Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T18:07:02.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Six - Regional Organizations in Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2021

Diana Panke
Affiliation:
Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany
Sören Stapel
Affiliation:
Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany
Anna Starkmann
Affiliation:
Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany
Get access

Summary

While only a few ROs existed shortly after the end of WWII, they have mushroomed in all regions over the past 70 years and sparked a revival of the comparative regionalism research agenda. A few ROs in Asia are the focus of research, such as ASEAN and the SCO (Ambrosio, 2008; Nesadurai, 2008; Nguitragool and Rüland, 2015; Dosch, 2017; Spandler, 2019; Scott-Smith, 2020), but most organizations do not attract much scholarly consideration. This is unfortunate as there are a dozen more ROs in the Asian region that deserve attention, especially from a systematic and comparative perspective (Spandler, 2020).

To overcome this shortcoming, this chapter provides an analysis of the particularities in the creation and dissolution of all 19 Asian ROs. It examines regional cooperation by studying how Asian ROs developed over time with respect to state membership and policy competencies. The chapter ends with reflections on where Asian ROs are placed in the typology of ROs. This typology is based on two dimensions, membership size and policy scope, with important implications for regional governance on a day-to-day basis (see Chapter 2).

Regionalism in Asia is not characterized by multiple waves of regional integration as observed in Europe and the Americas. This chapter points out not only that there is an inclination to address transnational problems in informal ways (Acharya, 1997; Kim, 2007), but also that Asian ROs have evolved incrementally since the end of the 1970s, becoming larger in size and broader in scope. Additionally, the analysis shows that all but two Asian ROs – Asia Cooperation Dialogue (ACD) and Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) – were initially small selective in character. By 2015, the small selective type still dominated (ten) but was complemented by three large encompassing and three small encompassing as well as one large selective RO.

Membership dynamics in Asian Ros

Since 1945, 19 ROs have been created in Asia and only two have been dissolved (Table 6.1). The oldest Asian RO is the Pacific Community (SPC), whose predecessor, the South Pacific Commission, was founded in February 1947 by Australia, New Zealand and the then colonial powers France, the United Kingdom (UK) (until 2004), the Netherlands (until 1962) and the US. SEATO was created in 1954 by Australia, New Zealand, Pakistan, the Philippines and Thailand as well as the UK, France and the US.

Type
Chapter
Information
Comparing Regional Organizations
Global Dynamics and Regional Particularities
, pp. 83 - 100
Publisher: Bristol University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Regional Organizations in Asia
  • Diana Panke, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany, Sören Stapel, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany, Anna Starkmann, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany
  • Book: Comparing Regional Organizations
  • Online publication: 12 March 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529209488.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Regional Organizations in Asia
  • Diana Panke, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany, Sören Stapel, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany, Anna Starkmann, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany
  • Book: Comparing Regional Organizations
  • Online publication: 12 March 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529209488.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Regional Organizations in Asia
  • Diana Panke, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany, Sören Stapel, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany, Anna Starkmann, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany
  • Book: Comparing Regional Organizations
  • Online publication: 12 March 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529209488.007
Available formats
×