Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:04:28.657Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Sarah Culpepper Stroup
Sarah Culpepper Stroup
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Catullus, Cicero, and a Society of Patrons
The Generation of the Text
 , pp. 291 - 303
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baehrens, E. (ed.). 1885. Catulli Veronesis liber, vol 1. Leipzig: Teubner.
Benseler, G. E. (ed.). 1913. Isocratis Orationes. Leipzig: Teubner.
Blänsdorf, J. (ed.). 1995. Fragmenta Poetarum Latinorum. Post W. Morel and K. Büchner. Stuttgart: Teubner.
Diehl, E. (ed.). 1925. Anthologia lyrica graeca. Leipzig: Teubner.
Douglas, A. E. (ed.). 1966. M. Tulli Ciceronis Brutus. Oxford University Press.
Groningen, B. A. (ed.). 1966. Theognis: Le premier livre. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche.
Halm, K. F. (ed.). 1868. M. Fabi Quintiliani institutionis oratoriae. Libri XII. Leipzig: Teubner.
Heiberg, J. L. (ed.). 1910–1975. Archimedis opera omnia, cum commentariis Eutocii. Leipzig: Teubner.
Keil, H. (ed.). 1855–1880. Grammatici Latini. 7 vols. and suppl. Leipzig: Teubner.
Koestermann, E. (ed. postHalm, C. and Andresen, G.). 1936. P. Cornelii Taciti libri qui supersunt. Leipzig: Teubner.
Kroll, W. (ed. and comm.). 1989 (repr.). C. Valerius Catullus. Stuttgart:Teubner.
Leeman, A. D. (ed.). 1981–1996. M. Tullius Cicero/De Oratore libri III. Heidelberg: C. Winter.
Lindsey, W. M. (ed.). 1903. T. Macci Plauti Comoediae. Oxford University Press.
Malcovati, E. (ed.). 1970. M. Tullius Cicero: Fasc. 4 Brutus. Leipzig: Teubner.
Mayer, R. (ed.). 2001. Tacitus. Dialogus de Oratoribus. Cambridge University Press.
Mynors, R. A. B. (ed.). 1958. Catulli Carmina. Oxford University Press.
Peter, H. (ed.). 1914. Historicorum Romanorum Reliquiae, 2nd edn. Stuttgart:Teubner.
Pfeiffer, R. (ed.). 1949–1953. Callimachus. 2 vols. Oxford University Press.
Préhac, F. (ed.). 1961. Sénèque: Des Bienfaits. Paris: Société d'Edition “Les Belles Lettres.”
Quinn, K. (ed.). 1970. Catullus: The Poems. London: MacMillan.
Reynolds, L. D. (ed.). 1965. L. Annaei Senecae ad Lucilium Epistulae Morales. Oxford University Press.
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (ed.). 1965–1970. Letters to Atticus. 7 vols. Cambridge University Press.
Sutton, E. W. and Rackham, H. (eds. and transl.; rev. edn.). 1942. Cicero: On the Orator, Books I–II. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Tyrrell, R. Y. and Purser, L. C. (eds.). 1894–1915. The Correspondence of M. Tullius Cicero, 2nd edn. Dublin: Hodges, Foster and Figgis.
West, M. L. 1978 (repr. 1996). Hesiod: Works and Days. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilkins, A. S. (ed.). 1963. M. Tulli Ciceronis Rhetorica. de Oratore. Oxford University Press.
Winterbottom, M. (ed.). 1970. M. Fabi Quintiliani institutionis oratoriae. Libri Duodecim. Oxford University Press.
Zetzel, J. E. G. (ed.). 1995. Marcus Tullius Cicero. De re publica: Selections. Cambridge University Press.
Adams, B. 1997. E Pluribus Barnum. The Great Showman and the Making of U. S. Popular Culture. Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Adams, J. N. 1982. The Latin Sexual Vocabulary. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Andre, J. M. 1966. L'Otium dans la vie morale et intellectuelle romaine, des origines a l'époque Augustéenne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Andrews, McMeel. 2005. The Governator: 2005 Wall Calendar. New Jersey. Andrews McMeel Publishing.Google Scholar
Apter, E. 1991. Feminizing the Fetish: Psychoanalysis and Narrative Obsession in Turn-of-the-Century France. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Apter, E. 1993. “Introduction.” In Apter, and Pietz, (eds.): 1–12.
Apter, E., and Pietz, W. (eds.). 1993. Fetishism as Cultural Discourse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Arkins, B. 1983. “Caelius and Rufus in Catullus.” Philologus 127: 306–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axtell, H. L. 1907. The Deification of Abstract Ideas in Roman Literature and Inscriptions. University of Chicago Press. (Reprinted New Rochelle, NY: Caratzas. 1987.)Google Scholar
Badian, E. (ed.). 1966. Ancient Society and Institutions: Studies Presented to Victor Ehrenberg on his 75th Birthday. Oxford: Blackwell.
Badian, E. 1982. Review of Saller (1982). CP 80: 348–349.Google Scholar
Baier, T. 1997. Werk und Wirkung Varros im Spiegel seiner Zeitgenossen. Hermes Einzelschriften 73. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Balsdon, J. P. V. D. 1960. “Auctoritas, Dignitas, Otium.” CQ 10: 45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 2001. Speaking Volumes: Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and other Latin Poets. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Barton, C. 1993. The Sorrows of the Ancient Romans: The Gladiator and the Monster. PrincetonUniversity Press.Google Scholar
Batstone, W. W. 1998. “Dry Pumice and the Programmatic Language of Catullus 1.” CP 93.2: 125–135.Google Scholar
Beard, M., and Crawford, M. 1985. Rome in the Late Republic. Ithaca, NY: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Belfiore, E. 1994. “Xenia in Sophocles' Philoctetes.” CJ 89: 113–129.Google Scholar
Bennett, S. 1997. Theatre Audiences: A Theory of Production and Reception, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benveniste, E. 1966. “Don et échange dans le vocabulaire indo-européen.” In Problèmes de linguistique générale: vol. 1, 315–326. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bernstein, W. H. 1985. “A Sense of Taste: Catullus 13.” CJ 80.2: 127–130.Google Scholar
Bickel, E. 1953. “Salaputium: Mentula Salax.” RhM 96: 94–95.Google Scholar
Bloomer, W. M. 1997. Latinity and Literary Society at Rome. Philadelphia, Pa.: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomer, W. M. 2007. “Roman Declamation: The Elder Seneca and Quintilian.” In Dominik, and Hall, (eds.): 297–306.
Bongi, V. 1943. “Note critiche sul carme XIII di Catullo.” Aevum 17: 228–236.Google Scholar
Bowditch, P. L. 2001. Horace and the Gift Economy of Patronage. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bower, R. W. 1974. “Ineptiae and Ioci.” Latomus 33.3: 523–528.Google Scholar
Boyancè, P. 1941. “Cum dignitate otium.” REA 13: 172–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunt, P. A. 1965. “‘Amicitia’ in the late Republic.” PCPS 191 n.s. 2: 1–20.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. 1982. Review of Saller (1982). Times Literary Supplement, 19 Nov.: 1276.Google Scholar
Buchheit, V. 1975. “Catulls Literarkritik und Kallimachos.” Grazer Beiträge 4: 21–50.Google Scholar
Buchheit, V. 1976a. “Catullus c. 50 als Programm und Bekenntnis.” RhM 119: 162–180.Google Scholar
Buchheit, V. 1976b. “Sal et lepos versiculorum (Catull c. 16).” Hermes 104: 331–347.Google Scholar
Burger, R. 1980. Plato's Phaedrus: A Defense of the Philosophical Art of Writing. Birmingham, Ala.: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Burgess, D. L. 1986. “Catullus c. 50: The Exchange of Poetry.” AJP 107: 576–586.Google Scholar
Bury, R. 1903. The Love of Books. The Philobiblon of Richard de Bury. Trans. Thomas, E. C.. London: Alexander Moring, The de La More Press.Google Scholar
Bushala, E. W. 1981. “A Note on Catullus 106.” HSCP 85: 131–132.Google Scholar
Butler, S. 2002. The Hand of Cicero. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butor, M. 1968. Inventory. Trans. Howard, R.. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. 1969. “Catullus 1.” Mnemosyne 22: 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camille, M. 1997. “The Book as Flesh and Fetish in Richard de Bury's Philobiblon.” In Frese, D. and O'Keeffe, K. (eds.), The Book and The Body.: 34–77, University of NotreDame Press.Google Scholar
Cavallo, G. 1975. Libri, editori e pubblico nel mondo antico: Guida storica e critica. Rome, Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. 1934. “The Nightingale in Greek and Latin Poetry.” CA 30.2: 78–84.Google Scholar
Clack, J. 1976. “Otium tibi molestum est: Catullus 50 and 51.” CB 5: 50–53.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. L. 1978. “Poets and Patrons at Rome.” GR 25: 46–54.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. L. 1996 (1953). Rhetoric at Rome. A Historical Survey, 3rd edn. New York. Routledge.Google Scholar
Clausen, W. 1970. “Catullus and Callimachus.” HSCP 74: 84–95.Google Scholar
Clausen, W. 1976. “Catulli Veronensis Liber.” CP 71.1: 37–43.Google Scholar
Clay, D. 1975. “The Tragic and Comic Poet of the Symposium.” Arion 2.2: 238–261.Google Scholar
Collins, J. H. 1952. “Cicero and Catullus.” CJ 48.1: 11–17 and 36–41.Google Scholar
Connery, C. L. 1998. The Empire of the Text: Writing and Authority in Early Imperial China. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. P. T. 1997. “Vile Eloquence: Performance and Identity in Greco-Roman Rhetoric.” Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Connor, P. J. 1982. “Book Dispatch: Horace Epistles 1.20 and 1.13.” Ramus 11: 145–152.Google Scholar
Conte, G. 1994. Latin Literature: A History. Trans. Solodow, J. B.. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Copley, F. O. 1957. “The Unity of Catullus 68: A Further View.” CP 52: 29–32.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A. 1996. Controlling Laughter: Political Humor in the Late Roman Republic. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Coulon, V. 1956. “Observations critiques.” RhM 99: 245–254.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. 1985. “Three Poems of Catullus.” BICS 32: 90–91.Google Scholar
Crowther, N. B. 1970. “ΟΙ ΝΕΩΤΕΡΟΙ, Poetae Novi and Cantatores Euphorionis.” CQ 20.2: 322–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, L. W. 1950. “Roman Study Abroad.” AJP 71.1: 40–58.Google Scholar
Daly, L. W. 1952. “Callimachus and Catullus.” CP 47: 97–99.Google Scholar
D'Arms, J. 1984. “Control, Companionship and Clientela: Some Social Functions of the Roman Communal Meal.” EMC/CV 28: 327–348.Google Scholar
D'Arms, J. 1990. “The Roman convivium and the Ideal of Equality.” In Murray, O. (ed.), Sympotica: A Symposium on the Symposium: 308–320. Oxford. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
D'Arms, J. 1999. “Performing Culture: Roman Spectacle and the Banquets of the Powerful.” In Bergmann, B. and Kondoleon, C. (eds.), The Art of Ancient Spectacle: 301–319. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Davisson, M. H. T. 1984. “Parents and Children in Ovid's Poems from Exile.” CW 78: 111–114.Google Scholar
Deniaux, E. 1993. Clientèles et pouvoir à l'epoque de Cicéron. Rome: Ecole française de Rome.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 1981. Dissemination. Trans. Johnson, B.. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 1994. Given Time: I. Counterfeit Money. Trans. Kamuf, P.. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dettmer, H. 1986. “Meros Amores: A Note on Catullus 13.9.” QUCC 24: 87–91.Google Scholar
Dimarogonas, A. D. 1995. “Pliny the Elder on the Making of Papyrus Paper.” CQ 45: 588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, S. 1993. “The Meaning of Gift and Debt in the Roman Elite.” EMC/CV 37: 451–464.Google Scholar
Dominik, W. (ed.). 1997. Roman Eloquence: Rhetoric in Society and Literature. New York: Routledge.
Dominik, W. 2007. “Tacitus and Pliny on Oratory.” In Dominik, and Hall, (eds.): 323–338.
Dominik, W. and Hall, J. (eds.). 2007. A Companion to Roman Rhetoric. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.CrossRef
Douglas, A. E. 1960. “Clausulae in the Rhetorica ad Herennium as Evidence of its Date.” CQ 10: 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, A. E. 1995. “Form and Content in the Tusculan Disputations.” In Powell, J. G. F. (ed.), Cicero the Philosopher: Twelve Papers: 197–218. New York and Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. 2005. Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self-Fashioning in the Rhetorical Works. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupont, F. 1997. “Recitatio and the Reorganization of the Space of Public Discourse.” In Habinek, T. N. and Schiesaro, A. (eds.), The Roman Cultural Revolution: 44–59. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DuPont, F. 1999. The Invention of Literature: From Greek Intoxication to the Latin Book. Trans. Lloyd, J.. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. 1993. The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, C. 1997. “Unspeakable Professions: Public Performance and Prostitution in Ancient Rome.” In Hallet, and Skinner, (eds.): 66–95.
Elder, J. P. 1966. “Catullus 1, his Poetic Creed, and Nepos.” HSCP 71: 143–149.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. 1979. A Commentary on Catullus. New York and London: Garland.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. 1996. Roman Literary Culture. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. 2004. The Roman World of Cicero'sDe Oratore. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, J. 2002. “Greek Lives and Roman Careers in the Classical Vita Tradition.” In Cheney, P. and Armas, F. A. (eds.), European Literary Careers: The Author from Antiquity to the Renaissance: 24–46. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. 1998. Spectacle and Society in Livy's History. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. 1987. Listening to the Cicadas. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finamore, J. F. 1984. “Catullus 50 and 51. Friendship, Love and Otium.” CW 78: 11–19.Google Scholar
Finley, M. 1973 (repr. 1985). The Ancient Economy. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. 1995. Catullan Provocations: Lyric Poetry and the Drama of Position. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Flores, E. 1976. “La dedica catulliana a Nepote e un epigramma di Cinna.” Vichiana 5: 3–18.Google Scholar
Flower, H. 1996. Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fordyce, C. J. 1961. Catullus: A Commentary. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Forsyth, P. 1976. “Tu cum Tappone: Catullus 104.” CW 70: 21–24.Google Scholar
Forsyth, P. 1984. “The Lady and the Poem: Catullus 35–42.” CJ 80.1: 24–26.Google Scholar
Forsyth, P. 1985. “Gifts and Giving: Catullus12–14.” CW 78.6: 571–574.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. 1989. “Cicero's Knowledge of the Rhetorical Treatises of Aristotle and Theophrastus.” In Fortenbaugh, W. and Steinmetz, P. (eds.), Cicero's Knowledge of the Peripatos: 39–60. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Foster, H. 1993. “The Art of Fetishism: Notes on Dutch Still Life.” In Apter, and Pietz, (eds.): 251–265.
Foster, H. 1990 (reissue). The History of Sexuality: The Use of Pleasure. Trans. Hurley, R.. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Frank, T. 1919. “Cicero and the Poetae Novi.” AJP 40.4: 396–415.Google Scholar
Frank, T. 1920. “Catullus and Horace on Suffenus and Alfenus.” CQ 14.3/4: 160–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, P. M. 1972. Ptolemaic Alexandria. 3 vols. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freud, S. 1953–1966. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. 24 vols. Trans. Strachey, James. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Friedricksmeyer, E. 1973. “Catullus 49, Cicero, and Caesar.” CP 68.4: 268–278.Google Scholar
Friedricksmeyer, E. 1985. “Catullus to Caecilius on Good Poetry.” AJP 106: 213–221.Google Scholar
Frier, B. W. 1999. Libri Annales Pontificum Maximorum: the Origins of the Annalistic Tradition. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geffcken, K. A. 1973. Comedy in the Pro Caelio. Mnemosyne Supplement 30. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Geffcken, K. A. 1995. Comedy in the Pro Caelio. With an Appendix on the In Clodium et Curionem. Wauconda, Ill.: Bolchazy-Carducci.Google Scholar
Georges, F. 1976. Deux Études sur Sartre. Paris: Bourgois.Google Scholar
Gernet, L. 1981. “‘Value’ in Greek Myth.” In Detienne, M. (ed.), Myth, Religion and Society. Trans. Gordon, R. L.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. 1995. Making Men: Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Godbout, J. T. and Caillé, A. 1998. The World of the Gift. Trans. Winkler, D.. Montreal, QC and Kingston, ON: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Goerler, W. 1988. “From Athens to Tusculum: Gleaning the Background of Cicero'sDe Oratore.” Rhetorica 6: 215–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, B. (ed.). 1982. Literary and Artistic Patronage in Ancient Rome. Austin, Tex.: University of Texas Press.
Gold, B. 1987. Literary Patronage in Greece and Rome. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2005. Constructing Literature in the Roman Republic: Poetry and Its Reception. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, W. 1973. The Princess Bride. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Gowing, A. 2000. “Memory and Silence in Cicero's Brutus.” Eranos 98: 39–64.Google Scholar
Graf, F. 1992. “Gestures and Conventions: The Gestures of Roman Actors and Orators.” In Bremmer, J. and Roodenburg, H. (eds.), A Cultural History of Gesture: 36–58. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Green, C. M. C. 1997. “Free as a Bird: Varro de Re Rustica 3.” AJP 118.3: 427–448.Google Scholar
Green, P. 1990. Alexander to Actium: The Historical Evolution of the Hellenistic Age. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Greene, E. 1995. “The Catullan Ego: Fragmentation and the Erotic Self.” AJP 116.1: 77–93.Google Scholar
Gregory, C. A. 1982. Gifts and Commodities. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. 1966. “Cicero and Licinius Calvus.” HSCP 71: 215–233.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. 1974. The Last Generation of the Roman Republic. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. 1992. Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. Cornell Ithaca, NY: University Press.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. 1996 (1990). Studies in Greek Culture and Roman Policy. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. 1996. “Catullus, Pliny, and Love-Letters.” TAPA 127: 201–231.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. 1994. “Ideology for an Empire in the Prefaces to Cicero's Dialogues.” Ramus 23: 55–67.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. 1998. The Politics of Latin Literature. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Haenni, R. 1905. Die literarische Kritik in CicerosBrutus. Samen: Müller.Google Scholar
Hakamies, R. 1951. Étude sur l'Origine et l'Évolution du Diminutif Latin et sa Survie Dans Les Langues Romanes. Helskinki: Finnish Academy of Science and Letters.Google Scholar
Hall, J. 1996. “Social Evasion and Aristocratic Manners.” AJP 117: 95–120.Google Scholar
Hallet, J. 1984. Fathers and Daughters in Roman Society: Women and the Elite Family. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallet, J. 1988. “Catullus on Composition: Response.” CW 81.5: 395–401.Google Scholar
Hallet, J. and Skinner, M. B. (eds.). 1997. Roman Sexualities. Princeton University Press.
Hanssen, J. S. T. 1952. Latin Diminutives: A Semantic Study. Bergen: Grieg.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. 1983. “The Catullan Libellus.” Philologus 127: 218–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, J. J. 1997. “Inter tribunal et scaenam: Comedy and Rhetoric in Rome.” In Dominik, (ed.): 182–197.
Hunter, R. L. 1993. “Callimachean Echoes in Catullus 65.” ZPE 96: 179–182.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. 2003. “The Catullan Corpus, Greek Epigram, and the Poetry of Objects.” CQ 53.1: 206–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, L. 1983. The Gift: Imagination and the Erotic Life of Property. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Immerwahr, H. R. 1964. “Book Rolls on Attic Vases.” In Henderson, C. (ed.), Classical, Mediaeval and Renaissance Studies in Honor of B. L. Ullman: vol. 1, 17–48. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Google Scholar
Immerwahr, H. R. 1973. “More Book Rolls on Attic Vases.” AK 16: 143–147.Google Scholar
Irigaray, L. 1985. Speculum of the Other Woman. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Janan, M. 1994. “When the Lamp is Shattered”: Desire and Narrative in Catullus. Carbondale, Ill.: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Janson, T. 1964. Latin Prose Prefaces: Studies in Literary Conventions. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Jay, M. 1993. Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, R. C. 1967. “Otium, Catulle, tibi molestum est.” CJ 62.8: 363–365.Google Scholar
Johnson, T. and Dandeker, C. 1989. “Patronage: Relations and System.” In Wallace-Hadrill, (ed.): 219–242.
Kaiser, L. M. 1950. “Waves and Color in Catullus 65.” CB 27: 2.Google Scholar
Kaplan, A. E. 1983. Women and Film: Both Sides of the Camera. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. 1972. The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World, 300 B.C. – A.D. 300. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. 1982. “Books and Readers in the Roman World.” In Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. V. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Classical Literature. Vol. II: Latin Literature: 3–32. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kierdorf, W. 1980. Laudatio Funebris: Interpretationen und Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung der römischen Leichenrede. Meisenheim am Glahn: Anton Hain.Google Scholar
King, J. K. 1988. “Catullus' Callimachean carmina, cc. 65–116.”CW 81.5: 383–394.Google Scholar
Kinsey, T. E. 1966. “Catullus 16.” Latomus 24: 101–106.Google Scholar
Kirby, J. T. 1997. “Ciceronian Rhetoric: Theory and Practice.” In Dominik, (ed.): 13–31.
Knobloch, J. 1969. “Catullus 53.5 and Cicero.” RhM 112: 23–9.Google Scholar
Kopytoff, I. 1986. “The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as Process.” In Appadurai, A. (ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective: 64–91. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krips, H. 1999. Fetish: An Erotics of Culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Krostenko, B. A. 2001. Cicero, Catullus and the Language of Display. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kundera, M. 1997. Slowness: A Novel. Trans. Asher, L.. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. V. 1991. The Traffic in Praise: Pindar and the Poetics of Social Economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kuttner, A. 2005. “Cabinet Fit for a Queen: The Lithika as Posidippus' Gem Museum.” In Gutzwiller, K. (ed.), The New Posidippus: A Hellenistic Poetry Book: 141–163. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kytzler, B. 1973. “Ciceros literarische Leistung in Brutus.” In Kytzler, B. (ed.), Ciceros literarische Leistung: 460–488. Darmstadt. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Penna, A. 2002. “Ritratti delle Lettere di Cicerone.” In Narducci, E. (ed.), Interpretare Cicerone: 1–23. Florence: F. le Monnier.Google Scholar
Lacan, J. 1977. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Sheridan, A.. New York. Norton.Google Scholar
Laughton, E. 1970. “Disertissime Romuli Nepotum.” CP 65: 1–7.Google Scholar
Laurand, L. 1927–1928. Études sur le style des discours de Cicéron. Paris: Société d'édition “Les Belles Lettres.”Google Scholar
Laursen, S. 1989. “The Apple of Catullus 65: A Love Pledge of Callimachus.” CM 40: 161–169.Google Scholar
Laursen, S. 1999. “Ciceronian ‘Bi-Marcus’: Correspondence with M. Terentius Varro and L. Parpirius Paetus in 46 B.C.E.” TAPA 129: 139–180.Google Scholar
Lee, G. 1990. Catullus. The Complete Poems. OxfordUniversity Press.Google Scholar
Leeman, A. D. 1978. “Enstehung und Bestimmung von Ciceros De Oratore.” Mnemosyne 31: 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. 1969. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Trans. Belle, J. H. and Sturmer, J. R.. Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Linderski, J. 1985. “The Dramatic Date of Varro, De Re Rustica, Book III and the Elections in 54.” Historia 34.2: 248–254.Google Scholar
MacKay, L. A. 1933. “Catullus 53.5 ‘di magni, salapantium disertum.’” CR 47: 220.Google Scholar
MacKendrick, P. 1989. The Philosophical Books of Cicero. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Marcovich, M. 1982. “Catullus 13 and Philodemus 23.” QUCC 11: 131–138.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1981. Capital, Vol. 1: A Critique of Political Economy. Trans. Fowkes, B.. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Mauss, M. 1990 (1954). The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. Trans. Halls, W. D.. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
May, J. M. 1988. Trials of Character: The Eloquence of Ciceronian Ethos. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minyard, J. D. 1988. “The Source of the Catulli Veronensis Liber.” CW 81.5: 343–354.Google Scholar
Morris, I. 1976. “Gift and Commodity in Archaic Greece.” Man 21: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulvey, L. 1989. Visual and Other Pleasures. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murgia, C. E. “Catullus 65 and Quintilian.” Transcript of a lecture delivered at Harvard University; cited with permission of the author.
Murphy, T. 1998. “Cicero's First Readers: Epistolary Evidence for the Dissemination of his Works.” CQ 48.2: 492–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nappa, C. 1998. “Place Settings. Convivium, Contrast, and Persona in Catullus 12 and 13.” AJP 119.3: 385–397.Google Scholar
Nappa, C. 2001. Aspects of Catullus' Social Fiction. Frankfurt: Lang.Google Scholar
Narducci, E. 1997. Cicerone e l'eloquenza Romana. Rome: Laterza.Google Scholar
Nielsen, R. M. 1987. “Catullus and Sal (poem 10).” AC 56: 148–161.Google Scholar
Noonan, J. D. 1979. “Mala Bestia in Catullus 69.7–8.” CW 73: 155–164.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. 1997. “The Erotics of Amicitia: Readings in Tibullus, Propertius, and Horace.” In Hallet, and Skinner, (eds.): 151–171.
Oliensis, E. 1998. Horace and the Rhetoric of Authority. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padilla, M. W. 2000. “Gifts of Humiliation.” AJP 121 (2): 179–211.Google Scholar
Palmer, L. R. 1956. “The Concept of Social Obligation in Indo-European.” In Homages à Max Niedermann. Collection Latomus 23: 258–269. Brussels.Google Scholar
Parry, J. and Bloch, M. (eds.). 1989. Money and the Morality of Exchange. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Paxson, H. J. 1994. The Poetics of Personification. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxson, H. J. 1998. “Personification's Gender.” Rhetorica 16 (2): 149–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearcy, L. T. 1994. “The Personification of the Text and Augustan Poetics in Epistles 1.20.” CW 87: 457–464.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. 1968. History of Classical Scholarship from the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. J. 1986. “Atticus and the Publication of Cicero's Works.” CW 79: 227–237.Google Scholar
Pietz, W. 1985. “The Problem of the Fetish, I.” Res 9 (Spring): 12–13.Google Scholar
Pietz, W. 1987. “The Problem of the Fetish, II.” Res 13 (Spring): 23–45.Google Scholar
Pietz, W. 1993. “Fetishism and Materialism: The Limits of Theory in Marx.” In Apter, and Pietz, (eds.): 119–151.
Pinsky, R. 1996. The Inferno of Dante: A New Verse Translation. New York: Noonday Press.Google Scholar
Plasberg, O. 1892. De M. Tullii Ciceronis Hortensio dialogo. Leipzig: Fock.Google Scholar
Pontani, P. 2000. “The First Word of Callimachus' Aetia.” ZPE 128: 57–59.Google Scholar
Purser, L. C. 1892. “Review: Plasberg on the Hortensius of Cicero.” CR 6.10: 448–450.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. 1982. Essays in Latin Lyric, Elegiac and Epic. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Quilligan, M. 1991. The Allegory of Female Authority: Christine de Pisan's “Cité des Dames.” Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, K. 1979. Texts and Contexts: The Roman Writers and their Audience. Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Raheja, G. C. 1988. The Poison in the Gift: Ritual, Prestation, and the Dominant Caste in a North Indian Village. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rathofer, C. 1986. Ciceros “Brutus” als literarisches Paradigma eines Auctoritas-Verhältnisses. Meisenheim: Hain.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. 1985. Intellectual Life in the Late Roman Republic. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, B. 1999. Printing, Writers and Readers in Renaissance Italy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, L., Jr. 1992. A New Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. 1981. “The Meaning of Irrumare in Catullus and Martial.” CP 76: 40–46.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. 1992. The Garden of Priapus: Sexuality and Aggression in Roman Humor. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. 1997. “Gender and Rhetoric: Producing Manhood in the Schools.” In Dominik, (ed.): 90–110.
Ridley, R. T. 1983. “Falsi Triumphi, Plures Consulatus.” Latomus 42: 372–382.Google Scholar
Roman, L. 2001. “The Representation of Literary Materiality in Martial's Epigrams.” JRS 91: 113–145.Google Scholar
Roth, P. 1993. “The Theme of Corrupted Xenia in Aeschylus' Oresteia.” Mnemosyne 46: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruppert, J. 1911. Quaestiones ad historiam dedicationis librorum pertinentes. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Sailor, D., and Stroup, S. C. 1999. “ΦΘΟΝΟΣ Δ᾽ ΑΠΕΣΤΩ: The Translation of Transgression in Aiskhylos' Agamemnon.” ClAnt 18.1: 153–182.Google Scholar
Saller, R. P. 1982. Personal Patronage Under the Early Empire. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saller, R. P. 1989. “Patronage and Friendship in Early Imperial Rome: Drawing the Distinction.” In Wallace-Hadrill, (ed.): 49–62.
Sandulescu, C. 1970. “Cicero und Homer.” StudClas 12: 53–68.Google Scholar
Sandy, G. N. 1978. “Indebtedness, ‘scurrilitas,’ and Composition in Catullus (44, 1, 68).” Phoenix 32.1: 68–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkisan, J. 1983. Catullus 68. An Interpretation. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Sartre, J. P. 1956. Being and Nothingness. An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. Trans. Barnes, H. E.. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
Saunders, C. 1944. “The Nature of Rome's Early Appraisal of Greek Culture.” CP 39.4: 209–217.Google Scholar
Schenker, D. J. 2006. “The Strangeness of the Phaedrus.” AJP 127: 67–87.Google Scholar
Scherf, J. 1966. Untersuchungen zur antiken Veröffentlichung der Catullgedichte. Spudasmata 61 Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Schrift, A. D. (ed.). 1997. The Logic of the Gift. Toward an Ethic of Generosity. New York: Routledge.
Schwabe, L. 1862. Quaestiones Catullianae. Giessen: Ricker.Google Scholar
Sciarrino, E. 2004. “Putting Cato the Censor's Origines in its Place.” ClAnt 23.2: 323–357.Google Scholar
Scott, W. C. 1969. “Catullus and Calvus (Cat. 50).” CP 64.3: 169–173.Google Scholar
Seaford, R. 1994. Reciprocity and Ritual: Homer and Tragedy in the Developing City-State. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Seager, R. 1974. “Venustus, lepidus, bellus, salsus: Notes on the Language of Catullus.” Latomus 33: 891–894.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, W. B. 1947. “Catullus X: A Rambling Commentary.” GR 16: 108–114.Google Scholar
Segal, C. 1970. “Catullan Otiosi: the Lover and the Poet.” GR 17: 25–31.Google Scholar
Sherwin-White, A. N. 1985. The Letters of Pliny: A Historical and Social Commentary. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Singleton, D. 1972. “A Note on Catullus' First Poem.” CP 67.3: 192–196.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. (ed.). 2007. A Companion to Catullus. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.CrossRef
Spitzer, P. 1993. “Les Xénia, morceaux sacrés d'hospitalité.” REG 106: 599–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stafford, E. 2000. Worshipping Virtues: Personification and the Divine in Ancient Greece. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Starr, R. J. 1987. “The Circulation of Literary Texts in the Roman World.” CQ 37: 213–223.Google Scholar
Steel, C. E. W. 2001. Cicero, Rhetoric, and Empire. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steiner, D. 1994. The Tyrant's Writ: Myths and Images of Writing in Ancient Greece. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, A. F. 1997. Art, Desire, and the Body in Ancient Greece. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, S. 1993. On Longing: Narratives of the Miniature, the Gigantic, the Souvenir, the Collection. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, M. 1988. The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia (Studies in Melanesian Anthropology 6). Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strodach, G. K. 1933. “Latin Dimunitives in –ello/a- and –illo/a-.” Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Stroup, S. C. 2003. “Adulta Virgo: The Personification of Textual Eloquence in Cicero's Brutus.” MD 50: 115–140.Google Scholar
Stroup, S. C. 2006. “Invaluable Collections: The Illusion of Poetic Presence in Martial's Xenia and Apophoreta.” In Nauta, R. R., Dam, H.-J., and Smolenaars, J. J. L. (eds.), Flavian Poetry: 299–313. Leiden. Brill.Google Scholar
Stroup, S. C. 2007. “Greek Rhetoric Meets Rome: Expansion, Resistance, and Acculturation.” In Dominik, and Hall, (eds.): 23–37.CrossRef
Sullivan, J. 1991. Martial: The Unexpected Classic. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, G. V. 1973. The Orators in Cicero's Brutus: Prosopography and Chronology. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Svenbro, J. 1993. Phrasikleia: An Anthropology of Reading in Ancient Greece. Trans. Lloyd, J.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Tatum, W. J. 1988. “Catullus' Criticism of Cicero in Poem 49.” TAPA 188: 179–184.Google Scholar
Tatum, W. J. 1997. “Friendship, Politics, and Literature in Catullus: Poems 1, 65 and 66, 116.” CQ 47 (2): 482–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, L. 1993. “Friendship and Other Loves.” In Badhwar, N. K. (ed.), Friendship: A Philosophical Reader: 48–72. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. F. S. 1967. “Catullus and Cicero: Poetry and the Criticism of Poetry.” CW 60: 225–230.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. F. S. (ed.). 1997. Catullus. University of Toronto Press.
Toner, J. P. 1995. Leisure in Ancient Rome. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Townend, G. B. 1980. “A Further Point in Catullus' Attack on Volusius.” GR 27: 134–136.Google Scholar
Turner, E. G. 1968. Greek Papyri. An Introduction. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usener, H. 1901. “Italische Volksjustiz.” RhM 56: 1–28.Google Scholar
Sickle, J. 1968. “About Form and Feeling in Catullus 65.” TAPA 99: 487–508.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. 1990. Myth and Society in Ancient Greece. New York: Zone.Google Scholar
Ville, G. 1981. La gladiature en Occident des origines a la mort de Domitien. Rome: Ecole française de Rome.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volkmann, R. E. 1885. Die Rhetorik der Griechen und Römer. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Vollmer, E. 1892. Laudationum funebrium Romanorum historia et reliquiarum editio. Jahrbücher fur Klassiche Philologie Suppl. 18: 445–528.
Walde, A., and Hofmann, J. B. 1965. Lateinisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch. Vierte Auflage. Heidelberg. C. Winter.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (ed.). 1989. Patronage in Ancient Society. New York: Routledge.
Waltz, R. 1909. Vie de Sénèque. Paris: Perrin.Google Scholar
Weiss, M. 1996. “An Oscanism in Catullus 53.” CP 91.4: 353–359.Google Scholar
White, P. 1974. “The Presentation and Dedication of the Silvae and the Epigrams.” JRS 64: 40–64.Google Scholar
White, P. 1978. “Amicitia and the Profession of Poetry in Early Imperial Rome.” JRS 68: 74–92.Google Scholar
White, P. 1982. “Positions for Poets in Early Imperial Rome.” In Gold, (ed.): 50–66.
White, P. 1993. Promised Verse. Poets in the Society of Augustan Rome. New Haven, Conn.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, P. 1982. “Phases in Political Patronage of Literature in Rome.” In Gold, (ed.): 3–27.
White, P. (ed.). 2003. Seneca. De Otio, de Breuitate Vitae. Cambridge University Press.
Winkel, L. C. 1979. “Some Remarks on the Date of the Rhetorica ad Herennium.” Mnemosyne 32: 327–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirszubski, C. 1954. “Cicero's Cum Dignitate Otium: A Reconsideration.” JRS 44: 1–13.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1974a. Cinna the Poet and other Roman Essays. Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1974b. “Catullus 68.157.” CR 24: 6–7.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1980. “Looking for Camerius: The Topography of Catullus 55.” PBSR 48: 6–16.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1982. “Pete nobiles amicos: Poets and Patrons in Late Republican Rome.” In Gold (ed.): 28–49.
Wohl, V. 1998. Intimate Commerce: Exchange, Gender and Subjectivity in Greek Tragedy. Austin, Tex.: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Wood, N. 1988. Cicero's Social and Political Thought. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. 1966. “Some Implications of otium in Catullus 51.13–16.” Latomus 24: 217–226.Google Scholar
Wray, D. 2001. Catullus and the Poetics of Manhood. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, M. 1998. “Fetishizing the Fetish.” Bad Subjects 41 (online publication) (“Fetish”).Google Scholar
Wyke, M. 1987. “Written Women: Propertius' Scripta Puella.” JRS 77: 47–61.Google Scholar
Zagagi, N. 1982. “A Note on munus, munus fungi in Early Latin.” Glotta 60: 281.Google Scholar
Zagagi, N. 1987. “Amatory Gifts and Payments: A Note on Munus, donum and data in Plautus.” Glotta 65: 129–132.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. 1993. “The Hellenistic Grave Stelai from Smyrna: Identity and Self-Image in the Polis.” In Bulloch, A. W., Gruen, E. S., Long, A. A., and Stewart, A. (eds.), Images and Ideologies: 212–230. Berkeley. Calif.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. 1995. The Mask of Socrates. The Image of the Intellectual in Antiquity. Trans. Shapiro, A.. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. 1982. “The Poetics of Patronage in the Late First Century B. C.” In Gold, (ed.): 87–102.
Zetzel, J. E. G. 2003. “Plato with Pillows: Cicero on the Uses of Greek Culture.” In Braund, D. and C. Gill, (eds.), Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome: Studies in Honour of T. P. Wiseman: 119–138. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.Google Scholar
Zicàri, M. 1965. “Sul primo carme di Catullo.” Maia 17: 232–240.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Sarah Culpepper Stroup, University of Washington
  • Book: Catullus, Cicero, and a Society of Patrons
  • Online publication: 04 August 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730177.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Sarah Culpepper Stroup, University of Washington
  • Book: Catullus, Cicero, and a Society of Patrons
  • Online publication: 04 August 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730177.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Sarah Culpepper Stroup, University of Washington
  • Book: Catullus, Cicero, and a Society of Patrons
  • Online publication: 04 August 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730177.016
Available formats
×