Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:25:51.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - India, China and foreign investment

from PART I - China, India and the global trade system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2011

By
Muthucumaraswamy Sornarajah
Edited by
Muthucumaraswamy Sornarajah  and
Jiangyu Wang
Muthucumaraswamy Sornarajah
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Muthucumaraswamy Sornarajah
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Jiangyu Wang
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Get access

Summary

The announcement of open door policies in Asia have largely applied to foreign investment as they preceded liberalization in the area of trade. China announced its open door policy in 1979 and India set in train less stringent foreign investment controls in 1992. Both events occurred well before the establishment of the World Trade Organization in 1995. To this extent, the developments as to liberalization in the area of foreign investment preceded those in international trade. The move towards free markets showed an ascendancy with the emergence of Thatcherism and Reagonomics and the fall of the Soviet Union, which removed a powerful competing model from the scene. Many factors at the time favoured liberalization of the foreign investment regime. The loans crisis arising from the circulation of petro-dollars had led to the drying up of private funds. Aid had become non existent. The states of Eastern Europe, released from Soviet hold and adopting free market economics, increased competition for the only means of private capital, the investments of multinational corporations. The situation was ripe for liberalization on a global scale. But, though individual countries did show fervour for the adoption of the liberalization model in their foreign investment policies, at the global level, the trend towards globalization has not resulted in global rules on foreign investment. With economic crises in Asia, Russia and Argentina, there has been some rethinking on the value of liberalization of foreign investment regimes.

Type
Chapter
Information
China, India and the International Economic Order , pp. 132 - 166
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, , Gregory, , Commodity and Propriety: Competing Visions of Property in American Legal Thought (University of Chicago Press, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, , Mark, B., ‘Awakening the sleeping giant: India and foreign direct investment in the 21st century’ (2005) 15 Indiana Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 389
Vicki, Bean and Joel, Beauvais, ‘The global fifth amendment: NAFTA's Investment protection and the misguided quest for an international “regulatory takings” doctrine’ (2003) 78 NYULR 30
Ha-Joon, Chang, Bad Samaritans: Rich Nations, Poor Policies and the Threat to the Developing World (London: Random House, 2007)Google Scholar
Ha-Joon, Chang, Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective (London: Anthem Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Aron, Chaze, India: An Investor's Guide to the Next Economic Superpower (Singapore: John Wiley, 2006)Google Scholar
Huiping, CHEN, in Niewenhuys, (ed.), The Multilateral Agreement on Investment (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2001)Google Scholar
George, Coedès, The Indianized States of South East Asia (Honolulu: East–West Center Press, 1968)Google Scholar
George, Coedès, ‘A direct instance of that cooperation is the joint bid for oil in Kazakhstan’, Straits Times, Singapore, 9 June 2006
Investment Treaty News, 2 March 2007, available at http://www.iisd.org/pdf/ 2007/itn_mar2_2007.pdf
Kelsey, JaneServing Whose Interests? The Political Economy of Trade in Services Agreements (London: Routledge, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagesh, Kumar, India's Emerging Multinationals (London: Routledge, 2007)Google Scholar
Haitian, LU, ‘Migration of dirty industries in China’, Ph.D. thesis, National University of Singapore, 2006Google Scholar
Jennifer, Nedelsky, Private Property and the Limits of American Constitutionalism (University of Chicago Press, 1990)Google Scholar
,OECD, Investment Policy Review, China: Progress and Reform Challenges (2003)
Kingley, Ong and Colin, Baxter, ‘A comparative study of the fundamental elements of Chinese and English company law’ (1999) 48 ICLQ 88
Randall, Peerenboom, ‘Competing conception of the rule of law in China’, in Randall Peerenbohm (ed.), Asian Discourses on the Rule of Law, p. 112
Peerenbohm, Randall, ‘Let one hundred flowers bloom, one hundred schools contend: Debating rule of law in China’ (2002) 23 Mich. J. Int'l L. 471; Randall Peerenboom, China Modernizes (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
Louis, Putterman, ‘The right to property in China: Shifting and unbundling ownership’ (1996) Economic Reform Today
Aswini, Ray, ‘Globalization and democratic governance: The Indian Experience’, in Catarina, Kinnvall and Kristina, Jonsson (eds.), Democratization in Asia: The Construction of Identity (London: Routledge, 2002)Google Scholar
Rohit, Sachdev, ‘Comparing the Legal Foundations of Foreign Investment in India and China’ (2006) Columbia Bus. Law Rev. 167Google Scholar
Sachs, , Jeffrey, D. and Nirupam, Bajpai, ‘Foreign direct investment in India: Issues and problems 5–8’ (Harvard Inst. for Int'l Dev., Discussion Paper No. 759, 2000), available at http://www2.cid.harvard.edu/india/pdfs/759.pdf
Karl, Sauvant, ‘New sources of FDI: The BRICs, outward FDI from Brazil, Russia, India and China’ (2005) 5 Journal of World Trade 2005Google Scholar
Swee-Hock, SAW (ed.), ASEAN–China Relations: Realities and Prospects (ISEAS, 2005)
Scheiderman, David, ‘Property rights and regulatory innovation: Comparing constitutional cultures’ (2006) 4 I-CONGoogle Scholar
Amartya, Sen, The Argumentative Indian (London: Allen Lane, 2005)Google Scholar
Wenhua, SHAN, The Legal Framework of EU–China Investment Relations (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2005)Google Scholar
Wenhua, SHAN, ‘Towards a level playing field for foreign investment in China’ (2002) 3 Journal of World Investment and Trade327Google Scholar
Danyang, SHEN, ‘ASEAN–China FTA: Opportunities, modalities and prospects’, in SAW Swee-Hock (ed.), ASEAN–China Relations
David, Smith, The Dragon and the Elephant: China, India and the New World Order (London: Profile Books, 2007)Google Scholar
Sornarajah, M., ‘A coming crisis: Expansionary interpretations in investment treaty arbitrations’ paper delivered at the Columbia-Sorborne Conference on Investment Treaty Arbitration, 4 April 2006
Sornarajah, M., ‘A law for need or a law for greed? restoring the lost law in international foreign investment law’ Keynote Address at the Van Moltke Symposium at the University of Amsterdam, February, 2006 (to be published in International Agreements)
Sornarajah, M., ‘The international law on foreign investment in the age of globalization’ (2002) 12 Canadian Foreign Affairs202Google Scholar
Sornarajah, M., ‘Towards an international antitrust law’ (1984) Indian Journal of International Law 22Google Scholar
Laura, Underkuffler, The Idea of Property: Its Meaning and Power (Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Harten, Gus, Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law (London: Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
Harten, Gus and Martin, Loughlin, ‘Investment treaty arbitration as a species of global administrative law’ (2006) 17 European JIL121Google Scholar
Jiangyu, WANG, ‘Financial liberalization and regulation in East Asia: Lessons from financial crises and the Chinese experience of controlled liberalization’ (2007) 41(1) Journal of World Trade211Google Scholar
Wells, Louis T. and Ahmed, Rafiq, Making Foreign Investment Safe (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jinsong, YU, ‘Pre-establishment national treatment of foreign investment and China's countermeasures’, in Henry, Gao and Donald, Lewis (eds.), China's Participation in the WTO (London: Cameron May, 2005)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×