Book contents
- Celsus in his World
- Celsus in his World
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- 1 Of Scholarship, Piety and Community
- 2 Annotations on the Literary Structure of Celsus’ Alēthēs Logos
- 3 Celsus As Platonist Philosopher
- 4 Celsus’ Theology
- 5 Origen’s Celsus and Imperial Greek Religiosity
- 6 Celsus, or Philosophy and the Second Sophistic
- 7 Homer in Origen, Against Celsus
- 8 The Gospel according to Celsus
- 9 The Reception of the Alēthēs Logos
- 10 Celsus’ Judaism
- 11 The Multiple Personalities of Celsus’ Jew
- 12 Afterword
- Bibliography
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 November 2021
Book contents
- Celsus in his World
- Celsus in his World
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- 1 Of Scholarship, Piety and Community
- 2 Annotations on the Literary Structure of Celsus’ Alēthēs Logos
- 3 Celsus As Platonist Philosopher
- 4 Celsus’ Theology
- 5 Origen’s Celsus and Imperial Greek Religiosity
- 6 Celsus, or Philosophy and the Second Sophistic
- 7 Homer in Origen, Against Celsus
- 8 The Gospel according to Celsus
- 9 The Reception of the Alēthēs Logos
- 10 Celsus’ Judaism
- 11 The Multiple Personalities of Celsus’ Jew
- 12 Afterword
- Bibliography
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Celsus in his WorldPhilosophy, Polemic and Religion in the Second Century, pp. 415 - 439Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Adams, Edward (2009). ‘First-Century Models for Paul’s Churches: Selected Scholarly Developments since Meeks’, in Still, Todd and Horrell, David (eds.), After the First Urban Christians: The Social‐Scientific Study of Pauline Christianity Twenty‐Five Years Later (London: T&T Clark), 60–78.Google Scholar
Aitken, James K. (2020). ‘Homeric Rewriting in Greek Sirach’, Vetus Testamentum 69, 1–32.Google Scholar
Alexander, Loveday (1994). ‘Paul and the Hellenistic Schools: The Evidence of Galen’, in Pedersen, Troels Engberg (ed.), Paul in His Hellenistic Context (Edinburgh: T&T Clark), 60–83.Google Scholar
Alexander, Loveday (2001). ‘IPSE DIXIT: Citation of Authority in Paul and in the Jewish and Hellenistic Schools’, in Engberg-Pedersen, Troels (ed.), Paul beyond the Judaism/Hellenism Divide (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox), 103–28.Google Scholar
Alexander, Loveday (2005). ‘The Four among Pagans’, in Bockmuehl, M. and Hagner, D. (eds.), The Written Gospel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 222–37.Google Scholar
Alexander, Philip (1973). ‘Incantations and Books of Magic’, in Schürer, Emil, The History of the Jewish People in the Age of Jesus Christ, rev. and ed. Vermes, Geza, Millar, Fergus and Goodman, Martin, vol. III.1 (Edinburgh: T&T Clark), 357–58.Google Scholar
Alexander, Philip (1983). ‘3 Enoch’, in Charlesworth, J. H. (ed.), The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, vol. 1 (London: Darton, Longman & Todd), 223–316.Google Scholar
Alexander, Philip (1984). ‘Comparing Merkavah Mysticism and Gnosticism: An Essay in Method’, Journal of Jewish Studies 35, 1–18.Google Scholar
Alexander, Philip (1992). ‘The Fall into Knowledge: The Garden of Eden/Paradise in Gnostic Literature’, in Morris, Paul and Sawyer, Deborah (eds.), A Walk in the Garden: Biblical, Iconographic and Literary Images of Eden (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press), 91–104.Google Scholar
Alexander, Philip (1999). ‘Jewish Elements in Gnosticism and Magic, c. CE 70 – c. CE 270’, in Horbury, William, Davies, W. D. and Sturdy, John (eds.), The Cambridge History of Judaism, vol. 3 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1052–78.Google Scholar
Alexander, Philip (2015). ‘Rabbinic and Patristic Bible Exegesis As Intertexts: Towards a Theory of Comparative Midrash’, in McLay, Timothy (ed.), The Temple in Text and Tradition (London: Bloomsbury), 71–97.Google Scholar
Alexander, Philip (2016). ‘“The Agent of the King Is Treated As the King Himself”: Does the Worship of Jesus Imply His Divinity?’, in Gurtner, Daniel M., Macaskill, Grant and Pennington, Jonathan T. (eds.), Essays on Christology, Creation, and Eschatology in Honor of Richard Bauckham (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans), 97–114.Google Scholar
Alexander, Philip (2017). ‘The Heavenly World in Relation to Human Prayer and Service from a Rabbinic Perspective’, in Frey, Jörg and Jost, Michael R. (eds.), Gottesdienst und Engel im antiken Judentum und frühen Christentum (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), 167–84.Google Scholar
Alexander, Philip (2018). ‘Narrative and Counter-Narrative: The Jewish Anti-Gospel (The Toledot Yeshu) and the Christian Gospels’, in Baron, Lori, Hicks-Keeton, Jill and Thiessen, Matthew (eds.), The Ways That Often Parted: Essays in Honor of Joel Marcus (Atlanta, GA: SBL Press), 377–402.Google Scholar
Alexander, Philip (2019). ‘The Aramaic Bible in the East’, Aramaic Studies 17, 39–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Philip (2020). ‘Types of Jewish Anti-Christian Polemic in Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages, and Their Historical-Social Setting’, in Morlet, Sébastien (ed.), Jewish–Christian Disputations in Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages (Leuven: Peeters).Google Scholar
Algra, Keimpe (2007). Conceptions and Images: Hellenistic Philosophical Theology and Traditional Religion (Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen).Google Scholar
Anderson, Graham (1995). Sage, Saint and Sophist: Holy Men and their Associates in the Early Roman Empire (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Ando, Clifford (1996). ‘Pagan Apologetics and Christian Intolerance in the Ages of Themistius and Augustine’, JECS 4, 171–207.Google Scholar
Ando, Clifford (2013). ‘Subjects, Gods, and Empire, or Monarchism As a Theological Problem’, in Rüpke, Jörg (ed.), The Individual in the Religions of the Ancient Mediterranean (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrade, Nathanael J. (2013). Syrian Identity in the Greco-Roman World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Andresen, Carl (1955). Logos und Nomos. Die Polemik des Kelsos wider das Christentum (Berlin: AKG).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous, (1836). De Celso philosopho disputatur et fragmenta libri, quem contra Christianos edidit, colliguntur (Regiomonti [Königsberg).Google Scholar
Arena, Valentina (2007). ‘Roman Oratorical Invective’, in Dominik, William and Hall, Jon (eds.), A Companion to Roman Rhetoric (Oxford: Blackwell), 149–59.Google Scholar
Arnold, Johannes (2010). ‘Textkritisches zu Origenesʼ Contra Celsum’, VigChr 64, 54–73.Google Scholar
Arnold, Johannes (2011). ‘Unordnung, bedingt durch Hass? Origenes und die Struktur von Celsusʼ Alethes Logos’, in Kaczmarek, Sylwia and Pietras, Henryk (eds.), Origeniana Decima: Origen As Writer (Leuven/Paris/Walpole, MA: Peeters), 267–80.Google Scholar
Arnold, Johannes (2016). Der Wahre Logos des Kelsos: Eine Strukturanalyse (Münster: Aschendorff).Google Scholar
Arruzza, Cinzia (2012). ‘Plato’s World-Maker in Origen’s Contra Celsum’, Horizons 3, 61–80.Google Scholar
Aune, David and Young, Robin Darling (eds.) (2014). Reading Religions in the Ancient World: Essays Presented to Robert McQueen Grant on His 90th Birthday (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Ayres, Lewis (2015). ‘Irenaeus vs the Valentinians: Toward a Rethinking of Patristic Exegetical Origins’, JECS 23, 153–87.Google Scholar
Ayres, Lewis (2017). ‘Continuity and Change in Second Century Christianity: A Narrative against the Trend’, in Carleton Paget and Lieu (2017), 106–21.Google Scholar
Bammel, Ernst (1968). ‘Origen Contra Celsum i.41 and the Jewish Tradition’, JTS NS 19, 211–13.Google Scholar
Bammel, Ernst (1986). ‘Der Jude des Celsus’, in Ernst Bammel, Judaica. Kleine Schriften, vol. 1 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), 265–83.Google Scholar
Barbu, Daniel (2018). ‘L’Évangile selon les Juifs: à propos de quelques témoignages anciens’, Anabases 28, 157–80.Google Scholar
Barclay, John M. G. (2013). ‘“Jews” and “Christians” in the Eyes of Roman Authors’, in Schwartz, Joshua and Tomson, Peter (eds.), Jews and Christians in the First and Second Centuries: How to Write their History (Leiden: Brill), 313–26.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Albert I. (2013). ‘The Rule of the Martian in the Ancient Diaspora: Celsus and His Jew’, in Schwartz, Joshua and Tomson, Peter (eds.), Jews and Christians in the First and Second Centuries: How to Write Their History (Leiden: Brill), 398–430.Google Scholar
Beatrice, Pier Franco (1991). ‘Le traité de Porphyre contre les Chrétiens. L’état de la question’, Kernos 4, 119–38.Google Scholar
Beatrice, Pier Franco (1992). ‘Towards a New Edition of Porphyry’s Fragments Against the Christians’, in Goulet-Cazé, M.-O., Madec, G. and O’Brien, D. (eds.), Σοφίης μαιήτορες, Chercheurs de sagesse. Hommage à Jean Pépin (Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes).Google Scholar
Beatrice, Pier Franco (1993). ‘Antistes Philosophiae: Ein christenfeindlicher Propagandist am Hofe Diokletians nach dem Zeugnis des Laktanz’, Augustinianum 33, 31–47.Google Scholar
Beatrice, Pier Franco (1994). ‘On the Title of Porphyry’s Treatise against the Christians’, in Gasparro, Giulia Sfameni (ed.), Ἀγαθὴ ἐλπίς: Studi storico-religiosi in onore di Ugo Bianchi (Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider), 221–35.Google Scholar
Becker, Adam and Reed, Annette Yoshiko (eds.) (2003). The Ways That Never Parted: Jews and Christians in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).Google Scholar
Becker, Matthias (2016). Porphyrios, Contra Christianos. Neue Sammlung der Fragmente, Testimonien und Dubia mit Einleitung, Übersetzung und Anmerkungen (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Behr, Charles A. (1981). Aelius Aristides. The Complete Works, vol. 2 (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Bell, Catherine (1987). ‘Discourse and Dichotomies: The Structure of Ritual Theory’, Religion 17, 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betz, Hans Dieter (1975). Plutarch’s Theological Writings and Early Christian Literature (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Betz, Hans Dieter (1992). The Greek Magical Papyri in Translation, including the Demotic Spells, vol. 1: Texts. 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Blumell, Lincoln (2007). ‘A Jew in Celsus’ True Doctrine? An Examination of Jewish Anti-Christian Polemic in the Second Century C.E.’, Studies in Religion / Sciences Religeuses 36, 297–315.Google Scholar
Bohak, Gideon (2008). Ancient Jewish Magic: A History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Borret, Marcel (1967–76). Origène, Contre Celse. Introduction, texte critique, traduction et notes, 5 vols. (Paris: Cerf).Google Scholar
Boudon-Millot, V. (2015). ‘Le Moïse de Galien: Une figure de l’irrationnel’, in Aigle, D. and Briquel Chatonnet, F. (eds.), Figures de Moïse (Paris: Editions de Boccard), 133–44.Google Scholar
Bouffartigue, Jean (1992). L’empereur Julien et la culture de son temps (Paris: Institut d’Etudes Augustiniennes).Google Scholar
Bouffartigue, Jean (2011). ‘Porphyre et Julien contre les chrétiens: intentions, motifs et méthodes de leurs écrits’, in Morlet, S. (ed.), Le traité de Porphyre contre les chrétiens: Un siècle de recherches, nouvelles questions (Paris: Institut d’Etudes Augustiniennes), 407–26.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile (2014). ‘Le Contre les Galiléens de l’empereur Julien répond-il au Contre Celse d’Origène?’, in Amato, Eugenio (ed.), Ἐν καλοῖς κοινοπραγία. Hommages à la mémoire de Pierre-Louis Malosse et Jean Bouffartigue (Nantes: Association Textes pour l’histoire de l’Antiquité tardive), 103–28.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Marie-Odile (2016). Cyrille d’Alexandrie, Contre Julien, t. II, livres 3–4 (Paris: Cerf).Google Scholar
Bovon, François and Duffy, John M. (2012). ‘A New Greek Fragment from Ariston of Pella’s Dialogue of Jason and Papiscus’, Harvard Theological Review 105, 457–65.Google Scholar
Bowersock, Glen (1990). Hellenism in Late Antiquity (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar
Boyarin, Daniel (1999). Dying for God: Martyrdom and the Making of Christianity and Judaism (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Boyarin, Daniel (2004). Border-lines: The Partition of Judaeo-Christianity (Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press).Google Scholar
Boyarin, Daniel (2013). ‘Is Metatron a Converted Christian?’, Judaïsme Ancien / Ancient Judaism 1, 13–62.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, George (2001). Post-Hellenistic Philosophy: A Study of its Development from the Stoics to Origen (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, George (2011). ‘Time, Creation and the Mind of God: The Afterlife of a Platonist Theory in Origen’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 40, 319–37.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, George (2018a). Platonist Philosophy 80 BC to AD 250: An Introduction and Collection of Sources in Translation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, George (2018b). ‘Numenius on Intellect, Soul, and the Authority of Plato’, in Bryan, Jennifer, Wardy, Robert and Warren, James (eds.), Authors and Authorities in Ancient Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 184–201.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, George (2021). ‘Begotten and Made: Creation As Cosmogony in Middle Platonism’, in Salles, R. (ed.), Cosmology and Biology in Ancient Philosophy: From Thales to Avicenna (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 85–100.Google Scholar
Bregman, Jay (1982). Synesius of Cyrene: Philosopher-Bishop (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Brisson, Luc (1999). ‘The Platonic Background in the Apocalypse of Zostrianos: Numenius and Letter II attributed to Plato’, in O’Cleary, J. J. (ed.), Traditions of Platonism: Essays in Honour of John Dillon (Aldershot/Brookfield, VT: Ashgate), 173–88.Google Scholar
Buffière, F. (1956). Les mythes d’Homère et la pensée grecque (Paris: Belles Lettres).Google Scholar
Butbul, Sagit and Alexander, Philip (2013). ‘Rylands Gaster Heb. Ms. 1623/3 and the Qiṣṣat Mujādalat al-Usquf’, in Smithuis, Renate and Alexander, Philip (eds.), From Cairo to Manchester: Studies in the Rylands Genizah Fragments (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 249–89.Google Scholar
Caird, G. B. (1956). Principalities and Powers: A Study of Pauline Theology (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Carleton Paget, James (2010). ‘The Enigma of the Second Century’, in James Carleton Paget, Jews, Christians, and Jewish Christians (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), 383–425.Google Scholar
Carleton Paget, James (2017). ‘The Jew of Celsus and adversus Judaeos literature’, ZAC 21, 201–42.Google Scholar
Carleton Paget, James (2019). ‘Celsus’ Jew and Jewish Anti-Christian Counter-Narrative: Evidence of an Important Form of Polemic in Jewish–Christian Disputation’, in van Kooten, George and van Ruiten, Jacques (eds.), Intolerance, Polemics, and Debate in Antiquity: Politico-Cultural, Philosophical, and Religious Forms of Critical Conversation (Leiden/Boston, MA: Brill), 387–423.Google Scholar
Carleton Paget, James and Lieu, Judith (eds.) (2017). Christianity in the Second Century: Themes and Developments (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Carrara, Paolo (1984). I pagani di fronte al cristianesimo (Bologna: Edizioni Dehoniane).Google Scholar
Chadwick, Henry (1948). ‘Origen, Celsus, and the Resurrection of the Body’, HTR 41, 83–102.Google Scholar
Chadwick, Henry (1965). Origen, Contra Celsum. Corrected edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Chadwick, Henry (1966). Early Christian Thought and the Classical Tradition (New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Chadwick, Henry (1983). ‘The Gospel As Republication of Natural Religion in Justin Martyr’, ICS 18, 237–47.Google Scholar
Champeaux, Jacqueline (2007). Arnobe. Contre les Gentils, livre III (Paris: Belles Lettres).Google Scholar
Chase, Michael (tr.) (2003). Simplicius: On Aristotle, Categories 1–4 (London: Duckworth).Google Scholar
Cherniss, Harold (1976). Plutarch, Moralia. Volume XIII: Part 2 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard).Google Scholar
Clark, Elizabeth (1992). The Origenist Controversy: The Cultural Construction of an Early Christian Debate (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Clements, Ashley (2014). Aristophanes’ Thesmophoriazusae. Philosophizing Theatre and the Politics of Perception in Late Fifth-Century Athens (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Cline, Rangar (2011). Ancient Angels: Conceptualizing Angeloi in the Roman Empire (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Cook, John Granger (2000). The Interpretation of the New Testament in Greco-Roman Paganism (Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck).Google Scholar
Cook, John Granger (2004). The Interpretation of the Old Testament in Greco-Roman Paganism (Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck).Google Scholar
Corke Webster, James (2017). ‘The Early Reception of Pliny the Younger in Tertullian of Carthage and Eusebius of Caesarea’, CQ 67, 247–62.Google Scholar
Courcelle, Pierre (1953). ‘Les sages de Porphyre et les “viri novi” d’Arnobe’, REL 31, 257–71.Google Scholar
Courcelle, Pierre (1958). ‘Propos antichrétiens rapportés par Saint Augustin’, Revue des études augustiniennes 4, 149–86.Google Scholar
Crawford, Matthew R. (2020). ‘Tatian, Celsus, and Christianity As “Barbarian Philosophy” in the Late Second Century’, in Ayres, Lewis and Ward, H. Clifton (eds.), The Rise of the Christian Intellectual (Berlin: de Gruyter), 45–80.Google Scholar
Crouzel, Henri (1961). Origène et la ‘connaissance mystique’ (Paris: Desclée de Brouwer).Google Scholar
Crouzel, Henri (1970). ‘L’école d’Origène à Césarée: Postscriptum à une édition de Grégoire le Thaumaturge’, Bulletin de littérature ecclésiastique 71, 15–27.Google Scholar
Crouzel, Henri (1976). ‘Conviction intérieure et aspects extérieurs de la religion chez Celse et Origène’, Bulletin de litterature ecclesiastique 77, 81–98.Google Scholar
Danker, Frederick William (2000). Greek–English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. 3rd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
de Certeau, Michel (1985). ‘What We Do When We Believe’, in Blonsky, Marshall (ed. and tr.), On Signs (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press), 192–202.Google Scholar
Declerck, J. H. (ed.) (1994). Anonymus dialogus cum Iudaeis saeculi ut videtur sexti (Leuven: Turnhout).Google Scholar
de Labriolle, Pierre (1934). La réaction païenne. Étude sur la polémique antichrétienne du Ier au VIe siècle (Paris: Cerf).Google Scholar
de Lange, Nicholas (1976). Origen and the Jews (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
de Lange, Nicholas (2015). Japheth in the Tents of Shem: Greek Bible Translations in Byzantine Judaism (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).Google Scholar
den Boer, W. (1948). Scriptorum Paganorum I–IV Saec. de Christianis Testimonia (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
den Boer, W. (1976). ‘La polémique anti-chrétienne du IIe siècle. La doctrine de vérité de Celse’, Athenaeum 54, 300–18.Google Scholar
den Dulk, Matthijs (2018). Between Jews and Heretics: Refiguring Justin Martyr’s Dialogue with Trypho (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Dickie, Matthew W. (2001). Magic and Magicians in the Greco-Roman World (London and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Dillon, John (2002). ‘Plutarch and God: Theology and Cosmogony in the Thought of Plutarch’, in Frede, Dorothea and Laks, André (eds.), Traditions of Theology: Studies in Hellenistic Theology, its Background and Aftermath (Leiden: Brill), 223–37.Google Scholar
Donini, Pierliuigi (1988). ‘La connaissance de Dieu et la hiérarchie divine chez Albinos’, in van den Broek, R., Baarda, T. and Mansfeld, J. (eds.), The Knowledge of God in the Graeco-Roman World (Leiden/New York/Copenhagen/Cologne: Brill), 118–31.Google Scholar
Dorival, Gilles (1998). ‘La forme littéraire du Contre Celse d’Origène’, in Perrone (1998), 29–45.Google Scholar
Dorival, Gilles (2000). ‘Celso [contro]’, in Monaci Castagno, A. (ed.), Dizionario Origene (Rome: Città nuova), 67–71.Google Scholar
Dörrie, Heinrich (1967). ‘Die platonische Theologie des Kelsos in ihrer Auseinandersetzung mit der christlichen Theologie auf Grund von Origenes C. Celsum 7, 42 ff.’, Nachrichten der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen (phil.-hist. Klasse) 2, 19–55.Google Scholar
Dreyer, Oskar (1970). Untersuchungen zum Begriff des Gottgeziemenden in der Antike (Hildesheim–New York: Olms).Google Scholar
Driediger-Murphy, Lindsay (2017). ‘God(s) Contrary to Nature: A Theological Debate between Pagans and Christians’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 17, 660–86.Google Scholar
Droge, Arthur J. (1988). ‘Justin Martyr and the Restoration of Philosophy’, Church History 56, 303–19.Google Scholar
Droge, Arthur J. (1989). Homer or Moses? Early Christian Interpretations of the History of Culture (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).Google Scholar
Dunn, Geoffrey (2002). ‘Rhetorical Structure in Tertullian’s “Ad Scapulam”’, VigChr 56, 47–55.Google Scholar
Edwards, Mark (1999). ‘The Flowering of Latin Apologetic’, in Mark Edwards, Goodman, Martin and Price, Simon (eds.), Apologetics in the Roman Empire: Pagans, Jews, and Christians (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 197–221.Google Scholar
Edwards, Mark (2019). ‘Origen in Paradise: A Response to Peter Martens’, ZAC 23, 163–85.Google Scholar
Eidinow, Esther and Kindt, Julia (2015). The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Greek Religion (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Eidinow, Esther, Kindt, Julia and Osborne, Robin (eds.) (2016). Theologies of Ancient Greek Religion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Elm, Susanna (2012). Sons of Hellenism, Fathers of the Church: Emperor Julian, Gregory of Nazianzus and the Vision of Rome (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Eshelman, Kendra (2007/08). ‘Affection and Affiliation: Social Networks and Conversion to Philosophy’, CJ 103, 129–40.Google Scholar
Eshelman, Kendra (2012). The Social World of Intellectuals in the Roman Empire: Sophists, Philosophers and Christians (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Faraone, Christopher (2004). ‘Introduction to Prayers, Hymns, Incantations and Curses’, in Johnston, S. I. (ed.), Religions of the Ancient World (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), 349–50.Google Scholar
Fédou, Michel (1988). Christianisme et religions païennes dans le Contre Celse d’Origène (Paris: Beauchesne).Google Scholar
Fédou, Michel (2003). ‘La référence à Homère chez Clément d’Alexandrie et Origène’, in Perrone, Lorenzo (ed.), Origeniana Octava. Origen and the Alexandrian Tradition (Leuven: Leuven University Press), 377–83.Google Scholar
Feldman, Louis H. (1993). Jew and Gentile in the Ancient World: Attitudes and Interactions (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Fiedrowicz, Michael and Barthold, Claudia (2011). Origenes, Contra Celsum / Gegen Celsus (Freiburg: Herder).Google Scholar
Francis, James A. (2008). Subversive Virtue: Asceticism and Authority in the Second-Century Pagan World (Philadelphia: Penn State Press).Google Scholar
Frede, Dorothea and Laks, André (eds.) (2002). Traditions of Theology: Studies in Hellenistic Theology, Its Background and Aftermath (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Frede, Michael (1997). ‘Celsus’ Attack on the Christians’, in Barnes, Jonathan and Griffin, Miriam (eds.), Philosophia Togata II. Plato and Aristotle at Rome (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 218–40.Google Scholar
Frede, Michael (1999). ‘Origen’s Treatise against Celsus’, in Edwards, Mark, Goodman, Martin and Price, Simon (eds.), Apologetics in the Roman Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 131–55.Google Scholar
Frede, Michael (2003). ‘Galen’s Theology’, in Barnes, Jonathan, Jouanna, Jacques and Barras, Vincent (eds.), Galien et la philosophie (Geneva: Fondation Hardt), 73–126.Google Scholar
Freppel, Charles Emile (1893). Arnobe, Commodien, Lactance et autres fragments inédits (Paris: Victor Retaux et Fils).Google Scholar
Fürst, Alfons (2017). Origenes, Grieche und Christ in römischer Zeit (Stuttgart: Hiersemann).Google Scholar
Gabrielsen, Vincent (2009). ‘Brotherhoods of Faith and Provident Planning: The Non-public Associations of the Greek World’, in Malkin, Irad, Constantakopoulou, Christy and Panagopoulou, Katerina (eds.), Greek and Roman Networks in the Mediterranean (London: Routledge), 176–203.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Eugene V. (1982). Divine Man or Magician? Celsus and Origen on Jesus (Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press).Google Scholar
Gathercole, Simon (2017). ‘Christians according to Second-Century Philosophers’, in Petersen, Anders Klostergaard and van Kooten, George (eds.), Religio-Philosophical Discourses in the Mediterranean World: From Plato, through Jesus, to Late Antiquity (Ancient Philosophy & Religion 1; Leiden/Boston, MA: Brill), 279–305.Google Scholar
Gazis, George A. (2018). Homer and the Poetics of Hades (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Gérard, Christopher (ed.) (1995). Contre les Galiléens: Une imprécation contre le christianisme (Paris: Editions Ousia).Google Scholar
Gersh, Stephen (1986). Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism: The Latin Tradition (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar
Gerson, Lloyd P. (2011). ‘Proclus and the Third Man’, Études Platoniciennes 8, 105–18.Google Scholar
Glöckner, Otto (1927). ‘Die Gottes- und Weltanschauung des Celsus.’ Philologus 82, 329–52.Google Scholar
Goldhill, Simon (1995). Foucault’s Virginity: Ancient Erotic Fiction and the History of Sexuality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Goldhill, Simon (ed.) (2001). Being Greek under Rome: Cultural Identity, the Second Sophistic and the Development of Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Goldhill, Simon (2002). Who Needs Greek? Contests in the Cultural History of Hellenism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Goldhill, Simon (2006). ‘Rethinking Religious Revolutions’, in Goldhill, Simon and Osborne, Robin (eds.), Rethinking Revolutions through Ancient Greece (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 141–63.Google Scholar
Goldhill, Simon and Greensmith, Emma (2020). ‘Gregory of Nazianzus in the Palatine Anthology: The Poetics of Christian Death’, CCJ 66, 29–69.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, Francisco (2012). ‘No Country for Young Men: Eros As Outlaw in Plato’s Laws’, in Recco, Gregory and Sanday, Eric (eds.), Plato’s Laws: Force and Truth in Politics (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Goranson, Stephen (2007). ‘Celsus of Pergamum: Locating a Critic of Early Christianity’, in Edwards, D. R. and McCollough, C. T. (eds.), The Archaeology of Difference: Gender, Ethnicity, Class and the ‘Other’ in Antiquity: Studies in Honor of Eric M. Meyers (Boston, MA: American Schools of Oriental Research), 363–69.Google Scholar
Gordon, Richard (1997). ‘What’s in a List? Listing in Greek and Greco-Roman Malign Magical Texts’, in Jordan, D., Montgomery, H. and Thomassen, E. (eds.), The World of Ancient Magic (Bergen: Norwegian Institute at Athens), 239–77.Google Scholar
Gordon, Richard (1999). ‘Imagining Greek and Roman Magic’, in Flint, Valerie (ed.), Witchcraft and Magic in Europe, vol. 2: Ancient Greece and Rome (London: Athlone Press), 161–275.Google Scholar
Goulet, Richard (2004). ‘Hypothèses récentes sur le traité de Porphyre, Contre les chrétiens’, in Narcy, M. and Rébillard, É. (eds.), Hellénisme et Christianisme (Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses universitaires du Septentrion), 61–109.Google Scholar
Griggs, C. Wilfrid (1988). Early Egyptian Christianity from Its Origins to 451 CE (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Grundeken, Mark (2017). Community Building in the Shepherd of Hermas: A Critical Study of Some Key Aspects (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Haas, Christopher (1997). Alexandria in Late Antiquity: Topography and Social Conflict (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre (1982). ‘Die Einteilung der Philosophie im Altertum’, Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 36, 422–44.Google Scholar
Hall, A. S. (1978). ‘The Klarian Oracle at Oenoanda’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 32, 263–68.Google Scholar
Harari, Yuval (2017). Jewish Magic before the Rise of the Kabbalah (Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press).Google Scholar
Harl, Marguerite (1958). Origène et la fonction révélatrice du Verbe Incarné (Paris: Éditions du Seuil).Google Scholar
Harland, Philip (2003). Associations, Synagogues, and Congregations: Claiming a Place in Ancient Mediterranean Society (Minneapolis: Fortress).Google Scholar
Harland, Philip (2009). Dynamics of Identity in the World of the Early Christians: Associations, Judeans, and Cultural Minorities (London: T&T Clark).Google Scholar
Harnack, A. von (ed.) (1916). Porphyrius, ‘Gegen die Christen’, 15 Bücher. Zeugnisse, Fragmente und Referate (Berlin: Akademie der Wissenschaften).Google Scholar
Harrison, Thomas (2015). ‘Belief vs Practice’, in Eidinow, Esther and Kindt, Julia, (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Greek Religion (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 21–28.Google Scholar
Hauck, Robert (1989). The More Divine Proof: Prophecy and Inspiration in Celsus and Origen (Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press).Google Scholar
Hezser, Catherine (1997). The Social Structure of the Rabbinic Movement in Roman Palestine (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).Google Scholar
Hijmans, Benjamin L. (1987). ‘Apuleius, Philosophus Platonicus’, ANRW 2.36.1, 395–475.Google Scholar
Hirsch-Luipold, Rainer (2007). Gott und die Götter bei Plutarch: Götterbilder – Gottesbilder – Weltbilder (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Hooker, Morna D. (1991). A Commentary on the Gospel according to St. Mark (London: A. & C. Black).Google Scholar
Horbury, William (2014). Jewish War under Trajan and Hadrian (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Horn, Cornelia (2011). ‘Women, Prostitution and Violence in the Syriac Martyrdom of the Mimes’, in Bumazhnov, Dmitrij and Seeliger, Hans R. (eds.), Syrien im 1.–7. Jahrhundert nach Christus (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), 111–43.Google Scholar
Horner, Timothy J. (2002). Listening to Trypho: Justin Martyr’s Dialogue Reconsidered (Leuven: Peeters).Google Scholar
Horrell, David (2016). Identity and Difference: A Contemporary Reading of Paul’s Ethics. 2nd ed. (London: Bloomsbury/T&T Clark).Google Scholar
Howard-Snyder, Daniel (2013). ‘Propositional Faith: What It Is and What It Is Not’, American Philosophical Quarterly 50, 357–72.Google Scholar
Howard-Snyder, Daniel (2017). ‘Pistis, Fides and Propositional Belief’, Religious Studies 53, 23–30.Google Scholar
Hunt, Emily (2003). Christianity in the Second Century: The Case of Tatian (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Hunter, Richard (2009). ‘The Trojan Oration of Dio Chrysostom and Ancient Homeric Criticism’, in Grethlein, Jonas and Rengakos, Antonios (eds.), Narratology and Interpretation (Berlin: De Gruyter), 43–61.Google Scholar
Hunter, Richard (2012). Plato and the Traditions of Ancient Literature: The Silent Stream (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Hunter, Richard (2015a). ‘The Rhetorical Criticism of Homer’, in Montanari, Franco, Matthaios, Stephanos and Rengakos, Antonios (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship, vol. 2 (Brill: Leiden), 673–705.Google Scholar
Hunter, Richard (2015b). Apollonius of Rhodes, Argonautica Book IV (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Hunter, Richard (2016). ‘Palaephatus, Strabo and the Boundaries of Myth’, Classical Philology 111, 245–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idel, Moshe (2008). Ben. Sonship and Jewish Mysticism (London and New York: Continuum).Google Scholar
Jaffé, Dan (2012). ‘The Virgin Birth of Jesus in the Talmudic Context: A Philological and Historical Analysis’, Laval théologique et philosophique 68, 577–92.Google Scholar
Jim, Theodora (2021). This-Worldly Salvation: Sōtēria and Saving Gods in Ancient Greece.Google Scholar
Johnson, Aaron P. (2010). ‘Rethinking the Authenticity of Porphyry, Contra Christianos, fr. 1’, Studia Patristica 46, 53–58.Google Scholar
Jones, Christopher (1986). Culture and Society in Lucian (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Judge, Edwin A. (1983). ‘Christian Innovation and its Contemporary Observers’, in Croke, Brian and Emmett, Alanna M. (eds.), History and Historians in Late Antiquity (Sydney: Pergamon Press), 13–29.Google Scholar
Junod, Erique (2005). ‘Origène face au problème du désaccord (διαφωνία) entre les évangiles (CIO X, 3–36)’, in Prinzivalli, Emanuela (ed.), Il Commento a Giovanni di Origene: Il testo e i suoi contesti (Villa Verucchio, RN: Pazzini), 423–39.Google Scholar
Kaczmarek, Sylwia and Pietras, Henryk (eds.) (2011). Origeniana Decima: Origen As Writer (Leuven: Brepols).Google Scholar
Kaiser, Erich (1964). ‘Odyssee-Szenen als Topoi’, Museum Helveticum 21, 109–36, 197–224.Google Scholar
Karamanolis, George E. (2006). Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Katz, Steven T. (ed.) (2006). The Cambridge History of Judaism, vol. 4: The Late Roman–Rabbinic Period (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kechagia, Eleni (2011). Plutarch against Colotes: A Lesson in History of Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Keim, Theodor (1873). Celsus’ Wahres Wort: Älteste Streitschrift antiker Weltanschauung des Christenthum vom 178 n. Chr wiedergestellt, aus dem Griechischen übersetzt, untersucht und erlaütert, mit Lucian und Minucius Felix verglichen (Zürich: Füssli).Google Scholar
Kerkeslager, Allen (2006). ‘The Jews in Egypt and Cyrenaica, 66–c. 235 CE’, in Katz, Steven T. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Judaism, vol. 4: The Late Roman–Rabbinic Period (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 53–68.Google Scholar
Kindt, Julia (2012). Rethinking Greek Religion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kloppenborg, John (2020). Christ’s Associations: Connecting and Belonging in the Ancient City (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Koetschau, Paul (1899). Origenes Werke. Band 1: Die Schrift vom Martyrium. Buch I–IV gegen Celsus; Band 2: Buch V–VIII gegen Celsus. Die Schrift vom Gebet (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), 56–125.Google Scholar
König, Jason (2006). ‘The Cynic and Christian Lives of Lucian’s Peregrinus’, in McGing, Brian and Mossman, Judith (eds.), The Limits of Ancient Biography (Swansea: Classical Press of Wales), 227–54.Google Scholar
Krämer, Hans Joachim (1964). Der Ursprung der Geistmetaphysik. Untersuchungen zur Geschichte des Platonismus zwischen Platon und Plotin (Amsterdam: Schippers).Google Scholar
Kritikos, Angelos (2007). ‘Platonism and Principles in Origen’, in Sorabji, Richard K. and Sharples, Robert W. (eds.), Greek and Roman Philosophy 100 BC–200 AD, vol. 2 (London: Institute of Classical Studies), 403–17.Google Scholar
Laato, Antti (2016). ‘Celsus, Toledot Yeshu and Early Traces of Apology for the Virgin Birth of Jesus’, Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis 27, 61–80.Google Scholar
Lamberton, Robert (1986). Homer the Theologian (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Lanfranchi, Pierluigi (2014). ‘Appeal to Tradition: Celsus on Jews, Christians and the Roman Empire’, Judaïsme Ancien – Ancient Judaism 2, 291–301.Google Scholar
Lasker, Daniel and Stroumsa, Sarah (1996). The Polemic of Nestor the Priest, 2 vols. (Jerusalem: Ben Zvi Institute).Google Scholar
Lauwers, Jeroen (2013). ‘Systems of Sophistry and Philosophy: The Case of the Second Sophistic’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 107, 331–63.Google Scholar
Lauwers, Jeroen (2015). Philosophy, Rhetoric, and Sophistry in the High Roman Empire. Maximus of Tyre and Twelve Other Intellectuals (Leiden: Brill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Boulluec, Alain (1985). La notion d’hérésie dans la littérature grecque IIe–IIIe siècles (Paris: Études Augustiniennes).Google Scholar
Le Boulluec, Alain (1998). ‘Vingt ans de recherche sur le Contre Celse. État des lieux’, in Perrone (1998), 9–28.Google Scholar
Lieu, Judith M. (2008). ‘Literary Strategies of Personification’, in Holmberg, Bengt and Winninge, Mikael (eds.), Identity Formation in the New Testament (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), 61–78.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, Jane L. (2003). Lucian: On the Syrian Goddess (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Lindars, Barnabas (1961). New Testament Apologetic: The Doctrinal Significance of the Old Testament Quotations (London: SCM).Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, Hugh (1983). The Justice of Zeus. 2nd ed. (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Lods, Marc (1941). ‘Étude sur les sources juives de la polémique de Celse contre les chrétiens’, RHPR 21, 1–33.Google Scholar
Loesche, Georg (1883–84). ‘Haben die späteren Neuplatonischen Polemiker gegen das Christenthum das Werk des Celsus benutzt?’, ZWT 27, 257–302.Google Scholar
Lona, Horacio (2005). Die ‘Wahre Lehre’ des Kelsos: Übersetzt und erklärt (Freiburg: Herder).Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1996). ‘Notes on Hierocles Stoicus apud Stobaeum’, in Funghi, M. S. (ed.), Le vie della ricerca. Studi in honore di Francesco Adorno (Florence: Olschki), 299–309.Google Scholar
Magness, Jodi (2005). ‘Heaven on Earth: Helios and the Zodiac Cycle in Ancient Palestinian Synagogues’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 59, 1–52.Google Scholar
Maier, Johann (1978). Jesus von Nazareth in der Talmudischen Überlieferung (Darmstadt: Wissenchaftliche Buchgesellechaft).Google Scholar
Mansfeld, Jaap (1994). Prolegomena. Questions to Be Settled before the Study of an Author, or a Text (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Maraval, Pierre (2001). La théologie politique de l’Empire chrétien. Louanges de Constantin (Triakontaétérikos) (Paris: Cerf).Google Scholar
Marcos, Natalio Fernández (2000). The Septuagint in Context: Introduction to the Greek Version of the Bible (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Markschies, Christoph (2007 [2015]). Kaiserzeitliche christliche Theologie und ihre Institutionen: Prolegomena zu einer Geschichte der antiken christlichen Theologie (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2007). Markschies, ET: Christoph, Christian Theology and Its Institutions in the Early Roman Empire: Prolegomena to a History of Early Christian Theology, tr. Coppins, Wayne (Waco, TX: Baylor-Mohr Siebeck, 2015).Google Scholar
Markus, Robert (1990). The End of Ancient Christianity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Martens, Peter (2012). Origen and Scripture: The Contours of the Exegetical Life (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Martens, Peter (2013). ‘Origen’s Doctrine of Pre-existence and the Opening Chapters of Genesis’, ZAC 16, 516–49.Google Scholar
Martin, Dale B. (2004). Inventing Superstition: From the Hippocratics to the Christians (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Masaracchia, Emanuela (1990). Contra Galilaeos, introduzione, testo critico e traduzione (Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo).Google Scholar
McKechnie, Paul (1989). Outsiders in the Greek Cities in the Fourth Century BC (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Meeks, Wayne (1983). The First Urban Christians: The Social World of the Apostle Paul (New Haven, CT: Yale).Google Scholar
Meerson, Michael and Schäfer, Peter (2014). Toledot Yeshu: The Life Story of Jesus, 2 vols. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).Google Scholar
Meijering, Roos (1987). Literary and Rhetorical Theories in Greek Scholia (Groningen: Egbert Forsten).Google Scholar
Michalewski, Alexandra (2014). La puissance de l’intelligible. La théorie plotinienne des Formes au miroir de l’héritage médioplatonicien (Leuven: Leuven University Press).Google Scholar
Minns, Dennis and Parvis, Paul (2009). Justin, Philosopher and Martyr: Apologies (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Mitchell, Margaret M. (2007). ‘Origen, Celsus and Lucian on the “Denouement of the Drama” of the Gospels’, in Aune, David and Young, Robin Darling (eds.), Reading Religions in the Ancient World: Essays Presented to Robert McQueen Grant on His 90th Birthday (Leiden: Brill), 215–36.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Margaret M. (2010). Paul, the Corinthians, and the Birth of Christian Hermeneutics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Mitchell, Stephen (1999). ‘The Cult of Theos Hypsistos between Pagans, Jews and Christians’, in Athanassiadi, Polymnia and Frede, Michael (eds.), Pagan Monotheism in Late Antiquity (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 81–148.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Stephen (2010). ‘Further Thoughts on the Cult of Theos Hypsistos’, in Mitchell, Stephen and Van Nuffelen, Peter (eds.), One God: Pagan Monotheism in the Roman Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 167–208.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Stephen and Van Nuffelen, Peter (eds.) (2010). One God: Pagan Monotheism in the Roman Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Moles, John (2006). ‘Jesus and Dionysius in The Acts of the Apostles and Early Christianity’, Hermathena 180, 65–104.Google Scholar
Momigliano, Arnaldo (1975). Alien Wisdom: The Limits of Hellenization (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Morgan, Teresa (1998). Literate Education in the Hellenstic and Roman Worlds (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Morgan, Teresa (2007). Popular Morality in the Early Roman Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Morgan, Teresa (2013). ‘Divine–Human Relations in the Aesopic Corpus’, Journal of Ancient History 1, 1–24.Google Scholar
Morgan, Teresa (2015). Roman Faith and Christian Faith. Pistis and Fides in the Early Roman Empire and Early Churches (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Morgan, Teresa (2017a). ‘Belief and Practice in Graeco-Roman Religiosity: Plutarch, De Iside et Osiride 379c’, in Carleton Paget and Lieu (2017), 200–13.Google Scholar
Morgan, Teresa (2017b). ‘Response to Articles on Roman Faith and Christian Faith’, Religious Studies 53, 30–42.Google Scholar
Morgan, Teresa (2017c). ‘Quaestiones disputatae: Roman Faith and Christian Faith’, NTS 63, 1–19.Google Scholar
Morlet, Sébastien (2008). ‘Un nouveau témoignage sur le Contra Christianos de Porphyre?’, Semitica et classica 1, 157–66.Google Scholar
Morlet, Sébastien (2009). La Démonstration évangélique d’Eusèbe de Césarée. Étude sur l’apologétique chrétienne à l’époque de Constantin (Paris: Institut d’études Augustiniennes).Google Scholar
Morlet, Sébastien (ed.) (2011a). Le traité de Porphyre contre les chrétiens: Un siècle de recherches, nouvelles questions (Paris: Institut d’études Augustiniennes).Google Scholar
Morlet, Sébastien (2011b). ‘Comment le problème du Contra Christianos peut-il se poser aujourd’hui?’, in Morlet, Sébastien (ed.), Le traité de Porphyre contre les chrétiens: Un siècle de recherches, nouvelles questions (Paris: Institut d’études Augustiniennes), 11–49.Google Scholar
Morlet, Sébastien (2011c). Pourquoi Dieu a-t-il interdit la connaissance du bien et du mal? La critique porphyrienne de Gn 2, 17: le problème de ses sources et de sa postérité’, Semitica et classica 4, 125–46.Google Scholar
Morlet, Sébastien, (2011d). ‘Eusebius’ Polemic against Porphyry: A Reassessment’, in Inowlocki, Sabrina and Zamagni, Claudio (eds.), Reconsidering Eusebius: Collected Papers on Literary, Historical, and Theological Issues (Leiden: Brill), 119–50.Google Scholar
Morlet, Sébastien (2012). ‘Que savons-nous du Contre Porphyre d’Eusèbe?’ Revue des études grecques 125, 473–514.Google Scholar
Morlet, Sébastien (2015). ‘Genèse 2, 17: l’exégèse patristique’, in Arnold, Matthieu, Dahan, Gilbert and Noblesse-Rocher, Annie (eds.), Genèse 2, 17. L’arbre de la connaissance du bien et du mal (Paris: Cerf), 37–68.Google Scholar
Morlet, Sébastien (2020). ‘Les attaques antichrétiennes de Porphyre ont–elles joué un rôle dans la constitution des doctrines chrétiennes?’, in Hoffmann, Philippe, Le Boulluec, Alain, Soares Santoprete, Gabriela & Timotin, Andrei (eds.), Exégèse, révélation et formation des dogmes dans l’Antiquité tardive (Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes), 63–96.Google Scholar
Moses, Robert Ewusie (2014). Practice of Power: Revisiting the Principalities and Powers in the Pauline Letters (Minneapolis: Fortress Press).Google Scholar
Murcia, Thierry (2014). Jésus dans le Talmud et la littérature rabbinique ancienne (Brussels: Brepols).Google Scholar
Murray, Oswyn and Price, Simon (eds.) (1990). The Greek City from Homer to Alexander (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Nasrallah, Laura (2005). ‘Mapping the World: Justin, Tatian, Lucian and the Second Sophistic’, Harvard Theological Review 98, 283–314.Google Scholar
Needham, Rodney (1973). Belief, Language and Experience (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar
Niehoff, Maren R. (2013). ‘A Jewish Critique of Christianity from Second-Century Alexandria: Revisiting the Jew Mentioned in Contra Celsum’, JECS 21, 151–75.Google Scholar
Niehoff, Maren R. (2018). Philo of Alexandria, An Intellectual Biography (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Niehoff, Maren R. (2020). ‘Homer between Celsus, Origen and the Jews of Late Antique Palestina’, in J.J. Price and R. Zelnick-Abramovitz eds., Text and Intertext in Greek Epic and Drama (London: Routledge), 187–209.Google Scholar
Nongbri, Brent (2013). Before Religion: A History of a Modern Concept (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Norelli, Enrico (1998). ‘La tradizione sulla nascita di Gesù nell’ ἈΛΗΘΗΣ ΛΟΓΟΣ di Celso’, in Perrone (1998), 133–66.Google Scholar
Nünlist, René (2009). The Ancient Critic at Work: Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
O’Keefe, John J. and Reno, Russell R. (2005). Sanctified Vision: An Introduction to Early Christian Interpretation of the Bible (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
Oppy, Graham and Trakakis, Nick N. (eds.) (2014). Ancient Philosophy of Religion: The History of Western Philosophy of Religion, vol. 1 (London and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Opsomer, Jan (2005). ‘Demiurges in Early Imperial Platonism’, in Hirsch–Luipold, R. (ed.), Gott und die Götter bei Plutarch. Götterbilder, Gottsesbilder, Weltbilder (Berlin/New York: De Gruyter), 51–99.Google Scholar
Opsomer, Jan (2009). ‘M. Annius Ammonius, a Philosophical Profile’, in Bonazzi, Mauro and Opsomer, Jan (eds.), The Origins of the Platonic System: Platonisms of the Early Empire and their Philosophical Contexts (Louvain: Peeters), 123–86.Google Scholar
Osborne, Robin (1990). ‘The Demos and its Divisions in Classical Athens’, in Murray, Oswyn and Price, Simon (eds.), The Greek City from Homer to Aristotle (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 265–93.Google Scholar
Patillon, Michel and Bolognesi, Giancarlo (1997). Aelius Theon, Progymnasmata (Paris: Belles Lettres).Google Scholar
Pearson, Birger A. (1980). ‘Gnostic Interpretation of the Old Testament in the “Testimony of Truth” (NHC IX, 3)’, Harvard Theological Review 73, 311–19.Google Scholar
Pépin, Jean (1976). Mythe et allégorie: Les origines grecques et les contestations judéo-chrétiennes. Nouvelle édition, revue et augmentée (Paris: Études augustiniennes).Google Scholar
Perrone, Lorenzo (ed.) (1998). Discorsi di verità. Paganesimo, Giudaismo e Cristianesimo a confronto nel Contro Celso di Origene (Rome: Institutum Patristicum Augustinianum).Google Scholar
Perrone, Lorenzo (2001). ‘Prayer in Origen’s Contra Celsum: The Knowledge of God and the Truth of Christianity’, VigChr 55, 1–19.Google Scholar
Perrone, Lorenzo (2003). Origeniana Octava. Origen and the Alexandrian Tradition (Leuven: Leuven University Press).Google Scholar
Perrone, Lorenzo (2004). ‘Fra silenzio e parola: dall’apologia alla testimonianza del cristianesimo nel « Contro Celso » di Origene’, in Wlosok, Antonie and Riedweg, Christoph (eds.), L’apologétique chrétienne gréco-latine à l’époque prénicénienne (Vandoeuvres-Genéve: Fondation Hardt), 103–41.Google Scholar
Petrovic, Andrej and Petrovic, Ivana (2016). Inner Purity and Pollution in Greek Religion (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Petrucci, Federico M. (2018). Taurus of Beirut, the Other Side of Middle Platonism (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Pichler, Karl (1980). Streit um das Christentum: Der Angriff des Kelsos und die Antwort des Origenes (Frankfurt: Peter Lang).Google Scholar
Pleket, H. (1981). ‘Religious History As the History of Mentality: The “Believer” As Servant of the Deity in the Greek World’, in Versnel, H. S. (ed.), Faith, Hope and Worship. Aspects of Religious Mentality in the Ancient World (Leiden: Brill), 152–92.Google Scholar
Pollman, Karla (2017). The Baptized Muse: Early Christian Poetry As Cultural Authority (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Pontani, Filippomaria (2005). Eraclito. Questioni omeriche sulle allegorie di Omero in merito agli dèi (Pisa: Edizioni ETS).Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (1992). ‘Hermeneutic Lines and Circles: Aristarchus and Crates on the Exegesis of Homer’, in Lamberton, Robert and Keaney, John J. (eds.), Homer’s Ancient Readers (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), 67–114.Google Scholar
Price, Robert M. (1988). ‘“Hellenization” and Logos Doctrine in Justin Martyr’, VigChr 42, 18–23.Google Scholar
Prince, Susan (2015). Antisthenes of Athens: Texts, Translations, and Commentary (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar
Rajak, Tessa (2017). ‘Mediterranean Jewish Diaspora in the Second Century’, in Carleton Paget and Lieu (2017), 39–56.Google Scholar
Ramelli, Ilaria (2009). ‘Origen, Patristic Philosophy and Christian Platonism’, VigChr 63, 217–63.Google Scholar
Reed, Annette Yoshiko (2006). ‘Rabbis, “Jewish Christians”, and Other Late Antique Jews: Reflections on the Fate of Judaism(s) After 70 C. E.’, in Henderson, Ian H., Oegema, Gerber S. and Ricker, Sara Parks (eds.), The Changing Faces of Judaism, Christianity, and other Greco-Roman Religions in Antiquity (Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus), 323–46.Google Scholar
Reed, Annette Yoshiko (2018). Jewish Christianity and the History of Judaism (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).Google Scholar
Reemts, Christiana (1998). Vernunftgemässer Glaube. Die Begründung des Christentums in der Schrift des Origenes gegen Celsus (Bonn: Borengässer).Google Scholar
Ressa, Pietro (2003). ‘Note al testo del Contro Celso’, Vetera Christianorum 40, 159–66.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, Gretchen (1999). Demiurge and Providence: Stoic and Platonist Readings of Plato’s Timaeus (Turnhout: Brepols).Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, Gretchen (2011). ‘Authority and Agency in Stoicism’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 51, 296–322.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, Gretchen (2016). ‘Dio of Prusa and the Roman Stoics on How to Speak the Truth to Oneself and to Power’, in Arruzza, Cinzia and Nikulin, Dmitri (eds.), Philosophy and Political Power in Antiquity (Leiden: Brill), 134–47.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, Gretchen (2017a). ‘“Becoming Like God” in Platonism and Stoicism’, in Engberg-Pedersen, T. (ed.), From Stoicism to Platonism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 142–58.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, Gretchen (2017b). ‘Maximus of Tyre on God and Providence’, in Seaford, R., Wilkins, J. and Wright, M. (eds.), Selfhood and the Soul: Essays on Ancient Thought and Literature in Honour of Christopher Gill (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 125–38.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, Gretchen (forthcoming). ‘Philosophy in Aelius Aristides’ Regarding Zeus’.Google Scholar
Riedweg, Christoph (1987). Mysterienterminologie bei Platon, Philon und Klemens von Alexandrien (Berlin/New York: De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Rizzi, Marco (1998). ‘Problematiche politiche nel debattio tra Celso e Origene’, in Perrone (1998), 171–206.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Marco (2018). ‘Some Reflections on Origen, Celsus and their Views on the Jews’, in Lanfranchi, P. and Verheyden, J. (eds.), Jews and Christians in Antiquity: A Regional Perspective (Leuven/Paris/Bristol, CT: Peeters), 37–60.Google Scholar
Romaniuk, Kazimierz (1961). ‘Le Platon d’Origène. Les citations des Lois, du Phédon, du Phèdre et de la République dans Contre Celse d’Origène’, Aegyptus 41, 44–73.Google Scholar
Rondeau, Marie-Josèphe (1985). Les Commentaires Patristiques du Psautier (IIIe–Ve siècles) II. Exégèse prosopologique et théologie (Rome: Pontificium Institutum Studiorum Orientalium).Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, Hans-Udo (1972). ‘Zur Datierung von Celsus’ ’Αληθὴς λόγος’, VigChr 26, 102–11.Google Scholar
Runia, David T. (1993). Philo in Early Christian Literature: A Survey (Assen: Van Gorcum).Google Scholar
Rüpke, Jörg (ed.) (2013). The Individual in the Religions of the Ancient Mediterranean (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Rüpke, Jörg (2016). On Roman Religion: Lived Religion and the Individual in Ancient Rome (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Scarborough, John (1991). ‘The Pharmacology of Sacred Plants, Herbs and Roots’, in Faraone, C. and Obbink, D. (eds.), Magika Hiera: Ancient Greek Magic and Religion (New York: Oxford University Press), 138–74.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Peter (1998). Judeophobia: Attitudes towards the Jews in the Ancient World (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Schäfer, Peter (2007). Jesus in the Talmud (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Schäfer, Peter, (2011). ‘Agobard’s and Amulo’s Toledot Yeshu’, in Schäfer, Peter, Meerson, Michael and Deutsch, Yaacov (eds.), Toledot Yeshu (‘The Life Story of Jesus’) Revisited: A Princeton Conference (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), 27–48.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Peter (2020). Two Gods in Heaven: Jewish Concepts of God in Antiquity (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), esp. pp. 99-133.Google Scholar
Scheid, John (2005). Quand faire, c’est croire: Les rites sacrificiels des Romains (Paris: Flammarion).Google Scholar
Schlanger-Schöningen, Heinrich (2003). Die römische Gesellschaft bei Galen (Berlin/New York: De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Schlapbach, Karin (2010). ‘The Logoi of Philosophers in Lucian of Samosata’, Classical Antiquity 29, 150–77.Google Scholar
Schmitt-Pantel, Pauline (1990). ‘Collective Activities and the Political in the Greek City’, in Murray, Oswyn and Price, Simon (eds.), The Greek City from Homer to Alexander (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 199–213.Google Scholar
Schoedel, William R. (1972). Athenagoras: Legatio and De resurrectione (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Schröder, Heinrich O. (2020 [1938]). Der Alethes Logos des Celsus. Untersuchungen zum Werk und seinem Verfasser mit einer Wiederherstellung des griechischen Textes und Kommentar. (Berlin: Logos).Google Scholar
Schwartz, Jacques (1960). ‘Du Testament de Lévi au Discours Véritable de Celse’, Revue d’histoire et de philosophie religieuses 50, 126–45.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Jacques (1965). Biographie de Lucien de Samosate (Brussels: Bruxelles-Berchem).Google Scholar
Schwemer, Anna Maria (2013). ‘Zum Abbruch des jüdischen Lebens in Alexandria: Der Aufstand in der Diaspora unter Trajan (115–117)’, in Georges, T., Albrecht, F. and Feldmeier, R. (eds.), Alexandria (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), 381–99.Google Scholar
Sedley, David (2004). The Midwife of Platonism: Text and Subtext in Plato’s Theaetetus (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Sedley, David (2007). Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Sharples, Robert W. (2002). ‘Aristotelian Theology after Aristotle’, in Frede, Dorothea and Laks, André (eds.), Traditions of Theology: Studies in Hellenistic Theology, Its Background and Aftermath (Leiden: Brill), 1–40.Google Scholar
Sheridan, Mark (2000). ‘“Digne Deo”. Traditional Greek Principle of Interpretation in Latin Dress’, in (no eds.), L’Esegesi dei padri latini: dalle origini a Gregorio Magno (Rome: Institutum Patristicum Augustinianum), 23–40.Google Scholar
Simmons, Michael B. (1995). Arnobius of Sicca: Religious Conflict and Competition in the Age of Diocletian (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Smith, Morton (1978). Jesus the Magician: Charlatan or Son of God? (London: Harper and Row).Google Scholar
Stanton, Gregory R. (1973). ‘Sophists and Philosophers: Problems of Classification’, American Journal of Philology 94, 350–64.Google Scholar
Stern, Menachem (1974–80). Greek and Latin Authors on Jews and Judaism, 3 vols. (Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities).Google Scholar
Still, Todd D. and Horrell, David G. (eds.) (2009). After the First Urban Christians: The Social-Scientific Study of Pauline Christianity Twenty-Five Years Later (London: T&T Clark).Google Scholar
Strohmaier, Gotthard (1965). ‘Galen als Vertreter der Gebildetenreligion seiner Zeit’, in Welskopf, E. and Diesner, H.-J. (eds.), Neue Beiträge zur Geschichte der alten Welt, vol. 2 (Berlin: Akademie Verlag), 375–79.Google Scholar
Strohmaier, Gotthard (2006). ‘Galen in den Schulen der Juden und Christen’, Judaica: Beiträge zum Verstehen des Judentums 62, 140–56.Google Scholar
Stroumsa, Guy G. (1998). ‘Origen and the Nature of Religion’, in Perrone (1998), 81–94.Google Scholar
Swain, Simon (1996). Hellenism and Empire: Language, Classicism and Power in the Greek World A.D. 50–250 (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Taylor, Claire (2015). ‘Epigraphic Evidence’, in Eidinow, Esther and Kindt, Julia (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Greek Religion (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 97–111.Google Scholar
Taylor, Miriam S. (1995). Anti-Judaism and Early Christianity: A Critique of the Scholarly Consensus (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Trapp, Michael (2007). Philosophy in the Roman Empire: Ethics, Politics and Society. (Aldershot: Ashgate).Google Scholar
Trovato, Stefano (2012). ‘Un nuovo frammento e nuove testimonianze del “Contra Galilaeos” di Giuliano l’Apostata’, Jahrbuch der österreichischen Byzantinistik 62, 265–79.Google Scholar
VanderKam, James (1996). ‘1 Enoch, Enochic Motifs, and Enoch in Early Christian Literature’, in VanderKam, James C. and Adler, William (eds.), The Jewish Apocalyptic Heritage in Early Christianity (Assen: Van Gorcum), 33–101.Google Scholar
Van Hoof, Lieve (2010). Plutarch’s Practical Ethics: The Social Dynamics of Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Van Nuffelen, Peter (2011). ‘Celsus and Christian Superstition’, in Peter Van Nuffelen (ed.), Rethinking the Gods: Philosophical Readings of Religion in the Post-Hellenistic Period (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 217–30.Google Scholar
Vermander, Jean-Marie (1970). ‘De quelques répliques à Celse dans l’Apologeticum de Tertullien’, Revue des études augustiniennes 16, 205–25.Google Scholar
Vermander, Jean-Marie (1971a). ‘Celse, source et adversaire de Minucius Felix’, Revue des études augustiniennes 17, 13–25.Google Scholar
Vermander, Jean-Marie (1971b). ‘Théophile d’Antioche contre Celse: À Autolykos, III’, Revue des études augustiniennes 17, 203–25.Google Scholar
Vermander, Jean-Marie (1972). ‘La parution de l’ouvrage de Celse et la datation de quelques apologies’, Revue des études augustiniennes 18, 27–42.Google Scholar
Vermander, Jean-Marie (1977). ‘De quelques répliques à Celse dans le Protreptique de Clément d’Alexandrie’, Revue des études augustiniennes 23, 3–17.Google Scholar
Vermander, Jean-Marie (1978). ‘Celse et l’attribution à Athénagore d’un ouvrage “Sur la résurrection des morts”’, Mélanges de sciences religieuses 35, 125–34.Google Scholar
Versluys, Miguel John (2002). Aegyptiaca Romana: Nilotic Scenes and the Roman Views of Egypt (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Versnel, Henk (ed.) (1981). Faith, Hope and Worship: Aspects of Religious Mentality in the Ancient World (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Versnel, Henk (2011). Coping with the Gods: Wayward Readings in Greek Theology (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Veyne, Paul (1988). Did the Greeks Believe their Myths? (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Villani, Andrea (2008). ‘Origenes als Schriftsteller: ein Beitrag zu seiner Verwendung von Prosopopoiie, mit einigen Beobachtungen über die prosopologische Exegese’, Adamantius 14, 130–50.Google Scholar
Villani, Andrea (2012). ‘Homer in the Debate between Celsus and Origen’, Revue d’études augustiniennes et patristiques 58, 113–39.Google Scholar
Villani, Andrea (2018). ‘Platon und der Platonismus in Origenes’ Contra Celsum’, in Bäbler, B. and Nesselrath, H.-G. (eds.), Origenes der Christ und Origenes der Platoniker (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck), 109–27.Google Scholar
Walzer, Richard (1949). Galen on Jews and Christians (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Ward, H. Clifton (2022). Clement of Alexandria and the Creative Exegesis of Christian Scripture (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Wendt, Heidi (2016). At the Temple Gates: The Religion of Freelance Experts in the Roman Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
West, Martin L. (ed.) (1998). Homeri Ilias (Bibliotheca Scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana) (Stuttgart/Leipzig: B.G. Teubner).Google Scholar
West, Martin L. (ed.) (2017). Homerus, Odyssea (Bibliotheca Scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana) (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar
White, Adam G. (2013). ‘Where Is the Wise Man? Graeco-Roman Education As a Background to the Divisions in 1 Corinthians 1–4’. PhD thesis, Macquarie University.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, Timothy (2001a). Greek Literature and the Roman Empire: The Politics of Imitation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, Timothy (2001b). ‘“Greece Is the World”: Exile and Identity in the Second Sophistic’, in Being Greek under Rome. Cultural Identity, the Second Sophistic and the Development of Empire, ed. Goldhill, S. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, Timothy (2005). The Second Sophistic (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, Timothy (2013). Beyond the Second Sophistic: Adventures in Greek Post-classicism (Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, Timothy (2016). Battling the Gods: Atheism in the Ancient World. (London: Faber and Faber).Google Scholar
Whittaker, John (1994). ‘Celsus’, in Goulet, R. (ed.), Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques ΙΙ (Paris: CNRS Éditions), 255–56.Google Scholar
Wifstrand, Albert (1942). ‘Die wahre Lehre des Kelsos’, Kungl. Humanistiska Vetenskapssamfundets i Lund Årsberättelse/Bulletin de la Société Royale des Lettres de Lund 1941/1942, 391–431.Google Scholar
Wijma, Sarta M. (2014). Embracing the Immigrant: The Participation of Metics in Athenian Polis Religion (5th–4th century BC) (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag).Google Scholar
Wilburn, Andrew T. (2012). Materia Magica: The Archaeology of Magic in Roman Egypt, Cyprus and Spain (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar
Wilkerson, K. E. (1988). ‘Carneades at Rome: A Problem of Sceptical Rhetoric’, Philosophy and Rhetoric 2, 131–44.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (2019). Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Wolfson, Harry A. (1947). Philo: Foundations of Religious Philosophy in Judaism, Christianity and Islam (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Woodman, Anthony J. (1988). Rhetoric in Classical Historiography (Beckenham: Croom Helm).Google Scholar
Young, Frances M. (1999). ‘Greek Apologists of the Second Century’, in Edwards, Mark, Goodman, Martin and Price, Simon (eds.), Apologetics in the Roman Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 81–104.Google Scholar
Zamagni, Claudio (2003). ‘Les questions et réponses sur les Évangiles d’Eusèbe de Césarée. Étude et édition du résumé grec.’ PhD thesis, École Pratique des Hautes Études, Paris.Google Scholar
Zamagni, Claudio (2008). Eusèbe de Césarée: Questions évangéliques. Sources chrétiennes 523 (Paris: Cerf).Google Scholar
Zamagni, Claudio (2016). L’extrait des « Questions et réponses sur les Évangiles » d’Eusèbe de Césarée: Un commentaire (Turnhout: Brepols).Google Scholar