Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T07:46:54.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - The Industrial Relations Perspective on Lean Systems, Workers, and Unions

from Part I - Theories of Lean Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2021

By
John Paul MacDuffie
Edited by
Thomas Janoski  and
Darina Lepadatu
Thomas Janoski
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky
Darina Lepadatu
Affiliation:
Kennesaw State University, Georgia
Get access

Summary

The impact of lean systems on workers and unions was fully intertwined with the overall attention to the rise of lean production as an alternative to Fordist mass production in the late 1980s and 1990s. With “lean” as the name given to the Toyota Production System (TPS) by MIT’s International Motor Vehicle Program in The Machine That Changed the World (Womack, Jones, and Roos 1990), the link to the global automotive industry and specifically Toyota was clear. At that stage of the industry’s globalization, the transfer of TPS outside of Japan to “transplants” in the USA and elsewhere was riveting the attention of industry executives, plant managers, investment analysts, and academics alike. Transfer of TPS/lean in such a highly unionized industry immediately necessitated dealing with issues of worker and union acceptance or rejection of that transfer, particularly given striking institutional differences between Japan and the West.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge International Handbook of Lean Production
Diverging Theories and New Industries around the World
 , pp. 92 - 123
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abo, Tetsuo. 1994. Hybrid Factory: The Japanese Production System in the United States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Paul S. 1992. “The ‘Learning Bureaucracy’: New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc.” Research in Organizational Behavior. 15: 111–194.Google Scholar
Adler, Paul S. 2006. “Beyond Hacker Idiocy: A New Community in Software Development,” pp. 198–259 in The Firm as a Collaborative Community: Reconstructing Trust in the Knowledge Economy, Heckscher, Charles and Adler, Paul S. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Paul S. and Borys, Brian, 1996. “Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive.” Administrative Science Quarterly. 41: 61–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Paul S., Goldoftas, Barbara, and Levine, David. 1997. “Ergonomics, Employee Involvement, and the Toyota Production System: A Case Study of NUMMI’s 1993 Model Introduction.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 50: 416–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Paul S., McGarry, Frank E., Irion-Talbot, Wendy B., and Binney, Derek J.. 2005. “Enabling Process Discipline: Lessons on Implementing the Capability Maturity Model for Software.” MIS Quarterly Executive. 4: 215–227.Google Scholar
Adler, Paul S., Benner, Mary, Brunner, David James, MacDuffie, John Paul, Osono, Emi, Staats, Bradley R., Takeuchi, Hirotaka, Tushman, Michael L., and Winter, Sidney G.. 2009. “Perspectives on the Productivity Dilemma.” Journal of Operations Management. 27(2): 99–113.Google Scholar
Aoki, Katsuki. 2019. “The Roles of Material Artifacts in Managing the Learning-Performance Paradox: The Kaizen Case.” Academy of Management Journal (published online), https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamber, Greg, Stanton, Pauline, Bartram, Timothy, and Ballardie, Ruth. 2014. “Lean Processes and Outcomes for Employees: Towards a Research Agenda.” International Journal of Human Resource Management. 25(21): 2881–2891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartley, Tim and Child, Curtis. 2014. “Shaming the Corporation: The Social Production of Targets and the Anti-Sweatshop Movement.” American Sociological Review. 79(4): 653–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benner, Mary J. and Tushman, Michael L.. 2003. “Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited.” Academy of Management Review. 28(2): 238–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braverman, Harry. 1974. Labor and Monopoly Capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutcher-Gershenfeld, Joel, Brooks, Dan, and Molloy, Martin. 2015. Inside the Ford-UAW Transformation: Pivotal Events in Valuing Work and Delivering Results. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
De Treville, Suzanne and Antonakis, John 2006. “Could Lean Production Job Design be Intrinsically Motivating? Contextual Configurational, and Levels-of-Analysis Issues.” Journal of Operations Management. 24(2): 99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Distelhorst, Greg, Hainmueller, Jens, and Locke, Richard. 2017. “Does Lean Improve Labor Standards? Management and Social Performance in the Nike Supply Chain.” Management Science. 63(3): 707–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlop, John. 1958. Industrial Relations Systems. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Egels-Zandén, Niklas. 2007. “Suppliers’ Compliance with MNCs’ Codes of Conduct: Behind the Scenes at Chinese Toy Suppliers.” Journal of Business Ethics. 75(1): 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Follett, Mary Parker. 1949. Freedom and Co-ordination: Lectures in Business Organization. New York: Management Publications Trust Limited.Google Scholar
Fox, Alan. 1974. Beyond Contract. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Fucini, Joseph and Fucini, Suzy. 1990. Working for the Japanese: Inside Mazda’s American Auto Plant. New York: The Free Press, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Garrahan, Philip and Stewart, Paul. 1992. The Nissan Enigma. London: Cassel.Google Scholar
Gerhart, Barry. 2007. “Horizontal and Vertical Fit in Human Resource Systems,” pp. 317–348 in Ostroff, Cheri and Judge, Tim (eds.) Perspectives on Organizational Fit. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gittell, Jody Hoffer. 2011. “New Directions for Relational Coordination Theory,” pp. 74–94 in Cameron, Kim S. and Spreitzer, Gretchen (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gittell, Jody Hoffer, Seidner, Rob, and Wimbush, Julian. 2010. “A Relational Model of How High-Performance Work Systems Work.” Organization Science. 21(2): 490–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glover, Linda and Noon, Mike. 2005. “Shop-floor Workers Responses to Quality Management Initiatives: Broadening the Disciplined Worker Thesis.” Work, Employment and Society. 9(4): 727–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glover, Linda and Siu, Noel. 2011. “The Human Resource Barriers to Managing Quality in China.” International Journal of Human Resources Management. 11(5): 867–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glover, Linda, Tregaskis, Olga, and Butler, Peter. 2014. “Mutual Gains? The Workers Verdict: A Longitudinal Study.” International Journal of Human Resources Management. 25(6): 895–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Laurie. 1995. On the Line at Subaru-Isuzu: The Japanese Model and the American Worker. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Hackman, J. Richard and Oldham, Greg. 1975. “Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey.” Journal of Applied Psychology. 60(2): 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopp, Wallace and Spearman, Mark. 1996. Factory Physics: Foundations of Manufacturing Management. Homewood, IL: Richard Irwin.Google Scholar
James, Reynold P. 2012. International Transference of Lean Production Systems: Managerial Lessons from Toyota Transplants in the USA, Australia, and India. Ph.D. dissertation, Swinburne University of Technology, Malaysia.Google Scholar
Janoski, Thomas. 2015. “The New Division of Labor as Lean Production.” International Journal of Sociology. 45(2): 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayasinghe, Mevan. 2016. “The Operational and Signaling Benefits of Voluntary Labor Code Adoption: Reconceptualizing the Scope of Human Resource Management in Emerging Economies.” Academy of Management Journal. 59(2): 658–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jürgens, Ulrich. 1995. “Group Work and the Reception of Uddevalla in the German Car Industry,” pp. 199–213 in Sandberg, Ake (ed.) Enriching Production. Perspectives on Volvo’s Uddevalla Plant as an Alternative to Lean Production. Avebury: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Jürgens, Ulrich 1997. “Rolling Back Cycle Times: The Renaissance of the Classic Assembly Line in Final Assembly,” pp. 255–273 in Shimokawa, Koichi, Jürgens, Ulrich, and Fujimoto, Takahiro (eds.) Transforming Automobile Assembly: Experience in Automation and Work Organization. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Harry. 1985. Changing Gears: Changing Labor Relations in the U.S. Automobile Industry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Harry 1993. “The Decentralization of Collective Bargaining: A Literature Review and Comparative Analysis.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 47(1): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Bruce. 1993. The Origins & Evolution of the Field of Industrial Relations in the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kenney, Martin and Florida, Richard. 1993. Beyond Mass Production: The Japanese System and Its Transfer to the US. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, Horst and Schumann, Michael. 1984. “Work and Social Character: Old and New Contours.” Economic and Industrial Democracy. 5(1): 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jaewon, MacDuffie, John Paul, and Pil, Frits K.. 2010. “Employee Voice and Organizational Performance: Team vs. Representative Influence.” Human Relations. 63(3): 371–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Janice. 1989. “The Human Costs of Manufacturing Reform.” Harvard Business Review. 89(2)(March/April): 60–70.Google Scholar
Kochan, Thomas, Katz, Harry, and McKersie, Robert. 1986. The Transformation of American Industrial Relations. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kochan, Thomas, Lansbury, Russell, and MacDuffie, John Paul (eds.). 1997. After Lean Production: Evolving Employment Practices in the World Auto Industry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lepadatu, Darina and Janoski, Thomas. 2014. Diversity at Kaizen Motors. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Lewchuk, Wayne. 1989. “Fordism and British Motor Car Employers 1896–1932,” pp. 82–110 in Gospel, Howard F. and Littler, Craig R. (eds.) Managerial Strategies and Industrial Relations: An Historical and Comparative Study. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar
Liker, Jeffrey. 2004. The Toyota Way. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Liker, Jeffrey, Fruin, W. Mark, and Adler, Paul S.. 1999. Remade in America: Transplanting and Transforming Japanese Management Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liker, Jeffrey and Meier, David. 2007. Toyota Talent: Developing Your People the Toyota Way. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Litwin, Adam Seth. 2015. “Nose to Tail: Using the Whole Employment Relationship to Link Worker Participation to Operational Performance.” Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations. 21: 143–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, Richard. 1992. “The Demise of the National Union in Italy: Lessons for Comparative Industrial Relations Theory.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 45(2): 229–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, Richard 2013. The Promise and Limits of Private Power: Promoting Labor Standards in a Global Economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, Richard, Qin, Fei, and Brause, Alberto. 2007. “Does Monitoring Improve Labor Standards? Lessons from Nike.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 61(1): 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDuffie, John Paul. 1995a. “Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 48(2): 197–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDuffie, John Paul 1995b. “Workers’ Roles in Lean Production: The Implications for Worker Representation,” pp. 54–69 in Babson, Steve (ed.) Lean Work: Empowerment and Exploitation in the Global Auto Industry. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
MacDuffie, John Paul 1996a. “International Trends in Work Organization in the Auto Industry,” pp. 71–113 in Turner, Lowell and Wever, Kirsten (eds.) The Comparative Political Economy of Industrial Relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
MacDuffie, John Paul 1996b. “From Fixed to Flexible: Automation and Work Organization Trends from The International Assembly Plant Survey,” pp. 328–354 in Shimokawa, Koichi, Jürgens, Ulrich, and Fujimoto, Takahiro (eds.) Transforming Auto Assembly: International Experiences with Automation and Work Organization. Frankfurt: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
MacDuffie, John Paul and Pil, Frits K.. 1997. “Changes in Auto Industry Employment Practices: An International Overview,” pp. 9–42 in Kochan, Thomas, Lansbury, Russell, and MacDuffie, John Paul (eds.) After Lean Production: Evolving Employment Practices in the World Auto Industry. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Magnani, Florian, Carbone, Valentina, and Moati, Valerie. 2019. “The Human Dimension of Lean: A Literature Review.” Supply Chain Forum. 20(2): 132–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishina, Kaz. 1998. “Making Toyota in America: Evidence from the Kentucky Transplant, 1986–1994,” pp. 99–128 in Boyer, Robert, Charron, Elsie, Jürgens, Ulrich and Tolliday, Steven (eds.) Between Imitation and Innovation, the Transfer and Hybridization of Productive Models in the International Automobile Industry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardi, Tommaso. 2005. “Where Did It Go Wrong? Hybridization and Crisis of Toyota Motor Manufacturing UK, 1989–2001.” International Sociology. 20(1): 93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardi, Tommaso 2007. “Redefining the Toyota Production System: The European Side of the Story.” New Technology, Work, and Employment. 22(1): 2–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Mike and Slaughter, Jane. 1988. Choosing Sides: Unions and the Team Concept. Boston, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
Pil, Frits K. and MacDuffie, John Paul. 1996. “The Adoption of High Involvement Work Practices.” Industrial Relations. 35(3): 423–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ries, Eric. 2011. The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses. New York: Crown Books.Google Scholar
Rinehart, James W., Huxley, Christopher Victor, and Robertson, David. 1997. Just Another Car Factory? Lean Production and Its Discontents. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, Cornell University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubinstein, Saul and Kochan, Thomas A.. 2001. Learning from Saturn: Possibilities for Corporate Governance. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Sabel, Charles. 1993. Learning by Monitoring: The Institutions of Economic Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shah, Rachna and Ward, Peter T.. 2007. “Defining and Developing Measures of Lean Production.” Journal of Operations Management. 25(4): 785–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimada, Haruo and MacDuffie, John Paul. 1998. “Industrial Relations and ‘Humanware’: Japanese Investments in Automobile Manufacturing in the United States,” in Beechler, Schon (ed.) The Japanese Enterprise. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shook, John. 2010. “Cultural Transformation at NUMMI.” Sloan Management Review, January 1.Google Scholar
Signoretti, Andrea. 2019. “Explaining Variation in the Social Performance of Lean Production: A Comparative Case Study of the Role Played by Workplace Unions’ Framing of the System and Institutions.” Industrial Relations. 50(2): 126–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvia, Stephen J. 2018. “The United Auto Workers’ Attempts to Unionize Volkswagen Chattanooga.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 71(3): 600–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spear, Steven and Bowen, Kent. 1999. “Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System.” Harvard Business Review. 77(5)(September).Google Scholar
Westney, D. Eleanor. 1999. “Organization Theory Perspectives on the Cross-Border of Organizational Patterns,” pp. 385–405 in Liker, Jeffrey, Fruin, Mark, and Adler, Paul (eds.) Re-Made in America: Transplanting and Transforming Japanese Management Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilms, Wellford, Hardcastle, Alan J., and Zell, Deone. 1994. “Cultural Transformation at NUMMI.” Sloan Management Review, October 15.Google Scholar
Womack, James, Jones, Daniel, and Roos, Daniel. 1990. The Machine That Changed the World. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Zhang, Lu. 2015. “Lean Production with Chinese Characteristics: A Case Study of China’s Automobile Industry.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology. 45(2): 152–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×