Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-27gpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T12:33:15.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2017

Laurie Bauer
Affiliation:
Victoria University of Wellington
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Valerie. 1973. An introduction to modern English word formation. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Adams, Valerie. 2001. Complex words in English. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003. A grammar of Tariana. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allan, Robin, Holmes, Philip & Lundskær-Nielsen, Tom. 1995. Danish: a comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Allen, Margaret Rees. 1978. Morphological investigations. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Allen, W. Sidney. 1974. Vox graeca: the pronunciation of Classical Greek. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Amaya, Maria Trillos. 1999. Damana. Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Arnaud, Pierre J. L. & Renner, Vincent. 2014. English and French [NN]N units: a categorical, morphological and semantic comparison. Word Structure 7: 128.Google Scholar
Arndt-Lappe, Sabine. 2011. Towards an exemplar-based model of stress in English noun-noun compounds. Journal of Linguistics 47: 549585.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ayto, John. 1990. The Longman register of new words, volume 2. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C. & Fasola, Carlos A.. 2009. Arucanian: Mapudungun. In Lieber, Rochelle & Štekauer, Pavol (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 594608. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ballier, Nicolas. 2015. “Phrasal compounds” and the discourse/lexicology interface: “conglomeration” within the French tradition of English lexicology. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 12/3 (A Festschrift for Pavol Štekauer): 115141.Google Scholar
Bally, Charles. 1950 [1932]. Linguistique générale et linguistique française. 3rd edition. Berne: Franke.Google Scholar
Barcelona, Antonio. 2008. The interaction of metonymy and metaphor in the meaning and form of ‘bahuvrihi’ compounds. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 6: 208281.Google Scholar
Bat-El, Outi. 2000. The grammaticality of “extragrammatical” morphology. In Doleschal, Ursula & Thornton, Anna M. (eds.), Extragrammatical and marginal morphology, 6181. Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1978. The grammar of nominal compounding. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1980. Deux problèmes au sujet des noms composés comprenant un premier élément verbal en français moderne. Le français moderne 48: 219224.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1983a. English word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1983b. Stress in compounds: a rejoinder. English Studies 64: 4753.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1990. Be-heading the word. Journal of Linguistics 26: 131.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1998a. Vocabulary. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1998b. Is there a class of neoclassical compounds, and if so is it productive? Linguistics 36: 403422.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 2000. Word. In Booij, Geert, Lehmann, Christian & Mugdan, Joachim (eds.), Morphology: an international handbook of inflection and word-formation, 247257. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 2001. Morphological productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 2003. Introducing linguistic morphology. 2nd edition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 2004a. A glossary of morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 2004b. Adjectives, compounds and words. Nordic Journal of English Studies 3/1 (= Worlds of Words: A tribute to Arne Zettersten): 722.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 2008a. Dvandva. Word Structure 1: 120.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 2008b. Exocentric compounds. Morphology 18: 5174.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 2009. IE, Germanic: Danish. In Lieber, Rochelle & Štekauer, Pavol (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 400416. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 2010a. Co-compounds in Germanic. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 22: 201219.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 2010b. The typology of exocentric compounding. In Scalise, Sergio & Vogel, Irene (eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding, 167175. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 2014. Grammaticality, acceptability, possible words and large corpora. Morphology 24: 83103.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 2015a. Expletive insertion. American Speech 90: 122127.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 2015b. Regularities in irregularities in English inflection. Te Reo 56–57: 312.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 2015c. Stressing about the news. Paper presented at the New Zealand Linguistic Society meeting, Dunedin, December 2015.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 2016. Re-evaluating exocentricity in word-formation. In Siddiqi, Daniel & Harley, Heidi (eds.), Morphological metatheory. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. In press. Compounds. In Aarts, Bas, Bowie, Jill & Popova, Gergana (eds.), The Oxford handbook of English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie & Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. Lexical word formation. In Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds.), The Cambridge grammar of the English language, 16211721. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. 2013. The Oxford reference guide to English morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie & Renouf, Antoinette. 2001. A corpus-based study of compounding in English. Journal of English Linguistics 29: 101123.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie & Tarasova, Elizaveta. 2013. The meaning link in nominal compounds. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 10: 118.Google Scholar
Bauer, Winifred. 1997. The Reed reference grammar of Māori. Auckland: Reed.Google Scholar
Beard, Robert. 1981. The Indo-European lexicon. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Beard, Robert. 1982. The plural as a lexical derivation. Glossa 16: 133148.Google Scholar
Beliaeva, Natalia. 2014. Unpacking contemporary English blends: morphological structure, meaning, processing. Unpublished PhD thesis, Victoria University of Wellington.Google Scholar
Bell, Melanie. 2011. At the boundary of morphology and syntax: Noun noun constructions in English. In Galani, Alexandra, Hicks, Glynn & Tsoulos, George (eds.), Morphology and its interfaces, 137168. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bell, Melanie J. 2014. The English noun-noun construct: a morphological and syntactic object. In Ralli, Angela, Booij, Geert, Scalise, Sergio and Karasimos, Athanasios (eds.), Morphology and the architecture of grammar, 59–91. https://geertbooij.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/mmm8_proceedings.pdf.Google Scholar
Bell, Melanie & Plag, Ingo. 2012. Informativeness is a determinant of compound stress in English. Journal of Linguistics 48: 485520.Google Scholar
Bell, Melanie & Schäfer, Martin. 2016. Modelling semantic transparency. Morphology 26: 157199.Google Scholar
Benczes, Réka. 2014. Repetitions which are not repetitions: the non-redundant nature of tautological compounds. English Language and Linguistics 18: 431447.Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth. 2009. Children’s acquisition of compound constructions. In Lieber, Rochelle & Štekauer, Pavol (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 298322. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bisetto, Antonietta. 2010. Recursiveness and Italian compounds. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 7: 1435.Google Scholar
Bisetto, Antonietta & Scalise, Sergio. 2005. The classification of compounds. Lingue e Linguaggio 4: 319332.Google Scholar
Bisetto, Antonietta & Scalise, Sergio. 2007. Selection is a head property. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 54: 361380.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1935. Language. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Bogoras, Waldemar. 1922. Chukchee. In Boas, Franz (ed.), Handbook of American Indian languages Part 2, 639903. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Böhmerová, Ada. 2010. Blending as lexical amalgamation and its onomasiological and lexicographical status in English and Slovak. Bratislava: ŠEVT.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2002. The morphology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2007. The Grammar of Words. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2009. Compounding and construction morphology. In Lieber, Rochelle & Štekauer, Pavol (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 201216. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 1988. On the morphological parallels between compounds and constructs. Yearbook of Morphology 1988: 4565.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2009. Afro-Asiatic, Semitic: Hebrew. In Lieber, Rochelle & Štekauer, Pavol (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 491511. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Breindl, Eva & Thurmair, Maria. 1992. Der Fürstbischof im Hosenrock. Eine Studie zu den nominalen Kopulativkomposita des Deutschen. Deutsche Sprache 20: 3261.Google Scholar
Brekle, Herbert E. 1970. Generative Satzsemantik und transformationelle Syntax im System der englischen Nominalkomposition. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Brekle, Herbert E. 1973. Zur Stellung der Wortbildung in der Grammatik. Trier: LAUT.Google Scholar
Brekle, Herbert E. 1978. Reflections on the conditions for the coining, use and understanding of nominal compounds. In Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Meid, Wolfgang (eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth International Congress of Linguists, Vienna, August 28–September 2, 1977, 6877. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Mchombo, Sam A.. 1995. The Lexical Integrity Principle: evidence from Bantu. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 13: 181254.Google Scholar
Bright, William. 2013. Native American placenames of the Southwest. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl. 1900. Das Wesen der sogenannten Wortzusammensetzung. Berichte über die Verhandlungen der Königl.-Sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig, Philologisch-Historische Klasse 52: 359401.Google Scholar
Buck, Carl Darling. 1933. Comparative grammar of Greek and Latin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Burrows, T. 1973. The Sanskrit language. 3rd edition. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Cannon, Garland. 1987. Historical change and English word-formation. New York: Lang.Google Scholar
Carr, Charles T. 1939. Nominal compounds in Germanic. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 2002. An introduction to English morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 2005. Phrases inside compounds: a puzzle for lexicon-free morphology. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 2/3: 3442.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Jacobs, Roderick A. and Rosenbaum, Peter S. (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar, 184221.Waltham, MA: Ginn.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 2007. Canonical typology, suppletion and possible words. Language 83: 842.Google Scholar
Corbin, Danielle. 1991. Introduction. La formation des mots: structures et interprétations. Lexique 10: 730.Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugene. 1977. Inhaltliche Wortbildungslehre (am Beispiel des Typs coupe-papier). In Brekle, Herbert E. & Kastovsky, Dieter (eds.), Perspektiven der Wortbildungsforschung, 4661. Bonn: Grundmann.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 2004. Bambara. In Arnaud, Pierre J. L. (ed.), Le nom composé: données sur seize langues, 2146. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.Google Scholar
Cruse, Alan. 1986. Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 2008. A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. 6th edition. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cubberley, Paul. 2002. Russian: a linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dansk, Sprognævn. 2015. Retskriviningsregler §19. www.dsn.dk/retskrivning/retskrivningsregler/ (accessed 17 June 2015)Google Scholar
Darmsteter, Arsène. 1875. Formation des mots composés en français. Paris.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2004. BYU-BNC. (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). Available online at http://corpus.byu.edu/bnc/.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2008. The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 450+ million words, 1990–present. www.americancorpus.org/.Google Scholar
Davies, William. 1986. Choctaw verb agreement and Universal Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, Desmond C. 1979. Hixkaryana. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Detmold, Gaye Çinkılıç & Weiß, Helmut. 2012. Kopulativkomposita. Linguistische Berichte 232: 417435.Google Scholar
Dierickx, Jean. 1970. Why are plural attributives becoming more frequent? In Dierickx, Jean & Lebrun, Yvan (eds.), Linguistique contemporaine: hommage à Eric Buyssens, 3946. Brussels: Editions de l’institut de sociologie de l’université libre.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna Maria & Williams, Edwin. 1987. On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1982. Where have all the adjectives gone? Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.. 2002. Word: a typological framework. In Dixon, R. M. W. & Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (eds.), Word: a cross-linguistic typology, 141. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Don, Jan. 2009. IE, Germanic: Dutch. In Lieber, Rochelle & Štekauer, Pavol (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 370385. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Douloureux, P. R. N. Tic. 1971. A note on one’s privates. In Zwicky, Arnold M., Salus, Peter H., Binnick, Robert I., Vanek, Anthony L. (eds.), Studies out in left field: defamatory essays presented to James D. McCawley on the occasion of his 33rd or 34th birthday, 4553. Reprinted in 1992. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Downing, Pamela. 1977. On the creation and use of English compound nouns. Language 77: 810–42.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. 2000. Extragrammatical vs. marginal morphology. In Doleschal, Ursula & Thornton, Anna M. (eds.), Extragrammatical and marginal morphology, 110. Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. 2006. Compound types. In Libben, Gary & Jarema, Gonia (eds.), The representation and processing of compound words, 2344. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Einarsson, Stefán. 1949. Icelandic. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Peter. 2006. Grundriß der deutschen Grammatik: Das Wort. Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
England, Nora C. 1983. A grammar of Mam, a Mayan language. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Erben, Johannes. 1975. Einführung in die deutsche Wortbildungslehre. Berlin: Schmidt.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 2002. Problems of polysynthesis. Berlin: Akademie.Google Scholar
Fabb, Nigel. 1998. Compounding. In Spencer, Andrew & Zwicky, Arnold M. (eds.), The handbook of morphology, 6683. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio & Scalise, Sergio. 2012. Morphology: from data to theories. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Fleischer, Wolfgang & Barz, Irmhild. 2007. Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Fortescue, M[ichael]. 1994. Morphology, polysynthetic. In Asher, R. E. (ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 26002602. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Fradin, Bernard. 2009. IE, Romance: French. In Lieber, Rochelle & Štekauer, Pavol (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 417435. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fudge, Erik. 1984. English word-stress. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Gagné, Christina L. 2009. Psycholinguistic perspectives. In Lieber, Rochelle & Štekauer, Pavol (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 255271. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gagné, Christina L. & Shoben, Edward J.. 1997. The influence of thematic relations on the comprehension of non-predicating conceptual combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23: 7187.Google Scholar
Geerdts, Donna B. 1998. Incorporation. In Spencer, Andrew & Zwicky, Arnold M. (eds.), The handbook of morphology, 84100. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Giegerich, Heinz J. 1999. Lexical strata in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giegerich, Heinz J. 2004. Compound or phrase? English noun-plus-noun constructions and the stress criterion. English Language and Linguistics 8: 124.Google Scholar
Giegerich, Heinz J. 2005. Associative adjectives in English and the lexicon–syntax interface. Journal of Linguistics 41: 571591.Google Scholar
Giegerich, Heinz J. 2009. The English compound stress myth. Word Structure 2: 117.Google Scholar
Giegerich, Heinz J. 2015. Lexical structures: compounding and the modules of grammar. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Gijn, Rik van & Zúñiga, Fernando. 2014. Word and the Americanist perspective. Morphology 24: 135160.Google Scholar
Gove, Philip B. (ed.) 1966. Webster’s third new international dictionary of the English language. Springfield, MA: Merriam.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2012. Quantitative corpus data of blend formation: psycho- and cognitive-linguistic perspectives. In Renner et al. (eds.), 145–167.Google Scholar
Grzega, Joachim. 2009. Compounding from an onomasiological perspective. In Lieber, Rochelle & Štekauer, Pavol (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 217232. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Wim de & Trommelen, Mieke. 1993. Morfologisch handboek van het Nederlands. ‘s-Gravenhage: SDU.Google Scholar
Hacken, Pius ten. 2013. Semiproductivity and the place of word formation in grammar. In ten Hacken, Pius & Thomas, Claire (eds.), The semantics of word formation and lexicalization, 2844. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Christopher. 1992. Modern German pronunciation. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. 2000. Where in the word is the Udi clitic? Language 76: 593616.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. 2006. Revisiting anaphoric islands. Language 82: 114130.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. A grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2002. Understanding morphology. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2016. The serial verb construction: comparative concept and cross-linguistic generalizations. Language and Linguistics 17: 291319.Google Scholar
Hatcher, Anna Granville. 1960. An introduction to the analysis of English noun compounds. Word 16: 356373.Google Scholar
Heusinger, Klaus von & Schwarze, Christoph. 2013. Italian V+N compounds, inflectional features and conceptual structure. Morphology 23: 325350.Google Scholar
Hippisley, Andrew. 2015. The word as a universal category. In Taylor, John R. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of the word, 246269. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack. n.d. Elative compounds in Dutch: properties and developments. www.let.rug.nl/~hoeksema/elative.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Carl. 1963. A grammar of the Margi language. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, Philip & Hinchliffe, Ian. 1994. Swedish: a comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio & de Urbina, Jon Ortiz. 2003. A grammar of Basque. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney. 2002a. The clause: complements. In Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds.), The Cambridge grammar of the English language, 213321. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney. 2002b. Non-finite and verbless clauses. In Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds.), The Cambridge grammar of the English language, 11711271. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard A. 1987. Zwicky on heads. Journal of Linguistics 23: 109132.Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard A. 1993. Do we have heads in our minds? In Corbett, Greville G., Fraser, Norman M. & McGlashan, Scott (eds.), Heads in grammatical theory, 266291. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko & Mester, Ralf Armin. 2005 [1986]. The phonology of voicing in Japanese. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 4973, reprinted in Tsujimura, Natsuko (ed.), Japanese linguistics, 38–64. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Soichi & Ingkaphirom, Preeya. 2005. A reference grammar of Thai. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1977. X-bar syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 2016. English noun-noun compounds in Conceptual Semantics. In ten Hacken, Pius (ed.), The semantics of compounding, 1537. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1927. A modern English grammar on historical principles. Part III: syntax, second volume. London: Allen and Unwin and Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1942. A modern English grammar on historical principles. Part VI: morphology. London: Allen and Unwin and Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Johnston, Michael & Busa, Frederica. 1999. Qualia structure and the compositional interpretation of compounds. In Viegas, E. (ed.), Breadth and depth of semantic lexicons, 167187. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Julien, M[arit]. 2006. Word. In Brown, Keith (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd edition, vol. 13, 617624. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Karlsson, Fred. 1983. Finnish grammar. Porvoo: Söderström.Google Scholar
Karlsson, Fred. 2006. Finnish as an agglutinating language. In Brown, Keith (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd edition, vol. 4, 476480. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Kageyama, Taro. 2009. Isolate: Japanese. In Lieber, Rochelle & Štekauer, Pavol (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 512526. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kasar, Sündüz Öztürk. 2004. Turc. In Arnaud, Pierre J. L. (ed.), Le nom composé: données sur seize langues, 269285. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.Google Scholar
Katamba, Francis & Stonham, John. 1986. Morphology. 2nd edition. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kenesei, István. 2014. On a multifunctional derivational affix. Word Structure 7: 214239.Google Scholar
Kiefer, Ferenc. 2009. Uralic, Finno-Ugric: Hungarian. In Lieber, Rochelle & Štekauer, Pavol (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 527541. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Killingley, Siew-Yue & Killingley, Dermot. 1995. Sanskrit. Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Kingdon, Roger. 1958. The groundwork of English stress. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Klinge, Alex. 2005. The structure of English nominals. Doctoral dissertation, Copenhagen Business School.Google Scholar
Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1997. Turkish. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
KorpusDK. 1990–2002. København: Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab. http://ordnet.dk/korpusdkGoogle Scholar
Körtvélyessy, Lívia, Štekauer, Pavol & Zimmermann, Július. 2015. Word-formation strategies: semantic transparency vs. formal economy. In Bauer, Laurie, Körtvélyessy, Lívia & Štekauer, Pavol (eds.), Semantics of complex words, 85113. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Koshiishi, Tetsuya. 2002. Collateral adjectives, Latinate vocabulary, and English morphology. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 37: 4988.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltan & Radden, Günter. 1998. Metonymy: developing a cognitive linguistic point of view. Cognitive Linguistics 9: 3777.Google Scholar
Kunter, Gero. 2011. Compound stress in English. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. 1966. English in advertising. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Lees, Robert B. 1960. The grammar of English nominalizations. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lees, Robert B. 1970. Problems in the grammatical analysis of English nominal compounds. In Bierwisch, Manfred & Heidolph, Karl Erich (eds.), Progress in linguistics, 174186. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Levi, Judith. 1978. The syntax and semantics of complex nominals. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Hovav, Malka Rappaport. 1995. Unaccusativity at the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles & Thompson, Sandra A.. 1981. Mandarin Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Libben, Gary. 2010. Semantic transparency in processing compounds. Consequences for representation, processing, and impairment. Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 17: 114.Google Scholar
Libben, Gary, Boniecki, Monika, Martha, Marlies, Mittermann, Karin, Korecky-Kröll, Katharina & Dressler, Wolfgang U.. 2009. Interfixation in German compounds: what factors govern acceptability judgements. Rivista di Linguistica 21: 149180.Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 2008. A grammar of Toqabaqita. Berlin: Mouton de Guyter.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. 1992. Deconstructing morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. 1994. Root compounds and synthetic compounds. In Asher, R. E. (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, vol. 7, 36073610. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. 2016. Compounding in the lexical semantic framework. In ten Hacken, Pius (ed.), The semantics of compounding, 3853. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lombard, Alf. 1930. Les constructions nominales dans le français modern. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksells.Google Scholar
López Rúa, Paula. 2004. The categorial continuum of English blends. English Studies 85: 6376.Google Scholar
Lowe, John J. 2015. The syntax of Sanskrit compounds. Language 91: e71e115.Google Scholar
Luo, Yongxian. 2008. Zhuang. In Diller, Anthony V. N., Edmundson, Jerold A. & Luo, Yongxian (eds.), The Tai-Kadai languages, 317377. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Luschützky, Hans Christian & Rainer, Franz. 2013. Instrument and place nouns: a typological and diachronic perspective. Linguistics 51: 13011359.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1968. Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Macdonell, A[rthur] A[nthony]. 1926. A Sanskrit grammar for students. 3rd edition. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. Reprinted in 1997, New Delhi: D. K. Printworld.Google Scholar
Marchand, Hans. 1969. The categories and types of present-day English word-formation. 2nd edition. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen & Yip, Virginia. 1994. Cantonese: a comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meibauer, Jörg. 2007. How marginal are phrasal compounds? Generalized insertion, expressivity, and I/Q-interaction. Morphology 17: 233259.Google Scholar
Ménová, Martina. 2012. Phrasal compounds in contemporary British newspapers. Unpublished thesis, Charles University of Prague.Google Scholar
Millroy, James. 1977. The language of Gerard Manley Hopkins. London: Deutsch.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2000. Incorporation. In Booij, Geert, Lehmann, Christian & Mugdan, Joachim (eds.), Morphology: an international handbook of inflection and word-formation, 916928. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mukai, Makiko. 2008. Recursive compounds. Word Structure 1: 178198.Google Scholar
Mutt, O. 1967. Some recent developments in the use of nouns as pre-modifiers in English. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 15: 401408.Google Scholar
Nagano, Akiko. 2011. The right-headedness of morphology and the status and development of category-determining prefixes in English. English Language and Linguistics 15: 6183.Google Scholar
Nagano, Akiko. 2016. Are relational adjectives possible cross-linguistically? The case of Japanese. Word Structure 9: 4271.Google Scholar
Neef, Martin. 2009. IE, Germanic: German. In Lieber, Rochelle & Štekauer, Pavol (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 386399. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Neef, Martin. 2015. The status of so-called linking elements in German: arguments in favour of a non-functional analysis. Word Structure 8: 2952.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1986. Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language 62: 56119.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Sten Hedegård. 1998. Adstantiver: en ny ordklasse i dansk? Mål og Mæle 21/1: 2325.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina & Spencer, Andrew. 2012. Possession and modification – a perspective from canonical typology. In Brown, Dunstan, Chumakina, Marina & Corbett, Greville G. (eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax, 207238. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina & Tolskaya, Maria. 2001. A grammar of Udihe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
OED. OED [The Oxford English Dictionary] Online. Oxford University Press. www.oed.com/. Consulted between June 2015 and November 2016.Google Scholar
Olsen, Susan. 2001. Copulative compounds: a closer look at the distinction between morphology and syntax. Yearbook of Morphology 2000, 279320.Google Scholar
Oniga, Renato. 2014. Trans. Schifano, Norma. Latin: a linguistic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Osborne, C. R. 1974. The Tiwi language. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Packard, Jerome L. 2000. The morphology of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank. 1987. The English verb. 2nd edition. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Palmer, Leonard R. 1980. The Greek language. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Panfilov, Valerij S. 2004. Vietnamesisch (Viet-Muong). In Booij, Geert, Lehmann, Christian, Mugdan, Joachim & Skopetas, Stavros (eds.), Morphologie 2. Halbband/Morphology volume 2, 15451554. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Payne, John. 1993. The headedness of noun phrases: slaying the nominal hydra. In Corbett, Greville G., Fraser, Norman M. & McGlashan, Scott (eds.), Heads in grammatical theory, 114139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Payne, John & Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. Nouns and noun phrases. In Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds.), The Cambridge grammar of the English language, 323524. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2001. Exemplar dynamics: word frequency, lenition and contrast. In Bybee, Joan & Hopper, Paul (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. 137157. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2003. Phonetic diversity, statistical learning, and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech 46: 115154.Google Scholar
Pinker, Steven. 1999. Words and rules. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo. 2003. Word-formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo. 2006. The variability of compound stress in English: structural, semantic and analogical factors. English Language and Linguistics 10: 143172.Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo, Kunter, Gero, Lappe, Sabine & Braun, Maria. 2008. The role of semantics, argument structure, and lexicalization in compound stress assignment in English. Language 84: 760794.Google Scholar
Pöll, Bernhard. 2015. Restricted recursion in N-N compounding: some thoughts on possible reasons. Linguistische Berichte 242: 141163.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K. & Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. Adjectives and adverbs. In Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds.), The Cambridge grammar of the English language, 525595. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Quintero, Carolyn. 2004. Osage grammar. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Radford, Andrew. 1993. Head-hunting: on the trail of the nominal Janus. In Corbett, Greville G., Fraser, Norman M. & McGlashan, Scott (eds.), Heads in grammatical theory, 73113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Radimský, Jan. 2015. Noun + noun compounds in Italian. Česke Budějovice: Jihočeska Univerzita.Google Scholar
Rae, Megan Elizabeth. 2010. Ordering restrictions of modifiers in complex nominals. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia.Google Scholar
Rainer, Franz. 2013. Can relational adjectives really express any relation? An onomasiological approach. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 10: 1240.Google Scholar
Ralli, Angela. 2009. IE, Hellenic: Modern Greek. In Lieber, Rochelle & Štekauer, Pavol (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 453463. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ralli, Angela & Xydpoulos, George J.. 2012. Blend formation in Modern Greek. In Renner et al. (eds.), 35–50.Google Scholar
Rau, Jeremy. 2010. Greek and Proto-Indo-European. In Bakker, Egbert J. (ed.), A companion to the ancient Greek language, 171188. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Renner, Vincent. 2008. On the semantics of English coordinate compounds. English Studies 899: 606613.Google Scholar
Renner, Vincent, Maniez, François & Arnaud, Pierre J. L.. (eds.) 2012. Cross-disciplinary perspectives on lexical blending. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Roeper, Thomas & Siegel, Muffy E. A.. 1978. A lexical transformation for verbal compounds. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 199260.Google Scholar
Rosenbach, Anette. 2006. Descriptive genitives in English: a case study on constructional gradience. English Language and Linguistics 10: 77118.Google Scholar
Ryder, Mary Ellen. 1994. Ordered chaos: the interpretation of English noun-noun compounds. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. 1986. Some notes on noun incorporation. Language 62: 1931.Google Scholar
Scalise, Sergio & Bisetto, Antonietta. 2009. The classification of compounds. In Lieber, Rochelle & Štekauer, Pavol (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 3453. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scalise, Sergio & Fábregas, Antonio. 2010. The head in compounding. In Scalise, Sergio & Vogel, Irene (eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding, 109125. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Scalise, Sergio & Vogel, Irene. 2010. Why compounding? In Scalise, Sergio & Vogel, Irene (eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding, 118. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Martin. 2015. Semantic transparency and anaphoric islands. In ten Hacken, Pius & Thomas, Claire (eds.), The semantics of word formation and lexicalization, 140160. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Seegmiller, Steve. 1996. Karachay. Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Simpson, Jane. 2009. Pama-Nyungan: Warlpiri. In Lieber, Rochelle & Štekauer, Pavol (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 609622. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John (ed.). 2005. The Collins COBUILD English grammar. 2nd edition. Glasgow: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-Min. 1999. The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 1991. Morphological theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 2011. What is a compound? Journal of Linguistics 47: 481507.Google Scholar
Sridhar, S. N. 1990. Kannada. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Štekauer, Pavol, Valera, Salvador & Körtvélyessy, Lívia. 2012. Word-formation in the world’s languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strang, Barbara M. H. 1968. Modern English structure. 2nd edition. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Sulkala, Helena & Karjalainen, Merja. 1992. Finnish. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Suomi, Kari. 1985. On detecting words and word boundaries in Finnish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 8: 211231.Google Scholar
Szubert, Andrej. 2012. Zur internen Semantik der substantivischen Komposita im Dänischen. Poznań: Wydanictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Szymanek, Bogdan. 2009. IE, Slavonic: Polish. In Lieber, Rochelle & Štekauer, Pavol (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 464477. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tarasova, Elizaveta. 2013. Some new insights into the semantics of English N+N compounds. Unpublished PhD thesis, Victoria University of Wellington.Google Scholar
Thompson, Laurence. 1965. A Vietnamese grammar. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur, Petersen, Hjalmar P., Jacobsen, Jógvan í Lon & Hansen, Zakaris Svabo. 2004. Faroese. Tórshavn: Føroya Frøđskarpafelag.Google Scholar
Tribulato, Olga. 2015. Ancient Greek verb-initial compounds. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, Ben. 2012. A computational semantic analysis of noun compounds in Dutch. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Antwerpen.Google Scholar
Vestergaard, Torben & Schrøder, Kim. 1985. The language of advertising. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Villoing, Florence. 2009. Les mot composés VN. In Fradin, Bernard, Kerleroux, Françoise & Plénat, Marc (eds.), Aperçus de morphologie du français, 175197. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Google Scholar
Wälchli, Bernard. 2005. Co-compounds and natural coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wandruszka, Ulrich. 1972. Französische Nominalsyntagmen. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Ward, Denis. 1965. The Russian language today. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Ward, Gregory, Sproat, Richard & McKoon, Gail. 1991. A pragmatic analysis of so-called anaphoric islands. Language 67: 439474.Google Scholar
Watters, David E. 2002. A grammar of Kham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wells, J[ohn] C. 2008. Longman pronunciation dictionary. 3rd edition. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Whitney, William Dwight. 1889. Sanskrit grammar. 2nd edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press and London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiese, Richard. 1996. The phonology of German. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1981. On the notions ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of a word’. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 245274.Google Scholar
Williams, Marianne Mithun. 1974. A grammar of Tuscarora. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
Wisniewski, Edward J. and Wu, Jing. 2012. Emergency!!!! Challenges to a compositional understanding of noun–noun combinations. In Hinzen, Wolfram, Machery, Edouard, & Werning, Markus (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compositionality, 403417. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wray, Alison. 2015. Why are we so sure we know what a word is? In Taylor, John R. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of the word, 725750. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1985. Heads. Journal of Linguistics 21: 129.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1993. Heads, bases and functors. In Corbett, Greville G., Fraser, Norman M. & McGlashan, Scott (eds.), Heads in grammatical theory, 292315. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Indriðason, Þorsteinn G.. 2000. Morfologi møter syntax: Om genitivsammensatte ord i islandsk. Nordica Bergensia 22: 174200.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Laurie Bauer, Victoria University of Wellington
  • Book: Compounds and Compounding
  • Online publication: 04 October 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108235679.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Laurie Bauer, Victoria University of Wellington
  • Book: Compounds and Compounding
  • Online publication: 04 October 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108235679.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Laurie Bauer, Victoria University of Wellington
  • Book: Compounds and Compounding
  • Online publication: 04 October 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108235679.010
Available formats
×