Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T17:26:10.704Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Ovarian Cancer Screening

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2009

Adam Rosenthal
Affiliation:
Clinical Lecturer and Subspecialty Fellow in Gynaecological Oncology.
Usha Menon
Affiliation:
Clinical Lecturer and Subspecialty Fellow in Gynaecological Oncology.
Ian Jacobs
Affiliation:
Clinical Lecturer and Subspecialty Fellow in Gynaecological Oncology.
Rodney Reznek
Affiliation:
St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Ovarian cancer remains not only the commonest but also the most lethal gynaecological malignancy in the UK (Table 3.1 [1]).

Despite advances in molecular biology, surgery and chemotherapy, ovarian cancer remains a difficult condition to manage and long-term survival rates have hardly improved since the 1970s [2]. The poor prognosis of the disease is believed to be due to the fact that more than 70% of women present with disease spread beyond the ovaries (Table 3.2 [3]). This probably reflects the absence of major symptoms in early stage disease, due to the location of the ovaries, which results in little interference with surrounding structures until ovarian enlargement is considerable or metastatic disease supervenes. When symptoms occur, they may be non-specific, requiring frequent consultations with a GP before further investigation is prompted. However, it should be noted that most stage I ovarian cancers have an extremely good prognosis following surgery alone. Detection of early stage disease may therefore offer an opportunity to reduce mortality. However, so far, no screening protocol for ovarian cancer has been shown to achieve this aim. Nevertheless, developments in ultrasound and tumour marker technology, combined with more sophisticated approaches to interpretation have improved the performance of the potential screening strategies to levels which may reduce mortality. These strategies are currently being tested in two large randomised controlled trials of ovarian cancer screening; one in the UK [4] and one in the USA [5]. However, neither of these is expected to report before 2012.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Office of National Statistics. Cancer Statistics Registrations 2001. Series MB1, No. 32. HMSO, London. http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_health/MB1_32/MB1_32.pdf
Barnholtz-Sloan, J. S., Schwartz, A. G., Qureshi, F., et al. Ovarian cancer: changes in patterns at diagnosis and relative survival over the last three decades. Am J Obstet Gynecol (2003), 189:1120–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics), annual report on the results of treatment in gynecological cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet (2003), 83 (Suppl 1 ix–xxii): 1–229.
UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening. http://www.ukctocs.org.uk/
Buys, S. S., Partridge, E., Greene, M. H., et al. PLCO Project Team. Ovarian cancer screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial: findings from the initial screen of a randomised trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol (2005), 193:1630–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, I. and Oram, D.. Screening for ovarian cancer. Biomed and Pharmacother (1988), 42:589–96.Google ScholarPubMed
Bast, R. C. Jr, Feeney, M., Lazarus, H., et al. Reactivity of a monoclonal antibody with human ovarian carcinoma. J Clin Invest (1981), 68:1331–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zurawski, V. R. Jr, Knapp, R. C., Einhorn, N., et al. An initial analysis of preoperative serum CA 125 levels in patients with early stage ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol (1988), 30:7–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zurawski, V. R. Jr, Orjaseter, H., Andersen, A., et al. Elevated serum CA 125 levels prior to diagnosis of ovarian neoplasia: relevance for early detection of ovarian cancer. Int J Cancer (1988), 42:677–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobs, I. and Bast, R. C. Jr.The CA 125 tumour-associated antigen: a review of the literature. Hum Reprod (1989), 4:1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silberstein, L. B., Rosenthal, A. N., Coppack, S. W., et al. Ascites and a raised serum CA 125 – confusing combination. J Royal Soc Med (2001), 94:581–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, I. J., Skates, S. J., MacDonald, N., et al. Screening for ovarian cancer: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Lancet (1999), 353:1207–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skates, S. J., Menon, U., MacDonald, N., et al. Calculation of the risk of ovarian cancer from serial CA-125 values for preclinical detection in postmenopausal women. J Clin Oncol (2003), 21 (Suppl 10):206–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menon, U., Skates, S. J., Lewis, S., et al. A prospective study using the risk of ovarian cancer algorithm to screen for ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol (2005), 23:719–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menon, U. and Jacobs, I. J.. Tumour markers and screening. In J. S. Berek and N. F. Hacker, eds., Practical Gynaecologic Oncology, 4th edition (Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 2005), pp. 43–66.Google Scholar
Petricoin, E. F., Ardekani, A. M., Hitt, B. A., et al. Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer. Lancet (2002), 359:572–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sorace, J. M. and Zhan, M.. A data review and re-assessment of ovarian cancer serum proteomic profiling. BMC Bioinformatics (2003), 4:24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diamandis, E. P.. Mass spectrometry as a diagnostic and a cancer biomarker discovery tool: opportunities and potential limitations. Mol Cell Proteomics (2004), 3:367–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villanueva, J., Philip, J., Entenberg, D., et al. Serum peptide profiling by magnetic particle-assisted, automated sample processing and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Anal Chem (2004), 76:1560–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Z., , R. C. Bast Jr, Yu, Y., et al. Three biomarkers identified from serum proteomic analysis for the detection of early stage ovarian cancer. Cancer Res (2004), 64:5882–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ye, B., Cramer, D. W., Skates, S. J., et al. Haptoglobin-alpha subunit as potential serum biomarker in ovarian cancer: identification and characterization using proteomic profiling and mass spectrometry. Clin Cancer Res (2003), 9:2904–11.Google ScholarPubMed
Campbell, S., Bhan, V., Royston, P., et al. Transabdominal ultrasound screening for ovarian cancer. Br Med J (1989), 299:1363–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DePriest, P. D., Shenson, D., Fried, A., et al. A morphology index based on sonographic findings in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol (1993), 51:7–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Modesitt, S. C., Pavlik, E. J., Ueland, F. R., et al. Risk of malignancy in unilocular ovarian cystic tumors less than 10 centimeters in diameter. Obstet Gynecol (2003), 102:594–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Kurjak, A., Schulman, H., Sosic, A., et al. Transvaginal ultrasound, color flow, and Doppler waveform of the postmenopausal adnexal mass. Obstet Gynecol (1992), 80:917–21.Google ScholarPubMed
Einhorn, N., Sjovall, K., Knapp, R. C., et al. Prospective evaluation of serum CA125 levels for early detection of ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol (1992), 80:14–18.Google Scholar
Jacobs, I. J., Skates, S., Davies, A. P., et al. Risk of diagnosis of ovarian cancer after raised serum CA 125 concentration: a prospective cohort study. Br Med J (1996), 313:1355–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adonakis, G. L., Paraskevaidis, E., Tsiga, S., et al. A combined approach for the early detection of ovarian cancer in asymptomatic women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol (1996), 65:221–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grover, S., Quinn, M. A., Weidman, P., et al. Screening for ovarian cancer using serum CA125 and vaginal examination: report on 2550 females. Int J Gynecol Cancer (1995), 5:291–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagell, J. R. Jr, DePriest, P. D., Reedy, M. B., et al. The efficacy of transvaginal sonographic screening in asymptomatic women at risk for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol (2000), 77:350–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sato, S., Yokoyama, Y., Sakamoto, T., et al. Usefulness of mass screening for ovarian carcinoma using transvaginal ultrasonography. Cancer (2000), 89:582–8.3.0.CO;2-#>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayashi, H., Yaginuma, Y., Kitamura, S., et al. Bilateral oophorectomy in asymptomatic women over 50 years old selected by ovarian cancer screening. Gynecol Obstet Invest (1999), 47:58–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabor, A., Jensen, F. R., Bock, J. E., et al. Feasibility study of a randomised trial of ovarian cancer screening. J Med Screen (1994), 1:215–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millo, R., Facca, M. C. and Alberico, S.. Sonographic evaluation of ovarian volume in postmenopausal women: a screening test for ovarian cancer?Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol (1989), 16:72–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Goswamy, R. K., Campbell, S. and Whitehead, M. I.. Screening for ovarian cancer. Clin Obstet Gynaecol (1983), 10:621–43.Google ScholarPubMed
Kurjak, A. and Kupesic, S.. Transvaginal color Doppler and pelvic tumor vascularity: lessons learned and future challenges. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol (1995), 6:145–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vuento, M. H., Pirhonen, J. P., Makinen, J. I., et al. Evaluation of ovarian findings in asymptomatic postmenopausal women with color Doppler ultrasound. Cancer (1995), 76:1214–8.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parkes, C. A., Smith, D., Wald, N. J., et al. Feasibility study of a randomised trial of ovarian cancer screening among the general population. J Med Screen (1994), 1:209–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holbert, T. R.. Screening transvaginal ultrasonography of postmenopausal women in a private office setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol (1994), 170:1699–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beral, V., Fraser, P. and Chilvers, C.. Does pregnancy protect against ovarian cancer?Lancet (1978), 1:1083–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, M., Lerman, C., Daly, M., et al. Utilization of ovarian cancer screening by women at increased risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (1995), 4:269–73.Google ScholarPubMed
Kew, F. M., Ashton, V. J. and Cruickshank, D.J.. Tolerability of transvaginal ultrasonography as an ovarian cancer screening test. J Med Screen (2004), 11:45–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drescher, C. W., Nelson, J., Peacock, S., et al. Compliance of average- and intermediate-risk women to semiannual ovarian cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2004), 13:600–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Hogg, R. and Friedlander, M.. Biology of epithelial ovarian cancer: implications for screening women at high genetic risk. J Clin Oncol (2004), 22:1315–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobs, I. J.. Screening for familial ovarian cancer: the need for well-designed prospective studies. J Clin Oncol (2005), 23:5443–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiner, Z., Beck, D., Steiner, M., et al. Screening for ovarian cancer in women with breast cancer with transvaginal sonography and color flow imaging. J Ultrasound Med (1993), 12:387–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muto, M. G., Cramer, D. W., Brown, D. L., et al. Screening for ovarian cancer: the preliminary experience of a familial ovarian cancer center. Gynecol Oncol (1993), 51:12–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belinson, J. L., Okin, C., Casey, G., et al. The familial ovarian cancer registry: progress report. Cleve Clin J Med (1995), 62:129–34.Google ScholarPubMed
Menkiszak, J., Jakubowska, A., Gronwald, J., et al. Hereditary ovarian cancer: summary of 5 years of experience. [Polish]Ginekol Pol (1998), 69:283–7.Google Scholar
Karlan, B. Y., Raffel, L. J., Crvenkovic, G., et al. A multidisciplinary approach to the early detection of ovarian carcinoma: rationale, protocol design, and early results. Am J Obstet Gynecol (1993), 169:494–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karlan, B. Y., Baldwin, R. L., Lopez-Luevanos, E., et al. Peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma, a phenotypic variant of familial ovarian cancer: implications for ovarian cancer screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol (1999), 180:917–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dorum, A., Kristensen, G. B., Abeler, V. M., et al. Early detection of familial ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer (1996), 32A:1645–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dorum, A., Heimdal, K., Lovslett, K., et al. Prospectively detected cancer in familial breast/ovarian cancer screening. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand (1999), 78:906–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, K. J. and Schwartz, P. E.. Cancer screening in a high risk population: a clinical trial. Ultrasound Med Biol (2001), 27:461–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheuer, L., Kauff, N., Robson, M., et al. Outcome of preventive surgery and screening for breast and ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol (2002), 20:1260–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laframboise, S., Nedelcu, R., Murphy, J., et al. Use of CA-125 and ultrasound in high-risk women. Int J Gynecol Cancer (2002), 12:86–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liede, A., Karlan, B. Y., Baldwin, R. L., et al. Cancer incidence in a population of Jewish women at risk of ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol (2002), 20:1570–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tailor, A., Bourne, T. H., Campbell, S., et al. Results from an ultrasound-based familial ovarian cancer screening clinic: a 10-year observational study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol (2003), 21:378–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fries, M.H., Hailey, B. J., Flanagan, J., et al. Outcome of five years of accelerated surveillance in patients at high risk for inherited breast/ovarian cancer: report of a phase II trial. Mil Med (2004), 169:411–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stirling, D., Evans, D. G., Pichert, G., et al. Screening for familial ovarian cancer: failure of current protocols to detect ovarian cancer at an early FIGO stage. J Clin Oncol (2005), 23:5588–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivier, R. I., Lubsen-Brandsma, M. A., Verhoef, S., et al. CA125 and transvaginal ultrasound monitoring in high-risk women cannot prevent the diagnosis of advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol (2006), 100:20–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urban, N., Drescher, C., Etzioni, R., et al. Use of a stochastic simulation model to identify an efficient protocol for ovarian cancer screening. Control Clin Trials (1997), 18:251–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Ovarian Cancer Screening
    • By Adam Rosenthal, Clinical Lecturer and Subspecialty Fellow in Gynaecological Oncology., Usha Menon, Clinical Lecturer and Subspecialty Fellow in Gynaecological Oncology., Ian Jacobs, Clinical Lecturer and Subspecialty Fellow in Gynaecological Oncology.
  • Edited by Rodney Reznek
  • Book: Cancer of the Ovary
  • Online publication: 11 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511545887.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Ovarian Cancer Screening
    • By Adam Rosenthal, Clinical Lecturer and Subspecialty Fellow in Gynaecological Oncology., Usha Menon, Clinical Lecturer and Subspecialty Fellow in Gynaecological Oncology., Ian Jacobs, Clinical Lecturer and Subspecialty Fellow in Gynaecological Oncology.
  • Edited by Rodney Reznek
  • Book: Cancer of the Ovary
  • Online publication: 11 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511545887.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Ovarian Cancer Screening
    • By Adam Rosenthal, Clinical Lecturer and Subspecialty Fellow in Gynaecological Oncology., Usha Menon, Clinical Lecturer and Subspecialty Fellow in Gynaecological Oncology., Ian Jacobs, Clinical Lecturer and Subspecialty Fellow in Gynaecological Oncology.
  • Edited by Rodney Reznek
  • Book: Cancer of the Ovary
  • Online publication: 11 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511545887.005
Available formats
×