Book contents
- Complex Words
- Complex Words
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction: Advances in Morphology
- Part I Lexico-Semantic Aspects of Complex Words
- Part II Structure of Complex Words
- Part III Corpus-Based Case Studies
- 13 Competition between Synthetic NN Compounds and NN.gen Phrasal Nouns in Polish
- 14 An S Is an ’S, or Is It? Plural and Genitive Plural Are Not Homophonous
- 15 The Role of Word-Formation Families and Subfamilies in the Organization of German Diminutive Compounds
- 16 Semantic Patterns in Noun-to-Verb Conversion in English
- 17 Onomatopoeia
- 18 Dingsbums and Thingy
- Index
- References
17 - Onomatopoeia
On the Crossroads of Sound Symbolism and Word Formation
from Part III - Corpus-Based Case Studies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 September 2020
Book contents
- Complex Words
- Complex Words
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction: Advances in Morphology
- Part I Lexico-Semantic Aspects of Complex Words
- Part II Structure of Complex Words
- Part III Corpus-Based Case Studies
- 13 Competition between Synthetic NN Compounds and NN.gen Phrasal Nouns in Polish
- 14 An S Is an ’S, or Is It? Plural and Genitive Plural Are Not Homophonous
- 15 The Role of Word-Formation Families and Subfamilies in the Organization of German Diminutive Compounds
- 16 Semantic Patterns in Noun-to-Verb Conversion in English
- 17 Onomatopoeia
- 18 Dingsbums and Thingy
- Index
- References
Summary
This paper provides a contrastive analysis of English and Slovak onomatopoeia with regard to both its theoretical comprehension in two different linguistic traditions and its characteristics in two typologically different languages. The emphasis is on (i) the onomatopoeia-founded word-formation processes and (ii) the semantic characteristics of complex words derived from onomatopoeia. The latter will focus on the identification of metaphorical and metonymical shifts from the cognitive-semantic point of view. Our sample includes 120 Slovak and 115 English onomatopoetic words. In addition, we argue that (i) onomatopoeia differs from interjections and therefore should not be classified within this class of words, and (ii) the scope of onomatopoeia should not be extended beyond its inherent feature of being imitations of sounds by means of a language-specific system of phonemes. By implication, no complex word derived from onomatopoeia should be treated as genuine onomatopoeia.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Complex WordsAdvances in Morphology, pp. 335 - 361Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Bańko, M. (2008). Wspólczesny polski onomatopeikon: ikoniczność w języku, Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Google Scholar
Bańko, M. (2009). Słownik onomatopei, czyli wyrazów dźwięko- i ruchonaśladowczych, Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Google Scholar
Bauer, L., Lieber, R. and Plag, I. (2014). The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beard, R. (1995). Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology, a General Theory of Inflection and Word Formation, SUNY Linguistic Series, Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Buffa, F. (1966). Slovesné podstatné mená z hľadiska slovotvorného [Verbal nouns in terms of word-formtion]. Slovenská reč, 31, 225–228.Google Scholar
de Smet, H. and Heyvaert, L. (2011). The meaning of the English present participle. English Language and Linguistics, 15(3), 473–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dokulil, M. (1962). Tvoření slov v češtině. Teorie odvozování slov [Word-Formation in Czech. A Theory of Derivation], Praha: Nakladatelství československé akademie věd.Google Scholar
Dvonč, L., Horák, G., Miko, F., Mistrík, J., Oravec, J., Ružička, J. and Urbančok, M. (1966). Morfológia slovenského jazyka [Morphology of the Slovak Language], Bratislava: Vydavatelstvo Slovenskej akadémie vied.Google Scholar
Fanego, T. (2016). The Great Complement Shift revisited: the constructionalization of ACC-ing gerundives. Functions of Language, 23(1), 84–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furdík, J. (2004). Slovenská slovotvorba [Slovak Word-Formation], Ološtiak, M., ed., Prešov: Náuka.Google Scholar
Ivanová, M., Kyseľová, M. and Perovská, V. (2015). Nominačné aspekty slovných druhov [Naming aspects of word-classes]. In Ološtiak, M., ed., Kvalitatívne a kvantitatívne aspekty tvorenia slov v slovenčine. [Qualitative and Quantitative Aspects of Word-Formation in Slovak], Prešov: Filozofická fakulta Prešovskej univerzity v Prešove, pp. 485–625.Google Scholar
Körtvélyessy, L. (2015). Evaluative Morphology from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Körtvélyessy, L. (2020). Onomatopoeia – A Unique Species?. Studia Linguistica. https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z. and Radden, G. (1998). Metonymy: developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 37–77.Google Scholar
Králik, Ľ. (2015). Stručný etymologický slovník slovenčiny [Short Etymological Dictionary of Slovak], Bratislava: VEDA.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Marchand, H. (1960). Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation, Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Ondrus, P., Horecký, J. and Furdík, J. (1980). Súčasný slovenský spisovný jazyk. Lexikológia [Contemporary Literary Slovak. Lexicology], Bratislava: Slovenské pedagogické nakladateľstvo.Google Scholar
Pauliny, E., Ružička, J. and Štolc, J. (1968). Slovenská gramatika [Slovak Grammar], Bratislava: Slovenské pedagogické nakladateľstvo.Google Scholar
Sokolová, M., Ološtiak, M. and Ivanová, M. (2012). Slovník koreňových morfém slovenčiny [Dictionary of Slovak Root Morphemes], Prešov: Vydavateľstvo Prešovskej univerzity.Google Scholar
Szymanek, B. (1989). Introduction to Morphological Analysis, Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Google Scholar