Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T04:15:41.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Climate change as a global test for contemporary political institutions and theories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2011

By
Stephen M. Gardiner
Edited by
Karen O'Brien ,
Asunción Lera St. Clair  and
Berit Kristoffersen
Stephen M. Gardiner
Affiliation:
University of Washington, Seattle, USA
Karen O'Brien
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo
Asunción Lera St. Clair
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Bergen, Norway
Berit Kristoffersen
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Tromsø, Norway
Get access

Summary

If political leaders have one duty above all others, it is to protect the security of their people … And yet our long-term security is threatened by a problem at least as dangerous as chemical, nuclear or biological weapons, or indeed international terrorism: human-induced climate change.

Houghton (2003)

Why should political philosophy be concerned about global environmental change, in general, and climate change, in particular? Why aren't these just normal political problems, perplexing in their scale, perhaps, but not fundamentally different to most other problems in domestic and international affairs? Why isn't the political problem, insofar as there is one, simply that certain actors have behaved badly, for the usual political reasons? This chapter is an attempt to offer one central answer to such questions. It does so by advancing a minimal global test for social and political institutions and theories, and then suggesting that conventional versions of both may fail in the case of climate change. If this argument is correct, then climate change presents a major challenge to global systems. This implies that the current, almost exclusive, focus on scientific and economic questions is a dangerous mistake.

The structure of the chapter is as follows. The first section, “The global test,” introduces the global test and provides some general reasons for believing that it may apply in the case of climate change.

Type
Chapter
Information
Climate Change, Ethics and Human Security , pp. 131 - 154
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Azar, C and Lindgren, K. 2003. Catastrophic events and stochastic cost–benefit analysis of climate change. Climatic Change, 56(3), 245–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, J. 1992. Counting the Cost of Global Warming. Isle of Harris, UK: White Horse Press.Google Scholar
Brown, P. 2001. World deal on climate isolates US. Manchester Guardian, July 24, 2001.
Cowen, T. and Parfit, D. 1992. Against the social discount rate. In Laslett, P. and Fishkin, J. S., eds., Justice Between Age Groups and Generations. New Haven, CT: Yale, pp. 144–61.Google Scholar
DeSombre, E. 2004. Global warming: more common than tragic. Ethics and International Affairs, 18, 41–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, J. 1987. Rational Ecology: Environment and Political Economy. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gardiner, S. 2004a. Ethics and global climate change. Ethics, 114, 555–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, S. 2004b. The global warming tragedy and the dangerous illusion of the Kyoto Protocol. Ethics and International Affairs, 18(1), 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, S. 2006a. A perfect moral storm: climate change, intergenerational ethics and the problem of moral corruption. Environmental Values, 15, 397–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, S. 2006b. Why do Future Generations Need Protection? Working Paper. Chaire developpement durable. Available online: http://ceco.polytechnique.fr/CDD/PDF/DDX-06–16.pdf.
Gardiner, S. 2009. Saved by disaster? Abrupt climate change, political inertia and the possibility of an intergenerational arms race. Journal of Social Philosophy, 40(2), 140–62. Special Issue on Global Environmental Issues, edited by Tim Hayward.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, S. In press. A Perfect Moral Storm: Climate Change: Intergenerational Ethics and the Global Environmental Tragedy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Houghton, J. 2003. Global warming is now a weapon of mass destruction. Manchester Guardian, July 28, 2003.
,IPCC 2007. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jamieson, D. 1992. Ethics, public policy and global warming. Science, Technology, Human Values, 17(2), 139–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, D. 2007. When utilitarians should be virtue theorists. Utilitas, 19(2), 160–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKibben, B. 1989. The End of Nature. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
McKibben, B. 2001. Some like it hot: Bush in the greenhouse. New York Review of Books, July 5, 2001.
Marland, G., Boden, T. and Andreas, R. J. 2008. Global CO2 Emissions from Fossil-Fuel Burning, Cement Manufacture, and Gas Flaring: 1751–2005. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, United States Department of Energy. Available online: http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/emis/glo.htm.
Mill, J. S. 1863. Utilitarianism. London: Parker, Son and Bourn.Google Scholar
Moore, F. 2008. Carbon dioxide emissions accelerating rapidly. Earth Policy Institute. Available online: http://www.earth-policy.org/Indicators/CO2/2008.htm.
Parfit, D. 1986. Reasons and Persons. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagoff, M. 1988. The Economy of the Earth. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. 2005. It's not my fault. In Sinnott-Armstrong, W. and Howarth, R., eds., Perspectives on Climate Change. Oxford, UK: Elsevier, pp. 221–53.Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. and Williams, B. 1973. Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spash, C. L. 2002. Greenhouse Economics: Value and Ethics. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, N. 2008. The Economics of Climate Change. American Economic Review, 98(2), 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×