, K. L. (1983). The use and misuse of chi-square: Lewis and Burke revisited. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 166–176. [16]
DeMaio, T. J., & Rothgeb, J. M. (1996). Cognitive interviewing techniques: In the lab and in the field. In Schwarz, N. & Sudman, S. (Eds.), Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communication processes in survey research (pp. 177–195). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. [34]
Dember, W. N., Galinsky, T. L., & Warm, J. S. (1992). The role of choice in vigilance performance. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 201–204. [16]
Dembo, T. (1931). Der Ärger als dynamisches Problem [Anger as a dynamic problem]. Psychologische Forschung, 15, 1–144. [19]
Denes-Raj, V., & Epstein, S. (1994). Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: When people behave against their better judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 819–829. [23]
Desvousges, W. H., Johnson, F. R., Dunford, R. W., Boyle, K. J., Hudson, S. P., & Wilson, K. N. (1992). Measuring nonuse damages using contingent valuation: An experimental evaluation of accuracy (Research Triangle Institute Monograph 92–1).Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute. [1, 9, 31]
Desvousges, W. H., Johnson, F. R., Dunford, R. W., Boyle, K. J., Hudson, S. P., & Wilson, K. N. (1993). Measuring natural resource damages with contingent valuation: Tests of validity and reliability. In Hausman, J. A. (Ed.), Contingent valuation: A critical assessment (pp. 91–164). Amsterdam: North-Holland. [32]
Desvousges, W. H., Smith, V. K., & Fisher, A. (1987). Option price estimates for water quality improvements: A contingent valuation study for the Monongahela River. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 14, 248–267. [33]
Devine, P. C. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18. [15]
Dhar, R. (1997). Consumer preference for a no-choice option. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 215–231. [10, 16]
Dhar, R., & Nowlis, S. M. (1999). The effect of time pressure on consumer choice deferral. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 369–384. [16]
Dhar, R., Nowlis, S. M., & Sherman, S. J. (1999). Comparison effects on preference construction. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 293–306. [28]
Dhar, R., Nowlis, S. M., & Sherman, S. J. (2000). Trying hard or hardly trying: An analysis of context effects in choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9, 189–200. [11]
Dhar, R., & Simonson, I. (2003). The effect of forced choice on choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 40, 146–160. [11]
Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 60–71. [32]
Diamond, P. A. (1996). Testing the internal consistency of contingent valuation surveys. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30, 337–347. [31]
Diamond, P. A., & Hausman, J. A. (1994). Contingent valuation: Is some number better than no number?The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(4), 45–64. [31]
Diamond, P. A., Hausman, J. A., Leonard, G., & Denning, M. (1993). Does contingent valuation measure preferences? Experimental evidence. In Hausman, J. A. (Ed.), Contingent valuation: A critical assessment (pp. 41–85). Amsterdam: North-Holland. [31]
Dickens, W. T., & Katz, L. F. (1987). Inter-industry wage differences and industry characteristics. In Lang, K. & Leonard, J. S. (Eds.), Unemployment and the structure of labor markets (pp. 48–89). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell. [13]
Dickie, M., Fisher, A., & Gerking, S. (1987). Market transactions and hypothetical demand data: A comparative study. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 69–75. [33]
Diederich, A. (1997). Dynamic stochastic models for decision making under time constraints. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41, 260–274. [11]
Diederich, A., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2003). Simple matrix methods for analyzing diffusion models of choice probability, choice response time, and simple response time. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47, 304–322. [11]
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55, 34–43. [28]
Diener, E., Scollon, C. N., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). The evolving concept of subjective well-being: The multifaceted nature of happiness. In Costa, P. T. & Siegler, I. C. (Eds.), Advances in cell aging and gerontology: Vol. 15. Relevant advances in psychology and aging (pp. 187–219). Amsterdam: Elsevier. [28]
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302. [28]
Dougherty, M. R. P., Gettys, C. F., & Ogden, E. E. (1999). MINERVA-DM: A memory processes model for judgments of likelihood. Psychological Review, 106, 180–209. [21]
Dougherty, M. R. P., Gronlund, S. D., & Gettys, C. F. (2003). Memory as a fundamental heuristic for decision making. In Schneider, S. L. & Shanteau, J. (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision making (pp. 125–164). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [21]
Downs, J. S., Murray, P. J., Bruine de Bruin, W., White, J. P., Palmgren, C., & Fischhoff, B. (2004). An interactive video program to reduce adolescent females' STD risk: A randomized controlled trial. Social Science and Medicine, 59, 1561–1572. [35]
Doyle, J. R., O'Connor, D. J., Reynolds, G. M., & Bottomley, P. A. (1999). The robustness of the asymmetrically dominated effect: Buying frames, phantom alternatives, and in-store purchases. Psychology & Marketing, 16, 225–243. [1]
Drolet, A. (1997). Generic preferences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. [17]
Drolet, A., Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (2000). Indifference curves that travel with the choice set. Marketing Letters, 11, 199–209. [13]
Dunn, E. W., Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2003). Location, location, location: The misprediction of satisfaction in housing lotteries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1421–1432. [28]
Dunning, D., Griffin, D. W., Milojkovoc, J., & Ross, L. (1990). The overconfidence effect in social predication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 568–581. [30]
Dutton, D. G., & Aron, A. P. (1974). Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 510–517. [30]
Dworkin, G. (1988). The theory and practice of autonomy.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [38]
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes.Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College. [31]
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1998). Attitude structure and function. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 269–322). Boston: McGraw-Hill. [31]
Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? In David, P. A. & Reder, M. W. (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic Press. [28]
Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. The Economic Journal, 111, 465–484. [28]
Easterlin, R. A. (2003). Building a better theory of well-being (IZA discussion paper).Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor. [28]
Edwards, A. L. (1957). Techniques of attitude scale construction.New York: Appleton-Century-Croft. [23]
Edwards, W. (1953). Probability-preferences in gambling. American Journal of Psychology, 66, 349–364. [1, 2]
Edwards, W. (1954a). Probability-preferences among bets with differing expected values. American Journal of Psychology, 67, 56–67. [1, 2]
Edwards, W. (1954b). The reliability of probability-preferences. American Journal of Psychology, 67, 68–95. [1, 2]
Edwards, W. (1954c). The theory of decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 380–417. [1, 18, 19, 33]
Edwards, W. (1954d). Variance preferences in gambling. American Journal of Psychology, 67, 441–452. [2]
Edwards, W. (1955). The prediction of decisions among bets. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 201–214. [2, 3]
Edwards, W. (1961). Behavioral decision theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 12, 473–498. [1, 33]
Edwards, W. (1962). Subjective probabilities inferred from decisions. Psychological Review, 69, 109–135. [2]
Edwards, W., & Fasolo, B. (2001). Decision technology. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 581–606. [12]
Edwards, W., & Newman, J. R. (1982). Multiattribute evaluation.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. [12]
Edwards, W., & Winterfeldt, D. (1987). Public values in risk debates. Risk Analysis, 7, 141–158. [33]
Einhorn, H. J. (1972). Expert measurement and mechanical combination. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 7, 86–106. [34]
Einhorn, H. J. (1980). Learning from experience and suboptimal rules in decision making. In Wallsten, T. S. (Ed.), Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior (pp. 1–20). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [17]
Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1981). Behavioral decision theory: Processes of judgment and choice. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 53–88. [19, 33]
Eisele, P. (2000). Post-decision consolidation: Group members in different social settings compared to individual decision makers. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 275–282. [19]
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 543–576. [34]
Ellickson, R. C. (1989). Bringing culture and human frailty to rational actors: A critique of classical law and economics. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 65, 23–55. [27]
Elliott, R., & Dolan, R. J. (1998). Neural response during preference and memory judgments for subliminally presented stimuli: A functional neuro-imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 4697–4704. [1, 25]
Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk ambiguity and the Savage axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643–669. [27]
Elster, J., & Loewenstein, G. (1992). Utility from memory and anticipation. In Elster, J. & Loewenstein, G. (Eds.), Choice over time (pp. 213–224). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. [27, 32]
Emanuel, E. E., & Emanuel, L. L. (1992). Four models of the physician-patient relationship. Journal of the American Medical Association, 267, 2221–2226. [36]
Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2001). Putting adjustment back in the anchoring and adjustment heuristic: Differential processing of self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors. Psychological Science, 12, 391–396. [13, 21]
Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709–724. [1, 23, 32]
Erber, M. W., Hodges, S. D., & Wilson, T. D. (1995). Attitude strength and attitude stability. In Petty, R. E. & Krosnick, J. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 433–454). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [26]
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215–251. [10, 18]
Eriksen, C. W. (1980). Discrimination and learning without awareness: A methodological survey and evaluation. Psychological Review, 67, 279–300. [25]
Erwin, P. G., & Calev, A. (1984). The influence of Christian name stereotypes on the marking of children's essays. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 223–227. [23]
Estes, W. K. (1994). Classification and cognition.New York: Oxford University Press. [19]
An ethically defensible market in organs [Editorial]. (2002). British Medical Journal, 325, 114–115. [37]
Fair, R. C. (1978). A theory of extramarital affairs. Journal of Political Economy, 86, 45–61. [5]
Falmagne, J.-C. (1985). Elements of psychophysical theory.New York: Oxford University Press. [6]
Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In Petty, R. E. & Krosnick, J. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247–282). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [23]
Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229–238. [31]
Feldman, J. M., & Lynch, J. G. Jr. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 421–435. [17, 32, 34]
Feldman-Stewart, D., Brundage, M. D., Manen, L., & Svenson, O. (2004). Patient-focused decision making in early-stage prostate cancer: Insights from a cognitively based decision aid. Health Expectations, 7, 126–141. [19]
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. [18, 19, 30]
Festinger, L. (1964). Conflict, decision, and dissonance.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. [12, 19]
Fetherstonhaugh, D., Slovic, P., Johnson, S. M., & Friedrich, J. (1997). Insensitivity to the value of human life: A study of psychophysical numbing. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14, 283–300. [9, 23, 32]
Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1–17. [23, 32]
Fischer, G. W. (1995). Range sensitivity to attribute weights in multiattribute value models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 252–266. [10]
Fischer, G. W., Carmon, Z., Ariely, D., & Zauberman, G. (1999). Goal-based construction of preferences: Task goals and the prominence effect. Management Science, 45, 1057–1075. [1, 21, 28, 29]
Fischer, G. W., Damodaran, N., Laskey, K. B., & Lincoln, D. (1987). Preferences for proxy attributes. Management Science, 33, 198–214. [6, 9]
Fischer, G. W., & Hawkins, S. (1993). Strategy compatibility, scale compatibility, and the prominence effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 580–597. [1, 9, 10, 18, 29]
Fischer, G. W., Jia, J., & Luce, M. F. (2000). Attribute conflict and preference uncertainty: The Rand MAU model. Management Science, 46, 669–684. [11]
Fischer, P. M. (1991). Brand logo recognition by children ages 3 to 6 years: Mickey Mouse and Old Joe the Camel. Journal of the American Medical Association, 266, 3145. [23]
Fischhoff, B. (1975). Hindsight ≢ foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 288–299. [19]
Fischhoff, B. (1980). Clinical decision analysis. Operations Research, 28, 28–43. [35]
Fischhoff, B. (1983). Predicting frames. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 113–116. [1, 21, 35]
Fischhoff, B. (1991). Value elicitation: Is there anything in there?American Psychologist, 46, 835–847. [15, 19, 21, 31, 34, 35]
Fischhoff, B. (1993). Transaction analysis: A framework and an application to insurance decisions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 7, 53–69. [35]
Fischhoff, B. (1996). The real world: What good is it?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 232–248. [19, 35]
Fischhoff, B. (1997). What do psychologists want? Contingent valuation as a special case of asking questions. In Kopp, R. J., Pommerehne, W. W., & Schwartz, N. (Eds.), Determining the value of non-marketed goods: Economic, psychological, and policy relevant aspects of contingent valuation methods (pp. 189–217). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishing. [34]
Fischhoff, B. (2005). Cognitive issues in stated preference methods. In Mäler, K.-G. & Vincent, J. R. (Eds.), Handbook of environmental economics: Vol. 2. Valuing environmental changes (pp. 937–968). Amsterdam: Elsevier. [35]
Fischhoff, B., & Furby, L. (1988). Measuring values: A conceptual framework for interpreting transactions with special reference to contingent valuation of visibility. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 147–184. [33, 34, 35]
Fischhoff, B., Quadrel, M. J., Kamlet, M., Loewenstein, G., Dawes, R. M., Fischbeck, P., et al. (1993). Embedding effects: Stimulus representation and response mode. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 6, 211–234. [33, 34]
Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1978). Fault trees: Sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 330–344. [33]
Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1980). Knowing what you want: Measuring labile values. In Wallstein, T. (Ed.), Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior (pp. 117–141). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [6, 19, 34, 35]
Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., & Combs, B. (1978). How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes toward technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences, 9, 127–152. [23, 35]
Fischhoff, B., Watson, S., & Hope, C. (1984). Defining risk. Policy Sciences, 17, 123–139. [35]
Fischhoff, B., Welch, N., & Frederick, S. (1999). Construal processes in preference assessment. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 139–176. [34]
Fishburn, P. C. (1984). SSB utility theory: An economic perspective. Mathematical Social Sciences, 8, 63–94. [6, 8]
Fishburn, P. C. (1985). Nontransitive preference theory and the preference reversal phenomenon. Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali, 32, 39–50. [1, 6, 8]
Fisher, I. (1906). The nature of capital and income.New York: Macmillan. [2]
Fisher, I. (1968). Is ‘utility’ the most suitable term for the concept it is used to denote? In Page, A. N. (Ed.), Utility theory: A book of readings (pp. 49–51). New York: Wiley (Reprinted from American Economic Review, 8, 335–337, 1918). [27]
Fisher, R. (1969). Basic negotiating strategy: International conflict for beginners.London: Allen Lane. [20]
Fiske, S. T. (1980). Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 889–906. [7]
Fiske, S. T., & Pavelchak, M. A. (1986). Category-based versus piecemeal-based affective responses: Developments in schema-triggered affect. In Sorrentino, R. M. & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), The handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 167–203). New York: Guilford Press. [19]
Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199–210. [6]
Fitzsimons, G. J., & Morwitz, V. G. (1996). The effect of measuring intent on brand-level purchasing behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 23, 1–11. [21]
Florig, H. K., Morgan, M. G., Morgan, K. M., Jenni, K. E., Fischhoff, B., & Fischbeck, P. S., et al. (2001). A test bed for studies of risk taking. Risk Analysis, 21, 913–922. [35]
Ford, J. K., Schmitt, N., Schechtman, S. L., Hults, B. M., & Doherty, M. L. (1986). Process tracing methods: Contribution, problems, and neglected research questions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 75–117. [19]
Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117, 39–66. [21, 30]
Foster, V., Bateman, I. J., & Harley, D. (1997). Real and hypothetical willingness to pay for environmental preservation: A non-experimental comparison. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 48, 123–138. [31]
Fox, C. R., & Tversky, A. (1995). Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 585–603. [9, 13, 14]
Franciosi, R., Kujal, P., Michelitsch, R., & Smith, V. (1993). Experimental tests of the endowment effect (Working paper).Tucson: University of Arizona, Department of Economics. [27]
Frank, R. H. (1992). The role of moral sentiments in the theory of intertemporal choice. In Elster, J. & Loewenstein, G. (Eds.), Choice over time (pp. 265–286). New York: Russell Sage Foundation. [27]
Frank, R. H. (1997). The frame of reference as public good. Economic Journal, 107, 1832–1847. [28]
Franklin, B. (1950). The autobiography of Benjamin Franklin.New York: Pocket Books. [26]
Frederick, S. (2002). Automated choice heuristics. In Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 548–558). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [29, 32]
Frederick, S.