Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Writing team
- Foreword
- Preface
- List of acronyms and abbreviations
- Part I Climatic trends
- Part II Defining ‘dangerous climate change’
- Part III Equity issues
- Part IV Mitigation and adaptation approaches
- Part V Meeting the challenge
- 15 Integrating adaptation, mitigation and sustainable development
- 16 Mobilising the population
- 17 The human–Earth relationship: past, present and future
- Index
- Plate section
- References
16 - Mobilising the population
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 April 2011
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Writing team
- Foreword
- Preface
- List of acronyms and abbreviations
- Part I Climatic trends
- Part II Defining ‘dangerous climate change’
- Part III Equity issues
- Part IV Mitigation and adaptation approaches
- Part V Meeting the challenge
- 15 Integrating adaptation, mitigation and sustainable development
- 16 Mobilising the population
- 17 The human–Earth relationship: past, present and future
- Index
- Plate section
- References
Summary
‘Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has.’
An effective response to the risks of climate change can build on the ideas and actions of many different individuals – both as citizens and consumers, and as leaders of business and other organisations. Individual citizens can play an important role in the response to climate change, especially when they make decisions to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions or adapt to climate change encouraged by institutional structures and access to credible, understandable and relevant information. There is considerable evidence that individual behavioural change can contribute to reductions in emissions, especially from households and transportation and when supported by government policies, incentives and private sector activities.
Individuals are also engaged with climate change as decision-makers, members of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and voters in ways that influence the actions of governments and corporations. Public support is critical in the success of national and regional government actions, and public perceptions can impede the acceptance of mitigation technologies. Behavioural and attitudinal changes are also important in terms of political and corporate leadership where, for example, business leaders and city mayors have made significant commitments to emission reductions that go far beyond national political obligations or simple cost–benefit analysis. In terms of adaptation, millions of farmers and herders have adjusted their practices to past climate shifts and are already making decisions in response to the onset of warming and other shifts associated with climate change.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Climate Change: Global Risks, Challenges and Decisions , pp. 451 - 471Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
References
(2008). The role of local institutions in adaptation to climate change. Paper prepared for the Social Dimensions of Climate Change, Social Development Department. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
, and (2008). Cool rationalities and hot air: A rhetorical approach to understanding debates on renewable energy. Global Environmental Politics, 8, 67–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2007). Ethics of the discount rate in the Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. World Economics, 8, 187–210.Google Scholar
, , and (2007). Carbon Labelling: Report on Roundtable. 3–4 May, St Anne's College, University of Oxford. Oxford: UK Energy Research Centre.Google Scholar
, and (2008). Addressing consumer concerns about climate change. The McKinsey Quarterly (March).Google Scholar
(2009). We speak for the trees: media reporting on the environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34, 431–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007). Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: re-reading news on climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 16, 223–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008). Global Climate Change: Can Agriculture Cope?http://www.cgiar.org/impact/global/climate.html.Google Scholar
and (2008). Power relations: The politics of risk and procedure in nuclear waste governance. Environment and Planning A, 40, 1881–1900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2001). A comparative look at NGO influence in international environmental negotiations: desertification and climate change. Global Environmental Politics, 1, 86–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006). The Effectiveness of Feedback on Energy Consumption. A Review for DEFRA of the Literature on Metering, Billing and Direct Displays. Oxford: Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
, and (2005). Environmental values. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 30, 335–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005). Institutional change, climate risk, and rural vulnerability: Cases from central Mexico. World Development, 33, 1923–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006). Weathering Risk in Rural Mexico. Climatic, Institutional, and Economic Change. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
(2008). Europeans' attitudes towards climate change. Eurobarometer. Special Eurobarometer 200/Wave 69.2.
(2009). FAO Profile for Climate Change. Rome: FAO, http://www.fao.org/climatechange/en/.Google Scholar
and (2008). How the world should invest in energy efficiency. McKinsey Quarterly (July).Google Scholar
(2006). Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16, 253–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2008). The short list: The most effective actions US households can take to curb climate change. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 50, 12–24.Google Scholar
, , , and (2006). Polices for increasing energy efficiency: Thirty years of experience in OECD countries. Energy Policy, 34, 556–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2005). Green consumption or sustainable lifestyles? Identifying the sustainable consumer. Futures, 37, 481–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2009). Climate Concerns Continue to Increase: Global Poll. n.p.: Globescan/BBC World Service.Google Scholar
(2009). The Gold Standard: Premium Quality Carbon Credits. Basel: Gold Standard Foundation, http://assets.panda.org/downloads/gs_overview.pdf.Google Scholar
and (2004). NGO influence in the implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: compliance, flexibility mechanisms, and sinks. Global Environmental Politics, 4, 54–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2008). Deliberative speak at the turbine face: Community engagement, wind farms, and renewable energy transitions, in Australia. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 10, 217–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005). Climate change strategy: The business logic behind voluntary greenhouse gas reductions. California Management Review, 47, 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2009). Issues in Food Miles and Carbon Labelling. ABARE Research Report 09.18. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics.Google Scholar
, , et al. (2007). Adapting agriculture to climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 104, 19 691–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2007). Social acceptance of carbon dioxide storage. Energy Policy, 35, 2780–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007a). Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, eds. , , , and . Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2007b). Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, eds. , , , and . Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(ed.) (2006). The Earthscan Reader in Sustainable Consumption. London: Earthscan.
and (2004). The cement sustainability initiative – implementing change across a global industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 11, 114–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , and (eds.) (2007). Climate Change and Adaptation. London: Earthscan.
(2007). Public Perception, Opinion and Understanding of Climate Change – Current Patterns, Trends and Limitations. Occasional Paper 31. UNDP.Google Scholar
, and (2009). Major Tipping Points in the Earth's Climate System and Consequences for the Insurance Sector. Berlin: WWF.Google Scholar
, and (1993). Some Like it Hot: Climate Change, Biodiversity and the Survival of Species. Gland: WWF International.Google Scholar
(2007). How companies think about climate change: a McKinsey global survey. McKinsey Quarterly (February).Google Scholar
(2000). Climate for Change: Non-state Actors and the Global Politics of the Greenhouse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2008). Civil society, corporate accountability and the politics of climate change. Global Environmental Politics, 8, 122–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007). An exploration of motivations, drivers and barriers to carbon management: The UK FTSE 100. European Management Journal, 25, 475–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2009). Conceptualizing climate governance beyond the international regime. Global Environmental Politics, 9, 58–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2009). 25-Nation 2009 Pew Global Attitudes Survey. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
, and (2008). Climate change or nuclear power – No thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain. Global Environmental Change, 18, 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001). Nonstate actors in the global climate regime. In International Relations and Global Climate Change, eds. and . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 95–117.Google Scholar
and (2005). Carbon dioxide emissions and climate change: Policy implications for the cement industry. Environmental Science and Policy, 8, 105–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006). Participatory processes for designing environmental policies. Land Use Policy, 23, 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2008). Risk, Inequality and Time in the Welfare Economics of Climate Change: Is the Workhorse Model Underspecified? Economics Series Working Paper 400. Oxford: University of Oxford, Department of Economics.Google Scholar
and (2007). Global food security under climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 104, 19703–08.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, and (2005). The public perception of carbon dioxide capture and storage in the UK: Results from focus groups and a survey. Climate Policy, 4, 377–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (2009). Public risk perspectives on the geologic storage of carbon dioxide. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 3, 100–07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992). Perception of risk: Reflections on the psychometric paradigm. In Social Theories of Risk, eds. and . New York, NY: Praeger, pp. 117–52.Google Scholar
and (2002). Adaptation options in agriculture to climate change: A typology. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 7, 85–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2006). Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16, 282–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds.) (2003). Climate Change, Adaptive Capacity and Development. London: Imperial College Press.CrossRef
, , et al. (2006). Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change. London: HM Treasury.Google Scholar
(2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and (2010). Trust and community: Exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy. Energy Policy 38 (6), 2655–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2009). Community perceptions of carbon sequestration: Insights from California. Environmental Research Letters, 4, 034002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2010). World Development Report 2010: Development and Climate Change. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.Google Scholar