Aalders, G. J. D. 1969. ‘ΝΟΜΟΣ ΕΜΨΥΧΟΣ’, in Steinmetz, P. (ed.), Politeia und Res Publica: Beiträge zum Verständnis von Politik, Recht und Staat in der Antike. Wiesbaden: Steiner, pp. 315–19.Google Scholar

Aalders, G. J. D. 1975. Political Thought in Hellenistic Times. Amsterdam: Hakkert.Google Scholar

Addey, C. 2014. Divination and Theurgy in Neoplatonism: Oracles of the Gods. Farnham; Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Agamben, G. 1995. Homo sacer. Il potere sovrano e la nuda vita. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar

Agosti, G. 2001. ‘Late Antique Iambics and Iambiké Idea’, in Cavarzere, A., Aloni, A., and Barchiesi, A. (eds.), Iambic Ideas: Essays to a Poetic Tradition from Archaic Greece to the Late Roman Empire. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 219–51.Google Scholar

Ahl, F. 1984. ‘The Art of Safe Criticism in Greece and Rome’, American Journal of Philology 105: 174–208.Google Scholar

Akçai, K. N. 2019. Porphyry’s On the Cave of the Nymphs in Its Intellectual Context. Leiden; Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alföldi, A. 1948. The Conversion of Constantine and Pagan Rome. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Alföldi, A. 1968. ‘Die verlorene enmannsche Kaisergeschichte und die Caesares des Julianus Apostata’, Bonner Historia-Augusta Colloquium 4: 1–8.Google Scholar

Alföldy, G. 1974. ‘Crisis of the Third Century as Seen by Contemporaries’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 15: 89–111.Google Scholar

Allen, P., and Mayer, W.. 1999. John Chrysostom. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Alvino, M. C. 2019. Lo specchio del principe. L’ideologia imperiale a Costantinopoli tra IV e VI secolo d.C. Naples: Satura editrice.Google Scholar

Ando, C. 2012. Imperial Rome AD 193 to 284: The Critical Century. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Antonova, S. E. 2018. Barbarian or Greek? The Charge of Barbarism and Early Christian Apologetics. Leiden; Boston: Brill.Google Scholar

Asad, T. 1993. Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore; London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Asmus, R. 1900. ‘Synesius und Dio Chrysostomus’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 9: 85–151.Google Scholar

Asmus, R. 1914. ‘Review of Geffcken 1914’, Wochenschrift für klassische Philologie 31: 515–25.Google Scholar

Asper, M. 2016. ‘Distinctive Readings: Callimachus and Roman Knights’, Philologia Antiqua 9: 21–32.Google Scholar

Atack, C. 2015. ‘Aristotle’s Pambasileia and the Metaphysics of Monarchy’, Polis 32: 297–320.Google Scholar

Athanassiadi, P. 1977. ‘A Contribution to Mithraic Theology: The Emperor Julian’s Hymn to King Helios’, Journal of Theological Studies 28: 360–71.Google Scholar

Athanassiadi, P. 1981. Julian and Hellenism: An Intellectual Biography. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Athanassiadi, P., and Frede, M. (eds.) 1999. Pagan Monotheism in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Badham, C. 1855. Platonis Philebus. London: J.W. Parker.Google Scholar

Baker-Brian, N. 2020. ‘“I have taken pains to get copies of them” (Athanasius, De Synodis 55): Epistolary Relations between the Sons of Constantine and the Christian Church’, in Baker-Brian, and Tougher, (eds.), pp. 347–87.Google Scholar

Baker-Brian, N., and Tougher, S. (eds.) 2012. Emperor and Author: The Writings of Julian the Apostate. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar

Baker-Brian, N., and Tougher, S. 2020. The Sons of Constantine, A.D. 337–361: In the Shadows of Constantine and Julian. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldi, I. 2012. Gli Inni di Sinesio di Cirene: vicende testuali di un corpus tardoantico. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Baldwin, B. 1978. ‘The Caesares of Julian’, Klio 40: 449–66.Google Scholar

Ballériaux, O. 1994. ‘Themistius et le néoplatonisme. Le Nous pathêtikos et l’immortalité de l’âme’, Revue de Philosophie Ancienne 12: 171–200.Google Scholar

Balot, R. K. 2004. ‘Free Speech, Courage and Democratic Deliberation’ in Sluiter, I. and Rosen, R. M. (eds.), Free Speech in Classical Antiquity. Leiden; Boston: Brill, pp. 232–59.Google Scholar

Barbagli, N. 2019. ‘Il perdono degli Alessandrini. Fortuna di un episodio di clemenza imperiale’, in Cecconi, G. A., Lizzi Testa, R., and Marcone, A. (eds.), The Past as Present: Essays on Roman History in Honour of Guido Clemente. Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 43–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barbagli, N. 2020. ‘The Emperors in the Province: A Study of the Tetrarchic Images from the Imperial Cult Chamber in Luxor’, in Guidetti, F. and Meinecke, K. (eds.), A Globalized Visual Culture? Towards a Geography of Late Antique Art. Oxford; Havertown: Oxbow Books, pp. 91–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barbero, A. 2006. Barbari. Immigrati, profughi, deportati nell’impero romano. Rome: Laterza.Google Scholar

Barbero, A. 2016. Costantino il vincitore. Rome: Salerno editrice.Google Scholar

Barceló, P. A. 2004. Constantius II. und seine Zeit: die Anfänge des Staatskirchentums. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar

Bardill, J. 2012. Constantine, Divine Emperor of the Christian Golden Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bardy, J. 1949. ‘Philosophie et philosophe dans le vocabulaire chrétien des premiers siècles’, Révue d’Ascétique et de Mystique 25: 97–108.Google Scholar

Barker, A. 2015. Porphyry’s Commentary on Ptolemy’s Harmonics: A Greek Text and Annotated translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D. 1975. ‘Publilius Optatianus Porfyrius’, American Journal of Philology 96: 173–86.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D. 1976. ‘The Emperor Constantine’s Good Friday Sermon’, Journal of Theological Studies 27: 414–23.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D. 1978. ‘Emperor and Bishops, A.D. 324–44: Some Problems’, American Journal of Ancient History 3: 53–75.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D. 1981. Constantine and Eusebius. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D. 1984. ‘Constantine’s Prohibition of Pagan Sacrifice’, American Journal of Philology 105: 69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, T. D. 1986a. ‘Synesius in Constantinople’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 27: 93–112.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D. 1986b. ‘When Did Synesius Become Bishop of Ptolemais?’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 27: 325–29.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D. 1993. Athanasius and Constantius. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D. 1998. Ammianus and the Representation of Historical Reality. Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D. 2001. ‘Constantine’s Speech to the Assembly of the Saints: Place and Date of Delivery’, Journal of Theological Studies 52: 26–36.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D. 2008. ‘Aspects of the Severan Empire, Part I: Severus as a New Augustus’, New England Classical Journal 35: 251–67.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D. 2011. Constantine: Dynasty, Religion, and Power in the Later Roman Empire. Chichester: Wiley–Blackwell.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D., and Vanderspoel, J.. 1981. ‘Julian and Themistius’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 22: 187–89.Google Scholar

Bartelink, G. M. 1970. Quelques observations sur παρρησία dans la littérature paléo-chrétienne. Nijmegen: Dekker & van de Vegt.Google Scholar

Bartelink, G. M. 1997. ‘Die Parrhesia des Menschen vor Gott bei Johannes Chrysostomus’, Vigiliae Christianae 51: 261–72Google Scholar

Bassett, S. 2004. The Urban Image of Late Antique Constantinople. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bausi, A., Reudenback, B., and Wimmer, H. (eds.) 2020. Canones: The Art of Harmony: The Canon Tables of the Four Gospels. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Baynes, N. H. 1929. Constantine the Great and the Christian Church. London: Humphrey Milford.Google Scholar

Baynes, N. H. 1955. ‘The Thought-World of East Rome’, in Byzantine Studies and Other Essays. London: Historical Association, pp. 24–46.Google Scholar

Beard, M. 1986. ‘Cicero and Divination: The Formation of a Latin Discourse’, Journal of Roman Studies 76: 33–46.Google Scholar

Beard, M. 2014. Laughter in Ancient Rome: On Joking, Tickling, and Cracking Up. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Beckwith, C. L. 2005. ‘The Condemnation and Exile of Hilary of Poitiers at the Synod of Béziers (356 C.E.)’, Journal of Early Christian Studies 13: 21–38.Google Scholar

Benedict, J. L. 2018. ‘Truth to Power: The Politics of Theological Free Speech in the Cappadocian Fathers and Augustine of Hippo’. Diss. Duke University.Google Scholar

Béranger, J. 1948. ‘Le réfus du pouvoir’, Museum Helveticum 5: 178–96.Google Scholar

Bergmann, M. 1998. Die Strahlen der Heerscher. Theomorphes Herrscherbild und politische Symbolik im Hellenismus und in der römischen Kaiserzeit. Mainz am Rhein: von Zabern.Google Scholar

Bidez, J. 1930. La vie de l’Empereur Julien. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Bidez, J. 1932. L’empereur Julien. Œuvres complètes, I.1 Discours de Julien César. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Bidez, J., and Cumont, F.. 1922. Iuliani imperatoris Epistulae Leges Poematia Fragmenta varia. Paris; Oxford: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Bleckmann, B. 1994. ‘Constantina, Vetranio, und Gallus Caesar’, Chiron 24: 29–68.Google Scholar

Bleckmann, B. 1997. ‘Ein Kaiser als Prediger: zur Datierung der konstantinischen Rede an die Versammlung der Heligen’, Hermes 125: 183–202.Google Scholar

Bleckmann, B. 1999. ‘Die Schlacht von Mursa und die zeitgenössische Deutung eines spätantiken Bürgerkrieges’, in Brandt, H. (ed.), Gedeutete Realität. Krisen, Wirklichkeiten, Interpretationen (3.–6. Jh. N. Chr.). Stuttgart: Steiner, pp. 47–102.Google Scholar

Bleckmann, B. 2012. ‘Sources for the History of Constantine’, in Lenski, (ed.), pp. 14–32.Google Scholar

Bleckmann, B. 2020. ‘From Caesar to Augustus: Julian against Constantius’, in Rebenich, and Wiemer, (eds.), pp. 97–123.Google Scholar

Blockley, R. C. 1981. The Fragmentary Classicising Historians of the Later Roman Empire: Eunapius, Olympiodorus, Priscus and Malchus. Liverpool: Cairns.Google Scholar

Blockley, R. C. 1983. The Fragmentary Classicising Historians of the Later Roman Empire: Eunapius, Olympiodorus, Priscus and Malchus. Vol. 2: Text, Translation and Historiographical Notes. Liverpool: Cairns.Google Scholar

Borrelli, D. 2003. ‘Il sacerdos del De Mysteriis e il sacerdos di Giuliano’, in Criscuolo, U. (ed.), Da Costantino a Teodosio il Grande. Cultura, Società, Diritto. Naples: D’Auria, pp. 105–17.Google Scholar

Borrelli, D. 2018. ‘Identità e funzioni dello hiereus nel ‘religious revival’ di Massimino Daia e Giuliano imperatore’, in Dainese, D. and Gheller, V. (eds.), Beyond Intolerance: The Milan Meeting in AD 313 and the Evolution of the Imperial Religious Policy from the Age of the Tetrarchs to Julian the Apostate. Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 67–104.Google Scholar

Bosworth, B. 1999. ‘Augustus, the Res Gestae, and Hellenistic Theories of Apotheosis’, Journal of Roman Studies 89: 1–18.Google Scholar

Bouffartigue, J. 1992. L’Empereur Julien et la culture de son temps. Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes.Google Scholar

Bouffartigue, J. 2004. ‘Philosophie et antichristianisme chez l’empereur Julian’, in Narcy, M. and Rebillard, É. (eds.), Hellénisme et Christianisme. Lille: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion, pp. 111–31.Google Scholar

Bouffartigue, J. 2005. ‘La lettre de Julien à Themistius: Histoire d’une fausse manœuvre et d’un désaccord essentiel’, in González Gálvez, Á. and Malosse, P.-L. (eds.), Mélanges A.F. Norman. Lyon: Maison de l’Orient méditerranéen, pp. 113–38.Google Scholar

Boulnois, M.-O. 2020. ‘Le prologue de l’évangile de Jean au cœur de la polémique entre l’empereur Julien et Cyrille d’Alexandrie’, in Huber-Rebenich, G. and Rebenich, S. (eds.), Interreligiöse Konflikte im 4. Und 5. Jahrhundert. Julian Contra Gailaeos-Kyrill Contra Iulianum. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 195–227.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. 1986. ‘The Forms of Capital’, in Richardson, J. G. (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press, pp. 241–58.Google Scholar

Boyarin, D. 2004. Border Lines: The Partition of Judaeo-Christianity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Boyarin, D. 2010. ‘Origen as Theorist of Allegory: Alexandrian Contexts’, in Copeland, and Struck, (eds.), pp. 39–54.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. 2001. Post-Hellenistic Philosophy: A Study of Its Development from The Stoics to Origen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. (ed.) 2003. Metaphor, Allegory, and the Classical Tradition: Ancient Thought and Modern Revisions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. R. 2016. ‘Providence and Religion in Middle Platonism’, in Eidinow, E., Kindt, J. and Osborne, R. (eds.), Theologies of ancient Greek religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 317–38.Google Scholar

Bowen, A., and Garnsey, P.. 2003. Lactantius: Divine Institutes. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar

Bowersock, G. W. 1978. Julian the Apostate. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Bowersock, G. W. 1982. ‘The Emperor Julian on His Predecessor’, Yale Classical Studies 27: 159–72.Google Scholar

Bowman, A. 2005. ‘Diocletian and the first Tetrarchy, A.D. 284–305’, Cambridge Ancient History XII: 67–88.Google Scholar

Bradbury, S. 1987. ‘The Date of Julian’s Letter to Themistius’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 28: 235–52.Google Scholar

Bradbury, S. 1994. ‘Constantine and the Problem of Anti-Pagan Legislation in the Fourth Century’, Classical Philology 89: 120–39.Google Scholar

Bradbury, S. 2020. ‘Julian and the Jews’, in Rebenich, and Wiemer, (eds.), pp. 267–92.Google Scholar

Brakke, D. 1995. Athanasius and the Politics of Asceticism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Brancacci, A. 1985. Rhetorike philosophousa. Dione Crisostomo nella cultura antica e bizantina. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar

Branham, R. B. 1989. Unruly Eloquence: Lucian and the comedy of traditions. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bransbourg, G. 2009. ‘Julien, l’immunitas Christi, les dieux et les cités’, Antiquité Tardive 17: 151–58.Google Scholar

Breebaart, A. B. 1979. ‘Eunapius of Sardes and the Writing of History’, Mnemosyne 32: 360–75.Google Scholar

Bregman, J. 1982. Synesius of Cyrene, Philosopher–Bishop. Berkeley; London: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Brennan, B. 1976. ‘Dating Athanasius’ Vita Antonii’, Vigiliae Christianae 39: 209–27.Google Scholar

Brennecke, H. C. 1994. ‘Nicäa’, Theologische Realenziklopädie 24: 429–41.Google Scholar

Briquel, D. 1995. ‘L’empereur Claude comme auteur des ‘Tyrrhenika’, in Briquel, D. and Guittard, C. (eds.), Les écrivains et l’Etrusca disciplina de Claude à Trajan. Tours: Université de Tours, pp. 88–93.Google Scholar

Brisson, L. 1990. ‘L’Oracle d’Apollon dans la vie de Plotin’, Kernos 3: 77–88.Google Scholar

Brisson, L. 1996. Introduction à la philosophie du mythe. Tome 1: Sauver les myths. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Brown, P. 1988. The Body and Society: Men, Women and Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, P. 1992. Power and Persuasion in Late Antiquity: Towards a Christian Empire. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Browning, R. 1952. ‘The Riot of A.D. 387 in Antioch: The Role of Theatrical Claques in the Later Roman Empire’, Journal of Roman Studies 42: 13–20.Google Scholar

Browning, R. 1975. The Emperor Julian. London: Weidenfield & Nicolson.Google Scholar

Bruch, J., and Hermann, K.. 2012. ‘The Reception of the Philosopher-King in Antiquity and the Medieval Age’, in van Ackeren, M. (ed.), A Companion to Marcus Aurelius. Chichester; Malden, MA: Wiley–Blackwell, pp. 483–96.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. 1977. ‘Lex de imperio Vespasiani’, Journal of Roman Studies 67: 95–116.Google Scholar

Bryan, J. 2012. Likeness and Likelihood in the Presocratics and Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Burckhardt, J. 1853. Die Zeit Constantins des Großen. Basel: Schweighauser’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar

Burgersdijk, D. W. P. 2020. ‘Neoplatonic Philosophy in Tetrarchic and Constantinian Panegyric’, in Ross, and Omissi, (eds.), pp. 167–89.Google Scholar

Burgersdijk, D. W. P., and Ross, A. J. (eds.) 2018. Imagining Emperors in the Later Roman Empire. Leiden; Boston: Brill.Google Scholar

Burgess, R. 2008. ‘The Summer of Blood: the ‘Great Massacre’ of 337 and the Promotion of the Sons of Constantine’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 62: 5–51.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M., and Frede, M.. 2015. The Pseudo-Platonic Seventh Letter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Caltabiano, M. 1991. L’epistolario di Giuliano Imperatore. Saggio storico, traduzione, note e testo in appendice. Naples: D’Auria.Google Scholar

Cameron, Al. 1987. ‘Earthquake 400’, Chiron 17: 343–60.Google Scholar

Cameron, Al. 2011. The Last Pagans of Rome. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cameron, Al., and Long, J.. 1993. Barbarians and Politics at the Court of Arcadius. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Cameron, Av. 1965. ‘Procopius and the Church of St. Sophia’, Harvard Theological Review 58: 161–63.Google Scholar

Cameron, Av. 1991. Christianity and the Rhetoric of Empire: The Development of Christian Discourse. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Cameron, Av. 1997. ‘Eusebius’ Vita Constantini and the Construction of Constantine’, in Edwards, M. J. and Swain, S. (eds.), Portraits: Biographical Representation in the Greek and Latin Literature of the Roman Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 145–74.Google Scholar

Cameron, Av. 1998. ‘The Perception of Crisis’, Settimane di studio del centro italiano sull’alto medioevo 45: 9–31.Google Scholar

Cameron, Av. 2005. ‘The Reign of Constantine, A.D. 306–337’, Cambridge Ancient History XII: 90–109.Google Scholar

Cameron, Av., and Hall, S. G.. 1999. Life of Constantine. Eusebius. Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Carlà-Uhink, F. 2019. Diocleziano. Milan: Il Mulino.Google Scholar

Cartwright, S. 2016. ‘Athanasius’ Vita Antonii as Political Theology: The Call of Heavenly Citizenship’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History 67: 241–64.Google Scholar

Célérier, P. 2013. L’ombre de l’empereur Julian: le destine des écrits de Julien chez les auteurs païens et chrétiens du IVe au Vie siècle. Paris: Presses universitaires de Paris Ouest.Google Scholar

Centrone, B. 2000. ‘Platonism and Pythagoreanism in the Early Empire’, in Rowe, and Schofield, (eds.), pp. 559–83.Google Scholar

Cerutti, M. V. 2010. ‘‘Pagan Monotheism’? Towards a Historical Typology’, in Mitchell, S. and Van Nuffelen, P. (eds.), Monotheism between Pagans and Christians in Late Antiquity. Leuven; Walpole, MA: Peeters, pp. 15–32.Google Scholar

Chadwick, H. 2001. The Church in Ancient Society: From Galilee to Gregory the Great. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chantraine, H. 1993–94. ‘Die Kreuzesvision von 351 – Fakten und Probleme’, Byzantinische Zeitschrift 86–87: 430–41.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. 2015. ‘La Lettera a Temistio di Giuliano imperatore e il dibattito filosofico nel IV secolo’, in Marcone, (ed.), pp. 149–71.Google Scholar

Chin, C. M. 2008. Grammar and Christianity in the Late Roman World. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Civiletti, M. 2007. Eunapio. Vite di Filosofi e Sofisti. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar

Clark, G. 1989. Iamblichus, On the Pythagorean Life. Translated with notes and introduction. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, G. 2000a. ‘Philosophic Lives and the Philosophic Life. Porphyry and Iamblichus’, in Hagg, T. and Rousseau, P. (eds.), Greek Biography and Panegyric in Late Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 29–51.Google Scholar

Clark, G. 2000b. Porphyry. On Abstinence from Killing Animals. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Clark, G. 2004. Christianity and Roman Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Clarke, E. C. 1998. ‘Communication, Human and Divine. Saloustious Reconsidered’, Phronesis 43: 326–50.Google Scholar

Clarke, E. C. 2004. Iamblichus, De mysteriis. Translated with an introduction and notes by E. C. Clarke, J. M. Dillon, and J. P. Hershbell. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Cocchini, F. 2006. Origene. Teologo esegeta per un’identità cristiana. Bologna: EDB.Google Scholar

Conti, S. 2009. ‘Da eroe a dio: la concezione teocratica del potere in Giuliano’, Antiquité Tardive 17: 119–26.Google Scholar

Conybeare, C., and Goldhill, S. (eds.) 2021a. Classical Philology and Theology: Entanglement, Disavowal, and the Godlike Scholar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Conybeare, C., and Goldhill, S.. 2021b. ‘Philology’s Shadow’, in Conybeare, and Goldhill, (eds.), pp. 1–11.Google Scholar

Coogan, J. 2021. ‘Transforming Textuality: Porphyry, Eusebius, and Late Ancient Tables of Contents’, Studies in Late Antiquity 5: 6–27.Google Scholar

Cooley, A. 2007. ‘Septimius Severus: the Augustan Emperor’, in Swain, S., Harrison, S. J., and Elsner, J. (eds.), Severan Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 381–93.Google Scholar

Cooley, A. 2009. Res Gestae Divi Augusti. Text, Translation, and Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cooper, K. 1992. ‘Insinuation of Womanly Influence: An Aspect of the Christianisation of the Roman Aristocracy’, Journal of Roman Studies 82: 150–64.Google Scholar

Cooper, K. 1996. The Virgin and the Bride: Idealized Womanhood in Late Antiquity. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Cooper, K. 2019. ‘Constantine the Populist’, Journal of Early Christian Studies 27: 241–70.Google Scholar

Copeland, R., and Struck, P. T. (eds.) 2010. The Cambridge Companion to Allegory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Corbeill, A. 1996. Controlling Laughter: Political Humor in the Late Roman Republic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Corcoran, D. 1997. The Empire of the Tetrarchs: Imperial Pronouncements and Government, AD 284–324. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Corcoran, D. 2013. ‘The Gregorianus and Hermogenianus Assembled and Shattered’, Mélanges de l’Ecole française de Rome 125: 285–304.Google Scholar

Corke-Webster, J. 2019. Eusebius and Empire: Constructing Church and Rome in the Ecclesiastical History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Corke-Webster, J. 2020a. ‘How to Praise a Christian Emperor: The Panegyrical Experiments of Eusebius of Caesarea’, in Omissi, and Ross, (eds.), pp. 143–65.Google Scholar

Corke-Webster, J. 2020b. ‘A Bishop’s Biography: Eusebius of Caesarea’s Life of Constantine’, in de Temmerman, K. (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Ancient Biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 297–312.Google Scholar

Cox, P. 1983. Biography in Late Antiquity: A Quest for the Holy Man. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Cox Miller, P. ‘Strategies of Reprentation in Collective Biography: Constructing the Subject as Holy’, in Hägg, and Rousseau, (eds.), pp. 209–54.Google Scholar

Crawford, M. R. 2019. The Eusebian Canon Tables: Ordering Textual Knowledge in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Crawford, W. S. 1901. Synesius the Hellene. London: Rivingtons.Google Scholar

Cribiore, R. 2013. Libanius the Sophist: Rhetoric, Reality, and Religion in the Fourth Century. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Criscuolo, U. 1983. ‘Sull’epistola di Giuliano Imperatore al filosofo Temistio’, Koinonia 7: 89–111.Google Scholar

Criscuolo, U. 2001. ‘La religione diGiuliano’, Mediterraneo Antico 4: 365–88.Google Scholar

Criscuolo, U. 2012. ‘Sinesio di Cirene tra neoplatonismo e teologia patristica’, in Seng, and Hoffmann, (eds.), pp. 164–82.Google Scholar

Cristofoli, R. 2005. Costantino e l’Oratio ad sanctorum coetum. Naples: M. D’Auria.Google Scholar

Curta, F. 1995. ‘Atticism, Homer, Neoplatonism, and Fürstenspiegel: Julian’s Second Panegyric on Constantius’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 36: 177–211.Google Scholar

Dagron, G. 1968. L’Empire romain d’Orient au IVe siècle et les traditions politiques de l’hellénisme. Le témoignage de Thémistios. Paris: de Broccard.Google Scholar

Damgaard, F. 2013. ‘Propaganda against Propaganda. Revisiting Eusebius’ Use of the Figure of Moses in the Life of Contantine’, in Johnson, and Schott, (eds.), pp. 115–49.Google Scholar

Davies, J. P. (2004) Rome’s Religious History: Livy, Tacitus, and Ammianus on their Gods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dawson, D. 1992. Allegorical Readers and Cultural Revision in Acient Alexandria. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Dearn, A. 2003. ‘The Coinage of Vetranio: Imperial Representation and the Memory of Constantine the Great’, Numismatic Chronicle 163: 169–91.Google Scholar

De Blois, L. 1976. The Policy of Emperor Gallienus. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

De Blois, L. 2002. ‘The Crisis of the Third Century A.D. in the Roman Empire: A Modern Myth?’, in De Blois, L. and Rich, J. (eds.), The Transformation of Economic Life under the Roman Empire: Proceedings of the Second Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire. Amsterdam: Gieben, pp. 204–17.Google Scholar

Demoen, K. 1996. Pagan and Biblical Exempla in Gregory Nazianzen: A Study in Rhetoric and Hermeneutic. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar

Den Boeft, J., Drijvers, J. W., den Hengst, D., and Teitler, H. C. (1995) Philological and Historical Commentary on Ammianus Marcellinus XXII. Leiden; Boston: Brill.Google Scholar

DePalma Digeser, E. 2000. The Making of a Christian Empire: Lactantius and Rome. Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Desideri, P. 1978. Dione di Prusa. Un intellettuale greco nell’impero romano. Messina; Florence: G. d’Anna.Google Scholar

Desideri, P. 2012. ‘Introduzione’, in Vagnone, (ed.), pp 7–21.Google Scholar

De Vita, M. C. 2006. ‘Socrate filosofo politico e maschera letteraria nelle orazioni di Temistio: strategie di appropriazione di un mito’, in De Gregorio, G. and Medaglia, S. M. (eds.), Tradizione, ecdotica, esegesi. Miscellanea di studi. Naples: Arte Tipografica, pp. 7–41.Google Scholar

De Vita, M. C. 2010. ‘Cibele Neoplatonica: alcune osservazioni sull’inno giulianeo Alla Madre degli dèi (or. 8 Rochefort)’, in Talamo, C. (ed.), Saggi di commento a testi greci e latini. Pisa: ETS, pp. 154–77.Google Scholar

De Vita, M. C. 2011. Giuliano imperatore filosofo neoplatonico. Milan: Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar

De Vita, M. C. 2013. ‘Alcune variazioni sul mito di Socrate nella tarda antichità’, χώρα 11: 37–58.Google Scholar

De Vita, M. C. 2014. ‘Una nobile gara di pietà: il dibattito interreligioso nel panegirico di Temistio a Gioviano’, in Coppola, M., Fernicola, G. and Pappalardo, L. (eds.), Dialogus. Il dialogo fra le religioni nel pensiero tardo-antico, medievale e umanistico. Rome: Città Nuova, pp. 119–34.Google Scholar

De Vita, M. C. 2017a. ‘Giuliano l’Apostata e il Vangelo di Giovanni’, Koinonia 41: 147–67.Google Scholar

De Vita, M. C. 2017b. ‘Giuliano Imperatore e il culto delle immagini sacre: un esempio di philosophia telestike?’, in Canetti, L. (ed.), Statue. Rituali, Scienze e Magia dalla Tarda Antichità al Rinascimento. Florence: Sismel, pp. 67–85.Google Scholar

De Vita, M. C. 2022. Giuliano imperatore: Lettere e discorsi. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar

DeVore, D. J. 2013. ‘Greek Historiography, Roman Society, Christian Empire: The Ecclesiastical History of Eusebius of Caesarea’. Diss. University of California.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. M. 1986. ‘Plutarch and Second Century Platonism’, in Armstrong, A. H. (ed.), Classical Mediterranean Spirituality: Egyptian, Greek, Roman. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 214–29.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. M. 2001. ‘The Neoplatonic Reception of Plato’s Laws’, in Lisi, (ed.), pp. 241–54,Google Scholar

Dillon, J. M. 2006. ‘Pedantry and Pedestrianism? Some Reflections on the Middle Platonic Commentary Tradition’, in Tarrant, H. and Baltzly, D. (eds.), Reading Plato in Antiquity. London: Duckworth, pp. 19–31.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. M. 2012. ‘The Theology of Julian’s Hymn to King Helios’, in Dillon, J. (ed.), The Platonic Heritage. Farnham: Ashgate Variorum, pp. 103–15.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. M., and Gerson, L. P.. 2004. Neoplatonic Philosophy: Introductory Readings. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. N. 2012. The Justice of Constantine: Law, Communication, and Control. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Dolezal, S. 2006. ‘Johannes Chrysostomos and the Goths’, Acta Universitatis Carolinae 2: 165–85.Google Scholar

Dörrie, H. 1981. ‘Die Andere Theologie: Wie stellten die frühchristlichen Theologien des 2.–4. Jahrhunderts ihren Lesern die ‚Griechische Weisheit’ (= den Platonismus) dar?’, Theologie und Philosophie 56: 1–46.Google Scholar

Dörries, H. 1954. Das Selbstzeugnis Kaiser Konstantins. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Dossey, L. 2010. Peasants and Empire in Christian North Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Downey, G. 1959. ‘The Name of the Church of St. Sophia in Constantinople’, Harvard Theological Review 52: 37–41.Google Scholar

Drake, H. A. 1976. In Praise of Constantine: A Historical Study and New Translation of Eusebius’ Tricennial Orations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Drake, H. A. 1988. ‘What Eusebius Knew: The Genesis of the Vita Constantini’, Classical Philology 83: 20–38.Google Scholar

Drake, H. A. 2000. Constantine and the Bishops: The Politics of Intolerance. Baltimore; London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Drake, H. A. 2012a. ‘The Impact of Constantine on Christianity’, in Lenski, (ed.), pp. 111–36.Google Scholar

Drake, H. A. 2012b. ‘But I Digress … Rhetoric and Propaganda in Julian’s Second Oration to Constantius’, in Baker-Brian, and Tougher, (eds.), pp. 35–46.Google Scholar

Drake, H. A. 2020. A Century of Miracles: Christians, Pagans, Jews, and the Supernatural, 312–410. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Drinkwater, J. F. 1983. ‘The ‘Pagan Underground’, Constantius II’s ‘Secret Service’ and the Usurpation and Survival of Julian the Apostate’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History III. Brussels: Latomus, pp. 348–87.Google Scholar

Drinkwater, J. F. 2005. ‘Maximinus to Diocletian and the “crisis”’, Cambridge Ancient History XII: 28–66.Google Scholar

Drijvers, J. W. 2004. Cyril of Jerusalem: Bishop and City. Leiden; Boston: Brill.Google Scholar

Drozdek, A. 2007. Greek Philosophers as Theologians: The Divine Arche. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Duncan-Jones, R. 2004. ‘Economic Change and the Transition to Late Antiquity’, in Swain, S. and Edwards, M. (eds.), Approaching Late Antiquity: The Transformation from Early to Late Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 20–52.Google Scholar

Dvornik, F. 1955. ‘The Emperor Julian’s “Reactionary” Ideas on Kingship’, in Weitzmann, K. et al. (eds.), Late Classical and Medieval Studies in Honor of Albert Mathias Rend. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 71–81.Google Scholar

Dvornik, F. 1966. Early Christian and Byzantine Political Philosophy: Origins and Background. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Center for Byzantine Studies.Google Scholar

Easterling, P., and Miles, R.. 1996. ‘Dramatic Identities: Tragedy in late Antiquity’, in Miles, R. (ed.), Constructing Identities in late Antiquity. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 95–111.Google Scholar

Edwards, M. 1995. ‘The Arian Controversy and the Oration to the Saints’, Vigiliae Christianae 49: 379–87.Google Scholar

Edwards, M. 2003. Constantine and Christendom: The Oration to the Saints; the Greek and Latin Accounts of the Discovery of the Cross; the Edict of Constantine to Pope Silvester. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar

Edwards, M. 2006. ‘The First Council of Nicaea’, The Cambridge History of Christianity. Origins to Constantine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 552–67.Google Scholar

Edwards, M. 2018. Catholicity and Heresy in the Early Church. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Elliott, T. G. 1987. ‘Constantine’s Conversion: Do We Really Need It?’, Phoenix 41: 420–38.Google Scholar

Elm, S. 1997. ‘Isis’ Loss – Gender, Dependence and Ethnicity in Synesius’ de providentia or Egyptian Tale’, Zeitschrift für antikes Christentum 1: 86–115.Google Scholar

Elm, S. 2012. Sons of Hellenism, Fathers of the Church: Julian the Emperor, Gregory of Nazianzus and the Vision of Rome. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Elm, S. 2013. ‘Priest and Prophet: Gregory of Nazianzus’ concept of Christian leadership as Theosis’, in Stroumsa, G., Parker, R. and Dignas, B. (eds.), Priests and Prophets in the Roman World. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 162–84.Google Scholar

Elm, S. 2021. ‘Julian the Emperor on Statues (of Himself)’, in Conybeare, and Goldhill, (eds.), pp. 128–48.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. 1995. Art and the Roman Viewer: The Transformation of Art from the Pagan World to Christianity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. 1996. ‘Inventing Imperium: Texts and the Propaganda of Monuments’, in Elsner, J. (ed.), Art and Text in Roman Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 32–53.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. 2000. ‘From the Culture of Spolia to the Cult of Relics: The Arch of Constantine and the Genesis of Late Antique Forms’, Papers of the British School at Rome 68: 149–84.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. 2012. ‘Perspectives in Art’, in Lenski, (ed.), pp. 255–77.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. 2020. ‘Introduction’, in Elsner, J. (ed.), Empires of Faith in Late Antiquity: Histories of Art and Religion from India to Ireland. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar

Elsner, J., and Hernández Lobato, J. (eds.) 2017. The Poetics of Late Latin Literature. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Errington, M. 1997. ‘Church and State in the First Years of Theodosius I’, Chiron 27: 36–41.Google Scholar

Errington, M. 2000. ‘Themistius and His Emperors’, Chiron 30: 861–904.Google Scholar

Errington, M. 2006. Roman Imperial Policy from Julian to Theodosius. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Eshleman, K. 2012. The Social World of Intellectuals in the Roman Empire: Sophists, Philosophers, and Christians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Esmonde Cleary, A. S. 2013. The Roman West, AD 200–500: An Archaeological Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Falls, T. B. 2003. St. Justin Martyr. Dialogue with Trypho. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

Favale, A. 1958. Teofilo di Alessandria. Scritti, vita e dottrina. Turin: Società editrice internazionale.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. 1988. Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts and Beliefs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fejfer, J. 2008. Roman Portraits in Context. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Feissel, D. 2009. ‘Les acts de l’Etat impérial dans l’épigraphie tardive (324–610). Prolégomènes à un inventaire’, in Haensch, R. (ed.), Selbstdarstellung und Kommunikation. Die Veröffentlichung staatlicher Urkunden auf Stein und Bronze in der Römischen Welt. Munich: Beck, pp. 97–128.Google Scholar

Ferguson, J. 1991. Clement of Alexandria, Stromateis. Books One to Three. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

Ferrar, W. J. 1920. The Proof of the Gospel Being the Demonstratio Evangelica of Eusebius of Caesarea. London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge.Google Scholar

Ferrari, G. 1990. ‘Plato and Poetry’, in Kenney, G. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 92–148.Google Scholar

Finkelstein, A. 2018. The Specter of the Jews: Emperor Julian and the Rhetoric of Ethnicity in Syrian Antioch. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Fittschen, K. 1992–93. ‘Ritratti maschili privati di epoca adrianea. Problemi della loro varietà’, Scienze dell’antichità. Storia, archeologia, antropologia 6/7: 445–85.Google Scholar

Fittschen, K. 1997. ‘Privatporträts hadrianischer Zeit’, in Bouzek, J. and Ondrejová, I. (eds.), Roman Portraits: Artistic and literary. Mainz: von Zabern, pp. 32–36.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, A. 1930. The Essays and Hymns of Synesius of Cyrene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Flaig, E. 1999. ‘Über die Grenzen der Akkulturation: Wider die Verdinglichung des Kulturbegriffs’, in Vogt-Spira, G., Rommel, B., and Musäus, I. (eds.), Rezeption und Identität: die kulturelle Auseinandersetzung Roms mit Griechenland als europäisches Paradigma. Stuttgart: Steiner, pp. 81–112.Google Scholar

Flower, R. 2012. ‘Visions of Constantine’, Journal of Roman Studies 102: 287–305.Google Scholar

Flower, R. 2013. Emperors and Bishops in Late Roman Invective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Flower, R., and Ludlow, M.. 2020. Rhetoric and Religious Identity in Late Antiquity. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fontaine, J. 1987. ‘Introduzione’, in Fontaine, , Prato, , and Marcone, (eds.), pp. ix–lxxvii.Google Scholar

Fontaine, J., Prato, C., and Marcone, A.. 1987. Giuliano Imperatore. Alla madre degli dèi e altri discorsi. Milan: Arnaldo Mondadori Editore.Google Scholar

Ford, A. 2002. The Origins of Criticism: Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Fowden, G. 1978. ‘Bishops and Temples in the Eastern Roman Empire A.D. 320–435’, Journal of Theological Studies 29: 53–78.Google Scholar

Fowden, G. 1979. ‘Pagan Philosophers in Late Antique Society with Special Reference to Iamblichus and His Followers’. Diss. Oxford University.Google Scholar

Fowden, G. 1982. ‘The Pagan Holy Man in Late Antique Society’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 102: 33–59.Google Scholar

Fowden, G. 1985. Review of Bregman (1985) in Classical Philology 80: 281–85.Google Scholar

Fowden, G. 1991. ‘Constantine’s Porphyry Column: The Earliest Literary Allusion’, Journal of Roman Studies 81: 119–31.Google Scholar

Fowden, G. 1998. ‘Polytheist Religion and Philosophy’, Cambridge Ancient History XIII: 538–60.Google Scholar

Fowden, G. 2005. ‘Late Polytheism: The World-View’, Cambridge Ancient History XII: 521–37.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. (ed.) 2014. Plato in the Third Sophistic. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Fowler, R., and Quiroga Puertas, A.. 2014. ‘A Prolegomena to the Third Sophistic’, in Fowler, (ed.), pp. 1–30.Google Scholar

Franchi de’ Cavalieri, P. 1953. ‘I SS. Gioventino e Massimino’, in Note agiografiche 9: 167–200.Google Scholar

Frede, M. 2000. ‘The Philosopher’, in Brunschwig, J. and Lloyd, G. E. R. (eds.), Greek Thought: A Guide to Classical Knowledge. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Freisenbruch, A. 2007. ‘Back to Fronto: Doctor and Patient in his Correspondence with an Emperor’, in Morello, R. and Morrison, A. D. (eds.), Ancient Letters: Classical and Late Antique Epistolography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 235–56.Google Scholar

French, D. R. 1998. ‘Rhetoric and the Rebellion of A.D. 387 in Antioch’, Historia 47: 468–84.Google Scholar

Freudenburg, K. 2014. ‘“Recusatio” as Political Theatre: Horace’s Letter to Augustus’, Journal of Roman Studies 104: 105–32.Google Scholar

Gaisford, T. 1842. Eusebii Pamphili episcopi Caesariensis, Eclogae Propheticae, e codice manuscripto bibliothecae Caesareae Vindobonensis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Galvão-Sobrinho, C. R. 2013. Doctrine and Power: Theological Controversy and Christian Leadership in the later Roman Empire. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Gangloff, A. 2018. Pouvoir impérial et vertus philosophiques: l’évolution de la figure du bon prince sous le Haut-Empire. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

García-Ruiz, M. P. 2015. ‘Una Lectura Conjuncta del Primer Encomio A Constancio y el Encomio A Eusebia de Juliano’, Exemplaria Classica 19: 155–73.Google Scholar

García-Ruiz, M. P. 2018. ‘Julian’s Self-Representation in Coins and Texts’, in Burgersdijk, and Ross, (eds.), pp. 204–33.Google Scholar

Garnsey, P. 1984. ‘Religious Toleration in Classical Antiquity’, Studies in Church History 21: 1–27.Google Scholar

Garnsey, P. 2000. ‘Introduction: The Hellenistic and Roman Periods’, in Rowe, and Schofield, (eds.), pp. 397–414.Google Scholar

Garnsey, P. 2003. ‘Introduction’, in Bowen, and Garnsey, , pp. 1–54.Google Scholar

Garnsey, P., and Humfress, C.. 2001. The Evolution of the Late Antique World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Garnsey, P., and Winton, R.. 1981. ‘Political Theory’, in Finley, M. I. (ed.), The Legacy of Greece. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Garzya, A. 1972. ‘Il ‘Dione’ di Sinesio nel quadro del dibattito culturale del IV secolo d.C.’, Rivista di Filologia e Istruzione Classica 100: 32–45.Google Scholar

Garzya, A. 1989. Opere di Sinesio di Cirene. Turin: UTET.Google Scholar

Garzya, A., and Roques, D.. 2000a. Synésios de Cyrène, tome I: Correspondance (lettres I–LXIII). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Garzya, A., and Roques, D.. 2000b. Synésios de Cyrène, tome II : Correspondance (lettres LXIV–CLVI). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Gassman, M. 2016. ‘Eschatology and Politics in Cyril of Jerusalm’s Epistle to Constantius’, Vigiliae Christianae 70: 119–33.Google Scholar

Gassman, M. 2020. Worshippers of the Gods: Debating Paganism in the Fourth Century Roman West. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gaudemet, J. 1958. L’Église dans l’Empire Romain: IVe–Ve siècles. Paris: Sirey.Google Scholar

Geffcken, J. 1914. Kaiser Iulianus. Leipzig: Dieterich.Google Scholar

Germino, E. 2004. Scuola e cultura nella legislazione di Giuliano l‘Apostata. Naples: Eugenio Jovene.Google Scholar

Gifford, E. H. 1903. Eusebii Pamphili Evangelicae praeparationis libri XV. Ad codices manuscriptos denuo collatos recensuit, anglice nunc primum reddidit, notis et indicibus instruxit. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Girardet, K. M. 2007. Die Konstantinische Wende: Voraussetzungen und Geistige Grundlagen der Religionspolitik Konstantins des Grossen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Girardet, K. M. 2013. Konstantin. Rede an die Versammlung der Heiligen. Freiburg: Herder.Google Scholar

Gleason, M. 1995. Making Men: Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. 1995. Foucault’s Virginity: Ancient Erotic Fiction and the History of Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. 2001a. Being Greek under Rome. Cultural Identity, the Second Sophistic and the Development of the Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. 2001b. ‘The Erotic Eye: Visual Stimulation and Cultural Conflict’, in Goldhill (2001a), pp. 154–94.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. 2002. Who Needs Greek? Contests in the Cultural History of Hellenism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. 2006. ‘Rethinking Religious Revolution’, in Goldhill, and Osborne, (eds.), pp. 141–63.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. 2009. ‘Constructing Identity in the Love Letters of Philostratus’, in Bowie, E. and Elsner, J. (eds.), Philostratus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 287–308.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. 2020. Preposterous Poetics: The Politics and Aesthetics of Form in Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. 2021. ‘The Union and Divorce of Classical Philology and Theology’, in Conybeare, and Goldhill, (eds.), pp. 33–62.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. 2022. The Christian Invention of Time: Temporality and the Literature of Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S., and Greensmith, E.. 2020. ‘Gregory of Nazianzus in the Palatine Anthology: The Poetics of Christian Death’, The Cambridge Classical Journal 66: 29–69.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S., and Osborne, R. (eds.) 2006. Rethinking Revolutions through Ancient Greece. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Goulet, R. 2008. ‘Réflexions sur la loi scolaire de l’empereur Julien’, in Hugonnard-Roche, J. (ed.), L’enseignement supérieur dans les mondes antiques et médiévaux. Paris: Vrin, pp. 175–200.Google Scholar

Grafton, A. 2008. Christianity and the Transformation of the Book: Origen, Eusebius, and the Library of Caesarea. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Green, R. P. H. 2010. ‘Constantine as Patron of Christian Latin Poetry’, Studia Patristica 46: 65–76.Google Scholar

Greenlee, C. 2020. ‘The Ideology of Imperial Unity in Themistius (Or. 1) and Libanius (Or. 59)’, in Baker-Brian, and Tougher, (eds.), pp. 133–56.Google Scholar

Greenwood, D. N. 2013. ‘A Cautionary Note on Julian’s Pagan Trinity’, Ancient Philosophy 33: 391–402.Google Scholar

Greenwood, D. N. 2014. ‘Crafting Divine Personae in Julian’s Or. 7’, Classical Philology 109: 140–49.Google Scholar

Greenwood, D. N. 2017a. ‘Constantinian Influence upon Julian’s Pagan Church’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History 68: 1–21.Google Scholar

Greenwood, D. N. 2017b. ‘Julian’s Use of Asclepius against the Christians’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 109: 491–509.Google Scholar

Greenwood, D. N. 2019. ‘Homer and the Wrath of Julian’, Classical Quarterly 69: 887–95.Google Scholar

Greenwood, D. N. 2021. Julian and Christianity. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Gregg, R. C. 1980. The Life of Antony; and the Letter to Marcellinus. Athanasius. London: SPCK.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. 2013. Experience and Teleology in Ancient Historiography: ‘Future Past’ from Herodotus to Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Grillet, B., and Guinot, J. -N.. 1990. Homélie sur Babylas. Introduction, texte critique, traduction et notes. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar

Grimaldi, W. M. A. 1980. ‘Semeion, Tekmerion, Eikos in Aristotle’s Rhetoric’, American Journal of Philology 101: 383–98.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. 1984. The Hellenistic World and the Coming of Rome. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. 1992. Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Guidetti, F. 2013. ‘Iconografia di Costantino. L’invenzione di una nuova immagine imperiale’, in Melloni, A. (ed.) Costantino I. Enciclopedia costantiniana sulla figura e l’immagine dell’imperatore del cosiddetto editto di Milano, 313–2013, Rome: Treccani, II 185–200, 961–79Google Scholar

Guidetti, F. 2015. ‘I ritratti dell’imperatore Giuliano’, in Marcone, (ed.), pp. 12–49.Google Scholar

Haas, C. 1997. Alexandria in Late Antiquity: Topography and Social Conflict. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Habinek, T. 2017. ‘Optatian and His Oeuvre: Explorations in Ontology’, in Squire, and Wienand, (eds.), pp. 391–425.Google Scholar

Hadijttofi, F., and Lefteratou, A. (eds.) 2020. The Genres of Late Antique Christian Poetry: Between Modulations and Transpositions. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hadot, P. 1977. Ambroise de Milan, Apologie de David. Introd., texte latin, notes et index. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar

Hadot, P. 1981. Exercices spirituels et philosophie antique. Paris: Etudes augustiniennes.Google Scholar

Hafner, M. 2017. Lukians Schrift ‘Das traurige Los der Gelehrten’: Einführung und Kommentar zu De Mercede Conductis Potentium Familiaribus. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar

Hägg, T., and Rousseau, P. (eds.) 2000. Greek Biography and Panegyric in Late Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Hagl, W. 1997. Arcadius Apis Imperator: Synesius von Kyrene und sein Beitrag zum Herrscherideal der Spätantike. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar

Hahn, J. 1989. Der Philosoph und die Gesellschaft: Selbstverständnis, öffentliches Auftreten und populäre Erwartungen in der hohen Kaiserzeit. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar

Haines, C. R. 1962. The Correspondence of Marcus Cornelius Fronto. Cambridge, MA; London: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Hall, S. G. 1998. ‘Some Constantinian Documents in the Vita Constantini’, in Lieu, S. N. C. and Monstserrat, D. (eds.), Constantine: History, Historiography and Legend. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 86–103.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. 2008. Greek Laughter: A Study of Cultural Psychology from Homer to Early Christianity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hannestad, N. 2007. ‘Die Porträtskulptur zur Zeit Konstantins des Grossen’, in Demandt, A. and Engemann, J. (eds.), Konstantin der Grosse. Trier: Rheinisches Landesmuseum, pp. 96–116.Google Scholar

Harkins, P. W. 1963. St John Chrysostom: Baptismal Instructions. Translated and annotated. New York: Newman Press.Google Scholar

Harl, M. 1982. ‘Origène et les interpretations patristiques greques de l’obscurité biblique’, Vigiliae Christianae 36: 334–71.Google Scholar

Harries, J. 2012. ‘Julian the Lawgiver’, in Baker-Brian, and Tougher, (eds.), pp. 121–36.Google Scholar

Hartmann, U. 2008. ‘Claudius Gothicus und Aurelianus’, in Johne, K.-P. (ed.), Die Zeit der Soldatenkaiser. Krise und Transformation des Römischen Reiches im 3. Jahrhundert n. Chr. (235–284). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hartney, A. M. 2004. John Chrysostom and the Transformation of the City. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Heather, P. J. 1998. ‘Themistius: A Political Philosopher’, in Whitby, (ed.), pp. 125–50.Google Scholar

Heather, P. J. 2020. ‘The Gallic Wars of Julian Caesar’, in Rebenich, and Wiemer, (eds.), pp. 64–96.Google Scholar

Heather, P. J., and Matthews, J.. 1991. The Goths in the Fourth Century. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar

Heather, P. J., and Moncur, D.. 2001. Politics, Philosophy, and Empire in the Fourth Century: Select Orations of Themistius. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar

Heck, E. 2009. ‘Constantin und Lactanz in Trier – Chronologisches’, Historia 58: 118–30.Google Scholar

Heim, F. 1992. La Théologie de la victoire de Constantine à Theodose. Paris: Beauchesne.Google Scholar

Helm, R. 1956. Die Chronik des Hieronymus. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar

Henck, N. 2001. ‘Constantius’ paideia, Intellectual Milieu and Promotion of the Liberal Arts’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 47: 172–82.Google Scholar

Henck, N. 2002. ‘Constantius ὀ Φιλοκτίστης?’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 55: 279–304.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. 2002. Pliny’s Statue: The Letters, Self-Portraiture and Classical Art. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.Google Scholar

Henrichs, A. 1995. ‘Graecia Capta: Roman Views of Greek Culture’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 97: 243–61.Google Scholar

Hidber, T. 2006. Herodians Darstellung der Kaisergeschichte nach Marc Aurel. Basel: Schwabe.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, L. M. 2012. ‘Die Lebenswelt des Synesius von Kyrene – ein historischer Überblick’, in Seng, and Hoffmann, (eds.), pp. 35–65.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, P. (2009) ‘What Was Commentary in Late Antiquity? The Example of the Neoplatonic Commentators’, in Gill, M. L. and Pellegrine, P. (eds.), Companion to Ancient Philosophy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 597–622.Google Scholar

Hollerich, M. J. 1989. ‘The Comparison of Moses and Constantine in Eusebius of Caesarea’s Life of Constantine’, Studia Patristica 19: 80–95.Google Scholar

Hopkins, K. 1998. ‘Christian Number and Its Implications’, Journal of Early Christian Studies 6: 185–226.Google Scholar

Horst, C. 2013. Marc Aurel: Philosophie und politische Macht zur Zeit der Zweiten Sophistik. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar

Humfress, C. 2007. Orthodoxy and the Courts in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Humphries, M. 1997. ‘In Nomine Patris: Constantine the Great and Constantius II in Christological Polemic’, Historia 46: 448–64.Google Scholar

Humphries, M. 1998. ‘Savage Humour: Christian Anti-panegyric in Hilary of Poitiers’ Against Constantius’, in Whitby, (ed.), pp. 201–23.Google Scholar

Humphries, M. 2012. ‘The Tyrant’s Mask? Images of Good and Bad Rule in Julian’s Letter to the Athenians’, in Baker-Brian, and Tougher, (eds.), pp. 75–90.Google Scholar

Hunt, D. 1995. ‘Julian and Marcus Aurelius’, in Innes, D., Hine, H., and Pelling, C. (eds.), Ethics and Rhetoric: Classical Essays for D. Russell on his Seventy-Fifth Birthday. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 287–98.Google Scholar

Hunt, D. 1997. ‘The Church as a Public Institution’, Cambridge Ancient History XIII: 238–76.Google Scholar

Hunt, D. 2012. ‘The Christian Context of Julian’s against the Galileans’, in Baker-Brian, and Tougher, (eds.), pp. 251–61.Google Scholar

Hunter, D. G. 1988. A Comparison between a King and a Monk; Against the Opponents of the Monastic Life: Two Treatises by John Chrysostom. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar

Hunter, D. G. 1989. ‘Libanius and John Chrysostom: New Thoughts on an Old Problem’, Studia Patristica 22: 129–35.Google Scholar

Huttner, U. 2004. Recusatio imperii: ein politisches Ritual zwischen Ethik und Taktik. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. 1998. Cicero’s Correspondence: A Literary Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Inowlocki, S. 2004. ‘Eusebius of Caesarea’s ‘interpretatio Christiana’ of Philo’s De vita contemplativa’, Harvard Theological Review 97: 305–28.Google Scholar

Inowlocki, S. 2006. Eusebius and the Jewish Authors: His Citation Technique in an Apologetic Context. Leiden; Boston: Brill.Google Scholar

Inowlocki, S. 2007. ‘Eusebius’ Appropriation of Moses in an Apologetic Context’, in Graupner, A. and Wolter, M. (eds.), Moses in Biblical and Extra-Biblical Traditions. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter, pp. 241–55.Google Scholar

Ip, P. H. 2022. ‘Thinking with Origen Today: Hermeneutical Challenges and Future Directions’, Modern Theology 38: 191–203.Google Scholar

Isele, B. 2010. Kampf um Kirchen: religiöse Gewalt, heiliger Raum und christiche Topographie in Alexandria und Konstantinopel (4. Jh.). Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar

James, L. 2012. ‘Is There an Empress in the Text? Julian’s Speech of Thanks to Eusebia’, in Baker-Brian, and Tougher, (eds.), pp. 47–60.Google Scholar

Johnson, A. 2006. Ethnicity and Argument in Eusebius’ Praeparatio Evangelica. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, A. 2013. Religion and Identity in Porphyry of Tyre: the Limits of Hellenism in Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, A. 2014. Eusebius. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar

Johnson, A. 2020. ‘The Rhetoric of Pagan Religious Identities: Porphyry and his First Readers’, in Flower, R. and Ludlow, M. (eds.), Rhetoric and Religious Identity in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 28–47.Google Scholar

Johnson, A., and Schott, J. (eds.) 2013. Eusebius of Caesarea: Tradition and Innovations, Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies.Google Scholar

Jones, A. H. M. 1949. Constantine and the Conversion of Europe. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar

Jones, A. H. M. 1964. The Later Roman Empire, 284–602: A Social, Economical and Administrative Survey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jones, A. H. M., and Skeat, T.. 1954. ‘Note on the Genuineness of the Constantinian Documents in Eusebius’ Life of Constantine and Appendix’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History 5: 196–200.Google Scholar

Jones, C. P. 1978. The Roman World of Dio Chrysostom. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Jones, C. P. 2010. ‘Themistius after the Death of Julian’, Historia 59: 501–6.Google Scholar

Kahlos, M. 2007. Debate and Dialogue: Christian and Pagan Cultures c. 360–430, Aldershot; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Kahlos, M. 2009. Forbearance and Compulsion: The Rhetoric of Religious Tolerance and Intolerance in Late Antiquity. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Kahlos, M. 2012. ‘Pagan-Christian Debates over the Interpretation of Texts in Late Antiquity’, Classical World 105: 525–45.Google Scholar

Kahlos, M. 2019. Religious Dissent in Late Antiquity, 350–450. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kaiser, W. 2015. ‘Justinian and the Corpus Iuris Civilis’, The Cambridge Companion to Roman Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 119–48.Google Scholar

Karla, G. 2020. ‘Libanius’ Imperial Speech to Constantius II and Constans (Or. 59): Context, Tradition and, Innovation’, in Omissi, and Ross, (eds.), pp. 67–90.Google Scholar

Kaster, B. 1983. ‘The Salaries of Libanius’, Chiron 13: 37–59.Google Scholar

Kelly, C. 2007. ‘Riot Control and Imperial Ideology in the Roman Empire’, Phoenix 61: 150–76.Google Scholar

Kelly, C. 2012. ‘Bureaucracy and Government’, in Lenski, (ed.), pp. 183–204.Google Scholar

Kelly, G. 2008. Ammianus Marcellinus: The Allusive Historian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kelly, J. N. D. 1995. Golden Mouth: The Story of John Chrysostom, Ascetic, Preacher, Bishop. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Kennedy, G. A. 1983. Greek Rhetoric under Christian Emperors. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Key Fowden, E., and Fowden, G.. 2008. Contextualising Late Greek philosophy, Athens; Paris: National Hellenic Research Foundation.Google Scholar

King, C. W. 1888. Julian the Emperor: Containing Gregory Nazianzen’s Two Invectives and Libanius’ Monody with Julian’s Extant Theosophical Works. London: Bell.Google Scholar

Klauser, T. 1944. ‘Aurum Coronarium’, Römische Mitteilungen 59: 129–53.Google Scholar

Klein, R. 1977. Constantius II. und die Christliche Kirche. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Klein, R. (1982) ‘Zur Glaubwürdigkeit historischer Aussagen des Bischofs Athnasius von Alexandria über die Religionspolitik des Kaisers Constantius II’, Studia Patristica 17: 996–1017.Google Scholar

Koch, W. 1927–28. ‘Comment l’empereur Julian tâcha de fonder une église païenne’, Revue Belge de Philologie et d’Historie 6: 123–46; 7: 42–82, 511–50, 1363–85.Google Scholar

Kofsky, A. 2000. Eusebius of Caesarea against Paganism. Leiden; Boston: Brill.Google Scholar

Kolb, F. 2004. ‘Praesens Deus: Kaiser und Gott unter der Tetrarchie’, in Demandt, A., Goltz, A., and Schlange-Schöningen, H. (eds.), Diokletian und die Tetrarchie: Aspekte einer Zeitwende. Berlin; New York: de Gruyter, pp. 27–37.Google Scholar

König, J. 2012. Saints and Symposiasts: The Literature of Food and the Symposium in Greco-Roman and Early Christian Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

König, J., and Whitmarsh, T. (eds.) 2007. Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Körfer, A. L. 2019. Kaiser Konstantin als Leser: Panegyrik, performance und Poetologie in den carmina Optatians. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kurfess, A. 1918. ‘Das Akrostichon Ἰησοῦς Χρειστὸς Θεοῦ Ὑιὸς Σωτὴρ Σταυρός’, Sokrates 6: 99–105.Google Scholar

Kurmann, A. 1988. Gregor von Nazianz, Oratio 4 gegen Julian: ein Kommentar. Basel: Reinhardt.Google Scholar

Labriola, I. 1972. Messaggio agli Ateniesi. Saggio e traduzione. Florence: La Nuova Italia Editrice.Google Scholar

Lacombrade, C. 1951a. Synésios de Cyrène Hellène et chrétien. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Lacombrade, C. 1951b. Le Discours sur la Royauté de Synésios de Cyrène à l’empereur Arcadios. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Lacombrade, C. 1964. L’Empereur Julien, oeuvres complètes, t. II, 2e p.: Discours de Julien Empereur. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Lacombrade, C. 1978. Synésios de Cyrene, tome I: Hymnes. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Lacoste, J.-Y. 2014. ‘Theōria, vita philosophica, and Christian Experience’, in From Theology to Theological Thinking, translated by W. C. Hackett. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar

Lamberton, R. 1986. Homer the Theologian: Neoplatonist Allegorical Reading and the Growth of the Epic Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Lamoureux, J., and Aujoulat, N.. 2004. Synésios de Cyrène, tome IV: Opuscules I. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Lamoureux, J., and Aujoulat, N.. 2008a. Synésios de Cyrène, tome V: Opuscules II. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Lamoureux, J., and Aujoulat, N.. 2008b. Synésios de Cyrène, tome VI: Opuscules III. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Lane Fox, R. 1986. Pagans and Christians. London: Viking.Google Scholar

Lane Fox, R. 2015. Augustine: Conversions and Confessions. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Lauwers, J. 2013. ‘Systems of Sophistry and Philosophy: The Case of the Second Sophistic’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 107: 331–63.Google Scholar

Lavan, M. 2018. ‘Pliny Epistles 10 and Imperial Correspondence: The Empire of Letters’, in König, A. and Whitton, C. (eds.), Roman Literature under Nerva, Trajan, and Hadrian. Literary Interactions, D 96–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 280–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, A. D. 1993. Information and Frontiers: Roman Foreign Relations in Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lee, A. D. 2012. ‘Traditional Religions’, in Lenski, (ed.), pp. 159–80.Google Scholar

Lenski, N. (ed.) 2012a. The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Constantine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lenski, N. 2012b. ‘The Reign of Constantine’, in Lenski, (ed.), pp. 59–90.Google Scholar

Lenski, N. 2014. Failure of Empire: Valens and the Roman state in the fourth century A.D. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Lenski, N. 2016. Constantine and the Cities: Imperial Authority and Civic Politics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Lettieri, G. 2013. ‘Lattanzio ideologo della svolta costantiniana’, in Enciclopedia Costantiniana. Milan: I 45–57.Google Scholar

Levick, B. 2010. Augustus: Image and Substance. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lianeri, A. 2016. Knowing Future Time in and through Greek Historiography. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liebeschuetz, J. H. W. G. 1990. Barbarians and Bishops: Army, Church, and State in the Age of Arcadius and Chrysostom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Liebeschuetz, J. H. W. G. 2005. Ambrose of Milan: Political Letters and Speeches. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar

Liebeschuetz, J. H. W. G. 2007. ‘Was There a Crisis of the third Century?’, in Hekster, O., de Kleijn, G. and Slootijes, D. (eds.), Crises and the Roman Empire: Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire. Leiden: Brill, pp. 11–20.Google Scholar

Liebeschuetz, J. H. W. G. 2011. Ambrose and John Chrysostom: Clerics between Desert and Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Liebeschuetz, J. H. W. G. 2012. ‘Julian’s Hymn to the Mother of the Gods’, in Baker-Brian, and Tougher, (eds.), pp. 213–27.Google Scholar

Lieu, S. C. 1986. The Emperor Julian: Panegyric and Polemic. Claudius Mamertinus, John Chrysostom, Ephrem the Syrian. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar

Lieu, S. C. 2004. Christian Identity in the Jewish and Graeco-Roman World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lisi, F. L. 2001. Plato’s Laws and Its Historical Significance: Selected Papers of the International Congress on Ancient Thought. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar

Lizzi Testa, R. 1987. Il potere episcopale nell’Oriente romano. Rappresentazione ideologica e realtà politica (IV–V sec. d.C.). Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.Google Scholar

Lizzi Testa, R. 1999. ‘Synesius’, in Bowersock, G. W., Brown, P., and Grabar, O. (eds.), Late Antiquity, a Guide to the Postclassical World. Cambridge, MA; London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, p. 710.Google Scholar

Lizzi Testa, R. 2007. ‘The Late Antique Bishop: Image and Reality’, in Rousseau, Ph. (ed.), A Companion to Late Antiquity. Chichester: Wiley–Blackwell, pp. 525–38.Google Scholar

Long, J. 1996. Claudian’s in Eutropium: Or, How, When, and Why to Slander a Eunuch. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Long, J. 2012. ‘Afterword: Studying Julian the Author’, in Baker-Brian, and Tougher, (eds.), pp. 323–38.Google Scholar

López-Sánchez, F. 2012. ‘Julian and His Coinage, a Very Constantinian Prince’, in Baker-Brian, and Tougher, (eds.), pp. 159–81.Google Scholar

Lössl, J. 2012. ‘Julian’s Consolation to Himself on the Departure of the Excellent Salutius: Rhetoric and Philosophy in the Fourth Century’, in Baker-Brian, and Tougher, (eds.), pp. 61–74.Google Scholar

Louth, A. 2003. ‘The Collectio Sabbaitica and Sixth Century Origenism’, in Perrone, L. (ed.) Origeniana Octava. Origen and the Alexandrian Tradition. Leuven: Leuven University Press, pp. 1167–76.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. 2009. Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lucrezi, F. 1995. Aspetti giuridici del principato di Vespasiano. Naples: Eugenio Jovene.Google Scholar

Lunn-Rockliffe, S. 2017. ‘The Power of the Jewelled Style: Christian Signs and Names in Optatian’s versus intexti and on Gems’, in Squire, and Wienand, (eds.), pp. 427–60.Google Scholar

Lutz, C. E. 2020. Musonius Rufus. That One Should Disdain Hardships: The Teachings of a Roman Stoic. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

MacCormack, S. 1981. Art and Ceremony in Late Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

MacMullen, R. 1969. Constantine. New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar

MacMullen, R. 1976. Roman Government’s Response to Crisis, A.D. 235–337. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Maisano, R. 1994. ‘La funzione dei richiami platonici nei discorsi di Temistio’, in Curti, C. and Crimi, C. (eds.), Scritti classici e cristiani offerti a Francesco Corsaro. Catania: Università degli studi di Catania, pp. 415–29.Google Scholar

Maisano, R. 1995. Temistio. Discorsi. Turin: UTET.Google Scholar

Maisano, R. 2006. ‘Patrimonio culturale “di prima mano” e “di seconda mano” nei discorsi di Temistio’, in Amato, E. (ed.), Approches de la Troisième Sophistique. Hommages à Jacques Schamp. Brussels: Éditions Latomus.Google Scholar

Malingrey, A.-M. 1961. Philosophia. étude d’un group des mots dans la littérature grecque, des présocratiques au IVe siècle après J.-C. Paris: C. Klincksieck.Google Scholar

Malingrey, A.-M. 1972. Jean Chrysostome. Sur la Vaine Gloire et l’Éducation des Enfants. Introduction, texte critique, traduction et notes. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar

Malingrey, A.-M. 1980. Jean Chrysostome. Sur le Sacerdoce (dialogue et homélie); introduction, texte critique, traduction et notes. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar

Malosse, P.-L. 2008. ‘Jean Chrysostome a-t-il été l’éleve de Libanios ?’, Phoenix 62: 273–80.Google Scholar

Maltagliati, G. 2020. ‘Persuasion through Proximity (and Distance) in the Attic Orators’ Historical Examples’, Greek Roman and Byzantine Studies 60: 68–97.Google Scholar

Mantovani, D. 2009. ‘Lex ‘regia’ de imperio Vespasiani. Il vagum imperium e la legge costante’, in Capogrossi Colognesi, L. and Tassi Scandone, E. (eds.), La Lex de Imperio Vespasiani e la Roma dei Flavi. Atti del Convegno, 20–22 novembre 2008. Rome: l’Erma di Bretschneider, pp. 125–55.Google Scholar

Maraval, P. 2013. Les fils de Constantin: Constantin II (337–340), Constance II (337–361), Constant (337–350). Paris: CRNS Editions.Google Scholar

Marcone, A. 1984. ‘Un panegirico rovesciato. Pluralità di modelli e contaminazione letteraria nel Misopogon giulianeo’, Revue d’Études Augustiniennes 30: 226–39.Google Scholar

Marcone, A. 2012. ‘The Forging of a Hellenic Orthodoxy: Julian’s Speeches against the Cynics’, in Baker-Brian, and Tougher, (eds.), pp. 239–50.Google Scholar

Marcone, A. 2015. L’imperatore Giuliano. Realtà storica e rappresentazione. Milan; Florence: Le Monnier Università.Google Scholar

Marcone, A. 2019. Giuliano. Rome: Salerno editrice.Google Scholar

Marcos, M. 2009. ‘“He Forced with Gentleness”. Emperor Julian’s Attitude to Religious Coercion’, Antiquité Tardive 19: 191–204.Google Scholar

Markus, R. A. 1990. The End of Ancient Christianity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Marlowe, E. (2016) ‘The Multivalence of Memory: The Tetrarchs, the Senate, and the Vicennalia Monument in the Roman Forum’, in Galinsky, K. and Lapatin, K. (eds.), Cultural Memories in the Roman Empire. Los Angeles: Getty: 240–62.Google Scholar

Marchesi, I. 2008. The Art of Pliny’s Letters: A Poetics of Allusion in the Private Correspondence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Martens, J. 1994. ‘Nomos Empsychos in Philo and Clement of Alexandria’, in Helleman, W. E. (ed.), Hellenization revisited. Lanham; London: University Press of America, pp. 323–38.Google Scholar

Masaracchia, E. 1990. Contra Galilaeos. Giuliano Imperatore; introduzione, testo critico e traduzione. Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.Google Scholar

Mathew, G. 1943. ‘The Character of the Gallienic Renaissance’, Journal of Roman Studies 33: 65–70.Google Scholar

Matthews, J. 1989. The Roman Empire of Ammianus. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Maxwell, J. L. 2006. Christianisation and Communication in Late Antiquity: John Chrysostom and His Congregation in Antioch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mazza, M. 1986. ‘Filosofia religiosa ed Imperium in Giuliano’, in Mazza, M. (ed.), Le maschere del potere. Cultura e politica nella tarda antichità. Naples: Eugenio Jovene, pp. 95–148.Google Scholar

McCormick, M. 1986. Eternal Victory: Triumphal Rulership in Late Antiquity, Byzantium, and the Early Medieval West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McLynn, N. B. 1994. Ambrose of Milan: Church and Court in a Christian Capital. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

McLynn, N. B. 2005. ‘“Genere hispanus”: Theodosius, Spain, and Nicene Orthodoxy’, in Bowes, K. D. and Kulikowski, M. (eds.), Hispania in Late Antiquity: Current Perspectives. Boston; Leiden: Brill 77–120.Google Scholar

McLynn, N. B. 2006. ‘Among the Hellenists: Gregory and the Sophists’, in McLynn, N. (ed.), Christian Politics and Religious Culture in Late Antiquity. Farnham: Ashgate Variorum, pp. 213–38.Google Scholar

McLynn, N. B. 2014. ‘Julian and the Christian Professors’, in Harrison, G., Humfress, C., and Sandwell, I. (eds.) Being Christian in Late Antiquity: A Festschrift for Gillian Clark. Oxford University Press, pp. 120–38.Google Scholar

Metzger, E. 1998. A Companion to Justinian’s Institutes. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Meyer, R. T. 1985. Palladius. Dialogue on the Life of John Chrysostom. New York: Newman Press.Google Scholar

Moles, J. L. 1990. ‘The Kingship Orations of Dio Chrysostom’, Papers of the Leeds Latin Seminar 6: 297–365.Google Scholar

Momigliano, A. 1963. ‘Pagan and Christian Historiography in the Fourth Century A.D.’, in The Conflict between Paganism and Christianity in the Fourth Century: Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 79–99.Google Scholar

Momigliano, A. 1971. The Development of Greek Biography: Four Lectures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Momigliano, A. 1973. ‘Freedom of Speech in Antiquity’, in Wiener, P. P. (ed.), Dictionary of the History of Ideas: Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas. New York: Scribners, II pp. 252–63.Google Scholar

Momigliano, A. 1987. ‘Ancient Biography and the Study of Religion in the Roman Empire’, in On Pagans, Jews, and Christians, Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press, pp. 159–77.Google Scholar

Morgan, T. 2015. Roman Faith and Christian Faith: pistis and fides in the Early Roman Empire and Early Churches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Moser, M. 2018. Emperors and Senators in the Reign of Constantius II: Maintaining Imperial Rule between Rome and Constantinople in the Fourth Century AD. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Moss, J. 2007. ‘The Doctor and the Pastry Chef: Pleasure and Persuasion in Plato’s Gorgias’, Ancient Philosophy 27: 229–49.Google Scholar

Most, G. W. 2010. ‘Hellenistic Allegory and Early Imperial Rhetoric’, in Copeland, and Struck, (eds.), pp. 26–38.Google Scholar

Müller, F. L. 1998. Die beiden Satiren des Kaisers Julianus Apostata. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar

Naber, S. A. (1867) M. Cornelii Frontonis et M. Aurelii Imperatoris Epistulae: L. veri et T. Antonini Pii et Appiani Epistularum Reliquiae. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

Nasrallah, L. S. 2010. Christian Responses to Roman Art and Architecture: The Second-Century Church amid the Spaces of Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nesselrath, H.-G. 2008. ‘Mit “Waffen” Platonis gegen ein christliches Imperium: der Mythos in Julians Schrift Gegen den Kyniker Herakleios’, in Schäfer, (ed.), pp. 207–19.Google Scholar

Nesselrath, H.-G. 2020. ‘Julian’s Philosophical Writings’, in Rebenich, and Wiemer, (eds.), pp. 38–63.Google Scholar

Nesselrath, T. 2013. Kaiser Julian und die Repaganisierung des Reiches. Konzept und Vorbilder. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar

Niccolai, L. 2017a. ‘Julian, Plutarch, and the Dangers of Self-Praise’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 57: 1058–84.Google Scholar

Niccolai, L. 2017b. ‘“Avrei potuto punirti, ma ho preferito scriverti”: regole della politica e regole della satira tra Contro Nilo e Misopogon’, Athenaeum 105: 601–20.Google Scholar

Niccolai, L. 2019. ‘The “House of Hesychius” and the Religious Allegiance of Synesius’ Family’, Historia 68: 368–85.Google Scholar

Niccolai, L. 2021. ‘Synesius of Cyrene, Sophist-Bishop: Rhetoric and Religion in the Greek East at the Turn of the Fifth Century CE’, Rhetorica 39: 209–33.Google Scholar

Niccolai, L. 2023. ‘Julian the Emperor and the Reaction against Christianity: A Case Study of Resistance from the Top’, in Elsner, J. and Jolowicz, D. (eds.), Articulating Resistance under the Roman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 219–238.Google Scholar

Nicolosi, S. 1959. Il De providentia di Sinesio: studio critico e tradizione. Padua: CEDAM.Google Scholar

Niehoff, M. 2011. Jewish Exegesis and Homeric Scholarship in Alexandria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nixon, C. E. W. 1983. ‘Latin Panegyrics of the Tetrarchic and Constantinian Periods’, in Croke, B. and Emmett, E. M. (eds.), History and Historians in Late Antiquity. Sydney; Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 88–99.Google Scholar

Nixon, C. E. V., Rodgers, B. S., and Mynors, R. A. B.. 1994. In Praise of Later Roman Emperors: The Panegyrici Latini. Introduction, Translation and Historical Commentary. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Nock, A.B. 1926. Sallustius: Concerning the Gods and Universe. Edited with prolegomena and translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nongbri, B. 2008. ‘Dislodging “Embedded” Religion: A Brief Note on a Scholarly Trope’, Numen 55: 440–60.Google Scholar

Nongbri, B. 2013. Before Religion: A History of a Modern Concept. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Noreña, C. 2001. ‘The Communication of the Emperor’s Virtues’, Journal of Roman Studies 91: 146–58.Google Scholar

Norman, A. F. 1969. Libanius. Selected Orations, vol. 1. London; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Norman, A. F. 1977. Libanius. Selected orations, vol. 2. London; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Norman, A. F. 1992. Autobiography and Selected Letters. London; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Odahl, C. M. 2010. Constantine and the Christian Empire. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. J. 2005. Platonopolis: Platonic Political Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. J. 2014. ‘Political Theory’, in Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 471–81.Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. J. 2017. ‘Plato’s Political Dialogues in the Writings of Julian the Emperor’, in Tarrant, H. et al. (eds.), The Brill Companion for the Reception of Plato in Antiquity. Leiden; Boston: Brill, pp. 400–11.Google Scholar

Omissi, A. 2018. Emperors and Usurpers in the Later Roman Empire: Civil War, Panegyric, and the Construction of Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Omissi, A. 2020. ‘Civil War and the Late Roman Panegyrical Corpus’, in Omissi, and Ross, (eds.), pp. 211–31.Google Scholar

Omissi, A., and Ross, A. J. (eds.) 2020. Imperial Panegyric from Diocletian to Honorius. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar

Op de Coul, M. 2012. ‘Aspects of Paideia in Synesius’ Dion’, in Seng, and Hoffman, (eds.), pp. 110–24.Google Scholar