Book contents
- Coarse Grained Simulation and Turbulent Mixing
- Coarse Grained Simulation and Turbulent Mixing
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Prologue
- Part I Fundamentals
- 1 Proof of Concept
- 2 A Minimum Turbulence State for Coarse Grained Simulation
- 3 Finite Scale Theory
- 4 Material Conservation of Passive Scalar Mixing in Finite Scale Navier Stokes Fluid Turbulence
- Part II Challenges
- Part III Complex Mixing Consequences
- Index
- Plate section
- References
2 - A Minimum Turbulence State for Coarse Grained Simulation
from Part I - Fundamentals
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2016
By
Edited by
Book contents
- Coarse Grained Simulation and Turbulent Mixing
- Coarse Grained Simulation and Turbulent Mixing
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Prologue
- Part I Fundamentals
- 1 Proof of Concept
- 2 A Minimum Turbulence State for Coarse Grained Simulation
- 3 Finite Scale Theory
- 4 Material Conservation of Passive Scalar Mixing in Finite Scale Navier Stokes Fluid Turbulence
- Part II Challenges
- Part III Complex Mixing Consequences
- Index
- Plate section
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Coarse Grained Simulation and Turbulent Mixing , pp. 30 - 47Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Nelkin, M., “Universality and scaling in fully developed turbulence,” Adv. in Phys., 43, 143–181, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y., and Speziale, C.G., “Advances in the fundamental aspects of turbulence, energy transfer, interacting scales, and self-preservation in isotropic decay,” Appl. Mech. Rev., 51, 267, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moin, P., and Kim, J., “Tracking turbulence with supercomputers,” Scientific American, 276, 62–68, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y., Matthaeus, W.H., and Dmitruk, P., “Magnetohydrodynamic turbulence and time scales in astrophysical and space plasma,” Rev. Mod. Phys., 76, 1015–1035, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, G.K., Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1953.Google Scholar
Saddoughi, S.G. and Veeravalli, S.V., “Local isotropy in turbulent boundary layers at high Reynolds number,” J. Fluid Mech., 268, 333, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez, J., “Computing high-Reynolds-number turbulence: Will simulation ever replace experiments?,” J. Turbulence, 4(022), 1–14, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S.B., “Ten questions concerning the large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows,” New J. Phys., 6(35), 1–24, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burattini, P., Lavole, P., and Antonia, R.A., “On the normalized energy dissipation rate,” Phys. Fluids, 17(098103), 1–4, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sreenivasan, K.R., “On the scaling of the turbulence energy dissipation rate,” Phys. Fluids, 27, 1048–1051, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sreenivasan, K.R., “An update on the energy dissipation rate in isotropic turbulence,” Phys. Fluids, 10, 528–529, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keneda, Y., Ishihara, T., Yokokawa, M., Itakura, K., and Uno, A., “Energy dissipation rate and energy spectrum in high resolution direct numerical simulations of turbulence in a periodic box,” Phys. Fluids, 15, L21–24, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, B.R., Krogstad, P.-A., and van de Water, W., “Measurements of the turbulent energy dissipation rate,” Phys. Fluids, 14, 1288–1290, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y., Hossain, M., and Vahala, G., “A critical look at the use of filters in large eddy simulation,” Phys. Lett. A, 139, 330–332, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, A., “Energy cascade in large-eddy simulations of turbulent fluid flows,” Adv. Geophy. S., 18A, 237–248, 1974.Google Scholar
Germano, M., “Differential filters for the large eddy simulation of turbulent flows,” Phys. Fluids, 29, 1755–1757, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langford, J.A. and Moser, R.D., “Optimal LES formulations for isotropic turbulence,” J. Fluid Mech., 398, 321–346, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domaradzki, J.A. and Loh, K.-C., “The subgrid-scale estimation model in the physical space representation,” Phys. Fluids, 11, 2330–2342, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domaradzki, J.A. and Adams, N.A., “Direct modelling of subgrid scales of turbulence in large eddy simulations,” J. of Turbulence, 3(024), 1–19, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y., “Eddy damping, backscatter, and subgrid stresses in subgrid modeling of turbulence, “Phys. Rev. A, 43, 7049–7052, 1991.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, Y. and Vahala, G., “Reformulation of recursive-renormalization-group based subgrid modeling of turbulence,” Phys. Rev. E, 47, 2503–2519, 1993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kraichnan, R.H., “Eddy viscosity in two and three dimensions,” J. Atmos. Sci., 33, 1521–1536, 1976.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois, T., Jauberteau, F., and Zhou, Y., “Influences of subgrid scale dynamics on resolvable scale statistics in large-eddy simulations,” Physica D, 100, 390–406, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, H.A., “Eddy diffusivity, eddy noise, and subgrid-scale modelling,” J. Fluid Mech., 81, 719–734, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y., Vahala, G., and Hossain, M., “Renormalization-group theory for the eddy viscosity in subgrid modeling,” Phys. Rev. A, 37, 2590–2598, 1988.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, Y., Vahala, G., and Hossain, M., “Renormalization eddy viscosity and Kolmogorov’s constant in forced Navier-Stokes turbulence,” Phys. Rev. A., 40, 5865–5874, 1989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dimotakis, P.E., “The mixing transition in turbulent flows,” J. Fluid Mech., 409, 69–98, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y., “Unification and extension of the concepts of similarity criteria and mixing transition for studying astrophysics using high energy density laboratory experiments or numerical simulations,” Phys. Plasmas, 14, 082701, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y., Robey, H.F., and Buckingham, A.C., “Onset of turbulence in accelerated high-Reynolds-number flow,” Phys. Rev. E, 67, 056305, 1–11, 2003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, Y., Remington, B.A., Robey, H.F., et al., “Progress in understanding turbulent mixing induced by Rayleigh-Taylor and Richtmyer-Meshkov instability,” Phys. Plasma, 10, 1883–1896, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domaradzki, J.A. and Rogallo, R.S., “Local energy transfer and non-local interactions in homogeneous, isotropic turbulence,” Phys. Fluids A, 2, 413–426, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y., “Degree of locality of energy transfer in the inertial range,” Phys. Fluids A, 5, 1092–1094, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y., “Interacting scales and energy transfer in isotropic turbulence,” Phys. Fluids A, 5, 2511–2524, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y., “Renormalization group theory for fluid and plasma turbulence,” Phys. Report, 488, 1, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraichnan, R.H., “Inertial range transfer in two- and three-dimensional turbulence,” J. Fluid Mech., 47, 525–535, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gotoh, T. and Watanabe, T., “Statistics of transfer fluxes of the kinetic energy and scalar variance,” J. of Turbulence, 6(33), 1–18, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaneda, Y., “Renormalization expansions in the theory of turbulence with the use of the Lagrangian position function,” J. Fluid Mech, 107, 131, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y. and Oughton, S., “Nonlocality and the critical Reynolds numbers of the minimum state magnetohydrodynamic turbulence,” Phys. Plasma, 18, 072304, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y., Buckingham, A.C., Bataille, F., and Mathelin, L., “Manimum state for high Reynolds and Peclet number turbulent flows,” Phys. Lett. A., 373, 2746, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domaradzki, J.A., Liu, W., and Brachet, M. E., “An analysis of subgrid-scale interactions in numerically simulated isotropic turbulence,” Phys. Fluids A 5, 1747, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domaradzki, J.A., Liu, W., Hartel, C., and Kleiser, L., “Energy transfer in numerically simulated wall-bounded turbulent flows,” Phys. Fluids, 6, 1583, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, D.O., Chen, S., Dolen, G.D., Kraichnan, R.H., Wang, L.P., and Zhou, Y., “Energy spectrum in the dissipation range of fluid turbulence,” J. Plasma Phys., 57, 195, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G. I., “The instability of liquid surfaces when accelerated in a direction perpendicular to their plane,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 201, 192, 1950.Google Scholar
Richtmyer, R. D., “Taylor instability in shock acceleration of compressible fluids,” Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 13, 297, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meshkov, E. E., “Instability of the interface of two gases accelerated by a shock wave,” Izv., Acad. Sci., USSR Fluid Dyn., 4, 101, 1969.Google Scholar
Stokes, G.G., “On the effect of the internal friction of fluids on the motion of pendulums,” Trans. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 9, 8, 1901.Google Scholar
Tennekes, H. and Lumley, J.L., First Course in Turbulence, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurricane, O.A., Hansen, J.F., Robey, H.F., et al., “A high energy density shock driven Kelvin–Helmholtz shear layer experiment,” Phys. Plasma, 16(5), p056305, 2008.Google Scholar
Haines, B.M., Grinstein, F.F., Welser-Sherrill, L., et al., “Analysis of the effects of energy deposition on shock-driven turbulent mixing,” Phys. Plasma, 20(7), 072306, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welser-Sherrill, L., Fincke, J., Doss, F., et al., “Two laser-driven mix experiments to study reshock and shear,” High Energy Density Phys., 9(3), 496, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haines, B.M., Grinstein, F.F., Welser-Sherrill, L., et al., “Simulation ensemble for a laser-driven shear experiment,” Phys. Plasma, 20(9), 092301, 2013.Google Scholar
Grinstein, F.F., Gowandhan, A.A., et al., “On coarse-grained simulations of turbulent material mixing,” Physica Scripta, 86(5), 058203, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smalyk, V.A., Hansen, J.F., and Hurricane, O.A., “Experimental observations of turbulent mixing due to Kelvin–Helmholtz instability on the OMEGA Laser Facility,” Phys. Plasma, 19(9), 092702, 2012.Google Scholar
Gowandhan, A.A. and Grinstein, F.F., “Numerical simulation of Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities in shocked gas curtains,” J. Turbulence, 12, pN43, 2012.Google Scholar
Hurricane, O.A., Smalyk, V.A., Raman, K., et al., “Validation of a turbulent Kelvin–Helmholtz shear layer model using a high-energy-density OMEGA laser experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 109(15), 2012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Stefano, C.A., Kuranz, C.C., Keiter, P.A., et al., “Late-time breakup of laser-driven hydrodynamics experiments,” High Energy Density Phys., 8(4), 360, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurricane, O.A., Smalyk, V.A., Hansen, J.F., et al., “Measurements of turbulent mixing due to Kelvin–Helmholtz instability in high-energy-density plasmas,” High Energy Density Phys., 9(1), 47, 2013.Google Scholar
Doss, F.W., Loomis, E.N., Welser-Sherrill, L., et al., “Instability, mixing, and transition to turbulence in a laser-driven counterflowing shear experiment,” Phys. Plasma, 20(1), 012707, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, R.P., Harding, E.C., and Kuranz, C.C., “Approaches to turbulence in high-energy-density experiments,” Physica Scripta, 2008, p014022, 2008.Google Scholar
Grinstein, F.F., Margolin, L.G., and Rider, W.G., editors, Implicit Large Eddy Simulation: Computing Turbulent Flow Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2010.Google Scholar
Zhou, Y., Grinstein, F.F., Wachtor, A.J., and Haines, B.M., “Estimating the effective Reynolds number in implicit large eddy simulation,” Phys. Rev. E., 89, 013303, 2014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falkovich, G., “Bottleneck phenomenon in developed turbulence,” Phys. Fluids, 6, 1411, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeung, P.K. and Zhou, Y., “Universality of the Kolmogorov constant in numerical simulations of turbulence,” Phys. Rev. E., 56, 1746, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
She, Z.S., Chen, S., Doolen, G., Kraichnan, R.H., and Orszag, S.A., “Reynolds number dependence of isotropic Navier-Stokes turbulence,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 70, 3251, 1993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cao, N., Chen, S., and Doolen, G.D., “Statistics and structures of pressure in isotropic turbulence,” Phys. Fluids, 11, 2235, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L.P., Chen, S., Brasseur, J.G., and Wyngaard, J.C., “Examination of hypotheses in the Kolmogorov refined turbulence theory through high- resolution simulations,” J. Fluid Mech., 309, 113, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinstein, F.F., Gowardhan, A.A., and Wachtor, A.J., 2011, “Simulations of Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities in planar shock-tube experiments,” Physics of Fluids, 23, 034106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fureby, C. and Grinstein, F.F., “Monotonically integrated large eddy simulation of free shear flows,” AIAA Journal, 37, 544–556, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, D.H., Woodward, P.R., and Pouquet, A., “Inertial range structures in decaying turbulent flows,” Phys. of Fluids, 10, 237–245, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fureby, C. and Grinstein, F.F., “Large eddy simulation of high Reynolds number free and wall bounded flows,” J. Comput. Phys., 181, 68, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar