Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:41:24.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Small Classes in the Early Grades: One Policy, Multiple Outcomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Jeremy D. Finn ,
Allison E. Suriani  and
Charles M. Achilles
Edited by
Arthur J. Reynolds ,
Arthur J. Rolnick ,
Michelle M. Englund  and
Judy A. Temple
Arthur J. Reynolds
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Arthur J. Rolnick
Affiliation:
Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis
Michelle M. Englund
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Judy A. Temple
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access

Summary

The idea that small classes are desirable for instruction is not new; indeed, it dates back at least to biblical times (Angrist & Lavy, 1996). In the 20th and 21st centuries, small classes, a distinguishing feature of American private schools and a fundamental component of all remedial programs, have been posited as a way to bolster student achievement in public schools generally.

Tennessee's Project STAR (Student Teacher Achievement Ratio) is not a “program” in the traditional sense. It was a large-scale experiment to test the effectiveness of this basic principle of school organization – that is, arranging classes in the early grades so they have a relatively small number of students in a classroom with a full-time teacher.

Because of the reported effectiveness of small classes in STAR, the experiment has been followed by class size reduction (CSR) initiatives across the country. According to one recent survey, 33 states had statewide CSR programs for the early grades, of which 13 were mandatory (McCabe, 2006). The number of districts with their own CSR programs is undocumented but probably quite large. President Clinton introduced a nationwide CSR program in 1998, which was discontinued by the Bush administration.

STAR has also been followed by additional research on small classes, by several analyses of CSR costs and benefits, and by some arguments that the research on CSR or the conclusions drawn from the research is faulty. This chapter summarizes these developments.

Type
Chapter
Information
Childhood Programs and Practices in the First Decade of Life
A Human Capital Integration
 , pp. 287 - 308
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achilles, C. M. (1999). Let's put kids first, finally: Getting class size right. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
Achilles, C. M. (2005). Financing class size reduction. Greensboro, NC: University of North Carolina at Greensboro School of Education, Southeast Regional Educational Laboratory (SERVE).Google Scholar
Achilles, C. M., Harman, P., & Egelson, P. (1995). Using research results of class size to improve achievement outcomes. Research in the Schools, 2, 23–30.Google Scholar
Achilles, C. M., Kiser-Kling, K., Aust, A., & Owen, J. (1995). A study of reduced class size in primary grades of a fully Chapter-I eligible school: Success starts small. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Achilles, C. M., Nye, B. A., & Zaharias, J. B. (1995). Policy use of research results: Tennessee's Project Challenge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Angrist, J. D., & Lavy, V. (1996). Using Maimonides' rule to estimate the effect of class size on children's academic achievement. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 533–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biddle, B. J., & Berliner, D. C. (2002). Small class size and its effects. Educational Leadership, 59(5), 12–23.Google Scholar
Blatchford, P. (2003). A systematic observational study of teachers' and pupils' behaviour in large and small classes. Learning and Instruction, 13, 569–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohrnstedt, G. W., & Stecher, B. M. (Eds.). (1999). Class size reduction in California: Early evaluation findings, 1996–1998 (CSR Research Consortium, Year 1 Evaluation Report). Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.Google Scholar
Bonczar, T. P. (2003). Prevalence of imprisonment in the U.S. population, 1974–2001 (Special Report, NCJ 197976). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
Boozer, M., & Rouse, C. (2001). Intra-school variation in class size: Patterns and implications. Journal of Urban Economics, 50, 163–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourke, S. (1986). How smaller is better: Some relationships between class size, teaching practices, and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 558–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd-Zaharias, J., & Pate-Bain, H. (1998). Teacher aides and student learning: Lessons from Project STAR. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.Google Scholar
Brewer, D., Krop, C., Gill, B. P., & Reichardt, R. (1999). Estimating the costs of national class-size reductions under different policy alternatives. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carneiro, P., & Heckman, J. J. (2003). Human capital policy. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 9495. Retrieved from http://papers.nber.org/papers/w9495.Google Scholar
Cruickshank, D. R. (1980). Teaching is tough. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
,CSR Research Consortium (2000). Class size reduction in California: The 1998–1999 evaluation findings. Sacramento: California Department of Education.Google Scholar
Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Teachers and teaching: Testing policy hypotheses from a National Commission Report. Educational Researcher, 27, 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egelson, P., Harmon, P., Hood, A., & Achilles, C. M. (2005). How class size makes a difference. Greensboro, NC: University of North Carolina at Greensboro School of Education, Southeast Regional Educational Laboratory (SERVE).Google Scholar
Ehrenberg, R. G., Brewer, D. J., Gamoran, A., & Willms, J. D. (2001a). Class size and student achievement. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehrenberg, R. G., Brewer, D. J., Gamoran, A., & Willms, J. D. (2001b). Does class size matter?Scientific American, 385(5), 32–40.Google Scholar
Evertson, C. M., & Folger, J. K. (1989). Small class, large class: What do teachers do differently? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Ferguson, R. F., & Ladd, H. F. (1996). How and why money matters: An analysis of Alabama schools. In Ladd, H. F. (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education (pp. 265–298). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Finn, J. D. (2002). Small classes in American schools: Research, practice, and politics. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 551–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn, J. D., & Achilles, C. A. (1990). Answers and questions about class size: A statewide experiment. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 557–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn, J. D., Boyd-Zaharias, J., Fish, R. M., & Gerber, S. B. (2007). Project STAR and beyond: Database user's guide. Lebanon, TN: HEROS, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.heros-inc.org/data.htm.Google Scholar
Finn, J. D., Folger, J., & Cox, D. (1991). Measuring participation among elementary grade students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 393–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn, J. D., Forden, M. A., Verdinelli, S., & Pannozzo, G. M. (2001). Evaluation of the class size reduction initiative – Buffalo Public Schools. Buffalo, NY: University at Buffalo, Graduate School of Education.Google Scholar
Finn, J. D., Fox, J. D., McClellan, M., Achilles, C. M., & Boyd-Zaharias, J. (2006). Small classes in the early grades and course taking in high school. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 1, 1–13. Retrieved from http://www.ijepl.org.Google Scholar
Finn, J. D., Gerber, S. B., & Achilles, C. A. (2000). Teacher aides: An alternative to small classes? In M. C. Wang & J. D. Finn (Eds.), How small classes help teachers do their best (pp. 131–173). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Center for Research on Human Development and Education and the U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
Finn, J. D., Gerber, S. B., Achilles, C. M., & Boyd-Zaharias, J. (2001). The enduring effects of small classes. Teachers College Record, 103, 145–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn, J. D., Gerber, S. B., & Boyd-Zaharias, J. (2005). Small classes in the early grades, academic achievement, and graduating from high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 214–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finn, J. D., Pannozzo, G. M., & Achilles, C. M. (2003). The “why's” of class size: Student behavior in small classes. Review of Educational Research, 73, 321–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, S. B., Finn, J. D., Achilles, C. M., & Boyd-Zaharias, J. (2001). Teacher aides and students' academic achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldschmidt, P., & Wang, J. (1999). When can schools affect dropout behavior? A longitudinal multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 715–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, H., & Blatchford, P. (1998). Class size and educational achievement: A review of methodology with particular reference to study design. British Educational Research Journal, 24, 255–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanushek, E. A. (1989). The impact of differential expenditures on school performance. Educational Researcher, 18(4), 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanushek, E. A. (1998). The evidence on class size. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester, W. Allen Wallis Institute of Political Economy.Google Scholar
Hanushek, E. A. (1999). Some findings from an independent investigation of the Tennessee STAR experiment and from other investigations of class-size effects. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 143–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, J. J. (2006, January 10). Catch ‘em young. Wall Street Journal, p. A14.
Hedges, L. V., & Greenwald, R. (1996). Have times changed? The relationship between school resources and student performance. In Burtless, G. (Ed.), Does money matter? The effect of school resources on student achievement and adult success (pp. 74–92). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Hedges, L. V., Laine, R. D., & Greenwald, R. (1994). Does money matter? A meta-analysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcomes. Educational Researcher, 23(3), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedges, L. V., Nye, B., & Konstantopoulos, S. (1999). The long-term effects of small classes: A five-year follow-up of the Tennessee class-size experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 127–142.Google Scholar
Hedges, L. V., Nye, B., & Konstantopoulos, S. (2000). The effects of small classes on achievement: The results of the Tennessee class-size experiment. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 123–151.Google Scholar
Hedges, L. V., Nye, B., & Konstantopoulos, S. (2004). Do minorities experience greater lasting benefits from small classes? Evidence from a five-year follow up of the Tennessee class-size experiment. Journal of Educational Research, 97, 94–100.Google Scholar
Howell, W. C., West, M. R., & Peterson, P. (2007). What Americans think about their schools: The 2007 Education Next – PEPG survey. Education Next, 7(4), 13–26.Google Scholar
Johnston, J. M. (1990). What are teachers' perceptions of teaching in different classroom contexts? (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 320 867). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.Google Scholar
Kaufman, P., & Bradby, D. (1992). Characteristics of at-risk students in NELS:88 (National Center for Education Statistics Report No. 92–042). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
Kiser-Kling, K. (1995). A comparative study of life in first grade classrooms of 1:14 and 1:23 teacher-pupil ratios. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Greensboro.Google Scholar
Krueger, A. B. (1999). Experimental estimates of education production functions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 497–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, A. B. (2003). Economic considerations and class size. Economic Journal, 113, 34–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, A. B., & Whitmore, D. M. (2001). The effect of attending a small class in the early grades on college-test taking and middle-school test results: Evidence from project STAR. Economic Journal, 111, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, H., Belfield, C., Muennig, P., & Rouse, C. (2007). The costs and benefits of an excellent education for all of America's children. Retrieved from the Columbia University website: http://www.cbcse.org/media/download_gallery/.
Lewit, E. M., & Baker, L. S. (1997). Class size. Future of Children, 7, 112–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCabe, M. (2006, January 4). State of the states. Education Week, 26(17), 72–76.Google Scholar
Milchus, N., Farrah, G., & Reitz, W. (1968). The self-concept and motivation inventory: What face would you wear?Dearborn Heights, MI: Person-0-Metrics.Google Scholar
Miles, K. H. (1995). Freeing resources for improving schools: A case study of teacher allocation in Boston Public Schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analyses, 17, 476–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molnar, A., Smith, O., & Zahorik, J. (1999). 1998–99 evaluation results of the Student Achievement Guarantee in Education (SAGE) program. Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin School of Education.Google Scholar
Molnar, A., Smith, O., Zahorik, J., Ehrle, K., Halback, A., & Kuehl, B. (2000). 1999–2000 evaluation results of the Student Achievement Guarantee in Education (SAGE) program. Milwaukee: University of Wisconsin School of Education.Google Scholar
Mosteller, F. (1995). The Tennessee study of class size in the early school grades. Future of Children, 5, 113–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muennig, P., & Woolf, S. H. (2007). Health and economic benefits of reducing the number of students per classroom in US primary schools. American Journal of Public Health, 97(11), 2020–2027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neal, D., & Johnson, J. (1996). The role of premarket factors in black-white wage differentials. Journal of Political Economy, 104, 869–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,NICHD Early Child Care Research Network (2004). Does class size in first grade relate to children's academic and social performance or observed classroom processes?Developmental Psychology, 40, 651–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramey, C. T., & Ramey, S. L. (1998). Early intervention and early experience. American Psychologist, 53, 109–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritter, G. W., & Boruch, R. F. (1999). The political and institutional origins of a randomized controlled trial on elementary school class size: Tennessee Project STAR. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21, 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumberger, R. W. (1995). Dropping out of middle school: A multilevel analysis of students and schools. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 583–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarason, S. B. (1974). The psychological sense of community: Prospects for a community psychology. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Schanzenbach, D. W. (2006). What have researchers learned from Project STAR? Brookings Papers on Education Policy, 2006–2007, 205–228.
Schwager, M. T., Mitchell, D. E., Mitchell, T. K., & Hecht, J. B. (1992). How school district policy influences grade-level retention in elementary schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14, 421–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapson, S. M., Eason, G., Wright, E. N., & Fitzgerald, J. (1980). An experimental study of the effects of class size. American Educational Research Journal, 17, 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, L. A., & Smith, M. L. (1990). Synthesis of research on grade retention. Educational Leadership, 47(8), 84–88.Google Scholar
Voelkl, K. E. (1996). Measuring students' identification with school. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 760–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walston, J., West, J., & Rathbun, A. (2002). Kindergarten program features and gains in reading and mathematics achievement of public school children: Class size, length of school day and classroom aides. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
Wang, M. C., & Finn, J. D. (Eds.). (2000). How small classes help teachers do their best. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Center for Research on Human Development and Education and the U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
Word, E., Johnston, J., Bain, H. P., Fulton, D. B., Boyd-Zaharias, J., Lintz, M. N.. (1990). Final report: Student/teacher achievement ratio (STAR): Tennessee's K–3 class-size study. Nashville: Tennessee State Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.heros-inc.org.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×