Book contents
- Frontmatter
- General Introduction
- Part I The Earlier Empire c. 500–c. 700
- 1 Justinian and His Legacy (500–600)
- 2 Eastern Neighbours
- 2a Persia and the Sasanian Monarchy (224–651)
- 2b Armenia (400–600)
- 2c The Arabs to the Time of the Prophet
- 3 Western Approaches (500–600)
- 4 Byzantium Transforming (600–700)
- Part II The Middle Empire c. 700–1204
- Part III The Byzantine Lands in the Later Middle Ages 1204–1492
- Glossary (Including some Proper Names)
- Genealogical Tables and Lists of Rulers
- List of alternative place names
- Bibliography
- Picture Acknowledgements
- Index
- References
2a - Persia and the Sasanian Monarchy (224–651)
from 2 - Eastern Neighbours
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2010
- Frontmatter
- General Introduction
- Part I The Earlier Empire c. 500–c. 700
- 1 Justinian and His Legacy (500–600)
- 2 Eastern Neighbours
- 2a Persia and the Sasanian Monarchy (224–651)
- 2b Armenia (400–600)
- 2c The Arabs to the Time of the Prophet
- 3 Western Approaches (500–600)
- 4 Byzantium Transforming (600–700)
- Part II The Middle Empire c. 700–1204
- Part III The Byzantine Lands in the Later Middle Ages 1204–1492
- Glossary (Including some Proper Names)
- Genealogical Tables and Lists of Rulers
- List of alternative place names
- Bibliography
- Picture Acknowledgements
- Index
- References
Summary
romans and sasanians
A chapter dealing with Iranian feudalism in a distinguished series dedicated to The rise and fall of the Roman world bears the title ‘Iran, Rome’s greatest enemy. This title is more than merely a justification for the inclusion of a chapter on Iran in a work devoted to the history of the East Roman empire. It also reflects a host of fears and prejudices fostered for long centuries in the Roman world, since the trauma of Crassus’ defeat by the Parthians at Carrhae. Not even extended periods of decline and internal disarray within the Parthian monarchy, during which it was repeatedly invaded by the Roman army, could dispel the myth of the uncompromising threat posed by Iran to the Roman order. The replacement of the Parthian Arsacid dynasty by a vigorous new one, based in Fars, namely the Sasanian dynasty, at a time when the Roman empire itself was facing one of its severest crises, only aggravated its inhabitants’ deeply rooted fear of Iran. Ancient writers in the Roman oikoumenē passed on this attitude to modern western scholars.
It is the Sasanian bogeyman which has left a deep imprint in modern historiography. The Sasanian state is widely regarded as a much more centralised and effective political entity than its Parthian counterpart, with a far better army. The great pretensions and aspirations of its monarchs are believed to have been fed by the fervour of religious fanaticism, inspired by the Zoroastrian priesthood, which is commonly depicted as a well-organised state church.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of the Byzantine Empire c.500–1492 , pp. 130 - 155Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
References
- 1
- Cited by