Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 April 2017
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Conflict and Consensus in Early Greek Hexameter Poetry , pp. 208 - 222Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Abusch, T. et al. (eds) 1990. Lingering over Words: Studies in Ancient Near Eastern Literature in Honour of William Moran. Atlanta, GA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adkins, A. W. H. 1969. ‘Threatening, abusing and feeling angry in the Homeric poems’, JHS 89: 7–21.Google Scholar
Alden, M. J. 1997. ‘The resonances of the song of Ares and Aphrodite’, Mnemosyne 50: 513–29.Google Scholar
Allan, W. and Cairns, D. 2011. ‘Conflict and community in the Iliad’, in Fisher, and van Wees, (eds), pp. 113–46.Google Scholar
Allen, T. W. (ed.) 1912. Homeri Opera V: Hymnos Cyclum Fragmenta Margiten Batrachomyomachian Vitas Continens. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ando, C. and Rüpke, J. (eds) 2015. Public and Private in Ancient Mediterranean Law and Religion. Berlin.Google Scholar
Arthur, M. 1982. ‘Cultural strategies in Hesiod’s Theogony: law, family, society’, Arethusa 15: 63–82.Google Scholar
Bachvarova, M. R. 2013. Translation of the Song of Birth, in López-Ruiz, (ed.), pp. 140–4.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J. 1990. ‘Homeric discourse and enjambment: a cognitive approach’, TAPhA 120: 1–21.Google Scholar
Bannert, H. 1988. Formen des Wiederholens bei Homer: Beispiele für eine Poetik des Epos. Vienna.Google Scholar
Barker, E. T. E. 2004. ‘Achilles’ last stand: institutionalizing dissent in Homer’s Iliad’, PCPhS 50: 92–120.Google Scholar
Barker, E. T. E. 2008. ‘Momos advises Zeus: changing representations of Cypria fragment 1’, in Cingano, and Milano, (eds), pp. 33–74.Google Scholar
Barker, E. T. E. 2009. Entering the Agōn: Dissent and Authority in Homer, Historiography and Tragedy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bassino, P. 2012. ‘Certamen Homeri et Hesiodi: nuovi spunti per una riconsiderazione delle testimonianze papiracee’, ZPE 180: 38–42.Google Scholar
Bassino, P. 2013. ‘Homer: A Guide to Selected Sources’, Living Poets (Durham), http://livingpoets.dur.ac.uk/w/Homer:_A_Guide_to_Selected_Sources.Google Scholar
Beall, E. F. 2004. ‘The plow that broke the plain epic tradition: Hesiod Works and Days vv. 414–503’, ClAnt 23(1): 1–31.Google Scholar
Beecroft, A. J. 2010. Authorship and Cultural Identity in Early Greece and China: Patterns of Literary Circulation. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beissinger, M., Tylus, J. and Wofford, S. (eds) 1999. Epic Traditions in the Contemporary World. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Betts, J., Hooker, J. and Green, T. (eds) 1986. Studies in Honour of T. B. L. Webster, vol. I. Bristol.Google Scholar
Bottéro, J. and Kramer, S. N. 1993. Lorsque les dieux faisaient l’homme: mythologie mésopotamienne, 2nd edn. Paris.Google Scholar
Brady, M. and Leal, J. 2011. Wim Wenders and Peter Handke: Collaboration, Adaptation, Recomposition. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Braswell, B. K. 1982. ‘The song of Ares and Aphrodite: theme and relevance to Odyssey 8’, Hermes 110(2): 129–37.Google Scholar
Breitenberger, B. 2007. Aphrodite and Eros: The Development of Erotic Mythology in Early Greek Poetry and Cult. London and New York.Google Scholar
Brown, B. 2003. ‘Homer, funeral contests and the origins of the Greek city’, in Phillips, and Pritchard, (eds), pp. 123–62.Google Scholar
Brown, C. 2006. ‘Pindar on Archilochus and the gluttony of blame (Pyth. 2.52–6)’, JHS 126: 36–46.Google Scholar
Buchan, M. 2004. The Limits of Heroism: Homer and the Ethics of Reading. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Budelmann, F. and Michelakis, P. (eds) 2001. Homer, Tragedy and Beyond: Essays in Honour of P. E. Easterling. London.Google Scholar
Budelmann, F. and Phillips, T. R. (eds) in press. Textual Events: Performance and the Lyric in Early Greece. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, J. 2001. The Tradition of the Trojan War in Homer and the Epic Cycle. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1984. ‘Sacrificio-sacrilegio: il “trickster” fondatore’, StudStor 25(4): 835–45.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. L. 2001. ‘Affronts and quarrels in the Iliad’, in Cairns, (ed.), pp. 203–19.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. 1983. ‘Alcaeus’ Hymn to Hermes, P.Oxy 2734 Fr. 1 and Horace, Odes 1,10’, QUCC 42: 29–35.Google Scholar
Cancik-Kirschbaum, E., Van Ess, M. and Marzahn, J. (eds) 2011. Babylon: Wissenskultur in Orient und Okzident. Berlin and Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Canevaro, L. G. 2014. ‘Genre and authority in Hesiod’s Works and Days’, in Werner, , Sebastiani, and Dourado-Lopes, (eds), pp. 23–48.Google Scholar
Cavalli, M. 1999. ‘Le Rane di Aristofane: modelli tradizionali dell’agone fra Eschilo ed Euripide’, in Conca, (ed.), pp. 83–105.Google Scholar
Christopoulos, M. 2010. ‘Casus belli: causes of the Trojan War in the Epic Cycle’, Classics@ Volume 6: Karakantza, Efimia D., ed. The Center for Hellenic Studies of Harvard University, edition of 4 February 2011.Google Scholar
Cingano, E. and Milano, L. (eds) 2008. Papers on Ancient Literatures: Greece Rome and the Near East. Proceedings of the Advanced Seminar in the Humanities, Venice International University 2004–2005. Padua.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. 2001. ‘Heart-cutting talk: Homeric κερτομέω and related words’, CQ 51(2): 329–38.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. 1989. The Politics of Olympus: Form and Meaning in the Major Homeric Hymns. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. 1993. ‘The education of Perses: from “Mega Nepios” to “Dion Genos” and back’, MD 31: 23–33.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. 2007. ‘Art, nature and the gods in the chariot race of Iliad Ψ’, in Paizi-Apostolopoulou, , Rengakos, and Tsagalis, (eds), pp. 69–75.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. 2011. Homer’s Trojan Theater: Space, Vision, and Memory in the Iliad. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Collins, D. 2004. Master of the Game: Competition and Performance in Greek Poetry. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Crowther, N. B. 1992. ‘Second-place finishes and lower in Greek athletics (including the Pentathlon)’, ZPE 90: 97–102.Google Scholar
Cyrino, M. S. 2010. Aphrodite. Gods and Heroes of the Ancient World. London and New York.Google Scholar
Debiasi, A. 2012. ‘Homer ἀγωνιστής in Chalcis’, in Montanari, , Rengakos, and Tsagalis, (eds), pp. 471–500.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. 1997. ‘This is where I intend to build a glorious temple’ (transl. J. Lloyd), Arion 4: 1–27.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. and Vernant, J.-P. 1978. Cunning Intelligence in Greek Culture and Society (transl. J. Lloyd). Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Dickie, M. W. 1984a. ‘Fair and foul play in the Funeral Games of the Iliad’, Journal of Sport History 11: 8–17.Google Scholar
Dickie, M. W. 1984b. ‘Phaeacian athletes’, Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar, vol. IV: 237–76.Google Scholar
Domínguez, C., Saussy, H. and Villanueva, D. 2015. Introducing Comparative Literature: New Trends and Applications. London.Google Scholar
Donlan, W. 1993. ‘Duelling with gifts in the Iliad: as the audience saw it’, ColbyQ 29: 155–72.Google Scholar
Dunkle, J. R. 1987. ‘Nestor, Odysseus and the μῆτις-βίη antithesis: the Funeral Games, Iliad 23’, CW 81: 1–17.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. W. 1986. ‘The conventions of a Homeric funeral’, in Betts, , Hooker, and Green, (eds), pp. 84–92.Google Scholar
Eidinow, E. 2015. ‘Φανερὰν ποιήσει τὴν αὑτοῦ διάνοιαν τοῖς θεοῖς: some ancient Greek theories of (divine and mortal) mind’, in Ando, and Rüpke, (eds), pp. 53–72.Google Scholar
Eidinow, E., Kindt, J. and Osborne, R. (eds) 2016. Theologies of Ancient Greek Religion. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Elmer, D. F. 2013. The Poetics of Consent: Collective Decision Making and the Iliad. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Faulkner, A. 2008. The Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite: Introduction, Text, and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Felson, N. 2007. ‘Epinician ideology at the Phaeacian Games: θ 97–265’, in Paizi-Apostopoulou, , Rengakos, and Tsgalis, (eds), pp. 129–43.Google Scholar
Foley, J. M. (ed.) 1981. Oral Traditional Literature: A Festschrift for Albert Bates Lord. Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Fowler, A. 2003. ‘The formation of genres in the Renaissance and after’, New Literary History 34: 185–200.Google Scholar
Fryde, E. B. 1996. Greek Manuscripts in the Private Library of the Medici, 1469–1510, vol. II. Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
Gerrig, R. J. 1989. ‘Suspense in the absence of uncertainty’, Journal of Memory and Language 28(6): 633–48.Google Scholar
Goedicke, H. and Roberts, J. J. M. (eds) 1975. Unity and Diversity: Essays in the History, Literature, and Religion of the Ancient Near East. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 1991. The Poet’s Voice: Essays on Poetics and Greek Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 2010. ‘Idealism in the Odyssey and the meaning of mounos in Odyssey 16’, in Mitsis, and Tsagalis, (eds), pp. 115–28.Google Scholar
González, J. M. 2013. The Epic Rhapsode and His Craft: Homeric Performance in a Diachronic Perspective. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Görgemanns, H. 1976. ‘Rhetorik und Poetik im homerischen Hermeshymnus’, in Görgemanns, and Schmidt, (eds), pp. 113–28.Google Scholar
Görgemanns, H. and Schmidt, E. A. (eds) 1976. Studien zum antiken Epos, Franz Dirlmeier und Viktor Poeschel gewidmet. Meisenheim.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. 2001. ‘Competition in wisdom’, in Budelmann, and Michelakis, (eds), pp. 57–74.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. 2016b. ‘Theologies of the family in Homer and Hesiod’, in Eidinow, , Kindt, and Osborne, (eds), pp. 35–61.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. and Greenwood, E. (eds) 2007. Homer in the Twentieth Century: Between World Literature and the Western Canon. Oxford.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. and Haubold, J. 2003. ‘Masculinity: ΗΝΟΡΕΗ and ΑΓΗΝΟΡΙΗ’, JHS 123: 60–76.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2006. Das Geschichtsbild der Ilias: Eine Untersuchung aus phänomenologischer und narratologischer Perspektive. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2010a. ‘Experientiality and “narrative reference”, with thanks to Thucydides’, H&T 49: 315–35.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. 2010b. ‘The narrative reconfiguration of time beyond Ricoeur’, Poetics Today 31(2): 313–29.Google Scholar
Hägg, R. (ed.) 1983. The Greek Renaissance of the Eighth Century B.C.: Tradition and Innovation. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Hägg, T. and Utas, B. 2003. The Virgin and Her Lover: Fragments of an Ancient Greek Novel and a Persian Epic Poem. Leiden.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. 2008. Greek Laughter: A Study of Cultural Psychology from Homer to Early Christianity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hammer, D. C. 1997. ‘“Who shall readily obey?”: authority and politics in the Iliad’, Phoenix 51(1): 1–24.Google Scholar
Hammer, D. C. 2002. The Iliad as Politics: The Performance of Political Thought. Norman, OK.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. H. 1976. Apagoge, Endeixis and Ephegesis against Kakourgoi, Atimoi and Pheugontes. Odense.Google Scholar
Haubold, J. 2005. ‘Heracles in the Hesiodic Catalogue of Women’, in Hunter, (ed.), pp. 85–98.Google Scholar
Haubold, J. 2010. ‘Shepherd, farmer, poet, sophist: Hesiod on his own reception’, in Boys-Stones, and Haubold, (eds), pp. 11–30.Google Scholar
Hawkins, T. 2008. ‘Out-foxing the wolf-walker: Lycambes as performative rival to Archilochus’, ClAnt 27(1): 93–114.Google Scholar
Hesk, J. P. 2006. ‘Homeric flyting and how to read it: performance and intratext in Iliad 20.83–109 and 20.178–258’, Ramus 35(1): 4–28.Google Scholar
Heubeck, A., West, S. and Hainsworth, J. B. 1988. A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey, vol. I: Introduction and Books I–VIII. Oxford.Google Scholar
Higbie, C. 1990. Measure and Music: Enjambement and Sentence Structure in the Iliad. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hilgert, M. 2009. ‘Von “Listenwissenschaft” und “epistemischen Dingen”: Konzeptuelle Annäherungen an altorientalische Wissenspraktiken’, Journal for General Philosophy of Science 40: 277–309.Google Scholar
Hill, J. and Marmodoro, A. (eds) 2013. The Author’s Voice in Classical and Late Antiquity. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hinckley, L. V. 1986. ‘Patroclus’ Funeral Games and Homer’s character portrayal’, CJ 81(3): 209–21.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. 1998. Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hirschberger, M. 2004. Gynaikon Katalogos und Megalai Ehoiai: Ein Kommentar zu den Fragmenten zweier hesiodeischer Epen. Munich and Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hitch, S. S. and Rutherford, I. C. (eds) in press. Animal Sacrifice in the Ancient Greek World. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hoffner, H. A. Jr. 1975. ‘Hittite mythological texts: a survey’, in Goedicke, and Roberts, (eds), pp. 136–45.Google Scholar
Holoka, J. P. 1983. ‘“Looking Darkly” (ΥΠΟΔΡΑ ΙΔΩΝ): reflections on status and decorum in Homer’, TAPhA 113: 1–16.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (ed.) 2005. The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: Constructions and Reconstructions. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2009. ‘Hesiod’s style: towards an ancient analysis’, in Montanari, , Rengakos, and Tsagalis, (eds), pp. 253–69.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 2014. Hesiodic Voices: Studies in the Ancient Reception of Hesiod’s Works and Days. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R., Rengakos, A. and Sistakou, E. (eds) 2014. Hellenistic Studies at a Crossroads: Exploring Texts, Contexts and Metatexts. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Jones, P. V. and Wright, G. M. (eds) 1997. Homer: German Scholarship in Translation. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kahane, A. 2005. Diachronic Dialogues: Authority and Continuity in Homer and the Homeric Tradition. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Kämmerer, T. R. and Metzler, K. A. 2012. Das babylonische Weltschöpfungsepos Enūma elîš. Münster.Google Scholar
Karakantza, E. 2010. ‘Eating from the tables of others: Sophocles’ Ajax and the Greek Epic Cycle’, Classics@ Volume 6: Karakantza, Efimia, ed. The Center for Hellenic Studies of Harvard University, edition of 21 December 2010.Google Scholar
Katsonopoulou, D., Petropoulos, I. and Katsarou, S. (eds) 2008. The Proceedings of ‘Archilochus and his Age,’ Paroikia, Paros, October 2005. Athens.Google Scholar
Katz, D. 2011. ‘Reconstructing Babylon: recycling mythological traditions toward a new theology’, in Cancik-Kirschbaum, , Van Ess, and Marzahn, (eds), pp. 123–34.Google Scholar
Kelly, A. 2008a. ‘The Babylonian captivity of Homer: the case of the Dios Apate’, RhM 151: 259–304.Google Scholar
Kelly, A. 2008b. ‘Performance and rivalry: Homer, Odysseus, and Hesiod’, in Revermann, and Wilson, (eds), pp. 177–203.Google Scholar
Kelly, S. 1974. Homeric Correption and the Metrical Distinctions between Speeches and Narrative, PhD diss. Harvard.Google Scholar
Kilb, H. 1973. Strukturen epischen Gestaltens: im 7. u. 23. Gesang der Odyssee. Munich.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S. 1966. ‘Studies in some technical aspects of Homeric style’, YClS 20: 73–152.Google Scholar
Kitchell, K. F. 1998. ‘“But the mare I will not give up”: the Games in Iliad 23’, CB 74(2): 159–71.Google Scholar
König, J. 2011. ‘Competitiveness and anti-competitiveness in Philostratus’ Lives of the Sophists’, in Fisher, and van Wees, (eds), pp. 279–300.Google Scholar
Koning, H. H. 2010. Hesiod: The Other Poet. Ancient Reception of a Cultural Icon. Leiden.Google Scholar
Kopff, E. C. 1983. ‘The structure of the Amazonia (Aethiopis)’, in Hägg, (ed.), pp. 57–62.Google Scholar
Lambert, S. D. (ed.) 2011. Sociable Man: Essays on Ancient Greek Social Behaviour in Honour of Nick Fisher. Swansea.Google Scholar
Larson, J. 1995. ‘The Corycian nymphs and the bee maidens of the Homeric Hymn to Hermes’, GRBS 36: 341–57.Google Scholar
Latacz, J. 2014. ‘On Nietzsche’s philological beginnings’, in Jensen, and Heit, (eds), pp. 3–26.Google Scholar
Lateiner, D. 1995. Sardonic Smile: Nonverbal Behaviour in Homeric Epic. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Lavigne, D. E. 2008a. ‘Bad “Kharma”: a “fragment” of the Iliad and iambic laughter’, Aevum(ant) N.S. 8: 115–38.Google Scholar
Lavigne, D. E. 2008b. ‘The persona of Archilochos and iambic performance’, in Katsonopoulou, , Petropoulos, and Katsarou, (eds), pp. 91–113.Google Scholar
Lavigne, D. E. 2016. ‘Archilochus and Homer in the rhapsodic context’, in Carey, and Swift, (eds), pp. 74–98.Google Scholar
Lentini, G. 2013. ‘The pragmatics of verbal abuse in Homer’, Classics@ Volume 11: Tell, Håkan, ed. The Center for Hellenic Studies of Harvard University.Google Scholar
Lloyd, M. 2004. ‘The politeness of Achilles: off-record conversation strategies in Homer and the meaning of κερτομία’, JHS 124: 75–89.Google Scholar
Lohmann, D. 1992. ‘Homer als Erzähler: die Athla im 23. Buch der Ilias’, Gymnasium 99: 289–319.Google Scholar
López-Ruiz, C. 2010. When the Gods Were Born: Greek Cosmogonies and the Near East. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
López-Ruiz, C. (ed.) 2013. Gods, Heroes, and Monsters: A Sourcebook of Greek, Roman, and Near Eastern Myths in Translation, ed. López-Ruiz, C.. New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. 2002. The Divided City: On Memory and Forgetting in Ancient Athens (transl. C. Pache and J. Fort). New York.Google Scholar
Lord, A. B. 1981. ‘Memory, fixity, and genre in oral traditional poetries’, in Foley, (ed.), pp. 451–61.Google Scholar
Lowe, N. J. 2000. The Classical Plot and the Invention of Western Narrative. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Machinist, P. 2005. ‘Order and disorder: some Mesopotamian reflections’, in Shaked, (ed.), pp. 31–61.Google Scholar
Macleod, C. 1983. ‘Homer on poetry and the poetry of Homer’, in Collins, (ed.), pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Mahaffy, J. P. 1891. The Flinders Petrie Papyri with Transcriptions, Commentaries and Index. Dublin.Google Scholar
Marks, J. 2005. ‘The ongoing νεῖκος: Thersites, Odysseus, and Achilleus’, AJPh 126(1): 1–31.Google Scholar
Marsilio, M. 1992. ‘Dependence and self-sufficiency in Hesiod’s Works and Days’, PhD diss. Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Martin, R. P. 1984. ‘Hesiod, Odysseus, and the instruction of princes’, TAPhA 114: 29–48.Google Scholar
Martin, R. P. 1989. The Language of Heroes: Speech and Performance in the Iliad. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Michalowski, P. 1990. ‘Presence at the creation’, in Abusch, et al. (eds), pp. 381–96.Google Scholar
Mitsis, P. and Tsagalis, C. (eds) 2010. Allusion, Authority and Truth: Critical Perspectives on Greek Poetic and Rhetorical Praxis. Berlin.Google Scholar
Montanari, F., Rengakos, A. and Tsagalis, C. (eds) 2009. Brill’s Companion to Hesiod. Leiden.Google Scholar
Montanari, F., Rengakos, A. and Tsagalis, C. (eds) 2012. Homeric Contexts: Neoanalysis and the Interpretation of Oral Poetry. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Morris, I. 2014. War! What is it Good For? Conflict and the Progress of Civilization from Primates to Robots. London.Google Scholar
Morrison, J. V. 1992a. ‘Alternatives to the epic tradition: Homer’s challenges in the Iliad’, TAPhA 122: 61–71.Google Scholar
Morrison, J. V. 1992b. Homeric Misdirection: False Predictions in the Iliad. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Morson, G. S. 1994. Narrative and Freedom: The Shadows of Time. New Haven, CN and London.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. 1989. ‘The structure and function of Odysseus’ Apologoi’, TAPhA 119: 15–30.Google Scholar
Murnaghan, S. 1997. ‘Equal honor and future glory: the plan of Zeus in the Iliad’, in Roberts, , Dunn, and Fowler, (eds), pp. 23–42.Google Scholar
Myerston, J. 2013. ‘Divine names in the Derveni papyrus and Mesopotamian hermeneutics’, Trends in Classics 5: 74–110.Google Scholar
Nagler, M. 1988. ‘Toward a semantics of ancient conflict: Eris in the Iliad’, CW 82: 81–90.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. 1979. The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. 1999a. The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry, revised edition. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. 1999b. ‘Epic as genre’, in Beissinger, , Tylus, and Wofford, (eds), pp. 21–32.Google Scholar
Nesselrath, H.-G. 1992. Ungeschehenes Geschehen: Beinahe-Episoden im griechischen und römischen Epos von Homer bis zur Spätantike. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. 1870. ‘Der Florentinische Tractat über Homer und Hesiod, ihr Geschlecht und ihren Wettkampf, 1–2’, RhM 25: 528–40.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. 1871. ‘Certamen quod dicitur Homeri et Hesiodi: e codice florentino post Henricum Stephanum denuo edidit Fridericus Nietzsche Numburgensis’, Acta societatis philologae Lipsiensis 1: 1–23.Google Scholar
Olson, S. D. 2012. The Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite and Related Texts: Text, Translation and Commentary. Berlin and Boston, MA.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, N. 1992. Alcidamas, Aristophanes and the Beginnings of Greek Stylistic Theory. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Paizi-Apostopoulou, M., Rengakos, A. and Tsagalis, C. (eds) 2007. Contests and Rewards in the Homeric Epics: Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on the Odyssey. Ithaca, Greece.Google Scholar
Parks, W. 1990. Verbal Dueling and Heroic Narrative: The Homeric and Old English Traditions. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Parry, M. 1971. The Making of Homeric Verse: The Collected Papers of Milman Parry, ed. A. Parry. Oxford.Google Scholar
Penglase, C. 1994. Greek Myths and Mesopotamia: Parallels and Influence in the Homeric Hymns and Hesiod. London and New York.Google Scholar
Peschel, I. 1987. Die Hetäre bei Symposium und Komos in der attisch rotfigurigen Malerei des 6.–4. Jhs. v. Chr. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Petrovic, A. and Petrovic, I. 2016. Inner Purity and Pollution in Greek Religion. Oxford.Google Scholar
Phillips, D. and Pritchard, D. J. (eds) 2003. Sport and Festival in the Ancient World. Swansea.Google Scholar
Pirenne-Delforge, V. 1994. L’Aphrodite grecque: contribution à l’étude de ses cultes et de sa personnalité dans le panthéon archaïque et classique. Liège.Google Scholar
Pritchard, J. B. (ed.) 2011. The Ancient Near East: An Anthology of Texts and Pictures. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Pucci, P. 1987. Odysseus Polytropos: Intertexual Readings in the Odyssey and the Illiad. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Redfield, J. M. 1975. Nature and Culture in the Iliad: The Tragedy of Hector. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Reece, S. 1993. The Stranger’s Welcome: Oral Theory and the Aesthetics of the Homeric Hospitality Scene. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Revermann, M. and Wilson, P. (eds) 2009. Performance, Reception, Iconography: Studies in Honour of Oliver Taplin. Oxford.Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. 2007. ‘The Games in Book θ of the Odyssey’, in Paizi-Apostopoulou, , Rengakos, and Tsagalis, (eds), pp. 121–7.Google Scholar
Richter, S. L. 2002. The Deuteronomistic History and the Name Theology: lešakkēn šemô šām in the Bible and the Ancient Near East. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Roberts, D., Dunn, F. and Fowler, D. (eds) 1997. Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Rollinger, R. and Ulf, C. (eds) 2004. Griechische Archaik: Interne Entwicklungen – Externe Impulse. Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. M. 1990. ‘Poetry and sailing in Hesiod’s Works and Days’, ClAnt 9(1): 99–113.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. M. 2004. ‘Aristophanes’ Frogs and the Contest of Homer and Hesiod’, TAPhA 134(2): 295–322.Google Scholar
Roth, P. 2014. ‘Old Books, New Thoughts’, New York Times Style Magazine, 9 June, www.nytimes.com/2014/11/06/t-magazine/pen-auction-philip-roth.html?_r=0 (accessed on 24 February 2016).Google Scholar
Rüter, K. 1969. Odysseeinterpretationen: Untersuchungen zum ersten Buch und zur Phaiakis. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Russo, J. 1992. ‘Books XVII–XX’, in Russo, , Fernandez-Galiano, and Heubeck, (eds), pp. 3–127.Google Scholar
Russo, J., Fernandez-Galiano, M. and Heubeck, A. (eds). 1992. A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey, vol. III: Books XVII–XXIV. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. 2009. ‘Hesiod and the literary traditions of the Near East’, in Montanari, , Rengakos, and Tsagalis, (eds), pp. 9–35.Google Scholar
Rutherford, R. B. 1985. ‘At home and abroad: aspects of the structure of the Odyssey’, PCPhS 31: 133–50.Google Scholar
Schmitz, W. 2004. ‘Griechische und nahöstliche Spruchweisheit: Die “erga kai hemerai” Hesiods und nahöstliche Weisheitsliteratur’, in Rollinger, and Ulf, (eds), pp. 311–33.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. 1998. ‘Bardic performance and oral tradition in Homer’, AJPh 119(2): 171–94.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. 2008a. Epic Facework: Self-Presentation and Social Interaction in Homer. Swansea.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. 2009. Listening to Homer: Tradition, Narrative, and Audience, 2nd edn. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Seaford, R. 1994. Reciprocity and Ritual: Homer and Tragedy in the Developing City-State. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2010. ‘Hesiod’s Theogony and Plato’s Timaeus’, in Boys-Stones, and Haubold, (eds), pp. 246–58.Google Scholar
Segal, C. P. 1962. ‘The Phaeacians and the symbolism of Odysseus’ return’, Arion 1(4): 17–64.Google Scholar
Seri, A. 2012. ‘The role of creation in Enūma eliš’, Journal of Ancient Near Eastern Religions 12: 4–29.Google Scholar
Seri, A. 2014. ‘Borrowings to create anew: intertextuality in the Babylonian Poem of Creation (Enūma eliš)’, JAOS 134: 89–106.Google Scholar
Shaked, S. (ed.) 2005. Genesis and Regeneration: Essays on Conceptions of Origins. Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Sider, D. 2014. ‘Didactic poetry: the Hellenistic invention of a pre-existing genre’, in Hunter, , Rengakos, and Sistakou, (eds), pp. 13–29.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. 1968. ‘Zur Theologie im grossen Aphrodite-Hymnus’, in Kleine Schriften, vol. I, Hildesheim: 55–67.Google Scholar
Spariosu, M. 1991. The God of Many Names: Play, Poetry and Power in Hellenic Thought from Homer to Aristotle. Durham, NC and London.Google Scholar
Stamatopoulou, Z. 2016. ‘The quarrel with Perses and Hesiod’s biographical tradition’, GRBS 56: 1–17.Google Scholar
Stanley, K. 1993. The Shield of Homer: Narrative Structure in the Iliad. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Steiner, D. 2009. ‘Ritual, poetic mockery and the Odysseus–Iros encounter’, ClAnt 28(1): 71–100.Google Scholar
Steinrück, M. 2008. The Suitors in the Odyssey: The Clash Between Homer and Archilochus. Bern.Google Scholar
Sternberg, M. 1992. ‘Telling in time (II): chronology, teleology, narrativity’, Poetics Today 13(3): 463–541.Google Scholar
Thalmann, W. G. 1984. Conventions of Form and Thought in Early Greek Epic Poetry. Baltimore, MD and London.Google Scholar
Thalmann, W. G. 1988. ‘Comedy, scapegoats, and heroic ideology in the Iliad’, TAPhA 118: 1–28.Google Scholar
Thalmann, W. G. 1998. The Swineherd and the Bow: Representations of Class in the Odyssey. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Thomas, O. R. H. 2010. ‘Ancient Greek awareness of child language acquisition’, Glotta 86: 185–223.Google Scholar
Thomas, O. R. H. in press a. ‘Hermetically unsealed: lyric genres in the Homeric Hymn to Hermes’, in Budelmann and Phillips (eds), in press. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, O. R. H. in press b. ‘Sacrifice and the Homeric Hymn to Hermes 112–41’, in Hitch and Rutherford (eds), in press. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tötösy de Zepetnek, S. 1998. Comparative Literature: Theory, Method, Application. Amsterdam and Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
van der Valk, M. (ed.) 1971. Eustathii Archiepiscopi Thessalonicensis Commentarii ad Homeri Iliadem Pertinentes, vol. I. Leiden.Google Scholar
van Dongen, E. 2011. ‘The “kingship in heaven”-theme of the Hesiodic Theogony: origin, function, composition’, GRBS 51: 180–201.Google Scholar
van Wees, H. 1992. Status Warriors: War, Violence and Society in Homer and History. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Vergados, A. 2013. The Homeric Hymn to Hermes: Introduction, Text and Commentary. Berlin and Boston, MA.Google Scholar
von Soden, W. 1936. ‘Leistung und Grenze sumerischer und babylonischer Wissenschaft’, Die Welt als Geschichte: Zeitschrift für universalgeschichtliche Forschung 2: 411–64 and 509–57.Google Scholar
von Wolzogen, C. 1885. Schillers Leben: Verfasst aus Erinnerungen der Familie, seinen eigenen Briefen und den Nachrichten seines Freundes Körner. Stuttgart and Tübingen.Google Scholar
Wehr, O. 2006. ‘The judgement of Paris in Homer: re-examining Iliad 8,548–552 and 24,27–30’, JAC 21: 41–60.Google Scholar
Weil, S. 2003. The Iliad or the Poem of Force (ed. and transl. J P. Holoka). New York.Google Scholar
Weiler, I. 1975. ‘ΑΙΕΝ ΑΡΙΣΤΕΥΕΙΝ: Ideologiekritische Bemerkungen zu einem vielzitierten Homerwort’, Stadion 1: 199–227.Google Scholar
Wenders, W. and Handke, P. 1998. Der Himmel über Berlin: Ein Filmbuch von Wim Wenders und Peter Handke. Berlin.Google Scholar
Werner, C., Sebastiani, B. B. and Dourado-Lopes, A. (eds) 2014. Gêneros poéticos na Grécia antiga: confluências e fronteiras. São Paulo.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (ed.) 1966. Hesiod: Theogony. Edited with Prolegomena and Commentary by M. L. West. Oxford.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (ed.) 1978. Hesiod: Works and Days. Edited with Prolegomena and Commentary by M. L. West. Oxford.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1985. The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women: Its Nature, Structure and Origins. Oxford.Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1997. The East Face of Helicon: West Asiatic Elements in Greek Poetry and Myth. Oxford.Google Scholar
Winnifrith, T. 1992. ‘Funeral games in Homer and Virgil’, in Winnifrith, and Barrett, (eds), pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Wisnom, L. S. 2014. Intertextuality in Babylonian Narrative Poetry: Anzû, Enūma Elish, and Erra and Ishum. PhD diss. University of Oxford.Google Scholar