Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T00:20:48.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - The views of disabled people

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2009

Michael P. Barnes
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Harriet Radermacher
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Get access

Summary

Overview

The content of this chapter contains the essence of what rehabilitation should, logically and ideally, be about. Rehabilitation is a service that has been developed for disabled people; thus common sense should dictate that disabled people themselves should be asked what they want out of the service. Unfortunately, due to political and historical influences, this has often not been the case.

Disabled people have been voicing their needs for some time now, but this has largely fallen on deaf ears. Developments within the last few decades have demonstrated that these are not only needs, but they also constitute basic human rights. This in turn has led to some international changes in the legislative framework. Despite growing acknowledgement of their discrimination, many disabled people still feel that the healthcare service fails them. Often needs are assumed, without disabled people being asked directly, which has resulted in ineffective systems of care. This has meant that disabled people have had to find their own solutions to problems. One such solution has been through the development of independent living centres. This service evolved from the principles of the social model of disability (see Chapter 3), and often negates any input by qualified health and social care professionals. The relationship between such centres and traditional rehabilitative institutions varies enormously, often being nonexistent. By combining the academic background of health professionals with the first-hand experience of disabled people themselves, there is enormous scope for establishing a mutually beneficial arrangement.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, S. (1999). Planning and implementation of care: the patient's role. British Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation 6, 398–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, C. (1991). Disabled People in Britain and Discrimination: a Case for Anti-discrimination Legislation. London: Hurst
Beardshaw, V. (1988). Last on the List: Community Services for People with Physical Disabilities. London: King's Fund Institute
Bowen, R. E. (1994). The use of occupational therapists in independent living programs. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 48, 105–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradshaw, J. (1977). The concept of social need. In Planning for Social Welfare Issues, Models and Tasks, ed. N. Gilbert and H. Specht. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
Buscherhof, J. R. (1998). From abled to disabled: a life transition. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 5, 19–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cant, R. (1997). Rehabilitation following stroke: a participant perspective. Disability Rehabilitation 19, 297–304CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Condeluci, A., Ferris, L. L. and Bogdan, A. (1992). Outcome and value: the survivor perspective. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 7, 37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, K. (1996). Disability and legislation. In Beyond Disability: Towards an Enabling Society, ed. G. Hales, pp. 124–33. Bristol, PA: The Open University
DeJong, G. (1979). Independent living: from social movement to analytic paradigm. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 60, 435–46Google Scholar
Ferris, L. (1992). The Outcome Rating Scale: a Survivor Perspective. Pittsburgh, PA: United Cerebral Palsy
French, S. (1994). Disabled people and professional practice. In On Equal Terms, ed. S. French, pp. 103–18. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann
French, S. and Swain, J. (2001). The relationship between disabled people and health and welfare professionals. In Handbook of Disability Studies, ed. G. L. Albrecht, K. D. Seelman and M. Bury. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage PublicationsCrossRef
Fuhrer, M. J., Rossi, D. and Gerken, L. (1990). Relationships between independent living centers and medical rehabilitation programs. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 71, 519–22Google ScholarPubMed
Hampton, M. M. K. (1993). An international overview of resource centres on disability. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 47, 725–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, J. (1999). Health care access and equality for disabled people. British Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation 6, 380–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchison, P., Pedlar, A., Lord, J. et al. (1996). The impact of independent living resource centres in Canada on people with disabilities. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation 10, 99–112Google Scholar
Hutchison, P., Pedlar, A., Dunn, P. et al. (2000). Canadian Independent Living Centres: impact on the community. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 23, 61–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janson, L. (2000). Sweat, patience, and perseverance. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 6, 60–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, B. (1996). Disabled people and the equal opportunities movement. In Beyond Disability: Towards an Enabling Society, ed. G. Hales, pp. 88–95. Bristol, PA: The Open University
Lysack, C. and Kaufert, J. (1994). Comparing the origins and ideologies of the independent living movement and community based rehabilitation. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 17, 231–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacFarlane, A. (1996). Aspects of intervention: Consultation, care, help and support. In Beyond Disability: Towards an Enabling Society, ed. G. Hales, pp. 6–18. Bristol, PA: The Open University
Marks, L. (1991). Home and Hospital Care: Redrawing the Boundaries. London: King's Fund Institute
McKevitt, C. and Wolfe, C. (2000). Community support after stroke: patient and carer views. British Journal of Therapy Rehabilitation 7, 6–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, J. (1993). Community care or independent living. In Independent Lives?: Community Care and Disabled People. London: MacMillan PressCrossRef
Newborn, B. (1998). Quality of life for long term recovery in stroke. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 5, 61–3Google Scholar
Oliver, J. (1995). Counselling Disabled People: a counsellor's perspective. Disability Handicap and Society 10, 261–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, M. (1991). Multispecialist and Multidisciplinary – a recipe for confusion? ‘Too many cooks spoil the broth’. Disability Handicap and Society 6, 65–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pot, J. W. G. A. (1999). Development of a needs assessment system in rehabilitation. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 22, 155–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priestley, M. A. (1999). Disability Politics and Community Care. New York: Jessica Kingsley Publishers
Radermacher, H. (2000). Review of the Regional Neurological Rehabilitation Services. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Newcastle City Health NHS Trust
Roberts, E. V. (1989). A history of the Independent Living Movement: a founder's perspective. In Psychosocial Interventions with Physically Disabled Persons, ed. B. Heller, L. Flohr and L. Zegans, pp. 231–51. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press
Sabari, J. S., Meisler, J. and Silver, E. (2000). Reflections upon rehabilitation by members of a community based stroke club. Disability and Rehabilitation 22, 330–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scullion, P. (2000). From exclusion to inclusion: a key role for rehabilitation staff. British Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation 7, 105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherry, M. (1999). Re: Brain Injury. Disability research mailbase. http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/wa.exe?A2=ind9910&L=disability-research&P=R22407. 25 Accessed June 2001
Silburn, R. (1988). Disabled People: their Needs and Priorities. Nottingham: Benefits Research Unit, Department of Social Policy and Administration, University of Nottingham
Stephens, J. (1998). The Needs of Severely Disabled People Living at Home: how do Severely Disabled People Living at Home Manage their Health Care Needs?Action Aid Disability News 9, 51–5Google Scholar
Sullivan, M. J. L., Irving, C., Jamieson, P., et al. (1997). Involving consumers with disabilities in Nova Scotia's reformed health system. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation 10, 307–14Google Scholar
Swain, P. (1993). Helping disabled people – the user's view. British Medical Journal 306, 990–2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vasey, S. (1996). The experience of care. In Beyond Disability: Towards an Enabling Society, ed. G. Hales, pp. 82–7. Bristol, PA: The Open University
Wendell, S. (1996). The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability. New York: Routledge

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×