Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T01:01:32.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The Tradeoff of Computational Complexity and Achievable Rates in C-RANs

from Part II - Physical-Layer Design in C-RANs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2017

Tony Q. S. Quek
Affiliation:
Singapore University of Technology and Design
Mugen Peng
Affiliation:
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
Osvaldo Simeone
Affiliation:
New Jersey Institute of Technology
Wei Yu
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The trend of increased centralization holds the potential to transform mobile networks in two ways. First, centralization enables the exploitation of common channel knowledge, which in turn allows for significant improvements in the performance of a communication channel by, for instance, performing the joint transmission and reception of signals or allocating resources jointly amongst adjacent cells [1]. Second, centralized processing leverages the trend towards deploying mobile networks on low-cost commodity hardware that is running commodity or open-source software solutions. Deploying software-based implementations increases implementation flexibility, reduces service-creation time, and enables the flexible usage of processing resources through virtualization. In this chapter we use the term Cloud-RAN (C-RAN) to refer to a flexible use of commodity solutions that combines gains in both the telecommunication and information technology domains.

Before implementing the protocol stack of a RAN on a cloud-computing platform, we must also take the required effort into account, e.g., commodity hardware is considered to be less performant and energy efficient than dedicated hardware such as ASIC, DSP, or FPGA. Furthermore, resource virtualization implies an overbooking of resources while satisfying joint resource requirements of all processed base stations (BSs), which is in contrast with fulfilling individual processing constraints at each BS. Centralized signal processing may further impose stringent requirements on the fronthaul network between a radio access point (RAP) and the data center.

So far, research in the area of Cloud-RAN has focused on the telecommunication domain, e.g., the applicability of joint processing approaches, gains from centralization, and optimal degrees of centralization under different side constraints. In this chapter the focus is on the impact of limiting and virtualizing the data processing resources on the communication rate, i.e., the quantitative coupling of the required computational resources and communication rates [2]. After introducing basic notation and definitions, we consider metrics and an analytical framework that allows one to determine the data processing demand Interestingly, the data processing requirements depend not only on the number of information bits but also to a large extent on the quality of a user's communication channel. In this chapter we discuss and quantify multi-user gains, which lower the requirements on the data processing resources to be provided.

Type
Chapter
Information
Cloud Radio Access Networks
Principles, Technologies, and Applications
, pp. 35 - 53
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Irmer, R., Droste, H., Marsch, P., Grieger, M., Fettweis, G., Brueck, S., “Coordinated multipoint: concepts, performance, and field trial results,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 102–111, February 2011.Google Scholar
Rost, P., Talarico, S., and Valenti, M. C., “The complexity–rate tradeoff of centralized radio access networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 6164–6176, November 2015.Google Scholar
3GPP, “Evolved universal terrestrial radio access (e-utra) and evolved universal terrestrial radio access network (E-UTRAN); overall description; stage 2 (release 12).” 3GPP, Technical Report, September 2014.
Domenico, A., Girolamo, M. D., Consonni, M., Salim, U., Ortin, J., Banchs, A., “D5.2: Final definition of iJOIN requirements and scenarios.” EU FP7 project iJOIN, Technical Report, November 2014.Google Scholar
Bhaumik, S., Chandrabose, S. P., Jataprolu, M. K., Kumar, G., Muralidhar, A., Polakos, P., “CloudIQ: a framework for processing base stations in a data center,” in Proc. 18th Int. Conf. on Mobile Computing and Networking, Istanbul, August 2012.
Kelly, F., Notes on Effective Bandwidths. Oxford University Press, 1996, pp. 141–168.
Wuebben, D., Rost, P., Bartelt, J., Lalam, M., Savin, V., Gorgoglione, M., “Benefits and impact of cloud computing on 5G signal processing,” IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 35–44, November 2014.Google Scholar
Shannon, C., “Mathematical theory of communication,” Bell System Tech. J., vol. 27, pp. 379–423 and 623–656, July and October 1948.Google Scholar
3GPP, “Radio access network; evolved universal terrestrial radio access; (e-utra); physical channels and modulation (release 10).” 3GPP, Technical Report, December 2012.
Choi, J. and Bahk, S., “Cell-throughput analysis of the proportional fair scheduler in the single-cell environment,” IEEE Trans. Vehi. Technology, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 766–778, March 2007.Google Scholar
Valenti, M. C., Talarico, S., and Rost, P., “The role of computational outage in dense cloud-based centralized radio access networks,” in Proc. IEEE Global Conf. on Communications, Austin, TX, December 2014.
Grover, P., Woyach, K. A., and Sahai, A., “Towards a communication-theoretic understanding of system-level power consumption,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., September 2011.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. A., Handbook of Mathematical Functions: With Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. Dover Publications, 1965.
Yu, W. and Cioffi, J. M., “On constant power water-filling,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Communications, Helsinki, June 2001.
Rost, P., Maeder, A., Valenti, M., and Talarico, S., “Computationally aware sumrate optimal scheduling for centralized radio access networks,” in Proc. IEEE Global Conf. on Communication, San Diego, CA, November 2015.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×