Book contents
- The Cambridge World HistoryVolume I
- The Cambridge World History
- The Cambridge World History
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Table
- Contributors
- Preface
- Book part
- 1 Introduction and overview
- Part I Historiography, method, and themes
- 2 Writing world history
- 3 The evolution of world histories
- 4 Evolution, rupture, and periodization
- 5 From divergence to convergence: centrifugal and centripetal forces in history
- 6 Belief, knowledge, and language
- 7 Historiography of technology and innovation
- 8 Fire and fuel in human history
- 9 Family history and world history: from domestication to biopolitics
- 10 Gendered world history
- 11 What does anthropology contribute to world history?
- 12 Migration in human history
- Part II The Paleolithic and the beginnings of human history
- Index
- References
9 - Family history and world history: from domestication to biopolitics
from Part I - Historiography, method, and themes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2015
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge World HistoryVolume I
- The Cambridge World History
- The Cambridge World History
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Maps
- Table
- Contributors
- Preface
- Book part
- 1 Introduction and overview
- Part I Historiography, method, and themes
- 2 Writing world history
- 3 The evolution of world histories
- 4 Evolution, rupture, and periodization
- 5 From divergence to convergence: centrifugal and centripetal forces in history
- 6 Belief, knowledge, and language
- 7 Historiography of technology and innovation
- 8 Fire and fuel in human history
- 9 Family history and world history: from domestication to biopolitics
- 10 Gendered world history
- 11 What does anthropology contribute to world history?
- 12 Migration in human history
- Part II The Paleolithic and the beginnings of human history
- Index
- References
Summary
Two concepts that are helpful in making connections between the history of the family and global history are "domestication" and "biopolitics". In the contemporary world, biopolitical programs have become standard techniques of rule. Family relations have long played a role in accounts of human origins, but those accounts have been changing over the last several decades. The focus of recent work by social archaeologists on early child nurturance is of special interest for making connections between family history and the development of early human societies. Family life-cyclical practices such as burial produced material reminders of connections between ancestors and descendants, and thus past, present, and future, providing a link between family life and the production of cosmologies and eventually religious systems of thought. Trans-oceanic explorations of the fifteenth century widened the range of cross-cultural encounters. Domestic intimacies and family reorganization resulted from and helped to build early modern commercial networks and empires.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge World History , pp. 208 - 233Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Primary Sources
Da Xue (The Great Learning), Legge, James (trans.), Chinese Text Project, accessed Feb. 27, 2013, http://ctext.org/liji/da-xue.Google Scholar
“The first letter of Christopher Columbus to the Noble Lord Raphael Sanchez, 13,” Open Library, accessed on Feb. 27, 2013, www.archive.org/stream/firstletterofchr00colu#page/n7/mode/2up.Google Scholar
Herodotus, , The Histories: Second Book: An Account of Egypt, Macaulay, G. C. (trans.), accessed on Feb. 27, 2013, www.gutenberg.org/files/2131/2131-h/2131-h.htm.Google Scholar
The Life of Buddha by Asvaghosa, Olivelle, Patrick (trans.), New York: New York University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Andaya, Barbara, “From temporary wife to prostitute: Sexuality and economic change in early modern Southeast Asia,” Journal of Women's History 9 (1998), 11–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolger, Diane, “Gender and human evolution,” in Nelson, Sarah Milledge (ed.), Handbook of Gender in Archaeology, Lanham, MD: AltaMira, 2006.Google Scholar
Clancy-Smith, Julia, and Frances, Gouda (eds.), Domesticating the Empire: Race, Gender, and Family Life in French and Dutch Colonialism, Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1998.Google Scholar
Desan, Suzanne, The Family on Trial in Revolutionary France, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Edward Ross, “Biopolitics, fascism, democracy: Some reflections on our discourse about ‘Modernity,’” Central European History 37 (2004), 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Suzanne, The Roman Family, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrante, Lucia, “Marriage and women's subjectivity in a patrilineal system: The case of early modern Bologna,” in Maynes, Mary Jo, et al. (eds.), Gender, Kinship and Power, New York: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–1978 (Lectures at the Collège de France), Burchell, Graham (trans.), New York: Picador, 2009.Google Scholar
Gamble, Clive, Origins and Revolutions: Human Identity in Earliest Prehistory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, Qiang, and Yun, Kuen Lee, “A biological perspective on Yangshao kinship,” Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 12 (1993), 266–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Rita, Buddhism after Patriarchy: A Feminist History, Analysis and Reconstruction of Buddhism, Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Grubbs, Judith Evans, Women and the Law in the Roman Empire: A Sourcebook on Marriage, Divorce and Widowhood, New York: Routledge, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, Ian, The Domestication of Europe: Structure and Contingency in Neolithic Societies, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1990.Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian, “This old house,” Natural History, June 2006, accessed March 6, 2013, www.naturalhistorymag.com/htmlsite/0606/0606_feature.html.Google Scholar
Hunt, Lynn, The Family Romance of the French Revolution, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Joyce, Rosemary, Gender and Power in Prehispanic Mesoamerica, Austin: University of Texas Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Katzew, Ilona, Casta Paintings: Images of Race in Eighteenth-century Mexico, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Kellog, Susan, Law and Transformation of the Aztec Culture, Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Kühl, Stefan, The Nazi Connection: Eugenics, American Racism, and German National Socialism, New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Kuznezof, Elizabeth Anne, “Slavery and childhood in Brazil (1550–1888),” in Gonzalez, Ondina E. and Premo, Bianca (eds.), Raising an Empire: Children in Early Modern Iberia and Colonial Latin America, Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Levine, Philippa, Prostitution, Race, and Politics: Policing Venereal Disease in the British Empire, New York: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
Lyons, Diane, “A critical appraisal of gender research in African archaeology,” in Nelson, Sarah Milledge (ed.), Worlds of Gender: The Archaeology of Women's Lives around the Globe, Lanham, MD: AltaMira, 2007.Google Scholar
May, Elaine Tyler, Homeward Bound: American Families in the Cold War Era, New York: Basic Books, 1990.Google Scholar
Maynes, Mary Jo, and Waltner, Ann, The Family: A World History, New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Maynes, Mary Jo, and Waltner, Ann, “Temporalities and periodization in deep history: Technology, gender, and benchmarks of ‘human development,’” Social Science History 36 (2012), 59–83.Google Scholar
Maynes, Mary Jo, Waltner, Ann, Soland, Birgitte, and Strasser, Ulrike (eds.), Gender, Kinship and Power, New York: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Pargas, Damian Alan, “Boundaries and opportunities: Comparing slave family formation in the Antebellum South,” Journal of Family History 35 (2008), 316–45.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, Sarah B., Goddesses, Whores, Wives, and Slaves, New York: Schocken Books, 1995.Google Scholar
Safley, Thomas, Let No Man Put Asunder: The Control of Marriage in the German Southwest, 1550–1620, Kirksville: Northeast Missouri State University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Seaman, Gary, “The sexual politics of karmic retribution,” in Ahern, Emily Martin and Gates, Hill (eds.), The Anthropology of Taiwanese Society, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Seed, Patricia, To Love, Honor and Obey in Colonial Mexico: Conflicts over Marriage Choice, 1574–1821, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelach, Gideon, “Marxist and post-Marxist paradigms for the Neolithic,” in Linduff, Kathryn (ed.), Gender and Chinese Archaeology, Lanham, MD: AltaMira, 1999.Google Scholar
Smail, Daniel Lord, On Deep History and the Brain, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Stoler, Ann Laura, Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power: Race and the Intimate in Colonial Rule, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Stoler, Ann Laura, Race and the Education of Desire: Foucault's History of Sexuality and the Colonial Order of Things, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Tattersall, Ian, The World from Beginnings to 4000 bce, New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teiser, Stephen, The Ghost Festival in Medieval China, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomasz, Luis Filipe Ferrera Reiz, “The Malay Sultanate of Melaka,” in Reid, Anthony (ed.), Southeast Asia in the Early Modern Era, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Troy, Lana, “She for whom all is said and done: The ancient Egyptian queen,” in Nelson, Sarah Milledge (ed.), Ancient Queens: Archaeological Explorations, Lanham, MD: AltaMira, 2003.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, Ruth, “Gender archaeology in Europe,” in Nelson, Sarah Milledge (ed.), Worlds of Gender: The Archaeology of Women's Lives around the Globe, Lanham, MD: AltaMira, 2007.Google Scholar
Wiesner-Hanks, Merry E., Christianity and Sexuality in the Early Modern World: Regulating Desire, Reforming Practice, London: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
Wiesner-Hanks, Merry E., et al., Discovering the Global Past, 4th edn., Independence, KY: Wadsworth Publishing, 2011, vol. ii.Google Scholar
Witte, John Jr., From Sacrament to Contract: Marriage, Religion, and Law in the Western Tradition, 2nd edn., Louisville, KY: John Knox Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Zimmerer, Jürgen, “Annihilation in Africa: The ‘race war’ in German Southwest Africa (1904–1908) and its significance for a global history of genocide,” Bulletin of the German Historical Institute Issue 37 (2005), 51–7.Google Scholar