Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2016
  • Online publication date: October 2016


Abecassis, D., The Law and Practice Relating to Oil Pollution from Ships (London: Butterworth, 1978).
Abraham, K., ‘Catastrophic oil spills and the problem of insurance’. Vanderbilt Law Review 64 (2011), 1769–91.
Aldersey-Williams, J., ‘Liability for oil spills – the UKCS legal regime’, presented at the OSPRAG Summit, UK Oil Spill Prevention and Response, September 21, 2011.
Allen, C H., ‘Proving natural resource damage under OPA 90: out with the rebuttable presumption, in with APA-style judicial review?’, Tulane Law Review 85 (2011), 1039–74.
Ameye, E., ‘Legal study on nuclear third party liability for DG TREN of the European Commission’, in Pelzer, N. (ed.), European Nuclear Liability Law in a Process of Change (Berlin, Tagungsbericht der AIDN/INLA-Regionaltagung, 2009; Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2010), pp 147–56.
Anderson, C B., ‘Damage to natural resources and the costs of restoration’, Tulane Law Review 72 (1997), 417–92.
Arrow, K., Aspects of the Theory of Risk-Bearing (Helsinki: Yrjö Jahnssonin Säätiö, 1965).
Australian Government, ‘Final government response to the Report of the Montara Commission of Inquiry’, Melbourne, 2011.
Australian Maritime Safety Authority, ‘Response to the Montara wellhead platform incident’, Report of the Incident Analysis Team, March 2010; available at:
Baatsma, B., Felsö, F., Van Geffen, S., Mulder, J. & Oostdijk, A., Zelf doen? Inventarisatiestudie van zelfreguleringsinstrumenten, Onderzoek in opdracht van het Ministerie van Economische Zaken (Amsterdam, 2003).
Barrett, S., ‘European environmental liability options’ (January 10, 2013); available at:
Bawcut, P A., Captive Insurance Companies: Establishment, Operation and Management (New York: Woodhead-Faulkner, 1991).
BDO Consulting, ‘Independent evaluation of the Gulf Coast claims facility: report of findings and observations’, research commissioned by the US Department of Justice (June 5, 2012); available at:
Bennet, P., ‘Mutual risk: P&I insurance clubs and maritime safety and environmental performance’, Marine Policy 25 (2001), 13–21.
Bergkamp, L., ‘The proper scope of joint and civil liability’, Tijdschrift voor Milieuaansprakelijkheid [Environmental Liability Review] (2000), 153–6.
Bergkamp, L., & Van Bergeijk, A., ‘Scope of the ELD regime’, in Bergkamp, L. and Goldsmith, B J. (eds.), The EU Environmental Liability Directive: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2013), pp 51–79.
Bernasconi-Osterwalder, N. & Hoffmann, R T., ‘The German nuclear phase-out put to the test in international investment arbitration’ (Berlin/Amsterdam 2013); available at:
Bio by Deloitte, ‘Civil liability, financial security and compensation claims for offshore oil and gas activities in the European Economic Area’, Final report prepared for the European Commission, DG Energy (Brussels, August 14, 2014).
Bio Intelligence Service et al., ‘Study to explore the feasibility of creating a fund to cover environmental liability and losses occurring from industrial accidents’, Final report prepared for the European Commission, DG ENV (March 25, 2013).
Blanchard, P., ‘Responsibility for environmental damage under nuclear and environmental instruments: a legal benchmarking’, Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law 18 (2000), 233–53.
Bocken, H., ‘Alternatives to liability and liability insurance for the compensation of pollution damages’, part 1, Tijdschrift voor Milieuaansprakelijkheid 1 (1987), 83–7.
Bocken, H., ‘Alternatives to liability and liability insurance for the compensation of pollution damages’, part 2, Tijdschrift voor Milieuaansprakelijkheid 1 (1988), 3–10.
Bocken, H., ‘Alternative financial guarantees for environmental liabilities under the ELD’, European Energy and Environmental Law Review 18 (2009), 146–70.
Hamilton, Booz Allen, ‘The offshore oil and gas industry report on insurance’, part 1, October 5, 2010; available at:
Hamilton, Booz Allen, ‘The offshore oil and gas industry report on insurance’, part 3, October 29, 2010; available at:
Borthwick, D., ‘Report of the Montara Commission of Inquiry’, June 2010.
Bosma, S., ‘The regulation of marine pollution arising from offshore oil and gas facilities: an evaluation of the adequacy of current regulatory regimes and the responsibility of states to implement a new liability regime’, Australia and New Zealand Maritime Law Journal 26 (2012), 89–117.
Boyd, J., ‘A market-based analysis of financial insurance issues associated with US national resource damage liability’, in Faure, M. (ed.), Deterrence, Insurability, and Compensation in Environmental Liability: Future Developments in the European Union (Vienna: Springer, 2003), pp 258–302.
Boyd, J., ‘Compensation for oil pollution damages: the American Oil Pollution Act as an example for global solutions?’, in Faure, M. and Hu, J. (eds.), Prevention and Compensation of Marine Pollution Damage (New York: Kluwer Law International, 2006), pp 137–63.
Boyer, M. & Porrini, D., ‘The efficient liability sharing factor for environmental disasters: lessons for optimal insurance regulation’, Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practices 33 (2008), 337–62.
BP, ‘BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2013’; available at:
BP, ‘BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2014’; available at:
Brownie, I., Principles of International Law, edn. (Oxford University Press, 2008).
Bruggeman, V., ‘Capital market instruments for natural catastrophe and terrorism risks: a bright future?’, Environmental Law Reporter 40 (2010), 10136–53.
Bruggeman, V., Faure, M G. & Fiore, K., ‘The government as reinsurer of catastrophic risks?’, Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory 35 (2010), 369–90.
Bruggeman, V., Faure, M G. & Fiore, K., Faure, M G. & Heldt, T., ‘Insurance against catastrophe: government stimulation of insurance markets for catastrophic events’, Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum 23 (2012), 185–241.
Budiman, A., ‘On liability for offshore oil spillage: strictly settled’, International Bar Association Oil and Gas Law Publications; available at:
Cafaggi, F., ‘New foundations of transnational private regulation’, Journal of Law and Society 38 (2011), 20–49.
Calabresi, G., The Costs of Accidents: A Legal and Economic Analysis (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1970).
Cameron, P.Liability for catastrophic risk in the oil and gas industry’, International Energy Law Review 6 (2012), 207–19.
Campbell, A.J., ‘Self-regulation and the media’, Federal Communications Law Journal 51 (1999), 711–72.
Canadian Centre for Energy Information, ‘Canada's evolving offshore oil and gas industry 2004’; available at:
Cane, P., ‘Tort law as regulation’, Common Law World Review 31 (2002), 305–31.
Carrol, S., ‘Perspective on the pros and cons of a pooling type approach to nuclear third party liability’, Nuclear Bulletin (2008), 75–97.
Chazan, G., ‘Mediterranean playground for oil groups’, Financial Times (2 September 2012); available at:
Christou, M. & Konstantinidou, M., ‘Safety of offshore oil and gas operations: lessons from past accident analysis – ensuring EU hydrocarbon supply through better control of major hazards’, JRC Scientific and Policy Reports (2012); available at:
Coghlin, T G., ‘Protection and indemnity clubs’, Lloyds Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly (1984), 403–16.
Coglianese, C. & Lazer, D., ‘Management-based regulation: prescribing private management to achieve public goals’, Law & Society Review 37 (2003), 691–730.
Cohen, M., Gottlieb, M. Linn, J. & Richardson, N., ‘Deepwater drilling: law, policy, and economics of firm organization and safety’, Vanderbilt Law Review 64 (2011), 1853–1916.
Conk, G., ‘BP and Kenneth Feinberg's Gulf Coast gambit’, Roger Williams University Law Review 17 (2012), 137–83.
Coune, C., ‘Wet van 13 november 2011 betreffende de vergoeding van de lichamelijke en morele schade ingevolge een technologisch ongeval’, Tijdschrift voor Belgisch Handelsrecht 5 (2012), 5–39.
Courbage, Chr. & Stahel, W R. (eds.), Extreme Events and Insurance: 2011 Annus Horribilis (The Geneva Reports No. 5) (The Geneva Association, 2012).
Crawford, E., ‘Australia's lack of compliance with international legal principles of trans-boundary harm: a case study of the Montara incident’, presentation at a seminar organized by the Australian National Center for Ocean Resources and Security (ANCORS) and University of Wollongong, NSW, 12 May 2011; available at:
Cross, F., ‘Natural resource damage valuation’, Vanderbilt Law Review 42 (1989), 269–341.
Currie, D E J., ‘The problems and gaps in the nuclear liability conventions and an analysis of how an actual claim would be brought under the current existing treaty regime in the event of a nuclear accident’, Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 35 (2008), 85–128.
Dagg, J., Holroyd, P., Lemphers, N., Lucas, R. & Thibault, B., ‘Comparing the offshore drilling regulatory regimes of the Canadian Arctic, the US, the UK, Greenland and Norway’, The Pembina Institute, June 2011.
Daintith, T., Discretion in the Administration of Offshore Oil and Gas: A Comparative Study (Melbourne: AMPLA, Ltd., 2006).
Danish Energy Agency, ‘A guide to hydrocarbon licenses in Denmark: exploration and drilling activities’ (September 2011).
Danish Energy Agency, ‘Oil and gas production in Denmark and subsoil use 2013’ (June 2014).
De La Rue, C. & Anderson, C B., Shipping and the Environment: Law and Practice (London: LLP, 2009).
De Smedt, K., Environmental Liability in a Federal System: A Law and Economic Analysis (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2007).
DECC (Department of Energy and Climate Change), ‘Guidance note to UK offshore oil and gas operators on the demonstration of financial responsibility before consent may be granted for exploration and appraisal wells on the UKCS’ (2012).
Diamond, P., ‘Single activities accidents’, Journal of Legal Studies (1974), 107–64.
Doherty, N A., Grace, M F., Klein, R W., et al., ‘Managing large-scale risks in a new era of catastrophes. Insuring, mitigating and financing recovery from natural disasters in the United States’ (Wharton Risk Management and Decision Processing Centre in conjunction with the Georgia State University and the Insurance Information Institute, March 2008); available at:
Dowding, T., Global Developments in Captive Insurance (London: Pearson, 1997).
Dubin, J. & Rothwell, G., ‘Subsidy to nuclear power through Price Anderson liability limit’, Contemporary Economic Policy 8 (1990), 73–9.
Ducrotoy, J P. & Elliot, M., ‘The science and management of the North Sea and the Baltic Sea: natural history, present threats and future challenges’, Marine Pollution Bulletin 57 (2008), 8–21.
Durant, I C., ‘Belgium’, in Faure, M. and Hartlief, T. (eds.), Financial Compensation for Victims Of Catastrophes: A Comparative Legal Approach (Vienna: Springer, 2006), pp 37–79.
Easo, J., ‘Managing the risk of catastrophic events on the UK continental shelf’, Ashurst Energy Source 7 (2010), 18–22.
EIA (Energy Information Administration) and Office of Oil and Gas, ‘Overview of US legislation and regulations affecting offshore natural gas and oil activity’ (September 2005).
ELINI, ‘Annual Report 2010’, (Brussels 2010); available at:
EMANI (European Mutual Association For Nuclear Insurance), ‘Annual Report 2013’ (Brussels 2013); available at:
Emmerson, C., Arctic Opening: Opportunity and Risk in the High North (London: Lloyd's and Chatham House, 2012).
Emons, W., ‘Imperfect tests and natural insurance monopolies’, Journal of Industrial Economics 49 (2001), 247–68.
Energy and Climate Change Committee, ‘UK deepwater drilling – implications of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill’, Second report of Session 2010–11, Volume 1 (House of Commons, 6 January 2011); available at:
Epstein, R., ‘Catastrophic responses to catastrophic risks’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 12 (1996), 287–308.
Ernst, & Young, , ‘Study on co(re)insurance pools and on ad-hoc co(re)insurance agreements on the subscription market’ (Luxembourg: European Commission, February 2013); available at:
Faure, M., ‘Economic models of compensation for damage caused by nuclear accidents: some lessons for the revision of the Paris and Vienna Conventions’, European Journal of Law and Economics (1995), 21–43.
Faure, M., ‘How law and economics may contribute to the harmonization of tort law in Europe?’, in Zimmerman, R. (ed.), Grundstrukturen des europäischen Deliktsrechts (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2002), pp 31–82.
Faure, M., ‘Alternative compensation mechanisms as remedy for uninsurability of liability’, Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance 29 (2004), 455–89.
Faure, M., ‘Economic criteria for compulsory insurance’, Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance 31 (2006), 149–68.
Faure, M., ‘Financial compensation for victims of catastrophes: a law and economics perspective’, Law and Policy 29 (2007), 339–67.
Faure, M., ‘Environmental liability’, in Faure, M G. (ed.), Tort Law and Economics, Vol. 1 (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2009), pp 247–86.
Faure, M., & Betlem, G., ‘Applying national liability law to transboundary pollution: some lessons from Europe and the United States’, in Faure, M. and Song, Y. (eds.), China and international environmental liability: Legal remedies for Trans-Boundary Pollution (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2008), pp 129–91.
Faure, M., & Bruggeman, V., ‘Catastrophic risks and first-party insurance’, Connecticut Insurance Law Journal 15 (2008), 1–52.
Faure, M., & Fiore, K., ‘The coverage of the nuclear risk in Europe: which alternative?’, Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance – Issues and Practices 33 (2008), 288–322.
Faure, M., & Fiore, K., ‘An economic analysis of the nuclear liability subsidy’, Pace Environmental Law Review 26 (2009), 419–47.
Faure, M., & Grimeaud, D., ‘Financial assurance issues of environmental liability’, in Faure, M. (ed.), Deterrence, Inusrability, and Compensation in Environmental Liability: Future Developments in the European Union (Wien: Springer, 2003), pp 7–255.
Faure, M., & Hartlief, T. (eds.), Insurance and Expanding Systemic Risks, Policy Issues in Insurance, No. 5 (Paris: OECD, 2003).
Faure, M., & Liu, J., ‘Compensating for nuclear accidents in Japan: the Fukushima case’, TGMA 2 (2012), 74–84.
Faure, M., & Liu, J., ‘The Tsunami of March 2011 and the subsequent nuclear incident at Fukushima: who compensates the victims?’, William & Mary Environmental Law & Policy Review 37 (2012), 129–218.
Faure, M., & Skogh, G., ‘Compensation for damages caused by nuclear accidents: a convention as insurance’, Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance – Issues and Practice 65 (1992), 499–513.
Faure, M., & Van den Bergh, R., ‘Negligence, strict liability and regulation of safety under Belgian law: an introductory economic analysis’, Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance (1987), 95–114.
Faure, M., & Van den Bergh, R., ‘Restrictions of competition on insurance markets and the applicability of EC anti-trust law’, Kyklos (1995), 65–85.
Faure, M., & Vanden Borre, T., ‘Compensating nuclear damage: a comparative economic analysis of the US and international liability schemes’, William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review 32 (2008), 219–87.
Faure, M., & Wang, H., ‘Economic analysis of compensation for oil pollution damage’, Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce 37 (2006), 179–217.
Finken, S. & Laux, C., ‘Catastrophe bonds and reinsurance: the competitive effect of information-insensitive triggers’, Journal of Risk and Insurance 76 (2009), 579–605.
Force, R., Davies, M. & Force, J S., ‘Deepwater Horizon: removal costs, civil damages, crimes, civil penalties, and state remedies in oil spill cases’, Tulane Law Review 85 (2011), 889–982.
Fowler, D., ‘Offshore oil: a frontier for international lawmaking’, Chicago-Kent Journal of International and Comparative Law (Spring 2012); available at:
Froot, K A., The Financing of Catastrophe Risk (University of Chicago Press, 1999).
Gao, Z. (ed.), Environmental Regulation of Oil and Gas (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 1998).
GCCF (Gulf Coast Claims Facility), ‘Gulf Coast Claims Facility protocol for emergency advance payments’ (23 August 2010); available at:
GCCF, ‘Protocol for interim and final claims’; available at:
Gilead, I., ‘Tort law and internalization: the gap between private loss and social cost’, International Review of Law and Economics (1997), 589–608.
Gittus, J., ‘Introducing nuclear power to Australia: an economic comparison’, Report prepared for the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization (2006); available at:
GL Noble Denton, ‘UK responses to EC impact assessment on offshore regulation’ (November 2011).
Gollier, C., ‘Some aspects of the economics of catastrophe risk insurance’, in OECD, (eds.), Catastrophic Risks and Insurance, Vol. 8 (Paris: OECD Publishing, 2005), pp 13–30.
Gómez, C. & Green, D R., ‘The impact of oil and gas drilling accidents on EU fisheries’, Directorate-General for Internal Policies, Policy Department Structural and Cohesion Policies (Brussels: European Parliament, 2013).
Gomez-Acebo & Pombo Abogados SCP, ‘Legal study for the accession of EURATOM to the Paris Convention on Third Party Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy’, Final Report, TREN/CC/01–2005 (Brussels: European Commission); available at:
Greenspan, D E. & Neuburger, M A., ‘Settle or sue? The use and structure of alternative compensation programs in the mass claims context’, Roger Williams University Law Review 17 (2012), 97–136.
Gron, A. & Sykes, A., ‘A role for government’, Regulation 25 (2002), 44–51.
Gron, A. & Sykes, A., & Sykes, A., ‘Terrorism and insurance markets: a role for the government as insurer?’, Indiana Law Review 36 (2003), 447–63.
Handrlica, J., ‘Harmonization of nuclear liability in the European Union: challenges, options and limits’, Nuclear Law Bulletin 84 (2009), 37–60.
Harrington, S E., ‘Rethinking disaster policy’, Regulation – Decato Review of Business and Government 23 (2000), 40–6.
Hazelwood, S. & Semark, D., P &I Clubs: Law and Practice, edn. (London: Informa Law from Routledge, 2010).
Health and Safety Executive, ‘Offshore hydrocarbon releases 2001–2008’, RR672 Research Report (2008); available at:
Heyes, A. & Liston-Heyes, C., ‘Subsidy to nuclear power through Price-Anderson liability limit: comment’, Contemporary Economic Policy 16 (1998), 122–4.
Hilton, K N., ‘When should we prefer tort law to environmental regulation?’, Washburn Law Journal 41 (2002), 515–43.
Hinghofer-Szalskay, D. & Koch, B A., ‘Austria’, in Faure, M. and Hartlief, T. (eds.), Financial Compensation for Victims of Catastrophes: A Comparative Legal Approach (Vienna: Springer, 2006), pp 7–36.
HSE, ‘Annual offshore statistics and regulatory activity report 2013–2014’ (December 2014).
Hu, J Z., ‘Legal issues from the Hebei Spirit oil spill incident’, in Faure, M G., Han, L. & Shan, H. (eds.), Marine Pollution Liability and Policy: China, Europe and the US (Alphen a/d Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2010), pp 399–412.
International Atomic Energy Agency, ‘Status: Convention on Supplementary Compensation For Nuclear Damage 1 (21 May 2008); available at:
International Oil Pollution Compensation Fund, ‘Guidelines for presenting claims in the fisheries, mariculture and fish processing sector’ (December 2008).
International Oil Pollution Compensation Fund, ‘Claims Manual’ (December 2013); available at:
Izundu, U., ‘Prospects slowly brighten for operations off Europe’, Oil and Gas Journal 108 (2010), 49–59.
Jaffee, D M., ‘Report on the role of government in the coverage of terrorism risks’, Presented at the Conference on Catastrophic Risks and Insurance, Paris. OECD, 22–23 November 2004.
Janssen, J J G., ‘Preventing a next Deepwater Horizon? Evaluation of the regime for the prevention of and response to accidental oil spills’, MSc Thesis, Utrecht University, 2012.
Jose, D. & Garza, M., ‘The complete federal pre-emption of nuclear safety should prevent scientifically irrational jury verdicts in radiation litigation’, Temple Journal of Science, Technology and Environmental Law 26 (2007), 1–25.
Jost, P J., ‘Limited liability and the requirement to purchase insurance’, International Review of Law and Economics (1996), 259–76.
Kerr, R., Kintisch, E. & Stokstad, E., ‘Will Deepwater Horizon set a new standard for catastrophe?’, Science 328 (2010), 674–5.
Kiern, L I., ‘Liability, Compensation, and financial responsibility under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990: a review of the first decade’, Tulane Maritime Law Journal 24 (2000), 481–590.
King, R., ‘Deepwater Horizon oil spill disaster: risk, recovery, and insurance implications’, Congressional Research Service Report for Congress (12 July 2010).
Klass, A B. & Wilson, E J., ‘Climate change and carbon sequestration: assessing a liability regime for long-term storage of carbon dioxide’, Emory Law Journal 58 (2008), 103–80.
Koivurova, T., ‘The future of the Nordic Environment Protection Convention’, Nordic Journal of International Law 66 (1997), 505–26.
Kollewe, J., ‘Oil industry set for surge in insurance premiums after Deepwater disaster’, The Guardian (20 September 2010); available at:
Kornhauser, L A. & Revesz, R L., ‘Sharing damages upon multiple tortfeasors’, Yale Law Journal 98 (1989), 831–84.
Kornhauser, L A. & Revesz, R L., ‘Apportioning damages among potentially insolvent actors’, Journal of Legal Studies 19 (1990), 617–51.
Koziol, H., ‘Die Arzhaftung im geltenden und künftigen Recht’, in Barta, H. (ed.), Haftungsrechtliche Perspektiven der ärzlichen Behandlung (Trauner, 1997), pp 21–35.
KPMG Global Energy Institute, ‘After the Gulf of Mexico oil spill: recent developments in the oil and gas industry’; (2011); available at:
Kunreuther, H., ‘Mitigating disaster losses through insurance’, Journal of Risk and Incertainty 12 (1996), 171–87.
Kunreuther, H., Freeman, P., ‘Insurability, environmental risks and the law’, in Heyes, A. (ed.), The Law and Economics of the Environment, (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2001), pp 304–16.
Kunreuther, H., & Michel-Kerjan, E., ‘Challenges for terrorism risk insurance in the United States’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 18 (2004), 201–14.
Kunreuther, H., & Michel-Kerjan, E., ‘Insurability of (mega-)terrorism risk: challenges and perspectives’, in Terrorism Risk Insurance in OECD Countries (Paris: OECD Publishing 2005), pp 107–48.
Kunreuther, H., & Pauly, M., ‘Rules rather than discretion: lessons from Hurricane Katrina’, Journal of Risk and Incertainty 33 (2006), 101–16.
Lamm, V., ‘The protocol amending the 1963 Vienna Convention’, in OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, International Atomic Energy Agency, International Nuclear Law in the Post-Chernobyl Period (Paris: OECD, 2006), pp 169–88.
Landes, W. & Posner, R., ‘The positive economic theory of tort law’, Georgia Law Review (1981), 851–924.
Landes, W., & Posner, R., ‘Tort law as a regulatory regime for catastrophic personal injuries’, Journal of Legal Studies (1984), 417–34.
Lee, A V., Bridgen, P J. & Environment International, Ltd., The Natural Resource Damage Assessment Deskbook: A Legal and Technical Analysis (Washington, DC: Environmental Law Institute, 2002).
Letourneau, K. & Welmaker, W., ‘The Oil Pollution Act of 1990: federal judicial interpretation through the end of the millennium’, University of San Francisco Maritime Law Journal 12 (2000), 147–226.
Levmore, S. & Logue, K D., ‘Insuring against terrorism – and crime’, Michigan Law Review 102 (2003), 268–327.
Libby, G E., ‘Some aspects of protection and indemnity insurance’, Marine and Inland Marine Insurance Law (1952), 684–709.
Liu, J., Compensating Ecological Damage: Comparative and Economic Observations (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2013).
Liu, J., & Faure, M., ‘Nuclear liability in China’, Washington Global Studies Law Review (2013), 781–816.
Lloyd, 's, ‘Emerging risks report:, behaviour: bear, bull or lemming?’; available at:
Lloyd, 's, ‘Drilling in extreme environments: challenges and implications for the energy insurance industry’, (2011); available at:
Lloyd, 's, Energy Quarterly Newsletter (January 2015).
Mackaay, E., Economics of Information and the Law (Boston: Kluwer, 1982).
Magnus, U., ‘Germany’, in Faure, M. and Hartlief, T. (eds.), Compensation for Victims of Catastrophes: A Comparative Legal Approach (Vienna: Springer, 2006), pp 119–44.
Marsh, ‘A guide to oil insurance limited 2014’; available at:
Mason, M., ‘Civil liability for oil pollution damage: examining the evolving scope for environmental compensation in the international regime’, Marine Policy 27 (2003), 3–5.
McClure, R., ‘A review of nuclear energy insurance’, in Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society, Volume LV (Boston: Sperry Rand Corporation, 1968), pp 255–94.
McDonell, C., ‘The Gulf Coast claims facility and the Deepwater Horizon litigation: judicial regulation of private compensation schemes’, Stanford Law Review 64 (2012), 765–95.
Meadow, W. & Sunstein, C., ‘Statistics, Not Experts’, Duke Law Journal 51 (2001).
Mez, L. & Piening, A., ‘Phasing-out nuclear power generation in Germany: policies, actors, issues and non-issues’, Energy & Environment 13 (2002), 161–81.
Miller, J C., ‘The FTC and voluntary standards: maximizing the net benefits of self-regulation’, The Cato Journal, 4 (1985), 897–903.
Ministry of Petroleum and Energy (Norway), ‘Facts: the Norwegian petroleum sector 2014’ (2014).
Montara Commission of Inquiry, ‘Report of the Montara Commission of Inquiry’ (2010).
Monti, A., ‘Environmental risk: a comparative law and economics approach to liability and insurance’, European Review of Private Law, (2001), 51–79.
Monti, A., ‘Public – private initiatives to cover extreme events’ in Courbage, C. and Stahel, W.R. (eds.), Extreme events and insurance: 2011 annus horribilis (Geneva: the Geneva Association, 2012), 27–38.
Mortimer, S., ‘Cat bond investors not scared off by Japan quake, Insurance Journal, (16 May 2011), available at:
National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling, ‘A brief history of offshore oil drilling’, Staff Working Paper No. 1, (2010), available at:
National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling, ‘A competent and nimble regulator: a new approach to risk assessment and management’, staff working paper no. 21, (2010); available at:
National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling, ‘Final report’ (January 2011).
National Post's Financial Post & FP Investing (Canada), ‘Shell wants US to adopt tougher drilling standards used in North Sea’ (15 October 2010).
NEIL (Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited), ‘Annual Report 2014’, Editorial Section (Wilmington/Dublin); available at:
NEIL (Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited), ‘Annual Report 2014’, Financial Section (Wilmington/Dublin); available at:
Norwegian Ministry of Trade and Industry, ‘The state's ownership report 2013’; available at:
Nyman, F., ‘Ferma opposes environmental liability fund’ (30 November 2012); available at:
O'Connor, R., ‘Update: Lloyd's offshore energy market draws lessons from Deepwater Horizon’ (16 March 2012); available at:
OCIL (Oil Casualty Insurance, Ltd.), ‘Annual Report 2014’; available at:
Office of the Inspector of Transport Security, ‘Offshore oil and gas resources sector security inquiry’ (Department of Infrastructure and Transport, Australian Government, June 2012).
‘Offshore oil and gas in the UK: an independent review of the regulatory regime’, (December 2011); available at:
OGP (International Association of Oil & Gas Producers), ‘Risk assessment data directory’, report no. 434–17 (March 2010).
Ogus, A I., ‘Rethinking self-regulation’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 15 (1995), 97–108.
Ogus, A I., ‘Self-regulation’ in Bouckaert, B. and Geest, G. De (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2000), pp 587–602.
Oil and Gas UK, ‘Guidelines on relief well planning subsea wells’ (London, January 2012).
Oil and Gas UK, ‘Guidelines to assist licensees in demonstrating financial responsibility to DECC for the consent of exploration and appraisal wells in the UKCS’, Issue 1 (November 2012).
Oil and Gas UK, ‘Health and safety report 2014’ (2014).
Oil and Gas UK, ‘Environment report 2014’ (2014).
Oil and Gas UK, ‘Economic report 2014’ (2014).
Oil and Gas UK, & OPOL, ‘Oil spill cost study: OPOL financial limits’ (February 2012); available at:
Oil Insurance Limited, ‘Annual Report 2014’ (Hamilton); available at: http://eproxymaterials. com/interactive/oilinsurancelimited2014/.
Oil Insurance Limited, ‘Shareholders’ agreement’ (Hamilton, March 2014); available at:
OPOL, ‘The Offshore Pollution Liability Association limited report and financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2013’ (London, 2013); available at:
OSPRAG (UK Oil Spill Prevention and Response Advisory Group), ‘Strengthening UK prevention and response’, Final report (September 2011).
Papavizas, C G. & Kiern, L I., ‘2009–2010 maritime legislative developments’, Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce 41 (2011), 291–453.
Pelzer, N., ‘International pooling of operators’ funds: an option to increase the amount of financial security to cover nuclear liability’, Nuclear Law Bulletin 79 (2007), 37–55.
Perry, R., ‘The Deepwater Horizon oil spill and the limits of civil liability’, Washington Law Review 86 (2011), 1–68.
Petroleum Safety Authority (Norway), ‘Annual Report 2013’ (2013).
Petroleum Safety Authority (Norway), ‘Safety status and signals 2012–2013’ (2013).
Petroleum Safety Authority (Norway), ‘Trends in risk level in the petroleum activity: summary report 2014 – Norwegian continental shelf’ (2014).
Philipsen, N J., Regulation of and by Pharmacists in the Netherlands and Belgium: An Economic Approach (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2003).
Polborn, M., ‘Mandatory insurance and the judgement-proof problem’, International Review of Law and Economics (1998), 141–46.
Polinsky, A M., Introduction to Law and Economics (Boston: Little, Brown, 1983).
Posner, R A., Economic Analysis of Law, edn. (New York: Aspen, 2003).
Posner, R A. Catastrophe. Risk and Response (Oxford University Press, 2004).
Priest, G., ‘The current insurance crisis and modern tort law’, Yale Law Journal (1987), 1521–90.
Priest, G., ‘The government, the market and the problem of catastrophic loss’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 12 (1996), 219–37.
Rachlinski, J J., ‘A positive psychological theory of judging in hindsight’, University of Chicago Law Review 65 (1998), 571–625.
Radetzki, M. & Radetzki, M., ‘Private arrangements to cover large-scale liabilities caused by nuclear and other industrial catastrophes’, Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance (2000) 180–95.
Ramseur, J., ‘Liability and compensation issues raised by the 2010 Gulf oil spill’, Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, R41679 (11 March 2011).
Ramseur, J., & Hagerty, C L., ‘Deepwater Horizon oil spill: recent activities and ongoing developments’, Congressional Research Service Report for Congress (31 January 2013).
Ramseyer, M., ‘Why power companies build nuclear reactors on fault lines: the case of Japan’, Theoretical Inquiries in Law 31 (2011), 457–86.
Reader, Th W., ‘Is self-regulation the best option for the advertising industry in the European Union? An argument for the harmonization of advertising laws through the continued use of directors’, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Business Law 16 (1995), 181–215.
Rees, A. & Sharp, D., Drilling in Extreme Environments: Challenges and Implications for the Energy Insurance Industry (London: Lloyds, 2011).
Reyners, P., ‘Liability problems associated with the current patchwork nuclear liability regime within the EU states’, in Pelzer, N. (ed.), European Nuclear Liability Law in a Process of Change (Baden Baden: Nomos 2009), pp 93–104.
Rhodes, R A W., ‘The new governance: governing without government’, Political Studies XLIV (1996), 652–67.
Richardson, B J., Environmental Regulation Through Financial Organizations: Comparative Perspectives on the Industrialised Nations (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002).
Roberts, P. & Derrick, J., ‘OGUK and AIPN joint operating agreements: differences on operator liability’ (6 June 2011); available at:
Rochette, J., Wemaëre, M., Chabason, L. & Callet, S., ‘Seeing beyond the horizon for deepwater oil and gas: strengthening the international regulation of offshore exploration and exploitation,’ Studies No. 01/14 (Paris: IDDRI); available at:
Roman, A., Fernando, M. & Salsman, K., ‘Canada and international nuclear liability’; available at:
Ronnerberg, N J., ‘An introduction to protection and indemnity clubs and the marine insurance they provide’, University of San Francisco Maritime Law Journal (1990), 1–36.
Røsæg, Erik. ‘The impact of insurance practices on liability conventions’, in Legislative Approaches in Maritime Law: Proceedings from the European Colloquium on Maritime Law: Lysebu, Olso (7–8 December 2000); available at:
Schmidt Etkin, D., ‘Worldwide analysis of marine oil spill clean-up cost factors’, presented at Arctic and Marine Oil Spill Program Technical Seminar (2000); available at:
Schmitt, M., ‘Offshore energy: a reinsurance actuary's view’, presented at CARe, Munich Re (6 and 7 May 2010); available at:
Schmitz, P W., ‘On the joint use of liability and safety regulation’, International Review of Law and Economics 20 (2003), 371–82.
Schwartz, A., ‘Statutory interpretation, capture and tort law: the regulatory compliance defense’, American Law and Economics Review (2000), 1–57.
Schwartz, A., & Wilde, L., ‘Intervening in markets on the basis of imperfect information: a legal and economic analysis’, University of Pittsburgh Law Review (1979), 630–82.
Schwartz, J A., ‘Great expectations: where do we stand with the international nuclear liability conventions?’, in Pelzer, N. (ed.), European Nuclear Liability Law in a Process of Change (Baden Baden: Nomos, 2009), pp 43–67.
Schwarze, R. & Wagner, G., ‘In the aftermath of Dresden: new directions in German flood insurance’, Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance 29 (2004), 154–68.
Scott, C., Cafaggi, F. & Senden, L., ‘The conceptual and constitutional challenge of transnational private regulation’, Journal of Law and Society 38 (2011), 1–19.
Seevers, J S., ‘NOAA's new natural resource damage assessment scheme: it's not about collecting money’, Washington and Lee Law Review (1996), 1513–70.
Shan, H., ‘The era after the Bunker Convention: Is the gap in China's regime for compensating victims of vessel-source oil spills failed’, in Faure, M., Han, L. & Shan, H. (eds.), Marine Pollution Liability and Policy: China, Europe and the US (Alphen a/d Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2010), pp 123–43.
Shavell, S., ‘On moral hazard and insurance’, Quarterly Journal of Economics (1979), 541–62.
Shavell, S., ‘Strict liability versus negligence’, Journal of Legal Studies (1980), 1–25.
Shavell, S., ‘Liability for harm versus regulation of safety’, Journal of Legal Studies (1984), 357–74.
Shavell, S., ‘A model of the optimal use of liability and safety regulation’, Rand Journal of Economics (1984), 271–80.
Shavell, S., ‘Criminal law and the optimal use of non-monetary sanctions as a deterrent’, Colombia Law Review (1985), 1232–62.
Shavell, S., ‘The judgment-proof problem’, International Review of Law and Economics (1986), 43–58.
Shavell, S., Economic Analysis of Accident Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987).
Shover, N., ‘Zelfregulering door ondernemingen; ontwikkeling, beoordeling en bange voorgevoelens’, Tijdschrift voor Criminologie 50 (2008), 169–81.
Skogh, G., ‘The transactions cost theory of insurance: contracting impediments and costs’, Journal of Risk and Insurance (1989), 726–32.
Skogh, G., ‘Risk-sharing institutions for unpredictable losses’, Journal of Theoretical and Institutional Economics 55 (1999), 505–15.
Skogh, G., ‘Mandatory insurance: transaction costs analysis of insurance’, in Bouckaert, B. & Geest, G. De (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, vol. II: Civil Law and Economics (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2000), pp 521–37.
Skogh, G., ‘A European nuclear accident pool’, Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance – Issues and Practice 33 (2008), 274–87.
Slovic, P., Fischoff, B. & Lichtenstein, S., ‘Rating the risks’, in Slovic, P. (ed.), The Perception of Risk (London: Earthscan Publications, 2000).
Smith, B D., State Responsibility and the Marine Environment (Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1988).
Smith, R E., Canelo, E A. & Tidio, A., ‘Reinventing, reinsurance using the capital markets’, Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance (1997), 26–37.
Somers, E., ‘Marine pollution and the right of entry in maritime ports for ships in distress’, in Faure, M G., Han, L. & Shan, H. (eds.), Marine Pollution Liability and Policy: China, Europe and the US (Alphen a/d Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2010), pp 41–53.
State Supervision of Mines (the Netherlands), ‘Staatstoezicht op de Mijnen. Strategie & programma 2012–2016’; available at: porten/2012/06/19/strategie-programma-2012-2016.html.
Stigler, G., ‘The economics of information’, Journal of Political Economics (1961), 213–25.
Sump, D H., ‘The Oil Pollution Act of 1990: a glance in the rearview mirror’, Tulane Law Review (2011), 1101–20.
Tietenberg, T H.Indivisable toxic torts: the economics of joint and several liability’, Land Economics 65 (1989) 305–19.
Tousley, D., ‘Abolishing the “extraordinary nuclear occurrence” threshold of the Price-Anderson Act’, University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (1981), 609–30.
Trebilcock, M J., ‘The social insurance-deterrence dilemma of modern North-American tort law: a Canadian perspective on the liability insurance crisis’, San Diego Law Review 24 (1987), 929–1002.
Trebilcock, M J., & Winter, R A., ‘The economics of nuclear accident law’, International Review of Law and Economics 17 (1997), 215–43.
Tuil, M. & Visscher, L. (eds.), New Trends in Financing Civil Litigation in Europe: A Legal, Empirical and Economic Analysis (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2010).
Tyler, T R. & Thorisdottir, H., ‘A psychological perspective on compensation for harm: examining the 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund’, DePaul Law Review 53 (2003), 355–92.
Tyran, J. & Zweifel, P., ‘Environmental risk internalization through capital markets (ERICAM): the case of nuclear power’, International Review of Law and Economics (1993), 431–44.
United States Coast Guard, ‘Preliminary regulatory impact analysis: financial responsibility for water pollution vessels (1993).
United States General Accounting Office (GAO), ‘Report to congressional committees, nuclear regulation: a perspective on liability protection for nuclear accident’, (1987); available at:
Van den Bergh, R., ‘De maatschappelijke wenselijkheid van gedragscodes vanuit rechtseconomisch perspectief’, WPNR 6772 (2008), 792–8.
Van den Bergh, R., & Faure, M G., ‘Competition on the European market for liability insurance and efficient accident law’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 9 (2002), 279–306.
Vanden Borre, T., ‘Channelling of liability: a few juridical and economic views on an inadequate legal construction’, in Horbach, N L J T. (ed.), Contemporary Developments in Nuclear Energy Law: Harmonizing Legislation in CEEC/NIS (Alphen a/d Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 1999), 13–28.
Vanden Borre, T., ‘Shifts in governance in compensation for nuclear damage: 20 years after Chernobyl’ in Faure, M., and Verheij, A. (eds.), Shifts in Compensation for Environmental Damage (Vienna: Springer, 2007), pp 261–311.
Vanden Borre, T., ‘Nuclear liability: an anachronism in EU energy policy?’ in Roggenkamp, M M. & Hammer, U. (eds.), European Energy Law Report VII (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2010), pp 177–218.
Verheij, A., ‘Shifts in governance: oil pollution’ in Faure, M. & Verheij, A. (eds.), Shifts in Compensation for Environmental Damage (Vienna: Springer, 2007), pp 73–102.
Verjans, E., ‘Nieuwe wettelijke regeling voor de vergoeding van slachtoffers van grote technologische rampen’, Rechtskundig Weekblad 27 (2012–2013), 1076–9.
Viscusi, K. & Zeckhauser, R.Deterring and compensating oil-spill catastrophes: the need for strict and two-tier liability’, Vanderbilt Law Review 64 (2011), 1717–66.
Von Ungern-Sternberg, Th.The limits of competition: housing insurance in Switzerland’, European Economic Review 40 (1996), 1111–21.
Von Ungern-Sternberg, Th. Efficient Monopolies: The Limits of Competition in the European Property Insurance Market (Oxford University Press, 2004).
Vorwerk, A., ‘The 2002 Amendment to the German Atomic Energy Act concerning the phase-out of nuclear power’, Nuclear Law Bulletin 69 (2002), 7–14.
Wagner, F., ‘Risk securitization. An alternative risk transfer of insurance companies’, Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance (1998), 574–607.
Wagner, G., ‘Umwelthaftung und Versicherung’, Versicherungsrecht (1991), 249–60.
Wagner, G., ‘Die Zukunft der Umwelthaftpflichtversicherung’, Versicherungsrecht (1992), 261–72.
Wang, H., ‘Shifts in governments in the international regime of marine oil pollution compensation: a legal history perspective’, in Faure, M. & Verheij, A. (eds.), Shifts in Compensation for Environmental Damage (Vienna: Springer, 2007), pp 197–241.
Wang, H., Civil Liability for Marine Oil Pollution Damage: A Comparative and Economic Study of the International, US and Chinese Compensation Regime (Alphen a/d Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2011).
Wang, H., & Faure, M., ‘Civil liability and compensation for marine pollution: lessons to be learned for offshore oil spills’, Oil, Gas, Energy Law Intelligence 8 (2010), 1–27.
Wilde, M., Civil Liability for Environmental Damage: Comparative Analysis of law and policy in Europe and the US, edn. (Alphen a/d Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2013).
Willis Natural Resources Market Review (April 2015); available at: resources/pdf/naturalresourcesmarketreview2015.pdf.
Wu, C., Pollution from the Carriage of Oil by Sea: Liability and Compensation (Alphen a/d Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 1996).
Zech, J., ‘Will the international capital market replace traditional insurance products?’, Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance (1998), 490–5.
Zeckhauser, R., ‘The economics of catastrophes’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 12 (1996), 113–40.
Zhu, L., ‘International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage, 2001: liability and insurance aspects’, in Basedow, J. & Magnus, U. (eds.), Pollution of the Sea: Prevention and Compensation (Hamburg Studies on Maritime Affairs 10) (Berlin: Springer-Verlag 2007), pp 171–80.