Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T11:58:14.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2022

Sara Wallace Goodman
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Citizenship in Hard Times
How Ordinary People Respond to Democratic Threat
, pp. 201 - 216
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, Alan I., and Saunders, Kyle L.. “Ideological Realignment in the US Electorate.” The Journal of Politics 60, no. 3 (1998): 634–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I., and Webster, Steven. “The Rise of Negative Partisanship and the Nationalization of US Elections in the 21st Century.” Electoral Studies 41 (2016): 1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achen, Christopher H., and Bartels, Larry M.. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Vol. 4. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Adam, Karla, and Booth, William. “Rising Alarm in Britain over Russian Meddling in Brexit Vote.” Washington Post, November 17, 2017.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W., Frenkel-Brunswik, Else, Levinson, Daniel J., and Nevitt Sanford, R.. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Norton, 1950.Google Scholar
Ahlquist, John S., Ichino, Nahomi, Wittenberg, Jason, and Ziblatt, Daniel. “How Do Voters Perceive Changes to the Rules of the Game? Evidence from the 2014 Hungarian Elections.” Journal of Comparative Economics 46, no. 4 (2018): 906–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albertson, Bethany, and Gadarian, Shana Kushner. Anxious Politics: Democratic Citizenship in a Threatening World. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Aldama, Abraham, Vásquez-Cortés, Mateo, and Young, Lauren Elyssa. “Fear and Citizen Coordination against Dictatorship.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 31, no. 1 (2019): 103–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alex-Assensoh, Yvette M. Democracy at Risk: How Political Choices Undermine Citizen Participation and What We Can Do about It. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel, and Verba, Sidney. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altemeyer, Robert A., and Altemeyer, Bob. The Authoritarian Specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Anderson, Christopher J., Blais, Andre, Bowler, Shaun, Donovan, Todd, and Listhaug, Ola. Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Christopher J., and Guillory, Christine A.. “Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems.” American Political Science Review 91, no. 1 (1997): 6681.Google Scholar
Appleby, Jacob, and Federico, Christopher M.. “The Racialization of Electoral Fairness in the 2008 and 2012 United States Presidential Elections.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 21, no. 7 (2018): 979–96.Google Scholar
Bail, Christopher A., Argyle, Lisa P., Brown, Taylor W., et al.Exposure to Opposing Views on Social Media Can Increase Political Polarization.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, no. 37 (2018): 9216–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldassarri, Delia, and Gelman, Andrew. “Partisans without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion.” American Journal of Sociology 114, no. 2 (2008): 408–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barber, Benjamin. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley CA: University of California Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M.Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (1996): 194230.Google Scholar
Benedetto, Giacomo, Hix, Simon, and Mastrorocco, Nicola. “The Rise and Fall of Social Democracy, 1918–2017.” American Political Science Review 114, no. 3 (2020): 928–39.Google Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J.Assuming the Costs of War: Events, Elites, and American Public Support for Military Conflict.” The Journal of Politics 69, no. 4 (2007): 975–97.Google Scholar
Berman, Sheri. Democracy and Dictatorship in Europe: From the Ancien Régime to the Present Day. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Berman, Sheri. The Social Democratic Moment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Berman, Sheri, and Kundnani, Hans. “The Cost of Convergence.” Journal of Democracy 32, no. 1 (2021): 2236.Google Scholar
Berman, Sheri, and Snegovaya, Maria. “Populism and the Decline of Social Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 30, no. 3 (2019): 519.Google Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy. “On Democratic Backsliding.” Journal of Democracy 27, no. 1 (2016): 519.Google Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy Gina. Ordinary People in Extraordinary Times: The Citizenry and the Breakdown of Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Bisgaard, Martin. “How Getting the Facts Right Can Fuel Partisan‐Motivated Reasoning.” American Journal of Political Science 63, no. 4 (2019): 824–39.Google Scholar
Bisgaard, Martin, and Slothuus, Rune. “Partisan Elites as Culprits? How Party Cues Shape Partisan Perceptual Gaps.” American Journal of Political Science 62, no. 2 (2018): 456–69.Google Scholar
Blais, André. To Vote or Not to Vote: The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, André, and Achen, Christopher H.. “Civic Duty and Voter Turnout.” Political Behavior 41, no. 2 (2019): 473–97.Google Scholar
Blais, André, Galais, Carol, and Mayer, Danielle. “Is It a Duty to Vote and to Be Informed?Political Studies Review 17, no. 4 (2019): 328–39.Google Scholar
Bleich, Erik. Race Politics in Britain and France: Ideas and Policymaking since the 1960s. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blinder, Scott, Ford, Robert, and Ivarsflaten, Elisabeth. “Discrimination, Antiprejudice Norms, and Public Support for Multicultural Policies in Europe: The Case of Religious Schools.” Comparative Political Studies 52, no. 8 (2019): 1232–55.Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert. “Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group Position.” Pacific Sociological Review 1, no. 1 (1958): 37.Google Scholar
Bolzendahl, Catherine, and Coffé, Hilde. “Are ‘Good’ Citizens ‘Good’ Participants? Testing Citizenship Norms and Political Participation across 25 Nations.” Political Studies 61 (2013): 4565.Google Scholar
Bonikowski, Bart. “Nationalism in Settled Times.” Annual Review of Sociology 42 (2016): 427–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonikowski, Bart, and DiMaggio, Paul. “Varieties of American Popular Nationalism.” American Sociological Review 81, no. 5 (2016): 949–80.Google Scholar
Bosniak, Linda. The Citizen and the Alien: Dilemmas of Contemporary Membership. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boxell, Levi, Gentzkow, Matthew, and Shapiro, Jesse M. “Cross-Country Trends in Affective Polarization.” NBER Working Paper No. 26669. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2020.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Bush, Sarah Sunn, and Jamal, Amaney A.. “Anti-Americanism, Authoritarian Politics, and Attitudes about Women’s Representation: Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Jordan.” International Studies Quarterly 59, no. 1 (2015): 3445.Google Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto, and Hellwig, Timothy. “Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives under Different Electoral Systems.” American Journal of Political Science 55, no. 1 (2011): 2741.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., et al.The American Voter.” Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip, Miller, Warren E, et al. The American Voter. [in English] Midway Reprints. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Campbell, David E.Civic Engagement and Education: An Empirical Test of the Sorting Model.” American Journal of Political Science 53, no. 4 (2009): 771–86.Google Scholar
Campbell, David E., and Niemi, Richard G.. “Testing Civics: State-Level Civic Education Requirements and Political Knowledge.” American Political Science Review 110, no. 3 (2016): 495511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capoccia, Giovanni. Defending Democracy: Reactions to Extremism in Interwar Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Carsey, Thomas M., and Layman, Geoffrey C.. “Changing Sides or Changing Minds? Party Identification and Policy Preferences in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 50, no. 2 (2006): 464–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Niambi M., and Pérez, Efrén O.. “Race and Nation: How Racial Hierarchy Shapes National Attachments.” Political Psychology 37, no. 4 (2016): 497513.Google Scholar
Carter, Niambi Michele. American While Black: African Americans, Immigration, and the Limits of Citizenship. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavaillé, Charlotte, and Marshall, John. “Education and Anti-Immigration Attitudes: Evidence from Compulsory Schooling Reforms across Western Europe.” American Political Science Review 113, no. 1 (2019): 254–63.Google Scholar
Chou, Winston, Dancygier, Rafaela, Egami, Naoki, et al. “Competing for Loyalists? How Party Positioning Affects Populist Radical Right Voting.” Comparative Political Studies (2021) Online first, https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414021997166.Google Scholar
Claassen, Christopher. “Does Public Support Help Democracy Survive?”. American Journal of Political Science 64, no. 1 (2020): 118–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffé, Hilde, and Bolzendahl, Catherine. “Partisan Cleavages in the Importance of Citizenship Rights and Responsibilities.” Social Science Quarterly 92, no. 3 (2011): 656–74.Google Scholar
Colomer, Josep M. Political Institutions: Democracy and Social Choice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston, Crewe, Ivor M., and Searing, Donald D.. “The Nature of Citizenship in the United States and Great Britain: Empirical Comments on Theoretical Themes.” The Journal of Politics 53, no. 3 (1991): 800–32.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E.The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, edited by Apter, David E., 174. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, 1964.Google Scholar
Corstange, Daniel, and Marinov, Nikolay. “Taking Sides in Other People’s Elections: The Polarizing Effect of Foreign Intervention.” American Journal of Political Science 56, no. 3 (2012): 655–70.Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin. Coping with Post-Democracy. Vol. 598. London: Fabian Society, 2000.Google Scholar
Crozier, Michel, Huntington, Samuel P., and Watanuki, Joji. The Crisis of Democracy. Vol. 70: New York: University Press New York, 1975.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. Pluralist Democracy in the United States: Conflict and Consent. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1967.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A.What Political Institutions Does Large-Scale Democracy Require?”. Political Science Quarterly 120, no. 2 (2005): 187–97.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert Alan. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Los Angeles: CQ Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J.. “Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation.” Political Studies 56, no. 1 (2008): 7698.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J.. Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices. The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies (Comparative Politics). UK: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J.. The Good Citizen : How a Younger Generation Is Reshaping American Politics. [in English] Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J.. The Good Citizen: How a Younger Generation Is Reshaping American Politics. Washington, DC: CQ press, 2021.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J., and Wattenberg, Martin P.. Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J., and Welzel, Christian. The Civic Culture Transformed: From Allegiant to Assertive Citizens. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Dawson, James, and Hanley, Seán. “What’s Wrong with East-Central Europe?: The Fading Mirage of The“ Liberal Consensus”.” Journal of Democracy 27, no. 1 (2016): 2034.Google Scholar
Day, Martin V., Fiske, Susan T., Downing, Emily L., et al.Shifting Liberal and Conservative Attitudes Using Moral Foundations Theory.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 40, no. 12 (2014): 1559–73.Google Scholar
De Vries, , Catherine, E., and Hobolt, Sara B.. Political Entrepreneurs: The Rise of Challenger Parties in Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Doorenspleet, Renske. “Electoral Systems and Good Governance in Divided Countries.” Ethnopolitics 4, no. 4 (2005): 365–80.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. “An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy.” Journal of Political Economy 65, no. 2 (1957): 135–50.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N., Peterson, Erik, and Slothuus, Rune. “How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation.” American Political Science Review (2013): 57–79.Google Scholar
Drutman, Lee. Breaking the Two-Party Doom Loop: The Case for Multiparty Democracy in America. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Easton, David. A Framework for Political Analysis. Vol. 25: Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1965.Google Scholar
Evans, Geoffrey, and Neundorf, Anja. “Core Political Values and the Long-Term Shaping of Partisanship.” British Journal of Political Science (2018): 1–19.Google Scholar
Fieldhouse, Edward, Cutts, David, and Bailey, Jack. “Who Cares If You Vote? Partisan Pressure and Social Norms of Voting.” Political Behavior (2020): 1–20.Google Scholar
Finkel, Eli J., Bail, Christopher A, Cikara, Mina et al.Political Sectarianism in America.” Science 370, no. 6516 (2020): 533–36.Google Scholar
Finkel, Steven E.Can Democracy Be Taught?”. Journal of Democracy 14, no. 4 (2003): 137–51.Google Scholar
Finkel, Steven E.. “Civic Education and the Mobilization of Political Participation in Developing Democracies.” Journal of Politics 64, no. 4 (2002): 9941020.Google Scholar
Finkel, Steven E., and Smith, Amy Erica. “Civic Education, Political Discussion, and the Social Transmission of Democratic Knowledge and Values in a New Democracy: Kenya 2002.” American Journal of Political Science 55, no. 2 (2011): 417–35.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P., and Abrams, Samuel J.. “Political Polarization in the American Public.” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (2008): 563–88.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P., Abrams, Samuel J., and Pope, Jeremy. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. Boston MA: Longman Publishing Group, 2006.Google Scholar
Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, Brendan, and Reifler, Jason. “The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs About Politics.” Political Psychology 38, no. S1 (2017/02/01 2017): 127–50.Google Scholar
Foa, Roberto Stefan, and Mounk, Yascha. “The Signs of Deconsolidation.” Journal of Democracy 28, no. 1 (2017): 515.Google Scholar
Ford, Robert, and Jennings, Will. “The Changing Cleavage Politics of Western Europe.” Annual Review of Political Science 23 (2020): 295314.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy. London, UK: Profile Books, 2014.Google Scholar
Gadarian, Shana Kushner, Goodman, Sara Wallace, and Pepinsky, Thomas B.. “Partisanship, Health Behavior, and Policy Attitudes in the Early Stages of the Covid-19 Pandemic.” PLOS ONE 16, no. 4 (2021): e0249596.Google Scholar
Galston, William A. Anti-Pluralism: The Populist Threat to Liberal Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Garrett, R. Kelly, and Stroud, Natalie Jomini. “Partisan Paths to Exposure Diversity: Differences in Pro-and Counterattitudinal News Consumption.” Journal of Communication 64, no. 4 (2014): 680701.Google Scholar
Gidron, Noam, Adams, James, and Horne, Will. American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective. Elements in American Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Gidron, Noam, Adams, James, and Horne, Will. “How Ideology, Economics and Institutions Shape Affective Polarization in Democratic Polities.” 2018.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, and Huq, Aziz Z.. How to Save a Constitutional Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Goodman, Sara Wallace. “‘Good American Citizens’: A Text-as-Data Analysis of Citizenship Manuals for Immigrants, 1921–1996.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 47, no. 7 (2020): 1474–97.Google Scholar
Goodman, Sara Wallace. Immigration and Membership Politics in Western European. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Goodman, Sara Wallace. “Immigration Threat, Partisanship, and Democratic Citizenship: Evidence from the US, UK, and Germany.” Comparative Political Studies (2021), Online first, https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414021997165Google Scholar
Goodman, Sara Wallace, and Alarian, Hannah M.. “National Belonging and Public Support for Multiculturalism.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics 6, no. 2 (2021): 305–33.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Matthew, and Milazzo, Caitlin. “Taking Back Control? Investigating the Role of Immigration in the 2016 Vote for Brexit.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19, no. 3 (2017): 450–64.Google Scholar
Goren, Paul. “Party Identification and Core Political Values.” American Journal of Political Science 49, no. 4 (2005): 881–96.Google Scholar
Graham, Matthew H., and Svolik, Milan W.. “Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States.” American Political Science Review 114, no. 2 (2020): 392409.Google Scholar
Greene, Steven. “Understanding Party Identification: A Social Identity Approach.” Political Psychology 20, no. 2 (1999): 393403.Google Scholar
Groenendyk, Eric W., and Banks, Antoine J. “Emotional Rescue: How Affect Helps Partisans Overcome Collective Action Problems.” Political Psychology 35, no. 3 (2014/06/01 2014): 359–78.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert. Backsliding: Democratic Regress in the Contemporary World. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Han, Hahrie. “Problems of Power.” Stanford Social Innovation Review Winter (2020): 6.Google Scholar
Harper, Caroline, Kerbaj, Richard, and Wheeler, Tom. “Revealed: The Russia Report.” The Sunday Times, 17 November 2019, www.thetimes.co.uk/article/revealed-the-russia-report-kz6c9mwxf.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J.Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization.” American Political Science Review 95, no. 3 (2001): 619–31.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J.Putting Polarization in Perspective.” British Journal of Political Science 39, no. 2 (2009): 413–48.Google Scholar
Hibbing, John R., and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs About How Government Should Work. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Vol. 25. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Hobolt, Sara B. “The Brexit Vote: A Divided Nation, a Divided Continent.” Journal of European Public Policy 23, no. 9 (2016/10/20 2016): 1259–77.Google Scholar
Hobolt, Sara B., Leeper, Thomas J., and Tilley, James. “Divided by the Vote: Affective Polarization in the Wake of Brexit.” British Journal of Political Science (2020): 1–18.Google Scholar
Hoerner, Julian, and Hobolt, Sara. “Unity in Diversity? Polarization, Issue Diversity and Satisfaction with Democracy.” Journal of European Public Policy 27, no. 12 (2020): 1838–57.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Daniel J., Sides, John, and Citrin, Jack. “The Muted Consequences of Correct Information About Immigration.” The Journal of Politics 81, no. 1 (2019): 315–320.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L.Democracy in Divided Societies.” Journal of Democracy 4, no. 4 (1993): 1838.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L.. Ethnic Groups in Conflict, Updated Edition with a New Preface. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Horton, John. Political Obligation. Basingstoke and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Google Scholar
Howard, Marc Morjé. The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Huber, John, and Inglehart, Ronald. “Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies.” Party Politics 1, no. 1 (1995): 73111.Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie. “From Social to Political Identity: A Critical Examination of Social Identity Theory.” Political Psychology 22, no. 1 (2001): 127–56.Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, Bankert, Alexa, and Davies, Caitlin. “Expressive Versus Instrumental Partisanship in Multiparty European Systems.” Political Psychology 39 (2018): 173–99.Google Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, Mason, Lilliana, and Aarøe, Lene. “Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity.” American Political Science Review 109, no. 1 (2015): 117.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Hur, Aram. “Is There an Intrinsic Duty to Vote? Comparative Evidence from East and West Germans.” Electoral Studies 45 (2017): 5562.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. “Trump and the Populist Authoritarian Parties: The Silent Revolution in Reverse.” Perspectives on Politics 15, no. 2 (2017): 443–54.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. “Information, Inequality, and Mass Polarization: Ideology in Advanced Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 48, no. 13 (2015): 1781–813.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Lelkes, Yphtach, Levendusky, Matthew, Malhotra, Neil, and Westwood, Sean J.. “The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States.” Annual Review of Political Science 22 (2019): 129–46.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Sood, Gaurav, and Lelkes, Yphtach. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76, no. 3 (2012): 405–31.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, and Westwood, Sean J. “Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59, no. 3 (2015): 690707.Google Scholar
Janoski, Thomas. Citizenship and Civil Society: A Framework of Rights and Obligations in Liberal, Traditional, and Social Democratic Regimes. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent. “Political Knowledge over Time and across Generations.” Public Opinion Quarterly 60, no. 2 (1996): 228–52.Google Scholar
Johnston, Richard. “Party Identification: Unmoved Mover or Sum of Preferences?”. Annual Review of Political Science 9 (2006): 329–51.Google Scholar
Karp, Jeffrey A., and Banducci, Susan A.. “Political Efficacy and Participation in Twenty-Seven Democracies: How Electoral Systems Shape Political Behaviour.” British Journal of Political Science 38, no. 2 (2008): 311–34.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Robert R., and Haggard, Stephan. “Democratic Decline in the United States: What Can We Learn from Middle-Income Backsliding?”. Perspectives on Politics 17, no. 2 (2019): 417–32.Google Scholar
Klar, Samara, and Krupnikov, Yanna. Independent Politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Klar, Samara, Krupnikov, Yanna, and Ryan, John Barry. “Affective Polarization or Partisan Disdain?: Untangling a Dislike for the Opposing Party from a Dislike of Partisanship.” Public Opinion Quarterly 82, no. 2 (2018): 379–90.Google Scholar
Klüver, Heike, and Spoon, Jae-Jae. “Helping or Hurting? How Governing as a Junior Coalition Partner Influences Electoral Outcomes.” The Journal of Politics 82, no. 4 (2020): 1231–42.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. “Restructuration of Partisan Politics and the Emergence of a New Cleavage Based on Values.” West European Politics 33, no. 3 (2010): 673–85.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Grande, Edgar, Lachat, Romain, et al. West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter, Koopmans, Ruud, Duyvendak, Jan Willem, et al. New Social Movements in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. London, UK: University College London Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Laakso, Markku, and Taagepera, Rein. ““Effective” Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12, no. 1 (1979): 327.Google Scholar
Lajevardi, Nazita, and Abrajano, Marisa. “How Negative Sentiment toward Muslim Americans Predicts Support for Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election.” The Journal of Politics 81, no. 1 (2019/01/01 2018): 296302.Google Scholar
Lane, Robert E.The Tense Citizen and the Casual Patriot: Role Confusion in American Politics.” The Journal of Politics 27, no. 4 (1965): 735–60.Google Scholar
Langton, Kenneth P., and Kent Jennings, M.. “Political Socialization and the High School Civics Curriculum in the United States.” American Political Science Review 62, no. 3 (1968): 852–67.Google Scholar
Larry, Diamond. The Spirit of Democracy: The Struggle to Build Free Societies Throughout the World. New York, NY: Times Books/Henry Holt and Co, 2008.Google Scholar
Lassen, David Dreyer. “The Effect of Information on Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” American Journal of Political Science 49, no. 1 (2005): 103–18.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard, and Redlawsk, David. How Voters Decide: Information Processing During Election Campaigns. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Lavine, Howard G., Johnston, Christopher D., and Steenbergen, Marco R.. The Ambivalent Partisan: How Critical Loyalty Promotes Democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
LeBas, Adrienne. “Can Polarization Be Positive? Conflict and Institutional Development in Africa.” American Behavioral Scientist 62, no. 1 (2018/01/01 2018): 5974.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E. Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the US Senate. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E.. “How Party Polarization Affects Governance.” Annual Review of Political Science 18 (2015): 261–82.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E.. Insecure Majorities: Congress and the Perpetual Campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Lenz, Gabriel S. Follow the Leader?: How Voters Respond to Politicians’ Policies and Performance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew. How Partisan Media Polarize America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew S.Americans, Not Partisans: Can Priming American National Identity Reduce Affective Polarization?”. The Journal of Politics 80, no. 1 (2018): 5970.Google Scholar
Levin, Dov H.A Vote for Freedom? The Effects of Partisan Electoral Interventions on Regime Type.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 63, no. 4 (2019): 839–68.Google Scholar
Levin, Dov H.. “When the Great Power Gets a Vote: The Effects of Great Power Electoral Interventions on Election Results.” International Studies Quarterly 60, no. 2 (2016): 189202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Ziblatt, Daniel. How Democracies Die. New York, NY: Crown, 2018.Google Scholar
Lewis, John. “Together, You Can Redeem the Soul of Our Nation.” The New York Times, July 30, 2020.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. The Politics of Accommodation; Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands . [in English] Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. “Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dilemma Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1996.” American Political Science Review 91, no. 1 (1997): 114.Google Scholar
Lin, Winston. “Agnostic Notes on Regression Adjustments to Experimental Data: Reexamining Freedman’s Critique.” The Annals of Applied Statistics 7, no. 1 (2013): 295318.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J. Crisis, Breakdown and Reequilibration. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J.. “The Perils of Presidentialism.” Journal of Democracy 1, no. 1 (1990): 5169.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J., and Stepan, Alfred C.. “Toward Consolidated Democracies.” Journal of Democracy 7, no. 2 (1996): 1433.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan José, and Stepan, Alfred C. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. “Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics.” Doubleday & Co., 1959.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Rokkan, Stein, eds. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. Vol. 7. New York, NY: Free Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Lodge, Milton, and Taber, Charles S. The Rationalizing Voter. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D., and Arthur, Lupia. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know?. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Lupu, Noam. “Party Polarization and Mass Partisanship: A Comparative Perspective.” Political Behavior 37, no. 2 (2015/06/01 2015): 331–56.Google Scholar
Macedo, Stephen. Diversity and Distrust: Civic Education in a Multicultural Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
MacKuen, Michael, Wolak, Jennifer, Keele, Luke, et al.Civic Engagements: Resolute Partisanship or Reflective Deliberation.” American Journal of Political Science 54, no. 2 (2010): 440–58.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Malka, Ariel, Lelkes, Yphtach, Bakker, Bert N., et al. “Who Is Open to Authoritarian Governance within Western Democracies?”. Perspectives on Politics (2020), doi:10.1017/S1537592720002091.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E., Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth, Sullivan, John L., et al. With Malice toward Some: How People Make Civil Liberties Judgments. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Marshall, Thomas. Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Mason, Lilliana. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2018.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2016.Google Scholar
McCoy, Jennifer, Rahman, Tahmina, and Somer, Murat. “Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy: Common Patterns, Dynamics, and Pernicious Consequences for Democratic Polities.” American Behavioral Scientist 62, no. 1 (2018): 1642.Google Scholar
McCoy, Jennifer, and Somer, Murat. “Toward a Theory of Pernicious Polarization and How It Harms Democracies: Comparative Evidence and Possible Remedies.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681, no. 1 (2019): 234–71.Google Scholar
Mechkova, Valeriya, Lührmann, Anna, and Lindberg, Staffan I.. “How Much Democratic Backsliding?”. Journal of Democracy 28, no. 4 (2017): 162–69.Google Scholar
Merolla, Jennifer L., and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. “Threat and Information Acquisition: Evidence from an Eight Country Study.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 5, no. 3 (2018): 167–81.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. Collected Works. Toronto, CA: University of Toronto Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Miller, David. “Immigrants, Nations, and Citizenship.” Journal of Political Philosophy 16, no. 4 (2008): 371–90.Google Scholar
Miller, Michael K.A Republic, If You Can Keep It: Breakdown and Erosion in Modern Democracies.” The Journal of Politics 83, no. 1 (2021): 198–213.Google Scholar
Miller, Steven V. “Economic Threats or Societal Turmoil? Understanding Preferences for Authoritarian Political Systems.” Political Behavior 39, no. 2 (2017/06/01 2017): 457–78.Google Scholar
Milner, Henry. Civic Literacy: How Informed Citizens Make Democracy Work. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 2002.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J.Public Opinion and Heuristic Processing of Source Cues.” Political Behavior 15, no. 2 (1993): 167–92.Google Scholar
Mounk, Yascha. The People Vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge, UK: University Press Cambridge, 2007.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana C.Status Threat, Not Economic Hardship, Explains the 2016 Presidential Vote.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, no. 19 (2018): E4330–E39.Google Scholar
Nelsen, Matthew D.Cultivating Youth Engagement: Race & the Behavioral Effects of Critical Pedagogy.” Political Behavior 43, no.2 (2021): 134.Google Scholar
Nelsen, Matthew D.. “Teaching Citizenship: Race and the Behavioral Effects of American Civic Education.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics 6, no. 1 (2021): 157–86.Google Scholar
Nelson, Thomas E., Oxley, Zoe M., and Clawson, Rosalee A.. “Toward a Psychology of Framing Effects.” Political Behavior 19, no. 3 (1997): 221–46.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. “Global Party Survey, 2019.” Harvard Dataverse, 2020, www.globalpartysurvey.org/.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. “It Happened in America.” Foreign Affairs (2021).Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. Why Electoral Integrity Matters. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa, Cameron, Sarah, and Wynter, Thomas. Electoral Integrity in America: Securing Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa, and Inglehart, Ronald. Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Orenstein, Mitchell Alexander. Out of the Red: Building Capitalism and Democracy in Postcommunist Europe. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Pearlman, Wendy. “Narratives of Fear in Syria.” Perspectives on Politics 14, no. 1 (2016): 2137.Google Scholar
Pepinsky, Thomas. “Why the Impeachment Fight Is Even Scarier Than You Think.” Politico, October 31, 2019. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/10/31/regime-cleavage-229895/.Google Scholar
Pepinsky, Thomas B. Economic Crises and the Breakdown of Authoritarian Regimes: Indonesia and Malaysia in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Persson, Mikael. “Education and Political Participation.” British Journal of Political Science 45, no. 3 (2015): 689703.Google Scholar
Petersen, Michael Bang, Skov, Martin, Serritzlew, Søren, et al.Motivated Reasoning and Political Parties: Evidence for Increased Processing in the Face of Party Cues.” Political Behavior 35, no. 4 (2013): 831–54.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard L.. Ideology and Congress: New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 2007.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl. The Open Society and Its Enemies. London, UK: Routledge, 1945.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham. “American Voter Turnout in Comparative Perspective.” American Political Science Review 80, no. 1 (1986): 1743.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham, and Powell Jr, G. Bingham. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. Capitalism and Social Democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. Crises of Democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. Bowling Alone, : The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster, 2000.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. Bowling Alone, . Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Quillian, Lincoln. “Prejudice as a Response to Perceived Group Threat: Population Composition and Anti-Immigrant and Racial Prejudice in Europe.” American Sociological Review 60, no. 4 (1995): 586611.Google Scholar
Rabushka, Alvin, and Shepsle, Kenneth A. Politics in Plural Societies. New York, NY: Pearson, 2009.Google Scholar
Rahn, Wendy M. “The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing About Political Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science (1993): 472–96.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Redlawsk, David P.Hot Cognition or Cool Consideration? Testing the Effects of Motivated Reasoning on Political Decision Making.” The Journal of Politics 64, no. 4 (2002): 1021–44.Google Scholar
Reiljan, Andres. “‘Fear and Loathing across Party Lines’ (Also) in Europe: Affective Polarisation in European Party Systems.” European Journal of Political Research 59, no. 2 (2020): 376–96.Google Scholar
Reny, Tyler T., Collingwood, Loren, and Valenzuela, Ali A.. “Vote Switching in the 2016 Election: How Racial and Immigration Attitudes, Not Economics, Explain Shifts in White Voting.” Public Opinion Quarterly 83, no. 1 (2019): 91113.Google Scholar
Riker, William H., and Ordeshook, Peter C.. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” The American Political Science Review 62, no. 1 (1968): 2542.Google Scholar
Rokeach, Milton. The Open and Closed Mind. New York, NY: Basic Books, 1960.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, Nancy L. On the Side of the Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Runciman, David. How Democracy Ends. London, UK: Profile Books, 2018.Google Scholar
Rustow, Dankwart A.Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model.” Comparative Politics 2, no. 3 (1970): 337–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Satherley, Nicole, Yogeeswaran, Kumar, Osborne, Danny, and Sibley, Chris G.. “If They Say “Yes,” We Say “No”: Partisan Cues Increase Polarization over National Symbols.” Psychological Science 29, no. 12 (2018): 19962009.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, Elmer Eric. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1960.Google Scholar
Schildkraut, Deborah J. Press “One” For English: Language Policy, Public Opinion, and American Identity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers, 1942.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Sedelmeier, Ulrich. “Anchoring Democracy from Above? The European Union and Democratic Backsliding in Hungary and Romania after Accession.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 52, no. 1 (2014): 105–21.Google Scholar
Shulman, Stephen, and Bloom, Stephen. “The Legitimacy of Foreign Intervention in Elections: The Ukrainian Response.” Review of International Studies 38, no. 2 (2012): 445–71.Google Scholar
Sides, John, Tesler, Michael, and Vavreck, Lynn. Identity Crisis: The 2016 Presidential Campaign and the Battle for the Meaning of America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Skitka, Linda J., Bauman, Christopher W., and Sargis, Edward G.. “Moral Conviction: Another Contributor to Attitude Strength or Something More?”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88, no. 6 (2005): 895.Google Scholar
Slater, Dan. “Democratic Careening.” World Politics 65, no. 4 (2013): 729–63.Google Scholar
Slothuus, Rune, and De Vreese, Claes H.. “Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Issue Framing Effects.” The Journal of Politics 72, no. 3 (2010): 630–45.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. Civic Ideals: Conflicting Visions of Citizenship in US History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Sobolewska, Maria, and Ford, Robert. Brexitland: Identity, Diversity and the Reshaping of British Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Sobolewska, Maria, Galandini, Silvia, and Lessard-Phillips, Laurence. “The Public View of Immigrant Integration: Multidimensional and Consensual. Evidence from Survey Experiments in the UK and the Netherlands.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 43, no. 1 (2017): 5879.Google Scholar
Spiro, Peter J. Citizenship: What Everyone Needs to Know. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Spoon, Jae-Jae, and Klüver, Heike. “Responding to Far Right Challengers: Does Accommodation Pay Off?”. Journal of European Public Policy 27, no. 2 (2020): 273–91.Google Scholar
Spoon, Jae-Jae, and Williams, Christopher J.. “‘It’s the Economy, Stupid’: When New Politics Parties Take on Old Politics Issues.” West European Politics 44, no. 4 (2020): 802–24.Google Scholar
Spoon, Jae‐Jae, and Klüver, Heike. “Party Convergence and Vote Switching: Explaining Mainstream Party Decline across Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 58, no. 4 (2019): 1021–42.Google Scholar
Stokes, Donald E.Spatial Models of Party Competition.” The American Political Science Review 57, no. 2 (1963): 368–77.Google Scholar
Sullivan, John L., Piereson, James, and Marcus, George E.. Political Tolerance and American Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Svolik, Milan W.Polarization Versus Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 30, no. 3 (2019): 2032.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri, Billig, Michael G., Bundy, Robert P., and Flament, Claude. “Social Categorization and Intergroup Behaviour.” European Journal of Social Psychology 1, no. 2 (1971): 149–78.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri, and Turner, John C.. “An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations 33, no. 47(1979): 74.Google Scholar
Tesler, Michael. “The Return of Old-Fashioned Racism to White Americans’ Partisan Preferences in the Early Obama Era.” The Journal of Politics 75, no. 1 (2012): 110–23.Google Scholar
Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. Who Counts as an American? : The Boundaries of National Identity. [in English] Cambridge UK, New York NY: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. “Citizenship, Identity and Social History.” International Review of Social History 40, no. S3 (1995): 117.Google Scholar
Tomz, Michael, and Weeks, Jessica L. P.. “Public Opinion and Foreign Electoral Intervention.” American Political Science Review (2020): 1–18.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Turner, John, and Tajfel, Henri. Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Vachudova, Milada. “Ethnopopulism and Democratic Backsliding in Central Europe.” East European Politics 36, no. 3 (2020): 318–40.Google Scholar
Vachudova, Milada. Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage, and Integration after Communism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press , 2005.Google Scholar
Vachudova, Milada. “From Competition to Polarization in Central Europe: How Populists Change Party Systems and the European Union.” Polity 51, no. 4 (2019): 689706.Google Scholar
Valentino, Nicholas A., Hutchings, Vincent L., Banks, Antoine J., et al.Is a Worried Citizen a Good Citizen? Emotions, Political Information Seeking, and Learning Via the Internet.” Political Psychology 29, no. 2 (2008): 247–73.Google Scholar
der Meer, Van, Tom, W. G., Van Deth, Jan W., et al.The Politicized Participant: Ideology and Political Action in 20 Democracies.” Comparative Political Studies 42, no. 11 (2009): 1426–57.Google Scholar
Vasilopoulos, Pavlos. “Terrorist Events, Emotional Reactions, and Political Participation: The 2015 Paris Attacks.” West European Politics 41, no. 1 (2018): 102–27.Google Scholar
Waldner, David, and Lust, Ellen. “Unwelcome Change: Coming to Terms with Democratic Backsliding.” Annual Review of Political Science 21 (2018): 93113.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. Obligations: Essays on Disobedience, War, and Citizenship. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Wan, Amy J. Producing Good Citizens: Literacy Training in Anxious Times. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Wattenberg, Martin P. Where Have All the Voters Gone? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Watts, Jake, and Bale, Tim. “Populism as an Intra-Party Phenomenon: The British Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 21, no. 1 (2019): 99115.Google Scholar
Webster, Steven W., and Abramowitz, Alan I.. “The Ideological Foundations of Affective Polarization in the US Electorate.” American Politics Research 45, no. 4 (2017): 621–47.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry R.The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law.” American Political Science Review 91, no. 2 (1997): 245–63.Google Scholar
Wellman, Elizabeth Iams, Hyde, Susan D., and Hall, Thad E.. “Does Fraud Trump Partisanship? The Impact of Contentious Elections on Voter Confidence.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 28, no. 3 (2018): 330–48.Google Scholar
Welzel, Christian. Freedom Rising. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Welzel, Christian, and Inglehart, Ronald. “The Role of Ordinary People in Democratization.” Journal of Democracy 19, no. 1 (2008): 126–40.Google Scholar
Westwood, Sean J., Iyengar, Shanto, Walgrave, Stefaan, et al.The Tie That Divides: Cross‐National Evidence of the Primacy of Partyism.” European Journal of Political Research 57, no. 2 (2018): 333–54.Google Scholar
Whiteley, Paul. “Does Citizenship Education Work? Evidence from a Decade of Citizenship Education in Secondary Schools in England.” Parliamentary Affairs 67, no. 3 (2012): 513–35.Google Scholar
Whiteley, Paul, Poletti, Monica, Webb, Paul, and Bale, Tim. “Oh Jeremy Corbyn! Why Did Labour Party Membership Soar after the 2015 General Election?”. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 21, no. 1 (2019): 8098.Google Scholar
Wilson, David C., and Brewer, Paul R.. “The Foundations of Public Opinion on Voter ID Laws: Political Predispositions, Racial Resentment, and Information Effects.” Public Opinion Quarterly 77, no. 4 (2013): 962–84.Google Scholar
Wright, Matthew. “Diversity and the Imagined Community: Immigrant Diversity and Conceptions of National Identity.” Political Psychology 32, no. 5 (2011): 837–62.Google Scholar
Wright, Matthew. “Policy Regimes and Normative Conceptions of Nationalism in Mass Public Opinion.” Comparative Political Studies 44, no. 5 (2011): 598624.Google Scholar
Wright, Matthew, Citrin, Jack, and Wand, Jonathan. “Alternative Measures of American National Identity: Implications for the Civic‐Ethnic Distinction.” Political Psychology 33, no. 4 (2012): 469–82.Google Scholar
Ypi, Lea. “Political Commitment and the Value of Partisanship.” American Political Science Review 110, no. 3 (2016): 601–13.Google Scholar
Zaller, John. The Nature and Origin of Public Opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Zaller, John. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Ziblatt, Daniel. Conservative Political Parties and the Birth of Modern Democracy in Europe. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Sara Wallace Goodman, University of California, Irvine
  • Book: Citizenship in Hard Times
  • Online publication: 22 January 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009058292.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Sara Wallace Goodman, University of California, Irvine
  • Book: Citizenship in Hard Times
  • Online publication: 22 January 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009058292.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Sara Wallace Goodman, University of California, Irvine
  • Book: Citizenship in Hard Times
  • Online publication: 22 January 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009058292.011
Available formats
×