Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:35:32.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Sustainable inland fisheries – perspectives from the recreational, commercial and subsistence sectors from around the globe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2015

Steven J. Cooke
Affiliation:
Carleton University
Vivian M. Nguyen
Affiliation:
Carleton University
John M. Dettmers
Affiliation:
Great Lakes Fishery Commission
Robert Arlinghaus
Affiliation:
Humboldt University
Michael C. Quist
Affiliation:
University of Idaho
Denis Tweddle
Affiliation:
South African Institute of Aquatic Biodiversity
Olaf L. F. Weyl
Affiliation:
South African Institute of Aquatic Biodiversity
Rajeev Raghavan
Affiliation:
St. Albert's College
Marcela Portocarrero-Aya
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Naturales Alexander von Humboldt
Edwin Agudelo Cordoba
Affiliation:
Instituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científi cas SINCHI
Ian G. Cowx
Affiliation:
University of Hull
Gerard P. Closs
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Martin Krkosek
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Julian D. Olden
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Globally, freshwater ecosystems provide varied fishing opportunities (herein termed inland fisheries) represented by three sectors: recreational, commercial and subsistence fisheries. From the depths of the Laurentian Great Lakes to the shallow floodplains of the Ganges River, and from under-ice fisheries in Scandinavia to the rice fields of Southeast Asia, fish and other aquatic life are omnipresent components of fluvial and lacustrine systems. Freshwater fishes generate many ecosystem services that extend beyond their use in fisheries (Holmlund & Hammer, 1999; Cowx & Portocarrereo, 2011). Given the diversity of freshwater fish assemblages, levels of fisheries productivity, cultural norms, density of human population and socioeconomic conditions, it is not surprising that there is immense variation in how, why and the extent to which freshwater fishes and other aquatic animals are exploited. Whether it be sustaining livelihoods through the provision of essential nutrients, generating income, or enabling leisure time with family, inland fisheries are important. Although there are accepted definitions for the three fishing sectors (i.e. UN FAO – see below), ambiguities and exceptions remain that complicate appraisal and management.

Compared with marine waters where industrial-scale commercial fisheries predominate, inland fisheries tend to be smaller in scale and catches generally do not enter the global marketplace. Moreover, whereas exploitation pressures are the primary threat facing marine fish populations and marine ecosystems, in inland systems there are multiple threats including many unrelated to fishing (Arlinghaus et al., 2002). Indeed, declines in freshwater fish fauna are implicated with broad-scale economic activities such as flow regulation, hydropower, agriculture, urbanisation and pollution (Limburg et al., 2011; Chapters 4 and 9). Reflecting the multiple threats, freshwater fishes are among the most imperilled taxa on the globe (Strayer & Dudgeon, 2010; Chapter 2), freshwater biodiversity is in crisis (Dudgeon et al., 2006) and freshwater ecosystems are among the most altered (Kennish, 2002; Malmqvist & Rundle, 2002). Despite the many threats to inland fishes and fisheries, they receive disproportionally less interest and attention from the global conservation community and international political spheres. Indeed, global capture statistics underrepresented inland fisheries and their contribution to global production (Welcomme et al., 2010; Welcomme, 2011a,b), partly because of the diffuse nature of inland fisheries (Beard et al., 2011). By contrast, it is comparatively easy to generate data for commercial fisheries where products sold on established domestic and export markets can be readily monitored.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agreda-Rudenko, A. (2008). Sinopsis de la Pesca deportiva en Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia: Proexport Columbia.Google Scholar
Agudelo, C. E. (2007). La actividad pesquera en la zona suroriental de la amazonia colombiana: una descripción de la captura y comercialización de los bagres transfronterizos. Instituto de Ciencias y Tecnologías Ambientales. Barcelona, España: Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Agudelo, E., Sanchez Paez, C. L., Rodriguez Fernandez, C. A., Bonilla-Castillo, C. A. & Gómez Hurtado, G. A. (2011). Diagnóstico de la pesquería en la Cuenca del Amazonas. In II Pesquerías Continentales de Colombia: cuencas del Magdalena-Cauca, Sinú, Canalete, Atrato, Orinoco, Amazonas y vertiente del Pacífico. Serie Editorial Recursos Hidrobiológicos y Pesqueros Continentales de Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt.Google Scholar
Ajiaco-Martínez, R. E., Ramirez-Gil, H., Sánchez-Duarte, P., Lasso, C. A. & Trujillo, F. (2012). IV Diagnóstico de la pesca ornamental en Colombia. Serie Editorial Recursos Hidrobiológicos y pesqueros Continentales de Colombia. Bogotá, Colombia: Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt.Google Scholar
Allan, J. D., Abell, R., Hogan, Z., et al. (2005). Overfishing of inland waters. BioScience, 55, 1041–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Sportfishing Association. (2008). Today's Angler: A Statistical Profile of Anglers, their Targeted Species and Expenditures. Alexandria, VA: American Sportfishing Association.
Anon. (2012a). www.cauveryfishingcamp.com/about_bheemeshwari.html
Anon. (2012b). www.anglingdirectholidays.com/protect-the-mahseer/fishing-holidays-blog.html
Arlinghaus, R. (2005). A conceptual framework to identify and understand conflicts in recreational fisheries systems, with implications for sustainable management. Aquatic Resources, Culture and Development, 1, 145–174.Google Scholar
Arlinghaus, R. & Cooke, S. J. (2009). Recreational fisheries: socioeconomic importance, conservation issues and management challenges. In Recreational Hunting, Conservation and Rural Livelihoods: Science and Practice. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 39–58.Google Scholar
Arlinghaus, R., Mehner, T. & Cowx, I. G. (2002). Reconciling traditional inland fisheries management and sustainability in industrialized countries, with emphasis on Europe. Fish and Fisheries, 3, 261–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arlinghaus, R., Cooke, S. J., Lyman, J., et al. (2007). Understanding the complexity of catch-and-release in recreational fishing: an integrative synthesis of global knowledge from historical, ethical, social, and biological perspectives. Reviews in Fisheries Science, 15, 75–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M. R. & Schindler, D. E. (2009). Unaccounted mortality in salmon fisheries: non-retention in gillnets and effects on estimates of spawners. Journal of Applied Ecology, 46, 752–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, T. D. Jr, Rasmussen, P. W., Cox, S. & Carpenter, S. R. (2003). Evaluation of a management system for a mixed walleye spearing and angling fishery in northern Wisconsin. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 23, 481–491.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, T. D., Arlinghaus, R., Cooke, S. J., et al. (2011). Ecosystem approach to inland fisheries: research needs and implementation strategies. Biology Letters, 7, 481–483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beardmore, M., Dorow, M., Haider, W. & Arlinghaus, R. (2011). The elasticity of fishing effort response and harvest outcomes to altered regulatory policies in eel (Anguilla anguilla) recreational angling. Fisheries Research, 110, 136–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. V., Brown, K. B., Jackson, D. C. & Pierson, W. K. (2005). Lower Mississippi River and its tributaries. In Rivers of North America. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 231–281.Google Scholar
Brummett, R. E., Youaleu, J. L. N., Tiani, A-M. & Kenmegne, M. M. (2010). Women's traditional fishery and alternative aquatic resource livelihood strategies in the southern Cameroonian rainforest. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 17, 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlander, H. B. (1954). A History of Fish and Fishing in the Upper Mississippi River. Rock Island, IL: Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee.Google Scholar
Coates, D. (2002). Inland Capture Fishery Statistic of Southeast Asia: Current Status and Information Needs. Bangkok, Thailand: Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Cohen, B. I. (2012). The Uncertain Future of Fraser River Sockeye: Volume 1. Commission of Inquiry into the Decline of Sockeye Salmon in the Fraser River, Canada. Public Works and Government Services Canada.Google Scholar
Collares-Pereira, M. J. & Cowx, I. G. (2004). The role of catchment scale environmental management in freshwater fish conservation. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 11, 303–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colombo, R. E., Garvey, J. E., Jackson, N. D., et al. (2007). Harvest of Mississippi River sturgeon drives abundance and reproductive success: a harbinger of collapse?Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 23, 444–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, S. J. & Cowx, I. G. (2006). Contrasting recreational and commercial fishing: searching for common issues to promote unified conservation of fisheries resources and aquatic environments. Biological Conservation, 128, 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, S. J., Murchie, K. J. & Danylchuk, A. J. (2011). Sustainable ‘seafood’ ecolabelling and initiatives in the context of inland fisheries: needs and opportunities to increase food security and protect freshwater ecosystems. BioScience, 61, 911–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, S. J., Lapointe, N. W. R., Martins, E. G., et al. (2013). Failure to engage the public in issues related to inland fishes and fisheries: strategies for building public and political will to promote meaningful conservation. Journal of Fish Biology, 83, 997–1018.Google Scholar
Cowx, I. G. (1994). Stocking strategies. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 1, 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowx, I. G. (2002). Recreational fishing. In Handbook of Fish Biology and Fisheries, vol. 2. Oxford: Blackwell Science, pp. 367–390.Google Scholar
Cowx, I. G. & Portocarrero, A. M. (2011). Paradigm shifts in fish conservation: moving to the ecosystem services concept. Journal of Fish Biology, 79, 1663–1680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowx, I. G., Almeida, O., Bene, C., et al. (2004). Value of river fisheries. In Sustaining Livelihoods and Biodiversity in the New Millennium. Proceedings of the 2nd Large Rivers Symposium, vol. 1. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Mekong River Commission, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Cowx, I. G., Arlinghaus, R. & Cooke, S. J. (2010). Harmonizing recreational fisheries and conservation objectives for aquatic biodiversity in inland waters. Journal of Fish Biology, 76, 2194–2215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dannewitz, J., Maes, G. E., Johansson, L., et al. (2005). Panmixia in the European eel: a matter of time. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272, 1129–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jesus, M. J. & Kohler, C. C. (2004). The commercial fishery of the Peruvian Amazon. Fisheries, 29, 10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deap, L., Degen, P. & van Zalinge, N. (2003). Fishing Gears of the Cambodian Mekong. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Inland Fisheries Research and Development Institute of Cambodia. Fisheries Technical Paper.Google Scholar
Dekker, W. (2008). Coming to grips with the eel stock slip-sliding away. In International Governance of Fisheries Ecosystems: Learning from the Past, Finding Solutions for the Future. Bethesda, MD: American Fishery Society, pp. 335–355.Google Scholar
Dekker, W. (2009). A conceptual management framework for the restoration of the declining European eel stock. In Eels at the Edge: Science, Status and Conservation Concern American Fisheries Society, Symposium 58. Bethesda, MD: American Fishery Society.Google Scholar
Dettmers, J. M., Goddard, C. I. & Smith, K. D. (2012). Management of alewife using Pacific Salmon in the Great Lakes: whether to manage for economics or the ecosystem?Fisheries, 37, 495–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorow, M. & Arlinghaus, R. (2012). The relationship between personal commitment to angling and the opinions and attitudes of German anglers towards the conservation and management of the European eel Anguilla anguilla. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 32, 466–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorow, M., Beardmore, B., Haider, W. & Arlinghaus, R. (2010). Winners and losers of conservation policies for European eel, Anguilla anguilla: an economic welfare analysis for differently specialised anglers. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 17, 106–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudgeon, D., Arthington, A. H., Gessner, M. O., et al. (2006). Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews, 81, 163–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dugan, P. J., Barlow, C., Agostinho, A. A., et al. (2010). Fish migration, dams, and loss of ecosystem services in the Mekong basin. Ambio, 39, 344–348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
English, K. K., Edgell, T. C., Bocking, R. C., Link, M., & Raborn, S. (2011). Fraser River sockeye fisheries and fisheries management and comparison with Bristol Bay sockeye fisheries. LGL Ltd. Cohen Commission Technical Report 7.
European Commission. (2007). Council regulation (EC) No. 1100/2007 of 18 September 819 2007 establishing measures for the recovery of the stock of European eel. Official Journal of the Europian Union, 248, 17–23.
Fabre, N. N. & Alonso, J. C. (1998). Recursos icticos no Alto Amazonas: sua importancia nas populações ribeirinhas. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi Serie Botanica, 1, 19–55.Google Scholar
Food & Agriculture Organization [FAO]. (2011). Guidelines for the Ecolabelling of Fish and Fishery Products from Inland Capture Fisheries. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Food & Agriculture Organization [FAO]. (2012). The state of the world fisheries and aquaculture 2012. Rome: Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Feunteun, E. (2002). Management and restoration of European eel population (Anguilla anguilla): an impossible bargain. Ecological Engineering, 18, 575–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freyhof, J. & Kottelat, M. (2008). Anguilla anguilla. In 2008 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, ed. IUCN. www.iucnredlist.org
Friedland, K. D., Miller, M. J. & Knights, B. (2007). Oceanic changes in the Sargasso Sea and declines in recruitment of the European eel. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64, 519–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaden, M. (2007). Bridging jurisdictional divides: collective action through A Joint Strategic Plan for Management of Great Lakes Fisheries. PhD dissertation. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Gaden, M., Krueger, C. & Goddard, C. (2009). Managing across jurisdictional boundaries: fishery governance in the Great Lakes and Arctic-Yukon-Kuskokwim regions. In Pacific Salmon: Ecology and Management of Western Alaska's Populations. American Fisheries Society Symposium 70. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society, pp. 941–962.Google Scholar
Gale, M. K., Hinch, S. G., Eliason, E. J., Cooke, S. J. & Patterson, D. A. (2011). Physiological impairment of adult sockeye salmon in fresh water after simulated capture-and-release across a range of temperatures. Fisheries Research, 112, 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, S. M. (2003). The Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries: Issues, Terminology, Principles, Institutional Foundations, Implementation and Outlook, Volume 443. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, F., Acosta, L. E. & Salazar, C. A. (2004). Perfiles urbanos en la Amazonia colombiana: un enfoque para el desarrollo sostenible. Bogotá, Columbia: Editora Guadalupe.Google Scholar
Heathcote, I. W., Edwards, J. R., Greener, H. & Coombs, H. M. (1998). Integrated Watershed Management: Principles and Practice. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Holmlund, C. M. & Hammer, M. (1999). Ecosystem services generated by fish populations. Ecological Economics, 29, 253–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IGFA. (2012). IGFA Online World Record Search. http://wrec.igfa.org/WRecordsList.aspx?lc=AllTackleandcn=Tigerfish
International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. (2010). Report of the joint EIFAC/ICES Working Group on eels (WGEEL), 9–14 September 2010, Hamburg Germany. Rep. No. ICES CM 2010/ACOM: 18.
Junk, W. J. (1997). The Central Amazon Floodplain. Ecology of a Pulsing System. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennish, M. J. (2002). Environmental threats and environmental future of estuaries. Environmental Conservation, 29, 78–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knights, B. (2003). A review of the possible impacts of long-term oceanic and climate changes and fishing mortality on recruitment of anguillid eels of the northern hemisphere. Science of the Total Environment, 310, 237–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koch, J. D., Quist, M. C., Pierce, C. L., Hansen, K. A. & Steuck, M. J. (2009). Effects of commercial harvest on shovelnose sturgeon populations in the upper Mississippi River. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 29, 84–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krogman, R. M., Fischer, J. R., Quist, M. C., Steuck, M. J. & Marron, M. M. (2011). Historical trends in ictalurid catfish commercial harvest in the upper Mississippi River. American Fisheries Society Symposium, 77, 127–140.Google Scholar
Krueger, C. C. & Decker, D. J. (1999). The process of fisheries management. In Inland Fisheries Management in North America, second edition. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society, pp. 31–59.Google Scholar
Lake Erie Committee. (2012). www.glfc.org/pressrel/LEC_news_release_2012_3-29-12.pdf
Lester, N. P., Marshall, T. R., Armstrong, K., Dunlop, W. I. & Ritchie, B. (2003). A broad-scale approach to management of Ontario's recreational fisheries. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 23, 1312–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limburg, K. E., Hughes, R. M., Jackson, D. C. & Czech, B. (2011). Human population increase, economic growth, and fish conservation: collision course or savvy stewardship?Fisheries, 36, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lymer, D. & Funge-Smith, S. (2009). An Analysis of Historical National Reports of Inland Capture Fisheries Statistics in the Asia–Pacific Region (1950–2007). Bangkok: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, p. 18.Google Scholar
Malmqvist, B. R. & Rundle, S. (2002). Threats to the running water ecosystems of the world. Environmental Conservation, 29, 134–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martins, E. G., Hinch, S. G., Patterson, D. A., et al. (2011). Effects of river temperature and climate warming on stock-specific survival of adult migrating Fraser River sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Global Change Biology, 17, 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniels, T., Wilmot, S., Healey, M. & Hinch, S. (2010). Vulnerability of Fraser River sockeye salmon to climate change: a life cycle perspective using expert judgments. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 2771–2780.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKenney, B. & Tola, P. (2002). Natural Resources and Rural Livelihoods in Cambodia: A Baseline Assessment. Working Paper no. 23. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Cambodia Development Resource Institute.Google Scholar
Molur, S., Smith, K. G., Daniel, B. A. & Darwall, W. R. T. (2011). The Status of Freshwater Biodiversity in the Western Ghats. Coimbatore, India. Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK: International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and Natural Resources, p. 116.Google Scholar
Mosepele, K. & Ngwenya, B. N. (2010). Socio-economic survey of commercial fishing in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Okavango Report Series No. 7, pp. 1–75.
NACSO. (2010). Namibia's Communal Conservancies: A Review of Progress and Challenges in 2009. Windhoek, Namibia: NACSO, pp. 1–152.
NACSO. (2011). Living with Wildlife – The Story of Namibia's Communal Conservancies. Windhoek, Namibia: NACSO, pp. 1–28.
Nengu, S. M. (1995). Status of fisheries in wetlands. In Wetlands Management in Botswana: Proceedings of a Conference held in Kasane, Botswana, 14–16 November 1994. Botswana: Wetlands Coordinating Committee.Google Scholar
Ochoa, G. I., Wood, A. & Zarate, C. G. (2006). Puerto Nariño: El pueblo que se mira en el rio. Retos al desarrollo sustentable en los municipios amazónicos. Bogotá, Colombia: Instituto Latinoamericano de Servicios Legales Alternativos (ILSA).Google Scholar
Parkkila, K., Arlinghaus, R., Artell, J., et al. (2010). European inland fisheries advisory commission methodologies for assessing socio-economic benefits of European Inland Recreational Fisheries. European Inland Fisheries Advisory Commission Occasional Paper 46, 112 pp.
Pitlo, J. Jr. (1997). Response of upper Mississippi River channel catfish populations to changes in commercial harvest regulations. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 17, 848–859.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portocarrero-Aya, M. (2012). Conservation of the freshwater biodiversity in key areas of the Colombian Amazon. PhD Dissertation, The University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Poulsen, A. F., Poeu, O., Viravong, S., Suntornratana, U. & Thanh Tung, N. (2002). Fish migrations in the Lower Mekong River Basin: implications for development, planning and environmental management. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Mekong River Commission Technical Paper No. 8.
Prince, J. (2010). Rescaling fisheries assessment and management: a generic approach, access rights, change agents, and toolboxes. Bulletin of Marine Science, 86, 197–219.Google Scholar
Raby, G. D., Colotelo, A. H., Blouin-Demers, G. & Cooke, S. J. (2011). Freshwater commercial bycatch: an understated conservation problem. BioScience, 61, 271–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raghavan, R. (2011). Tor khudree. In IUCN 2012. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2012.2. www.iucnredlist.org
Raghavan, R. & Ali, A. (2011). Tor malabaricus. In IUCN 2012. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2012.2. www.iucnredlist.org
Raghavan, R., Ali, A., Dahanukar, N. & Rosser, A. (2011). Is the fishery for the Deccan Mahseer, Tor khudree (Sykes, 1839) in the Western Ghats Hotspot sustainable? A participatory approach to stock assessment. Fisheries Research, 110, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riaño Umbarila, E. (2003). Organizando se espacio, construyendo su territorio: transformaciones de los asentamientos Ticuna en la ribera del Amazonas colombiano. Leticia, Colombia: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Google Scholar
Risotto, S. P. & Turner, R. E. (1985). Annual fluctuation in abundance of the commercial fisheries of the Mississippi River and tributaries. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 5, 557–574.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roscoe, D. W. & Pollen, C. (2010). Report cards for three BC Recreational fisheries. Watershed Watch Salmon Society.
Salinas, Y. (1994). Aspectos de la Biología Pesquera de los Grandes Bagres (Ostariophysi: Siluriformes, Pimelodiade) en el Sector Colombiano del Río Amazonas. Bogotá, Colombia: Tesis (Lic. Biología) Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
Sampson, S. J., Chick, J. H. & Pegg, M. A. (2009). Diet overlap among two Asian carp and three native fishes in backwater lakes on the Illinois and Mississippi rivers. Biological Invasions 11, 483–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sledge, T. (1998). Mississippi River creel survey from St. Cloud to Dayton, May 10 to September 30, 1997. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Completion report.
Starkie, A. (2003). Management issues relating to the European eel, Anguilla anguilla. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 10, 361–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strayer, D. L. & Dudgeon, D. (2010). Freshwater biodiversity conservation: recent progress and future challenges. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 29, 344–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sverdrup-Jensen, S. (2002). Fisheries in the Lower Mekong Basin: Status and Perspectives. Mekong River Commission Technical Paper No. 6.
Sweeney, L., Baker, A., Thaniseb, A., et al. (2010). A preliminary economic assessment of the contribution of fishing lodges in the Caprivi Region to the local economy. Windhoek, Namibia: Namibia Nature Foundation.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. E. (1981). Oceanography of the British Columbia coast. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries Aquatic Science, 56, 291.Google Scholar
Tweddle, D. & Hay, C. J. (2011a). Data collection and analysis: Report on workshop conducted from 26–27 October 2011, Katima Mulilo, Namibia. Integrated Co-Management of Zambezi/Chobe River Fisheries Resource Project, Field Document no. MFMR/NNF/WWF/Phase II/5: 1–15.
Tweddle, D. & Hay, C. J. (2011b). Fish Protection Areas: documentation for their establishment in Sikunga and Impalila Conservancies. Integrated Co-Management of Zambezi/Chobe River Fisheries Resource Project, Field Document no. MFMR/NNF/WWF/Phase II/6: 1–28.
Tweddle, D., Bills, R., Waal, B. van de, et al. (2003). Fish diversity and fisheries in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. In A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Aquatic Ecosystems of the Okavango Delta, Botswana: High Water Survey: RAP 27. Washington, DC: Conservation International, pp. 97–110 and 210–245.Google Scholar
UNEP & ACTO. (2009). Environmental outlook in Amazonia – GEO Amazonia. United Nations Environmental Program, Amazon Cooperation Treaty Organization (ACTO) and Research Center of Universidad del Pacífico (CIUP).
Welcomme, R. L. (2001). Inland Fisheries: Ecology and Management. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welcomme, R. L. (2011a). An overview of global catch statistics for inland fish. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 68, 1751–1756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welcomme, R. (2011b). Review of the State of the World Fishery Resources: Inland Fisheries. Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 942, Rev. 2. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation.Google Scholar
Welcomme, R. L., Cowx, I. G., Coates, D., et al. (2010). Inland capture fisheries. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365, 2881–2896.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, A. (2007). The Pacific Salmon Treaty: a historical analysis and prescription for the future. Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation, 22, 153–195.Google Scholar
World Bank. (2012). Hidden Harvest: The Global Contribution of Capture Fisheries. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/11873.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×