Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T11:12:14.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter VI - The Bible in the Roman Catholic Church from Trent to the Present Day

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Get access

Summary

The Council of Trent

The first task of the Council of Trent was to delimit the spheres of Scripture and Tradition in the transmission of Catholic doctrine. For centuries the Church had been content with a rough-and-ready arrangement whereby Tradition (in the shape of the baptismal catechesis) introduced a believer to the doctrines of the faith, while Scripture was used at a later stage to test, to amplify and to collate those doctrines. Thus it was that St Thomas had said, in a much-abused phrase, sola canonica scriptura est regula fidei: only canonical Scripture—as distinct from apocryphal writings—is the (or a) rule of faith (lectio VI in John XXI). But doctrines which were accepted alone or mainly on the authority of Tradition were not unfamiliar. It was these doctrines which were the main objects of reforming attacks: purgatory, the invocation of saints, the conversion of the bread into the Body of Christ, infant baptism and the sacramental character of marriage. Hence the Council had to start by making its position clear on the value of Tradition as contrasted with Scripture.

After sharp discussion the Council came to the decision that it received and held in honour pari pietatis affectu ac reverentia, with equal devotion and veneration, the books of Scripture and the divine and apostolic traditions (that is, those coming from Christ or the apostles) which concerned faith or morals. It did not mean that each book of Scripture was inspired in exactly the same way, as some modern theologians have claimed, for the Council was not comparing book with book but the body of Scripture with the body of apostolic tradition.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bachelet, S. J., Bellarmin et la Bible Sixto-Clémentine (Paris, 1911). [This was attacked by Baumgarten, P., but further research by Kneller, C. A., in Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie, LII (1928), has confirmed its conclusions.]Google Scholar
Bacht, H., Geiselmann, J. R., Fries, H., Die mündliche Überlieferung (Munich, 1957)Google Scholar
Braun, F. O.P., L'œuvre du Père Lagrange (Fribourg, 1943).Google Scholar
Buzy, P., ‘Le concordisme préhistorique’, Mélanges Podechard (Lyons, 1945).Google Scholar
Calès, J., Le père Ferdinand Prat (Paris, 1942).Google Scholar
Coppens, J., Le chanoine A. van Hoonacker (Bruges, 1935)Google Scholar
Darlow, T. H. and Moule, H. F., Historical Catalogue of the Printed Editions of Holy Scripture in the Library of The British and Foreign Bible Society, 2 vols. (London, 1903–11).Google Scholar
de Dominis, M. A., De republica christiana (Cologne, 1622). [The theory of inspiration is in Book VII.]Google Scholar
D'Elia, P., Galileo in Cina (Rome, 1947).Google Scholar
Deville, R., ‘Richard Simon, Critique catholiquedu Pentateuque’, Nouvelle revue théologique, LXXIII (1951).Google Scholar
Geiselmann, J. R., Die Tradition in der neueren Theologie, III (Freiburg, 1959)Google Scholar
Giacchi, O., ‘Considerazioni sui due Processi contro Galileo’, Nel Terzo Centenario della Morte di Galilei (Milan, 1942).Google Scholar
Jedin, H., Geschichte des Konzils von Trient, vol. II (Freiburg, 1957); English trans. Graf, E. (Edinburgh, 1961).Google Scholar
Kleinhans, A., O.F.M., included the same statement in an article he wrote in Antonianum (1955
Lengsfeld, P., Überlieferung, Tradition und Schrift in der evangelischen und katholischen Theologie der Gegenwart (Paderborn, 1960)Google Scholar
Seynaeve, J., Newman's Doctrine on Holy Scripture (Louvain, 1953). [A thesis containing unpublished notes of Newman about inspiration, with some unfortunate errors of transcription.]Google Scholar
Stummer, F., Die Bedeutung Richard Simons für die Pentateuchkritik (Münster, 1912).Google Scholar
Sutcliffe, E. F. S.J., and Orchard, B. O.S.B., The Catholic Commentary on Holy Scripture (London, 1953).Google Scholar
Veit, L. A. and Lenhart, D., Kirche und Volksfrömmigkeit im Zeitalter des Barocks (Freiburg, 1956).Google Scholar
Vincent, H. O.P., Revue biblique, XLVII (1938).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×