Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:31:37.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The Role of Flows of Energy and Resources in Structuring Ecological and Social Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2018

Charles G. Curtin
Affiliation:
University of Montana
Timothy F. H. Allen
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Complex Ecology
Foundational Perspectives on Dynamic Approaches to Ecology and Conservation
, pp. 220 - 282
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Allen, T. F. and Hoekstra, T.W. (1992). Toward a Unified Ecology: Complexity in Ecological Systems. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, T. F. and Hoekstra, T.W. (2015). Toward a Unified Ecology (second edition). New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binkley, D., Moore, M. M., Rome, M. M. and Brown, P. M. (2006). Was Aldo Leopold right about the Kaibab deer herd? Ecosystems, 9, 227241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boltzmann, L. (1905). Der zweite Haupsatz der mechanishen warme. Almanac der K. Akademie der Wissenschaften Wien 36, 255299.Google Scholar
Brooks, J. L. and Dodson, S. I. (1965). Predation, body size, and composition of plankton. Science, 150, 2835.Google Scholar
Brown, J. H. (1991). Methodological advances: new approaches and methods in ecology. In Real, L. A. and Brown, J. H. (editors), Foundations of Ecology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brown, J. H. (1995). Macroecology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brown, J. H., Ernest, S. K. M, Parody, J. M. and Haskell, J. P. (2001). Regulation of diversity: maintenance of species richness in changing environments. Oecologia, 126, 31332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, J. H. et al. (2004). Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology, 85, 17711789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. H. et al. (2011). Energetic limits to economic growth. BioScience, 61, 1926.Google Scholar
Carpenter, S. R. (1996). Microcosm experiments have limited relevance for community and ecosystem ecology. Ecology, 77, 677680.Google Scholar
Carpenter, S. R. and Leavitt, P. R. (1991). Temporal variation in a paleolimnological record arising from a trophic cascade. Ecology, 72, 277285.Google Scholar
Carpenter, S. R. et al. (1987). Regulation of lake primary productivity by food web structure. Ecology, 68, 18631876.Google Scholar
Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Choi, J. S., Frank, K. T., Petrie, B. D. and Leggett, W. C. (2005). Integrated assessment of a large marine ecosystem: a case study of the devolution of the eastern Scotian Shelf, Canada. Oceanography and Marine Biology, 43, 4767.Google Scholar
Craige, B. J. (2001). Eugene Odum: Ecosystem Ecologist and Environmentalist. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Curtin, C. G. (2015). The Science of Open Spaces: Theory and Practice for Conserving Large, Complex Systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eddington, A. (1930). The Nature of the Physical World. New York: MacMillian.Google Scholar
Elton, C. (1927). Animal Ecology. London: William Clowes and Sons.Google Scholar
Estes, J. A. and Palmisano, J. F. (1974). Sea otters: their role in structuring nearshore communities. Science, 185, 10581060.Google Scholar
Estes, J. A., Tinker, M. T., Williams, T. M. and Doak, D. F. (1998). Killer whale predation on sea otters linking oceanic and nearshore ecosystems. Science, 282, 473476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Estes, J. A. et al. (2011). Trophic downgrading of planet Earth. Science, 333, 301306.Google Scholar
Forbes, S. A. (1887). The lake as a microcosm. Bulletin of the Peoria Scientific Association. Reprinted in Real, L. A. and Brown, J. H. (editors), (1991), Foundations of Ecology, pp. 7787. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gell-Mann, M. (2001). Thinkers’ Forum. Presented by the Economic Club of Chicago in conjunction with the Santa Fe Institute, 10th April 2001. Red Lacquer Ballroom, The Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Golley, F. B. (1993). A History of the Ecosystem Concept in Ecology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hairston, N. G., Smith, F. E. and Slobodkin, L. B. (1960). Community structure, population control and competition. The American Naturalist, 94, 421425.Google Scholar
Hall, C. A. S. and Odum, H. T. (1995). Maximum Power: The Ideas and Applications of H. T. Odum. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Press.Google Scholar
Hau, J. L. and Bakshi, B. R. (2004). Promise and problems of energy analysis. Ecological Modelling, 178, 215225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, J. (1995). Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. New York: Helix Books.Google Scholar
Holland, J. (1998). Emergence: From Chaos to Order. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurlbert, S. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54, 187211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juday, C. (1940). The annual energy budget of an inland lake. Ecology, 21, 438450.Google Scholar
Kauffman, S. (1993). Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffman, S. (1996). At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kay, J. J. (1984). Self-Organization in Living Systems. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Kay, J. J. (1999). Ecosystems as self-organization holarctic open systems: narratives and the second law of thermodynamics. In Jorgensen, S. E. and Muller, F. (editors), Handbook of Ecosystem Theories and Management, pp. 135160. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press – Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar
Kay, J. J. (2002). Thermodynamic Musings. www.jameskay.ca/musings/thermomusings.pdf.Google Scholar
Kingsland, S. E. (1991). Foundational papers: defining ecology as a science. In Real, L. A. and Brown, J. H. (editors), Foundations of Ecology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Krebs, C. (2008). Ecology: The Experimental Analysis of the Distribution and Abundances of Species. New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
Krotov, D., Dubuis, J. O., Gregor, T. and Bialek, W. (2014). Morphogenesis at criticality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 36833688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langton, C. G. (1990). Computation at the edge of chaos. Physica, D42, 1237.Google Scholar
Leopold, A. (1941). Lakes in relation to terrestrial life patterns. In A Symposium on Hydrobiology, pp. 1722. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County Almanac. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewin, R. (1999). Complexity: Life at the Edge of Chaos. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lindeman, R. L. (1942). The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology. Ecology, 23, 399417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lotka, A. J. (1922). Natural selection as a physical principle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 8, 151154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ludwig, D. (2001). The era of management is over. Ecosystems, 4, 758764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnuson, J. J. (1990). Long-term ecological research and the invisible present. BioScience, 40, 495501.Google Scholar
Mandelbrot, B. B. (1977). The Fractal Geometry of Nature. New York: W. H. Freeman & Company.Google Scholar
Månsson, B. Å. and McGlade, J. M. (1993). Ecology, thermodynamics and HT Odum’s conjectures. Oecologia, 93, 582596.Google Scholar
May, R. M. (1976). Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics. Nature, 261, 459–67.Google Scholar
McMahon, T. A. and Bonner, J. T. (1983). On Size and Life. New York: Scientific American Library.Google Scholar
Merchant, C. (2002). The Columbia Guide to Environmental History. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Niklas, K. J. (1994). Plant Allometry: The Scaling of Form and Process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Odum, E. P. (1953). Fundamentals of Ecology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.Google Scholar
Odum, E. P. (1969). The strategy of ecosystem development. Science, 164, 262270.Google Scholar
Odum, H. T. (1957). Trophic structure and productivity of Silver Springs, Florida. Ecological Monographs, 27, 55112.Google Scholar
Odum, H. T. and Odum, E. P. (1955). Trophic structure and productivity of a windward coral reef community on Eniwetok Atoll. Ecological Monographs, 25, 291320.Google Scholar
Odum, H. T. and Pinkerton, R. C. (1955). Time’s speed regulator: the optimum efficiency for maximum power output in physical and biological systems. American Scientist, 43, 331343.Google Scholar
O’Neill, R. V. (2001). Is it time to bury the ecosystem concept? (with full military honors, of course!). Ecology, 82, 275284.Google Scholar
Pace, M. L. (2001). Getting it right and wrong: extrapolations across experimental scales. In Gardner, R. H., Kemp, W. M., Kennedy, V. S. and Peterson, J. E. (editors), Scaling Relations in Experimental Ecology, pp. 157177. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Paine, R. T. (1980). Food webs: linkage interaction strength, and community infrastructure. Journal of Animal Ecology, 49, 667685.Google Scholar
Pauley, D., Christensen, V., Dalsgaard, J., Froese, R. and Torres, F. (1998). Fishing down marine food webs. Science, 279, 860863.Google Scholar
Peet, R. K. (1991). Lessons from nature: case studies in natural systems. In Real, L. A. and Brown, J. H. (editors), Foundations of Ecology, pp. 605615. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Peters, R. H. (1984). The Ecological Implications of Body Size. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pianka, E. (1978). Evolutionary Ecology (second edition). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Prigogine, I. (1978). Time structure and fluctuations. Science, 201, 777785.Google Scholar
Prigogine, I. and Nicolis, G. (1977). Self-Organization in Non-Equilibrium Systems. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Redfield, A. C. (1958). The biological control of chemical factors in the environment. American Scientist, 46, 205–221.Google Scholar
Ripple, W. J. and Beschta, R. L. (2012). Trophic cascades in Yellowstone: the first 15 years after wolf reintroduction. Biological Conservation, 145, 205213.Google Scholar
Samaniego, H. and Moses, M.E. (2008). Cities as organisms: allometric scaling of urban road networks. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 1, 2139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schindler, D. W. (1998). Whole-ecosystem experiments: replication versus realism: the need for ecosystem-scale experiments. Ecosystems, 1, 323334.Google Scholar
Schindler, D. W. (2006). Recent advances in the understanding and management of eutrophication. Limnology and Oceanography, 51, 356–363.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Nielson, K. (1984). Why is Animal Size so Important? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, D. E. and Kay, J. J. (1994). Life as a manifestation of the second law of thermodynamics. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 19, 2548.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1944). What is Life, Mind and Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sciubba, E. (2011). What did Lotka really say? A critical reassessment of the “maximum power principle.” Ecological Modeling, 222, 13471353.Google Scholar
Shapiro, J., Lamarra, V. and Lynch, M. (1975). Biomanipulation: an ecosystem approach to lake restoration. In Brezonik, P. L. and Fox, J. L. (editors), Proceedings of a Symposium on Water Quality Management Through Biological Control, pp. 8596. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press.Google Scholar
Simberloff, D. (1980). A succession of paradigms in ecology: essentialism to materialism and probabilism. Synthese, 43, 339.Google Scholar
Sinclair, A. R. E. and Arcese, P. (1995). Serengeti II: Dynamics, Management, and Conservation of an Ecosystem. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Steneck, R. S., Vavrinec, J. and Leland, A. V. (2004). Accelerating trophic-level dysfunction in kelp forest ecosystems of the western Gulf of Maine. Ecosystems, 7, 323332.Google Scholar
Sterner, R. W. and Elser, J. J. (2002). Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tansley, A. G. (1935). The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology, 16, 284307.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. J. (2005). Unruly Complexity: Ecology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, S. et al. (2014). Applications and implications of ecological energetics. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 29, 280290.Google Scholar
Transeau, E. N. (1926). The accumulation of energy by plants. Ohio Journal of Science, 26(1), 110.Google Scholar
Ulanowicz, R. E. (1999). Life after Newton: an ecological metaphysic. BioSystems, 50, 127142.Google Scholar
Waltner-Toews, D., Kay, J. J. and Lister, N. E. (2008). The Ecosystem Approach: Complexity, Uncertainty, and Managing for Sustainability. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Watt, K. (1966). Systems Analysis in Ecology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Watt, K. (1968). Ecology and Resource Management: A Quantitative Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
West, G. B. (2007). Innovation and growth: size matters. Harvard Business Review, 85, 3435.Google Scholar
Worster, D. (1977). Nature’s Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Worster, D. (1990). Ecology of order and chaos. Environmental History Review, 14, 118.Google Scholar
Wu, J. and Loucks, O. L. (1995). From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: a paradigm shift in ecology. Quarterly Review of Biology, 70, 439466.Google Scholar
Yu, Q. et al. (2010). Linking stoichiometric homoeostasis with ecosystem structure, functioning, and stability. Ecology Letters, 13, 13901399.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×