Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T13:11:13.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - The agrarian structures of Latin America, 1930–1990

from PART THREE - ECONOMY AND SOCIETY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Norman Long
Affiliation:
Sociology, University of Bath
Bryan Roberts
Affiliation:
University of Texas at Austin
Leslie Bethell
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

The period from the 1930s to the 1980s was marked by far-reaching changes in agrarian structures throughout Latin America. Indeed, it could be argued that the magnitude of change was greater during this half century than in the preceding four centuries. Agricultural production increased dramatically but, by 1990, in almost all Latin American countries, agriculture had become a less important contributor to the gross national product than industry. The social and political significance of agriculture altered sharply. In the 1930s most people in Latin America made their living from the land. Land ownership was still the key to political and economic power at the regional and national level. Many presidents and key political figures were members of the landed elite. By the 1980s those working directly in agriculture were only a quarter of the total labour force. Urban interests and occupations based on industry and services (which included a wide range of financial and administrative services) had become politically dominant.

Crucial changes in the process of agricultural production accompanied this shift in the economic, political and social significance of agriculture and landholding. In the 1930s agricultural production, though usually market-orientated, was largely decentralized. Cropping practices and the organization of agricultural inputs varied from region to region, depending upon ecology, the availability of labour and the nature of the market. This had given rise to a diversity of agrarian structures that generated distinctive regional identities. By the early 1980s agricultural production had become increasingly centralized through the state or large-scale agribusinesses, usually linked to international marketing and financial institutions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R. N., A Community in the Andes: Problems and Progress in Muquiyauyo (Seattle, Wash., 1959).Google Scholar
Adelman, I. et al., ‘Life in a Mexican Village: a SAM perspective’, Journal of Development Studies, 25 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antioquia, , Palacios, M., Coffee in Colombia 1850–1970; an Economic, Social and Political History (Cambridge, 1980).Google Scholar
Archetti, E. and Stølen, K. A., Explotación familiar y acumulación de capital en el campo argentino (Buenos Aires, 1975).Google Scholar
Arizpe, L., Campesinado y migración (Mexico, D. F., 1985).Google Scholar
Arizpe, Lourdes, ‘Relay Migration and the Survival of the Peasant Household’, in Safa, Helen (ed.), Toward a Political Economy of Urbanization in Third World Countries (Oxford, 1982).Google Scholar
Arroyo, Alejandro J., El Abandono rural: un modelo explicativo de la emigración de trabajadores en el occidente de México (Guadalajara, 1989).Google Scholar
,AVANSCO/IDESAC, ONGS, Sociedad Civil y Estado en Guatemala: elementos para el debate (Guatemala City, 1990).
Babb, F. E., ‘Producers and Reproducers: Andean marketwomen in the economy’, in Nash, J. and Safa, H. (eds), Women and Change in Latin America (South Hadley, Mass., 1985)Google Scholar
Barkin, D. and King, T., Regional Economic Development: the River Basin Approach in Mexico (Cambridge, 1970).Google Scholar
Barkin, D., Desarrollo regional y reorganización campesina: la Chontalpa como reflejo del problema agropecuario Mexicano (Mexico, D. F., 1978).Google Scholar
Beckford, G.L., Persistent Poverty: Underdevelopment in Plantation Economies of the Third World (New York, 1972).Google Scholar
Bourque, S. C. and Warren, K. B., Women of the Andes: Patriarchy and Social Change in Two Peruvian Villages (Ann Arbor, Mich., 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brazil, , JosephLove, L., Rio Grande do Sul and Brazilian Regionalism, 1882–1930 (Stanford, Cal., 1971)Google Scholar
Brazil, , JosephLove, L., Sāo Paulo in the Brazilian Federation, 1889–1937 (Stanford, Cal., 1980)Google Scholar
Brazil, Joseph L. Love, Rio Grande do Sul and Brazilian Regionalism, 1882–1930 (Stanford, Cal., 1971)Google Scholar
Brazil, Joseph L. Love, Sāo Paulo in the Brazilian Federation, 1889–1937 (Stanford, Cal., 1980)Google Scholar
Cancian, F., Economics and Prestige in a Mayan Community: the Religious Cargo System of Zinacantan (Stanford, Cal., 1965)Google Scholar
Castillo, L. and Lehmann, D., ‘Chile's Three Land Reforms: the inheritors’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, 1, 2 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro Pozo, H., ‘Social and Economic-political Evolution of the Communities of Central Peru’, in Steward, J. (ed.), Handbook of South American Indians, Vol. II (Washington, D.C., 1946)Google Scholar
,Centro Latino Americano de Demografia (CELADE), Boletin Demográfuo, No. 23 (Santiago, 1979).
,CEPAL, ‘Los mercados de insumos tecnológicos y su adecuación a las economias campesinas; agroindustrias y agricultura campesina.’ Estudios e Informes (Santiago, 1984).
,CEPAL, Transformation ocupacional y crisis social en América Latina (Santiago, 1989).
Clayton, E., Agrarian Development in Peasant Economies (Oxford, 1964).Google Scholar
Cleaves, P. and Scurrah, M., Agriculture, Bureaucracy, and Military Government in Peru (Ithaca, N.Y., 1982).Google Scholar
Collins, J., Unseasonal Migrations: the Effects of Rural Labour Scarcity in Peru (Princeton, N.J., 1988).Google Scholar
Cotler, J., ‘The Mechanics of Internal Domination and Social Change in Peru’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 3, 12 (1967–8).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Alejandro, C. F. points out that only a small part of the spectacular advances in rural technology since the 1930s found their way to Argentina: Essays on the Economic History of the Argentine Republic (New Haven, Conn., 1970).Google Scholar
de Alcántara, C. Hewitt, The Modernization of Mexican Agriculture: Socioeconomic Implications of Technological Change 1940–1970 (Geneva, 1976).Google Scholar
de Janvry, A., The Agrarian Question and Reformism in Latin America (Baltimore, Md., 1981).Google Scholar
Dean, W., Rio Claro: a Brazilian Plantation System, 1820–1920 (Stanford, Cal., 1976)Google Scholar
Deere, C. and Leal, M. León, Women in Andean Agriculture: Peasant Production and Rural Wage Employment in Colombia and Peru (Washington, D.C., 1982)Google Scholar
Deere, Carmen D., Marchetti, R., and Reinhardt, N., ‘The Peasantry and the Development of Sandinista Agrarian Policy. 1979–1984’, Latin American Research Review, 20, 3 (1985).Google Scholar
Dobyns, H., Doughty, P. L. and Lasswell, H. D. (eds), Peasants, Power and Applied Social Change: Vicos as a Model (Beverly Hills, Cal., 1971).Google Scholar
Enriquez, L., Harvesting Change: Labor and Agrarian Reform in Nicaragua 1979–1990 (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1991)Google Scholar
,FAO, Production Yearbook, Vol. II. (1949).
,FAO, Production Yearbook, (1983).
Feder, E., Strawberry Imperialism: an Enquiry into the Mechanisms of Dependency in Mexican Agriculture (The Hague, 1977).Google Scholar
Feder, E., ‘Agroindustries and rural underdevelopment’, in Preston, D. A. (ed.), Environment, Society and Rural Change in Latin America (London, 1980)Google Scholar
Figueroa, A., Capitalist Development and Peasant Economy in Peru (Cambridge, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, G., Tzintzuntzan (Boston, Mass., 1967)Google Scholar
Foweraker, J., The Struggle for Land: a Political Economy of the Pioneer Frontier in Brazil from 1930 to the Present Day (Cambridge, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallo, Ezquiel‘Boom’ cenalero y cambios en la estructura socio-politica de Santa Fe (1870–1895) (Buenos Aires, 1974).Google Scholar
Gill, L., Peasants, Entrepreneurs, and Social Change: Frontier Development in Lowland Bolivia (Boulder, Colo., 1987)Google Scholar
Gonzalez, L., San José de Gracia: Mexican Village in Transition (Austin, Tex., 1974)Google Scholar
Goodman, D. and Redclift, M., ‘The ‘Boias-frias’ – Rural Proletarianization and Urban Marginality in Brazil’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1, 2 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, D., Sorj, B. and Wilkinson, J., ‘Agro-industry, State Policy, and Rural Social Structures: recent analyses of proletarianization in Brazilian agriculture’, in Munslow, B. and Finch, H. (eds), Proletarianization in the Third World (London, 1984).Google Scholar
Goodman, D., Sorj, B. and Wilkinson, J., From Farming to Biotechnology: a Theory of Agroindustrial Development (Oxford, 1987).Google Scholar
Goodman, D. and Redclift, M., Environment and Development in Latin America (Manchester, 1991).Google Scholar
Goodman, David and Redclift, Michael, From Peasant to Proletarian (Oxford, 1981).Google Scholar
Graziano, J. da Silva, ‘Estructura tenencial y relaciones de producción en el camp o brasileno’, Estudios Rurales Latinoamericanos (Bogotá) 5, 2, (1982)Google Scholar
Grindle, M. S., Bureaucrats, Politicians, and Peasants in Mexico: a Case Study in Public Policy (Berkeley, Cal., 1977).Google Scholar
Grondin, M., Comunidad andina: explotación calculada (Santo Domingo, 1978).Google Scholar
Harris, Olivia, ‘Labour and Produce in an Ethnic Economy, Northern Potosi, Bolivia’, in , D. Lehmann (ed.), Ecology and Exchange in the Andes (Cambridge, 1982).Google Scholar
Heath, D., Erasmus, C. J., Buechler, H. C., Land Reform and Social Revolution in Bolivia (New York, 1969).Google Scholar
Hemming, J. (ed.), The Frontier After a Decade of Colonization (Manchester, 1985).Google Scholar
Hewitt de Alcántara, C., Anthropological Perspectives on Rural Mexico (London, 1984)Google Scholar
Holloway, T. H., Immigrants on the Land: Coffee and Society in Sāo Paulo (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1980).Google Scholar
Horton, D., Land Reform and Reform Enterprises in Peru, Vols. I and II (Madison, 1974)Google Scholar
Hugh-Jones, S., ‘The Palm and the Pleaides: initiation and cosmology in Northwest Amazonia’, in Cambridge Studies in Social Anthropology, 24 (1987).Google Scholar
Joseph, G., Revolution from Without: Yucatan, Mexico and the United States, 1880–1924 (Cambridge, 1982).Google Scholar
Kay, C., Chile: an Appraisal of Popular Unity's Agrarian Reform, Occasional Paper no. 13, ,Institute of Latin American Studies, Glasgow, 1974.Google Scholar
Kay, Cristóbal, ‘Achievements and Contradictions of the Peruvian Agrarian Reform’, Journal of Development Studies, 182 (1982).Google Scholar
Klarén, P. F., Modernization, Dislocation and Aprismo: Origins of the Peruvian Aprista Party 1879–1932 (Austin, Tex., 1973).Google Scholar
Kroeber, A., Anthropology (New York, 1948).Google Scholar
Laite, A. J., Industrial Development and Migrant Labour (Manchester, 1981)Google Scholar
Larson, BrookeColonialism and Agrarian Transformation in Bolivia, Cochabamba, 1500–1900 (Princeton, N.J. 1988).Google Scholar
León de Leal, Magdalena, Debate sobre la mujer en América Latina y el Caribe: discución acerca de la unidad producción-reproducción (Bogotá, 1982).Google Scholar
Lipton, M., ‘Family, Fungibility and Formality: rural advantages of informal non-farm enterprise versus the urban-formal state’, in Amin, S. (ed.), Human Resources, Employment and Development (London, 1984).Google Scholar
Long, Norman and Roberts, Bryan, Miners, Peasants and Entrepreneurs: Regional Development in the Central Highlands of Peru (Cambridge, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopes, Juarez Brandāo, ‘Capitalist development and agrarian structure in Brazil’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2, 1 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowenthal, A. (ed.), The Peruvian Experiment (Princeton, N.J., 1975)Google Scholar
Lund Skar, Sarah, ‘Interhousehold Cooperation in Peru's Southern Andes: a case of multiple sibling group marriage’, in Long, N. (ed.), Family and Work in Rural Societies: Perspectives on Non-Wage Labour (London, 1984)Google Scholar
Mallon, F., The Defence of Community in Peru's Central Highlands: Peasant Struggle and Capitalist Transition, 1860–1940 (Princeton, N.J., 1983)Google Scholar
Martínez Saldana, T., El costo social de un exito politico: la politica expansionista del estado Mexicano en el agro lagunero (Chapingo, Mexico, 1980).Google Scholar
McBride, G. M., Chile: Land and Society (New York, 1936).Google Scholar
McClintock, C., Peasant Cooperatives and Political Change in Peru (Princeton, N.J. 1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClintock, Cynthia, ‘Reform Governments and Policy Implementation: Lessons from Peru’, in Grindle, M. S. (ed.), The Politics and Policy of Implementation (Princeton, N.J., 1980).Google Scholar
Medeiros, A. C., Politics and Intergovernmental Relations in Brazil: 1964–1982 (New York, 1986).Google Scholar
Mendoza, and Balán, Tucuman J., ‘Una cuestion regional en la Argentina: burguesias provinciates y el mercado nacional en el desarrollo argoexportador’, Desarrollo Económico, 18, 69 (1978).Google Scholar
Mexico, , Meyer, J. A., The Cristero Rebellion: the Mexican People between Church and State, 1926–1929 (Cambridge, 1976)Google Scholar
Mitchell, W. P. reaches similar conclusions in his study of the Peruvian village of Quinua: Peasants on the Edge: Crops, Cult, and Crisis in the Andes (Austin, Tex., 1991).Google Scholar
Morales, E., Cocaine: White Gold Rush in Peru (Tucson, Ariz. 1989)Google Scholar
Nagengast, C. and Kearney, M., ‘Mixtec Ethnicity: social identity, political consciousness, and political activism’, Latin American Research Review, 25, 2, (1990).Google Scholar
Ortega, E., ‘La agriculture campesina en América Latina’, Revista de la CEPAL No. 16, (Santiago, 1982).Google Scholar
Padron, M., Las organizaciones no gubernamentales de desarrollo en el Perú (Lima, 1988).Google Scholar
Parsons, E., Mitla (Chicago, Ill., 1936).Google Scholar
Parsons, Elsie, Mitla (Chicago, Ill., 1936)Google Scholar
Platt, T., Estado boliviano y ayllu andino: tierra y tributo en el norte de Potosi (Lima, 1982).Google Scholar
Prado, Oscar Núnez del, Kuyo Chico: Applied Anthropology in an Indian Community (Chicago, Ill., 1973).Google Scholar
Redclift, M. R., Development and the Environmental Crisis: Red or Green Alternatives? (London, 1984).Google Scholar
Redfield, R. R., The Folk Culture of the Yucatan (Chicago, Ill., 1941)Google Scholar
Sanderson, S. E., The Transformation of Mexican Agriculture: International Structure and the Politics of Rural Change (Princeton, N.J., 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, S. E. (ed.), The Americas in the New International Division of Labor (New York, 1985)Google Scholar
Scarzanella, E., ‘“Corn Fever”: Italian tenant farming families in Argentina (1895–1912)’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, 3, 1 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmink, Marianne and Wood, Charles H., Contested Frontiers in Amazonia (New York, 1992)Google Scholar
Schryer, F., Rancheros of Pisaflores: the History of a Peasant Bourgeoisie in Twentieth-century Mexico (Toronto, 1980)Google Scholar
Scott, C. D., ‘Transnational Corporations and Asymmetries in the Latin American Food System’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, 3, 1 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirley, R. W., The End of a Tradition: Culture Change and Development in the Municipio of Cunha, Sāo Paulo, Brazil (New York, 1971).Google Scholar
Silva, J. Graziano da, ‘Estructura tenencial y relaciones de producción en el camp o brasileno’, Estudios Rurales Latinoamericanos (Bogotá) 5, 2, (1982)Google Scholar
Smith, G. A., Livelihood and Resistance: Peasants and the Politics of Land in Peru (Berkeley, Cal., 1989).Google Scholar
Solano Sáez, J., ‘From Cooperative to Hacienda: the Case of the Agrarian Society of Pucara’, in Long, N. and Roberts, B. (eds), Peasant Cooperation and Capitalist Expansion in Central Peru (Austin, Tex., 1978).Google Scholar
Stolcke, V., Coffee Planters, Workers, and Wives: Class Conflict and Gender Relations on Sāo Paulo Plantations, 1850–1980 (Oxford, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taussig, M. T., ‘Peasant economies and capitalist development of agriculture in the Cauca Valley, Colombia’, in Harriss, J. (ed.), Rural Development: Theories of Peasant Economies and Agrarian Change (London, 1982).Google Scholar
Taussig, M., The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America (Chapel Hill, N.C., 1980).Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C., Rural Life in Argentina (Baton Rouge, La. 1948)Google Scholar
Thorp, R. and Bertram, G., Peru 1890–1977: Growth and Policy in an Open Economy (London, 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobler, H. W., ‘Peasants and the Shaping of the Revolutionary State, 1910–1940’, in Katz, F. (ed.), Riot, Rebellion, and Revolution: Rural Social Conflict in Mexico (Princeton, N.J., 1988).Google Scholar
Tschopik, H., Highland Communities of Central Peru (Washington, D.C., 1947)Google Scholar
,United Nations, Statistical Yearbook for Latin America (1984).
Vogt, E., Zinacantan: a Maya Community in the Highlands of Chiapas (Cambridge, 1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagley, C., Amazon Town: a Study of Man in the Tropics (New York, 1953)Google Scholar
Whiteford, S., Migration, Ethnicity, and Adaptation: Bolivian Migrant Workers in Northwest Argentina (Austin, Tex., 1975).Google Scholar
Wilkie, J. W., Statistical Abstract of Latin America, vol. 15, (Los Angeles, Cal., 1974).Google Scholar
Wolf, E., ‘Aspects of Group Relations in a Complex Society: Mexico’, American Anthropologist, 58, 6 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,World Bank, Rural Development (Washington, D.C., 1975).
Zazueta, A. E., ‘Agricultural policy in Mexico: the limits of a growth model’, in Orlove, B. S., Foley, M. W. and Love, T. F. (eds), State, Capital, and Rural Society: Anthropological Perspectives on Political Economy in Mexico and the Andes (Boulder, Colo., 1989).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×