Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2015
  • Online publication date: April 2015

Section 6 - Minimally invasive surgery

References

1. LenhardtR, MarkerE, GollV, et al. Mild intraoperative hypothermia prolongs post anesthetic recovery. Anesthesiology 1997;87:1318–1323.
2. HassonHM, RotmanC, RanaN, KumariN. Open laparoscopy: 29-year experience. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:763–766.
3. NezhatK, KhoA, MorozovV. Use of neutral argon plasma in the laparoscopic treatment of endometriosis. JSLS 2009;13:479–483.
4. RomanH, PuraI, TartaO, et al. Vaporization of ovarian endometrioma using plasma energy: histologic findings of a pilot study. Fertil Steril 2011;95:1853–1856.
5. SomodaY, OlveraN, ChiDS, et al. Pathologic analysis of ex vivo plasma energy tumor destruction in patients with ovarian or peritoneal cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2010;20:1326–1330.
7. MiladMP, SokolE. Laparoscopic morcellator-related injuries. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003;10:383–385.
8. FergusonJL, BesteTM, NelsonKH, DaucherJA. Making the transition from standard laparoscopy to robotic laparoscopy. JSLS 2004;8:326–328.
9. AdvinculaAP. Robot-assisted laparoscopy: basic principles, equipment, and instrumentation. In TulandiT, AdvinculaA (eds.) Robotic Surgery in Gynecology. Oak Park, IL: Bentham E-Books, 2011.
10. ElliottDS, FrankI, DimarcoDS, ChowGK. Gynecologic use of robotically assisted laparoscopy: sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high-grade vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Surg 2004;188:52S–56S.
11. GoldbergJM, FalconeT. Laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis with and without robotic assistance. Hum Reprod 2003;18:145–147.
12. LehmannKS, RitzJP, MaassH, et al. A prospective randomized study to test the transfer of basic psychomotor skills from virtual reality to physical reality in a comparable training setting. Ann Surg 2005;241:442–449.
13. GrantcharovTP, KristiansenVB, BendixJ, et al. Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg 2004;91:146–150.
14. BozziniP. Der Lichtleiter oder Beschreibung einer einfachen Vorrichtung und ihrer Anwendung zur Erleuchtung innerer Hoehlen und Zwischenraeume des lebenden animalischen Koerpers. Weimar: Landes-Industrie-Comptoir, 1807.
15. SharmaM, TaylorA, di Spiezio SardoA, et al. Outpatient hysteroscopy: traditional versus the “no-touch” technique. BJOG 2005;112:963–967.
16. CampoR, MolinasCR, RombautsL, et al. Prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial to evaluate factors influencing the success rate of office diagnostic hysteroscopy. Hum Reprod 2005;20:258–263.
17. BettocchiS, CeciO, NappiL, et al. Operative office hysteroscopy without anesthesia: analysis of 4863 cases performed with mechanical instruments. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2004;11:59–61.
18. NeuwirthRS. A new technique for and additional experience with hysteroscopic resection of submucous fibroids. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978;131:91–94.
19. HaningRV, Harkins, PG, UehlingDT. Preservation of fertility by transcervical resection of a benign mesodermal uterine tumor with a resectoscope and glycine distending medium. Fertil Steril 1980;33:209–210.
20. DeCherneyAH, PolanML. Hysteroscopic management of uterine lesion and intractable uterine bleeding. Obstet Gynecol 1983;61:392–397.
21. DeCherneyAH, RussellJB, GraebeRA, et al. Resectoscopic management of müllerian fusion defects. Fertil Steril 1986;45:726–728.
22. RubinIC. Uterotubal Insufflation. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 1947.
23. BaggishMS, BrillAl, RosensweigB, et al. Fatal acute glycine and sorbitol toxicity during operative hysteroscopy. J Gynecol Surg 1993;9:137–143.
24. AminHK, NeuwirthRS. Operative hysteroscopy utilizing dextran as a distending medium. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1983;26:277–284.
25. PellicanoM, GuidaM, ZulloF, et al. Carbon dioxide versus normal saline as a uterine distension medium for diagnostic vaginoscopic hysteroscopy in infertile patients: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Fertil Steril 2003;79:418–421.
26. MizutamAR, ParkerJ, KatzJ, SchmidtJ. Visual disturbances, serum glycine levels, and transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol 1990;144:697–699.

References

1. KenyonTA, UrbachDR, SpeerJB, et al. Dedicated minimally invasive surgery suites increase operating room efficiency. Surg Endosc 2001;15:1140–1143.
2. MangumS, CutlerK. Increased efficiency through OR redesign and process simplification. AORN J 2002;76:1041–1046.
3. AORN. Standards, Recommended Practices, and Guidelines with Official AORN Statements. Denver, CO: AORN, 2005.
4. WinerWK, Operating room personnel. In SanfilippoJS, LevineRL (eds.) Operative Gynecologic Endoscopy, 2nd edn. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1996, pp. 412–422.
5. WinerWK. The role of the operating room staff in operative laparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1993;1:86–88.
6. WinerWK, LyonsTL. Suggested set-up and layout of instruments and equipment for advanced operative laparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1995;2:231–234.
7. WinerWK. The set-up for operative endoscopy. Laser Nurs 1991;5:139–145.
8. KadarN. Randomized trials involving laparoscopic surgery: valid research strategy or academic gimmick?J Gynecol Endosc 1994;3:69–73.
9. WarrenJM. Preparation of nonmedical personnel in the operating room environment. Med Instrum 1981;15:156–158.
10. LevineRL. Hysteroscopic instruments. In PasicR, LevineRL (eds.) A Practical Manual of Hysteroscopy and Endometrial Ablation Techniques: A Clinical Cookbook. London, Parthenon, 2004, pp. 13–24.
11. HollowayR. Robotic surgery in gynecology. Scand J Surg 2009;98:96–109.

References

1. HulkaJF, LevyBS, LucianoAA, et al. 1997 AAGL membership survey: practice profiles. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1998;5:93–96.
2. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Criteria Set 25: Diagnostic Laparoscopy. Washington, DC: American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1997.
3. NezhatC. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis. In NezhatC, SieglerA, NezhatF, et al. (eds.) Operative Gynecologic Laparoscopy: Principles and Techniques, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2000, pp. 123–131.
4. DiZeregaGSD, HoltzG. Cause and prevention of postsurgical pelvic adhesions. In OsofskyH (ed.) Advances in Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1982.
5. BrillAl, NezhatF, NezhatCH, et al. The incidence of adhesions after prior laparotomy: a laparoscopic appraisal. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:269–272.
6. CaspiE, HalperinY, BukovskiI. The importance of periadnexal adhesions in tubal reconstruction surgery for infertility. Fertil Steril 1979;31:296–300.
7. NezhatCR, NezhatFR, MetzgerDA, et al. Adhesion formation following reproductive surgery by videolaparoscopy. Fertil Steril 1990;53:1008–1011.
8. LundorffP, HahlinM, KallfeltB, et al. Adhesion formation after laparoscopic surgery in tubal pregnancy: a randomized trial versus laparotomy. Fertil Steril 1991;55:911–915.
9. SchippersE. TittelA, OttongerA, et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy: comparison of adhesion formation after bowel resection in a canine model. Fertil Steril 1998;15:145–147.
10. WallwienerD, MeyerA, BastertG. Adhesion formation of the visceral and parietal peritoneum: an explanation for the controversy on the use of autologous and alloplastic barriers. Fertil Steril 1998;69:132–137.
11. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin 46: Benefits and Risks of Sterilization. Washington, DC: American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2003.
12. PetersonHB, XiaZ, HughesJM, et al. The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:1161–1168.
13. MorlockRJ, LafataJE, EisensteinD. Cost-effectiveness of single-dose methotrexate compared with laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:407–412.
14. NezhatC. Management of ectopic pregnancy. In NezhatC, SieglerA, NezhatF, et al. (eds.) Operative Gynecologic Laparoscopy: Principles and Techniques, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2000, pp. 211–231.
15. MoiF, StrandellA, JurkovicD, et al. The ESEP study: Salpingostomy versus salpingectomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy: The impact on future fertility: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Women’s Health 2008;8:11.
16. Henry-SuchetL, SolerA, LoffredoV. Laparoscopic treatment of tubo-ovarian abscesses. J Reprod Med 1984;8:579.
17. WalkerCK, LandersDV. Pelvic abscesses: new trends in management. Obstet Gynecol Surg 1991;46:615–624.
18. AnducciJE. Laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease with abscess formation. Int Surg 1981;66:359.
19. NezhatC. Operations on the fallopian tube. In NezhatC, SieglerA, NezhatF, et al. (eds.) Operative Gynecologic Laparoscopy: Principles and Techniques, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2000, pp. 233–259.
20. MeckeH, SemmK, FreysI, et al. Pelvic abscesses: pelvicoscopy or laparotomy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1991;31:231.
21. BatemanBG, NunleyWC, KitchinJD. Surgical management of distal tube obstruction: are we making progress?Fertil Steril 1987;48:523.
22. Henry-SuchetJ, LoffredoV, TesquierL, et al. Endoscopy of the tube: its prognostic value for tuboplasties. Acta Eur Fertil 1985;16:139.
23. FalconeT, GoldbergJ, Garcia-RuizA, et al. Full robotic assistance for laparoscopic tubal anastomosis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 1999;9:107.
24. StrandellA, LindhardA, WaldenströmU, et al. Hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome: a prospective, randomized multicentre trial in Scandinavia on salpingectomy prior to IVF. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2762–2276.
25. StrandellA, LindhardA. Hydrosalpinx and ART. Salpingectomy prior to IVF can be recommended to a well-defined subgroup of patients. Hum Reprod 2000;15:2072–2074.
26. PuttemansP, BrosensI, DelattinPet al. Salpingoscopy versus hysterosalpingography in hydrosalpinges. Hum Reprod 1987;2:535–540.
27. SassoneA, Timor-TritschI, ArtnerA, et al. Transvaginal sonographic characterization of ovarian disease: evaluation of a new scoring system to predict ovarian malignancy. Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:70.
28. AlcazarJL, JuradoM. Prospective evaluation of a logistic model based on sonographic morphologic and color Doppler findings developed to predict adnexal malignancy. J Ultrasound Med 1999;18:837.
29. KurtzAB, TsimikasJV, TempanyCMet al. Diagnosis and staging of ovarian cancer: comparative values of Doppler and conventional US, CT, and MR imaging correlated with surgery and histioplathologic analysis-report of the Radiology Diagnositc Oncology Group. Radiology 1999;212:19–27.
30. SohaibSA, MillsTD, SahdevA, et al. The role of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in patients with adnexal masses. Clin Radiol 2005;60:340–348.
31. AdusumilliS, HussainH, CaoiliE, et al. MRI of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:732–740.
32. SpencerJA, GhattamaneniS, MR imaging of the sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass. Radiology 2010;256:677–694.
33. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion 280: the role of the generalist obstetrician-gynecologist in the early detection of ovarian cancer. Washington, DC: American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2002.
34. DearkingAC, AlettiGD, McGeeME, et al. How relevant are ACOG and SGO guidelines for referral of adnexal mass?Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:841–848.
35. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion No. 477: the role of the obstetrician–gynecologist in the early detection of epithelial ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:742–746.
36. HulkaJ, ParkerW, SurreyM, et al. American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists survey of management of ovarian masses in 1990. J Reprod Med 1992;7:599.
37. NezhatF, NezhatC, WelanderCE, BenignoB. Four ovarian cancers diagnosed during laparoscopic management of 1011 women with adnexal masses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167:790–796.
38. SjovallK, NilssonB, EinhornN. Different types of rupture of the tumor capsule and the impact on survival in early ovarian carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 1994;4:333.
39. DemboAJ, DavyM, StenwigAE, et al. Prognostic factors in patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:263.
40. Sainz del la CuestaR, GoffBA, FullerAF Jr., et al. Prognostic importance of intraoperative rupture of malignant ovarian epithelial neoplasms. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:1.
41. VergoteI, De BrabanterJ, FylesA, et al. Prognostic importance of degree of differentiation and cyst rupture in stage I invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Lancet 2001;357:176–182.
42. GadM, El KhoulyN, SotoE, et al. Differences in perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic management of benign and malignant adnexal masses. J Gynecol Oncol 2010;22:18–24.
43. MillerCE. Myomectomy: comparison of open and laparoscopic techniques. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2000;27:407–420.
44. SeidmanDS, NezhatCH, NezhatF, et al. The role of laparoscopic-assisted myomectomy (LAM). J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 2001;5:299–303.
45. KohC, JanikG. Laparoscopic myomectomy: the current status. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2003;15:295–301.
46. DubuissonJB, ChavetX, ChapronC, et al. Uterine rupture during pregnancy after laparoscopic myomectomy. Hum Reprod 1995;10:1475–1477.
47. NezhatCH, NezhatF, RoemischM, et al. Pregnancy following laparoscopic myomectomy: preliminary results. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1219–1221.
48. NezhatFR, RoemischM, NezhatCH, et al. Recurrence rate after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1998;5:237–240.
49. SeracchioliR, RossiS, GovoniF, et al. Fertility and obstetric outcome after laparoscopic myomectomy of large myomata: a randomized comparison with abdominal myomectomy. Hum Reprod 2000;15:2663–2668.
50. MaisV, AjossaS, GuerrieroS, et al. Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: a prospective randomized trial to evaluate benefits in early outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:654–658.
51. SilvaBA, FalconeT, BradleyL, et al. Case–control study of laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 2000;10:191–197.
52. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Criteria Set: laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1996;53:91–92.
53. NezhatF, NezhatC, GordonS, et al. Laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy. J Reprod Med 1992;37:247–250.
54. SummittRL, Jr., StovallTG, SteegeJF, LipscombGH. A multicenter randomized comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in abdominal hysterectomy candidates. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:321–326.
55. FalconeT, ParaisoMF, MaschaE. Prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:955–962.
56. SummittRL, StovallTG, LipscombGH, et al. Randomized comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy with standard vaginal hysterectomy in an outpatient setting. Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:895–901.
57. KovacSR. Hysterectomy outcomes in patients with similar indications. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:787–793.
58. CristoforoniPM, PalmieriA, GerbaldoD, et al. Frequency and cause of aborted laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1995;3:33–37.
59. ShinJ, LeeH, LeeS, ParkC. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy and laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. JSLS 2011;15:218–221.
60. GarryR, FountainJ, MasonS, et al. The Evaluate Study: two parallel trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, and the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ 2004;328:129.
61. CandianiM, IzzoS, BulfoniA, et al. Laparoscopic vs. vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:368.
62. MakinenJ, JohanssonJ, TomasC, et al. Morbidity of 10 110 hysterectomies by type of approach. Hum Reprod 2001;16:1473–1478.
63. WattiezA, SorianoD, CohenSB, et al. The learning curve of total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2002;9:339–345.
64. TwijnstarA, StiggelboutA, KroonC, JansonF. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: eliciting preference of performers and colleagues via conjoint analysis. J Min Invas Gynecol 2011;18:582–588.
65. NezhatC, BessO, AdmonD, NezhatC, NezhatF. Hospital cost comparison between abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomies. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:713–715.
66. HilarisGE, TsoubisT, KonstantopoulosV, PavlakisK. Feasibility, safety, and cost outcomes of laparoscopic management of early endometrial and cervical malignancy. JSLS 2009;13:489–495.
67. SculpherM, MancaA, AbbottJ, et al. Cost effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with standard hysterectomy: results from a randomized trial. BMJ 2004;328:134.
68. BellMC, TorgersonJ, Seshadri-KreadenU, SuttleAW, HuntS. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Gynecol Oncol 2008;111:407–411.
69. BijenCBM, VermeulenKM, MouritsMJE, de BockGH. Costs and effects of abdominal versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: systemic review of controlled trials. PLoS ONE 2009;4:e7340.
70. WarrenL, LadapoJA, BorahBJ, GunnarssonC. Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care. J Min Invas Gynecol 2009;16:581–588.
71. MiladMP, MorrisonK, SokolA, et al. A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Surg Endosc 2001;15:286–288.
72. OkaroEO, JonesKD, SuttonC. Long term outcome following laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2001;108:1017–1020.
73. NezhatC, NezhatF, RoemischM, SeidmanD, NezhatC. Laparoscopic trachelectomy for persistent pelvic pain and endometriosis after supracervical hysterectomy. Fertil Steril 1996;66:925–928.
74. EinarssonJ, SuzukiY, VelilngaT, et al. Prospective evaluation of quality of life in total versus supracervical laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Min Invas Gynecol 2011;18:617–621.
75. Abu-RustumNR. Laparoscopy 2003: oncologic perspective. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2003;46:61–69.
76. NezhatCR, BurrellMO, NezhatFR, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with para-aortic and pelvic node dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:864–865.
77. NezhatCR, NezhatFR, RamirezCE, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy with pelvic and paraaortic node dissection. J Gynecol Surg 1993;9:105.
78. TaylorS, McBeeW, RichardS, EdwardsR. Radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: laparoscopy versus laparotomy. JSLS 2011;15:213–217.
79. SalicruS, Gil-MorenoA, MonteroA, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadectomy in early invasive cervical cancer. J Min Invas Gynecol 2011;18:555–568.
80. SolimanP, FrumovitzM, SunC, et al. Radical hysterectomy: a comparison of surgical approaches after adoption of robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol 2011;123:333–336.
81. SpirtosN, EisenkopSM, SchlaerthJ, BallonS. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I cervical cancer: surgical morbidity and intermediate follow-up. Am J Obstet Gyencol 2002;187:340–348.
82. ObermairA, GebskiV, FrumovitxM, et al. A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with earaly stage cervical cancer. J Min Invas Gynecol 2008;15:584–588.
83. DargentD, SalvatJ. L’envahissement ganglionnaire pelvien: place de la pelviscopie retroperitoneale. Paris: McGraw-Hill, 1989.
84. WalkerJ, PiedmonteM, SpirtosN, et al. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:5331–5336.
85. PanX, LinH, WantY, et al. Feasibility of laparoscopic extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic malignancies. Gynecol Oncol 2011;122:281–284.
86. FanningJ, HosslerC. Laparoscopic conversion rate for uterine cancer surgical staging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:1354–1357.
87. MagrinaJ, MarianiA, MagtibayP. Laparoscopy for endometrial cancer. In NezhatC, SieglerA, NezhatF, et al. (eds.) Operative Gynecologic Laparoscopy: Principles and Techniques, 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008, pp. 465–474.
88. KornblithA, HuangH, WalkerJ, et al. Quality of life of patients with endometrial cancer undergoing laparoscopic International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging compared with laparotomy: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 2009;27; 5337–5342.
89. KavoussiLR, SosaE, ChandhokeP, et al. Complications of laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection. J Urol 1993;149:322–325.
90. ChildersJM, HatchKD, SurwitEA. Laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic malignancies. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:741–747.
91. KruitwagenRF, SwinkelsBM, KeyserKG, et al. Incidence and effect on survival of abdominal wall metastases at trocar puncture sites following laparoscopy or paracentesis in women with ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1996;60:233–237.
92. OzmenB, SukurY, AtabekogluC, et al. Early port-site metastasis during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced stage ovarian cancer: report of two cases. J Gynecol Oncol 2011;22:57–60.
93. NagarshethN, RahamanJ, CohenC, GretzH, NezhatF. The incidence of port-site metasteses in gynecologic cancers. JSLS 2004;8:133–139.
94. PassoverM, KrauseN, PaulK, et al. Laparoscopic para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy: experience with 150 patients and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 1998;71:19–28.
95. GhezziF, UccellaS, CromiA, et al. Lymphoceles, lymphorrhea and lymphedema after laparoscopic and open endometrial cancer staging. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19:259–267.
96. XuH, WangD, WangY, et al. Endoscopic inguinal lymphadectomy with a novel abdominal approach to vulvar cancer: description of technique and surgical outcome. J Min Invas Gynecol 2009;18:644–650.
97. BullerJL, CundiffGW. Laparoscopic surgeries for urinary incontinence. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000;43:604–618.
98. BurtonG. A three-year prospective randomized urodynamic study comparing open and laparoscopic colposuspension. Neurourol Urodyn 1997;16:353–354.
99. SuT, WantK, HsuC, et al. Prospective comparison of laparoscopic and traditional colposuspensions in the treatment of genuine stress incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997;76:576–582.
100. SummittRL, LucenteV, KarramMM, et al. Randomized comparison of laparoscopic and transabdominal Burch urethropexy for treatment of genuine stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95(Suppl):2S.
101. NezhatCH, NezhatF, NezhatC. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:885.
102. RossJW. Apical vault repair, the cornerstone of pelvic floor reconstruction. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1997;4:173.
103. ShawkiH. The efficacy of laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation (LUNA) in the treatment of unexplained chronic pelvic pain: a randomized controlled trial. Gynecol Surg 2011;8:31–39.
104. PolanML, DeCherneyA. Presacral neurectomy for pelvic pain in infertility. Fertil Steril 1980;34:557–560.
105. PerezJJ. Laparoscopic presacral neurectomy: results of the first 25 cases. J Reprod Med 1990;35:625–630.
106. NezhatCH, SeidmanDS, NezhatFR, et al. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic presacral neurectomy for the treatment of central pelvic pain attributed to endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:701–704.
107. BiggerstaffED 3rd, FosterSN. Laparoscopic presacral neurectomy for treatment of midline pelvic pain. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1994;2:31–35.
108. DaniellJF, KurtzBR, GurleyLD, et al. Laparoscopic presacral neurectomy vs. neurotomy: use of the argon beam coagulator compared to conventional technique. J Gynecol Surg 1993;9:169–173.
109. ChenFP, SoongYK. The efficacy and complications of laparoscopic presacral neurectomy in pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:974–977.
110. ChenFP, ChangSD, ChuKK, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic presacral neurectomy and laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation for primary dysmenorrhea. J Reprod Med 1996;41:463–466.
111. LichtenEM, BonbardJ. Surgical treatment of primary dysmenorrhea with laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation. J Reprod Med 1987;32:37–41.
112. PelosiMA, PelosiMA 3rd. Laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oopherectomy using a single umbilical puncture. N Engl J Med 1991;88:721–726.
113. YimG, JungY, PaekJ, et al. Transumbilical single-port access versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gyencol 2010;203:26.
114. KimW, ImK, KwonY. Single-port transubilical laparoscopic-assisted adnexal surgery. JSLS 2011;5:222–247.
115. EscobarP, FrumovitzM, SolimanP, et al. Comparison of single-port laparoscopy, standard laparsocopy, and robotic surgery in patients with endometrial cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19:1583–1588.
116. EscobarPF, StarksDC, FaderAN, BarberM, Rojas-EspalliatL. Single-port risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy with and without hysterectomy: surgical outcomes and learning curve analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2010;119:43–47.
117. PaekJ, KimS, LeeS, et al. Learning curve and surgical outcome for single-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy in 100 consecutive cases. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2011;72:227–233.
118. MarchalF, RauchP, VandrommeJ, et al. Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopichysterectomy for benign and oncologic pathologies: initial clinical experience with 30 patients. Surg Endosc 2005;19:826–831.
119. SertBM, AbelerVM. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with pelvic node dissection: case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2006;27:531–533.
120. SertB, AbelerV. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now?Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 2007;3:224–228.
121. SedlacekTV, CampionMJ, ReichH, SedlacekT. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a feasibility study. Gynecol Oncol 1995;56:126.
122. LinYS. Preliminary results of laparoscopic modified radical hysterectomy in early invasive cervical cancer. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003;10:80–84.
123. Abu-RustumNR, GemignaniML, MooreK, et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy using the argon-beam coagulator: pilot data and comparison to laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 2003;91:402–409.
124. ZakashanskyK, ChuangL, GretzH, et al. A case-controlled study of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in a fellowship training program. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2007;17:1075–1082.
125. LiG, YanX, ShangH, et al. A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvis lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2007;105:176–180.
126. FrumovitzM, dos ReisR, SunCC, et al. Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:96–102.
127. FrumovitzM, RamirezPT. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: surgical technique and instrumentation. Gynecol Oncol 2007;104(Suppl):13–16.
128. GhezziF, CromiA, CiravoloG, et al. Surgicopathologic outcome of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2007;106:502–506.
129. Díaz-FeijoóB, A Gil-MorenoA, Pérez-BenaventeA, et al. Sentinel lymph node identification and radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer: laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J Min Invas Gynecol 2008;15:531–537.
130. MalzoniM, TinelliR, CosentinoF, FuscoA, MalzoniC. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience. Ann Surg Oncol 2009;16:1316–1323.
131. SobiczewskiP, BidzinskiM, DerlatkaP, et al. Early cervical cancer managed by laparoscopy and conventional surgery: comparison of treatment results. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009;19:1390–1395.
132. MalurS, PossoverM, SchneiderA. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal versus radical abdominal hysterectomy type II in patients with cervical cancer. Surg Endosc 2001;15:289–292.
133. NamJH, KimJH, KimDY, et al. Comparative study of laparoscopico-vaginal radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004;92:277–283.
134. SteedH, RosenB, MurphyJ, et al. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2004;93:588–593.
135. JacksonKS, DasN, NaikR, et al. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy vs. radical abdominal hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a match controlled study. Gynecol Oncol 2004;95:655–661.
136. SharmaR, BaileyJ, AndersonR, MurdochJ. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (Coelio–Schauta): a comparison with open Wertheim/Meigs hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006;16:1927–1932.
137. Morgan, DJ, HunterDC, McCrackenG, et al. Is laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma safe? A case control study with follow up. BJOG 2007;114:537–542.
138. DornhöferN, HöckelM. New Developments in the surgical therapy of cervical carcinoma. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008;1138:233–252.
139. BoggessJ, GehrigP, CantrellL, et al. A case control study of robotic assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;19:357–359.
140. LambaudieE, HouvenaeghelG, WalzJ, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology. Surg Endosc 2008;22:2743–2747.
141. KoEM, MutoMG, BerkowitzRS, FelmateCM. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. Gynecol Oncol 2008;111:425–430.
142. MagrinaJF, KhoRM, WeaverAL, MonteroRP, MagtibayPM. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and lapaprotomy. Gynecol Oncol 2008;109:86–91.
143. NezhatFR, DattaMS, LiuC, ChuangL, ZakashanksyK. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer. JSLS 2008;12:227–237.
144. ChoJE, NezhatFR. Robotics and gynecologic oncology: review of the literature. J Min Invas Gynecol 2009;16:669–681.
145. KruijdenbergCB, van den EindenLC, HendriksJC, et al. Robot-assisted versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer, a review. Gynecol Oncol 2011;120:334–339.
146. RenatoS, MohamedM, SerenaS, et al. Robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: review of surgical and oncological outcomes. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2011;2011:872434.
147. EstapeR, LambrouN, DiazR, et al. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 2009;113:357–361.
148. SertMB, ErakerR. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynecological oncology; initial experience at Oslo Radium Hospital and 16 months follow-up. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 2009;5:410–414.
149. CantrellLA, MendivilA, GehrigPA, BoggessJF. Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 3-year experience. Gynecol Oncol 2010;117:260–265.
150. KimYT, KimSW, HyungWJ, et al. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 2008;108:312–316.
151. FanningJ, FentonB, PurghitM. Robotic radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:649.
152. PerssonJ, ReynissonP, BorgfeldtC, et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with short and long term morbidity data. Gynecol Oncol 2009;113:185–190.
153. LoweMP, ChamberlainDH, KamelleSA, et al. Multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2009;113:191–194.
154. MaggioniA, MinigL, ZanagnoloV, et al. Robotic approach for cervical cancer: comparison with laparotomy – a case control study. Gynecol Oncol 2009;115:60–64.
155. PerssonJ, KannistoP, BossmarT. Robot-assisted abdominal laparoscopic radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2008:111:564–567.
156. ChuangLT, LernerDL, LiuCS, NezhatFR. Fertility-sparing robotic-assisted radical trachelectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer. J Min Invasive Gynecol 2008;15:767–770.
157. GeislerJP, OrrCJ, ManahanKJ. Robotically assisted total laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for fertility sparing in stage IB1 adenosarcoma of the cervix. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 2008;18:727–729.
158. MolpusKL, WedergrenJS, CarlsonMA. Robotically assisted endoscopic ovarian transposition. JSLS 2003;7:59–62.
159. YimG, KimY. Robotic surgery in gynecologic cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2012;24:14–23.
160. RamirezP, AdamsS, BoeggessJ, et al. Robotic assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology: a Society of Gynecologic Oncology consensus statement. Developed by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology’s Clinical Practice Robotics Task Force. Gynecol Oncol 2112;124:180–184.
161. FastrezM, VandrommeJ, GeorgeP, et al. Robot assisted laparoscopic transperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the management of advanced cervical carcinoma. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009;147:226–229.
162. VergoteI, PouseeleB, Van GorpT, et al. Robotic retroperitoneal lower paraaortic lymphadenectomy in cervical carcinoma: first report on the technique used in 5 patients. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008;87:783–787.
163. LimPC. Robotic assisted total pelvic exenteration: a case report. Gynecol Oncol 2009;115:310–311.
164. LambaudieE, NarducciF, LeblancE, et al. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic anterior pelvic exenteration for recurrent cervical cancer: report of three first cases. Gynecol Oncol 2010;116:582–583.
165. DavisMA, AdamsS, EunD, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic exenteration in recurrent cervical cancer. Robotics improved the surgical experience for 2 women with recurrent cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:663.
166. LambaudieE, NarducciF, BannierM, et al. Role of robot-assisted laparoscopy in adjuvant surgery for locally advanced cervical cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2010;36:409–413.
167. DegueldreM, VandrommeJ, HuongPT, CadièreGB. Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a feasibility study. Fertil Steril 2000;74:1020–1023.
168. NezhatFR, Chang-JacksonSC, AcholonuUC Jr., VeterePF. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic transection and repair of an obturator nerve during pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2012;119:462–464.
169. EspadaM, MunozR, NobleB, MagrinaJ. Insulation failure in robotic and laparoscopic instrumentation: a prospective evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:121.
170. MuesA, BoxG, AbazaR. Robotic instrument insulation failure: initial report of a potential source of patient injury. Urology 2011;77:104–107.
171. CormierB, NezhatF, SternchosJ, et al. Electrocautery-associated vascular injury during robotic-assisted surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120:491–493.
172. BushA, MorrisS, MillhamF, IsaacsonK. Women’s preferences for minimally invasive incisions. J Min Invas Gynecol 2011;18:640–643.
173. LenihanJP, KovandaC, Seshadri-KeadenU. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?J Min Invas Gynecol 2008;15:589–594.
174. SfakianosGP, FrederickPJ, KendrickJE, et al. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology fellowship programs in the USA: a survey of fellows and fellowship directors. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 2010;6:405–412.
175. TinelliR, MalvasiA, GustapaneS, et al. Robotic assisted surgery in gynecology: current insights and future perspectives. Rec Pat Biotechnol 2011;5:12–24.
176. MarescauxJ, LeroyJ, GagnerM, et al. Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 2001;413-379–380.
177. NezhatC, NezhatF, NezhatC. Operative laparoscopy (minimally invasive surgery): state of the art. J Gynecol Surg 1992;8:3.

References

1. BettocchiS, NappiL, CeciO, SelvaggiL. Office hysteroscopy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2004;31:641–654.
2. PreutthipanS, HerabutyaY. Hysteroscopic polypectomy in 240 premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Fertil Steril 2005;83:705–709.
3. American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. AAGL practice report: practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of endometrial polyps. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2012;19:3–10.
4. GebauerG, HafnerA, SiebzehnrublE, LangN. Role of hysteroscopy in detection and extraction of endometrial polyps: results of a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:59–63.
5. TjarksM, Van VoorhisBJ. Treatment of endometrial polyps. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:886–889.
6. ChalasE, CostantinoJP, WickerhamDL, et al. Benign gynecologic conditions among participants in the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:1230–1237; discussion 1237–1239.
7. WamstekerK, EmanuelMH, de KruifJH. Transcervical hysteroscopic resection of submucous fibroids for abnormal uterine bleeding: results regarding the degree of intramural extension. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:736–740.
8. LeoneFP, LanzaniC, FerrazziE. Use of strict sonohysterographic methods for preoperative assessment of submucous myomas. Fertil Steril 2003;79:998–1002.
9. LofferFD. Removal of large symptomatic intrauterine growths by the hysteroscopic resectoscope. Obstet Gynecol 1990;76:836–840.
10. BergA, SandvikL, LangebrekkeA, IstreO. A randomized trial comparing monopolar electrodes using glycine 1.5% with two different types of bipolar electrodes (TCRis, Versapoint) using saline, in hysteroscopic surgery. Fertil Steril 2009;91:1273–1278.
11. EmanuelMH, WamstekerK. The Intra Uterine Morcellator: a new hysteroscopic operating technique to remove intrauterine polyps and myomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005;12:62–66.
12. SimonsM, HamerlynckTW, AbdulkadirL, SchootBC. Hysteroscopic morcellator system can be used for removal of a uterine septum. Fertil Steril 2011;96:e118–121.
13. van DongenH, EmanuelMH, WolterbeekR, TrimbosJB, JansenFW. Hysteroscopic morcellator for removal of intrauterine polyps and myomas: a randomized controlled pilot study among residents in training. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008;15:466–471.
14. HamerlynckTW, DietzV, SchootBC. Clinical implementation of the hysteroscopic morcellator for removal of intrauterine myomas and polyps. A retrospective descriptive study. Gynecol Surg 2011;8:193–196.
15. VercelliniP, ZainaB, YaylayanL, et al. Hysteroscopic myomectomy: long-term effects on menstrual pattern and fertility. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:341–347.
16. EmanuelMH, WamstekerK, HartAA, MetzG, LammesFB. Long-term results of hysteroscopic myomectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding. Obstet Gynecol 1999;93:743–748.
17. ChangAS, SiegelCL, MoleyKH, RattsVS, OdemRR. Septate uterus with cervical duplication and longitudinal vaginal septum: a report of five new cases. Fertil Steril 2004;81:1133–1136.
18. FaivreE, FernandezH, DeffieuxX, et al. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of septate and bicornuate uterus compared with office hysteroscopy and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2012;19:101–106.
19. DabirashrafiH, MohammadK, Moghadami-TabriziN, ZandinejadK, Moghadami-TabriziM. Is estrogen necessary after hysteroscopic incision of the uterine septum?J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1996;3:623–625.
20. NawrothF, SchmidtT, FreiseC, FothD, RomerT. Is it possible to recommend an “optimal” postoperative management after hysteroscopic metroplasty? A retrospective study with 52 infertile patients showing a septate uterus. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002;81:55–57.
21. MolloA, De FranciscisP, ColacurciN, et al. Hysteroscopic resection of the septum improves the pregnancy rate of women with unexplained infertility: a prospective controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2009;91:2628–2631.
22. ValleRF. Hysteroscopic treatment of partial and complete uterine septum. Int J Fertil Menopaus Stud 1996;41:310–315.
23. HomerHA, LiTC, CookeID. The septate uterus: a review of management and reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril 2000;73:1–14.
24. ValliE, VaqueroE, LazzarinN, et al. Hysteroscopic metroplasty improves gestational outcome in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2004;11:240–244.
25. VenturoliS, ColomboFM, VianelloF, et al. A study of hysteroscopic metroplasty in 141 women with a septate uterus. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2002;266:157–159.
26. LavergneN, AristizabalJ, ZarkaV, ErnyR, HedonB. Uterine anomalies and in vitro fertilization: what are the results?Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996;68:29–34.
27. ValleRF, SciarraJJ. Intrauterine adhesions: hysteroscopic diagnosis, classification, treatment, and reproductive outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;158:1459–1470.
28. WestendorpIC, AnkumWM, MolBW, VonkJ. Prevalence of Asherman’s syndrome after secondary removal of placental remnants or a repeat curettage for incomplete abortion. Hum Reprod 1998;13:3347–3350.
29. ZikopoulosKA, KolibianakisEM, PlatteauP, et al. Live delivery rates in subfertile women with Asherman’s syndrome after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis using the resectoscope or the Versapoint system. Reprod Biomed Online 2004;8:720–725.
30. MyersEM, HurstBS. Comprehensive management of severe Asherman syndrome and amenorrhea. Fertil Steril 2012;97:160–164.
31. RobinsonJK, ColimonLM, IsaacsonKB. Postoperative adhesiolysis therapy for intrauterine adhesions (Asherman’s syndrome). Fertil Steril 2008;90:409–414.
32. KatzZ, Ben-ArieA, LurieS, ManorM, InslerV. Reproductive outcome following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in Asherman’s syndrome. Int J Fertil Menopaus Stud 1996;41:462–465.
33. FernandezH, Al-NajjarF, Chauveaud-LamblingA, FrydmanR, GervaiseA. Fertility after treatment of Asherman’s syndrome stage 3 and 4. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2006;13:398–402.
34. Capella-AlloucS, MorsadF, Rongieres-BertrandC, TaylorS, FernandezH. Hysteroscopic treatment of severe Asherman’s syndrome and subsequent fertility. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1230–1233.
35. Conceptus. Essure: the Alternative to Incision. HSG Protocol. Mountain View, CA: Conceptus, 2003.
36. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Gynecologic Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 458: hysterosalpingography after tubal sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:1343–1345.
37. KerinJF, LevyBS. Ultrasound: an effective method for localization of the echogenic Essure sterilization micro-insert: correlation with radiologic evaluations. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005;12:50–54.
38. CooperJM, CarignanCS, CherD, KerinJF, Selective Tubal Occlusion Procedure 2000 Investigators Group. Microinsert nonincisional hysteroscopic sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:59–67.
39. KerinJF, CooperJM, PriceT, et al. Hysteroscopic sterilization using a micro-insert device: results of a multicentre Phase II study. Hum Reprod 2003;18:1223–1230.
40. Conceptus. Essure System Instructions for Use. Mountain View, CA: Conceptus, 2009.
41. HopkinsMR, CreedonDJ, El-NasharSA, et al. Radiofrequency global endometrial ablation followed by hysteroscopic sterilization. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007;14:494–501.
42. Conceptus. Important Information for Physicians on Modifications to the Essure Permanent Birth Control System Labeling Related to Concomitant Use with Gynecare Thermachoice Uterine Balloon Therapy System. Mountain View, CA: Conceptus, 2006.
43. SulakPJ, LetterieGS, CoddingtonCC, et al. Histology of proximal tubal occlusion. Fertil Steril 1987;48:437–440.
44. NovyMJ, ThurmondAS, PattonP, UchidaBT, RoschJ. Diagnosis of cornual obstruction by transcervical fallopian tube cannulation. Fertil Steril 1988;50:434–440.
45. Al-JaroudiD, HerbaMJ, TulandiT. Reproductive performance after selective tubal catheterization. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005;12:150–152.
46. ThurmondAS, MachanLS, MaubonAJ, et al. A review of selective salpingography and fallopian tube catheterization. Radiographics. 2000;20:1759–1768.
47. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Committee opinion: role of tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril 2012;97:539–545.
48. DeCherneyA, PolanML. Hysteroscopic management of intrauterine lesions and intractable uterine bleeding. Obstet Gynecol 1983;61:392–397.
49. DebS, FloraK, AtiomoW. A survey of preferences and practices of endometrial ablation/resection for menorrhagia in the United Kingdom. Fertil Steril 2008;90:1812–1817.
50. LethabyA, HickeyM, GarryR, PenninxJ. Endometrial resection/ablation techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(4):CD001501.
51. RauramoI, EloI, IstreO. Long-term treatment of menorrhagia with levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus endometrial resection. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:1314–1321.
52. KaunitzAM, MeredithS, InkiP, KubbaA, Sanchez-RamosL. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and endometrial ablation in heavy menstrual bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2009;113:1104–1116.
53. ZupiE, ZulloF, MarconiD, et al. Hysteroscopic endometrial resection versus laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy for menorrhagia: a prospective randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:7–12.
54. DuttonC, AckersonL, Phelps-SandallB. Outcomes after rollerball endometrial ablation for menorrhagia. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:35–39.
55. TeirneyR, ArachchiGJ, FraserIS. Menstrual blood loss measured 5–6 years after endometrial ablation. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:251–254.
56. ClarkTJ, VoitD, GuptaJK, et al. Accuracy of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and hyperplasia: a systematic quantitative review. JAMA 2002;288:1610–1621.
57. FerrazziE, ZupiE, LeoneFP, et al. How often are endometrial polyps malignant in asymptomatic postmenopausal women? A multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:235.e1–235.e6.
58. LittaP, MerlinF, SaccardiC, et al. Role of hysteroscopy with endometrial biopsy to rule out endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding. Maturitas 2005;50:117–123.
59. ElfayomyAK, HabibFA, AlkabalawyMA. Role of hysteroscopy in the detection of endometrial pathologies in women presenting with postmenopausal bleeding and thickened endometrium. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012;285:839–843.
60. BradleyWH, BoenteMP, BrookerD, et al. Hysteroscopy and cytology in endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:1030–1033.
61. Sainz de la CuestaR, EspinosaJA, CrespoE, GranizoJJ, RivasF. Does fluid hysteroscopy increase the stage or worsen the prognosis in patients with endometrial cancer? A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004;115:211–215.
62. BiewengaP, de BlokS, BirnieE. Does diagnostic hysteroscopy in patients with stage I endometrial carcinoma cause positive peritoneal washings?Gynecol Oncol 2004;93:194–198.
63. KudelaM, PilkaR. Is there a real risk in patients with endometrial carcinoma undergoing diagnostic hysteroscopy (HSC)?Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2001;22:342–344.

References

1. ChapronC, QuerleuD, BruhatMA, et al. Surgical complications of diagnostic and operative gynaecological laparoscopy: a series of 29 966 cases. Hum Reprod 1998;13:867–872.
2. JansenFW, KapiteynK, Trimbos-KemperT, et al. Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multicentre observational study. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1997;104:595–600.
3. Harkki-SirenP, SjobergJ, KurkiT. Major complications of laparoscopy: a follow-up Finnish study. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:94–98.
4. MirhashemiR, HarlowBL, GinsburgES, et al. Predicting risk of complications with gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:327–331.
5. LeonardF, LecuruF, ChassetS., et al. Perioperative morbidity of gynecological laparoscopy. A prospective monocenter observational study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000;79:129–134.
6. LevrantSG, BieberEJ, BarnesRB. Anterior abdominal wall adhesions after laparotomy or laparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1997;4:353–356.
7. NguSF, CheungVY, PunTC. Left upper quadrant approach in laparoscopic surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011;90:1406–1409.
8. ByronJW, MarkensonG, MiyazawaK. A randomized comparison of Veress needle and direct trocar insertion for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993;177:259–262.
9. HassonH, RotmanC, RanaN, KumariNA. Open laparoscopy: 29-year experience. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:763–766.
10. JansenFW, KolkmanW, BakkumEA, et al. Complications of laparoscopy: an inquiry about closed- versus open-entry technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:634–638.
11. ChapronC, CravelloL, ChopinN, et al. Complications during set-up procedures for laparoscopy in gynecology: open laparoscopy does not reduce the risk of major complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003;82:1125–1129.
12. SaberAA, MeslemaniAM, PimentaelR. Safety zones for anterior abdominal wall entry during laparoscopy: a CT scan mapping of epigastric vessels. Ann Surg 2004;239:182–185.
13. HurdWW, AmesseLS, GruberJS, et al. Visualization of the epigastric vessels and bladder before laparoscopic trocar placement. Fertil Steril 2003;80:209–212.
14. OstrzenskiA, OstrzenskaKM. Bladder injury during laparoscopic surgery. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1998;53:175–180.
15. HorngSG, HuangKS, LoTS, SoongYK. Bladder injury after LAVH: a prospective randomized comparison of vaginal and laparoscopic approaches to colpotomy during LAVH. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2004;11:42–46.
16. GodfreyC, WahleGR, SchilderJM, et al. Occult bladder injury during laparoscopy: report of 2 cases. J Lapro Adv Surg Tech 1999;9:341–345.
17. NezhatCH, NezhatF, BrillAl, NezhatC. Normal variations of abdominal and pelvic anatomy evaluated at laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:238–242.
18. TamussinoKF, LangPFJ, BreinlE. Ureteral complications with operative gynecologic laparoscopy. J Urol 1998;160:2313–2314.
19. JohnsonN, BarlowD, LethabyA, et al. Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMJ 2005;330:1478.
20. OstrzenskiA, RadolinskiB, OstrzenskaKM. A review of laparoscopic ureteral injury in pelvic surgery. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2003;58:794–799.
21. van der VoortM, HeijnsdijkEA, GoumaDJ. Bowel injury as a complication of laparoscopy. Br J Surg 2004;91:1253–1258.
22. ShenCC, WuMP, LuCH, et al. Small intestinal injury in laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003;10:350–355.
23. BrosensI, GordonA, CampoR, GordtsS. Bowel injury in gynecologic laparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2003;10:9–13.
24. VilosG. Laparoscopic bowel injuries: 40 litigated gynaecologic cases in Canada. J Obstet Gynecol Can 2002;24:224–230.
25. ChampaultG, CazacuF, TaffinaderN. Serious trocar accidents in laparoscopic surgery: a French survey of 103 852 operations. Surg Lap Endoscop 1996;6:367–370.
26. BaggishMS. Analysis of 31 cases of major vessel injury associated with gynecologic laparoscopy operations. J Gynecol Surg 2003;19:63–73.
27. HurdWW, BudeRO, DelanceyJOL, et al. Abdominal wall characterization by MRI and CT imaging: the effect of obesity on laparoscopic approach. J Reprod Med 1991;36:473.
28. NarendranM, BaggishMS. Mean distance between primary trocar insertion site and major retroperitoneal vessels during routine laparoscopy. J Gynecol Surg 2002;18:121–127.
29. HurHC, DonnellanN, MansuriaS, et al. Vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:794–801.
30. YaakovianMD, HamadGG, GuidoRS. Laparoscopic management of vaginal evisceration: a case report and review of the literature. J Min Gynecol 2008;15:119–121.
31. Kho Rm, AklMN, CornellaJL, et al. Incidence and characteristics of patients with vaginal cuff dehiscence after robotic procedures. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:231–235.
32. JansenFW, VredevoogdCB, UlzenKV, et al. Complications of hysteroscopy: a prospective multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:266–270.
33. CampoR, MolinasCR, RombautsL, et al. Prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial to evaluate factors influencing the success rate of office diagnostic hysteroscopy. Hum Reprod 2005;20:258–263.
34. PreutthipanS, HerabutyY. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before operative hysteroscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:890–894.
35. ThomasJA, LeylandN, DurandN, WindrimRD. The use of oral misoprostol as a cervical riping agent in operative hysteroscopy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:876–879.
36. SelkA, KroftJ. Misoprostol in operative hysteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:941–949.
37. PellicanoM, GuidaM, ZulloF, et al. Carbon dioxide versus normal saline as a uterine distension medium for diagnostic vaginoscopic hysteroscopy in infertile patients: a prospective, randomized, multi-center study. Fertil Steril 2003;79:418–421.
38. WitzCA, SilverbergKM, BurnsWN, et al. Complications associated with the absorption of hysteroscopic fluid media. Fertil Steril 1993;60:745–756.
39. EllingsonTL, AboulafiaDM. Dextran syndrome. Acute hypotension, noncardiogenic pulmonary edema, anemia, and coagulopathy following hysteroscopic surgery using 32% dextran 70. Chest 1997;111:513–518.
40. AgostiniA, CravelloL, DesbriereR, et al. Hemorrhage risk during operative hysteroscopy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002;81:878–881.
41. AgostiniA, CravelloL, ShojaiR, et al. Postoperative infection and surgical hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril 2002;77;766–768.
42. KasiusJC, BroekmansFJ, FauserBC, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for hysteroscopy evaluation of the uterine cavity. Fertil Steril 2011;95:792–794.
43. BehniaR, HolleyHS, MiladM. Successful early intervention in air embolism during hysteroscopy. J Clin Anesth 1997;9:248–250.
44. GoldrathMH. Use of danazol in hysteroscopy surgery for menorrhagia. J Reprod Med 1990;35:91–92.
45. TownsendDE, McCauslandV, McCauslandA, et al. Postablation tubal sterilization syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:422–423.
46. AngellNF, TanDJ, SiddiqiN. Uterine rupture at term after uncomplicated hysteroscopic metroplasty. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:1098–1099.
47. PinetteM, KatzW, DrouinM, et al. Successful planned pregnancy following endometrial ablation with the YAG laser. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:242–243.
48. RogersonL, GannonB, O’DonovanP. Outcome of pregnancy following endometrial ablation. J Gynecol Surg 1997;13:155–160.
49. PropstAM, LibermanRF, HarlowBL, GinsburgES. Complications of hysteroscopic surgery: predicting patients at risk. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:517–520.