Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T05:34:00.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Meeting the Challenges of Global Communication and Political Integration: The Significance of Comparative Research in a Changing World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2009

Frank Esser
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Mass Communication, University of Missouri, Columbia
Barbara Pfetsch
Affiliation:
Professor of Communication and Media Policy, University of Hohenheim, Germany
Frank Esser
Affiliation:
University of Missouri, Columbia
Barbara Pfetsch
Affiliation:
Freie Universität Berlin
Get access

Summary

This volume argues in favor of increasing consideration of international comparison in political communication research. From our point of view, the potential of comparative research to contribute to knowledge is promising in many respects (Blumler and Gurevitch 1995a):

  • Comparative analysis expands the existing database, and by doing so, simplifies generalization and refines theories of political communication research.

  • Comparative analysis provides an antidote to naïve universalism, countering the tendency to presume that political communication findings from one's own country also apply to other countries. It thereby helps to prevent parochialism and ethnocentrism.

  • Comparative analysis is a way of enhancing the understanding of one's own society by placing its familiar structures and routines against those of other systems. Comparison makes us aware of other systems, cultures, and patterns of thinking and acting – casting a fresh light on our own political communication arrangements and enabling us to contrast them critically with those prevalent in other countries.

  • Comparative analysis can be used as a key to discern general findings from culture-specific ones by rendering visible the specific identity of political communication arrangements within a given system. Only a cross-national perspective can draw our attention to the macrosocietal structures and imperatives that are taken for granted within our own system, and can thus only be detected from an outside perspective, that is, by comparing.

  • Another advantage of comparative analysis lies in the wealth of practical knowledge and experience it offers. As we gain access to a wide range of alternative options, problem solutions, and reforms, comparative research can show us a way out of similar dilemmas or predicaments – as long as these solutions can be adapted to our own national context.

  • […]

Type
Chapter
Information
Comparing Political Communication
Theories, Cases, and Challenges
, pp. 384 - 410
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, Gabriel A., and G. Bingham Powell. 1966. Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach. An Analytic Study. Boston: Little Brown & Co
Almond, Gabriel A., G. Bingham Powell, Kaare Strom, and Russell J. Dalton, eds. 2003. Comparative Politics Today: A World View. Updated 7th edition. New York: Longman
Beck, Ulrich. 2000. What is Globalization? Cambridge: Polity
Blumler, Jay G., and Michael Gurevitch. 1995a. Comparative Research: The Extending Frontier. In Jay G. Blumler and Michael Gurevitch, eds. The Crisis of Public Communication. London: Routledge, pp. 73–85
Blumler, Jay G., and Michael Gurevitch. 1995b. The Formation of Campaign Agendas in the United States and Britain. In Jay G. Blumler and Michael Gurevitch, eds. The Crisis of Public Communication. London: Routledge, pp. 86–96
Blumler, Jay G., and Michael Gurevitch. 2001. Americanization Reconsidered: UK-US Campaign Communication Comparisons Across Time. In W. Lance Bennett and Robert M. Entman, eds. Mediated Politics. Communication in the Future of Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 380–403
Blumler, Jay G., Jack M. McLeod, and Karl Erik Rosengren. 1992. An Introduction to Comparative Communication Research. In Jay G. Blumler, Jack M. McLeod, and Karl Erik Rosengren, eds. Comparatively Speaking: Communication and Culture Across Space and Time. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 3–18
Chan, Joseph Man. 2001. Media, Democracy and Globalization: A Comparative Framework. Javnost – The Public 8 (4): 103–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crofts, Wiley, Stephen, B.. 2004. Rethinking Nationality in the Context of Globalization. Communication Theory 14 (1): 78–96Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. 1991. Reflections on the Spiral of Silence. In James A. Anderson, ed. Communication Yearbook 14. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 288–97
Gunther, Richard and Anthony Mughan. 2000. Democracy and the Media. A Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Jahn, Detlef. 2002. The Impact of Globalization on Comparative Analysis. Paper presented to the 43rd. Annual ISA Convention on “Dissolving Boundaries: The Nexus between Comparative Politics and International Relations,” New Orleans, March 24–7
Jarren, Otfried, and Patrick Donges. 2002. Politische Kommunikation in der Mediengesellschaft. Eine Einführung. 2 vols. Wiesbaden, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag
Kepplinger, Hans Mathias, Hans-Bernd, Brosius, and Joachim, Friedrich Staab. 1991. Instrumental Actualization: A Theory of Mediated Conflicts. European Journal of Communication 6: 263–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, Melvin L. 1989. Introduction. In Melvin L. Kohn, ed. Cross-National Research in Sociology. Newbury Park, CA Sage, pp. 17–31
Landman, Todd. 2003. Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics: An Introduction. Updated 2nd ed. London: Routledge
Lee, Chin-Chuan, Joseph Man Chan, Zhongdang Pan, and Clement Y. K. So. 2000. National Prisms of a Global Media Event. In James Curran and Michael Gurevitch, eds. Mass Media and Society. London: Arnold, pp. 295–309
Luhmann, Niklas. 1997. Globalization or World Society: How to Conceive of Modern Society?International Review of Sociology 7: 67–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzoleni, Gianpietro, and Winfried, Schulz. 1999. Mediatization of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy?Political Communication 16: 247–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLuhan, Marshall. 1962. The Gutenberg Galaxy. London: Routledge
McMichael, Philip. 2000. World-Systems Analysis, Globalization, and Incorporated Comparison. Journal of World-Systems Research 3: 668–90. Available on the World Wide Web at http://csf.colorado.edu/jwsrCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Thomas. 2002. Media Democracy. How the Media Colonize Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press
Morris, Nancy, and Silvio Waisbord, eds. 2001. Media and Globalization: Why the State Matters. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
Norris, Pippa. 2000. A Virtuous Circle. Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies. New York: Cambridge
Norris, Pippa. 2002. Campaign Communication. In Lawrence LeDuc, Richard G. Niemi, and Pippa Norris, eds. Comparing Communication 2. New Challenges in the Study of Elections and Voting. London: Sage, pp. 127–47
Pfetsch, Barbara. 1998. Government News Management. In Doris Graber, Denis McQuail, and Pippa Norris, eds. The Politics of News – The News of Politics. Washington: CQ Press, pp. 70–93
Pfetsch, Barbara. 2001. Political Communication Culture in the United States and Germany. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 6: 46–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plasser, Fritz. 2002. Global Political Campaigning. A Worldwide Analysis of Campaign Professionals and Their Practices. Westport, CT: Praeger
Przeworski, Adam, and Teune, Henry. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. Malabar, FL: Krieger
Semetko, Holli A. 1996. Political Balance on Television. Campaigns in the United States, Britain and Germany. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 1: 51–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semetko, Holli A., Jay G. Blumler, Michael Gurevitch, and David H. Weaver. 1991. The Formation of Campaign Agendas. A Comparative Analysis of Party and Media Roles in Recent American and British Elections. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates
Semetko, Holli, and Andreina Mandelli. 1997. Setting the Agenda for Cross-National Research: Bringing Values Into the Concept. In Maxwell McCombs, Donald L. Shaw, and David Weaver, eds. Communication and Democracy. Exploring the Intellectual Frontiers in Agenda-Setting Theory. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates, pp. 195–207
Shaw, Martin. 1997. The Theoretical Challenge of Global Society. In Annabelle Sreberny-Mohammadi, Dwayne Winseck, Jim McKenna, and Oliver Boyd-Barrett, eds. Media in Global Context. A Reader. London: Arnold, pp. 27–36
Stevenson, Robert L. 1998. The Missing Link in International Communication. In Christina Holtz-Bacha, Helmut Scherer, and Norbert Waldmann, eds. Wie die Medien die Welt erschaffen und wie die Menschen darin leben. Wiesbaden, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 143–53
Swanson, David L., and Paolo Mancini. 1996. Patterns of Modern Election Campaigning and Their Consequences. In David L. Swanson and Paolo Mancini, eds. Politics, Media and Modern Democracy. An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences. Westport, CT: Praeger, pp. 247–76
Tomlinson, John. 1999. Globalization and Culture. Cambridge: Polity
Van de Vijver, Fons, and Kwok Leung. 1997. Methods and Data Analysis for Cross-Cultural Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Vijver, Fons, and Kwok, Leung. 2000. Methodological Issues in Psychological Research Culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 31: 33–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanta, Wayne, Pu-tsung, King, and Maxwell, E. McCombs. 1995. A Comparison of Factors Influencing Issue Diversity in the U.S. and Taiwan. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 7 (4): 353–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, David, Maxwell McCombs, and Donald Shaw 1998. International Trends in Agenda-Setting Research. In Christina Holtz-Bacha, Helmut Scherer, and Norbert Waldmann, eds. Wie die Medien die Welt erschaffen und wie die Menschen darin leben. Wiesbaden, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 189–203

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×