Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T01:37:22.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - F. R. Leavis

from THE CRITIC AND THE INSTITUTIONS OF CULTURE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

By
Michael Bell
Edited by
A. Walton Litz ,
Louis Menand  and
Lawrence Rainey
A. Walton Litz
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Louis Menand
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Lawrence Rainey
Affiliation:
University of York
Get access

Summary

F. R. Leavis was one of the most potent single influences on English studies in the earlier and middle part of the twentieth century. He is best known for his radical revaluation of the accepted canon of English literature, and his impact lies in the revaluative activity itself as much as in the particular set of judgements it involved. His principal concern was with English literature as the expression of a distinctive culture. His radical revaluations, along with his sense of what it means to belong to a particular tradition, rest upon a comprehensive conception of literature and language. Furthermore, his career spanned the rise, and the subsequent renewed questioning, of English as an independent academic discipline. He maintained a passionate and intellectually grounded belief in the distinctiveness, and the cultural centrality, of English as a critical discipline, a belief which cannot be adequately described as liberal humanist, even if he would not have repudiated either term. The main purpose of the present essay will be to explicate his central belief as it is manifest with in his critical judgements. Accordingly, there follow in turn: a career survey covering the main Leavisian themes and occasions; a summary account of his conception of literature and language; an examination of his idea of social tradition of which the literary tradition is an integral part; a principled look at his rereading of literary tradition in respect of poetry and the novel; a brief look at some of the critics associated with Leavis including fellow contributors to Scrutiny: and finally a comment on the limitations and continuing significance of Leavis's thought about literature and criticism as he has himself become more distinctly an historical figure.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism , pp. 389 - 422
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Perry, ‘Components of the National Culture’, New Left Review, 50 (1968).Google Scholar
Annan, Noel, ‘Bloomsbury and the Leavises’, in Marcus, Jane (ed.), VirginiaWoolf and Bloomsbury: A Centenary Celebration (Bloomington, 1987).Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail, Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics, tr. Rotsel, R. W. (Ann Arbor, 1973).Google Scholar
Baldick, Chris, The Social Meaning of English Criticism, 1848–1932 (Oxford, 1983).Google Scholar
Barry, Peter, ‘The Enactive Fallacy’, Essays in Criticism, 30 (1980).Google Scholar
Bateson, F. W., Essays in Critical Dissent (London, 1972).Google Scholar
Bell, Michael, (ed.), Context of English Literature 1900–1930 (London, 1980).Google Scholar
Bell, Michael, F. R. Leavis (London, 1988).Google Scholar
Bergonzi, Bernard, ‘Leavis and Eliot: The Long Road to Rejection’, in The Myth of Modernism and Twentieth Century Literature (Brighton, 1986).Google Scholar
Bewley, Marius, The Complex Fate (London, 1952).Google Scholar
Bilan, R. O.The Literary Criticism of F. R. Leavis (Cambridge, 1979).Google Scholar
Boyers, Robert, Leavis, F. R., Judgement and the Discipline of Thought (Columbia, Mo., 1978).Google Scholar
Bradley, A. C., Shakespearean Tragedy (London, 1904).Google Scholar
Buckley, Vincent, Poetry and Morality: Studies in the Criticism of Matthew Arnold, T. S. Eliot and F. R. Leavis (London, 1959).Google Scholar
Casey, John, The Language of Criticism (London, 1966).Google Scholar
Collini, Stefan, Public Moralists: Political and Intellectual Life in Britain 1850–1930 (Oxford, 1991).Google Scholar
Cornelius, D. K., and Vincent, E. St., Cultures in Conflict: Reflections on the Leavis-Snow Controversy (Chicago, 1964).Google Scholar
Symposium on Leavis, Critical Quarterly, 1, no. 3 (1959).
Day, Gary, Re-Reading Leavis: Culture and Literary Criticism (London and New York, 1996).Google Scholar
Edel, Leon, Henry James, Volume 2: The Conquest of London, 1870–1881 (Philadelphia, 1962).Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S., ‘In Memory of Henry James’, Egoist, 5 (1918).Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S., Selected Essays (London, 1932).Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S., The Sacred Wood (London, 1920).Google Scholar
Empson, William, Milton's God (London, 1951).Google Scholar
Empson, William, Seven Types of Ambiguity (London, 1935).Google Scholar
Empson, William, Some Versions of Pastoral (London, 1935).Google Scholar
Empson, William, The Structure of Complex Words (London, 1951).Google Scholar
Greenwood, Edward, F. R. Leavis (London, 1978).Google Scholar
Gregor, Ian, ‘F. R. Leavis and The Great Tradition’, Sewanee Review, 93 (1985).Google Scholar
Hayman, Ronald, F. R. Leavis (London, 1976).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, On the Way to Language, tr. Herz, Peter D. (New York, 1971).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, Poetry, Language, and Thought, tr. Hofstadter, Albert (New York, 1971).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, tr. Lovitt, William (New York, 1977).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, What Is Called Thinking, tr. Wieck, F. P. and Glenn, J. Gray (New York, 1968).Google Scholar
Holloway, John, The Estabishment of English (London, 1972).Google Scholar
Hopkins, Gerard Manley, A Selection of His Poems and Prose, ed. Gardner, Helen (Harmondsworth, 1953).Google Scholar
Inglis, Fred, Radical Earnestness: English Social Theory 1880–1980 (Oxford, 1982).Google Scholar
James, Henry, The Art of the Novel, ed. Blackmur, R. P. (New York, 1934).Google Scholar
Kermode, Frank, Romantic Image (London, 1957).Google Scholar
Kinch, M. B., Baker, W., and Kimber, J., Leavis, F. R. and Leavis, Q. D.: An Annotated Bibliography (London, 1989).Google Scholar
Knight, G. Wilson, Principles of Shakespearean Production (London, 1936).Google Scholar
Knight, G. Wilson, The Crown of Life (London, 1947).Google Scholar
Knight, G. Wilson, The Imperial Theme (London, 1951).Google Scholar
Knight, G. Wilson, The Shakespearean Tempest (London, 1932).Google Scholar
Knight, G. Wilson, The Wheel of Fire (London, 1949).Google Scholar
Knights, L. C., Drama and Society in the Age of Jonson (London, 1937).Google Scholar
Knights, L. C., Explorations (London, 1946).Google Scholar
Knights, L. C., How Many Children Had Lady Macbeth?: An Essay in the Theory and Practice of Shakespearean Criticism (Cambridge, 1933).Google Scholar
Lawrence, D. H., Studies in Classic American Literature (London, 1924).Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R. ‘Anna Karenina’ and Other Essays (London, 1967).Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R. (with Thompson, Denys), Culture and Environment: Training in Critical Awareness (London, 1933).Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R.D. H. Lawrence (Cambridge, 1930).Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R.D. H. Lawrence: Novelist (London, 1955).Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R.Determinations (London, 1934).Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R. (with Leavis, Q. D.), Dickens the Novelist (London, 1970).Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R.Education and the University: A Sketch for an English School (London, 1943).Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R.English Literature in Our Time and the University: The Clark Lectures (London, 1969).Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R.Essays and Documents, ed. MacKillop, Ian and Storer, Richard (Sheffield, 1995).Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R.How to Teach Reading: A Primer for Ezra Pound (Cambridge, 1932).Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R. (with Leavis, Q. D.), Lectures in America (London, 1969).Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R.Letters in Criticism, ed. Tasker, John (London, 1974).Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R.Mass Civilization and Minority Culture (Cambridge, 1930).Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R. (ed.), Mill on Bentham and Coleridge (London, 1950).Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R.New Bearings in English Poetry (London, 1932).Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R.Nor Shall My Sword: Discourses on Pluralism, Compassion and Social Hope (London, 1972).Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R.Revaluation: Tradition and Development in English Poetry (London, 1936).Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R.The Common Pursuit (London, 1952).Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R.The Critic as Anti-Philosopher: Essays and Papers, ed. Singh, G. (London, 1982).Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R.The Great Tradition (London, 1948).Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R.The Living Principle: ‘English’ as a Discipline of Thought (London, 1975).Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R.Thoughts, Words and Creativity: Art and Thought in Lawrence (London, 1976).Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R.Toward Standards of Criticism (London, 1933).Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R.Two Cultures? The Significance of C. P. Snow, with an essay by Michael Yudkin on Snow's Rede Lecture (London, 1962).Google Scholar
Leavis, F. R.‘Valuation in Criticism’ and Other Essays, ed. Singh, G. (London, 1986).Google Scholar
Lewes, George Henry, The Principles of Success in Literature (London, 1869).Google Scholar
MacCabe, Colin, ‘The Cambridge Heritage: Richards, Empson and Leavis’, Southern Review, 19 (1986).Google Scholar
MacKillop, Ian, F. R. Leavis: A Life in Criticism (London, 1995).Google Scholar
Martin, Graham, ‘F. R. Leavis and the Function of Criticism’, Essays in Criticism, 46 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martz, Louis, The Paradise Within (New York, 1964).Google Scholar
McCallum, Pamela, Literature and Method: Towards a Critique of I. A. Richards, T. S. Eliot and F. R. Leavis (Dublin, 1983).Google Scholar
McLuhan, H. M., ‘Poetic and Rhetorical Analysis: The Case For Leavis Against Richards and Empson’, Sewanee Review, 52 (1944).Google Scholar
Mulhern, Francis, The Moment of ‘Scrutiny’ (London, 1979).Google Scholar
Symposium on Leavis, New Universities Quarterly, 30 (1975).
Nietzsche, Friedrich, The Portable Nietzsche, ed. Kaufmann, Walter (New York, 1954).Google Scholar
Palmer, D. J., The Rise of English Studies (London, 1965).Google Scholar
Richards, I. A., Coleridge on Imagination (London, 1934).Google Scholar
Richards, I. A., Interpretation in Teaching (London, 1937).Google Scholar
Richards, I. A., Practical Criticism: A Study of Literary Judgement (London, 1929).Google Scholar
Richards, I. A., Principles of Literary Criticism (London, 1924).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, I. A., Science and Poetry (London, 1926).Google Scholar
Richards, I. A., The Philosophy of Rhetoric (London, 1936).Google Scholar
Ricks, Christopher, Milton's Grand Style (London, 1963).Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul, The Rule of Metaphor, tr. Czerny, Robert, et al. (London, 1978).Google Scholar
Robertson, P. J. M., The Leavises on Fiction: An Historic Partnership (London, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Ian, The Survival of English (Cambridge, 1973).Google Scholar
Samson, Anne, F. R. Leavis: Social and Literary Critic 1895–1978 (London and New York, 1992).Google Scholar
Schorer, Mark, ‘Technique as Discovery’, in The World We Imagine (London, 1969).Google Scholar
Singh, G., F. R. Leavis: A Literary Biography (London, 1995).Google Scholar
Sontag, Susan, Against Interpretation (New York, 1966).Google Scholar
Stein, Arnold, Answerable Style (Minneapolis, 1953).Google Scholar
Steiner, George, ‘F. R. Leavis’, in Language and Silence (London, 1967).Google Scholar
Strickland, Geoffrey, Structuralism or Criticism (Cambridge, 1981).Google Scholar
Thompson, Denys (ed.), The Leavises: Recollections and Impressions (Cam-bridge, 1984).Google Scholar
Tillyard, E. M. W., The Muse Unchained: An Intimate Account of the Revolution in English Studies at Cambridge (London, 1958).Google Scholar
Trilling, Lionel, Sincerity and Authenticity (Cambridge, Mass., 1972).Google Scholar
Vaihinger, Hans, The Philosophy of ‘As If’, tr. Ogden, C. K. (London, 1924).Google Scholar
Walsh, William, F. R. Leavis (London, 1980).Google Scholar
Watson, Garry, The Leavises, the ‘Social’ and the Left (Swansea, 1977).Google Scholar
Wellek, René, ‘F. R. Leavis and the Scrutiny Group’, in A History of Modern Criticism, 1750–1950, Volume 5: English Criticism, 1900–1950 (New Haven, 1986).Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond, Culture and Society (London, 1958).Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond, The Country and the City (London, 1973).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical Investigations, tr. Anscombe, G. E. (rpt. Oxford, 1968).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×