Bibliography

Lucia Rubinelli

doi:10.1017/9781108757119.008

Academie Française. ‘Georges Vedel’. Accessed 1 July 2016. www.academie-francaise.fr/les-immortels/georges-vedel.Google Scholar

Academie Française. ‘Gerard de Lolly Tollendal’. Accessed 15 September 2015. www.academie-francaise.fr/les-immortels/trophime-gerard-de-lallytollendal?fauteuil=31&election=21–03-1816.Google Scholar

Ackermann, B. 1993. We the People: Foundations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ackermann, B. 2000. We the People: Transformations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ahrens, H. 1875 (1830). Cours de droit naturel ou de philosophie du droit. Complété dans les principales matières par des aperçus historiques et politiques. Brockhaus: Leipzig.Google Scholar

Amato, G. 1990. ‘Costantino Mortati e la costituzione italiana. Dalla costituente all’aspettativa mai appagata dell’attuazione costituzionale’. In Galizia, M. and Grossi, P. (eds), Il pensiero giuridico di Costantino Mortati. Milan: Giuffrè, pp. 231–44.Google Scholar

Appleby, J. 1971. ‘America as a model for the radical French reformers of 1789’. The William and Mary Quarterly 292: 267–86.Google Scholar

Arato, A. 1995. ‘Forms of constitution-making and theories of democracy’. Cardozo Law Review 17: 191–230.Google Scholar

Arato, A. 2000. Civil Society, Constitution and Legitimacy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Arato, A. 2016. Post-sovereign Constitution Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Arato, A. 2017. The Adventures of the Constituent Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Arato, A. 2018. ‘Revolution, anti imperialism and learning’. http://blogs.law.columbia.edu/uprising1313/andrew-arato-revolution-anti-imperialism-and-learning/.Google Scholar

Arato, A., and Cohen, J.. 2009. ‘Banishing the sovereign? Internal and external sovereignty in Arendt’. Constellations 16(2): 307–30.CrossRef Google Scholar

Arendt, H. 1945. ‘Parties, movements and classes’. Partisan Review 12(4): 504–13.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. 1946 (January). ‘The Nation’. The Review of Politics 8(1): 138–41.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. 1960. ‘Freedom and politics: a lecture’. Chicago Review 14(1): 28–46.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. 1961. ‘What is freedom?’. In Between Past and Future. New York: The Viking Press, pp. 143–72.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. 1970. On Violence. New York: Harvest Book.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. 1973 (1951). The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harvest Book.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. 1994 (1970). ‘The nation’. In Arendt, H., Essays in Understanding. New York: Schocken Books, pp. 206–11.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. 1998 (1958). The Human Condition. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. 2006 (1963). On Revolution. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. 2007. ‘Between silence and speechlessness: articles from Aufbau: February 1943–March 1944’. In Arendt, H., The Jewish Writings. New York: Schocken Books, pp. 186–98.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. 2007. ‘Peace or Armistice in the Near East?’. In Arendt, H., The Jewish Writings. New York: Schocken Books, pp. 423–50.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. 2007. ‘The failure of reason: the mission of Bernadotte’. In Arendt, H., The Jewish Writings. New York: Schocken Books, pp. 408–13.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. 2007. ‘The Jewish State: Fifty Years After, Where have Herzl’s Politics Led?’. In Arendt, H., The Jewish Writings. New York: Schocken Books, pp. 375–86.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. 2007. The Jewish Writings. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. 2007. ‘The minority question’. In Arendt, H., The Jewish Writings. New York: Schocken Books, pp. 125–33.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. 2007. ‘To Save the Jewish Homeland’. In Arendt, H., The Jewish Writings. New York: Schocken Books, pp. 388–401.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. 2007. ‘Zionism reconsidered’. In Arendt, H., The Jewish Writings. New York: Schocken Books, pp. 343–74.Google Scholar

Ashcroft, C. 2017. ‘Jewishness and the problem of nationalism: a genealogy of Arendt’s early political thought’. Modern Intellectual History 14(2): 421–29.Google Scholar

Avocat, E. 2008. ‘Sieyès orateur à l’Assemblée Constituante. Aventures et mésaventures rhétoriques de la langue philosophique’. In Quiviger, Y., Denis, V. and Salem, J. (eds), Figures de Sieyès. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne, pp. 159–76.Google Scholar

Backzo, B. 1988. ‘The Social Contract of the French: Sieyès and Rousseau’. The Journal of Modern History 60: 98–125.Google Scholar

Baehr, P. 1997. Caesar and the Fading of the Roman World: A Study in Republicanism and Caesarism. London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Baker, K. M. 1990. Inventing the French Revolution: Essays on French Political Culture in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Baker, K. M. 1989. ‘Representation Redefined’. In Colin, L. (ed.), The French Revolution and the Creation of Modern Political Culture. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 224–51.Google Scholar

Bastid, P. 1939. Sieyès et sa pensée. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar

Bastid, P. 1948. Un juriste pamphlétaire: Cormenin, précurseur et constituant de 1848. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar

Beaud, O. 1994. La puissance de l’État. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Beiner, R. 2000. ‘Arendt and nationalism’. In Villa, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 44–62.Google Scholar

Bendersky, J. W. 1983. Carl Schmitt: Theorist for the Reich. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Berriat-Saint-Prix, F. 1852. Commentaire sur la Charte Constitutionnelle. Paris: Videcoq.Google Scholar

Berriat-Saint-Prix, F. 1851–3. Théorie du droit constitutionnel français, esprit des constitutions de 1848 et de 1852 et des sénatus-consultes organiques précédé d’un essai sur le pouvoir constituant et d’un précis historique des constitutions françaises. Paris: Videcoq Fils.Google Scholar

Block, M. 1873. Dictionnaire générale de la Politique. Paris: O. Lorenz.Google Scholar

Bluntschli, K. 1834. Das Volk und der Souverän im allgemeinen betrachtet und mit besondere Rücksicht auf die Schweizerischen Verhältnisse. Zurich: Drell.Google Scholar

Bluntschli, K. 1876. Lehre vom modernen Staat. Stuttgart: J. C. Cotta.Google Scholar

Bluntschli, K. 1895. The Modern State. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Böckenförde, E-W., 1974. Verfassungsfragen der Richterwahl: dargestellt anhand der Gesetzentwürfe zur Einführung der Richterwahl in Nordrhein-Westfalen. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar

Böckenförde, E-W. 1983. ‘Geschichtliche Entwicklung und Bedeutungswandel der Verfassung’. In Buschmann, A. (ed.), Festschrift für Rudolf Gmür. Bielefeld: Gieseking, pp. 7–19.Google Scholar

Böckenförde, E. W. 1994 (1986). ‘Die verfassunggebende Gewalt des Volkes – Ein Grenzbegriff des Verfassungsrechts’. In Preuss, H. and Böckenförde, E-W. (eds.), Zum Begriff der Verfassung: die Ordnung des Politischen. Frankfurt: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, pp. 58–77.Google Scholar

Böckenförde, E. W. 1996. ‘Carl Schmitt Revisited’. Telos 109: 81–6.Google Scholar

Böckenförde, E. W. 1998. ‘The Concept of the Political: A Key to Understanding Carl Schmitt’s Constitutional Theory’. In Dyzenhaus, D. (ed.), Law as Politics: Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberalism (Durham: Duke University Press), pp. 37–55.Google Scholar

Böckenförde, E. W. 2006. ‘Mutamento e significato della costituzione’. In Böckenförde, E-W. (ed.), Stato, costituzione, democrazia. Milan: Giuffrè, 29–60.Google Scholar

Böckenförde, E. W. 2007. Der säkularisierte Staat: Sein Charakter, seine Rechtfertigung und seine Probleme im 21. Jahrhundert. Munich: Carl Friedrich von Siemens Stiftung.Google Scholar

Böckenförde, E. W. 2017. Constitutional and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Böckenförde, E. W. 2017 (1984). ‘The Historical Evolution and Changes in the Meaning of the Constitution’. In Böckenförde, E-W., Constitutional and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 152–168.Google Scholar

Böckenförde, E. W. 2017 (1986). ‘The Constituent Power of the People’. In Böckenförde, E-W., Constitutional and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 169–185.CrossRef Google Scholar

Böckenförde, E. W. 2017 (1997). ‘The Concept and Problems of the Constitutional State’. In Böckenförde, E-W., Constitutional and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 141–151.Google Scholar

Böckenförde, E. W. 2017 (1999). “Constitutional Jurisdiction. Structure, Organization, and Legitimation’. In Böckenförde, E-W., Constitutional and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 186–207.Google Scholar

Bonald, L. 1819. Mélanges littéraires, politiques et philosophiques. Paris: A. Leclère.Google Scholar

Bonald, L. 1820. Démonstration philosophique du principe constitutif de la société. Paris: A. Leclère.Google Scholar

Bonhomme, J. 1873. Ni Monarchie, ni république. Honnêteté. Dissolution. Pouvoir constituant. Suffrage universel. Paris: Lachaud Editeur.Google Scholar

Bredin, J. D. 1988. Sieyès la clé de la Révolution Française. Paris: Editions de Fallois.Google Scholar

Breuer, S. 1984. ‘Nationalstaat und pouvoir constituant bei Sieyès und Carl Schmitt’. Archiv für Rechts und Sozialphilosophie 70(4): 495–517.Google Scholar

C. A. B. 1909. ‘Die Lehre vom Pouvoir Constituant’. Political Science Quarterly 24(3): 522–3.Google Scholar

Canovan, M. 1994. Hannah Arendt: A Reinterpretation of her Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Canovan, M. 2000. ‘Arendt and nationalism’. In Villa, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 44–62.Google Scholar

Carrozza, P. 2008. ‘Constitutionalism’s post-modern opening’. In Loughlin, M. and Walker, N. (eds), The Paradox of Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 169–87.Google Scholar

Chavegrin, M. 1900. Le pouvoir constituant. Paris.Google Scholar

Clapham, J. H. 1912. The Abbé Sieyès: an Essay in the Politics of the French Revolution. London: P. S. King & Son.Google Scholar

Clavreul, C. 1982. Influences de la théorie d’Emmanuel-Joseph Sieyès sur les origines de la représentation en droit public. Thesis. Université de Paris 1-Panthéon-Sorbonne.Google Scholar

Clavreul, C. 1986. ‘Sieyès et la genèse de la représentation moderne’, Droits. Revue française de théorie juridique 6: 45–56.Google Scholar

Clermont-Tonnere, S. 1791. Analyse raisonnée de la constitution française. Paris.Google Scholar

Constant, B. 1957. ‘Fragments des mémoires de madame Récamier’. In Œuvres. Paris: Gallimard, pp. 965–6.Google Scholar

Constant, B. 1982 (1818–29). Cours de politique constitutionnelle. Vol. 1. Paris and Geneva: Slatkine.Google Scholar

Constant, B. 1988 (1915). ‘Principles of politics applicable to all representative governments’. In Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 170–307.Google Scholar

Constant, B. 1989 (1929). Positions de combat à la vieille de juillet 1830. Articles publiés dans ‘le Temps’, 1829–1830. Geneva: Slatkine.Google Scholar

Constant, B. 1997. Écrits politiques. Edited by Gauchet, M.. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Conti, G. 2019 (July). ‘“L’âme générale d’une assemblée”: A Neglected Parliamentarian and the Restoration Theory of Representation’. Global Intellectual History, online first.Google Scholar

Conti, G. 2019. Parliament the Mirror of the Nation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

de Cormenin, M. 1832. Cinq lettres de M. de Cormenin sur la Charte, la pairie et le pouvoir constituant. Paris: Setier.Google Scholar

Crăiuțu, A. 2012. A Virtue for Courageous Minds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Cramer, C. F. 1794. Sieyès Schriften: Versuch über die Vorrechte und Was ist der Bürgerstand? Leipzig-Altona.Google Scholar

Cramer, C. F. 1796. Collection des écrits d’E. Sieyès à l’usage de l’Allemagne. Paris.Google Scholar

Cristi, R. 1997. ‘Carl Schmitt on sovereignty and constituent power’. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 10(1): 189–201.Google Scholar

Cristi, R. 2011. ‘Schmitt on constituent power and the monarchical principle’. Constellations 18(3): 352–64.Google Scholar

Delarue, F. 1831. Du Pouvoir constituant et du principe souverain d’après M. de Cormenin au sujet de la Charte de 1830. Paris: Levavasseur.Google Scholar

Della Cananea, G. 2003. ‘Mortati and the science of public law: a comment on La Torre’. In Joerghes, C. and Ghaleigh, N.S., Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and its Legal Traditions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 305–20.Google Scholar

Del Lucchese, F. 2014. ‘Machiavelli and constituent power: the revolutionary foundation of modern political thought’. European Journal of Political Theory 16(1): 1–21.Google Scholar

Del Lucchese, F. 2016. ‘Spinoza and constituent power’. Contemporary Political Theory 15(2): 182–204.Google Scholar

Delos, J. T. 1944. La Nation. Montreal: Editions de l’Arbre.Google Scholar

Derré, J. R. 1962. Lamennais et ses amis et le mouvement des idées à l’époque romantique, 1824–1834. Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck.Google Scholar

Disch, L. 2011. ‘How could Hannah Arendt glorify the American Revolution and revile the French? Placing On Revolution in the historiography of the French and American Revolutions’. European Journal of Political Theory 10(3): 350–71.Google Scholar

Dufour, G. 1848. ‘Du pouvoir exécutif’. Revue de législation et de jurisprudence: 1.131–142.Google Scholar

Durelle-Marc, Y.-A. 2009. ‘Jean-Denis Lanjuinais, juriste et parlementaire (1753–1827): une biographie politique’. Parlement[s], Revue d’histoire politique 1(11): 8–24.Google Scholar

Durelle-Marc, Y.-A. 2015. ‘Le stoïcisme de Firmin Laferrière (1798–1861)’. Revue Française d’Histoire des Idées Politiques 41(2): 161–84.Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, D. 2019. ‘Introduction: The Problem of Sovereignty’. In Heller, H., Sovereignty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–59.Google Scholar

Ebel, J. G. (ed. and trans). 1796. Sieyès: Politische Schriften. Leipzig: Gabler’sche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar

Egret, J. 1950. La révolution des notables : Mounier et les monarchiens, 1789. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar

Elster, J. 1995. ‘Forces and mechanisms in the constitution-making process’. Duke Law Journal 2(45): 364–96.Google Scholar

Elster, J. 2000. ‘Arguing and bargaining in two constituent assemblies’. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 2(2): 345–421.Google Scholar

Elster, J. 2013. Securities against Misrule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fauré, C. 1988. Les Déclarations des droits de l’homme de 1789. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar

Fauré, C. 2008. ‘Sieyès, Rousseau et la théorie du contrat’. In Quiviger, Y., Denis, V. and Salem, J. (eds), Figures de Sièyes. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne, pp. 213–26.Google Scholar

Fioravanti, M. 1990. ‘Dottrina dello Stato-persona e dottrina della costituzione – Costantino Mortati e la tradizione giuspubblicistica italiana’. In Galizia, M. and Grossi, P. (eds), Il Pensiero Giuridico di Costantino Mortati. Milan: Giuffrè, pp. 45–186.Google Scholar

Fioravanti, M. 2007. ‘Sieyès et le jury constitutionnaire: perspectives historico-juridiques’. Annales historiques de la Révolution française 3(349): 87–193.Google Scholar

Fontana, B. 1991. Benjamin Constant and the Post-revolutionary Mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Forsyth, M. 1981. ‘Thomas Hobbes and the constituent power of the people’. Political Studies 2: 191–203.Google Scholar

Forsyth, M. 1987. Reason and Revolution: The Political Thought of the Abbé Sieyès. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar

Frank, J. 2010. Constituent Moments: Enacting the People in Post-revolutionary America. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Furet, F. 1978. Penser la révolution française. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Furet, F. and Halevi, R.. 1989. Orateurs de la révolution française: Les constituants. Vol. 1. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Galizia, M., and Grossi, P.. 1990. Il pensiero giuridico di Costantino Mortati. Milan: Giuffrè.Google Scholar

Gallois, L. 1825. Biographie de tous les ministres : depuis la constituante de 1792 jusqu’à nos jours. Paris.Google Scholar

Garsten, B. 2016. ‘From popular sovereignty to civil society in post-revolutionary France’. In Skinner, Q. and Bourke, R. (eds), Popular Sovereignty in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 236–69.Google Scholar

Geenes, R., et al. 2015. ‘The co-originality of constituent power and representation’. Constellations 22(4): 514–22.Google Scholar

Ghins, A. 2018. ‘Benjamin Constant and the politics of reason’. History of European Ideas, online first.Google Scholar

Ghins, A. 2019. ‘Benjamin Constant and public opinion in post-revolutionary France’. History of Political Thought 40(3): 484–514.Google Scholar

Godechot, J. 1970. Les Constitutions de la France depuis 1789. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar

Goldoni, M. 2009. La dottrina costituzionale di Sieyès. Florence: Firenze University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Goldoni, M. 2012. ‘At the origins of the constitutional review: Sieyès’ constitutional jury and the taming of constituent power’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 2: 211–34.Google Scholar

Gregorio, M. 2017. ‘V. E. Orlando costituente’. Nomos: le attualità nel diritto 3: 1–12.Google Scholar

Gueniffey, P. 1994. ‘Constitution et intérêts sociaux: le débat sur les deux chambres’. In Troper, M. and Jaume, L. (eds), 1789 et l’invention de la Constitution en France. Paris: Libraire générale de droit et de jurisprudence.Google Scholar

Gueniffey, P. 2015. Bonaparte 1769–1802. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Guilhaumou, J. 1989. La langue politique et la Révolution française : de l’événement à la raison linguistique. Paris: Méridiens Klincksieck.Google Scholar

Guilhaumou, J. 1993. ‘Sieyès, lecteur critique de l’article « Évidence » de l’Encyclopédie (1773)’. Recherches sur Diderot et sur l’Encyclopédie. 14: 125–43.Google Scholar

Guilhaumou, J. 1998. L’avènement des porte-parole de la République (1789–1792): essai de synthèse sur les langages de la Révolution française. Paris: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar

Guilhaumou, J. 2002. Sieyès et l’ordre de la langue: L’invention de la politique moderne. Paris: Kliné.Google Scholar

Guizot, F. 1820. Du gouvernement de la France depuis la Restauration et du ministère actuel. Paris.Google Scholar

Guizot, F. 1837 (November). ‘De la démocratie dans les sociétés modernes’. Revue française.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 2012. The Crisis of the European Union: A Response. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Halpérin, J. L. 2011. ‘Laboulaye, historien du droit et/ou comparatiste’, Revue internationale de droit comparé 63(3): 517–25.Google Scholar

Hazareesingh, S. 1998. From Subject to Citizen. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hazareesingh, S. 2004. The Saint-Napoleon: Celebrations of Sovereignty in 19th Century France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hazareesingh, S. 2004. The Legend of Napoleon. London: Granta.Google Scholar

Heller, H. 2019. Sovereignty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hewitson, M. 2000. National Identity and Political Thought in Germany: Wilhelmine Depictions of the French Third Republic 1890–1914. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

His, E. 1920. Geschichte des Neueren Schweizerischen Staatsrechts. Basel: Helbing & Lichtenhahn.Google Scholar

Hont, I. 2004. ‘The permanent crisis of a divided mankind: nation state and nationalism in historical perspective’. Political Studies (XLII): 166–231.Google Scholar

Jacobson, A., and Schlink, B.. 2000. ‘Introduction’. In Jacobson, A. and Schlink, B. (eds), Weimar: A Jurisprudence of Crisis. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 1–39.Google Scholar

Jardin, A. 1985. Histoire du libéralisme politique de la crise de l’absolutisme à la Constitution de 1875. Paris: Hachette Littérature.Google Scholar

Jay, M. 1985. Permanent Exiles: Essays on the Intellectual Migration from Germany to America. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Jaume, L. 1989. Le discours jacobin et la démocratie. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar

Jaume, L. 1997. L’Individu effacé. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar

Jaume, L. 2002. ‘Sieyès et le sens du jury constitutionnaire: une réinterprétation’. Droits XVIII 2(36): 115–34.Google Scholar

Jaume, L. 2008. ‘Constituent power in France: the revolution and its consequences’. In Loughlin, M. and Walker, N. (eds), The Paradox of Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 67–85.Google Scholar

Jellinek, G. 1901. The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizens. New York: Holt.Google Scholar

Jouanjan, O. 2018. ‘Between Carl Schmitt, the Catholic Church and Herman Heller: on the foundations of democratic theory in the work of Ernst-Wolfgang Böckenförde’, Constellations 25: 184–95.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jurkevics, A. 2015. ‘Hannah Arendt reads Carl Schmitt’s The Nomos of the Earth: a dialogue on law and geopolitics from the margins’, European Journal of Political Theory 6(3): 345–66.Google Scholar

Kalyvas, A. 2000. ‘Hegemonic sovereignty: Carl Schmitt, Antonio Gramsci and the constituent prince’. Journal of Political Ideologies 5(3): 343–76.Google Scholar

Kalyvas, A. 2005. ‘Popular sovereignty, democracy and the constituent power’. Constellations 12(2): 223–44.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kalyvas, A. 2009. Democracy and the Politics of the Extraordinary: Max Weber, Carl Schmitt and Hannah Arendt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kalyvas, A. 2012. ‘Constituent power’. In Political concepts. Accessed 24 July 2016. www.politicalconcepts.org/constituentpower/.Google Scholar

Kateb, G. 1983. ‘Arendt and representative democracy’. Salmagundi 20: 20–50.Google Scholar

Kateb, G. 2000. ‘Political action: its nature and advantages’. In Villa, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 130–48.Google Scholar

Keedus, L. 2011. ‘Human and nothing but human: how Schmittian is Hannah Arendt’s critique of human rights?’ History of European Ideas 37(2): 190–6.Google Scholar

Kelly, D. 2004. ‘Carl Schmitt’s theory of political representation’. Journal of the History of Ideas 65(1): 113–34.Google Scholar

Kelly, D. 2004. ‘Revisiting the rights of man: Georg Jellinek on rights and the state’. Law and History Review 22(3): 493–529.Google Scholar

Kelly, D. 2014. ‘Egon Zweig and the intellectual history of constituent power’. In Grotke, K. L. and Prutsch, M. J. (eds), Constitutionalism, Legitimacy and Power: Nineteenth-Century Experiences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 332–50.Google Scholar

Kelly, D. 2016. ‘Popular sovereignty as state theory in the nineteenth century’. In Skinner, Q. and Bourke, R. (eds), Popular Sovereignty in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 270–96.Google Scholar

Kelly, A., and Grabaud, S.. 2007. The Humane Comedy: Constant, Tocqueville, and French Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kelsen, H. 1920. Das problem der souveränität und die theorie des völkerrechts. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar

Kelsen, H. 1997 (1934). Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory. Translated by Paulson, B. L. and Paulson, S. L.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Kelsen, H. 2005 (1934). Pure Theory of Law. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Kennedy, E. 1997. ‘Hostis non inimicus: towards a theory of the public in the work of Carl Schmitt’. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 10(1): 35–47.Google Scholar

Kershaw, I. (ed.). 1990. Weimar: Why Did German Democracy Fail? London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar

King, N, and Hofmann, E.. 1988. ‘Les lettres de Benjamin Constant à Sieyès avec une lettre de Constant à Pictet-Diodati’. Annales Benjamin Constant 3: 89–110.Google Scholar

Klein, C. 1994. Théorie et pratique du pouvoir constituant. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Klusmeyer, D. 2009. ‘Hannah Arendt’s case for federalism’. Publius: the Journal of Federalism 40(1): 31–58.Google Scholar

Kunkler, M., and Stein, T.. 2017. ‘Introduction’. In Böckenforde, E-W., Constitutional and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kunkler, M., and Stein, T.. 2018. ‘Carl Schmitt in Ernst-Wolfgang Böckenforde’s work: carrying Weimar constitutional theory into the Bonn Republic’. Constellations 25: 225–41.Google Scholar

La Torre, M. 2003. ‘The German impact on Fascist public law doctrine’. In Joerghes, C. and Ghaleigh, N.S. (eds), Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and its Legal Traditions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Laboulaye, E. 1851. La révision de la constitution: lettre à un ami. Paris: A. Durand.Google Scholar

Laboulaye, E. 1871. ‘Pouvoir Constituant’. La Revue des Deux Mondes (1 septembre): 791–1014.Google Scholar

Laferrière, F. 1838–9. ‘Cours de droit public et administratif, par M. F. Laferrière, Professeur à la faculté de droit de Rennes’. Revue de Legislation et de jurisprudence 9: 360.Google Scholar

Laferrière, F. 1839. Cours théorique et pratique de droit public et administrative. Paris: Cotillon Editeur.Google Scholar

Lahmer, M. 2008. ‘Sieyès lors de débats constituants en l’an III: autopsie d’un échec’. In Quiviger, Y., Denis, V. and Salem, J. (eds), Figures de Sièyes. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne, pp. 43–82.Google Scholar

Lamennais, F. R. 1826. De la religion considérée dans ses rapports avec l’ordre politique et civil. Paris: Lachevardière Fils.Google Scholar

Lanchester, F. 2012. ‘Constantino Mortati’. Dizionario Biografico degli Italiani 77. Accessed 1 July 2016. www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/costantino-napoleone-mortati_(Dizionario-Biografico)/.Google Scholar

Lanjuinais, J. D. 1819. Constitutions de la nation francaise: avec un essai de traité historique et politique sur la charte et un recueil de pièces corrélatives. Paris: Baouduoin Frères.Google Scholar

Lanjuinais, J. D. 1820. Examen du système de M. Flaugergues établissant la dictature du roi et des chambres ou leur pouvoir de changer la constitution sans observer aucunes formes spéciales. Paris: Bauduoin Frères.Google Scholar

Lee, D. 2016. Popular Sovereignty in Early Modern Constitutional Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Le Peuple constituant. 1848 (27 février–11 juillet).Google Scholar

Lindhal, H. 2008. ‘Constituent Power and Reflexive Identity: Towards an Ontology of Collective Selfhood’. In Loughlin, M. and Walker, N. (eds), The Paradox of Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 9–24.Google Scholar

Loughlin, M. 2004. The Idea of Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Loughlin, M. 2010. Foundations of Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Loughlin, M. 2014. ‘The concept of constituent power’. European Journal of Political Theory 13(2): 218–37.Google Scholar

Loughlin, M., and Walker, N.. 2008. The Paradox of Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Madival, J., Laurent, E. et al. 1862. Archives Parlementaires de 1789 à 1860: recueil complet des débats législatifs & politiques des Chambres françaises. Vol. 8. Paris: Librairie administrative de P. Dupont.Google Scholar

Maistre, J. de. 1814. Essai sur le principe générateur des constitutions politiques et des autres institutions humaines. Paris: Société Typographique.Google Scholar

Markell, P. 2006. ‘The rule of the people: Arendt, archê, and democracy’, American Political Science Review 100(1): 1–14.Google Scholar

Mattei, U., and Bailey, S.. 2013. ‘Social movements as constituent power: the Italian struggle for the commons’. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20(2): 965–1013.Google Scholar

Maulin, E. 2002. ‘Carré de Malberg et le droit constitutionnel de la Révolution française’. Annales historiques de la Révolution française 328: 5–25.Google Scholar

Merriam, C. 1900. History of the Theory of Sovereignty since Rousseau. New York: University of Columbia Press.Google Scholar

Mehring, R. 2014. Carl Schmitt: a Biography. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Meurthe, Boulay de la. 1836. Théorie constitutionnelle de Sieyès et Constitution de l’an VIII. Paris: Paul Renouard.Google Scholar

Möllers, C. 2008. ‘We are (afraid of) the people: constituent power in German constitutionalism’. In Loughlin, M. and Walker, N. (eds), The Paradox of Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 87–105.Google Scholar

Mommsen, H. 2007. The Rise and Fall of Weimar Democracy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Mommsen, T. 2010 (1871). The History of Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mortati, C. 1946. ‘Appunti sul problema della fonte del potere costituente’. Rassegna di diritto pubblico 1: 26–53.Google Scholar

Mortati, C. 1946. ‘Il potere legislativo: unicamerale o bicamerale?’. Realtà politica 8(2): 104–6.Google Scholar

Mortati, C. 1959. La persona, lo stato e le comunità intermedie. Cuneo: Edizioni RAI.Google Scholar

Mortati, C. 1960. ‘Significato del referendum’. Rassegna parlamentare: 60–6.Google Scholar

Mortati, C. 1962. ‘Costituzione dello stato’. In Enciclopedia del diritto. Vol. 11. Milan: Giuffrè.Google Scholar

Mortati, C. 1969 (1949). Istituzioni di diritto pubblico. Padua: Cedam.Google Scholar

Mortati, C. 1972. Studi sul potere costituente e sulla riforma costituzionale dello Stato. Vol. 1. Milan: Giuffrè.Google Scholar

Mortati, C. 1973. ‘Brevi note sul rapporto fra costituzione e politica nel pensiero di Carl Schmitt’, Quaderni fiorentini per la storia del pensiero giuridico moderno 2: 511–32.Google Scholar

Mortati, C. 1998 (1940). La costituzione in senso materiale. Milan: Giuffrè.Google Scholar

Mounier, J. J. 1792. Recherches sur les causes qui ont empêché les Français de devenir libres et sur les moyens qui leur restent pour acquérir la liberté. Paris.Google Scholar

Mounier, J. J. 1989. ‘Sur la sanction royale’. In Furet, F. and Halévi, R. (eds), Orateurs de la Révolution française, I: Les Constituants. Paris: Gallimard, p. 895.Google Scholar

Moyn, S. 2008. ‘Hannah Arendt on the secular’. New German Critique 105: 71–96.Google Scholar

Muldoon, J. 2011. ‘The lost treasure of Arendt’s Council System’, Critical Horizons 12(3): 396–417.Google Scholar

Muldoon, J. 2016. ‘The origins of Hannah Arendt’s council system’, History of Political Thought 37(4): 761–89.Google Scholar

Müller, J. W. 2003. A Dangerous Mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Negri, A. 1999. Insurgencies: Constituent Power and the Modern State. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Negri, A. 2003. Guide: cinque lezioni su impero e dintorni. Milan: Raffaello Cortina Editore.Google Scholar

Negri, A., and Hardt, M.. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Negri, A., and Hardt, M.. 2005. Multitudes: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. Boston: Penguin.Google Scholar

Nicoletti, M., and Brino, O.. 2006. ‘Presentazione’. In Bockenforde, E.-W., Stato, Costituzione, Democrazia. Milan: Giuffrè, pp. v–xlii.Google Scholar

Niesen, P. 2017. ‘Reframing civil disobedience: constituent power as a language of transnational protest’. Journal of Common Market Studies 55(2): 183–92.Google Scholar

Niesen, P. 2017. ‘The “mixed” constituent legitimacy of the European Federation’. Journal of Common Market Studies 55(2): 183–92.Google Scholar

Niesen, P. 2019. ‘Resistance, disobedience, or constituent power? Emerging narratives of transnational protest’. Journal of International Political Theory 15(1).Google Scholar

Nippel, W. 2011. ‘Carl Schmitts “kommissarische” und “souveräne” Diktatur: Französische Revolution und römische Vorbilder’. In Bluhm, H. et al. (eds), Ideenpolitik: Geschichtliche Konstellationen und gegenwärtige Konflikte. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 105–39.Google Scholar

Oelsner, C. E. 1796. Sieyès Politische Schriften vollständig gesammelt von dem deutschen Übersetzer nebst zwei Vorreden über Sieyès Lebensgeschichte, seine politische Rolle, seinen Charakter, seine Schriften.Google Scholar

Orlando, V. E. 1889. Principi di diritto costituzionale. Florence: G. Barbara.Google Scholar

Pasquino, P. 1988. ‘Die Lehre vom Pouvoir Constituant bei Abbé Sieyes und Carl Schmitt: ein Beitrag zur Untersuchung der Grundlagen der modernen Demokratietheorie’. In Quaritsch, H. (ed.), Complexio Oppositorium: Uber Carl Schmitt. Berlin: Dunker und Humboldt, pp. 371–385.Google Scholar

Pasquino, P. 1998. Sieyes et l’invention de la constitution en France. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar

Pasquino, P. 2008. ‘Constitution et pouvoir constituant: le double corps du peuple’. In Quiviger, Y., Denis, V. and Salem, J. (ed.), Figures de Sièyes. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne, pp. 227–40.Google Scholar

Pasquino, P. 2013. ‘Classifying constitutions: preliminary conceptual analysis’. Cardozo Law Review 34: 999–1019.Google Scholar

Patberg, M. 2017. ‘A systematic justification for the EU’s pouvoir constituant mixte: principles of constitutional politics in supranational polities’. European Law Journal 23(6): 441–53.Google Scholar

Patberg, M. 2017. ‘Constituent power: a discourse-theoretical solution to the conflict between openness and containment. Constellations 24(1): 51–62.Google Scholar

Patberg, M. 2018. ‘Challenging the masters of the treaties: emerging narratives of constituent power in the European Union’. Global Constitutionalism 7(2): 263–93.Google Scholar

Pettit, P. 2012. On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Peukert, D. J. K. 1993. The Weimar Republic. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Pinheiro-Ferreira, S. 1830. Cours de droit public interne et externe. Paris: Imprimerie de Casimir.Google Scholar

Pitkin, H. 1998. The Attack of the Blob: Hannah Arendt’s Concept of the Social. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Prémontrés, District de. 1989. ‘Lettre du district de Prémontrés du 18 novembre 1789’. In Jaume, L. (ed.), Le discours jacobin et la démocratie. Paris: Fayard pp. 289–290.Google Scholar

Preuss, U. K. 1992–3. ‘Constitutional power making for the New Polity: some deliberations on the relations between constituent power and the constitution’. Cardozo Law Review 14: 639–60.Google Scholar

Price, M. 2007. The Perilous Crown: France between Revolutions, 1814–1848. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Quiviger, Y. 2008. ‘Sieyès et Spinoza’. In Quiviger, Y., Denis, V. and Salem, J. (eds), Figures de Sièyes. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne, pp. 227–40.Google Scholar

Carré de Malberg, R., de. 2004 (1920). Contribution à la Théorie générale de l’État. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar

Recueil de documents relatifs à la campagne électorale pour les élections à l’Assemble constituante. 1848. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale. Available at: http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k1019609.r=assemblée+constituante+1848.langFR.Google Scholar

Redslob, R. 1912. Die Staatstheorien der französischen Nationalversammlung von 1789. Leipzig: Verlag von Veit & Comp.Google Scholar

Robert, A., Bourloton, E. and Cougny, G.. 1891. Dictionnaire des parlementaires français, depuis le 1er mai 1789 jusqu’au 1er mai 1889. Paris: Bourloton.Google Scholar

Roberts, J. M., and Cobb, R. C.. 1966. French Revolution Documents. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Robespierre, M. 1910. ‘Discussion du Projet de constitution, 10 aout 1791’. In Œuvres de Robespierre. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Robespierre, M. 1910. ‘Sur le droit de vote, 22 octobre 1789’. In Œuvres de Robespierre. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Rosanvallon, P. 1994. La monarchie impossible : les chartes de 1814 et 1830. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar

Rosanvallon, P. 1995. ‘Guizot et la Révolution française’. In Valensise, M. (ed.), F. Guizot et la culture politique de son temps : colloque de la fondation Guizot-Val Racher. Paris: EHESS, pp. 59–67Google Scholar

Rosanvallon, P. 1995. ‘The history of the word democracy in France’. The Journal of Democracy 3(4): 140–54.Google Scholar

Rosanvallon, P. 2000. La Démocratie inachevée. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Roussel, J. 1972. Jean Jacques Rousseau en France après la Révolution : 1795–1830. Paris: A. Collin.Google Scholar

Rubin, G. 2015. ‘From federalism to binationalism: Hannah Arendt’s shifting Zionism’. Contemporary European History 24(3): 393–414.Google Scholar

Rubinelli, L. 2017. ‘Taming sovereignty: constituent power in nineteenth century French political thought’. History of European Ideas 44(1): pp. 60–74.Google Scholar

Rubinelli, L. 2018. ‘Of postmen and democracy’. In Marquez, X. (ed.), Democratic Moments. London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 97–105.Google Scholar

Rubinelli, L. 2019. ‘How to think beyond sovereignty: Emmanuel Sieyès on constituent power’. European Journal of Political Theory 18(1): 1–21.Google Scholar

Rubinelli, L. 2019. ‘Sieyès versus bicameralism’. The Review of Politics 81(2): 255–79.Google Scholar

Rubinelli, L. 2019. ‘Costantino Mortati and the idea of material constitution’. History of Political Thought. 40(3): 515–546.Google Scholar

Rubinelli, L. forthcoming. ‘Parties, elites and democracy in the Italian Constituent Assembly, 1946–1947’. Constellations.Google Scholar

Sainte Beauve, C. 1851. Les Causeries du Lundi. Vol. 5. Paris: Garnier-Freres.Google Scholar

Scheuerman, W. E. 1997. ‘Revolution and constitution: Hannah Arendt’s challenge to Carl Schmitt’. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 10(141): 141–61.Google Scholar

Schmitt, C. 1914. Der Wert des Staates und die Bedeutung des Einzelnen. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar

Schmitt, C. 1988 (1926). The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Schmitt, C. 2001. State, Movement, People. Corvallis, OR: Plutarch Press.Google Scholar

Schmitt, C. 2004 (1932). Legality and Legitimacy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Schmitt, C. 2005 (1922). Political Theology. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Schmitt, C. 2007 (1927). The Concept of the Political. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Schmitt, C. 2008 (1928). Constitutional Theory. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Schmitt, C. 2013 (1921). Dictatorship. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Schmitt, C. 2014 (1927). Volksentscheid und Volksbegehren. Ein Beitrag zur Auslegung der Weimarer Verfassung und zur Lehre von der unmittelbaren Demokratie. Berlin: Duncker & Humboldt.Google Scholar

Schmitt, C. 2015 (1942). Land and Sea. A World Historical Meditation. Translated S.G. Zeitlin. Candor, NY: Telos Press.Google Scholar

Schmitt, C. 2015 (1954). ‘Dialogue on new space’. In Dialogues on Power and Space. Cambridge: Polity, pp. 51–82.Google Scholar

Schmitt, C. 2018 (1955). ‘The historical structure of the contemporary world – opposition between East and West’. In Schmitt, C., with Berman, R. A. and Zeitlin, S. G. (eds and trans.), The Tyranny of Values and Other Texts. Candor NY: Telos Press, p. 134.Google Scholar

Schmitt, C. 2018. The Tyranny of Values and Other Texts. Translated R. A. Berman and S. G. Zeitlin. Candor, NY: Telos Press.Google Scholar

Schmitt, C. 2018 (1962). ‘To the true Johann Jakob Rousseau, on the 28th of June 1962’. In Schmitt, C., with Berman, R. A. and Zeitlin, S. G. (eds and trans.), The Tyranny of Values and Other Texts. Candor NY: Telos Press, pp. 167–74.Google Scholar

Schupmann, B. A. 2017. Carl Schmitt’s Constitutional and State Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Scurr, R. 2007. Fatal Purity. London: Vintage.Google Scholar

Selinger, W. 2016. ‘The politics of Arendtian historiography: European federation and the Origins of Totalitarianism’. Modern Intellectual History 13(2): 417–46.Google Scholar

Selinger, W. 2019. Parliamentarism: from Burke to Weber. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sieyès, E. 1789. ‘Préliminaire de la constitution Françoise – Reconnaissance et exposition raisonnée des droits de l’homme et du citoyen’. In Dorigny, M. (ed.), Œuvres de Sieyès. Vol. 2. Paris: EDHIS, pp. 34–5.Google Scholar

Sieyès, E. ‘What is the Third Estate?’ In Political Writings, pp. 138–9.Google Scholar

Sieyès, E. 1989. ‘Déclaration volontaire proposée aux Patriotes des 89 Départements, ce 17 juin 1791’. In Dorigny, M. (ed.), Œuvres de Sieyès. Paris: EDHIS.Google Scholar

Sieyès, E. 1989. ‘Des intérêts de la Liberté dans l’état social et dans le système représentatif. Par Em. Sieyès. Extrait du Journal d’instruction sociale par les citoyens Condorcet, Sieyès et Duhamel, 8 juin 1793’. In Dorigny, M. (ed.), Œuvres de Sieyès. Vol. 3. Paris: EDHIS, p. 35.Google Scholar

Sieyès, E. 1989. ‘Dire de l’abbè Sieyès sur la question du Veto royal, à la séance du 7 septembre 1789’. In Dorigny, M. (ed.), Œuvres de Sieyès. Paris: EDHIS.Google Scholar

Sieyès, E. 1989. ‘Instructions données par S. A. S. Monseigneur le Duc d’Orléans à ses représentants aux baillages’. In Dorigny, M. (ed.), Œuvres de Sieyès. Paris: EDHIS.Google Scholar

Sieyès, E. 1989. ‘Journal d’instruction sociale par les citoyens Condorcet, Sieyès et Duhamel, 8 Juin 1793’. In Dorigny, M. (ed.), Œuvres de Sieyès. Paris: EDHIS.Google Scholar

Sieyès, E. 1989. ‘Notice sur la vie’. In Dorigny, M. (ed.), Œuvres de Sieyès. Paris: EDHIS.Google Scholar

Sieyès, E. 1989. ‘Observations sur le rapport du comité de constitution, concernant la nouvelle organisation de la France’. In Dorigny, M. (ed.), Œuvres de Sieyès. Paris: EDHIS.Google Scholar

Sieyès, E. 1989. Œuvres de Sieyès. Edited by Dorigny, M.. Paris: EDHIS.Google Scholar

Sieyès, E. 1989. ‘Opinion de Sieyès sur les attributions et l’organisation du jury constitutionnaire proposé le 2 Thermidor, prononcée à la Convention nationale, le 18 du même mois, l’an III de la République’. In Dorigny, M. (ed.), Œuvres de Sieyès. Paris: EDHIS.Google Scholar

Sieyès, E. 1989. ‘Opinion de Sieyès sur plusieurs articles des titres IV et V du projet de constitution, prononcé à la Convention le 9 thermidor de l’an troisième de la République’. In Dorigny, M. (ed.), Œuvres de Sieyès. Paris: EDHIS.Google Scholar

Sieyès, E. 1989. ‘Préliminaire de la constitution Françoise – Reconnaissance et exposition raisonnée des droits de l’homme et du citoyen’. In Dorigny, M. (ed.), Œuvres de Sieyès. Paris: EDHIS.Google Scholar

Sieyès, E. 1989. ‘Projet de loi contre les Délits qui peuvent se commettre par la voie de l’impression et par la publication des Écrits et des Gravures, etc.’. In Dorigny, M. (ed.), Œuvres de Sieyès. Paris: EDHIS.Google Scholar

Sieyès, E. 1989. ‘Quelques idées de constitution applicables à la Ville de Paris. En juillet 1789’. In Dorigny, M. (ed.), Œuvres de Sieyès. Paris: EDHIS.Google Scholar

Sieyès, E. 1989. ‘Qu’est-ce que le Tiers État?’. In Dorigny, M. (ed.), Œuvres de Sieyès. Paris: EDHIS.Google Scholar

Sieyès, E. 1989. ‘Vues sur les moyens d’exécution dont les représentants de la France pourront disposer en 1789’. In Dorigny, M. (ed.), Œuvres de Sieyès. Paris: EDHIS.Google Scholar

Sieyès, E. 1998. ‘Bases de l’ordre social’. In Pasquino, P. (ed.), Sieyès et l’invention de la constitution en France. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar

Sieyès, E. 1999. Des Manuscrits de Sieyès. Edited by Fauré, C.. Vol. 1. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar

Sieyès, E. 1999. ‘Grand Cahier Métaphysique’. In Fauré, C. (ed.), Des Manuscrits de Sieyès. Vol. 1. Paris: Honoré Champion, p. 81.Google Scholar

Sieyès, E. 2007. Des Manuscrits de Sieyès. Edited by Fauré, C.. Vol. 2. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar

Sieyès, E. 2011. ‘Volonté-Liberté’. Edited by Guilhaumou, J. and Heurtin, J. P.. Revue Française d’Histoire des idées politiques 33.Google Scholar

Sluga, H. 2008. ‘The pluralism of the political: From Carl Schmitt to Hannah Arendt’. Telos 142(Spring): 91–109.Google Scholar

Soboul, A. 2005. Dictionnaire historique de la Révolution française. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Sommerer, E. 2011. ‘Le contractualisme révolutionnaire de Sieyès: Formation de la nation et prédétermination du pouvoir constituant’. Revue Française d’histoire des idées politiques 3: 5–25.Google Scholar

Sommerer, E. 2011. Sieyès: Le révolutionnaire et le conservateur. Paris: Michalon.Google Scholar

Sonenscher, M. 2003. Sieyès: Political Writings: Including the Debate between Sieyès and Tom Paine. London: Hackett.Google Scholar

Sonenscher, E. 2008. Sans-culottes: An Eighteenth-century Emblem in the French Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Sonenscher, E. 2009. Before the Deluge: Public Debt, Inequality, and the Intellectual Origins of the French Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Staff, I. 1991. Staatsdenken Im Italien des 20. Jahrhunderts Ein Beitrag Zur Carl Schmitt-Rezeption. Baden Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

Staff, I. 1994. ‘Costantino Mortati: Verfassung im materiellen Sinn. Ein Beitrag zur Rechtsentwicklung im faschistischen Italien und im Deutschland der Weimarer Zeit und im Nationalsozialismus’. Quaderni fiorentini per la storia del pensiero giuridico moderno xxiii: 265–364.Google Scholar

Straumann, B. 2016. Crisis and Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Thornill, C. 2012. ‘Contemporary constitutionalism and the dialectic of constituent power’. Global Constitutionalism 1(3): 369–404.Google Scholar

Thornill, C. 2013. ‘A sociology of constituent power: the political code of transnational societal constitutionalism’. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20(1): 551–603.Google Scholar

Tombs, R. 1996. France 1814–1914. New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Troper, M. 2008. ‘Sieyès et la hiérarchie des normes’. In Quiviger, Y., Denis, V. and Salem, J. (eds), Figures de Sièyer. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne, pp. 25–42.Google Scholar

Troper, M., and Jaume, L.. 1994. 1789 et l’invention de la constitution. Paris: Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence.Google Scholar

Tuck, R. 2016. The Sleeping Sovereign. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tully, J. 2008. ‘The imperialism of modern constitutional democracy’. In Loughlin, M. and Walker, N. (eds), The Paradox of Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 315–38.Google Scholar

Tuori, K. 2016. ‘Schmitt and the sovereignty of Roman dictators: from the actualisation of the past to the recycling of symbols’. History of European Ideas 42(1): 95–106.Google Scholar

Urbinati, N. 2006. Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Urbinati, N., and Lukes, S.. 2012. ‘Introduction’. In Urbinati, N. and Lukes, S. (eds), Condorcet: Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Vatter, M. 2015. ‘Political ontology, constituent power and representation’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 18(6): 679–86.Google Scholar

Vatter, M. 2002. ‘Legality and resistance: Arendt and Negri on constituent power’. Kairos 20: 191–230.Google Scholar

Vedel, G. 1958. ‘La notion de dialogue dans les démocraties modernes’. In Vedel, G. (ed.), Grands problèmes de la sciences politiques contemporaine. Brussels: Les éditions de la librairie encyclopédique.Google Scholar

Vedel, G. 1984 (1949). Manuel élémentaire de Droit Constitutionnel. Paris: Sirey.Google Scholar

Vedel, G. 1993. ‘Souveraineté et supraconstitutionnalité’. Pouvoirs (67): 76–96.Google Scholar

Vedel, G. 2002. ‘La pensée politique et le fédéralisme I’. Commentaire 98: 153–68.Google Scholar

Vergnaud, A. D. 1830. De la charte d’un peuple libre. Strasbourg.Google Scholar

Vinx, L. 2015. ‘Carl Schmitt’s defence of sovereignty’. In Dyzenhaus, D. (ed.), Law, Liberty and Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Vinx, L. 2015. ‘Carl Schmitt and the problem of constitutional guardianship’. In Arvidsson, M., Brännström, L. and Minkkinen, P. (eds), The Contemporary Relevance of Carl Schmitt: Law, Politics, Theology. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 34–49.Google Scholar

Vinx, L. (ed.). 2015. The Guardian of the Constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Vinx, L. 2019. ‘Ernst-Wolfgang Böckenförde and the politics of constituent power’, Jurisprudence 10(1): pp. 15–38.Google Scholar

Vinx, L., and Zeitlin, S. G. (eds and trans.). Forthcoming. Carl Schmitt’s Early Legal Theoretical Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Waldron, J. 2000. ‘Arendt’s constitutional politics’. In Villa, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Arendt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 201–19.Google Scholar

Waresquiel, E. 2002. Histoire de la Restauration, 1814–1830. Naissance de la France moderne. Paris: Perrin.Google Scholar

Wellmer, A. 2000. ‘Arendt on revolution’. In Villa, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hannah Arendt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 220–42.Google Scholar

Wenman, M. 2013. Agonistic Democracy: Constituent Power in the Era of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Williams, M. S. Forthcoming. ‘Deterritorializing Democratic Legitimacy’. In Fung, A., Gray, S. W. D. and Perry, T. (eds.), Democratic Inclusion in a Globalized World: The Principle of Affected Interests. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Yaqoob, W. 2014. ‘Reconciliation and violence: Hannah Arendt on historical understanding’, Modern Intellectual History 11(2): 385–416.Google Scholar

Young-Bruehl, E. 2004. Hannah Arendt: for Love of the World. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Zagrebelski, G. 1998. ‘Premessa’. In Mortati, C. (ed.), La costituzione in senso materiale. Milan: Giuffrè, pp. vii–xxxvii.Google Scholar

Zapperi, R. 1970. Qu’est-ce que le tiers état ? Paris: Droz.Google Scholar

Zeitlin, S. G. 2015. ‘Propaganda and critique: an introduction to land and Sea’. In Schmitt, C., with Berman, R. A. and Zeitlin, S. G. (eds), Land and Sea: A World Historical Meditation. Candor, NY: Telos Press, pp. xlvi–lii.Google Scholar

Zeitlin, S. G. 2017. ‘Interpretation and Critique: Jacob Taubes, Julien Fruend, and the Interpretation of Hobbes’. Telos 181 (Winter): 9–39.Google Scholar

Zeitlin, S. G. forthcoming. ‘Indirection and the Rhetoric of Tyranny: Carl Schmitt’s The Tyranny of Values 1960–1967’, Modern Intellectual History.Google Scholar

Zeldin, T. 1958. The Political System of Napoleon III. London: Macmillan & Co.Google Scholar

Zweig, E. 1909. Die Lehre vom Pouvoir Constituant: ein Beitrag zum Staatsrecht der französischen Revolution. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive