Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Print publication year: 2019
  • Online publication date: May 2019

8 - Congress at Work

from Part II - Procedural Anxieties


Scholars and observers worry that Congress has lost its capacity to perform its functions in the American political system. Drawing on an array of data on Congress’s activities and processes along with in-depth interviews with long-serving lawmakers and high-level staffers, we take stock of how changes to internal processes have affected Congress’s institutional capacities. In doing so, we make two interrelated arguments. First, we argue that Congress can take transformative action whether the legislative process is centralized and leadership-led or whether it is decentralized and committee-led. Second, we argue that Congress is better able than in previous eras to engage in conflict-clarifying representation in order to express and educate the public on the positions of the parties. We conclude that changes to congressional processes in recent years should be viewed as adaptations to the challenges of contemporary lawmaking. These adaptations help preserve Congress’s institutional capacity, but they have undoubtedly had negative consequences for open deliberation and individual member input into legislation.

Abramowitz, Alan I. 2010. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Adler, E. Scott, and Wilkerson, John D.. 2012. Congress and the Politics of Problem Solving. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Aldrich, John H., and Rohde, David W.. 2000. “The Consequences of Party Organization in the House: The Role of the Majority and the Minority Parties in Conditional Party Government.” In Bond, Jon R. and Fleisher, Richard (eds.), Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era. Washington, DC: CQ Press, pp. 3172.
APSA Committee on Parties. 1950. “Towards a More Responsible Two-Party System.” Supplement, American Political Science Review 44(3).
Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D.. 2015. The Politics of Information: Problem Definition and the Course of Public Policy in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Barber, Michael J., and McCarty, Nolan. 2015. “Causes and Consequences of Polarization.” In Persily, Nathaniel (ed.), Solutions to Political Polarization in America. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1558.
Bartels, Larry M. 2000. “Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952–1996.” American Journal of Political Science 44(1): 3550.
Bendix, William. 2016. “Bypassing Congressional Committees: Parties, Panel Rosters, and Deliberative Processes.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 41(3): 687714.
Bessette, Joseph. 1994. The Mild Voice of Reason: Deliberative Democracy and American National Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Binder, Sarah A. 2003. Stalemate: Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
Binder, Sarah A.. 2014. “Polarized We Govern?” Center for Effective Public Management, Brookings Institution. Retrieved from (last accessed December 11, 2018).
Butler, Daniel M., and Powell, Eleanor Neff. 2014. “Understanding the Party Brand: Experimental Evidence on the Role of Valence.” Journal of Politics 76: 492505.
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Crespin, Michael H., and Madonna, Anthony J.. 2016. “New Directions in Legislative Research: Lessons from Inside Congress.” PS: Political Science and Politics 49(3): 473477.
Curry, James M. 2015. Legislating in the Dark: Information and Power in the House of Representatives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Curry, James M. 2016. “Knowledge, Expertise, and Committee Power in Congress.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 6–10, 2016.
Drutman, Lee. 2016. “Political Dynamism: A New Approach to Making Government Work Again.” Policy Paper, New America. Retrieved from (last accessed December 17, 2018).
Egar, William T. 2016. “Tarnishing Opponents, Polarizing Congress: The House Minority Party and the Construction of the Roll‐Call Record.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 41(4): 935964. DOI: 10.1111/lsq.12135.
Fenno, Richard F. 1962. “The House Appropriations Committee as a Political System: The Problem of Integration.” American Political Science Review 56(2): 310324.
Fiorina, Morris P., and Abrams, Samuel J.. 2009. Disconnect: The Breakdown of Representation in American Politics. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Gelman, Jeremy. 2017. “Rewarding Dysfunction: Interest Groups and Intended Legislative Failure.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 42(4): 661692.
Gerrity, Jessica C. 2014. “Understanding Congressional Approval: Public Opinion from 1974 to 2014.” The Evolving Congress. Committee on Rules and Administration. United States Senate. Washington, DC: U.S Government Printing Office, pp. 189216.
Gilligan, Thomas W., and Krehbiel, Keith. 1990. “Organization of Informative Committees by a Rational Legislature.” American Journal of Political, Science 34(2): 531564.
Gilmour, John B. 1995. Strategic Disagreement: Stalemate in American Politics. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Glassman, Matthew E., Straus, Jacob R., and Shogan, Colleen J.. 2010. Social Networking and Constituent Communication: Member Use of Twitter during a Two-Week Period in the 111th Congress. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, R40823, September 21, 2009.
Glassman, Matthew E. 2014. “Tweet Your Congressman: The Rise of Electronic Communications in Congress.” The Evolving Congress. Committee on Rules and Administration. United States Senate. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, pp. 95106.
Golbeck, Jennifer, Grimes, Justin M., and Rogers, Anthony. 2010. “Twitter Use by the U.S. Congress.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61(8): 16121621.
Grimmer, Justin. 2013. Representational Style in Congress: What Legislators Say and Why It Matters. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Grimmer, Justin, Westwood, Sean J., and Messing, Solomon. 2015. The Impression of Influence: Legislator Communication, Representation, and Democratic Accountability. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Groseclose, Tim, and McCarty, Nolan. 2001. “The Politics of Blame: Bargaining Before an Audience.” American Journal of Political Science 45: 100119.
Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis S.. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hall, Thad E. 2004. Authorizing Policy. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press.
Hamilton, Lee. 2008. “Congress Needs Proper Leadership.” Commentaries, Center on Congress. Bloomington: Indiana University.
Hanson, Peter. 2014. Too Weak to Govern: Majority Party Power and Appropriations in the U.S. Senate. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hanson, Peter. 2015. “Restoring the Regular Order in Congressional Appropriations.” New Ideas for Federal Budgeting: A Series of Working Papers for the National Budgeting Roundtable. Centers on the Public Service. School of Policy, Government and International Affairs. George Mason University.
Harris, Douglas B. 2005. “Orchestrating Party Talk: A Party-Based View of One-Minute Speeches in the House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30: 127141.
Hetherington, Marc J. 2001. “Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization.” American Political Science Review 95(3): 619631.
Huitt, Ralph K. 1961. “Democratic Party Leadership in the Senate.” American Political Science Review 55(2): 333344.
Jenkins, Jeffrey A., and Charles, Stewart III. 2016. “The Deinstitutionalization (?) of the House of Representatives: Reflections on Nelson Polsby’s ‘Institutionalization of the House of Representatives’ at Fifty,” Presented at the Congress & History Conference, Norman, Oklahoma, June 16–17, 2016.
Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Krutz, Glen S. 2005. Hitching a Ride: Omnibus Legislating in the U.S. Congress. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press.
Layman, Geoffrey C., Carsey, Thomas M., Green, John C., Herrera, Richard, and Cooperman, Rosalyn. 2010. “Activists and Conflict Extension in American Party Politics.” American Political Science Review 104(2): 324346.
Lee, Frances E. 2016. Insecure Majorities: Congress and the Perpetual Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levendusky, Matthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lewallen, Jonathan, Theriault, Sean M., and Jones, Bryan D.. 2016. “Congressional Dysfunction: An Information Processing Perspective.” Regulation and Governance 10(2): 179190.
Maass, Arthur. 1983. Congress and the Common Good. New York: Basic Books.
Mann, Thomas E., and Ornstein, Norman. 2006. The Broken Branch: How Congress Is Failing America and How to Get It Back on Track. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mann, Thomas E., and Ornstein, Norman. 2012. It’s Even Worse Than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided with the New Politics of Extremism. New York: Basic Books.
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Mayhew, David R. 2000. America’s Congress: Actions in the Public Sphere, James Madison through Newt Gingrich. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Mayhew, David R. 2005. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946–2002, 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Mill, John Stuart. 1975 [1861]. “Considerations on Representative Government.” In Three Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reynolds, Molly E. 2018. Vital Statistics on Congress. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Polsby, Nelson W. 1968. “The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review 62(1): 144168.
Polsby, Nelson W. 1975. “Legislatures.” In Greenstein, Fred I. and Polsby, Nelson W. (eds.) Handbook of Political Science. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Quirk, Paul J. 2005. “Deliberation and Decision Making.” In Binder, Sarah A. and Quirk, Paul J. (eds.), The Legislative Branch. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 314348.
Ramirez, Mark D. 2009. “The Dynamics of Partisan Conflict on Congressional Approval.” American Journal of Political Science, 53: 681694.
Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rosenthal, Alan. 2004. Heavy Lifting: The Job of the American Legislature. Washington: CQ Press.
Schattschneider, E. E. 1942. Party Government. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1988. “Representation and Governance: The Great Legislative Trade-Off.” Political Science Quarterly 103(3): 461484.
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1989. “The Changing Textbook Congress.” In Chubb, John and Peterson, Paul (eds.), Can the Government Govern? Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, pp. 238266.
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1987. “The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power.” American Political Science Review 81(1): 85104.
Shogan, Colleen J. 2010. “Blackberries, Tweets, and YouTube: Technology and the Future of Communicating with Congress: PS: Political Science & Politics 43(2): 231233.
Shogan, Colleen J. 2012. “Defense Authorization: The Senate’s Last Best Hope.” In Straus, Jacob R. (ed.), Party and Procedure in the United States Congress. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 195216.
Sinclair, Barbara. 1989. The Transformation of the U. S. Senate. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Sinclair, Barbara. 2016. Unorthodox Lawmaking: New Legislative Processes in the U.S. Congress, 5th edition. Washington: CQ Press.
Smith, Steven. 1989. Call to Order: Floor Politics in the House and Senate. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
Smith, Steven S. 2014. The Senate Syndrome: The Evolution of Procedural Warfare in the Modern U.S. Senate. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
Snowe, Olympia J. 2013. “The Effect of Modern Partisanship on Legislative Effectiveness in the 112th Congress.” Harvard Journal on Legislation 50(1): 2140.
Straus, Jacob R., Glassman, Matthew Eric, Shogan, Colleen J., and Smelcer, Susan Navarro. 2013. “Communicating in 140 Characters or Less: Congressional Adoption of Twitter in the 111th Congress.” PS: Political Science & Politics 4(1): 6066.
Theriault, Sean M. 2008. Party Polarization in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, Dennis S. 2008. “Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 497520.
Thurber, James A. 2011. “What Is Wrong with Congress and What Should Be Done about It.” In Morgan, Iwan and Davies, Philip John (eds.), Broken Government? Politics in the Obama Era. London: University of London/Institute for the Study of the Americas Press.
Tiefer, Charles. 2016. The Polarized Congress: The Post-Traditional Procedure of Its Current Struggles. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Volden, Craig, and Wiseman, Alan E.. 2014. Legislative Effectiveness in the United States Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wallner, James I. 2013. The Death of Deliberation: Partisanship and Polarization in the United States Senate. New York: Lexington Books.
Waxman, Henry with Green, Joshua. 2009. The Waxman Report: How Congress Really Works. New York: Twelve.
Wawro, Gregory. 2000. Legislative Entrepreneurship in the U.S. House of Representatives. Ann Arbor: MI: University of Michigan Press.